PO matching pricing tolerance

Hi!
Can anyone tell me the API or Function used to match a Purchase Order to an Invoice in Oracle Payables.
I need to use it to match only the amounts, taking into consideration pricing tolerance. My application uses a 3-Way tolerance.
In fact, i need to compare the price of PO in Euro currency to Invoice Amount in Euro. These 2 amounts are stored in Descriptive flex fields on PO and AP.
vik
Message was edited by:
Vik Awotar

Hi,
I'm not sure about the API, but you can do that yourself from a custom piece of code. 2-way matching essentially matches the PO Price to the Invoice Price and PO item qty to the Invoice item qty. This can be achieved by relating tables PO_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL and AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL. (This is a many to one relationship - the joining key being PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID). If you're upto 3-way matching, then over and above these two tables, you can relate RCV_TRANSACTIONS and AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL (This is also a many to one relationship - the joining key being RCV_TRANSACTION_ID) to match the Invoice item qty to item qty received against the PO in Inventory.
Regards,
Rakesh.

Similar Messages

  • Matching report tolerances

    Hi Forum,
    Can anyone advise on best practices in relation to the generation of a matching report and how best to hide balances less than a certain value ? I have a matching report written using evdre() but I have all the differences listed , ideally I would like to exclude any balance less than 100  EURO.
    Thanks,
    Brian

    We separated the expense account from the liability accounts - we also created a rule to capture the prior year YTD plug account balance in the current month.  This solved our issue.

  • Best Buy 100% Price Match Guarantee FAIL for Elite Plus member!!!

    So during the Black Friday weekend I purchased a Dyson vacuum at a store.  I understand that Best Buy does not match pricing DURING Black Friday weekend.  So on 12/15 Amazon had the vacuum on sale for $26 less than what I paid.  Again, this is not Black Friday weekend but the item was purchased over Black Friday weekend.  So I called in for Best Buy to match the price.  I spoke with someone who seemed like temp help.  It did not sound like she was in a call center and she didn't know much and seemed to be IM'n with someone to get answers.  After initially telling me they would not match the price because the item was purchased during Black Friday I explained that it was no longer Black Friday and Best Buy policy does not obsolve them from matching prices for the next 5-6 weeks (the return date is 1/15/2015) from all items purchased over Black Friday weekend.  If so, no one would buy during Black Friday.  She said she would submit the price match and I would get an email letting me know if it has been approved.  I was patient and waited 2 weeks and nothing.  I called back and was told that the price match department was swamped and to please be patient.  So I waited till today to call back for the return date is in 2 days and still no price match email.  I am now being told that Best Buy only matches their own pricing if not at the time of sale AND they only match the price that same day when they can confirm the price. (which makes sense)  I'm also being told my price match was never sent to the correct department so it has been sitting in case # purgatory for the past month.  Why is any of this my fault?!  I spend over $3500 per year, year after year and I'm supposed to get 'Elite' service.  I know more than the people I'm speaking with on the phone!  I called in with a legit lower price, waited patiently for Best Buy to match, have now spoken with 3 different reps, been told something different each time about the price match policy (every time they were wrong) and now I'm being told because it wasn't matched when they could confirm the price they won't match the price?!  What am I missing?!
    Total Price Match FAIL for Elite Plus member!!!  I can only image how people that aren't Elite are treated! :-)

    Dear iamkraz,
    Thank you for bringing us your business this holiday and for your continued loyalty to us as a My Best Buy Elite Plus customer. I am sorry if your recent experience has left you disappointed after the service you received. I would be happy to help clarify this for you.
    Per our Price Match Guarantee, “At the time of sale, we price match all local retail competitors (including their online prices) and we price match products shipped from and sold by these major online retailers: Amazon.com, Bhphotovideo.com, Crutchfield.com, Dell.com, HP.com, Newegg.com, and TigerDirect.com.” The only price match we would perform after the initial time of sale would be to a lower price in store or on BestBuy.com during your respective Return & Exchange period. You should have been provided with this as the reason for not receiving the price match when you were speaking with our support teams.
    My apologies for any confusion this caused. I would like to get some more details from you about the conversations you had so I may properly document this here at the corporate level for coaching and training. Please check your private messages by clicking on the envelope in the upper right-hand corner while you are logged into the forums.
    Regards,
    JD|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
     Private Message

  • Unlimited Indicator not copying to Purchase Order

    Hello experts,
    I'm running ECC 6.0 and am unable to solve this.  I have subcontracting info-records for materials that specify a material to a vendor, pricing, tolerances, etc.
    In the Purch. Org 1 screen of info-record view, I can see the tolerances are maintained (5% under and unlimited over-delivery for example).  The 5% under is copying when a purchase order is created for the material in question, but the unlimited over-delivery indicator is not copying.  If I clear out the indicator and maintain an actual over-delivery tolerance, it copies just fine.  Only the indicator is failing to copy from the info-record.
    Any familiarity with how to solve this issue?
    Kind Regards,
    Kelby

    Hello Kelby,
    Even if nothing is maintained in the material master plant(purchasing view) the unlimited tick should default from the PIR. PIR always has a higher priority than master as it is specific to material+vendor. The help for the 'unlimited' tick in the PIR mentions this.
    You can have a look at this note. It is very old and probably not valid for your release. However this is the only note I could find. You should probably raise an OSS message.
    https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361…

  • PO Matching Tolerances

    What's the best way to ensure that PO tolerances are applied to invoices? For example, suppose I complete a PO for 500 items, but get billed for 1,000. If the payables clerk forgets to match the invoice to the PO, my tolerances won't be applied and the invoice might get approved and paid by mistake. Can anyone recommend a method for avoiding this situation?
    Thanks,
    Nate Fong

    hi,
    You can go to change mode in Me22n and can directly change the overdivery tolerance as per your requirement and post the next one for the additional qty...
    Pls check..
    Hope it helps..
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • Job Pricing - Match SAP fields to survey data

    I am in the process if importing my survey data and matching the fields and pay categories.  Are we able to use a SAP field name more than once for the columns within the survey data?  Example I have three sections listing the number of incumbents contributing to base pay, total compensation and bonus.  So for these three fields I select Number of Incumbents Contributing to Survey Data.  I am getting errors stating I have the SAP Number of Incumbents Contributing to Survey Data listed more than once.  Any thoughts or ideas?
    Thanks.

    It appears that an SAP field can't be mapped twice.  Split up the survey file into multiple files.

  • Post Purchase Pricing Matching on items with a free instant giftcard

    If I purchase a $100 item pre-tax from BB in-store and it comes with a free $25 instant giftcard then the following week(under 15 days) BB drops the price to $50. Am I able to bring my receipt to get the $50 difference back or would the giftcard offer somehow be affected? When games that are part of the $10 pre-order/purchase promo go on sale within 15 days the customer doesn`t have to forfeit any portion on the $10 no matter what the price of the game has dropped to.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi again enuf,
    Kst8no1 is correct here: bundle offers, including free gift card offers, are excluded from our Low Price Guarantee and price match policy. To receive the lower price, you would be required to return the gift card you received with your initial purchase. For more information, I'd encourage you to refer to the following page:
    BestBuy.com > Help Center > Low Price Guarantee
    http://bbyurl.us/LPGFAQ
    I hope this helps.
    Aaron|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
     Private Message

  • Transaction BORGR: No tolerance on goods receipt for Kanban calloff

    Hello,
    we have the following situation:
    - MM scheduling agreement with tolerance of 10% for under and overdelivery, production supply "summarized JIT call" is set.
    - KANBAN cycle has 1 empty container with a summarized JIT call for replenishment, quantity 10 pieces.
    - ASN has been created with BORGR transaction, it contains: 1 line item for the material with delivery quantity 9 pieces, assigned to this line item is the JIT call with notified quantity 9 pieces as well.
    My expectation was that the JIT call can be booked with 9 pieces as it is inside the 10% tolerance defined for the scheduling agreement. In addition, I expected the KANBAN container be set to full.
    Instead, the following error message is given:
    'Post GR' carried out without success
    (Message no. BORGR215)
    Because of previous error, dispatching is not possible for ID 0180573431
    (Message no. /SPE/ID_HANDLING011)
    Inbound Delivery 0180573431 00010
    (Message no. BORGR210)
    Total of the summarized JIT calls does not match the current delivery qty
    (Message no. BORGR540)
    Changing the delivery quantity and the notified JIT quantity to 10 pieces, the goods receipt is booked correctly.
    I only found the following notes that deal with tolerances but they are outdated, as we are using DIMP release 603:
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/393421
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/508215
    Has anybody faced a similar problem or can help me with this?
    Thanks!

    Hello Jiaul,
    Sorry I may have mislead you.  The actual error message is "Goods Receipt for Production Order XXXX can only be made on 2010.08.25 to 2010.08.27".  These two dates are the Start Date and FInish Date for the Production Order in CO03, 
    The Basic Start Date for the current Production Order is  2010.08.25
    The Basic Finish Date for the current Production Order is 2010.08.27
    I think what it means is that you can only Post Goods Receipt for the Production Order only after the Basic Start Date of the Production Order.  Do you know where I can find the configuration for this message?
    Thanks

  • Nfe parada no GRC. Erro validação: Valor da nf negativo. Pricing desabilita

    O usuário fez uma nola fiscal no ECC 5.0 onde o valor do desconto do produto superou o preço do item, portanto a nota fiscal ficou negativa. O usuário não percebeu o erro. Finalizou o processo de faturamento encaminhando para o GRC.
    A nfe gerou erro de validação no GRC. Veja o log:
    Erro de validação: campo BC do ICMS. This field does not match the expected format. (campo IS_NFE_HEADER-S1_VBC, ID campo W003)
    Erro de validação: campo Valor Total dos produtos e serviços. This field does not match the expected format. (campo IS_NFE_HEADER-S1_VPROD, ID campo W007)
    Erro de validação: campo Base Amount in NF-e. This field does not match the expected format. (campo IT_NFE_ITEM_TAB-L1_00_VBC, ID campo N015)
    Erro de validação: campo Net Value. This field does not match the expected format. (campo IT_NFE_ITEM_TAB-VPROD, ID campo I011)
    Status do processo: 01 Recebido do sistema back end
    Status do erro: 10 Erro de Validação.
    Na transação J1BNFE o usuário não consegue estornar, porque a nota não foi para a Sefaz. Também não consegue corrigir a pricing para reenviar a nota.
    Peço ajuda e agradeço desde já.
    Att. Ronaldo Figueiredo
    Moinho Sul Mineiro.

    Bom dia Ronaldo,
    NF-es com erro de validação podem ser inutilizadas pela mesma opção de cancelamento na J1BNFE.
    Qual o motivo de o usuário não conseguir solicitar o cancelamento?
    Atenciosamente, Fernando Da Rö

  • Best buy won't price match my ps4 destiny bundle after It went down 349.99

    Hello how are you doing? I recently bought an item from you guys, my order number is {removed per forum guidelines}. Specifically I am referring to sku:6731019. Within a few days after I purchased the item and most certainly within the return/exchange period the price was reduced by $50.00. Today December 26th 2014 I called customer service regarding price matching this so that I could be given the $50.00 difference but instead I was told that due to that fact that the best buy website is showing that it is not available as per the price match policy I won't be able to get the priced matched. Please keep in mind I am not asking you guys to honor a competitor's price on an out of stock item, I am just asking that you guys honor your OWN price which changed less than a week after my purchase. Although your policy may be written in black and white, life isn't and I am asking that you guys to review my case in isolation and honor the price. I can't help but wonder if you guys purposely altered the page so that it won't even show a price and just show that it is no longer available. Actually what does that mean? Will it be available again in the near future or you no longer carry the item?  And if it will become available again why wouldn't a simple out of stock label suffice until stock is replenished? I am in no way saying that I know anything about your Web design practices but I think my question is a fair one. Today I spent over an hour on the phone with customer service reps who told me that they can't do anything to resolve my issue as a customer and i also spoke with a supervisor named Kyle who insisted that that was the bottom line and he just can't help me and there was absolutely no one above him I could speak to regarding my case. Apparently he is the CEO. I am hoping however that this email will not go unanswered and I will get my issue resolved based on the simple fact that there is a record that I bought the item at one price from you guys and it went down fifty dollars less within the return period. The fact that I didn't call 10 seconds after you lowered the price and before people flocked to it causing it to sell out quickly shouldn't play a role in your decision. You guys need to make this right. You blocked the website from showing it right now but it is all over the Internet that it was 349.99 and if you Google destiny bundle best buy you see the 349.99 price in the preview of the result.

    Hello noreik,
    I was disappointed to read that we weren't able to honor the price match request you made. Please know that I apologize for having disappointed you.
    In looking into your concern, I note that your request was made after the product's sale price had expired and the product was no longer available. Per the terms of our Price Match Guarantee, products eligible for price match must be currently in stock and the sale price in effect. Given these requirements were not met, we would not be able to offer you the price match. I regret that I do not have better news.
    Thank you for writing to us with your concerns.
    Sincerely,
    John|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
     Private Message

  • Pricing condition types in SRM 7.0

    Hi,
    We are using SRM 7.0, we have decided to go ahead with the pricing proceedure and the condition types which are there in ECC the same should be replicated to SRM.
    We have created the same pricing proceedure and the calculation scheema in SRM.
    Now my requirement is when i create a PO with the conditions and when i am transfering to ECC the PO should also be with the condition types. It should be a similar PO in ECC.
    Is this can be addressed.

    Hello All,
    As I have already mentioned the condition types in SRM are identically matched to ERP condition type hence the data is flowing correctly and even the idoc has the z-condition type Z123.The IDOC in backend ERP has status 53.
    On trial and error method we did unchecked the manual indicator check in the pricing schema for the relevant condition type and because of that now the Z-condiiton type can be seen in the backend ERP contract.
    If the indicator was checked, this means that this condition can be maintained only manually (directly in the transaction
    ME32K in ECC) and nothing can be transfer from other source.
    Note: If the same condition type is being used in more than one pricing procedure then ensure that the check bok is unchecked for agianst the relevant condition type.
    Thanks,
    Yatin

  • EBS Customer open items automatic clearing within tolerances

    Hi Experts,
    We have already implemented Elecronic Bank Statements automatic uploading functionality.  As part of this process, customer open items need to be cleared automatically. 
    As per the standard process, SAP will be able to clear off the open items ONLY if the collection amount (reflected in MT940) is exactly equal to the invoice amount (reflected in the open item).  But general practical situation is that customers may under / over pay.  For example, if the customer invoice is for USD 100,005 the actual payment from the customer could be for USD 100,000.  In this case, it is normal business practice that open item will be cleared off rather than keeping balance USD 5 in ledger and chasing the customer.
    So tolerances are already set up both at GL account level (Trans OBA4) and customer level (Trans OBA3) with blank tolerance group with permitted payment difference of USD 15.  And no tolerance group is assigned to the customer master.  Also account determination is maintained for the differences with nil reason code.
    Inspite of all these settings, I am getting an error message indicating that the difference is too large for clearing while trying to upload this bank statement.  Here the difference is only USD 5.
    My doubts are:
    1. Does the standard EBS program RFEBKA00 considers the permitted payment difference tolerances set in transaction OBA4 and OBA3 ?  I don't need to post the differences with reason code.  That's why account determination is maintained with blank reason code as well. 
    2. SAP Note 124655 (Point No 3) says that entering reasons for differences is not possible in the standard system through EBS.  Does that mean clearing of open items WITHOUT reason code is possible ?
    3. SAP Note 549277 (Point No 5) says that even though Note 124655 specifies certain functionalities as not supported in standard system, they can be achieved by customer through user exits.  Does that mean it is possible to code in the user exit saying that system should consider the payment difference tolerances for clearing off of the open items ?
    Could you kindly let me know your experience with these questions.  I will be very glad to hear from you.  Thanks for your time.
    Warm regards,
    Sridhar

    Hi Experts,
    I got this resolved by using the enhancement FEB00001.  If the field "Distribute by age" is activated through this enhancement, then system will be able to match the paid amount and the combination of open items for automatic clearing.  If there is no exact match, then automatic clearing through FF.5 is not possible as indicated in SAP Note 124655.
    There is no more necessity to use BAdI FIEB_CHANGE_BS_DATA.  Complete relevant logic can be maintained directly in the enhancement itself.
    Have a nice day.
    Regards,
    Sridhar

  • Invoices matched to the same line on the same PO going on Hold

    Hi,
    We have started to setup some of our suppliers to use iSupplier, to automate the process of shipping and invoicing. With some suppliers, once they create the ASBN/Invoice the goods may take up to 30 days for delivery. Invoice are being automatically imported into AP to be matched to the same open PO (same line and item). When Invoice validation runs (nightly), these Invoices are going on hold as at any point in time we may not have received the total goods for which we are invoicing, even though we may have received the total matching to the first invoice. This is intended functionality that tolerance level checks are only made at the PO Shipment level and not at the Distribution level. However, the intention of introducing iSupplier was to automate the invoicing process does anyone know if there's a way of avoiding having this invoices go on hold ?
    Thanks,
    Regina.

    Check that you still have the "Bookmarks Toolbar items" placed on the Bookmarks Toolbar
    * Make sure that you have the "Bookmarks Toolbar" visible: "View > Toolbars"
    * Check in "View > Toolbars > Customize" that the "Bookmarks Toolbar items" is on the Bookmarks Toolbar
    * If the "Bookmarks Toolbar items" is not on the Bookmarks Toolbar then drag it back from the Customize window onto the Bookmarks Toolbar
    * If you do not see the "Bookmarks Toolbar items" then click the "Restore Default Set" button
    You can only move the content from a toolbar onto other toolbars if all toolbars support that feature. You need to check that in the options of each toolbar.

  • ITunes Match - and my departure from Apple

    I am a music enthusiats.  I bought my frist CD in 1990, about 2 years before I even owned a CD Player.  My cassette tape collection was in the thousands and I kne it was only a matter of time before I made the switch to the new technology.  Oh ya, and I was only 12 years old at the time. 
    So jumping forward to 2007 my music collection was in excess of 10,000 CD's.  And here comes the iPhone.  Up to that point I had used non-Apple products to carry my music around not becasue they functioned better, but becasue they offered the huge capacity at much lower prices.  But now I was getting older, thiking more about simplicity and the abiltiy to have everything I needed in one device.  Sure I had to routinely shuffle around what music I was carrying with me, but simplicty and ease of use had become important to me.
    Now jump forward even further to 2011 and the introduction of iTunes Match.  What a perfect solution for me.  I could now carry around almost half my library and I no longer had to shell extra money for the highest storage capacity iPhone.  It was a "Match" made in heaven.  In fact I was so happy I made the full switch over the next year or so.  I ditched my Windows PC for a Macbook Pro.  I dumped my barely funtional Logitech Revue for an Apple TV.  I gave away my low end entry level Android Tablet for an iPad.  Over those twelve months my house became an Apple house.  And then, Apple got left in the dust......
    Today, direct competitors to Apple are producing smartphones that have specs that far surpass the iPhone.  Those competitors are selling media content and services that rival iTunes in quality, and beat it heavily in pricing.  And that is where I stand at this point.  I am at a crossroads. 
    But as I stated at the start, I love music.  It is my biggest psychological and emotional driver in life.  So my question is, can we get options for additional capacity with iTunes Match?  I would pay more than $24.99 for increased capacity with iTunes Match even tthough other competitors offer more capacity at that same $24.99 price point.  My subscription expires on the last day of this month.  I have downloaded my collection out of iCloud in anticipation of needing to move it over to another service.  And once I do that I will begin to have to make other considerations.  I switched my cellphone plan to one of these no-contract options that the major carrier I'm on offers, for the purpose of bringing the monthly cost down.  I'm ready for a new phone and can see very good options out there that I can pay for in full (rather than finance), which would save me a tone of money over getting a new iPhone at full price.  But again, it all starts with the music for me.  Financing a new iPhone because I was able to get greater storage capacity with iTunes Match is far more prefable at the moment than going with the competition. 
    So not to beat a dead horse, but please increase the capacity for iTunes Match, even if it means having to pay more.

    pezzman77 wrote:
    So my question is, can we get options for additional capacity with iTunes Match?
    No. Not at this time.

  • Dialog progg....(matching Field values from Table)

    Dear All,
                     I have one screen 0100.
    At any stage, a field value entered in the screen field by user, should be matched from say EKBE table value with tolerance of  10-15%.
    If it doesn't matches, Error message should display in  a dialog box.
    Any suggestions, pls.
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi,
    In PAI we can do this validation.
    example :
    In screen flow logic add CHAIN ..... ENDCHAIN and a module to validate the field
    PROCESS AFTER INPUT.
      CHAIN.
        FIELD g_banfn.
        FIELD g_bnfpo MODULE validate_g_banfpo.
      ENDCHAIN.
    And in Module validate according to your codition.
    MODULE validate_g_banfpo INPUT.
    * Validation.
    Select ....
    from ekbe
    where some field = entered field on screen (e.g p_number)
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    * if entered value is not present in table give an error message.
        MESSAGE e133.
      ENDIF.
    ENDMODULE.                 " VALIDATE_G_BANFPO  INPUT
    thanks.
    Edited by: Dhanashri Pawar on Dec 2, 2008 12:48 PM

Maybe you are looking for