PO item should not be change in case of change PO if ASN has created

Hello Experts,
We have implemented MM-SUS. We are facing a problem, A PO consist of 2 items on different delivery date, Vendor has created a ASN For first item. Now the ASN is pending for 2nd item on require delivery date.
In between, Purchase change the purchase order and by mistake he has changed the QTY of first item, in change order notification 1st item is also going to supplier.
We wanted that if ASN has created for any item then even in change PO it should not go to Supplier again so that supplier can not create a ASN again.
Please help us.
Thanks
Aakash.

Hi,
There is a field called Completion rule in Item Category.
A: Item complete after 1st reference
B: Item complete after full Qty referenced
In the Item category of Quotation in your case put Completion rule as A. So whenever a Sales Order is created with reference to the Quotation, the Quotation will be complete.
So even if some-one changes the Quotation later on, it will not be possible to create a sales order by referencing it.
Hope this helps.

Similar Messages

  • In ME22N deleted line item should not be Re-activate

    Dear Sap Guru's
                         For Purchase order in T.code ME22N deleted line item should not be reactivate.
    If i create some line items in this t.code and i delete these items then ince again someone wants to views these they he should not be able to view the deleted line items.
                        plz give me reply as soon as possible.Urgent

    hi
    version management
    SPRO –> Material Management –> Purchasing -> Version Management .
    After activating version management you can see the Version tab in ME53N near to source of supply tab in PR.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm30/helpdata/en/46/882fdd8bfc1743bd5ef8b532f94402/content.htm
    SAP Enterprise Buyer provides you with version management for purchasing documents. As a first step, you can display versions of purchase orders and contracts.
    The system creates a version in the background if you, as a purchaser, carry out one of the following actions:
    · You change a posted purchase order
    · You order a posted purchase order again
    · You change a contract that has already been released
    · You release an already released contract again
    In contrast to the change documents that retain a change history, a version displays the status of a document at a specific point in time.
    Version management provides a check for you as a purchaser, for example, if you wish to display a purchase order in the form in which you transferred it to the vendor on day X. A version provides clarity, for example, in negotiations on a contract.
    Features
    You can use versions as follows:
    · Display
    · Compare and list differences in tabular form. The comparison result has separate areas that can be displayed:
    Header data (including organizational data, tax and payment data; partner data and documents)
    Item data (including taxes and limits if they exist; partner data, documents; account assignment and conditions)
    · Archive, if it relates to transaction data (you can archive versions of purchase orders, but not contract versions)
    You cannot change or output versions. This is only possible for the active document.
    Also, visit the following thread:
    regards
    kunal

  • What is causing this?  The file "iTunes Library.itl" does not appear to be a valid iTunes library file. iTunes has created a new iTunes library and renamed this file to "iTunes Library (Damaged) 4".  This happens everytime I start iTunes lateley.  Help!!!

    Everytime I open iTunes lately...I get all my music thrown out of the library and this annoying message come up...The file “iTunes Library.itl” does not appear to be a valid iTunes library file. iTunes has created a new iTunes library and renamed this file to “iTunes Library (Damaged) 4”.  Is this how an apple works?  It doesn't?  Why all of a sudden is it doing this?  Please help.  Thank you.
    David

    Did you happen to bring this iTunes library over from a windows machine? You might read this kb article to see if it helps http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1451

  • Why has this occurred The file "iTunes Library.itl" does not appear to be a valid iTunes library file. iTunes has created a new iTunes library and renamed this file to "iTunes Library (Damaged)".

    My itunes library suddenly that the file “iTunes Library.itl” does not appear to be a valid iTunes library file. iTunes has created a new iTunes library and renamed this file to “iTunes Library (Damaged)”. I use an external hard drive for my Itunes.

    The library file appears to have been corrupted.  You say you use your external drive but is the whole library on it or only your media?  No matter, you will have to rebuild the library file:
    iTunes: How to re-create your iTunes library and playlists - http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1451

  • Service item should not post to stock

    Dear Experts,
    I have the following scenario.
    I have a service material (DIEN). And created a PO with Account assignment M with SO. I have done the GR, accounting entries are posted as:
    + KBS --> CoGS
    - WRX --> GR/IR Clearing
    Account entries are correct. But when I check in MB52, stock is there as a special stock with E/SO number. But in my case, it should not post to stock.
    How to achieve this? Kindly explain please.
    Regards,
    Sham.

    Hello Biju,
    I am using the AAC as "C" now. It is working fine.
    I have an issue here. I will explain my scenrio. It is actually a trading process.
    we trade machines as well as the service (Implementation of the machine).
    1. Create Sales Order with Material and Service and it internally creates PR with 2 item to vendor X as follows.
       M MAT 1 EA
       C SRV 1 EA
    2. When we recive the material MAT, we do the GR, it goes to inventory.
    3. For the implementation of machine in the customer premise, we go with the vendor X and implement the machine.
    4. At this point, we do GR for service and accounting entry created in COGS for the service
       + KBS --> CoGS
       - WRX --> GR/IR Clearing
    5. Vendor X raise the invoce and we pay the vendor
    6. But the problem is, we invoice the customer after a month or two based on our terms with the customer. so until we bill the customer, the service cost is lying as cost in COGS expense account.
    Is there any way to clear it from expense account to some receivable account? And the receivable account should be nullified when we actually bill the customer.
    Kindly let me know, if I am not clear enough.
    regards,
    Sham.

  • Sales Order item should not be allowed to modify after doing PGI.

    Dear all SAP experts,
    When i create a sales order say for 10 pieces. Now I have created the delivery for all the 10 pieces & also created the invoice.
    My requirement is when i create a delivery for all 10 pieces then after doing the PGI the system should make the sales order line item & qty "grey" - I should not be able to change the sales order item in any respects.
    If not from delivery then when i save the invoice for that sales order then I should not be able to modify the sales order item & qty.
    With best regards,
    Allabaqsh G. Patil

    Hi
    I think there can be a problem in copy control
    In copy control at item level, in teh item category, ensure that the field "Update document flow" and the Pos/neg quantity are properly updated.
    Update document flow shoudl be ticked on
    Pos/neg quantity should be positive.
    Before doing this , check teh document flow of the sales order. Do the same after doign this configuration. Note the difference.
    This will solve your problem

  • Free of Charge (FOC)  items Should not be posted to Cost of sales

    Hi all,
    We are in ECC 6.
    SD Requirement: In sales order, we create  line  items.  Once DO is created , we post PGI. At this point
    Cr Stock A/C  19000  Dr Cost of sales 45000. We do not Dr GL 45000 for FOC items. We want to use another GL for this.
    How can I set up this?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi all, Tks for the solution.  Issue is resolved now.
    I have done following config  to get the desired outcome.
    Config Steps:
    MM Config:
    1.New mvt type 901 created by copying std mvt 601.
    2.In account grouping account modifier VAX was replaced by ZAX for WA01 -2 -GBB & WA03 -2 -GBB
    3.In OBYC Copy GBB-0001-VAX 3100 Old GL to GBB-0001-ZAX 3100  NewGL
    SD Config
    4.In VOV6 Maintain Sch line cat. Cretate Z2 by Copying CN   and change mvt type from 601 to 901
    No separate item cat or delivery type is created .
    Transaction Steps:
    1. VA01:Create Sales order with Two line items one with item cat TAN and second with item cat TANN.
       For line item 2, Change Sch line cat to Z2
    2. VL01N :Create delivery with std type LF > TO>Confirm-->PGI.
         Accounting entries, for first line item       Cr: Stock A/C Dr: cost of sales
                                         for second line item  Cr: Stock A/c Dr: New GL
    3.VF01: Billing doc created. Accounting entries Dr Trade Debtors Cr Sales Revenue

  • How to write validation in java sript item should not allow more than 20 ch

    HI,
    I need to write validation in java script for a item it should not allow more than 20 characters.
    Thanks
    Nr

    If this answers your question, please mark your question as answered (so everyone knows it is answered) and assign points where you see fit..
    Thank you,
    Tony Miller
    Webster, TX

  • Packing Material delivery item should not be send via EDI

    Hello experts,
    I am having a problem with a cross company process. One plant uses the automatic delivery item generation of packing material because they want to have them in stock. But the receiving plant does not have them in stock. So, what we did, we created new packing materials for example 8500 and 1500 for a euro palett.
    And on the EDI server we swith the packing material of the HU from 8500 to 1500, which works well.
    But the problem is the delivery item of the packing material which should not be adviced to the receiving plant.
    Do you know any User-Exit or customizing functionality in order to send only the real materials to the receiving plant?
    I use the SPED message as well as DESADV Idocs where I need to cut the packing materials.
    Thank you.
    Manuel
    Because nobody answered yet: Can you tell me if this idea does make sense or if I should follow another way?
    Has nobody yet had this same problem?

    I come to know from thread you do not need packing item in your stock.We did similar kind of packing process in our system.
    Our process also Cross company scenario .We have two SAP system .In one system they issue goods through an outbound delivery with packing information against SO.We will use the Goods issue information from other system to create Inbound delivery in other system.
    In the EDI file they send to us Pallet and Carton information along with file .So what we did we have created two packing articles ,One for carton and other one Pallet and these Values are maintained in TVARV table.
    We have used DESADV/DELVRY07 idoc to create inbound delivery.PI Creates the Inbound delivery Idoc with HU information from other system ,While posting the inbound delivery we  used our packing articles to pack the Inbound delivery items.

  • Item should not invoiced more then order value

    Hi my all friend and Laxmi
    I have one requirement where i want a item can not invoiced more then there order item value
    Please suggest me with your valueable suggestion

    Hi,
    T. Code: VTFA (Order-Bill Copy-Control Settings)
    Select Target Bill Doc and Source Sales Doc.
    Click: Item (Left Hand tree)
    Select Item category and Double Click.
    There is one Field: Billing quantity
    Please maintain appropriate selection (My suggestion "A" - Order to Bill ; else "B", if Delivery to Bill)
    Best Regards,
    Amit

  • Item should not duplicate in sales order form in line tab ..

    Hi All,
    Not very sure this is the right forum for this if not please tell me the correct forum to post this.
    We have a requirement(11.5.9) which we have to achieve it using custom.pll, as I am very much new to use it need help on this.
    In Sales Order form once we enter in Lines Information TAB,
    For example we will enter Item 'ABCD' at Line 1.1 then again at Line 2.1 if I try to enter the same item 'ABCD' it should pop up a message saying "Item Already Entered" once we press Tab on Ordered Item Field.
    If we enter a different Item it should take as usual.
    I will appreciate if some body posts the code for the same which we can do it using CUSTOM.pll
    Thanks in Advance
    Devender

    If you are in the WHEN-VALIDATE-ITEM trigger, you cannot navigate back through the list of already entered records (especially if record you are in is not complete). It does delay the validation, but duplicate checks are typically done by querying the database on both WHEN-VALIDATE-ITEM and PRE-INSERT/PRE-UPDATE triggers. This means when entering a new Sales Order, you won't be warned that Line 2 has the same item as Line 1 until you save, but there are no navigation required to avoid issues such as trying to leave the current record before it is valid.

  • Rejected items of RFQ should not appear in PO

    Dear Friends,
    In a given RFQ i will select/ reject some items but while processing PO with Reference to RFQ system should display only selected RFQ items (RFQ items which have rejection indicator should not appear in PO).
    validation has been kept for RFQ rejection items should not be converted to PO, but user has to delete the rejected line items manually which is time consuming.
    please suggest how to proceed.
    Thanks
    dmt

    Hi,
    In ME21N, you receive message 06 050 - "Purchase requisition & item &  already deleted".  This message can be changed to an error message via IMG transaction OME0.  The checks for the messages can only take place,             
    after adopting all positions (as well deleted ones).                                                                               
    To prevent this, please check to see if one of the following will help:                                                                               
    1) Select the checkbox 'Open only' on the selection screen for the overview. In this case, the deleted items will not appear on       
    the overview and therefore they cannot be adopted. Or,                                                                               
    2) If you do not want to have the purchase requisitions with deleted  items selected in ME21N, you can use the field "deletion indicator"  in the variant for your purchase requisitions, by excluding it in   the dynamic selections. 
    P.S. If you have maintained message 06 050 as E (error), the user will not able to save the PO (he can only hold it)                                                                               
    Regards,
    Mauro

  • If PO is created Or approved   reference PR,  should not allow to change th

    Dear All
    I have one requirement
    If PO is created Or approved   reference PR,  should not allow to change the quantity or line item.
    And is it possible to assign this to user specific whether to allow or not .
    Thanks in advance
    Mahisap

    Thanks for reply
    MY Requirements are
    1)A  PR line item should not be changed after creation of PO or after PO approved
    2)In case PR is referenced for multiple po's then should check all the po's
    3)if po line  item deleted then system should allow to change PR
    4) Assign it to user specific
    plz get me outoff this
    regards
    mahisap

  • User should not be allowed to change plant in SO once PR/PO is created

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    User has created the Purchase Request & Purchase Order for a sales order line item. After PR/PO creation user is able to change the plant. We need to stop that is there any standard configuration or setting by which i can stop the user to change the plant.
    System is giving the error if i am trying to delete the item since the PO exist but not stoping me to change the plant.
    Thanks
    Surender

    Hi,
    Standard setting is not available.You need to write the specific code in Sales order change exist by checking the VBEP -schedule line table where the PR exists.so for the line item the Plant should not be changeable.
    Sales Order Change exit the following requirement has to be incorporated.
    You can find the user exits in SPRO-Sales and DistributionSystem ModificationsUser Exits--User Exits for Order Processing.
    Regards,
    Saju.S

  • Firefighter Configuration - FF Owner should not change the configuration

    Hello Experts,
    We have requirement to restrict Firefighter configuration changes only to Firefighter Administrators.
    1. Restricting Firefighters to make any changes in Firefighter Configuration -- SAP Note 1101665 Superuser Security Role Modifies Tables - Successfully Achieved.
    2. Restricting Firefighter ID Owners (having /VIRSA/Z_VFAT_ID_OWNER) to make any changes in Firefighter Configuration --> Need your inputs on how to achieve this.
    We want that Firefighter ID Owners can only assign the FFID to Firefighters and assign a new controller only, but no following should be allowed to Firefighter Owners -->
    a. Creating a new owner for a FFID.
    b. Changing Firefighter configuration.
    c. Creating or changing Reason Codes.
    And which role should be assigned to Firefighter ID Controller?
    Looking forward to hear from your experiences.
    Thanks & Regards
    Davinderpal Singh

    Thanks Alpesh and Simon for your valuable inputs.
    My observations are, if you assign Firefighter Owner and Controller role only, then user is not able to make any configuration change, Reason Code change, etc, etc - behaviour is as expected.
    And in our case, this problem is coming as FF owners/controllers have been assignbed few other roles/profiles which seems to override the authorisations of FF owner role and allow changes in FF configuration.
    Now searching through each of these roles/profiles for extra set of authorisation objects is a huge security job.
    And we don't have much experience in Security - so as per your experiences what should be the best way to restrict FF owners to not make any change in FF configurations, without removing existing roles/profiles ( as we don't know what all would be removed if we remove all of these roles).
    Is it possible to specify a condition/check so that if a user has been assigned FF owner role, inspite of whatever extra permission he has - he should not be able to make configuration changes - please bear with me if i am expecting too much over here.
    Which authorisation objects controls FF configurations changes?
    Best Regards
    Davinderpal Singh

Maybe you are looking for