Project System - Goods Issue

Dear all,
We procure materials against a Project "A" and then we issue same materials to different projects "B", "C"....and so on against reservation.
At a same time, we want to take care (a) Cost planned (b) Budget and Released (c) Project released and PR generated and (d)  Release of PO and GRN for Project "A"
We will create different Projects "B", "C" for different plants.Here, we want to (a) Cost planned (b) Budgeted and released and (c) Project released and reservations created for items.
Is it possible to Goods Issues against different project order? If so, how to map this requirement (i.e. to make Goods Issue to different Projects "B", "C" ) gainst reservations from Project A.
Regards,
Muralidhara

Hi Murali
                  Goods issue, Transfer Posting and GR in PS can be controlled by following mvt type
Goods Issue
1. Consumption for project from project. (221 / 222) Q
2. Consumption for sales order from un-restricted project stock (231 / 232) Q
3. Consumption for order from un-restricted project stock (261 / 262) Q
4. Consumption for network from un-restricted project stock (281 / 282) Q
5. Withdrawal for sampling from QI project stock (331 / 332) Q
6. Withdrawal for sampling from un-restricted project stock (333 / 334) Q
7. Withdrawal for sampling from blocked project stock (335 / 336) Q
8. Withdrawal for sampling from un-restricted project stock (551 / 552) Q
9. Withdrawal for sampling from QI project stock (553 / 554) Q
10. Withdrawal for sampling from blocked project stock (555 / 556) Q
Transfer Posting
1. Transfer posting storage location (one step) - project (311 / 312) Q
2. Transfer posting QI project to un-restricted project stock (321 / 322) Q
3. Transfer posting blocked project to un-restricted project stock (343 / 344) Q
4. Transfer posting blocked project to QI project (349 / 350) Q
5. Transfer posting project to own (411 / 412) Q
GR
1. Goods receipt with reference to a purchase order. (101 / 102) Q
2. Goods receipt for purchase order into GR blocked stock (103 / 104) Q
3. Release GR blocked stock for warehouse (105 / 106) Q
4. Return delivery to vendor (122 / 123) Q
5. Receipt without purchase order into unrestricted stock (501 / 502) Q
6. Receipt without purchase order into QI project stock (503 / 504) Q
7. Receipt without purchase order into blocked stock (505 / 506) Q
8. Receipt without production order into unrestricted stock  (521 / 522) Q
9. Receipt without production order into QI project stock (523 / 524) Q
10. Receipt without production order into blocked stock (525 / 526) Q
P.S: Check transaction  0PEG01 for customizing accordingly
<b> REWARD POINTS IF USEFULL
Thanks and Kind Regards
Mohan

Similar Messages

  • Goods issue against project resevation

    hi all
    one reservation created background in project system ,while issuing(migo mov type =281 q)  using that reservation one error msg is comming
    Document 0000000008   does not contain any selectable items
    regards
    vijay

    Display this reservation and take the order number and check the order status in CO03, if the status is closed u cant issue for the reservation i.e. the status will be like this CLSD MSPT PRC  CSER SETC
    Thanx & Reg
    Anil Malhotra

  • Regarding Goods Reversal & Goods Issue Process for PO

    Hi Experts,
               Could you any one tel me what is Goods Reversal and Goods Issue process for PO...
    How to create the FM & detailed Procedure Pls?....
    Please any one tel me.......
    Thanks & Reagards
    HB

    Hi Hans,
    SOURCE : HELP.SAP
    Purpose
    Inventory Management uses this process in such a way that the goods issue posting is divided into two parts that run in separate systems. Posting the GI document in the supplying plant results in a message to the receiving plant. The receiving plant then performs a complementary posting. The physical goods receipt takes place as usual.
    Prerequisites
    When using batch processing, the following prerequisites must be fulfilled:
    Both the original and target systems have the same batch definition level.
    The batch definition level is either the material or the client.
    An ALE scenario exists for materials and classes (characteristics).
    Unique batch numbers exist cross-system.
    Batches can only be changed in their original system when they are not decoupled. From an organizational point of view, this must also lead to the batch status being changeable in a local SAP R/3 system. For example, this is impossible when transfer posting to a new batch and results in further actions, for example, relabeling containers, palettes and so on.
    Characteristics
    As for the purchase order in a one-system situation, the system should automatically post the material into the stock in transit at the receiving profit center and the corresponding Profit Center Accounting using intra-CC transfer prices at goods issue for the purchase order and the unchecked delivery. This requirement is valid for one-system situations as well as for two-system situations where there is an ALE interface. No internal billing document should be created.
    In a two-system case, the receiving profit center should be derived at goods issue from the unchecked delivery. Profit Center Accounting then takes place with
    Stock change transfer price to stock
    Internal expense to internal sales
    Internal clearing account to stock change transfer price.
    Account determination in a purchase order for an intra-company-code transaction must be different from account determination in external transactions. Automatic GR/IR account clearing is required in both one-system and two-system situations.
    The stock in transit must be visible in the receiving profit center.
    The system must send a shipping notification at goods issue in one-system and two-system situations.
    You need to create an invoice document for the internal and external trading statistics for cross-boundary deliveries as well as for customs purposes.
    GR/GI slips are created.
    Process Flow
    Goods Issue Posting for Stock Transfers
    The delivery triggers the goods issue in the issuing system.
    The call contains the stock transport order data known in the delivery, including the PO item and the logical system of the recipient.
    The transaction (quantity and value updates) is selected using the movement type:
    Movement Type     
    Function
    641     
    Goods issue with UB logic (Creation of stock in transit at recipient, immediate value posting).
    647     
    As 641, however the goods receipt line (movement type 101) is added automatically, so that the goods receipt is posted at the same time as the goods issue (one-step procedure).
    You determine the movement type according to the schedule line category in Sales and Distribution. The goods issue for a cross-system stock transfer must be different from the integrated transaction. This is achieved by adding a new movement type.
    You post quantities and values at goods issue in the same way as a goods issue for a sales order. That is to say, the quantity is posted in the supplying plant and the value is adjusted to that of the stock account. The offsetting posting is made to a clearing account. The known data from the delivery is copied to Accounting to balance the account where necessary.
    The system creates a message to the appropriate receiving system for all items with reference to a cross-system purchase order. The system does not perform any validity checks on the recipient’s data before posting begins. Incorrect Customizing results in the update being terminated.
    If a goods issue has receiving plants in different logical systems, an IDoc is sent for each system.
    In order that the goods receipt is able to use the values on the receiver side, you must add the values used to post the goods movement, in particular the transfer prices, to the IDoc.
    The logic for recognizing the profit center switch functions as follows: At goods issue, the system recognizes that the profit center of the issuing plant is different from the profit center of the receiving plant. The system derives the profit center node from the relevant profit center.
    Data Transfer
    The IDocs sent by the issuing plant trigger the goods issue postings in the receiving plant.
    Background Posting in the Receiving System
    The goods receipt is posted in the receiving system using the IDoc. The interface receives the data from the goods issue in the supplying plant. The following processes now run at the recipient:
    The system finds the update control for the GR part of the posting.
    The goods movement is posted with the new movement type.
    During valuation of the goods receipt, the system might, where necessary (UB logic), refer to the values (legal value and the value from the parallel valuation type, if you are using the transfer price function) from the IDoc.
    The PO history is updated. The PO history is updated with the material document number from the second part of the GI posting. The GI document number is not stored in the supplying plant, because there is no way to display this document.
    In two-step procedures the goods receipt is posted to the stock in transit.
    Reversal
    You can only reverse this goods issue for the PO using the cancellation transaction in SD. You cannot reverse the GI in Inventory Management.
    The material document that is automatically created in the receiving system cannot be canceled. This reversal is triggered by the sending system (the actual reversal of the GI document takes place there) and transmits the data, including the reversal movement type, to the receiving system. No actual reversal is posted in the receiving system, because the material document number of the original document does not exist in this system. This scenario is applicable for cases where you use the two-step procedure (with stock in transit).
    Distribution of Batch Master Data and Characteristics
    The batch information is transported using the message category BATMAS.
    When you create a cross-system goods issue, the system creates the corresponding IDoc using the message category BATMAS.
    When the delivery arrives in the target system, the batch and all the information is already present in the system.
    Changes to the batch data are also distributed using the message category BATMAS.
    The batch can be decoupled in the receiving SAP R/3 system. This means that the batch can have a different status in the receiving system than in the original system. By setting an indicator at material level, you decide whether the batch can be decoupled or whether the batch and all its attributes are copied from the original system. "Decoupled" i.e. "locally independent" batches are no longer distributed from its own system.
    The batch data does not need to be available before the physical goods receipt takes place. The goods receipt into the stock in transit does not usually refer to the batch unless you are working with batches with assigned active ingredient values.
    If the GI cannot be posted for organizational reasons, for example because the goods cannot be loaded onto a truck until 10pm, then you can post the goods into the GR blocked stock. This stock is also non-batch-specific.
    In cases where the GI IDoc arrives before the batch IDoc, then the GI IDoc can be subsequently posted by a periodically scheduled report (transaction BD87). A program like this exists in the SAP standard system. In Customizing for MM Inventory Management (activity Copy, Change Movement Types), you should make settings to define that manual creation of batches at goods receipt is not allowed.
    Shipping Notification
    The shipping notification is required in the receiving system due to its relevance for MRP. In this way, for example, a change in delivery date determined at goods issue is sent to the receiving system using the shipping notification. The shipping notification can also be used when posting the GR batches.
    Reward if found helpfull,
    Cheers,
    Chaitanya.

  • Goods Issue using RF Devices

    Hi,
    Our client wants to use RF devices to post the goods issue for reservations (movement 261) and reversals of these movements (262). I have checked the RF t codes and I do not see this functionality available.
    Typically client wants to select a reservation from the list (run MB26 on handheld) and then post GI by selecting the reservation.
    Can anybody suggest how to handle this situation using handhelds?
    Thanks,
    -Shekhar

    HI,
    check answer in thread [Goods Issue for Reservation using Bar Code System |Goods Issue for Reservation using Bar Code System;
    Andrzej

  • Goods issue in Project System(SAP-PS)

    While creating the Goods Issue with reference to Goods Receipt from Tcode MIGO, it show the error message " Selected material document does not correspond with action to be executed ". First i created Purchase Request.After this Purchase Order with reference to PR.After this I created GR with reference to PO.But i'm not able to create GI.
    Please suggest  me.

    If you have assigned these materials in the network activity you can create a delivery from CNS0 and do the goods issue.

  • Report for Goods Issued for a Project

    Dear Friends,
                           I want a report for a goods issued for a project.can any body convey the T Code Please...
    Regards,

    use mb51 and select q-special stock and enter wbs no. for which you want to see the details.
    if you have more than one wbs then also you can paste no.s of wbs in mb51
    regards

  • While doing the goods issue system is thruoghing an erro message no VL621

    hi ,
    actually while doing the goods issue we had put a validation if that filed(serial number) is not valid.like AVAILABLE then the system has through to an error message.but after that error message system is throughing an nother error.
    Risk of posting several mat.documents for one delivery->long text
        Message no. VL621
    Diagnosis
        Processing has been terminated because there is the risk that the system
        creates several material documents for this delivery.
    Procedure
        If this message occurs frequently, please note the exact situation and
        procedure as well as error messages and inform the system administrator.
    and we changed that error to warning also still we are getting that error message.
    how to stopthis error message.

    hi actually not for serial number check.
    there is a Z field in serial number master which is used for SIM number.
    that SIM number will be validated with available SIM number from another Z table.
    after this SIM error system is throughing this VL621 error after transaction terminated message.

  • Special stock partner data problem in ERP system during "Post Goods issue"

    Hi all,
    I have a (probably) customizing issue in an ERP 6.0 EhP4 test system which not occurs in the ERP 6.0 test system. There is a difference but no one could tell me, what causes the problem in this scenario:
    I have two customers, C1 and C2. C2 is the special stock partner (SB) of C1.
    I've created a Consignment Fill-up order, then a delivery document based on the order and posted it with "Post Goods Issue". During the update process, a function module (SD_PARTNER_UPDATE) receives partner data in an internal table which contains the sold-to, ship-to and special partner data.
    When we tried the same process in the ERP 6.0 EhP4 test system then special-partner data did not occur in the parameter table (I've used the same customers and materials). The special stock partner is probably not taken into consideration due to some customizing settings.
    My question is what should I change in the customization to run the process the same way as in the ERP 6.0 system? As far as I know there are no new modifications which have effect on this area, and the used test customers and materials are almost the same - there are no noticable differences.
    Thanks in advance.
    Akos

    I tried setting that field in the sale order this morning.  By defaulting it to "C"; I was able to get warning message for TAE line.  I was able to post goods with TAE and TAQ, being different quantities.  I need the check to determine if TAE and TAQ delivery quantity are different.  Using this fields seems to be line specific.  Thanks for the suggestion.  I now know what that field does to the delivery.
    I rewarded points.
    Thanks,
    Tony

  • Project System - Report Painter - Cost roll up issue

    Hi,
    We have an issue with the roll up of the costs in Report Painter report in Project Systems. The problem occurs only with those costs which have been settled to an internal order from a WBS element.
    We are using the same cost elements to settle to the Cost Center and Internal order and roll up of the costs work fine for those settled to cost center. But the roll up does not happen for the costs settled to an internal order. Would appreciate if someone can guide on how to fix this issue.
    Raj.

    Here are the values:
    Period/year     000.1900     Remainder 1900     PERIO     Period/year
    Value Type     4     Actual                                                 
    Value Type     10     Statistical Plan                                                 
    Object ind.     P     Project item                                                 
    Object ind.     1     Order plan values: appended, apportioned     9     Order values: not appended, deleted
    Debit type     1     Costs and credit-side payments                                                       
    Thanks for your help.
    Raj/

  • Asset settlement issue from Project System

    Hello everyone,
    In SAP, we have tied Project System and Fixed Asset in the sense that for each network/activity in PS we create and link an asset in Asset Accounting. In the Purchase Order, the network/activity number is assigned and all the transactions that occur through this PO (including down payment, its clearing, GR/IR)  are then settled on the specified asset when we execute settlement run at month end through CJ88.
    However, we have encountered scenarios where an asset was not timely allocated to the network/activity but the transactions were carried out through the PO. When the settlement run was executed, its impact was not visible in Asset Accounting. Later, it was realized and the asset was created and assigned. Once the asset was assigned, all the subsequent transactions through the PO were then being settled successfully. But the problem is with those transactions for which the asset number was initially not assigned.
    Is there any program that can be executed to include the impact of the previous transactions. Otherwise, suggest alternatives.
    Thanks

    Hi Thanks for your reply, But that is not relevent to this issue.
    The issue here is -
    First 2 documents has value date of 4th period and the amount is 8800
    Next document has value date of 5th period and the amount is 1200
    Now i am trying to settle 10000(8800+1200) with 5th period date. Its givign an error Settlement amount is greater than Available amount
    Will it solve if i settle 4th period with 8800 first and then 1200 with 5t period? or any other process?
    Thanks
    Yadayya

  • Goods Issue to a Project

    Hello Guys,
    I have some standard stock which I am posting to a project under a WBSE line, I can see it coming out on MMBE but cannot see where this equipment is allocated.
    I could track the material movements using the Material Documents, but I was looking to have a report that tells me how many items have I allocated under that WBSE line.
    Does anyone would know a way to report this?
    Carlos Araes

    Hello Guys
    Thanks fot the reply!!! BUT what I am looking for it is some type of trasanction that would give me a report of how many equipmentes have I under the WBSE line which I had used when Goods Issuing.
    Reporting the Material Documents give me a track on what I had issued out but not the balance of the stock on the WBSE.
    Would any one know a way to do that?
    thanks

  • Version 999 Project System Plan Data Issue

    I am using transaction CJ9B to copy the Project System related plan data i.e. plan data at the WBS element level from Version 10F, period 1 to 12  in year 2010 to version 999, period 1 to 12 in year 2010. The transaction CJ9B runs successfully in the update mode. But when report CJI4 is executed for version 999, period 1 to 12 in year 2010 then we do not find plan data in sync with version 10F.
    I analysed this issue, had a meeting with end user and blanked out target version 999 using source version 9ZR for the year 2010. Then I again copied version 999 from version 10F. Still plan data in version 999 do not exist as they are in version 10F. I have checked the version 999 master data in transaction OKEV. Integrated Planning for SPL, COPA, cost center accounting and business process is active. COPY Allowed is also enabled. Version 999 is unlocked as well.
    Hence I am not sure why the copy functionality is not working fine for version 999, period 1 to 12 in year 2010.
    Can you please take a look and revert with your opinion so that this issue can be fixed ?
    Thanks,
    Umesh

    Hi,
    If you want to copy all the plan date from 10F to 999, then in Txn CJ9B
    select the indicator reset and overwrite in target version and execute in test mode.
    Regards,

  • Goods Issue for Project and Cost Center from consignmnet

    I am issue goods directly from consignment stock to Cost Center and Project using movement type 201 K and 221K.
    Business has a requirement and they like to know how much goods issued to specific cost center or project. Is there any way in SAP I can look into this?
    Thanks
    Kawal

    Charlie,
    This option doesn't give me the information by project or cost center.
    Option which I can see goes to table MSEG set different search criteria. Problem with this user has to enter lot of information.
    Thanks
    Kawal

  • Exception in CRM system after creating post goods issue in ECC

    Hi Folks,
    We are facing an issue in CRM system. I will tell the scenario in details so that it would be helpful to understand,
    We are creating sales order in CRM system and it got replicated to ECC correctly. We have maintained action definition to trigger email to the customer.
    Then we will be creating delivery and then post goods issue(PGI) for items replicated to ECC systems. After PGI system will update the status in CRM sales order and here configured an action definition to trigger an email to customer.
    We have created custom badi implementations for action definition execute badi to send email. Emails are triggering correctly but after PGI creation while replicating the changes from ECC to CRM we are getting an exception in standard code because PPFTTRIGG table does not have entry. We have failed entry in CRM inbound queue and then did some debug and come to know the place of issue. Help me out with some inputs here.
    Best Regards,
    Dharmakasi.

    Hi,
    I have identified one thing here, if the action definition does not have start condition system is not updating that entry in PPFTTRIGG table. Here i got 2 questions my mind
    1. Why system is not updating the table with all the action definitions available in action profile
    2. Why system is looking for the entry which was not updated in PPFTTRIGG table?
    I do not understand problem with updating table or with action profile itself. Please give some input here. If we deactivate all the definitions which does not have start condition then there is no error.
    Best Regards,
    Dharmakasi.

  • Block Goods Issue base on Projects if null

    i have this requirement in SP
    Scenario.
    i want to block Goods Issue base on the ff. requirement
    1. if Project is Null it will block adding the Goods Issue if U_Department and U_Section is empty
    2. if Project is not Null i will allow adding the Goods Issue even the U_Department and U_section is null
    base on this requirement i made an SP but it doesn't work.
    --      Make Department Mandatory in Goods Issue
    IF (@object_type = '60') and (@transaction_type IN (N'A', N'U'))
    BEGIN
         IF EXISTS (SELECT T0.Docentry from OIGE T0 Inner Join IGE1 T1 ON T0.Docentry=T1.Docentry where
         T1.DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del and (T1.Project is not null and T0.U_DEPT is null or T0.U_DEPT ='' ) )
         BEGIN
              Select @error = 10, @error_message = N'Department Must be filled-up!'
         END
    END
    --      Make Section Mandatory in Goods Issue
    IF (@object_type = '60') and (@transaction_type IN (N'A', N'U'))
    BEGIN
         IF EXISTS (SELECT T0.Docentry from OIGE T0 Inner Join IGE1 T1 ON T0.Docentry=T1.Docentry where
         T1.DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del and (T1.Project is not null and T0.U_SECT is null or T0.U_SECT =''))
         BEGIN
              SET @error = 10
              SET @error_message = N'Section Must be filled-up!'
         END
    END
    What seems to be wrong w/ my Code?
    Best Regards...
    Fidel

    hi Avelino Fidel try this try this final query ,it will work
    IF (@object_type = '60') and (@transaction_type IN (N'A', N'U'))
    BEGIN
    IF EXISTS (SELECT distinct  T0.Docentry from OIGE T0 Inner Join IGE1 T1 ON T0.Docentry=T1.Docentry where
    T1.DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del and (isnull(T1.Project,'') = '')  or  (isnull(T0.U_DEPT,'') = '' ) )
    BEGIN
    Select @error = 10, @error_message = N'Department Must be filled-up!'
    END
    END
    Edited by: Prasanna s on Aug 29, 2009 10:20 AM

Maybe you are looking for