Problem receiving messages

OK, so I am doing the following, and I am not able to retrieve messages:
1) creating messages, appending a JMSCorrelationID that I set, sending them to a queue,
2) using an MDB processes them, sending an ObjectMessage to a different queue.
3) application has a JSP that refreshes every five seconds,, trying to retrieve the message using the following code:
String selector = "JMSCorrelationID = '" + corrId + "'";     
QueueReceiver noSelRecvr = session.createReceiver(respQueue, selector);
Message recMsg = noSelRecvr.receive(2500);     
Now, the corrID is the same ID as the one I put on the message when I sent it, and it's identical to the JMSCorrelationID that I set in the MDB when I put the message back into the queue. I have verified all this using debug statements.
When I try to recieve, I get nothing back every time. I get no error sending to the queue. How can I
a) confirm that the message is making it into the queue
b) figure out why the receive() method isn't finding it
I appreciate any help you folks can provide.

Arnaud,
Thanks for the reply - I will check out Hermes. I figured out that I am not able to retrieve messages from the queue without calling start() on my QueueConnection object. The example I was working off didn't mention that unfortunately. I am now able to send and receive messages successfully, so all is well for now.

Similar Messages

  • Problem receiving messages from M$ ISA Server...

    I'm having a problem receiving messages on our Ironport from a M$ ISA Server cluster at another organization. When they try to send us messages and they leave a specific machine (x.x.169.233) it doesn't work. When the messages leave the other machine (x.x.169.237), it works just fine. However, if the .233 machine gets turned off, the .237 machines then fails to send us messages as well. See the following injection debug logfile for specifics:
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:33 2005 Info: 18064693 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '220 mta1.RecipientDomain.edu ESMTP\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:33 2005 Info: 18064693 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'EHLO smtp.SenderDomain.edu\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:33 2005 Info: 18064693 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '250-mta1.RecipientDomain.edu\r\n250-8BITMIME\r\n250 SIZE 209715200\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:33 2005 Info: 18064693 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'MAIL FROM:<[email protected]> SIZE=4228\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:33 2005 Info: 18064693 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '250 sender <[email protected]> ok\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:33 2005 Info: 18064693 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'RCPT TO:<[email protected]>\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:33 2005 Info: 18064693 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '250 recipient <[email protected]> ok\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:33 2005 Info: 18064693 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'DATA\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:33 2005 Info: 18064693 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '354 go ahead\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:45 2005 Info: 18064718 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '220 mta1.RecipientDomain.edu ESMTP\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:45 2005 Info: 18064718 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'EHLO smtp.SenderDomain.edu\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:45 2005 Info: 18064718 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '250-mta1.RecipientDomain.edu\r\n250-8BITMIME\r\n250 SIZE 209715200\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:45 2005 Info: 18064718 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'MAIL FROM:<[email protected]> SIZE=4211\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:45 2005 Info: 18064718 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '250 sender <[email protected]> ok\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:45 2005 Info: 18064718 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'RCPT TO:<[email protected]>\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:45 2005 Info: 18064718 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '250 recipient <[email protected]> ok\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:45 2005 Info: 18064718 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'DATA\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:41:45 2005 Info: 18064718 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '354 go ahead\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:17 2005 Info: 18065031 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '220 mta1.RecipientDomain.edu ESMTP\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:17 2005 Info: 18065031 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'EHLO smtp.SenderDomain.edu\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:17 2005 Info: 18065031 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '250-mta1.RecipientDomain.edu\r\n250-8BITMIME\r\n250 SIZE 209715200\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:17 2005 Info: 18065031 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'MAIL FROM:<[email protected]> SIZE=4211\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:17 2005 Info: 18065031 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '250 sender <[email protected]> ok\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:17 2005 Info: 18065031 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'RCPT TO:<[email protected]>\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:17 2005 Info: 18065031 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '250 recipient <[email protected]> ok\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:17 2005 Info: 18065031 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'DATA\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:17 2005 Info: 18065031 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '354 go ahead\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:19 2005 Info: 18065033 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '220 mta1.RecipientDomain.edu ESMTP\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:19 2005 Info: 18065033 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'EHLO smtp.SenderDomain.edu\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:19 2005 Info: 18065033 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '250-mta1.RecipientDomain.edu\r\n250-8BITMIME\r\n250 SIZE 209715200\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:19 2005 Info: 18065033 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'MAIL FROM:<[email protected]> SIZE=4228\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:19 2005 Info: 18065033 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '250 sender <[email protected]> ok\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:19 2005 Info: 18065033 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'RCPT TO:<[email protected]>\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:19 2005 Info: 18065033 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '250 recipient <[email protected]> ok\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:19 2005 Info: 18065033 Rcvd from 'x.x.169.233': 'DATA\r\n'
    Tue Jun 14 15:45:19 2005 Info: 18065033 Sent to 'x.x.169.233': '354 go ahead\r\n'
    It seems to be failing consistently right after the DATA command. Has anyone else seen anything like this? M$ says they don't see anything wrong with the source system and they made vague references to "having problems sending to e-mail appliances in the past".
    Randle

    We've run into problems SENDING to MS servers in the past, when there was a SonicWall TZ170 between them, but I have never had a problem (that I am aware of) RECEIVING from an MS server. The symtoms were sortof similar though. We would send a period on a line by itself to terminate the message, but would never get the 250 Message Accepted message from the MS server. We found out that the TZ170 was dropping the packet. There was a firmware revision released about this time last year for the TZ170 that corrected the issue.
    Since this probably isn't exactly the case, but appears similar, you may want to sniff the connection and see if a packet is getting dropped by a firewall/router in the middle.

  • Problem receiving messages with Blackberry messenger

    I recently purchased the Blackberry 8130 Pearl.  While using the blackberry messenger I have an intermitant problem where I do not receive messages.  I have to remove the battery and restart the phone to receive the message.  Can anyone shed some light on this? 

       Y U No Help Me

  • Problem receiving message. 1 of 3 indicated but only receive first and restart Thunderbird and it will resend the first of 3 again.

    Have been having trouble receiving messages. An indication of 1 of 3 messages being loaded. The first message comes up and that's the end. I'll restart Thunderbird and the same indication happens - the same first message returns and then that is it. If you send me an email, I doubt whether I will be able to receive it.
    dmr

    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/New_messages_do_not_appear
    * https://support.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/kb/problems-sending-and-receiving-messages

  • OC4J 9.0.4: Problem receiving message from JMS queue

    I've created an application which puts XML files in a JMS queue and try to get it out again. The enqueing (sending) is no problem, but when I dequeue from the same queue I receive nothing and if I don't specify a wait time the programs hangs.
    If I create a QueueBrowser I can see there are messages in the queue.
    Can someone tell me what I do wrong?
    Here is the code of my dequeue action:
    public String dequeue(int qName) throws RbsSysException
            final String method = "dequeue(int qName)";
            _log.debug(method);
            QueueConnection queueConnection = null;
            try
                queueConnection = _queueConnectionFactory.createQueueConnection();
                QueueSession queueSession = queueConnection.createQueueSession(false,
                        Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
                QueueReceiver queueRcv = queueSession.createReceiver(getQueue(qName));
                _log.debug("queue = "+ queueRcv.getQueue().getQueueName());
                // Due to bug 3376983 in OC4J We cannot use TextMessage if it exceeds
                // 64 kb. Therefore use ObjectMessage.
                Message msg = queueRcv.receiveNoWait();
                _log.debug("msg = " + msg);
                ObjectMessage objMsg = (ObjectMessage)msg;
                //ObjectMessage objMsg = (ObjectMessage) queueRcv.receiveNoWait();
                _log.debug("objMsg = " + objMsg);
                if (objMsg != null)
                    return (String) objMsg.getObject();
                else
                    return null;
            catch (JMSException je)
                throw new RbsSysException(je);
            finally
                if (queueConnection != null)
                    try
                        queueConnection.close();
                    catch (Exception any)
                        _log.error("Error while closing QueueConnection: ", any);
        }

    Did you implement javax.jms.MessageListener and the method onMessage(Message)?
    If you use onMessage() as wel as receive (or receiveNoWait() or receive(long)), the onMessage() can be called, while the main thread is blocking on a synchronous receive, so make sure you use only one of the two methods: onMessage() or receive.
    Receive() blocks your thread until a message is published. So your program 'hangs' by design. Usually this is used when your program is waiting for a particular message. Otherwise use onMessage().
    ReceiveNoWait() checks if something is in the queue at that very moment, so if nothing is there (yet), the main thread continues.
    Hope this helps,
    Lonneke

  • Having problems receiving messages from queue

    Hi,
    I have one machine simply sending messages to a message queue on another machine. I know that the messages are arriving at the destination queue because I can use a modified version of the SimpleSyncConsumer program from the j2ee tutorial to receive the message with no troubles.
    On the destination machine, I also have deployed a web servlet that is trying to do the exact same thing as the SimpleSyncConsumer, connecting to the same connection factory and same destination resource, yet it cannot receive (non-block) the message. It's almost as if it has connected to the wrong queue. There doesn't seem to be any indication of errors prior to the attempt to receive. The connection factory, connection session, consumer, all look fine.
    Does anyone know why I'm getting this problem?
    Thank you very much

    Thanks to strachaj and pazhanikanthan for your replies.
    I'd also like to emphasize the small (not servlet) application I made that is just like the SimpleSyncConsumer program which uses the same code I used inthe servlet, to connect to the servlet's queue and that it is able to receive the message.
    Is there some configuration that needs to be done on the servlet war file using the deploytool to enable it to properly receive the message? I noticed the other examples in the tutorial made use of MDB's which required some extensive configuration (that dealt with queues) from the deploytool. I did not use any MDB's as I didn't think it was necessary judging from how the SimpleSyncConsumer connected to the queue. Am I mistaken?
    Thanks again!

  • Problem receiving message through Messaging Bridge

              Hi!
              I am using WLS7.0, and trying to correctly setup two messaging
              bridges: one from a WLJMS_SEND_QUEUE to a MQJMS_SEND_QUEUE and
              one from a MQJMS_RECEIVE_QUEUE to a WLJMS_RECEIVE_QUEUE.
              When sending on the local send queue WLJMS_SEND_QUEUE, the
              messages are being forwarded to the remote send queue
              MQJMS_SEND_QUEUE as expected, but when setting the JMSReplyTo
              field to the local receive queue WLJMS_RECEIVE_QUEUE, no
              message is received.
              Do I really need to set the JMSReplyTo field to the remote
              receive queue? I would like to work only with the local
              queue definitions... if possible.
              Any hint would be greatly appreciated,
              Guillaume Bedard
              

    This is a dark section of the JMS specification. From section 3.12,
              "Note the following exception case when a provider is handling a foreign
              message implementation. If the foreign message implementation contains a
              JMSReplyTo header field that is set to a foreign destination implementation,
              the provider is not required to handle or preserve the value of this header
              field."
              This is to allow wiggle room with respect to serialization and validation of
              foreign destinations. In your scenario you have a WebLogic sender that
              wants a reply on a WebLogic queue. You put a replyTo of the WebLogic queue
              in the message. When that message makes it to MQSeries land and it tries
              to respond using an MQSeries producer to a WebLogic queue, bad things
              happen. There is no way it can work because MQSeries has no way to handle
              WebLogic destinations. In reality the MQSeries application receiving the
              message does not want to send it to the WebLogic queue, but to the MQSeries
              queue that forwards to the WebLogic queue. That means the WebLogic producer
              sends to a WebLogic queue, but puts a replyTo of an MQSeries queue (of
              which it knows nothing about in this scenario), and then receives on the
              WebLogic queue (even though it said to reply to the MQSeries queue).
              Then of course there is the serialization of the foreign destination. You
              could just serialize to bytes, and leave it that way. WebLogic does
              validation of replyTo queues and the like, so it would try to unserialize
              the replyTo destination specified in the message. If this is an MQSeries
              destination, then WebLogic may not have the necessary classes on the server
              to unserialize the replyTo destination.
              _sjz.
              

  • Hi, i am having trouble with my mac mail account, i cannot send or receive any emails because of the server connection problems. Message says it could not be connected to SMTP server. Thanks in advance for your help.

    Hi, i am having trouble with my mac mail account, i cannot send or receive any emails because of the server connection problems. Message says it could not be connected to SMTP server. Thanks in advance for your help.

    Hello Sue,
    I have an iPad 3, iPad Mini and iPhone 5S and they are all sluggish on capitalisation using shift keys. I hope that Apple will solve the problem because it is driving me crazy.
    I find using a Microsoft Surface and Windows 8 phone, which I also have, work as well as all the ios devices before the ios 7 upgrade.
    It has something to do with the length of time that you need to hold the shift key down. The shift key needs to be held longer than the letter key for the capitalisation to work. For some reason, this is a major change in the way we have learnt to touch type on computers. I am having to relearn how to type!
    Michael

  • Problem receiving from sender, showing in SmtpReceive log but not Message Tracking

    Our Exchange 2007 server (SBS2k8 really) has had problems receiving mail from a certain sender the last few weeks.  With the SMTPReceive set to verbose, I can see the mail coming in but it never shows up in the message tracking logs.  
    Looking at similar issues, I thought maybe the content filtering agent might have been grabbing it, so I set up a transport rule to take any mail from this particular domain and set the SCL to 0 as well as bcc a copy of it to myself.  But I just noticed
    another entry in yesterday's smtpreceive log and that didn't do the trick (or forward a copy to me for that matter).
    I'm including some samples from our SMTP log.  I can see that when it works, after the 354 Start mail input line, our server sends a 250 2.6.0 code confirming the message has been queued for delivery, at which point the remote server sends a QUIT and
    we close it.  But when it fails, there's nothing after the 354 line.
    Example of good transmission:
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.636Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,0,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,+,,
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.636Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,1,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,*,SMTPSubmit SMTPAcceptAnySender AcceptRoutingHeaders,Set Session Permissions
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.636Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,2,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,"220 xxx.xxx.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:00:49 -0400",
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.948Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,3,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,<,EHLO other.domain.com,
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.948Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,4,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,250-xxx.xxx.com Hello [50.xxx.xxx.xxx],
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.948Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,5,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,250-SIZE 26091520,
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.948Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,6,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,250-PIPELINING,
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.948Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,7,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,250-DSN,
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.948Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,8,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES,
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.948Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,9,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,250-STARTTLS,
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.948Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,10,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,250-AUTH,
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.948Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,11,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,250-8BITMIME,
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.948Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,12,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,250-BINARYMIME,
    2014-04-23T15:00:49.948Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,13,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,250 CHUNKING,
    2014-04-23T15:00:50.026Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,14,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,<,MAIL FROM:<[email protected]> SIZE=3497,
    2014-04-23T15:00:50.026Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,15,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,*,08D11000FE2BD02F;2014-04-23T15:00:49.620Z;1,receiving message
    2014-04-23T15:00:50.026Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,16,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,250 2.1.0 Sender OK,
    2014-04-23T15:00:50.073Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,17,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,<,RCPT TO:<[email protected]>,
    2014-04-23T15:00:50.291Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,18,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,250 2.1.5 Recipient OK,
    2014-04-23T15:00:50.338Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,19,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,<,DATA,
    2014-04-23T15:00:50.338Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,20,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>,
    2014-04-23T15:00:50.525Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,21,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,250 2.6.0 <[email protected]> Queued mail for delivery,
    2014-04-23T15:00:50.556Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,22,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,<,QUIT,
    2014-04-23T15:00:50.556Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,23,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,>,221 2.0.0 Service closing transmission channel,
    2014-04-23T15:00:50.556Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD02F,24,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:9100,-,,Local
    and an example of the message not being successfully received:
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.236Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,0,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,+,,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.236Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,1,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,*,SMTPSubmit SMTPAcceptAnySender AcceptRoutingHeaders,Set Session Permissions
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.236Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,2,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,"220 xxx.xxx.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service ready at Thu, 24 Apr 2014 07:57:36 -0400",
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.532Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,3,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,<,EHLO other.domain.com,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.532Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,4,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,250-xxx.xxx.com Hello [50.xxx.xxx.xxx],
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.532Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,5,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,250-SIZE 26091520,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.532Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,6,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,250-PIPELINING,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.532Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,7,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,250-DSN,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.532Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,8,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.532Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,9,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,250-STARTTLS,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.532Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,10,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,250-AUTH,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.532Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,11,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,250-8BITMIME,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.532Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,12,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,250-BINARYMIME,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.532Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,13,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,250 CHUNKING,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.579Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,14,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,<,MAIL FROM:<[email protected]> SIZE=3481,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.579Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,15,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,*,08D11000FE2BD40D;2014-04-24T11:57:37.220Z;1,receiving message
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.579Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,16,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,250 2.1.0 Sender OK,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.610Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,17,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,<,RCPT TO:<[email protected]>,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.719Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,18,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,250 2.1.5 Recipient OK,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.750Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,19,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,<,DATA,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.750Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,20,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,>,354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>,
    2014-04-24T11:57:37.875Z,SBS2k8srv\SBS Receive,08D11000FE2BD40D,21,10.0.100.3:25,50.xxx.xxx.xxx:10131,-,,Remote
    Interestingly, we used to receive email from this sender in the past.  When it stopped working, it didn't quite stop working outright - at some point after the deliveries stopped, 2 made it in, but nothing again since then.

    Check the agent logs on the machine. The Exchange anti-spam agents log files are found here:
    C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\TransportRoles\Logs\AgentLog
    If you use Forefront, its agent log files are usually here:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Forefront Protection for Exchange Server\Data\FSEAgentLog
    Other software may have its log files elsewhere.
    --- Rich Matheisen MCSE&I, Exchange MVP

  • Problems with iPhone messaging - received messages showing as sent messages and messages sent to one family member gets received by other family members.

    AT&T family plan - 4 iPhones in use by family members (4s, 4g, and two 3g's).  Weird things happen when we text message:
    1.   Sometimes, received messages look like they are sent messages - and no alert is sounded.   The conversation looks like you are talking to yourself.   Sometimes it happens to both parties in a text conversation, sometimes it only happens to one party.   Deleting the message entirely and starting over from scratch sometimes fixes the problems and sometimes doesn't fix the problem.  Once this phenomenon starts in a conversation it is almost impossible to get it to stop.  
    2.     Sometimes text messages to a specific family member get replicated to other family members as if in a group conversation - but group is turned off.   This happens sporadically but it happens.   Quite embarassing when husband and wife are sending private messages then suddenly the kids see the message on their iPhones!   Can't figure out why this happens or what makes it happen, but happens a lot!!!
    Has anyone had these problems or knows how to fix them?

    Be specific.
    Everyone?  or Every Device?
    If every device, does that mean you can no longer share apps?
    KiltedTim wrote:
    You have configured multiple devices to use the same AppleID for iMessage.
    Don't do that. iMessage is designed to sync messages between all devices configured with the same Apple ID.
    Everyone should have their own Apple ID. They were never designed to be shared.

  • Since updating to iOS7 I am unable to send or receive messages on my iPad. What can I do to solve this problem?

    Since updating my iPad mini I have been unable to send or receive messages. My iPad only wants to recognize contacts with apple products but still won't deliver a message to them. What can I do to solve this problem?

    Try restarting the device first..
    Press and hold the Sleep/Wake button for a few seconds until the red "slide to power off" slider appears, then swipe the slider to power off.
    Then press and hold the Sleep/Wake button until the Apple logo appears.
    If that doesn't help, try here > iOS: Troubleshooting Messages

  • Having trouble trying to install itunes 10.5. Receive message saying 'There is a problem with this installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be found. Please contact product vendor'

    Having trouble trying to install itunes 10.5. Receive message saying 'There is a problem with this installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be found. Please contact product vendor'

    Managed to get the installation sorted. Go to Control Panel, and where you have a list of all installed programs, repair all the Apple/Itunes related programs. Installation worked fine after that. Hopefully it helps you out too!

  • Problem in receiving messages via RFC Sender Adapter

    Hi,
    I have problems in receiving messages from SAP backens systems. Sometimes we are getting all messages sometimes not. Strange.
    We are transfering report-results via asynchronous RFC calls. To avoid big message sizes we split them up in max. 1000 rows blocks.
    Each RFC call on backend side is completed with COMMIT WORK!
    We increased the number of connections in the RFC sender adapter. Then it was better, but the problem still exists! Not so often, but sometimes !?!?!
    I hope everybody can help me. Thanks a lot!
    best regards,
    Hannes

    hi,
    when you don't receive messages what do you see in SM58
    on the r3?
    any errors over there?
    Regards,
    michal
    <a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

  • Using windows 8 - receive message "ipod detected but cannot be identified" when connecting ipod nano 7th gen. Have unisntalled and reinstalled itunes from apple site as advised with no luck. Has anyone else had this problem and resolved it please?

    Using windows 8 - receive message "ipod detected but cannot be identified properly" when connecting ipod nano 7th gen. Have unisntalled and reinstalled itunes from apple site as advised with no luck. Has anyone else had this problem and resolved it please?

    This is how it's displayed: http://i50.tinypic.com/nd7vk7.jpg
    And this is what happens when I click properties and 'search for solutions': http://i47.tinypic.com/2iu3vrc.jpg (the box disappears after that, apparently having done nothing, when I search online for software it informs me my computer already has the best/latest installed)
    I use a Toshiba Satelite L350-170, my Vista is a 32-bit Thankyou!
    Message was edited by: Martha11

  • TS1717 Itunes was working earlier and now I receive message that says "the folder "itunes" is on a locked disk or you not have write permissions for this folder" - what is this and how can I fix the problem?

    Itunes was working earlier and now I receive message that says "the folder "itunes" is on a locked disk or you not have write permissions for this folder" - what is this and how can I fix the problem?

    Hey HaydenJulie,
    Thanks for the question, and welcome to Apple Support Communities.
    The following article provides information on permissions issues with iTunes. The troubleshooting steps included may resolve your issue:
    iTunes: Missing folder or incorrect permissions may prevent authorization
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1277
    Thanks,
    Matt M.

Maybe you are looking for