PR Release with respect to HR Org structure.

Hi ,
I am having a requirnment where Business needs to Approve PR's based on the HR org struct and $ limit .
Users maintained in HR org struct. have specifed roles ( eg. Managers , VP , Directors , CFO's) & based on the $ limit in PR's they become Approvers and then Approve the PR's.
The idea is that we dont want to create individual Roles specific to Release codes but more of general role(s) which can be assigned for the group based in Org struct. so that any new person comes into the specific Role in Org.struct can automatically Approve the PR and reduce the Basis work for creating roles and assiging every time a new user comes in .
Please let me know if there is any best practice solution availabe with any standard or custom developments by which this can be mapped.
Regards,
Lawrei

Hi,
Refer this post. It will give u a gist.
HR Mini Master for PR and PO Release Strategy
Regards,
Ram

Similar Messages

Difference between Scheduled and released with respect to process chains

HI All,
I am Creating a cube in whcih I want to upload the current status of the process chain.
And the requirement is not to take those process chains whcih are scheduled and not released( only take those process chains whcih have status released)
for the same I dont know what is the difference between Scheduled and Released in respect of process Chains and also from whcih Database table I can get this information.
Please help.
Regards,
Ujjwal

Hi,
Job Status Scheduled means a job has been created and is ready to run but has not yet been triggered.
A release status means the created job has been triggered and is waiting for the opportunity to run. A job can be in released status when it is a periodic Job ( Where once the job is completed it goes to release status), when it is slated for future execution, or when there is a delay due to database overload.
Regards,
Pramod

Blocking of Good Issue with respect to posting date

Hi Expert,
Is there any way out in SAP B1 to block the Good Release with respect to posting date.i.e. If User receipt the Good in stock today then system should not allow the user to issue the same good on the back date.
regards,
PankajK

Hi Pankaj,
There are so many options e.g you can check in oinm select that particular item sort on docdate and check inqty and compare with your goods issue date if it is same then send same transaction to approval if you want.
Thanks
Sachin

Options for Org Structure drill down.

Hi
We are working on an issue to allow Managers and Supervisors to generate reports based on their Org Structure. This is a BSP application that can be accessed over the SAP Enterprise Portal.
We currently have implemented the functionality to "Select Blocks" by implementing the HTMLB Table View Tag.
We have also added some javascripts to enable us to select blocks so that the users do not have to select each node and end node manually.
However, with this the entire org structure shows up exploded showing all nodes.
For some managers, this list is quite long and difficult to navigate through as it cannot be expanded / collapsed!
We would have preferred to implement the Tree and Tree Node HTMLB tags. However the SAP documentation for HTMLB tags (Tree and tree nodes) points that the Tree element is not intended for displaying tree structures with thousands of nodes and end nodes. Also the tree should never contain more than 30 - 50 entries! For CXO level reporting, this limit is very easily reached / surpassed.
We just wanted to reach out to the SDN community as we are sure this is a very common issue and there will be many developers who have solved this issue.
Any ideas / leads as to what are the best practices in designing an org structure with expandable/ collapsible as well as selectable nodes?
Thanks,
Development Team.

check out this weblog,
/people/durairaj.athavanraja/blog/2004/11/21/bsphow-to-build-performance-efficient-dynamic-htmlbtree
we can load children as the user expands the node (may be in the initial load of the tree just load two level and as user expands fill its children)
though sap documentation states that it cannot be user for large trees we have been using this for out cost center group hierarchy which is 8 level deep and has over 8000 nodes/leaves and we dont have any performance issues with that
Regards
Raja

Display of Person with position in Org Structure

Dear All,
We have a display issue, please help us to resolve.
While uploading the master data with help of BDC, the data is uploaded which has been checked properly showing data has been uploaded. But when we see the org structure through ppom_old we cant see person assignment to the positions.
chandan maity

Hi,
Whenever you run master data upload through BDC the relationships in OM are not created.
I am sure you have created the necessary positions in OM under Org Units and then used these positions in BDC to upload your IT 0001. But now you are not able to see the position - holder assignment in OM, right?
If this is your problem then go to SE38 and run program RHINTE00.
Select one or two persons for whom you have uploaded master data and run the above program for them
If you have already created OM objects then tick mark CREATE HOLDER RELATIONSHIPS ONLY
a session will be created with your username which you can process through SM35
please go through the documentation of the report to understand the use.
cheers
Ajay

Agent Determination with Org Structure without HR

We are currently on SAP 4.7 without the HR component. Our tech area would really like us to implement our first workflow where agent assignment is determined from an org plan. This workflow is a very simple workflow and actually only involves 2 people (one clerk and one manager).
If I build a very simple structure for this particular department, how easy is it to add on additional levels, both higher or lower, at a later date that will accomodate future workflows without effecting the existing one?
Thoughts?

Thank you Ramki and Sivarajendren,
I guess I'm still struggling with the best way to determine agent assignment given our circumstances (no HR) and the simplicity of this workflow. (Recap of workflow - investigation and approval of corp refunds done by person # 1. If refund > $500, needs approval from person #2).
The tech area wants me to create a simple org plan but not assign any users to it and then transport it all clients. Then in each client, we can assign users which would accomodate our testing with different id's than in prod. The workflow would then assign to a position not a userid. The advantage is that when people leave, the org plan must be maintained not the workflow.
I've thought about using responsibility rules but ultimately, you are assigning a userid to a rule which still needs maintenance if a user leaves.
I've also thought about using activity groups but the way we use them at our location isn't appropriate in this circumstance. Our activity groups are so broad it would give too many people access to workflows.
Lastly, I've thought about creating a custom Z table with the userid's in it and calling a function module to determine agent assignment. This actually sounds intriguing but again, someone would need to maintain the userid's in the table. Also, what's the best kind of key for the table - taskid?
One of our dilema's is that IT management does not want to give anyone authorization to change a WF templete in prod. So I must create the WF templete with the correct assignment in our dev system and then transport it to our prod system.
Then there's the whole issue about who will be doing any maintenance. Since we don't have an HR component at this time (hopefully sometime in the next 5 years), HR won't maintain an org structure.
See how complicated this is becoming? I'd appreciate any insight.
Joanne

Working with HR replication after using local org. structure

Hello SRM Gurus,
My client have implemented the HR module in ECC 5 and want to use it for replicating it to SRM 4.0.
We're in PROD (using the extended classic scenario) for over a year using a local SRM org. structure.
Have any one encountered with this requirement?
What will be the system impact of this kind of change, in terms of old documents, in process documents etc..?
Please your advise.
Raz

Hi Raz,
The workaround resolution ( not a fix ! ) I have created for a client (but not executed as client agreed to communicate to the users (manually created)....no history etc from go-live date etc.
Step 1) User A ( Manually created in SRM ORG)
Step 2) User A1 ( created through HR ORG - 0105/0001 )
Step 3) Set on behalf for A1 (means A1 always purchase and see the SC etc on behalf of A) .
Step 4) Set the timeframe for the on behalf feature (i.e say 3 months from go-live User A will be deleted and no on behalf etc). FYI, history information still exist in database, you may write your own custom code to retrieve it for audit purpose
Make sure User A is deleted from SRM ( I mean SAP User ID ..not just ORG).
Step 5) Change the HR 0105/0001 entry and set the user to User A.
Step 6) You will see the change pointer for it
Step 7) User A is back to business.....
This is the backup plan I have created it. But I have not executed it.....may be when I get time, I will test it....If you /someone happen to test it, please let me know the result.
Hope it will help you.
-Pranav

Problems with HR org structure replication

Hello,
EBP 5.0, HR 4.7
we have a big issue where at the moment replication between HR and SRM is not working properly.
We made customizing according to 550055 note and found out that BAdI BBP_OM_BUPA_ALE (note 850328) is active. This prevents to have concurrent employment in SRM org structure.
We can replicate O (units) and S (positions) form HR without problem. But when we try to replicate P (persons) with infotype 0105 filled (users in SRM) afterwards we do not see positions for which users have to be created!!!
IDOCs have information that everything went OK.
Please help!
Gordan

Issue is resolved by SAP, some customizing entries are missed from ECC side

Interface with Peoplesoft for Org structure

Please let me know if there is way to interface with Peoplesoft to get the org chart (employees and their reporting details along with Org structure) and update the SAP Org hierarchy (PPOME). Any type of interfacing (file, RFCs, real time) options available to achieve this? We have our HR in PeopleSoft but need the Org chart in SAP for workflow and other reasons.
If any one has done anything similar, please share how it was done. Thank you.

No one seems to know of a way, so closing it.

Resource search with "wrong" Org Structure

Hello,
I am using cProjects 4.5.
My org structure is coming from SAP HCM (IDOC HRMD_ABA)
Now i am creating a project with resource-role.
When i want to staff that role with resources i'll use the "resource source" button.
I can search by organisational structure, but here i'll see a part of the structure....not the whole structure i see when i use PPOME.
The dates are right. Which influence this search bij organisational unit?

Solved the problem:
OSS NOTE 960556

New ECC system with new org structure into existing CRM 7 system

Hi,
We have a situation where we have a current ECC 6 system which distributes organisation structure to a CRM 7 system using ALE (org units, positions, personnel numbers).
We are implementing a new ECC 6 instance as a result of a merger which will have a new org structure, the CRM 7 system remains.
My question is has anyone dealt with a similar situation where a new org structure is distributed into an existing CRM or SRM system? Any lessons you could share? Or tips for how to approach this?
Thanks
Marc

You need to schedule program RHALENI in Insert mode to achieve the same
Thanks,
Sundeep

HR Org.Structure Integration with SRM

Experts,
I am working on a SRM 6.0 implementation. My client already have SAP HR setup.
Would you recommend to use the HR Org.Structure integration or to maintain a separate SRM Structure? If you have any experience with HR integration I would really appreciate a brief pros and cons.
Thanks in advance,
Mark

Hello all.
This is very old post but I need related info for HR integration with SRM.
I am an HR guy and our SRM team wants us to suggest an attribute they could tie to Spending limit on purchase order but have not came up with any.
Any of you have done this before? Normally - how does spending limit tied to person for purchase order?
They also wants the cost directed for Cost center and its a FI object not HR and we don't maintain owership relationship on this, Any idea's if how we can achieve this?
All responses and/or some documents are greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Jay

Rule 168 to work with org structure and not relationships

Hi,
I would like to use rule 168 to work with the organizartional structure and not the relationships maintained in PO10 organizational unit.
this is because i want the agent to be the person with the red hat and not the a002 relationship maintained in organizational unit. i tried using rule 157 but it does the same thing and determines agent based on relationships maintained in org unit.
basically i dont want the agent to be any of the line mangers which may have been set up, i want it to be the red hat of the org structure
does anyone know how i can do this, or will i need to delete the relationships between staffing?
Thanks
Forhad

Here is a code example to read from the tables in base to the personnel number emulating the SWE_GET_MANAGER function, I hope this helps. Regards.
Z GET MANAGER *******************
***Gets the position for the creator of the requisition
clear V_OBJID.
select single objid into V_OBJID from HRP1001
   where otype = 'S'        and
          plvar = '01'       and
          rsign = 'A'        and
          relat = '008'      and
          begda <= sy-datum and
          endda >= sy-datum and
          infty = '1001'     and
          sclas = 'US'       and
          sobid = pt_cont-VALUE+2.
if sy-subrc = 0.
   valid if the user has personnel number don't proceed to look for the chief
     clear V_OBJID2.
    select single objid into V_OBJID2 from HRP1001
     where otype = 'S'        and
           objid = V_OBJID    and
           plvar = '01'       and
           rsign = 'A'        and
           relat = '008'      and
           begda <= sy-datum and
           endda >= sy-datum and
           infty = '1001'     and
           sclas = 'P'.
    if sy-subrc <> 0.
   if the user exist in the correspondant date gets the chief position
      clear V_POS_SOBID_CH.
      select single sobid into V_POS_SOBID_CH from HRP1001
       where otype = 'S'        and
             objid = V_OBJID    and
             plvar = '01'       and
             rsign = 'A'        and
             relat = '002'      and
             begda <= sy-datum and
             endda >= sy-datum and
             infty = '1001'     and
             sclas = 'S'.
      if sy-subrc = 0.
      if the relationship with a chief position exist gets the chief user id
        clear V_US_SOBID_CH.
        select single sobid into V_US_SOBID_CH from HRP1001
         where otype = 'S'            and
               objid = V_POS_SOBID_CH and
               plvar = '01'           and
               rsign = 'A'            and
               relat = '008'          and
               begda <= sy-datum      and
               endda >= sy-datum      and
               infty = '1001'         and
               sclas = 'US'.
        IF sy-subrc = 0.
          clear pt_actor.
          refresh pt_actor.
          pt_actor-otype = 'US'.
          pt_actor-objid = V_US_SOBID_CH.
          append pt_actor.
        endif.
      endif.
    endif.
endif.
***************End of Z GET MANAGER.*****************************

CATS - Manager need to approve users reporting to him with out ORG Structur

Hi Gurus,
At our client, they did not have any Org Structure. They do not want to implement any Org struture.
They are implenting CATS (ESS). Users enter the Time sheets. Manager will approve the team members who report to him?
Is there any way how managers get ONLY see users reporting to him with out a ORG Structure?
I think we can do this restriction with Personnel Area and Personel Sub Areas but we need built separate role for each manager?
Please let me know if i am wrong.
Thanks,
Kshriram
Edited by: Kshriram on Aug 12, 2009 5:08 AM

Hi Srinivas,
I'm not sure about MSS. But you can integrate CATS with Project system and achieve this.
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/CATS/CATS.pdf
You can get CATS and PS materials
http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/html/J12_EN_DE.htm
http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/BBLibrary_Start.htm
Hope this helps
Regards,
Brinda L

Goods receipt when PO creator has been removed from org structure ?

Hello in my organisational structure PPOMA_BBP, i have 2 users, X and Y.
X has created a PO in the SRM portal.However , X has been removed from the org. structure.
Is it possible for Y to make the goods recept( that is , Y logs in the portal and makes the goods receipt) ?

Hi
Did you try to delete the user ? Did you get any error message?
Note 1148837 - SRM user cannot be deleted
When trying to delete an SRM user the system will check if there are still
related SRM documents in the system. If there are active documents in the
system the deletion is not possible. This is the correct system behaviour.
But even if all related SRM documents are archived the deletion is
sometimes not possible, because there are residual entries in table
CRMD_PARTNER linked to this user.
More Terms
User crmd_partner residual entries deletion active document
Cause and Prerequisites
Solution
The attached report PARTNER_SET_DELETE will display in simulation mode all
residual entries in table crmd_partner with invalid item or header links
and in non simulation mode it will delete the corresponding crmd_partner
entries.
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 10.03.2008 11:54:37
Priority: Correction with low priority
Category: Help for error analysis
Main Component SRM-EBP-PD Procurement Document Methods
Additional Components:
SRM-EBP-ADM-USR SRM User Administration
Valid Releases
Software Component Release From
Release
To Release and Following
SRM_SERVER 500 500 500
SRM_SERVER 550 550 550
Support Packages
Support Packages Release Package Name
SRM_SERVER 500 SAPKIBKS14
SRM_SERVER 550 SAPKIBKT12
Correction Instructions
Ref note 550071 too..
regards
Muthu

PR Release with respect to HR Org structure.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for