Problem in invoice verification

Greetings...
We have a problem with an incoming invoice in the MIRO. This invoice has several purchase orders. When we try to post it, the system shows the M8783 error: "Avereage price becomes negative" for a material in a plant.
This company code uses the avereage prices, we've checked the material master data and costs and they're ok, the purchase orders, and it is ok too.
What can we do to solve this problem?
Thank you

Hi,
     Check what deviations you have between the invoice prices and the PO/GR Prices, especially if you are making multiple postings to the same material.
eg in April   5 deliveries/POs each of 10 parts @$10 per part. GLD=10
             When the invoice for the deliveries is to be posted there are only 10 parts in stock. The actual price is $5.
Posting of invoice for 1 delivery:
                       Vendor      Cr      50
                        GR/IR       Dr    100
                        Stock       Cr      50    GLD = 5
Posting of invoice for 2 nd delivery:
                       Vendor      Cr      50
                        GR/IR       Dr    100
                        Stock       Cr      50    GLD = 0 !!!!
Posting of invoice for 3 nd delivery:
                       Vendor      Cr      50
                        GR/IR       Dr    100
                        Stock       Cr      50    > Error Negative GLD.
The only solution in such a scenario is to repair the GLD with MR21 inbetween the postings.
Kind regards

Similar Messages

Problem while invoice verification :LMR1M001

Hi,
I am using enhancement assignment LMR1M001 to check MIRO document postings, for this I have written code in function module exit (EXIT_SAPLMRMP_010) include ZXM08U16.
When i checked in development server its getting triggred but in production when i check with session break point, control does not reach the include.
Please help me solve this issue.
Thanks,
Sai.

Hello Gurus ,
                             I am also facing the same problem in am also working on same LMR1M001 , i write code but it is not executing .
I simply want to print an error massage when the material is in Quality control stock .
Is there any other way to do it help me .
Thanks and Regards
Shrikant Ambulkar

During invoice verification- error "Invoice Quantity exceeds GR quantity".

Dear friends,
Myclientisfacing a problem during invoice verification(invoice quantity exceeds GR quantity).
user created PO withtwo line items. in first line item he used account assignment K (cost center) for cable purchase. and inthe second line item he used account assignment category -K and item category -D for cableinstallation charges. foe firat line item he created GR(migo) and for the secondlineitem being service he did service entry sheet(ML81N). while doing invoice verification they got the error "Invoice Quantity exceeds GR quantity". so we tried to post the first lineitemand it was successfully posted.while doing invoice verification for second line item it is throwing "Invoice Quantity exceeds GR quantity".
please help me in this to solve the issue.
Thanksin advance.
Regards,
william

Hi,
Please check that if your second line item which happened to be service line item as you have mentioned have the service base invoice verification checked in the invoice tab of second line item (line item detail level). If so the you need to post your service entry sheet after releasing it. System will generate a 101 movement material document in the back ground.
Hope it helps.
BR

Excise Duty (IS-OIL) - Invoice verification and accounting ED

Hello experts,
I have a case in my importation process with excise duty (IS-OIL). I have the following scenario: Purchasing Ed free material and receive it in ED paid Storage Location. So I use Handling type 00 and Valuation type TAX in the PO excise duty item data. I woul like to kwon Which is the standard process for the invoice verification of the excise duty cost when the handling type is 00 and the valuation type TAX?. And How can I do the invoice verification (MIRO) if there is not a specific line in the purchase order history for the excise duty cost?
I have another case in the accounting of movement type 301 (transfer posting between 2 plants). The accounting posting is the following:
Examle:
Account                       Transaction
1. STOCK FUEL          S                    BSX (Stock account)
2. STOCK FUEL            H             BSX (Stock account)
3. STOCK EXCISE DUTY     S             SVO (ED Account)
4. EXCISE DUTY FUEL           H             ZZP (ED Account)
The problem is that the 4th account must be STOCK EXCISE DUTY ACCOUNT from SVO transaction.
I would be grateful if someone could help me with these cases.
Thank in advance.
Pablo

Dear Prashant,
Thanks for reply, but i checked my excise cond types, in all conditions, cond cat is blank & cond class 'A' is maintained i.e. Discount & Surcharge.
My problem is that, my excise value is not got posted in net receivable value in accounts. This problem arise, when we make sales order, Net Value field doesn't pick excise there & while invoicing, it post only the base value & rounding off adjustments at header level. I don't know, from where this Net Value field in sales order is picking the value but my problem will solve if my grand total value(base valueexciseedu cess+higher edu cess) will pass to Net Value field while making sales order. Kindly help.

EDI - Incoming Invoice Error and GR based Invoice Verification - 51 No GR

Hi,
We are implementing EDI for incoming invoices and use Goods Receipts based Invoice Verification. When processing an inbound IDOC Invoice (type INVOIC01) where the Goods Receipt has not yet been posted, then Inbound IDOC is siiting at Error Status, 51 - No GR documents found.
Is there any way we can process this as a Parked Invoice or for Verification in the background (MIRA)? because the current situation is a problem, as 95% of our Inbound Invoices will be received electronically before the Goods are Received.
The actual Vendor's delivery note is stored in the segment E1EDP02 (Qualifier 016), field BELNR.
Currently the IDOC as to sit in error until the Vendor's Delivery Note is Goods Receipted which can be several days later - SAP OSS Note 393883 fro 2001 suggests doing this, but surely this is a common situation. The IDOC sitting in error in WE02 in the list of IDOCs is difficult to isolate from true errors.
If this is was mnaul Invoice it could be processed through MIRA for background Invoice Verification later with program RMBABG00.
We havd SAP version ECC 6.0
I have spotted OSS Note 501524 which implies that is possible automatically Park Incoming EDI IDOC Invoices, has anyone tried this? and what would be the transaction/program that could be used to post several at once when the GR has been processed (similar to RMBABG00)

Hi ,
You can use the program RBDMANI2 which will reprocess all the IDOCs (EDIinvoices )that have failed . You can schedule this program in the background and it will post all failed invoices which have the GR posted later .
We had the same scenario and we have scheduled this program as a daily job at night .
Regards,
Hari.

Same nr range in Logistics Invoice Verification for the MM and FI document

I customised Logistics Invoce verification (on ECC6) with the same nr range for MM and FI. That were done by changing the nr range of doc type RE (in FI) to nr range 52 andcreated the nr range for the company code for fiscal year 2007 and 2008 (our fiscal year 2008 start 1.10.07) and made it external nr assignment. In MM I changed RD and RS to a new range 05 to which I assigned the nr range 5200000000 to 5299999999 (internally assigned). For the vendor consignment I created a new document type and assign that to nr range 51 (as the original invoice verification settings).
This process works quite nice with the same document nr for MM and FI, however I still do have a problem. (I work through the article on above as per FI Expert issue of Sept 07, but even in there my problem was not mentioned.
If I do an invoice verification for previous period with price changes on the system, Sap want to post 2 accounting docs (1 for the previous month - on which I did have stock and 1 for current month - one which I did not have any stock). The system only send 1 document nr for FI who needs 2 doc nrs. I now get the error message that I must use a document in the nr range 5200000000 and 529999999.
How do I rectify this or can I not use this functionality if we allow backdating to the previous period
Regards
Anna-Marie Robson

I customised Logistics Invoce verification (on ECC6) with the same nr range for MM and FI. That were done by changing the nr range of doc type RE (in FI) to nr range 52 andcreated the nr range for the company code for fiscal year 2007 and 2008 (our fiscal year 2008 start 1.10.07) and made it external nr assignment. In MM I changed RD and RS to a new range 05 to which I assigned the nr range 5200000000 to 5299999999 (internally assigned). For the vendor consignment I created a new document type and assign that to nr range 51 (as the original invoice verification settings).
This process works quite nice with the same document nr for MM and FI, however I still do have a problem. (I work through the article on above as per FI Expert issue of Sept 07, but even in there my problem was not mentioned.
If I do an invoice verification for previous period with price changes on the system, Sap want to post 2 accounting docs (1 for the previous month - on which I did have stock and 1 for current month - one which I did not have any stock). The system only send 1 document nr for FI who needs 2 doc nrs. I now get the error message that I must use a document in the nr range 5200000000 and 529999999.
How do I rectify this or can I not use this functionality if we allow backdating to the previous period
Regards
Anna-Marie Robson

While invoice verification system calculating tax on delivery costs also

hi Guru's
i am facing problem that , wile invoice verification system calculating tax on delivery costs also , and when i am removing tax code in front of dilivery costs , invoice is not posting , i can use zero tax code for delivery costs , but i dont want to use any tax code for delivery cost , what should i do
please help

HI,
invoice is not posting , i can use zero tax code for delivery costs , but i don't want to use any tax code for delivery cost , what should i do
You have to use tax code for that with ZERO tax code,its like import condition where we used zero tax code
No other option!!!
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Invoice Verification process with multiple payments

Please advise us on the Invoice Verification process in case of multiple payments required for single Quantity Purchase Order Lines. [ i.e. If the quantity of Purchase is 1 and we need to process multiple invoices involving partial amount of the PO value, we end up in decimal errors in many cases. ]
For e.g. we had a case were the Total PO amount was 7638, against quantity 1. A partial invoice was raised for amount 7545. We were unable to determine the exact quantity in the invoice document to derive the said amount. This was due to the limitation in the quantity field which is only supporting 3 decimals. Subsequent to this, we need to round off and also this caused problems in the next payment lot. The issue becomes more complicated when there is header discount , freight etc. specified in the PO Header Conditions.
This resulted in the discrepancy between Goods Receipt and Invoice Receipt Amounts for such POs.
Please throw us some light to tackle this issue as per the best practices available in SAP.
Also in this relation, Is it possible to enforce Quantity Tolerance in PO.

HI,
What you can do to over come such problem, is Put the Value Figure in Quantity field & Quantity in Net price field,
As the Qty is 1, The total Amount paid to vendor will be same & no Need of calculating decimal.
While making GRN, Put the actual Invoice value as qty.
Hope this serves the purpose.
Regards
Mascot

Invoice verification only after quality acceptance

The GR stage to Invoice verfication as detailed below:
1. Once material comes in, the store will check the documents and check the PO and prepare GRN.
2. Then, Quality will check the quantity and quality of the item and make necessary QM entry for acceptance / Rejection in the system.
3. Finance does the Invoice verfication and makes the payment depending on the due date.
However, a serious problem arises in this present process at Invoice verfication stage ie., suppose the quality makes delay in checking the quantity and quality of the item and subsequent acceptance / Rejection, there is a scope for making the payment to the vendor even for rejected items since the system allows you to process invoice verification for GRN quantity and make the payment for the same. It is very difficult to recover from the vendor towards rejected items when once the payment is done.
Therefore, we need some control in the system at Invoice verfiication stage that the system should not allow us to verify the Invoice for GRN quantity instead the system should allow us to make invoice verification only for accepted quantity by quality.
Is there any method to do this ?

Hi,
If the material is in quality system should not allow to post Invoice verification. Is it your requirement ? Pls correct me if im wrong.
The above requirement can achieve with standard SAP settings. You need to activate QM settings for the plant.
In material master select the Quality Management view, in procuremen data, in QM control key field, select 0007(i.e.Delivery release, Invoice block).
If the material is in quality you cant post invoice.
reg
Durga
*Assign points if the info is useful

PO - GR based Invoice Verification/ IR Indicator

Hi,
I am facing a problem with the IR indicator in PO. The scenario is a SC is created, a PO is created automatically out of the SC and then a GR confirmation has to be done against the PO. I am using a service product.
In the vendor master, I have set the "Goods-Receipt-Based Invoice Verification" indicator and "Invoice Receipt Expected" indicator.
Now, if I create PO manually then these 2 indicators are defaulted into the PO follow-on documents indicator values. However, when the PO is created automatically from the SC only the IR expected indicator is set so I am not able to create a confirmation against the PO.
The same way, if I set the "Invoice Receipt Expected" indicator and "Indicator:GR Conf.Expectd" indicator in the vendor master then only the "Indicator:GR Conf.Expectd" is set in the PO (created from SC) and not the IR indicator.
Can someone suggest to me what could the problem be since a manual creation of PO picks up the indicator values from the vendor but it does not when created from a SC?
Many Thanks,
Saravanan.

hi,
See the foll related threads/Links/pointers:
Re: Confirmation for PO without SC
Error Indicator for GR-based invoice verification when order PO
Re: Receiving Services as Materials in order not to perform goods receipt
Re: Indicator u0093GR Conf Expectedu0094 in Business Partner
Invoice Receipt Expected controlled from R/3 Vendor master
Vendor Data Replication Problem
869055 "Follow-on Documents" PO EBP Confirmation Flag 20.05.2006
912428 509(SE) Account assignment for entry sheet missing 19.01.2006
886307 Creating follow-on docs in the Order Collaboration scenario 18.10.2005
518340 EBP: Tolerance checks with goods receipt and invoice 08.06.2005
502981 EBP: Terminatn w/ invoice creatn for back-end purchase order 08.06.2005
450068 EBP: Checks to invoice for BE purchase order incorrect 08.06.2005
834270 IV inbox message BBP_BD 002: "Invoice will be .. 13.05.2005
784775 Goods receipt-based invoice verification indicator part 2
BR,
Disha.

Document contains some order item more than once - invoice verification

Hi,
we have one cross company stock transfer process in which when a billing is created in SD side, an IDOC will be triggered automatically and create an invoice verification at the MM side.
The problem is some of our billing of this process having an IDOC application error that said.
Document contains same order item more than once
Message no. M8321
Diagnosis
Under the following circumstances, you can settle an order item in an invoice received via EDI more than once:
- Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification has been defined for the order item.
- The IDoc contains the delivery note numbers of the goods receipts.
System Response
If this is not the case, the system cancels posting of the IDoc.
Question:
1 - The funny thing is IDOC showing 51 IDOC error code message on status record of INVOIC. But the invoice verfication get created in PO history.
2 - I think this error is because we need to make the PO as GR-based Inverifcation. We have flagged it in Vendor master, and Info record, but this indicator is not flag automatically in the PO (and we cannot manually change the PO as this indicator is grey-out). How?
3 - how to solve this error?
Thanks

Once PO history is created, you cannot change the "GR-based-IV" flag. Two options are there before you.
1. Cancel all the GRs & Invoices posted in the STO then system will allow you to update the GR-based-IV flag. After updating this flag repost the GRs and invoices.
2. Create a new STO, now since you have updated the vendor maser & info-record, this flag will automatically get updated during the STO creation itself.
First option is tedious and should be selected only if you can go option 2 is not at all feasible

Logistic Invoice Verification

Hello,
Would You help me with input fields during Logistic Invoice Verification? We have GR-based invoice verification and purchase order is created with order unit, which differs from order price unit. For example, PO quantity is 10 packing units (1 PAC = 10 pieces) and price is 1EUR per 1 piece. Goods receipt is done in packing units, but invoice is sent to us in pieces. During invoice verification I want to enter quantity in purchase order price unit (this field is read for input) and I expect that system will automatically calculate quantity in order unit using denominator for converting condition units to base units. But it does not happen so. See an example: GR 9 PAC (=90pieces), quantity invoiced 100 pieces. In trn.MIRO I want to enter 100 pieces and 10 PAC should be calculated automatically.
Would You help me with this problem?
Best regards,
Natalija

Hi ,
LIV can be done with respect to GR . And system picks the data from PO and GR only . So there is no way you can change the unit in MIRO .
Its better you educate your vendor to send the invoice in units the way it has been made in PO .
Others can add to this if I am wrong .
Thanks
Dipak

Vendor Consignment Settlement - Invoice verification - MRKO

Hello All,
Can someone please let me know what I am missing in configuration, because when I try to settle via MRKO transaction get the message below. I have gone through configuration trying to figure out what I have missed. Since I don't see "settled" in the information text field it does not let me print any invoices. Just to let you guys know our system had all the KONS configuration deleted out. So I had copy them from our client 000. Please advise what am I missing. Thank you all for your help.
I get this message:
Consignmnt settlement: No message was found for partner 401170/compny code 1001
Message no. M8443
Diagnosis
You are settling consignment or pipeline liabilities for vendor 1001 in company code 401170. For the information of the vendor, a document is created using the message determination function.
System Response
If no message record was found for a partner because of the message control settings, meaning that no output message can be created, no invoice documents are created.
Procedure
In Customizing for Invoice Verification, check that the data for message determination has been maintained in such a way that an output message can be created for the vendors in the invoice document.
Regards,
Nav

Hello All,
I have setup output type KONS in MRM1 - Key combination as CoCode, Vendor, yet I am still experiencing problems. Do I need to modify MR_PRINT FORM or the Program "RM08NAST" I have gone through these configurations to setup KONS output type since it was not in our sandbox system.
Maintain Message Types
Maintain Message Schemas
Maintain Conditions - which is MRM1
Am I am missing something else?
Regards,
Nav

Blocked invoices in 4.6C (invoice verification)

Hi,
We need to have some reporting for our blocked invoices. It would be interesting if we could use transaction MRBR for these purposes but it doesn't work as there are no records in table rbkp_blocked (we don't use 'logisctics invoice verification' but the old 'invoice verification', apparently this doesn't use table rbkp_blocked).
We are kinda stuck on this problem. I find it very difficult to retreive the right data from table BSEG.
Can you help me with this problem. Do you know a report, do we have to develop it (taking data from table BSEG ?)
The requirement is : Reporting on blocked invoices that are either blocked for variances or blocked manually.
Any thoughts on this would be most welcome.
with regards
Erik

Hi
MRBR is report for blocked invoices.
There are three types of blocks
Block due to variances
Manually payment block
stochostically blocked
you need to try with either of one of these options, and see if your invoice shown. Otherwise your invoice is not blocked.
please check.
regards
Srinivas

GR-Based Invoice Verification

I am having problems with the GR-Based Invoice Verification flag in the POs.
Basically what I need is for the system to not allow me to post invoices over the good receipted quantity. I manage to get that control switching on the "GR-Based IV" flag in the PO, but at the cost of having to set the GR reference whenever I make an invoice.
Is there someway in which I could post invoices in the system without making reference to the good receipt material document number while keeping the check that does not allow me to invoice over the total GR amount?
Thanks

Hi,
you have to set the tolerance limit for the Invoce Verification for the respective Comapany Code.
goto, IMG - Material management - Logistice Invoice verification - Invoice Block - Set Tolerance limits (OMR6)
Set upper and Lower limits as zero.
BW: Percentage OPUn variance (GR before IR)
The system calculates the percentage variance between the following ratios: quantity invoiced in order price quantity units: quantity invoiced in order units and goods receipt quantity in order price quantity units : goods receipt quantity in order units. The system compares the variance with the upper and lower percentage limits defined.
Regards,
Pravin

Problem in invoice verification

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for