Posting in FI regarding rebates

Dear All,
I am a SAP SD consultant. I have created rebate agreement. After invoice, its not getting posted in FI. I have maintained all the nessary config in pricing... What settings are there for G/L account? If somebody has knowledge of rebates from FI point of view it wud be really helpful.
Thnx in advance.
Regards,
Pankaj

hi
check your config in pricing procedure
for your rebate condition type maintain req type as 24 aand also ERB and ERU
for the above accounting keys assign the g/l accounts in VKOA
http://www.erpgenie.com/publications/saptips/052005.pdf
Try to find the answers for your query by searching in the forum using the SEARCH option.
I am confident that you will be getting a lot of resources and answers and even more replies
which will already helped in solving the issue and also definitely they will give you broad understanding of the topic.
And also check the WIKI section of this forum there are valuable notes, configurations,etc.
check this link for wiki section.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/erplo/main
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/ERP+SD
regards
rithvika

Similar Messages

  • Posting date for CM rebates via Extended rebate processing

    Hi,
    we have the following scenarios for an extended rebate processing:
    1> rebate agreemetn validity period  = upto Sept 30 only
    2> Settlement Date = Oct 5
    3> CM posting date of the rebate is Sept 30
    How is it possible to make the CM posting date to the current date and not the valid to date?

    Hi Mark,
    I'm not sure, but I understand that you want to change the value of condition while you are running it. Check BADI SD_ENH_REBATES, method V13A_VERIFICATION, I see that you can change I_E_KONP. I am never use it, only I know it, so I don't tell you what kind of troubles you can find.
    I hope this helps you
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • Hi i am new to SCN. I want a help regards SAP-PM . Where to post any query regards SAP PM

    Hi i am new to SCN. I want a help regards SAP-PM . Where to post any query regards SAP PM

    Please check this link SAP Portfolio and Project Management (SAP RPM, cProjects) and cFolders
    Please check scn index to find relevant forum link.
    SCN Site Index

  • Regarding Rebate

    Hi Gurus,
        I am working on rebate and required information on following;
    How settlement of rebate is done. What is the procedure?
    How manual accruals works?
    What is the role of Settlement material in rebate settlement in customer rebate(B003 condition
               type)?
    How can I make immediate settlement the rebate to see the effect?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Hemu

    Hi,
    1.  at the end of the period or intermittently rebate settlement can be done as per requirement.
        go to VBO2, change the status open to released for settment, then click on execute settlement fof final settlement. and save it automatically cr memo req is saved, go to va02 remove billing block and save it,  go vf02 process cr memo.
    2. some time accruals are made manual depending on the business requirement.  for this settlement can be done as automatical accruals.
    3. settlement material role is used to reckon the product costing and profitability for those products come under rebates.  because any business want to know what is product cost and profitability.  after settlement the rebate discounts go to the respective material accounts and reduces profit and increases expenses on those products i.e. increases cost price indirectly.
    4. go to VBO2 and give agreement no which u want to settle and go inside change the status open to release and click on final settlement and process the step no.1 as above
    regards,
    sadanandam kasarla

  • Third Party Remittance Posting RUN : Information regarding particular BA Mi

    Hi Guys,
    While posting to FI for Third Party Remittance Posting RUN (standard sap Program RPURMPK0), when the selection for Business Area is left blank, the o/p gets Posted Properly for Business Area = ___(i.e. blank) and for all the other Business Area that is valid for the pay run.  But the Information that is displayed in the output is only  for Business Area = ___(i.e. blank).
    If the other applicable Business Area  ( = 01 suppose) is there in this pay, it gets posted properly, but the information is not displayed.
    Can u guys let me know how to get read of the diplay problem???
    Thanks in advance
    Jay Gandhi

    Hi Guys,
    This is the problem in the coding of SAP Program itself. I have copied it to Z Program and have made the changes, it works properly now.
    Have also notified SAP OSS .
    Jay Gandhi

  • 11gR2 Post-Upgrade Questions Regarding tnsnames, listener, pwd, and init

    Hello.
    Am planning on upgrading a significant # of RHEL5 10gR2 RAC and non-RAC DBs to 11gR2 (11.2.0.3.1, specifically). The servers are still not available to me, but I have been poring on the install and upgrade documents as well as referencing several blogs of users who have done them. I have almost literally read the guides verbatim. I will be using the DBUS - not doing a manual upgrade. Since I cannot test of the upgrade yet, I have a few questions related to POST_UPGRADE actions in terms of the listener, tnsnames, password, and init files.
    1.) The upgrade document indicates on p 3-24, "DBUA then proceeds to create new configuration files (parameter and listener files) in the new Oracle home." Will the init file (assuming spfile will be copied as we are using one everywhere now) have deprecated parameters REMOVED after it is copied over to the NEW/TARGET home?
    2.) While the install/upgrade guides do not call for it, several blogs indicate that the tnsnames and password files should be copied over from the old/source DB network/admin location ($TNSNAMES/admin) to the new/target DB /network/admin location. Do I need to do this or with the DBUA also copy them over? If all 4 files (tnsnames/listener/spfile/password) are copied over, I am not sure why the document doesn't indicate this.
    3.) Other than the spfile being copied over and modified, I don't see any difference between the old/source and new/destination copies of the listener, tnsnames, and password file. Do you agree?
    I am just trying to figure out what really need to be copied over and what doesn't in lieu of the DBUA doing it for me.
    Thank you all for your help. If I had HW to test this out, I would do it. In the meantime, I am writing the procedures to do the actual upgrade.
    Matt

    page 3-24 corresponds to following
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e23633/upgrade.htm#CHDDCBHG
    which states
    You must run the Oracle Net Configuration Assistant before running DBUA. See "Configuring the Listener When Upgrading from Oracle9i".
    If you are upgrading an existing Oracle Enterprise Manager Database Control or if you are configuring a new Oracle Enterprise Manager Database Control for the new Oracle Database 11g release, then the listener must be running before upgrading Oracle Enterprise Manager. If DBUA detects that an Oracle Enterprise Manager upgrade or configuration is requested, and DBUA does not see a listener running, then it prompts you and starts the default listener in either of these cases.
    running netca from new home results in creating a new listener.ora file, this could complain that listener is already used if the old listener is running with the same name or port (default 1521) taken.
    I think the "+DBUA reloads the listener.ora file in both the old and new Oracle Database environments.+" which point c in that list has to be taken in context with the two previous points a, b, where the usecase is shown how services , entries are removed from one listener.ora file and added to another. So to make sure those services are started from the "now" correct home those listener.ora are reloaded.
    If you look in the 11.1 upgrade guide this text is written as "DBUA removes the entry of the upgraded database from the old listener.ora file and reloads the listener of the old database." http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28300/upgrade.htm#i1011982
    If after the upgrade old oracle home is not used anymore (no database is running out of that) you can ignore the listener.ora on the old home.

  • Where to post Architecture question regarding Hyp Plan/Essbase installation

    *1st Installation (uses HypDB1 and Hypapp1 server) ----- PRODUCTION*
    Server HypDB1: <------ Server Hypapp1
    ESSBASE1 Hyp Plan1
    HYP Shared Service1 Studio1
    EAS1 Apache
    ODI Workspace1
    Oracle 11g
    *2nd Installation (uses HypDB2 and Hypapp2 server BUT Shares) ---- PROPOSED ADD ON TO PRODUCTION*
    BUT USES ORACLE11G of  1st Installation
    Server HypDB2: <------ Server Hypapp2
    ESSBASE2 Hyp Plan2
    HYP Shared Service2 Studio2
    EAS2 Apache
    ODI Workspace2
    Is the above possible?

    Another idea I found from this app note.
    http://www.xjtag.com/app-note-16.php
    But there is a note in this app note that speaks to the DONE signal.
    http://www.xjtag.com/app-note-14.php
    "When the programming operation of a Xilinx FPGA completes it will toggle its DONE signal; if this occurs when it is not expected then the PROM or processor that configures the FPGA can automatically re-start the process of programming the FPGA with its functional image (undoing the clearing that has just been done through XJTAG)."
    I couldn't find any info about this in the 7 Series Config User Guide. Does this apply to the 7 Series FPGAs?

  • Posting Settlement:Vendor Rebate Arrangment, Purchasing MEB4

    Hi Fellow Abappers,
        I got a requirement to change the Vendor line Item text @ FB03 with the condition type description of the agreement used upon posting of Settlement vendor rebate at TCODE MEB4...
       I found several exits LWBON001, LWBON003, LWBON004 and LWBON005.. but upon reading the tables and structures, I think nothing is relevant in changing the VENDOR LINE ITEM TEXT at FB03...
    Hope you can help me here guys... thank you..

    Hi; 
    Extra thanks for your answers, below the results of the checks and some information.
    Arrangement type :   
    - The Arrangement Types, Purchasing is 2000 (Standard) with this parameters.
    - The Settlement schema in the arrangement type is RM5000
    - Credit-Side side settlement -  Partial settlement : BM31
      - Credit-Side side settlement -  Final settlement   : BM11
    Accrued revenues for settled agreements. : 
    - No more posting : no checked 
    - Diff. account key to proc. RM5001 (Subs. Sett (tax trigger))
    In OBYC.
    - B01 : account 419800.
    - B02 : account 609000.
    In PO I use RM0000 schema.
    Thank you for your precious help, because I do not advance in the project because of this error, is why I am asking your help at all.
    Best regards

  • Regarding MM Posting Period

    At MIRO i am getting below error
    "Posting only possible in periods 2011/11 and 2011/10 in company code 3220"
    i am follwing a Fiscal Year from April to March, Hence current period is 11.
    i have checked OB52 Posting Period Varient. where in period 11 is open to all Account types.
    i have also checked MMRV..detaisl of MMRV below
    Current Period 11 2011
    Previous Period 10 2011
    Last Period in prev. year 12 2010
    Please suggest how shall i overcome this Error.
    Spandana
    FICO Consultant

    Hi,
    As you said & your system giving error message that to post in 10 or 11 period in year 2011.
    Also you  said your Fiscal Year from April to March & now hence current period is 11.
    You are very much right  about present period now 11. OK. What is current year now & how 2011 is opened?
    Now the current YEAR IS 2010 & period 11
    Now 1st check your Posting Period Variant for your company code " 3220" in t.code: OBY6
    Now check your REQUIRED PERIODS to post ( 10,11 for year 2010) is open in  Account Types A, K, D,M, S and specially Account Type u201C+u201D which stands for valid for all accounts type with Posting Period Variant. If not just open it.
    Now you need to reset the period (if your are practicing & testing) in OMSY t.code for setting periods for your company code " 3220" for material management.( This setting in OMSY is done once for all  )
    Now cross check in MMRV t.code for your  company code " 3220"  & You should have
    Current Period 11 2010
    Previous Period 10 2010
    Last Period in prev. year 12 2009
    Now try posting MIRO.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Rebate agreement was manuelly processed and Settled But Accruals are still

    Dear SDN Team,
    Can you please advice how to resolve the below issue as seems it was very critical.
    The problem is below:
    Rebate Agreement was created and it was settled manually completely.  Once it was settled it was created the Rebate Credit Note.  But Still the accrual is seen in Rebate agreement even the Final settlement is done with status "D".
    Looking for your advice in order to resolve this problem.
    The issue is critical - auditing is going on for years end closing
    Thanks and Regards,
    Jai

    Hi
    The accrual would not get posted back to the rebate once you create the final settlement request. The system makes the rebate non editable after this and changes the status to D (settled). The way out is as follows:
    1. Make credit memos item as zero and then post the credit memo for zero.
    2. Create a new rebate agreement with reference to the old one. Everything (conditions, recipient, validity, customers) would get copied.
    3. Once copied save it and run VBOF. The accruals would be re posted once again. (No manual accruals can be reposted though- only accrual through actual invoices).
    4. Settle the rebate for the correct amount.
    Regards
    Indranil

  • Rebate GL Entries

    Dear All,
    Required feedback from Gurus on the GL entries.
    Create a rebate agreement and when saving invoice system book the provision and post the following entry.
    Rebate Expense Dr. $100
    Rebate Payable Cr. $100
    When at the end of the month user wants to post the credit memo by partial settlement, lets assume that he is posting accural of $70. The following entry is generated at the time of the posting.
    Customer Cr. $70
    Rebate Payable Dr. $70
    Rebate Expense Dr. $70
    Rebate Expense Cr. $70
    Now If I want to run the final settlement I required that system only post the entry what left in the agreement.
    Customer Cr. $30
    Rebate Payable Dr. $30 but system cant post the required entry, and post the following entry that is not correct
    Customer Dr $ 70
    Rebate payable Cr $70
    Looking forward for the gurus response.
    Regards,

    Dear Vish.
    I have created a rebate agreement on qty basis, at the time of invoice system calculate the rebate in the invoicing condition, and along with normal entry also post the following entry.
    rebate expense Dr. $10
    rebate payable Cr. $10
    actual mechanism of the condition is coming like this,
    PR00             $100
    MWST 10%   $10
    Value including tax  $110
    Rebate base  $100
    BO03             $10 (this will generate the above mention entry of rebate expense and rebate payable)
    For above all my pricing procedure is ZXYZ
    Now i go to rebate agreemetn and see the accural value system show me the correct value $10 in the "Max Amount field" and in amount to be paid i input $6 and save the document, system automatically generate the credit memo request.
    In credit memo request i change the pricing procedure little bit becasue other wise it also call MWST will create problem while saving invoice so for that issue i made another pricing procedure and in that pricing procedure only input the BO03 condition type. line appear like this.
    BO03 requirement 24, AccK ERU, Accru ERU
    Till now every thing is ok, and when I post the credit memo, system generate the following entry that is OK.
    Customer Cr. $6
    Rebate Expense Dr. $6
    Rebate Expense Cr. $6
    Rebate Payable Dr. $6
    till nowevery entry is fine.
    now issue arise and required your expertise, if i am going to close the agreemetn or lets say run the final settlemt, i need that if there is any amount laying in the accural system only consider that and at the time of closing credit the customer by that value, in our case it is $4.
    But when i go to rebate agreemnt and after changing the status to B run the final settlemt, system only shows me the value that i have already booked through credit memo., my procedure is same.
    it automatically not credit the customer by remaining value although in the condition two lines are appeared with BO03 and second is same with BO03, in below line it show me the remaining value $4. a very strange behavior.
    Please suggest how in the condition system only consider the remaining value, did it required an other procedure.??
    or how.
    Pls feel free to ask if have any query.
    Looking forward for your response.
    Regards

  • COPA - SD - Rebates accrual & Credit memo

    We have rebates accrual posting from SD-
    Dr. Rebate A/c (PL) 1000 - this would also been in COPA
    Cr. Rebate accrual (BS) 1000
    Now you settle the rebate(credit memo) - say you decide to settle for 1200
    At this point the system will do the following entry (in FI):
    Dr. Rebate accrual (BS) 1000 - posted to COPA
    Cr. Rebate A/c (PL) 1000
    Dr. Rebate A/c (PL) 1200 - Posted to COPA
    Cr. Customer A/c 1200
    hence the difference of 200 will be posted to COPA.
    The issue is that I want to separate reverse of accrual and actual rebate in COPA i.e. to have two COPA line items
    first (accruals)    -1000
    second(rebate)    1200
    instead of current 200
    Is it possible?
    Thank you in advance.

    Hi
    I got your point... You are talking of the 2nd entry which is posted in COPA
    SInce it is having the same GL account repeating twice, I dont think you would have 2 line items relating to 2nd document... You will have only 1 line item
    What you would see in KE94 is the Original 1000 and the 200 amount so that you can have differentiation upto this level
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Settling of rebate agreement : Accrual not reversed

    Hi experts,
    I've quite a strange problem when i make a final settlement of a rebate agreement :
    The accrual are not reversed but are counted twice.
    I.e. I've an accrual of 100u20AC for a rebate agreement, when i settle it, it didn't go to 0 but to 200u20AC.
    When I make a partial settlement, the accrual is well reversed.
    The document types are the same for partial and final settlement.
    VKOA is correct and all FI document are posted correctly.
    Has someone an idea?
    Thanx
    Nicolas

    Hi nicholas
    If  answer has been given or your problem is solved ,kindly close the thread but if it is not solved dont close the thread , but if you have any new problem post it differently
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Cancel accrual of Rebate Agreement

    Hi
    My client has a requirement. He wants to cancel accruals for a rebate agreement because the accruals were done by mistake. He wants to cancel accruals and delete the rebate agreement.
    I read somewhere that it can be done by deleting the condition records in rebate agreement and then running VBOF. But I tried it in test system, and when I run VBOF it gave messages like "Document xyz is already assigned". Also when I go to "Verification level" and check the accruals are still showing for the Rebate Agreement.
    Can anyone share his experience how this can be handled?

    Hi nicholas
    If  answer has been given or your problem is solved ,kindly close the thread but if it is not solved dont close the thread , but if you have any new problem post it differently
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Rebate agreement scales

    Hi,
    We in our company has implemented rebate agreements. We have monthly offtake rebate as one of the rebate agreement type. The scales are as
    0-50 nil
    51-100                 Rs. 375/MT
    101-200                Rs.425/MT
    201-500                Rs. 500/MT
    > 500                     Rs. 600/MT
    Total billed qty for a month is 250 MT.
    Currently it is calculating as 250MT*Rs.500 = Rs. 125000 as the rebate amount.
    But the system should calculate as below
    first      50MT -    50MT*0 =  0
    second 50MT          50*375 =  18750
    for 100 MT         100*425 =42500
    last 50 MT            50*500 = 25000
    total rebate amount = Rs.86250
    I tried with scale type D - graduated to-interval but it is not accepting this scale type.
    Please help me to solve this problem.

    Hi,
    Scales are ignored when calculating accruals, but will be calculated at rebate settlement.
    You can check the manual on rebate set up and management that rithvika posted in another thread:
    Rebate Scales - Graduated to Interval scale
    Or OSS note 392711
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/392711
    best regards
    Michael

Maybe you are looking for