Problem in BW development system.

Hi Experts,
I have problem with BW development system, some of the loads are failed freuently in the BW development and test clients, but they never fail in the production client.
and the error message I am able to see in the Header tab is
"IDocs were found in the ALE inbox for Source System that are not updated.
Processing is overdue."
So I am resolving the issue by " updating manually in OLTP system"
So can any one help me out what will be the problem and how it will be prevented permanently.
regards
sekhar

Hi,
In the system, the Basis team will setup a number of processors for certain specific jobs (you can view them via SM51), and they're ENQUEUE (1), DIALOG (about 6-7), BACKGROUND (3?), SPOOL (2). Each of them serve specific usage. Now when a BI* job comes into the system, it tries to run the job through the Background processors, and also locking up certain tables using the Enqueue. However, if at the point of running the job, there's already someone locking up the table or taking up all the background processors, this BI* job will have to wait until the lock is released or that the background processors are freed up. Hence this could lead to time out on the BI* jobs. It is very common for DEV to be setup with minimal number of processors for each, since the usage is pretty much restricted to the Development team alone.
As for the number of dialog processors, I recalled that there's an OSS note advising on the number of processors to be setup in the environment as a basic setup.
Of course it is also wise to check on the BD87 and the dumps - ST22 and SM21 transactions to find out more information on the reasons of termination.
Thus, frequent termination of jobs is usually related to hardware constraint, or genuinely some configuration setting in the IDOC setup.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Gimmo

Similar Messages

URJECT - License (Restart Problem in the development system)......

Hi All,
After successfully installing Licence in ECC6, then getting following error when we attempt to re-start.
Faulting application dispwork.exe, version 7000.146.14.41964, faulting module dispwork.exe, version 7000.146.14.41964, fault address 0x000000000003b6af.
The application, E:\usr\sap\SDF\SYS\exe\run\disp+work.exe, generated an application error The error occurred on 09/30/2008 @ 17:17:31.889 The exception generated was c0000005 at address 000000000043B6AF (disp_work!DpVmcCheckDebugProxy)
Please investigate AND let me know.....ASAP.
With Regards,
Lolla.

Hi Brahmankar,
After installing we can able to enter via sap* for installing license.
But after installing when we restart the system then only problem is coming as above.....
please help in this regard.
With Regards,
Lolla.

LV 8.6 will Not Compile in LV 2010 - Labview 10.0 Development System Has Encountered a Problem and Needs to Close

I submitted this support request to NI on 8/12/2010.
When I compile my LV 8.6 app in LV2010 I get this error:
"LabVIEW 10.0 Development System has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience."
I was told to do a "Mass Compile" of my LV 8.6 app in LV2010...this failed too.
I was then told to go to each and every vi and "Mass Compile" individually...after about the 50th vi this got old quickly...and it still didn't compile. I then sent NI tech support "my code". The good news is my LV 8.6 app didn't compile with LV2010 @ NI.
My LV 8.6 app compiles and runs great in LV 8.6. I don't want to be left behind with the newer upgrades and I want to move to LV2010. I have lots of LV8.6 code to maintain and I really don't have the time to debug all of my apps.
I was told this will be looked @ in LV2010 SP1.
One note...back up your LV8.6 data before you move to LV2010. Once your LV8.6 code is compiled in LV2010 you will not be able to go back to LV8.6.
I restored all of my LV8.6 code and I'm back working with LV8.6.
It's a tough call, do I stay in LV8.6 and get left behind?
Do I bite the bullet and try to debug this mess in LV2010?
I was told the compiler is completely different in LV2010. That's great, but one reason I have NI Maintenance Agreement is to keep updated with the latest software. I can't afford to re-compile LV code every few years. Like most people, maintaining my Apps with customer's revisions, and modifications is enough work. I don't want more work!
I was told LV2010 SP1 would likely appear in May or June of 2011. I'd hate to break out my old Turbo Pascal apps again...but hey...they still work! My NI maintenance agreement is due this month too, I guess I'll pay NI one more year, and see if they come up with a solution. But if NI doesn't fix this LV8.6 compile in LV2010 problem...I don't see any value staying current with LV software.
I found another Bug with LV2010...you are going to love this one!
There is a new "LV Update Service". Perfect! I like updating my LV software when new patches are available. When I click "update" the update spins over and over "Checking for New Version". I have let it run ALL day with no results...just sits and spins over and over.
OK, I know give NI a break! Yes, LV2010 has a new compiler...and Yes, I will renew my NI maintenance agreement. I just want NI to know failing to compile just one LV8.6 app in LV2010 is not a good idea for customer relations.
Thanks,
Doug

For your update service problem
Unable to Update Current Version of NI Update Service
Why am I Unable to Update My Version of NI Update Service in Windows Vista or Windows 7?

Problems Setting Up Developer Users

I am having a problem setting up developer users and I am trying to determine if I am missing a step or if there is a configuration problem on my staging and production systems.
What I want to do should be very simple. I want to create a user that can create an application and see the information under the "Application" tab in the Navigator.
I have created the user using the following steps on 3.0.9.82 for Unix:
1. Create the user
2. Make the user a full administrator (rather than end user)
3. Make the user a member of the portal_developers group
4. Make the user's default group the portal_developers group
However, when I do this the user does not see the information under the
"Application" tab. The only way I can get the user to see the info under the
"Application" tab is to make him a member of the Portal_administrators
and/or DBA group. Both my staging and production boxes have the same result.
Does anyone have any thoughts or suggestions on what might be happening?

Thank you- I have read through that thread and can see some resonance with my issue.
My AOL emails work VERY fast with BB, in fact almost simultaneously received on PC & Torch " ping ping!"
This issue only raised its ugly head when I had 2 Torches replaced by my insurers.
Whilst the claim was in process I used a new Curve, loaded from backup on PC to keep emails going and of course phone & web facilities. ( I use the BB to power internet via bluetooth to my PC / laptop when living on a remote island with no phone lines or power supplies) All was fine. Swapping email accounts took a few minutes with the usual password confirmations for each AOL screenname etc.
Then the new Torches came back from insurers, and I tried to swap devices. Phoning & texting is fine. Al data and contacts swap over fine.
SETUP email accounts.............stymied every time. It says repeatedly that my user name/password is invalid etc etc etc
Have tried security wipes. Have tried setting up new BB ID & passwords on PC website. All is OK until I try to setup emails on the Torches. This has used up ridiculous amounts of time- all wasted.
I love the BB phones and the fast email push......in fact I recently bought a new Sony Xperia Z1 but sent it back because of wifi coverage meant no emails on that superb phone for lots of the time.
Good old BB I said..........I always get emails wherever I am. ( Rural Scotland has very patchy radio & wifi coverage)
Was about to purchase new Z10s just to get a bigger screen, but now I am averse to buying ANY BB phone again because this present mess means I may never get emails set up again. How nuts is that?
Many thanks for all help & suggestions..........boy do I need them!!
Kind wishes from West of Scotland
Fair winds and kind landfalls

"Open VI Reference" slowly in development system

Hello,
One of our programs has a plugin structure. We open more than 50 VIs over VI Server. This is fast in runtime system, but slowly in the development system. The problem is the function "Open VI Reference". If you try to open an Ref to a very small vi, it takes nearly 2s per VI. In runtime system this is done in 2-4ms.
So the program takes ages to start in development system.
Is there a way to speed this up?
Thanks
Sletrab
Attachments:
Bild348.png ‏99 KB

Is it always slow or fast the first time? Could it be that you're not closing the ref afterwards?
And/or debugging setting in the vi's,, which ofcourse is turned off in a .exe
/Y
LabVIEW 8.2 - 2014
"Only dead fish swim downstream" - "My life for Kudos!" - "Dumb people repeat old mistakes - smart ones create new ones."
G# - Free award winning reference based OOP for LV

Is there a way to activate the whole application in Non Development system?

Hi All,
Is there a way to activate the whole application in Non Development system? Using some BRF Plus Tool.
We copied a sample application and customized the same as per our requirement. The same is then released to Test System for testing. On Test system this application with all component is in non-active state. We re activated the application with all the component and released it to Test System. But still the application is inactive.
Application is a of storage type system and so cannot use changeability exit to activate on test system.
TR log shows imported with error. Below is the extract of the error:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
BRF+: Runtime client: 000 / target client: 400
BRF+: Object activation of new version started for 418 object IDs
BRF+: <<< *** BEGIN: Content from Application Component CA *** >>>
BRF+: <<< BEGIN: Messages for IDs (53465BA36D8651B0E1008000AC11420B/ ) Table 'Dunning Proposal Line Items (Table)' >>>
No active version found for 23.04.2014 08:14:10 with timestamp
No active version found for IT_FKKMAVS with timestamp 23.04.2014 08:14:10
No active version found for IT_FKKMAVS with timestamp 23.04.2014 08:14:11
BRF+: <<< END : Messages for IDs (53465BA36D8651B0E1008000AC11420B/ ) Table 'Dunning Proposal Line Items (Table)' >>>
BRF+: <<< *** END : Content from Application Component CA *** >>>
BRF+: Object activation failed (step: Activate )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
BRF+: Import queue update with RC 12
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Errors occurred during post-handling FDT_AFTER_IMPORT for FDT0001 T
FDT_AFTER_IMPORT belongs to package SFDT_TRANSPORT
The errors affect the following components:
   BC-SRV-BR (BRFplus - ABAP-Based Business Rules)
Post-import method FDT_AFTER_IMPORT completed for FDT0001 T, date and time: 20140423011412
Post-import methods of change/transport request DE1K901989 completed
     Start of subsequent processing ... 20140423011359
     End of subsequent processing... 20140423011412
Any help would be appreciated.

Is IT_FKKMAVS part of the same transport request or was it sent already earlier?
You may have a look at the request if it was OK. Probably not.
Maybe in the meantime more requests reached the system that now have in combination solved the problem. What is your release and support package level?
Higher versions of BRFplus have a lot of automatic correction mechanisms built into it.
E.g. problematic imports are collected in an import queue. As soon as a request comes in that fixes any problems the after import processing for faulty imports is automatically redone.

Data not loading in Development system( Urgent)

Dear SDNs,
Am loading data in development system... The message in status tab is Error message from the source system
Diagnosis
An error occurred in the source system.
System response
Caller 09 contains an error message.
Further analysis:
The error occurred in Service API .
Refer to the error message.
Procedure
How you remove the error depends on the error message.
Note
If the source system is a Client Workstation, then it is possible that the file that you wanted to load was being edited at the time of the data request. Make sure that the file is in the specified directory, that it is not being processed at the moment, and restart the request.
I tried to reload the data but am getting the same kind of error message...
I checked out whether the source system connection is OK or not... While am checking the source system connection I got an error message like as follows
<b>BW unknown in source system
The BW IDoc type ZSIA035 is not the same as the source system IDoc type
The following errors occurred in the source system:
EDI: Partner profile not available
Entry in inbound table not found
Entry in outbound table not found
Entry in outbound table not found</b>
Wat kind of action does we follow in this situation...
Kindly Advice me...
Answering getz appreciated...
Warm Regards,
<i>Aluri</i>

Hi Aluri,
I do faced the same problem before....
Is RFC connections and Partner Profiles are done properly between BW system and R/3 systems.........
If it has done properly....... Try to Activate the R/3 source system at BW side...
Still if you are getting the same error..
Right click on R/3 Source system at BW -> select Resore....
It will ask you RFCUSER passward for BW adn R/3
After doing it also still if you get the errors ...
Try to configure the all these steps....
Step 1: Create a Logical System at BW and R/3 side using t-code SALE
Step 2: Create the RFC Connection between BW to R/3 and R/3 to BW using the SM59 and Do the Test Connection and Remote login
Step 3: Create the Port Number for IDOC processing at R/3 and BW sides using WE21
Step4 : Create the Partner Profiles at R/3 and BW sides using the WE20
Specify the Inbound and Outbound parameters at R/3 and BW
For to know message types follow the link.....
http://wiki.ittoolbox.com/index.php/HOWTO:Re-Connect_R/3_and_BW
Check this Link also...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/72/c18ee5546a11d182cc0000e829fbfe/content.htm
After doing all these things now come to BW
Create R/3 Source System at AWB....
Hope it Helps...
Regards,
Kiran Telkar
* Assign points if it helps your requirement * *

Editing expressions in non-development systems.

Our first use of BRF+ met a large success among our business key users and they are requesting now the maintenance of some decision tables.
We therefore followed the guidelines of document "editing BRF+ component in non-development systems" and implemented interface IF_FDT_APPLICATION_SETTINGS.
All went fine on this part, but we hit major troubles with the authorization parts.
Due to the fact that our application was defined as 'customizing', we keep having message "System settings do not allow changes for customizing objects" and asks for authorization object S_TRANSPRT in production.
Having the application set to 'customizing' was not the best idea, as all objects created afterwards inherited automatically from this property.
Is there any way to force the status of specific expressions (not all at it would not make sense) from customizing to master data ?

As Christian explained you may split your use case in two applications.
I anyway recommend for bigger use cass to put function and (shared) data objects into a system application and rules into a customizing application. In scenarios where you frequently need to change rules you can also use a master data application, not only customizing.
However, we have seen several issues with customers changing rules in the productive system (be it master data or be it customizing with the application exit). The problems are
missing checks for activation of changes (although customers could implement exist for any specific checks they want)
conflicts with imports (again, customers could implement custom code in exits to prevent some of the issues)
missing activation workflow (also here custom solutions may help)
times where BRFplus may fall back into interpretation mode because of changes happening in parallel
As a consequence I generally do not recommend changing rules in productive systems directly. Instead my recommendation is NW Decision Service Management which provides you all the tools to perform your changes, test them, deploy (with or without release workflow) and use them (always generated code).
- Features of DSM

Building Installer Crashes Developement System LV2014SP1

Dear Community
I have again a major problem which can not be reproduced up to now.
Hopefully somebody has an idea.
I have a large project (including some LV classes, dll Calls (Hdf5), and Network shared Variables) which was fine since about one month ago.
Now I did some work on the project: The building of the application still works fine but then ************************
when I want to create the installer of the application (not depending on the additional installers I use) the whole developement system crashes completely.
The last line of the application builder progress window shows:
Adding file:
Labview Elemental IO-error.txt
It seems when it trys to add this file the system crashes and I am not able to build the installer.
This is a major problem because we need to roll out the new version to the costumer.
Hope somebody has an idea what to test next (I already did intense testing even on a different computer with the same project **so even the developement system installation may not be corrupt**)
Eventually there may be a problem with my 'alway include' files but I dont know where and w.
Hope you have some idea
Thanks
Nottilie

I think I found the problem and unfortunately it seems to be related to the Viewpoint TSVN Toolkit.
See the following log from the crash report:
<DEBUG_OUTPUT>
6/24/2015 5:48:18.059 PM
DWarn 0x50CBD7C1: Got corruption with error 1097 calling library mxLvProvider.mxx function mxLvApi_SetIconOverlaysBatch
e:\builds\penguin\labview\branches\2014patch\dev\source\execsupp\ExtFuncRunTime.cpp(247) : DWarn 0x50CBD7C1: Got corruption with error 1097 calling library mxLvProvider.mxx function mxLvApi_SetIconOverlaysBatch
minidump id: acdc1a8d-51cf-450c-8d63-fbc10cdecd70
$Id: //labview/branches/2014patch/dev/source/execsupp/ExtFuncRunTime.cpp#1 $
What does creating a LabVIEW installer have to do with icon overlays? I have no idea, but I know something that is LabVIEW related that uses icon overlays in the project – the Viewpoint TSVN Toolkit! I promptly uninstalled the toolkit and I was able to build all 4 of my installers without a hitch multiple times. Additionally, I’ve noticed that LabVIEW is much more responsive and launch time has been cut from ~60sec to ~20sec.
Although this seemed to have fixed the problem (I tested on two machines both exhibiting the same behavior and both having the toolkit installed) I am dissapointed that I no longer have the TSVN toolkit because it was extremely useful.
I recently upgraded to the latest 1.8.2.23 version of the TSVN toolkit, I'm going to instead install the previous version(s) until I see the problem go away (hopefully.)
Does anybody here use the latest TSVN toolkit and have zero issues building an installer that has an app that uses shared variables? I'm not sure if the shared variables part is relevant but it might be.

LabVIEW 2011 Development System fails to install

I have just tried several times to install my new copy of LabVIEW 2011 Dev Suite, but get an unknown exception (with no details - see attached picture) right at the start of installing the development system (English 32-bit). I have rebooted and closed all applications including virus scanning but still the same. I am using WinXP Pro SP3, and already have LV 8.6, 2009, and 2010 installed. I'm completely baffled as this type of problem has never occurred before and there is no information about the cause of the exception.
Mike
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
LV2011 Unknown Exception.JPG ‏10 KB

Hi John,
After clicking on Details, the words "No information" or similar are displayed. I have tried again today but with the same result. I have attached a new screenshot showing the installer initialisation progress window. I have checked the DVD and it looks undamaged, and there is plenty of free disk space.
Attachments:
LV2011 Unknown Exception.JPG ‏64 KB

CHARM activation check failing on "consolidation system for development system SSA-200 in project ZTEST2

Hello,
We are implementing Charmlite and want to activate in project landscape.
We are Solution Manager 7.1 SP11 and testing this scenario in sandbox.
Steps completed:
1. in sandbox domain controller, created two virtual systems and made 3 system landscape, where, I can release the transport and see it in QA system (Virtual system buffer)
2. The LMDB has been updated with Virtual system and in SMSY, the entries of virtual system shows up. The logical components have the client information.
Issue:
in /nsolar_project_admin ->System landscape -> change management, When consistency check is performed, we get error message saying
Virtual RFC is miising (I am guessing, it should be okay)
The logical component is incosistent (This might be the reason the CHARM is not getting activated.
"No consolidation system for development system SSA-200 in project ZTEST2
No track for project ZTEST2 with log. system SSA/200"
For me, when i look in satellite system, the consolidation system is a virtual system and it should be fine.
Please advise
Regards,
Durga PK Saitana

Thank you Karthik. Still the problem persists
I went through the blog earlier. I created l ABAP instance manually in SLD and moved into LMDB and can see the entry in SMSY. (I did not see any option of putting virtual flag)
We were trying harmonization of RFC from note 1384598 and since we had virtual systems, went with domain links.
After domain links, the virtual systems are read. the Dev ABAP system is not able to find the consolidated system. In the satellite system, I can release transport and move the transport.
Not sure, why this issue is persistent.

Testing in development system

I specify J2EE of NWDI as Development system, in order to test my scenario. A DC has been built and checked-in successfully from NWDS. However, I couldn't be able to launch the scenario with the url as indicated in application.xml. How can I check if my development has been transferred to CBS, and how to find out the problem here?
Thanks

Successful activation means that CBS built the DC(s) successfully.

TestStand Activated Deployed System reset to Evaluation Development System

We have a test system which has TestStand with an activated deployed license. The test system has not been in use for a while and as some new units are due in to be tested, it was powered-on. The original mouse on the system had gone missing, so a new one was fitted instead. Windows saw this as a hardware change.
When TestStand ran, it loaded the TestStand Evaluation Development system instead of the deployed system.
Looking at the License Manager, there does not seem to be any way of disabling the Evaluation, (until it expires in 30 days), and using the deployed system, (which it shows as activated).
Any suggestions ?

Thanks for that.
I have deactivated and reactivated the deployment license and that stops the Evaluation box displaying when I select the icon for the Operator Interface for my sequence.
However, have noticed that the Evaluation Full Development Teststand is still there if I select the Sequence Editor, (at least for the next 5 days).
This is not a big problem, but I am concerned that in the future if someone uses a different mouse/keyboard then this problem will reappear.
It sound like a TestStand bug, as it should at least give you the option of not enabling the Evaluation Development system if the hardware 'changes'.

Full production refresh to development systems and Charm?

Hi SDN Community,
Where I work we have a policy of refreshing the development systems (ECC, CRM, APO, BI, SRM) on an annual basis with full production system data, HR data is subsequently wiped clean from the development system.
For each of our systems we have a development system, a QA system and a production system.
The decision to do these full refreshes was taken to ensure that developers and configurers can do decent testing in the Dev environments - prior to transporting to our QA system - to ensure that we have a reasonably stable QA system. Prior to the refreshes - QA was considered too unstable by our business to be used as a good test platform - the full D refreshes solved this problem.
We have recently installed SAP Charm (Change request management) which is a solution manager based product that manages the transportation of objects in change requests - attached to maintenance cycles.
During our first development system refresh we discovered that all open Charm projects (maintenance cycles) were placed into an unuseable status due to the refresh. This means we had to rebuild all of the Charm projects after the refresh - which took a considerable amount of time + resources and delayed project work. We don't want to be in this situation again for our next refresh.
SAPs response to us has been that they have no other customer that does full Development system refreshes - and also has Charm. I wonder if this is accurate, I think what SAP are saying is that they don't have many Charm customers... Is refreshing Development so uncommon?
We are considering products like SAPs TDMS - and alternatives (eg gold client) - but most of these appear a little immature - for refreshing complex system landscapes - such as ours and keeping everything in synch after the refresh.
My questions to SDN -
What do you do - do you do full refreshes to your D systems?
If not - what are the arguments against refreshing D systems (is this considered bad practice)?
Are there any other Charm customers out there in a similar situation to us?
How do you manage the stability of your QA environments and stop the transport into QA systems of untested changes - if your D systems are not similar to you production system
(note we have some 300 active users in just our ECC development system)?
Any suggestions / recommendations as to how to best proceed would be greatly appreciated.
many thanks in advance,
Julian Phillips
Edited by: Julian Phillips on Nov 11, 2008 2:33 PM

Thanks Naushad for your reply,
I wonder if D refreshes are less common - more due to the additional hardware costs incurred (disk space needed to store full production data is usually pretty large) to do them - than due to avoiding disrupting development - probably a bit of both.
I did not mention this - but in our refresh we do reimport all transports that we open prior to the refresh - which used to solve our problems - in terms of restoring active changes - but with SAPs Charm system - this approach does not work as the Charm projects are left in an inconsistent status.
We are now leaning towards introducing a 4th set of systems into our landscape - so that we have the following platforms:
Development ---> Pre QA ---> QA ---> Production
This approach will allow us to keep both the Pre QA and QA systems refreshed every 6 months or so - and our new Dev system - we will refresh very infrequently (every 5 years perhaps) if at all. We will tie the Charm system to our new development - and this system will then not be impacted by refreshes. This approach means additional hardware cost - but as it happens we have a few spare boxes - so this maybe our best bet.
The core reason for our refresh is so that we will be able to preserve the stability of our QA test platform - which for us is the critical factor here. If QA has poorly tested work in it - we run a higher risk of disrupting other testing and also of this poorly tested work reaching production.
When we used to have a development system as you described and just the single QA box - we experienced frequent instability in our QA box - due to poorly tested working reaching it - and this delayed numerous projects.
Does anyone else have a 4 box setup like this? Anyone else encountered this on an SAP project anywhere? Pros / Cons of this approach?
//Julian
Edited by: Julian Phillips on Nov 12, 2008 8:08 AM
Edited by: Julian Phillips on Nov 12, 2008 8:18 AM

System Landscape (Dual Development System)

Dear SAP Experts,
We have Two-System Landscape(DEV-PRD) Whereas cross-client data is used in both the Customizing and quality assurance clients.
Currently, our company, just merged with another non-SAP-using company. The First move is to implement FI module and subsequently, all modules that we are now using.
My boss discussed with me if we could create another DEV server for company B to use for their customizing and QA clients as not to impenge on our already customized set up.
Please advise if this set up is possible, and if not, Can anyone kindly give an advise how to approach my problem?
I'll give good points for the help that i can get.
Best Regards,
Jay

You can do this. We currently have two Dev environments one for projects based on NetWeaver integration with our ECC systems and one for regular development / run and maintain.
I suggest doing a system copy of your development and rename the SID / hostname were it appears in the profiles and home directories for UNIX platforms. Then perform post steps for SE06, printers, profiles, RFC etc...
For Microsoft install a CI instance and do a database copy to have current data. Then do post copy steps in SAP.
Although SAP suggests not to refresh Development systems, we do it at least once a year to get current applicaiton data.
Think of it as a sandbox.
If you don't want to integrate your data with the new system, skip the database copy portion for Microsoft and do a fresh install for Unix.
Hope this helps.

Problem in BW development system.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for