Production order confirmation from QE51N

Dear Gurus,
My client use the SAP Mill version. We are a textile manufacturing plant. We create production orders to Greige manufacturing. When on greige confirmation production will be recorded using QE51N transaction. If there is a scrap portion they will use QE51n and there is an option where we can record the scrap. Need to clarify two things.
1. How this QE51N works?
2. account determination part & the scrap recording. (We cannot see the scrap portion in the system, or in any location, does it consume the RM?
Waiting for you.....
PubuduS

Dear,
In SAP Scrap means stock will exhaust. Which means stock will not be transferred to any other material or stock will not be generated. So if you want to generate scrap and you know the quantity of scrap it can be maintained as bi product.If you wanna thru QE51N you can post to rework option.If you have material which will be exhaust and no residue of that material will be ther then maintain that as scrap
Scrap
1) Say for example if order qty is 10, Now if we Confirm this order in CO11N
2) in CO11N, in Yield we give as 8 qty & in scrap field we give 2 qty ( scrap )
3) so system assumes that this scrap 2 qty is waste ( it's lost for ever ) as per SAP
By-Product
1) By-Product is a product that is produced in Conjunction with other products
2) in BOM we maintain in Negetive qty
3) so while confirmation By-product will be received Via 531 Movement type
with regards,
Ram

Similar Messages

  • Checks in userexits of production order confirmations from PDC in CO16N

    Hi,
    we are using PDC interface for production order confirmations. This is done by Idoc type PPCC2PRETTICKET01 (time ticket) based on BAPI BAPI_PRODORDCONF_PDC_UPLOAD_TT. Standard confirmations are working well. In case of SAP detected errors the confirmations are registered for error handling in CO16N.
    So far so good but we have some own check logic implemented in confirmation user exit CONFPP04 and BADI WORKORDER_CONFIRM. These checks are working fine whith online confirmations in CO11N but not in background PDC Idoc processing. I checked the function module EXIT_SAPLCORF_104 for exit CONFPP04 but it has got no exception. The call in SAP processing is like this:
          CALL CUSTOMER-FUNCTION '104'
               EXPORTING
                    CAUFVD_IMP    = I_CAUFVD
                    AFVGD_IMP     = I_AFVGD
                    AFRUD_IMP     = E_AFRUD
               IMPORTING
                    AFRUD_EXP     = LS_AFRUD
               EXCEPTIONS
                    ERROR_MESSAGE = 01
                    OTHERS        = 02.
      CASE SY-SUBRC.
        WHEN 0.
        WHEN 1.
          MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO WITH
                  SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4
                  RAISING CONF_DATA_FALSE.
        WHEN 2.
          MESSAGE E174 RAISING CONF_DATA_FALSE.
    How can I throw the exception when there is no exception defined in the function module interface without modification?
    As 2. option I wonder if it is better to implement the check logic in the BADI WORKORDER_CONFIRM Method AT_SAVE. This has got an exception ERROR_WITH_MESSAGE. But I don't know if this will lead to CO16N registration of the confirmation.
    Any hint how I can solve the problem to apply the online checks in CO11N also to PDC interface confirmations with CO16N in error case?

    Hi Michael,
    First, I think that the BAPI that you are looking for is: BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR
    Second,
    I don't think that in the framework of such a forum it can be explained in detail how to use BAPIs; nevertheless, here are some highlights:
    A BAPI is an executable piece of code that can be called from either an external program within SAP (Z program), or called from an external system either via RFC, or as a web service (depends on your NetWeaver  release).
    As such, it has input (import) data that you transfer when you call it, and output (export) data that you recieve when it ended processing.
    More detailed information, documentation, and a description of the import/export parameters, as well as error handling, one can find in SAP by calling transaction BAPI.
    Regards,
    Mario

  • Serial Number. Production Order Confirmation. GR. UD. Sales Delivery

    Hi Gurus,
    Please help on this issue to get any user exits .....
    As part of Serial number management, we have a certain issues on serial number confirmation, goods receipt from production order and quality inspection with UD.
    Master data:
    Finished product material master, Workscheduling view, Serial number profile maintained " ASRN"
    Process flow:
    1) Avalon Specific Serial numbers generation for finished goods through production order release status.
                  (A11206000001)
                                        A  - Avalon
                                        1   - PCB Unit 1
                                        12 - Year 2012
                                        06 - Week
                                        000001 - Running serial number for the week.
    2) Production order confirmation through CO11n transaction.
    3) Production order Goods receipt through MIGO transaction against order.
    4) Quality Inspection with Usage Decision through QA32 transaction.
    5) Goods Issue for Delivery.
    SAP Product Error:
    1) System does not track and control the operation wise confirmed serial numbers during order confirmation.
    2) System does not track and control the finally confirmed serial numbers during order goods receipt.
    3) System does not track and control the last goods receipt qty in Usage Decision.
    4)  For semi finished product, if we maintain serial number profile in workscheduling view, system is not showing goods issue material list in Co11n transaction for the finished goods.
    5) Interfacing the serial number reading scanner with SAP,  is not working without entering material number and serial number manually.
    6) System does not tracking and controlling the last Usage Decision done serial number during Goods issue to Sale order Delivery.
    Regards,
    Santha

    Hi Santha,
    This is a bit vast, but I'll try to address at least some of the issues:
    1- serial number in operation confirmation is not possible, for the reason that serailization is part of stock management, and as WIP in an order, this is not stock yet. Actually you cannot confirm the manufactured material either, and those 2 go together.
    For tracking specificly WIP, there's something called WIP batches; you may look into it to see if you can use it.
    2- during GR system will propose those SNs that you have defined for the order at release or creation.
    3- ?
    4- GI in CO11N is provided only for BACKFLUSHED material components. Serialized materials CANNOT be backflushed.
    5- You can use a barcode reader to read the serial number (instead of keyboard entry) when cursor is on the right field in the respective screen.
    6- ?

  • URGENT: Prob with Production Order Confirmation

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a problem with Production Order Confirmation.
    When I am confirming a Prod Order and if the components present are more than '999', then error is being thrown and Material Document Number is not being created.
    I want to split the records into 500 slots and pass them at a time for the creation of the Production Order so that it doesnt throw me an error while creating a Material Document No.
    While saving the Production Order confirmation order, it should split the records into 500 slots each and then create Material Document No for each slot.
    Can anyone please help me out in this regard, how to solve this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Harish Kalla

    Hi Harish,
    This problem is addressed in OSS Note : 36353
    The Symptom reads like this
    ==========================================================================
    When you post documents using the AC interface (from SD, MM or other applications), items appear in the FI document which are identical in all or in almost all fields.
    This can also cause error message F5 727 ("Maximum number of items in FI reached"). The system issues this error if more than 999 items occur in an FI document.
    ===========================================================================
    This Note is an elaborate one..
    Hence, go through this and ask your FI Consultant to help you in this regard.
    All the best..
    Regards,
    Siva

  • Measuring point update by production order confirmation

    Hi friends,
    I created a prt as equipment and assigned it to the routing. I created a production order and when i confirm the same i am getting following error as:
    Document MeasUnit has a different dimension to the characteristic unit
    Message no. IR071
    Diagnosis
    The measurement unit on creation of the measurement document must have the same dimension as the measurement unit of the characteristic of the measuring point.
    In this case, the measurement unit % does not suit the character unit EA of the measuring point 103.
    System Response
    Processing will not be continued.
    Procedure
    Use the possible entries help.
    Please suggest the solution.

    Hello Sir(s)
    i have gone through entire post for the subject related to measuring point auto update from production order confirmation.  I have tried the same but i dont know what i am missing.
    if i put some value like 1 or 2 and appropriate UOM then only my measuring document is being updated with the same value not with the actual confirmed quantity..  i have already maintained standard formulla in prt view.
    my basic requirement is to get actual value of produced quanity as counter update. means if 20 pieces have been produced and confirmed in co11n, then counter must bhe updated with the value of confirmed quantity.
    please advice what value should i put as usage in routing master to get actuall counter update.
    Will Highly appreciate your quick reply.
    Snapshots
    Regards.
    Mohammad.

  • Production order confirmation problems

    My production facility has been having problems for years centered around the production order confirmation process.  My colleagues and I are considering submitting an OSS note to SAP, but figured that we should present our problems in these forums before making that next step.
    Here are some individual issues which I believe may be related.  All of these issues occur off and on at random.  They will typically occur when more users are working in the SAP system or when SAP is running slow.
    - When an order is confirmed and a label is printed, sometimes the quantity on the label will be incorrect.  Sometimes no label will print out at all.  When the order is unconfirmed and then reconfirmed again, a label prints out with the correct quantity.
    - When a confirmation is unconfirmed, the unconfirmation will not backflush the associated materials correctly.  Sometimes this error will appear in CO1P for us to re-confirm, but not always.
    - Sometimes confirmations will only backflush certain materials and not ALL the components within the production order.  When the confirmation is unconfirmed and then reconfirmed again, the confirmation will backflush all materials correctly.
    These problems occur at random intervals and never present the user with an error.  Close to 100% of the time all the confirmation issues will be corrected by simply u201Cre-doingu201D the confirmation as we did the first time (no changes in the process).  Only the second time around there will not be any issues.  This leads me to believe there is some internal issue with SAP, perhaps involving which tables CO11N pulls from when a confirmation is made.
    Any and all help is appreciated.  We currently run the AFS version of SAP.  This is my last stop before submitting an OSS note.

    Hi,
    I have not worked on AFS, so consider the below as a pointer which might help:
    When you post confirmations & notice that the components are not being backflushed, check in COGI it could be that there are some incorrect goods movement. You will be required to clear these entries from COGI.
    I suspect that you notice these because, the confirmations are being posted even before the stock for the same has been received & hence the issue with labels as well.
    Do a check on the above, if it resolves the issue, then i would suggest re-design the process to ensure you do not have COGI or COFC entries.
    Also do a search in OSS for AFS specific notes on confirmation.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • Total Production Order Confirmation..Urgent

    Hi
    Can anyone tell me where to find the total production order confirmation by Second ( or minutes or hours ) for any month i.e. say for example March 2007  
    Please suggest......Its urgent
    Rgds

    Hi Vichy,
    Try this,  COOIS,
    List =confirmation
    Profile =std profile
    selection -> sys status =CNF
    Resrict ther report with Dates with Order header level.
    To get activity values use change layout option inside the report.
    Select the field  like unit/activity. from change lay out menu.
    Pradeep
    Edited by: Pradeep Kumar on Apr 18, 2008 9:19 AM

  • Goods movement tab in production order confirmation

    Hi Gurus, please suggest me with the solution for my requirement.
    while performing production order confirmation, some user should be restricted to see goods movements and some can. how is can me done?
    Thanks in advance.

    Dear,
    Please refer my reply from this link,
    [CO15/CO11N  Goods Movement Screen Hide or Non-editable  |CO15/CO11N quantity column should be non editable in Goods Movement Screen]
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Extensionin parameter in the Production Order Confirmation BAPI

    Hi All,
    I am looking for a Production Order Confirmation BAPI which has the Extensionin parameter to append values for custom fields in table AFRU.
    But i could not find one with the Extensionin parameter.
    Please let me know if there is any option or any other Production Order Confirmation BAPI which can meet this requirement.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Jaffer Ali.S

    First off, thanks for these posts.  Worked for me, too.
    Let me just add a little more clarification:
    1) First you call BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GET_HDR_PROP
    2) Then you must update the field ENTRY_QNT from the internal table you pass in to "goodsmovements" because function BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GET_HDR_PROP wipes that field out and you will miss the posting without this filled
    3) Then you call BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR with the same internal table you got back from the first function inclusive of you putting back ENTRY_QNT.
    4) Commit work and wait.
    So, in summary, the first fm is needed and the first fm changes some fields in the "goodsmovements" internal table that you really need to get the posting to work in the second fm.
    And one more thing, the exact function that an earlier posted referenced to find out that both of the functions in this note were called together is:  PP_CATT_CONFBAPI_HDR.
    Message was edited by:
            Kenneth Goldstein

  • Using employee in production order confirmation

    Dear All,
    I want to use employee number registration in production, order confirmation.
    What transaction I must to use?
    I checked PA40, but I don't need to implement HR module, and there are many other informations that I dont't use in PP.
    I need for a name, surname, employee number, date for beginning, date for ending.
    Can somebody tell me an easy way to do this?
    Thank you very much!
    Regards,
    Marian

    Hi
    Go to PA40 enter the Personnel no. XXXX , From date and click manual hire then execute. Then enter the Personnel area, Employee group and Employee subgroup and save then you will get create personal data screen in that you enter name, surname, employee number, date for beginning, date for ending then SAVE.
    If you follow the above procedure you can get the personnel number in confirmation screen.
    Prerequisites:
    You need to create in SPRO
    1. Personnel area
    2. Employee group
    3. Employee subgroup
    Thanks
    S.Murali

  • GR qty showing less than production order confirmation qty

    Hello Experts,
    Greetings.
    My issue is while doing production order confirmation(CO12),for some materials it shows less GR quantity than the confirmation qty.I m wondering how it can be possible?
    What could be the problem?
    Plz advice.
    Thanks
    Nitin

    Confirmed qty of each operation and delivery qty at the header are two different fields.   Confirmed qty will be the same with the yield to conf. during confirmation.  Whereas, the GR qty is equal to the total sum of quantity received from the order. 
    Check whether during confirmation you create auto GR or not.  If yes, then check the COGI t-code.  There might be some error log of goods receipt in there.  If no, then check GR qty in document goods movement compared to confirmed qty during confirmation.
    Hope it helps.

  • Production order confirmations to BW

    Hi,
    Does anybody know if it is possible to take production order CONFIRMATIONS (Fertigungsauftrags Daten auf Ebene Rückmeldungen) to BW via standard routines? In LBWE (with 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL, ...) it does not work.
    Would appreciate any idea ...
    Thank's Markus

    i don't think we are getting that from standard DS. I will tell you our set up. Workcenter will assigned from the Planed Order.
    Comming to your cases... check the DS once again. I will check it out. If you are not getting the values for work center where it is confirmed.
    Create a Generic DS. i can guide to generate a DS and for delta handling.
    1. Create a Generic Extractor for Master Data.
    2. Provide Table Name "AFRU".
    3. save the DS. click on Generic Delta Provide the field "ERSDA" and select the Calender Day. it will pick up the Delta records.
    Any questions let me know. If you reslove this with creating Generic DS please update the thread.
    All the best.
    Regards,
    Nagesh Ganisetti.

  • Cancellation of Production Order confirmation (CO13) not generating TR/TO

    Hi,
    We are facing a typical issue in the PP-WM interface. When we create an order and confirm it (partial confirmation), the Goods movement happens (261 mvt type) as desired and the TO is created and confirmed in the background.
    But, when we try to reverse the movement type (cancelling the production order confirmation using CO13) then there are no TRs or TOs generated in the background (for movement type 262).
    When I manually try to post a material document for 262 movement type, it creates a TO in the background (as per the configurations that I maintained) but this does not happen when movement type 262 is called using PP interface.
    The movement type configurations are all done for Automatic TR and TO generations - this works with normal IM process (when we manually post using MB1A transaction) but not with the return Goods movement happening with PP.....here, the material comes back to the interim storage type 914. We then need to create a TO manually and confirm it to take the stock back in to the original storage type and bin.
    We want that when a process order confirmation is cancelled then the materials should be posted back in to the original storage type and bin (from where the material was issued against the order).
    For Info: COGI shows no errors during the 262 movements, also, material document is generated for 262 movement type but no TR/TO generated.
    Is there any configuration that we have missed?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Shankar

    Hi,
    Yes, you are correct in the understanding that the system creates quants in 914 when the production order confirmation is cancelled. But, it does not generate any TR or TO in the background to post the stock back into the original storage type.
    Can we not use the put away strategies so that the system determines where to place the material? My query is that despite all the configurations for automatic TO creation and confirmation for movement type 262, it does not generate a TO (or TR) in the background when a production order confirmation is cancelled using CO13.
    However, if I manually post a material using MB1A for 261 movement type and reverse it using 262, it generates a TO and confirms it as per the setting in configuration.
    The same thing does not work when we run it through PP (CO11N and then CO13).
    Any suggestions on how to approach this and where to check for missing configurations?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Gaurishankar

  • Mass change of Production Orders status from TECO to CLSD

    Hi All,
    I want to do mass change of Production Orders status from TECO to CLSD. could you tell me is there any t-code by which i can mass change Production orders status from TECO to CLSD. I want Production Orders to be closed, so that further confirmation shouldn't be done for these Production Orders. please let me know the solution.
    Regards,
    Ram

    Hi Girish/Dogboy,
    I can set the status 'Complete' if Order is fully confirmed/fully delivered. When ever i run COHV for partially confirmed/delivered Orders, i get error log saying 'Balance of ORD................ is not zero'. Actually we have lot of Production Orders, where there may be Production Orders released only, partially confirmed etc. so i want them to be closed once for all.
    Regards,
    Ram

  • Production order creation from sales order

    Hi PP Gurus,
    I am creating a production order automatically from sales order by using strategy group exactly similar to 82. Once i create the sales order , its showing missing parts error in prouction order and if i check missing parts overview,it says over all confirmation date is not determine.We have stock in MMBE for that material and storage location combination.
    I have also chekced the requierement class and type and found ok.
    Please help me resolving this issue.
    Thanks in advance.!
    Regards,
    Sudheer

    Hi Mario,
    Yes, the availability check will check other stock types also. My concern is why the availability check is  failing and giving missing parts even if the components are there in stock after considering the reservations.
    I checked OPJJ setting, availability check is active and we did that.
    Can you please help me in this as we are stuck up at this point.
    Regards,
    sudheer

Maybe you are looking for