Premiere Pro's #1 missing feature

Question

I just sent the following FR to Adobe.  I believe it's the single biggest thing missing in PP.  If you agree that this would help your workflow, please support these ideas by reposting them in your own FRs here: http://www.adobe.com/go/wish.
Any tweaks you would suggest for an event better workflow?  Please share!
Cheers
FCPX and FCP7-style subclip creation
How would you like the feature to work?
FCPX-style subclips:
1. Ability to assign keyboard shortcuts to Bins (e.g. numbers 0-9 on keypad).
2. While playing a clip in the Source Monitor, hitting one or more of these shortcuts would automatically send the whole clip or its marked in/out range to the linked Bin(s), without interrupting playback.
3. For easy reference, Bins with a shortcut could display the shortcut in the Bin's name.  For example, a Bin named 'Interviews' would automatically appear as 'Interviews {1}' if associated with that shortcut.
FCP7-style subclips:
1. Ability to drag/drop trimmed clips from the Timeline back into one or more Bin, together with any associated effects and keyframes.
IMPORTANT NOTE: In order to be useful, these subclips would have to maintain flexible in/out points (i.e. ability to trim in/out points out to the clip's original duration)
Why is this feature important to you?
Being able to organize/search for partial clips in the Project window is much better than doing so in the Timeline since Bins are: keyword searchable, sortable, and viewable in 2 modes (Icon or List view). But most of all, easy subclip creation would help keep the Timeline free of all non immediately-relevant media, since any clips for later use could be stored in Bins instead of in the Timeline.
The lack of any easy, flexible and intelligent subclip creation/organization in PP remains it's biggest shortcoming, IMO.  PP's current method of creating subclips - that can't be created on the fly from the Source Monitor, can't contain imbedded effects/keyframes, and can't have flexible in/out points - is of little real world use.
Adding FCPX and FCP7-style subclip creation/organization in Premiere Pro would make editing easier for most, if not all, editors: including documentary filmmakers with lots of footage to sort, music video editors who want to store B-roll clips for later use, FCP editors migrating to PP, and on and on!

Answer 1

Biggles, you've just proven my point by saying that you haven't used subclips in the last 15 years of using Premiere.  Thank you!  I haven't either.  That's as good an indication as any that subclips in PP are worthless due to their hard in/out points, as mentioned several times before.
As I said, sometimes you don't know what you're missing until you see or get it.  I didn't know the organizational tools I've been missing out on myself until I tried FCPX.  But as I made rather clear, FCPX's genius organizational abilities are where that program's genius ends, IMO.  So FCPX is a no go, despite it's brilliant keywording features.
I'm sorry you and certain others on these forums see my honest effort to see PP improve as a 'rubbishing' of Premiere and it's users.  I choose the path of offering FRs, and thoughtful, relevant discussion rather than unwarranted attacks/assumptions (e.g. your assumption that since you personally have never used subclips in 15 years, Adobe's resources would be better spent elsewhere than improving this feature that never worked properly).  Where some see opportunity, as I do in some amazing tricks FCPX has shown us are possible, others see problems (added programming work for Adobe, etc).
Having seen several users jumping the gun with  accusations and  assumptions, I'm beginning to question if users on these forums are more interested in seeing Premiere Pro improve, or defending Adobe and themselves against the truth that there's still a ton of room for improvement.
When those who dedicate lots of time to offering well elaborated FRs are told by a forum member 'just leave', you've got to wonder what's their motivation.  As Cypher in The Matrix says, "Ignorance is bliss".  You can't feel the lack of what you don't know exists, so I can understand a certain resistance to new ideas, however better they may be to the old paradigm.  Resistance to change and improvement is a historic fact: it happened with cars (i.e. resistance to 'horseless carriages'), and sadly it happens in every industry, to this very day... including Adobe software.