Point-2-Point Connection Speed

Hello,
We are using a point-2-point connection, 2611 and 1760. Connection speed has been unbelievable slow, ran a "show int" and noticed quiet of few drops. I am a newbie and would like someone to point me in the right direction on where to start the troubleshooting prodcedures, would appreciate it. The e0/0 is are redundancy connection. Here is my show int post.
Serial1/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is PQUICC with Fractional T1 CSU/DSU
Description: Cox point-to-point to Parkwest
Internet address is 192.168.23.10/30
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 7/255, rxload 26/255
Encapsulation HDLC, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 852
Queueing strategy: weighted fair
Output queue: 0/1000/64/820 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
Conversations 0/26/256 (active/max active/max total)
Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
Available Bandwidth 1158 kilobits/sec
5 minute input rate 179000 bits/sec, 26 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 47000 bits/sec, 24 packets/sec
140277729 packets input, 246331714 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 1453268 broadcasts, 0 runts, 12 giants, 0 throttles
322261272 input errors, 10815 CRC, 72091 frame, 0 overrun, 3 ignored, 322178358 abort
128315056 packets output, 3481037074 bytes, 3 underruns
3 output errors, 0 collisions, 1939 interface resets
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
43 carrier transitions
DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up
Ethernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is PQUICC Ethernet, address is 000d.28dc.7f6f (bia 000d.28dc.7f6f)
Description: Cont. Wireless connection to Parkwest
Internet address is 10.1.35.5/29
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Half-duplex, 10BaseT
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:19:17, output 00:00:05, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 91
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue :0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
104661829 packets input, 3244614507 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 1167 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
2569 input errors, 0 CRC, 2245 frame, 8 overrun, 316 ignored
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
92195243 packets output, 3499224551 bytes, 2 underruns
316 output errors, 854809 collisions, 1 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 1808906 deferred
314 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

Hello,
since the interface counters have never been cleared, it is kind of hard to tell how fast these errors are actually increasing, but the number of input and crc errors, as well as the amount of interface resets points to some problem with either the hardware, or the provider side of the circuit.
The output drops would actually tell you that you are trying to send too much data over the line, and the traffic is being dropped, which would not necessarily mean a problem with the equipment...
Regards,
GP

Similar Messages

  • Mimo access points with Static WEP security do not allow connection speeds above 54mbps

    I am getting this message:
    Access Connections - Mimo access points with Static WEP security do not allow connection speeds above 54mbps
    If I switch from WEP to WAP i do not get the message but I still only get 54mbps speed.  I have a Linksys Wireless-N Broadband Router.  Is there a setting that I am missing???

    Yes you need to use WPA-AES or WPA2-AES, or no encryption, to go faster than 54Mbps. This is part of the 802.11n spec.
    That's not so bad, because if you have the right 802.11n card and use the right settings you can go up to 300Mbps!
    What bites is that the 802.11n card which comes with X-Series ThinkPads is the Intel 4965AGN. It does not support the broader 802.11n 40MHz channel width option, limiting the top speed to 130Mbps .
    The new ThinkPads based on the Montevina/Centrino 2 platform will most likely use the Intel WiFi Link 5100/5300 802.11n/WiMax cards, which I hope will fix this, coz I'm going to buy one!
    I don't work for Lenovo. I'm a crazy volunteer!

  • How to set up a point to point connection in 4 sites

    Hi all.
    I'm investigating the option of set up a point to point connection around 4 sites.
    I will call Site01, Site02, Site03 and Site04.
    Site01 will be the main one with a Main Domain Controller.
    Site02, Site03 and Site04 will be the Secondary Domain Controllers.
    I need to install an VPN Router on each Site to create a full VPN Network, I mean, All the computers should see the other computers.
    I need some support about it.
    I suppose that I have to config like this:
    Site01 with VPNRouter01 will have the IP range 192.168.1.X.
    Site02 with VPNRouter02 will have the IP range 192.168.2.X.
    Site03 with VPNRouter03 will have the IP range 192.168.3.X.
    Site04 with VPNRouter04 will have the IP range 192.168.4.X.
    If I config on each VPNRouter 3 point to point VPN connection is the only config that I have to do?
    I mean, is not neccesary to config anything else?
    I suppose that for example, the client with IP 192.168.1.10 should have the following IP address as well:
    192.168.2.10
    192.168.3.10
    192.168.4.10
    Is this neccesary to see all the clients on the remote networks?
    Thanks and best regards.

    HI,
    Try the below
    1) Configure site to site vpn from all the three site to the HUB site.
    2) Configure ospf or any dynamic routing protocol on the vpn, thus you will have routes of site1, site2 and site3 in site4 and visaversa.
    Once you have the connectivity established you can access any computers from any site.

  • All about Point-Point Connection

    Hi All,
    I have read this point in the disscussion abt why we need XI
    1. right now you are using point to pont connection which is not the best way.
    I know that the concept of ALE which is used to send the IDOC's from SAP-Non-SAP and Vice versa.This is working on Point to point conection.
    Q1) Then on which basis XI is working. Is it is Point -Multi point concept??
    Q2) What is the Dis Advantages of using the Poin--Point conection
    Q3) What are the Advantages of avoiding the point point connection by using XI
    Regards
    Suman

    Hi,
    instead of having point to point connections between systems you connect all systems with the XI.
    For example if you have four systems A, B, C and D.
    If you have point to point connections between all of them it will look like:
    A - B
    A - C
    A - D
    B - C
    B - D
    C - D
    With XI it will look like:
    A - XI
    B - XI
    C - XI
    D - XI
    So one advantage is that you will have less connections.
    Another advantage is that if System A changes you have to adjust three connections in case of point to point.
    With XI you have only to change one connection.
    A further advantage is to have central point to configure and monitor your connections between the systems.
    Some more informations:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f79be190-0201-0010-96b9-f00ef2ac00df
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/50fc0e7e-bd11-2a10-85a0-966fb8ec21cc
    Regards
    Patrick

  • Support for TLS-DSK Authentication in UCMA End Point connections?

    The Lync servers support NTLM, Kerberos, TLS-DSK as supported Authentication Protocols.
    However, it appears that  UCMA API when used in the End Point connection mode does not provide an option to use TLS-DSK as an authentication scheme.  Is there any way to connect to a Lync server that only supports TLS-DSK as an authentication protocol?
    //etc
                _collabPlatform = new CollaborationPlatform(clientPlatformSettings);
                _collabPlatform.AllowedAuthenticationProtocol = SipAuthenticationProtocols.None;   //Authentication protocol limitation -- TLS-DSK not available.
    UCFin

    No, UCMA only supports NTLM/Kerberos.  TLS-DSK requires HTTP requests which UCMA can not currently handle.

  • Cheep solution for SHDSL routers for Point to Point Connectivity

    Please give me best solution and cost effective solution for SHDSL routers for Point to Point Connectivity.

    Already replied in another thread, please do not open duplicates.

  • SHDSL routers for Point to Point Connectivity

    Could please light me what is best option for SHDSL point to point connectivity.
    Alos please comapre the WAN interface card below which should I choose for SHDSL connection:
    Cisco 1-Port G.SHDSL WAN Interface Card (part number WIC-1SHDSL-V3)
    Cisco 2-Pair G.SHDSL HWIC (HWIC-2SHDSL)
    Cisco 4-Pair G.SHDSL HWIC (HWIC-4SHDSL)

    Already replied in another thread, please do not open duplicates.

  • Aironet 1500 series point to point connection

    Hello, I have a question for cisco Aironet 1500 series. I want to connect two of them as point to point in a distance about 6 km (kilometers). So there are two questions, can them be connected as point to point to transmit signal and the second one what is the max distance of AP to be connected.
    Kind regards,
    Ardit

    There are a lot of factors when it comes to an outdoor bridge connection. What kind of traffic is going to pass over that link? How much bandwidth do you need? Is there an free line of sight and can you place the (high gain) external antennas somewhere high or maybe even in an tower? And what about the factors you can't influence like the weather?
    I personally don't have experience with this kind of high distances, but if you are going to do an test I would advise to go for the 1570 bridges and select an high gain antenna. A good starting-point for outdoor point-to-point connections is Cisco's WNG Coverage Capacity Calculator. You can also use tis tool to calcuate your Effective Isotropic Radiated Power, which should not exceed the rules dictated by your regulatory domain.

  • Lumia 620 - connection speed to router ( BT (UK) H...

    I have a UK BT Home Hub 2b.
    My nettbook connects to it at either 54Mbps or occasionally 104Mbps, as reported by the router. The speed is usually 54 but occasionally when close to the router (or maybe on 'low noise' days) it hits 104.
    My 620 always connects at 39Mbps as reported by the router never faster and never slower. Even if I'm right by the router or at the other end of the house, its 39Mbps as reported by the router.
    This seems odd to me that the netbook, a few years old now, seems to connect faster than a phone purchased in the last month. I know 39Mbps is probably fast enough in reality for a phone, but was wondering if others have seen this speed differenece or if I have a setting somewhere incorrectly set (either on the router or the phone), or maybe the phone is faulty?
    The networks is set for 'n' working. I have asked BT who were of little help.
    Any ideas?
    Any Lumia 620 people on a BT hub of any type getting similar speeds (39Mbps) or connecting at faster speeds?
    Thanks in advance.

    aleisha11,
    Thanks for the reply. I was more hoping that others would share their typical connection speeds. I realise its not (probably) possibly to make direct comparissons between a netbook and a phone, but they are the only two bits of wireless kit I have.
    I only asked, because tucked away in the NOKIA FAQs was this gem:
    When connecting Nokia mobile device (e.g. N8-00) to a WLAN access point using the IEEE 802.11n mode, connectivity issues have been observed with access points from certain vendors. Problems have been observed with at least the following WLAN products:
    FritzBox 7270
    Livebox 2
    BT HomeHub V2.0 Type B
    Netgear DGN1000
    The issue is related to a WLAN chip used in these access points. To solve the problems, it is recommended to upgrade the access point firmware to the latest version.
    If there is no firmware update available or the update doesn't help, the workaround is to disable the 802.11n mode and force the access points to use just the 802.11b/g mode.
    And as it doesn't mention the specifics or the BT HH2b software level, I just wondered if the lower speed had an impact on my main issue - http://betalabs.nokia.com/trials/play-to-for-wp8/D​iscussion/Play-to-lumia-620-DLNA-panasonic-video-s​...
    I'd still be interested in anyone typical router connection speed if they would care to share.

  • Ridiculous Connection Speeds

    Hi All,
    Following issues with line noise which have gone since removing the front plate from my OpenReach master socket and plugging directly in there, I now have an issue with really poor latency and speeds. I don't want to have to restart the HH3 as it's been up for over 3 days now (a record) which is strange as the HH3 shows uptime of 2days 4hrs - last IP change was 26/4 15:33.
    Speedtest
    IP Profile = 2Mb
    Download Speed = 0.3Mb
    Upload Speed = 0.12Mb
    Latency = 432ms
    ADSL Stats
    Connection Information
    Line state: Connected
    Connection time: 2 days, 03:55:18
    Downstream: 2.212 Mbps
    Upstream: 1.094 Mbps
    ADSL Settings
    VPI/VCI: 0/38
    Type: PPPoA
    Modulation: G.992.5 Annex A
    Latency type: Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up): 28.1 dB / 6.7 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up): 31.1 dB / 18.3 dB
    Output power (Down/Up): 17.9 dBm / 12.7 dBm
    FEC Events (Down/Up): 0 / 0
    CRC Events (Down/Up): 24 / 1268
    Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
    Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
    Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
    HEC Events (Down/Up): 4 / 7450
    Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 63 / 22872
    Do the line stats make any sense? Could this be a HH3 issue? Am I just expecting too much?
    Can anybody point me in a direction that will help me solve this as this has been a rather black comedy since the install on 4/4 - especially as I have to pay for this.
    Cheers,
    Ian

    Hi klinkenhoff,
    Your IP Profile would be about 2mbps as it's 88.2% of your current connection speed which was 2.212 Mbps from your last set of adsl stats.
    Your throughput speed is the speed you experience when using the Internet and is also the speed which speed test websites use.
    Your throughput speed will be slightly slower than your IP Profile and can be effected by how you connect to your router/home hub such as Wifi or Ethernet and also network traffic and congestion.
    So:
    1) Your connection speed is the speed which your homehub/router and the local exchange is connected at.
    2) Your IP Profile is a speed limit applied to your broadband service by the local exchange. Its purpose is to ensure the exchange doesn't 'overload' your broadband service by sending more data down your phone line than it (or your BT Home Hub, router or modem) can physically handle. 
    As your on ADSL2+ your IP Profile will always be 88.2% of your connection speed.
    3) Your throughput speed is the speed you experience when using the Internet and is also the speed which speed test websites show, it can be effected by how you connect to your router/home hub such as Wifi or Ethernet and also network traffic and congestion
    Hope that makes sense.
    Cheers
    I'm no expert, so please correct me if I'm wrong

  • Cisco 1130 AP connection speed?

    What speed do Cisco 1130AG access points connect to the network via the Ethernet port? Is it a 10/100 connection or does it support gigabit? I've searched and can't seem to find this information. Thanks!

    Hi Lillie,
    If you want an AP with 10/100/1000BaseTx copper uplink then 1140 or 1250 is your way to go.
    Data Sheet Cisco Aironet 1140 Series Access Point
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps10092/datasheet_c78-502793.html
    Data Sheet Cisco Aironet 1250 Series Access Point Data Sheet
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps6973/ps8382/product_data_sheet0900aecd806b7c5c.html
    If you are going to choose the 1250, note that the Antennaes are optional. Here's some information regarding them.
    Antenna Product Portfolio for Cisco Aironet 1250 Series Access Points
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps7183/ps469/at_a_glance_c45-513837.pdf
    The AP1250, when operating with 2 radio modules on Autonomous IOS, requires a minimum of 18.5 watts (ePoE). So you'll need either a Power Injector or PoE switch that will support enhanced PoE such as the 3560-E or 3750-E.
    802.11n Design and Deployment Guidelines
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns394/ns348/ns767/white_paper_80211n_design_and_deployment_guidelines.html
    Hope this helps.

  • Wireless connection speed fluctuating:  please help if you can.

    Hi there,
    I have a problem with wireless Internet connection speed which spinning my head off, I desperately need other people advice please.
    My AirPort Express (AirTunes) serves the flat with Internet, two pc’s and an iMac (Intel Chip). The first pc is a sony laptop that has the Centrino platform (i.e. Wireless ready) and the other pc has an internal D-Link Air DWL-510 wireless PCI (IEEE 802.11b)
    The laptop seems to get the maximum speed of the internet connection anytime anywhere in the flat, the iMac gets 70% of the connection speed. While the PC with DWL-510 gets only 30 – 40% of the connection speed only. However, sometimes all the sudden, both the iMac & the PC will get the maximum speed as it should! On a random bases.
    I am puzzled trying to establish why is that happening? what could it possibly be that is curbing the connection speed to start with? And what changes that sometimes the pc will get the full connection speed? I have a wireless phone at home, I have a wireless temperature controller as well, and there are wooden walls dividing the rooms in between. I tried switching the wireless devices on and off but the results produced had no affect. My AirPort Express is password protected, so (most likely) no one is steeling my bandwidth. So, what else am missing? What other factors that causing this fluctuation in my internet connection!!?? Please advice if you can think of anything?
    Many thanks.
    iMac G5   Mac OS X (10.4.4)   iMac 17' 1.8 MHz PowerPC 1.25 mb RAM

    hello Satchmo.. thanks a lot for your reply.
    In regards to the first point (ISP connection), I agree. When I tried to test the line some time ago (on a wired link) I noticed the fluctuation, but it was acceptable. The problem I have now is that the 2mb connection I have, this particular pc receives only 600kb (+/- 10% variable), where is the other 1.4mb going? Sometimes, all the sudden I notice my connection go mad and I get the full speed for a while! I don't know what has changed from the surroundings.
    The other things you mentioned (source of influence i.e. other wireless networks that might be crossing mine, bluetooth devices and Ethernet port is used while the wireless is in use) all are viable possibilities. I’ll start testing to check if any of ‘em is the case. Especially other wireless networks, cause its seems that my wireless card discovers at least other two connections along side to mine. I guess if it was the case, nothing much I’ll be able to do about it.
    Also thnx for the link.. I don’t understand why I failed to find it when I searched the net!!
    iMac G5   Mac OS X (10.4.4)   iMac 17' 1.8 MHz PowerPC 1.25 mb RAM

  • Super Slow Connection speed

    Hi all, with any luck someone here will be able to offer some wisdom!
    Until recently my broadband has been faultless (well not bad anyway), in the last week or so it seems to have nosedived in terms of performance, and I am struggling to work out why. I have been through India, and I have my modem plugged into the test port of the master socket, here is wat things look like in the Hub Manager:
    Line state
    Connected
    Connection time
    0 days, 0:53:56
    Downstream
    8,126 Kbps
    Upstream
    440 Kbps
    VPI/VCI
    0/38
    Type
    PPPoA
    Modulation
    ITU-T G.992.5
    Latency type
    Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up)
    20.3 dB / 32.9 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up)
    10.0 dB / 4.2 dB
    Output power (Down/Up)
    0.0 dBm / 12.0 dBm
    Loss of Framing (Local)
    34
    Loss of Signal (Local)
    3
    Loss of Power (Local)
    0
    FEC Errors (Down/Up)
    0 / 4294967264
    CRC Errors (Down/Up)
    0 / 2147480000
    HEC Errors (Down/Up)
    nil / 0
    Error Seconds (Local)
    3
    The three errors are me pulling the cable out to rest the conenction. The massive FEC / CRC errors are a bug I think. Does anyone know about Loss of Framing and what 0dBm output power are?
    I ran the BT speedtest and got some truly terrible results, which said that my profile was 7000kbps, good, and my download was 146kbps, bad.
    Anyone know what might be causing my super slow connection? I disconnected all computers barring my laptop in case somethign was secretly thrashing the service, but it didnt help.
    Thanks in advance,
    Mark.

    I have similar problems. My connection was fine until about a week ago, when I started getting noise on my phone.
    This has now been fixed, but since then, my Broadband connection speed has dropped from around 2M to 135k. I had an engineer out this morning to check what had been fixed during the first engineer visit (to fix the phone) and once he'd finished, he tested in to the socket to find that he could get 7M speeds. However, since he's been gone, I've plugged my setup back in and still get speeds of 135k.
    I've tried removing phone connection so only router plugged in, I've changed filter to see if that was the issue - only things I've not yet tried because they are more hassle first off is trying another ADSL cable and/or a new router
    My Hub manager shows the following, but not sure if this helpful to anyone, or if anyone can point me in the right direction of other things to try, I'd be greatly appreciative.
    Thanks
    ADSL line status
    Connection information
    Line state
    Connected
    Connection time
    0 days, 0:56:42
    Downstream
    8,128 Kbps
    Upstream
    448 Kbps
    ADSL settings
    VPI/VCI
    0/38
    Type
    PPPoA
    Modulation
    ITU-T G.992.1
    Latency type
    Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up)
    15.7 dB / 22.0 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up)
    15.0 dB / 8.5 dB
    Output power (Down/Up)
    19.8 dBm / 12.3 dBm
    Loss of Framing (Local)
    34
    Loss of Signal (Local)
    3
    Loss of Power (Local)
    0
    FEC Errors (Down/Up)
    13 / 0
    CRC Errors (Down/Up)
    0 / 2147480000
    HEC Errors (Down/Up)
    nil / 0
    Error Seconds (Local)
    3

  • X120e WiFi Connection Speed - is 802.11n speed possible?

    Dear guru!
    Could you please tell me what should I do in order to get 802.11n connection speed on my new x120e? The better speed I get is 65Mbs. On T500 I get 300Mbs with the same WiFi access point (so it definitelly depends on notebokk but not the infrastructure).
    Thanks in advance,
    Vadim

    Check if your router has a Channel Width selection. Mine was defaulted on 20mhz, which yielded crap performance, after changing to 40mhz it works as good as it can on this 1x1 card and connects at 150mbps to the router where before it was 72mbps.
    | X220 i7-2620M | 12.5" IPS | Intel 520 Series 180GB Main SSD | Mushkin 120GB mSATA SSD | 8GB RAM | Intel 6205 WiFi | BT | Win7 Pro 64 SP1 |

  • Connection Speed reading for external USB Modem ????

    In previous versions of the Mac OS, I've been able to see a readout of my connection speed achieved with a dial-up modem and telephone line (e.g. 28 kbps, 33 kbps, 50 kbps etc etc) but under this latest 10.5 Version of OS X I can't see this speed in the networking software that controls my Apple USB modem.
    Has this feature been dropped with 10.5 ?
    If not, how do I see the speed. It would be very helpful to see it as I sometimes travel to some pretty remote areas where phone lines are poor - so if you know the actual connect speed you have a good idea of what sort of size of downloads to attempt and not to attempt while on-line.
    I can see such parameters as my time connected and IP address assigned by the ISP, but no connect speed.

    I realize the speed that used to be shown was the initial speed the two modems involved, mine and the ISP's, negotiated to establish the connection and I also realize that is not the actual download speed.
    But it's still helpful to know that initial speed because it is a rough indicator of line quality ands gives one an idea of how rapidly he will be able to communicate - clearly there will be a significant difference for the better in performance for the online session if one can achieve a connect speed of, say 50k, as opposewd to 28k or less on a poorer line.

Maybe you are looking for

  • I can't opened a purchased book in iBook

    I can't open a purchased book in my iBook! Both on my iPad and iPhone. There's the iCloud icon and when I select it, it looks like it's going to open, but nothing! Help!

  • Create View Link Definitions - Problem

    Hi, I was trying to define a relationship between two view objects using the view link icon, but I always get this error messages: BME-99004:A java runtime exception has occurred, BME-02038:Exception thrown during validation. Can anyone help me? It's

  • HT2477 Working with fillable PDF docs

    I have a fillable pdf file that I am working on, but when I press tab to go the next question the Info. I entered disappears. Some of questions answered do are saved, but others no  - Tx.

  • SDK 4.0.0.5: CM.jar Is Not Copied BUG-cm_jars_structure.xml.example Missing

    Could someone please help me out. I am trying to fix this bug with: SDK 4.0.0.5: CM.jar Is Not Copied into the Package To Be Deployed [ID 1315169.1] And according to Oracle support I need to: Solution In SDK version 4.0.0, the cm.jar gets copied only

  • Video import from Camera Kit woks but from iphoto don't

    Dears, I have some cameras that whem I import to Ipad using the camera Kit it works perfectly. But if I import the video to iphoto and sync to ipad there's a error message that Ipad do not suport this format. Someone could explain how Apple could do