Prompt is not considered in Report

Hi All,
I am using OBIEE 10.1.3.4.0.
Creating a following report
report coulmns:
week_no sales date location
filter:
location prompted
week_no prompted
date prompted
Prompts:
Week_no
date
location
In my report the date values is not getting considered.When I select the date value it select sales data for all the data present in the table.
Week_no is working fine.
I check the query in the log but the date filed values is not getting considered.
Please suggest.
Thanks

Hi,
Ensure that you are using exactly the same formula (TableName.ColumnName) in both filter and prompt.
Thanks

Similar Messages

Prompts are not working when we call another report from the narrative view

Hi,
In my dashboard i need a table view report which should have scrolling option only for that section.
For this i added a html tag <iframe ........scrolling="yes"> in the narrative view and i added that narrative view in the report.
Now,it works fine in the dashboard.
But when i apply prompts in the dashboard the values are not filtering even though i added the "is prompted" filter condition in the criteria of both narrative view section and the called function.
Any help would be greatly appriciated.
Thanks,
chinna.

Hi,
since you have created an iframe dashboard prompt wont work on that report.Same is the case if you put the report in Embeded content.
One possible workaround is to creaate a dummy report having columns same as that of dashboard prompt.Put all the columns is prmompted in this report
(No need to create dummy report if you already have those columns in some other report,You can use that report also)
Then go to your Iframe report and use "filter based on other request".In this way dashboard prompt will filter dummy report and based on dummy report values your iframe report will also filter.
Thanks
Sandeep

SSRS 2008 R2 Calendar Control not working and report not refreshing on pressing enter in Chrome.

SSRS 2008 R2 Calendar Control not working and report not refreshing on pressing enter in Chrome.

SSRS reports are always best viewed in IE and the report result what you see in IE always will not be same and consistent in thirdy party browswers.
So consider using IE as workaround.
Also please refer:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/2188de10-cff9-4e24-b14f-da5121f1c4a4/ssrs-calender-control-not-visible-in-chorme-on-server?forum=sqlreportingservices
Workaround here:
http://www.rajbandi.net/Fixing-SSRS-Report-Viewer-control-date-picker-in-Google-chrome/
-Vaibhav Chaudhari

Target sost calculation not considered Current cost estimate in KKBC_ORD

Hi All,
We have an case wherein it observed that target cost calculation on SFG is wrong
in KKBC_ORD where system does not considered the current cost estimate.
We have all the necessayry customisation in place for Target cost version 0 for current cost estimate.
Below is detailsed case.
1 Process Order created in Dec 2011
2 Price Released to Mat master on 01.01.2012
3 Goods movement,Operation confirmad Material Issues, FG qty delivered @ std cost 0n 04.01.2012
4 Order Technically completed (TECO)
5 KKS1/KKS2 will be done at month end.
We know that In Process order, after deliver of FG the target cost on FG is not getting calculated,target cost will be updated only after calculating variance. it does
not calculate after delivery of finished goods, On Execution of KKS1/KKS2 variance will be calculated the target cost on FG and will be updated.
In process order (COR3 --> Cost analysis) Target cost ,Actual cost and Planned cost are calculated based on the following:
Total Plan Cost = Std Cost the material required to Produce X Planned Qty of the required material
Target Cost = Std Cost the material planned to Produce X Std Qty of material required to produce, for Produced Actual Qty
Actual Cost = Std Cost the material planned to Produce X Actual Qty of material consumed, for Produced Actual Qty
The variance is calculated on SFG and assemblies based on the difference between actual and target cost in KKBC_ORD. During creation of process order, the plan cost
will be updated with the valid standard cost upon the creation.
The target cost on SFG and Assemblies is only generated when there is good receipt from production order into inventory.
The target cost is generated using the valid / recent costing run for the correspondence SFG in KKBc_ORD.
All other target costs showed in COR3 (Menu Go to > Costs > Analysis) or KKBC_ORD before doing KKS1/2 is only statistical- However in our case Traget cost calculated
on SFG in KKBC_ORD not relevant with current cost estimate.
However Actual cost and Planned cost Calculated correctly.
Actual Cost= Current Standard costof the materilal(5.624,88)X Actual Qty (13.693)=77.021,48
Planned cost= Std Cost the material required to Produce (6.572,12) X Planned Qty (12.415)= 81.592,87
However Target cost is not considering the current cost estimate;It should be - Current Standard cost of the materilal(5.624,88)X Target Qty(13.958,124)=78512.07.
But Errorneously Target cost is showing 67.383,59 which causing unfavorable variance to standard.
It should be 78512.07-77.021,48= 1490.59 favourable var to standard in KKBC_ORD.
Any help,suggestion and input would be highly appreciated.
Thanks with Regards
Subrata

hi
target cost is your standard cost* actual confirmed quantity, not the standard quantity required
the variance calculated will be always the actual debit to the production order- actual credit of the production order
your actual credit for the process order is std cost* actual quantity delivered to the inventory= Current Standard costof the materilal(5.624,88)X Actual Qty (13.693)=77.021,48
actual debit to the process order is total actual cost which you can see in COR3 report .
By the way for which period you have calculated variance, target cost will be calculated based on that months standard cost
krishna

Cascading prompts are not working after UNX conversion.

Hi,
We have converted universe to UNX format, but after conversion the cascading prompts are not working. Following is the one of the example of the cascading prompt which is having issue:
We have cascading object named u201CGroup - Deviceu201D as below:
CONCAT(CONCAT(@select(Performance Management\Group\Group Name),' - '),@select(Performance Management\Device\Device Name))
In the SQL Assistance windows, validate button properly validates this object.
Based on the above object, we have filter named u201CEnter/Select Group u2013 Deviceu201D with following definition:
@select(Performance Management\Performance Reporting Objects\Performance Custom Dimensions\Group - Device) In @prompt('Enter/Select Device Names','A','Performance Management\Performance Reporting Objects\Performance Custom Dimensions\Group - Device',Multi,Free,Not_Persistent)
When I click on the validate button for this filter, it doesnu2019t says whether the expression invalid or valid. It does not return anything. I checked the error log windows of IDT and it shows below error once we validate the above filter:
Message: Unhandled event loop exception
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
     at java.util.AbstractList$Itr.checkForComodification(AbstractList.java:372)
     at java.util.AbstractList$Itr.next(AbstractList.java:343)
     at com.businessobjects.semanticlayer.qt.internal.ParseExpressionServiceImpl.getScriptWithAnswers(ParseExpressionServiceImpl.java:753)
     at com.businessobjects.semanticlayer.qt.internal.ParseExpressionServiceImpl.getGeneratedScript(ParseExpressionServiceImpl.java:695)
     at com.businessobjects.semanticlayer.qt.internal.ParseExpressionServiceImpl.getGeneratedScript(ParseExpressionServiceImpl.java:673)
     at com.businessobjects.semanticlayer.qt.internal.ParseExpressionServiceImpl.getObjectSQLCombinations(ParseExpressionServiceImpl.java:369)
     at com.businessobjects.semanticlayer.qt.internal.ParseExpressionServiceImpl.getWhereParseSQL(ParseExpressionServiceImpl.java:298)
     at com.businessobjects.bimodeler.universe.panes.properties.ExpressionParserSQLBindings.parseExpression(ExpressionParserSQLBindings.java:58)
     at com.businessobjects.bimodeler.shared.dialogs.expression.ExpressionEditorComposite$7.widgetSelected(ExpressionEditorComposite.java:330)
This problem is for all the cascading prompts, and only single level prompts are working after conversion to UNX.
Can anyone please help on this? Am I missing any manual changes which are mandatory after UNX conversion for this to work.
Thanks,
Nilesh

Hi Henry,
Thanks for your reply. Yes I have raised SAP ticket for this.
We are at BI 4.0 SP2 Patch 12.
This problem is for all the cascading prompts which created using objects which are having u201CLOV based on Query Panelu201D, it doesnu2019t return the results, when I edit the LOV > edit the query and then click refresh to see the data, the refresh button does not appear.
So I tried creating u201CLOV based on a custom hierarchyu201D as indicated in SAP note u2013 1666504 but it also doesnu2019t work. I used the object (that uses the LOV based on a custom hierarchy) to create the new cascading prompt, when I used this prompt in WEBI report, it only displays prompts for first value and not the second based on first input.
I searched SAP KB and found this note u2013 u201C1620378 - Cascading (nested) prompts are not working for Web Intelligence reports in BI 4u201D which describes bug related to cascading prompts in unv as well as unx. But I am not sure if itu2019s the same which I am getting.
Thanks,
Nilesh

Bug in prompts off of right clicking reports that have actions

Build 22.71, Windows and Linux, going against either Oracle 9i or 10g.
I right click a row in the session report and choose either kill session or trace session, and the window that appears... its first tab selected has the labels for the prompts, but not the information on it, so you do now know what owner's session you are killing or tracing.

FYI -
This is a bug: BUG Reference 5499573

J1INCHLN Create challan not considering some documents

Hi,
J1inchln not considering some documents.
When i checked in fagll03 those documents are not cleared , it still reamin as open items.
In j1inmis report those docments which are not consdered by j1inchln are displaying.
Because of this some price difference is coming. What is the soluton for this.
Please provide the necessary information.
regards,
Haripriya

without updating business place/section and recipient type you can't update internal challan through J1INCHLN, until those documents showing open items.
update the business place/section code through J1INPP
then you can execute J1INCHLN
let me know the status
write validation for business place/section code as required field at the time of document entry for avoiding future mistakes
assign points
Edited by: Sai Krishna Vallurupalli on Jun 26, 2008 11:43 AM

Prevent dashboard prompt from filtering a particular report on page?

I have a dashboard page with 1 prompt and 5 reports. The first object on the dashboard page is a dashboard prompt with a date range for created date.
The request is to filter the first 4 reports based on the dashboard prompt, and then the last report NOT be filtered based on the prompt.
Right now - the date range entered in the dashboard prompt is filtering all 5 reports.
Is there any way to prevent the prompt from filtering a particular report on the dashboard page?
Thanks!

Just wanted to provide an update as to what I learned from the SR I opened.
Dashboard prompts apply to all reports on the page which either:
* Have the "is prompted" filter selected
- OR -
* Are filtered in any other way
In my case, my last report was filtered on the created date to exclude any data prior to July 1, 2010. Because this hardcoded filter was applied, then the report automatically was picking up the date range filter from the dashboard prompt and applying that date range to the report instead.
The workaround was to create a new column on the report formatting the date as YYYYMM and applying a filter to the report as >= 201007. With this, the dashboard prompt is now not applied to filter this report.

Few materials are not considered in MCTE,MCTG

Hi,
i done a report on Daily/monthy Sales and the results are not matching with standard SD sales reports (MCTE,MCTG etc). On analysis i found few materials which are actually billed is not considered by the Standard reports. Those materials belongs to trading materials. What could be the reason.
Suggestions are highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Aswin.

Hi
go to mm03 -> sales org 2 screen -> check if Matl statistics grp is maintained.
thanks

Some material not considered in MCTE

Hi,
i done a report on Daily/monthy Sales and the results are not matching with standard SD sales reports (MCTE,MCTG etc). On analysis i found few materials which are actually billed is not considered by the Standard reports. Those materials belongs to trading materials. What could be the reason.
Suggestions are highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Aswin.

Hi
go to mm03 -> sales org 2 screen -> check if Matl statistics grp is maintained.
thanks

List of emp for whom rebate is not considered in pay roll

hi experts,
can any one help me to get the list of employees for whom rebate is not considered for income tax calculation in pay roll run.
its urgent.
thanks in advance
shiva

As suggested try with wage type reporter identify the wage type for rebate and execute it for all employee so that you will get information for whom it is considered.
Regards
Venkatesh

Unable to see the Default & Mandatory prompts/variable in Web i report

Hi,
We are building web i reports on top of Bex queries, we have some mandatory and optional variables declared in our bex query in filters under default restriction
These default mandatory variables/ prompts are not seen in web i report
Please help us in this concern.
Thanks in Advance,
Swaraj.

Hi swaraj,
Did you create an OSS message for this too? It is good to have these things under close observation.
And which version are you on XI3.1 or BI4.0?
For 3.1, only variables in the filter section (left pane) and are input ready will get generated as prompts in the universe.
You can check this very directly by looking at the generated filters (hidden, mandatory on universe).
For 4.0, When you create a WebI report on the BEx query, the prompts do pop up?
So all ready for input, whether mandatory or optional are visible?
Then you run the query, create your webI report and try to use it and the prompts for the BEx variables are not shown.
If this is the case then you have the problem that the default values are 'saved' on the first execution and cannot be changed later on (because they cannot be purged, WebI just treats the prompt as 'answered' and it will not ask for it again.
Planned to be delivered with patch 2.5 (not available yet) the behavior will be slightly changed, when you purge the data from a WebI document, it will also clear the defaults, thus triggering the prompting again...
Hope this helps,
Marianne

Prompt Does not Appear in Infoview

Hi All,
I have 2 Migrated Reports with prompt from BO version 5.1.2 to BO version XIR2 SP2.
These reports show prompt in Deski but the prompt does not appear when exported to Infoview.
I have disabled the option for u2018associate a list of valuesu2019 in the universe for each field.
Also, These reports work fine in BO 5.x.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi Sheeba,
Following solution might help you to resolve the issue.
Place the prompt for the LOV into the report header and republish the affected report to the XI repository. Once this has been done, the affected report should then refresh the LOV properly and display the correct values again as originally designed.
Regards,
Sarbhjeet Kaur

Online Report Server did not send the report data. (Error: BAW 0059)

Can someone confirm me if we can create an e-mail publication for promt based reports? I was created publications for non-prompt based report and they were successful. But when I create a publiction for an report which has prompt I am gettign the error - Online Report Server did not send the report data. (Error: BAW 0059). Any ideas?
--Nivas

I forgot to mention the envionment, which is 6.5.1

Project stock (WBS element) not consider in QA07 Transaction

Standard SAP transaction QA07 for Deadline monitoring of batches not
considering project stock (WBS element) for the same
Kindly suggest for your possible solutions as we are going to fully equipped with
project system and its stock must be
considered for background scheduler of recurring inspection
Waiting for your kind and immediate action
With Regards,
Kunal Sheth

Hi!
We regret to inform you, that the report RQAAAS10 ( QA07 ) does not
support project stocks.
For better understanding of the transaction QA07, I would ask you kindly
to review the documentation for the report RQAAAS10.
Here are the Requirements for this report:
'The batch master data corresponds to the selection conditions.
Only those batches that full fill the following conditions are examined:
-the batch status is "released".
-the unrestricted-use stock is greater than zero.
-the stock is not in a HU storage location'
This means that all 'special' stock locations, like for example project
stock, will be not relevant for this transaction.
Unfortunately SAP not able to provide a workaround for your
issue, with the exception of a customer own development. In this case
you can copy the report and make the correspondent adjustments needed.
Best regards
Erika

Prompt is not considered in Report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for