Prepayment Relevance LFB1-PREPAY_RELEVANT

Hi,
do you know logic of field Prepayment Relevance (Vendor Master) in invoice verification?
Thank you
Daniela

Hi Gianni
I could not find any field prepayment relevant in the vendor master.
Where from you get this field?
Thanks
Ashok
Assign points for useful answer

Similar Messages

  • Prepayment Vendor

    Hello,
    Can someone please explain how to use the prepayment functionality in ECC 6.0
    How can I create an example and what I need to do in customizing.
    Kind Regards

    Hi,
    Prepayment of invoices
    This functionality is characterized as follows:
    u2022 User can trigger prepayment of vendor invoices in logistics invoice verification.
    u2022 User use the prepayment function for vendors with whom organisation has a good, long-standing relationship.
    u2022 The function enables payment soon after issue of the invoice and full exploitation of the date of required payment and existing cash discounts, by posting the vendor liabilities, taxes, and cash discounts in financial accounting in advance.
    u2022 The software executes the payment of the invoice regardless of the relevant goods receipt and the outcome of the invoice verification check.
    u2022 Most logistics invoice verification standard functions are not affected by the prepayment function.
    u2022 When the software posts invoices, it continues to execute the standard checks.
    u2022 If the software has already posted the prepayment document, user can make only restricted changes to the header fields of the invoice.
    u2022 To ensure adequate and orderly financial accounting postings, a prepayment clearing account has been added to SAP ERP Central Component.
    u2022 Upon prepayment, the software debits this account and then settles the account again after executing the check.
    Refer following links also;
    [Entering Invoices for Prepayment|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/a8/b99f58452b11d189430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]

  • Shipment Type and Route cost relevance on Shipment

    A route is created and the stage is marked as cost relevant. The route may be used for prepay or collect inco terms.
    The shipment type defined as collect is not cost relevant.
    A shipment is created and the shipment cost is not cost relevant based on shipment type, but the overall status is "Not Processed" when it is created because of the route stage. The desired status is 'Not Relevant".
    What is the correct way to handle this?
    Is it necessary to create two routes for same stage: one for prepay and one for collect?

    A route should be created to support the different shipment type

  • Problem in creation of order relevant - intercompany invoice

    Dear all ,
    I am facing problem in creation of intercompany invoice which is sales order relevant . Please tell which settings is required to resolve this as all the settings has been made.
    Send ur email id so that the problem can be described if required....
    Thanks .........

    Hi,
    while creating inter company sales order give the delivering plant in the overview screen. so that enables the system and tells that that is inter company sales order . u can verify whether the system takes which sales order whether it is standard order or inter company? by going to the conditions in the item overview in that u can find the "pi01" or "pi02" and select the delivery details there u can find the delivering plant which is supplying plant and the shipping point of the supplying plant..
    in case of doubt u can mail me at [email protected]
    Reward if Helpful..
    Regards,
    Praveen Kumar.D

  • Third party process:Billing relevance 'B' order related and 122

    I am facing the following problem: in Order related Billing according to order qty, the sales order bills what has been received on the third party PO in MM.
    The following situation occurs: When I order 100, receive 100 and Bill 100: The sales order is fully billed. When I later return a quantity to the vendor in MM with a 122 referring to the PO, the sales order remains fully billed. There is no way I can find out which Sales order needs to be take action on (credit). Can someone help me finding out how I can select these sales orers after a 122?

    Ok, no problem.
    At the client we have a very specific flow where receipts on a third party PO need to be billed daily when they happen and every receipt (better: any goods movement) needs a seperate billing document.
    This is not covered in SAP standard. I wrote a program (functional) how SAP should find the billing relevant movements:
    1) Go to the billing due list daily at 0:00
    2) Check all related third party PO's and the movements
    3) Check the sales flow of the relevant SO. Check which material doc has been billed (via reference field in the billing doc)
    4) For all items not yet billed call function module GN_INVOICE_CREATE. (bill in case of 101 and 123 and credit in case of 102 and 122)
    This works all fine until I found above issue: Fully billed items are removed from the billing due list even if there is a 122 or 102 afterwards on the PO. So I redesigned the program.
    1) at 0:00 Select all movements on the system date for the specific flow (PO type and plant) via Material documet header and segment.
    2) Via the account assignment in the material doc you have the Sales order. Then the same applies:
    3) Check the sales flow of the relevant SO. Check which material doc has been billed (via reference field in the billing doc)
    4) For all items not yet billed call function module GN_INVOICE_CREATE. (bill in case of 101 and 123 and credit in case of 102 and 122)
    Here I am not using the due list and it solved my problem.

  • Implement Hierarchy's On InfoObject that is Not Auth Relevant.

    Hello Friends,
    Please Advice me in this issue.
    I am Upgrading from 3.1 to 7.0.I am able to implement hierarchies when the Infoobject is auth relevant.
    There are hierarchies in 3.1 on Infoobjects which are Not Auth Relevant.
    Like 0PLANT ..I don't know how to implement using this.
    Is there any way to implement hierarchies on InfoObjects which are not auth relevant in BI 7.0 using Analysis authorizations.
    Or Do i need to make thes non auth relevant InfoObjects of 3.1 to auth relevant in 7.0 and implement hierarchies.
    Please advice.
    Thanks,
    Ram

    Hi Keerti,
    Can you please tell me how to implement hierarchy with out making 0PLANT auth relevant.
    We are upgrading from 3.1 to 7.0.
    0PLANT is not auth relevant in 3.1 but it has Hierarchies.
    So business team wants to have the same in 7.0 with out making it auth relevant.
    Please help me in doing this.
    Thanks
    Ram

  • To get the invoice number of amount applied in view prepayment applications

    hi all
    In AP abc Manager-Invoices--when we give invoice number in the invoice number field we get to see supplier name etc in the same Invoices Form there is a
    tab called General from which we can get Amount Paid ,
    Similarly there is a tab called View Prepayment Applications ,when clicked on this tab we can see Amount Applied and invoice number corresponding to that amount applied
    KIndly help me from which table or view this invoice number can be obtained
    i got amount applied from the view AP_UNAPPLY_PREPAYS_V,but i cant find the invoice number.
    kindly guide
    thanking in advance
    Edited by: makdutakdu on Dec 19, 2011 11:29 AM

    Thanks Robin,
    i was able to get a work around for this. For the time being i am using the following code snippet, i will try using the one u sent an will see if this works too.
    // create nodeinfo object for the node that table will bind to
    final IWDNodeInfo nodeinfo = wdThis.wdGetContext().node<NODENAME>().getNodeInfo() ;
    //get the structure of the node
    final IStructure struct = nodeinfo.getStructureType() ;
    Iterator iter = nodeinfo.iterateAttributes() ;
    if (null != struct)
    totalFields = struct.getNumberOfFields();
    else
    for ( Iterator i = nodeinfo.iterateAttributes(); i.hasNext(); i.next() )
              totalFields++;
    for(count = 1; count <= totalFields; count++)
         fieldName = nodeinfo.getStructureType().getField(count).getName();

  • Line item not relevant for payment release

    Dear Expert,
    When I select payment block : 'Payment Request' in FB60. Error Message appear "Line item not relevant for payment release".
    I also have set payment block in master vendor and  OBB8.
    Can you tell me why the error message still appear?
    Kindly need your help
    Thanks and Regards,
    YL

    Do you have any workflow variant in place?
    Moreover, when you have already set the Payment block at Master level, you need not to fix it in transaction level.
    Vendor itself will not get paid until unless you remove the block option
    Thanks

  • Hello  I don't know who to complain to as you do not appear to have a complaints department, despite searching the web, I trust you can pass this to relevant department for action, as I'm very angry over my recent repair.  Following my issue relating to a

    Hello
    I don't know who to complain to as you do not appear to have a complaints department, despite searching the web, I trust you can pass this to relevant department for action, as I'm very angry over my recent repair.
    Following my issue relating to a blank screen 2 weeks ago, your advisor arranged for my iMac to collected by Amsys, for repair and return, this was done and it was returned to me last Tuesday, onWednesday I set up my iMac again and instantly realised I had problems, much worse than before. I called Amsys to inform them of the issue of the computer being very very slow and unable to open iPhoto and pages, and document listing would not show up, plus I had no sound on the mac.They informed me that they had only replaced the video card and what they had done would have not affected the computers performance. He suggested I reinstall OSX again which I did, but this made no difference to the programs, so I called you.
    Your technician on the phone was very good as they have always been, and made an appointment for me to go into the Milton Keynes Apple store the next day at 1 pm, which I did.
    The gentleman on the Genius Bar was very good and was able to run tests on the iMac in my presence, and diagnosed immediately an issue with the sound problem, and advised me that this could not be fixed while I wait and I would need to leave it for repair. I made him aware of the previous repair, and he was able to see via your system, the list of logged issues I have had with this since purchasing in September 2012. I'm sure you can see from the way you record all calls and issues the problems I have had.
    Today I called to ask if my iMac would soon be ready for collection, I was told the repairs had been completed and it was being tested. However to my dismay, I learned of another serious issue relating to the repair carried out by Amsys. I was informed that 6 screws were missing from the the iMac internally, which caused me much distress and concern, they also told me I had to wait even longer as the screws had to be ordered and installed on arrival before I could collect it.
    My issues here are: I trusted the Amsys repairer as it was arranged and recommend by you, it is very evident they are not competent to repair, as they have caused more problems with my iMac on its return, despite enclosing a checklist, fully ticked showing everything working well, it clearly wasn't ! Plus the issue of missing parts (screws) during the repair, I have already expressed my disgust with Amsys, by email and had a response, within the hour, apologising and told me they were looking into this.
    This where I stand on this, I have not had my iMac for  almost two weeks and I do not know when I will get it back. I'm also very worried about what other damage has been caused by Amsys and the quality of my iMac now. I want to know what you, Apple is going to do about this ? I have already been very inconvenienced by this and until now I have been a very loyal apple customer with 2 iPads, and 4 iPhones in our household, not to mention the iMac.
    I feel I have been very let down by this experience, on my iMac, which cost a lot of money, I have also lost a lot of money with lost work and unable to carry out my business without it, and I will be seeking compensation.
    I trust you will take this complaint seriously and pass it to the relevant department for action.
    Yours sincerely
    Des Withey 
    Sent from my iPad
    On 26 Feb 2014, at 11:44, Apple Support <[email protected]> wrote:
    Thanks for contacting us.
    Thanks for contacting Apple Support. If you need more help later, you can open the case below or start a new support request online.
    Case ID:
    Open this case
    Sincerely,
    Apple Support
    Get help online
    Visit Apple Support to learn more about your product, download software updates, and much more.
    Join the conversation
    Find and share solutions with Apple users around the world.
    TM and copyright © 2014 Apple Inc. 1 Infinite Loop, MS 96-DM, Cupertino, CA 95014.
    All Rights Reserved / Privacy Policy / Apple Support / Give us feedback
    On behalf of Apple Distribution International

    Call Apple Customer Relations - 1-800-275-2273.  Ask politely & firmly that you want to be transferred to Customer Relations.  Tell them exactly what you stated in your post.
    GOOD LUCK!
    These are user-to-user forums where everyday folk (volunteers) post questions and offer answers (technical support) to each other.  

  • I had to change my Apple ID and password in itunes. Now my icloud doesn't work and I can't update my apps on my iPhone. I have looked at suggestions on the community pages and apple suggestions but none of them are relevant to iOS 8.1.2  icloud just

    I had to change my Apple ID and password in itunes. Now my icloud doesn't work and I can't update my apps on my iPhone. I have looked at suggestions on the community pages and apple suggestions but none of them are relevant to iOS 8.1.2
    icloud just keeps bringing up my old email address & asking for my old password which doesn't exist anymore and when I try to sign out of icloud it wants my old password, when I tried to change my primary email back to the old one it wants me to verify it through an email address that doesn't exist. Please can you help me sort out this nightmare.

    Hi skippy2012trev,
    Welcome to the Apple Support Communities!
    I understand that you updated your Apple Id and password but now you are being prompted for the old information in iCloud. You are on the right track by changing the Apple ID back to the previous email address temporarily so that you can sign out. You should not need to verify the email address. After you edit the Apple ID back to the old email address and then sign out of iCloud on your iPhone, edit the Apple ID back to the address you would currently like to use. There is no need to change the password again, only the email address, unless you prefer to update the password again.
    If you're asked for the password to your previous Apple ID when signing out of iCloud - Apple Support
    Change your Apple ID temporarily
    If signing out and back in to iMessage or FaceTime didn't help, try these steps:
    Change your Apple ID to the Apple ID you used previously. You shouldn't need to verify the email address.
    Tap Settings > iCloud. Complete these steps only if the Find My [Device] setting is turned on:
    Scroll down and tap Sign Out, then tap Sign Out to confirm. If you're using iOS 7 or earlier, tap Delete Account, then tap Delete to confirm.
    Tap Keep on My [Device] or Delete from My [Device]. In either case, your data remains in iCloud and will be updated on your device when you sign in to iCloud again.
    Enter the password for your previous Apple ID.
    Change your Apple ID to the new email address that you want to use. You'll need to verify the email address.
    Return to Settings > iCloud and sign in with your new Apple ID.
    Cheers,
    Joe

  • Table Name to take report of Open Sales Order items&its relevant GL Number.

    Hi,
    I wanted to take a report with Output as Open Sales Order Items and its relevant GL account numbers. is there any T Code in the Standard or atleast the table name.
    I have already fetched the Open Sales Order Items from T code VA05, but i need the relevant GL account numbers also.
    Any pointers on this will be appreciable.
    Rgds,

    Hi
    There are no standard reports where in you can fetch the data of the open sales order items and its G/L accounts with the output. But  by creating your own report using LIS then it is possible
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Update Vendor Reconciliation Account - LFB1-AKONT

    To Update LFB1-AKONT, on Create or change of Vendor based on some criteria , I have tried using the BADI
    SAPMF02K ( Used only for Checking data)
    and the BTE 00001421     VENDOR MASTER DATA: Save with data transfer Also does not work.
    Have set the values inside and the update indicator, still not working. Am I missing somethign?
    Please suggest a solution.
    Thanks,
    Vinotha M

    Check badi VENDOR_ADD_DATA
    method PRESET_VALUES_CCODE

  • Relevancy of a field in Plant Classification in OGSD

    Hi all,
    I would like to know the relevancy of the field "No inventory guidance in the SA (/ICO/MOC_WK-BSTID)" Keine Bestandführung im SA in German in the configuration node IS Oil and Gas Downstream --> OGSD -->General Settings --> Plant Classification.
    Thanks for the answer,
    PKM

    Hi PKM,
    the flag means that a goods receipt will take place into a plant whereas the stock appears from nowhere.
    Regards,
    Fouad

  • How to import the 'PREPAYMENT' type invoices in R11i

    Hi,
    We are on 11.5.10.2, Patch Set Level AP.O
    I am looking for an automated solution to import the AP Invoices of type 'PREPAYMENT'. The process throws up an error saying that the invoice type is not valid, even though 'PREPAYMENT' is in the Invoice Type Lookup.
    Couple of solution pointers were advising to build a customization, by taking the code of AP INVOICE IMPORT and other related programs, but the effort to develop and maintain the customization is not worth the business need, as there will be only 20 - 30 Prepayments every month and business users can create them manually. Thus we would like to explore the option using the standard interface to import prepayments in 11i.
    According to the following note, it is not possible to import prepayment invoices in 11i:
    Note 430493.1 - Unable To Import Prepayment Type Invoices.
    But if we are importing a standard invoice and if we have available prepayment to that supplier, then we will be able to apply it in import process (
    Note 1280716.1 - How To Apply a Prepayment to an Invoice During Payables Open Interface Import)
    Note that the feature has been implemented in R12 (see Note 460572.1)
    Thanks,
    Jayaram.

    Hi
    I have had the same issue in the past and resolved it using a customisation.
    It is a tiny customisation, in the standard program, the invoice types for standard invoice and credit memo are hardcoded. All you need to do is add 'PREPAYMENT' to this list and the custom version will work (assuming you take a copy of the standard as your starting point)
    Regards

  • Need interface tables in payables for  invoices of type prepayment

    hi all i am doing conversion in payables for invoices of type prepayments
    the table which i am using are
    AP_INVOICES_INTERFACE
    AP_INVOICE_LINES_INTERFACE
    can any one help me by giving correct interface tables

    Hi,
    As far as I know, you can't import prepayments through AP Open Interface: it only supports importing invoice types 'STANDARD' and 'CREDIT'. One alternative would be importing them as standard invoices and, after loading them into AP, change invoice_type_lookup_code to PREPAYMENT.
    Hope it helps,
    Ketter Ohnes

Maybe you are looking for