Propose Change against a confirmed PO in SUS

SRM Gurus,
We have following requirement in MM-SUS scenario:
1. Buyer submits PO to SUS from ECC.
2. Supplier responds with POR without any changes in qty./date/price and the same is updated in ECC PO(Buyer also confirms the same).
3. Due to delay for some on supplier side, in SUS supplier wants to propose new qty./date for he same cofirmed PO.
I am not able to understand how to handle the step three....
we are using ECC6 and SRM6.0
with regards
Manjunath

Hi,
I am afraid that making changes to the standard , or even developing your Z code for your requirement will be very complicated ..
from the business point of view --> supplier should only confirm --> if he is very certain that he will be able to deliver the goods according to the dates specified..
once the supplier has confirmed --> the supplier can do no changes --> only way out is for the purchaser to make changes and send over again to SUS.
in this case the status of the order in SUS will go from 'confirmed' to ' changed'.., and there it is possible to confirm again..
but in MM --> if you have created follow-on documents ( goods receipt) , then i am not sure wether --> the purchaser will be able to make changes and send over to SUS again..

Similar Messages

  • Proposed changes to Business Model and effects on BW Reporting

    Dear All
    The Business is giving consideration to reducing (consolidating) its current number of Business Areas in use. They are stating they are not sure whether it will just rename some of the current Business Areas or create completely new ones.
    We are trying to establish what issues the proposed changes will produce in our reporting? There are obvious ones, around modelling for example, and we'll need to liaise with our Internal Audit but are there any specific Governance,  Risk Control or Compliance issues around reporting we should be asking the Business to address?
    Does anyone have any thoughts/experiences they want to share whose companies have undertaken something similar?
    Thanks in advance
    Helen

    I will just brain dump some thoughts - they may or may not be applicable
    Business Areas? as in the SAP term Business areas or the generic term
    If this were me - I would start to worry about the statutory requirements as business areas tend to get used for segment reporting under IAS14
    SAP brought out the segment ledgers in ECC6 to get around some of the process problems currently within the profit centre and business area concepts.
    These technical objects previously did not allow up to date balanced balanced sheets for the segments due to the month end SAP process runs required to fill areas of the balance sheet not posted directly by standard SAP transactions. (ie subledger GL to PCA posting runs)
    The new ECC6 segments resolve this by deriving (much like CO-PA derivation rules) the segment portion at posting time - thus the balance sheets balance
    From a reporting process point of view this is a massive tool in the armoury as some aspects of Sox or some countries GAAP compliance require a balance sheet to be available within 14 days of asking (hence the problem with month end processes)
    As with most aspects of BI and BW - the technology is the easy part (no matter what the postings in this forum suggest) - the problem is always the process and legal compliance, as reporting is the end game and only highlights problem with updtream processes.
    From a day to day process - the problems that you may encounter will be the change in processes of default business areas for automated postings (ie some business areas are going to take the hit for, say, write off amounts, unless that is SAP substitution and validation rules are written to allocate the postings correctly)
    What are you going to do with the historical data - are you going to remodel it with new look ups in BW and write the data back intot he cubes? As reloading historical data could take some time
    And then if you do restate the historical data - the internal auditors are not going to be happy as you now have no backup for the original tax/statutory submissions

  • How do i change the Std. confirm key from 'AB' to 'Z1', receiving ACK IDOC.

    Hi,
    How do i change the Std. confirm key from 'AB' to 'Z1', when loading ACK IDOC.
    Thanks

    Hi Jorge,
    Thanks for your help.
    I change the output mode to "Collect IDocs" method, if I use SAP standard function POIM (RCCLMDAT), it will depend on change pointer to generate IDoc, and it includes function: RSEOUT00 ( and MASS_RSEOUT00 ) to collect and send IDoc.
    The collect table is BDCP.
    BR,

  • Order Component quantity gets changed after operation confirmation

    Order Component quantity gets changed after operation confirmation.
    We are using CO27 to issue the Material to the Order.
    When we do the confirmation of  operation. Component quantity attached to operation get changed.
    Any solution for this.

    Dear
    Please Follow the Steps
    1. Go into Co02 there u do production order with qty select the Component overview u find the Materials there please check hhow much is the qty of that particular material
    EX: Production order qty for Header Material is 10 ea
    then ur Compannets Qty is 10 or 20
    depends on the Componet Qty the Operation takes place that is because u have maintatined a base qty in Routing and BOM
    With Regards
    Pushpalas

  • Product allocation check found changes to the confirmation

    Hi friends,
    while creating the sales order after entering the material, i am getting the Error -'product allocation check found changes to the confirmation'.i have checked in MMBE stock is there for the material and because of this the schedule line is not confirmed.
    what could be the possible Answer ? please help me out.
    regards
    santosh

    Hi
    Double Click on the sub-item and goto schedule lines tab and them from menu select Environment and click on Availability.
    See whats the available stcok.
    Regards
    Madhu

  • My password was changed against my will ...

    Hello,
    I had an account. The ID is: [Redacted for privacy]
    While it was opened, I saw that the password was changed against my will.
    I tried to reset it, it did not work out. I knew that the password doesn't even exist, which is bizarre. I have used this acocunt for many years.
    It is clear that someone has hacked it.
    I need to reset it now and then get it back after getting a new protected password.
    How could I proceed?
    Thanks in advance.
    First things, first: for your safety and protection, please never, ever include any personally identifiable information such as your real name, Skype account name, e-mail address, or a telephone number in a post on a public Community or forum such as this. Thanks!
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi, Chafic, and welcome to the Community,
    As ridiculous as this may sound, create a new account so that you can contact Skype Customer Service in order to recover your first account.
    Here is a link to the instruction on how to contact Skype Customer Service via their secure portal: Contact Customer Service
    More details to help you through the process: you will need to proceed through each step, one at a time. Sign on to the Skype website as requested. Choose the subject and topic which most closely matches the item you need assistance with. Then, continue past Step 2 of the instruction where several articles from the FAQ library will appear for you to review, and proceed to Step 3, Continue Support Request (the blue "button" appears at the lower right corner of the website page). You may also skip through Step 4 where you will be referred back here to the Community; no need to do this as the Community is where you started. When you complete the webform and click Submit, your information is relayed to Skype and you will receive a reply via e-mail.
    Regards,
    Elaine
    Was your question answered? Please click on the Accept as a Solution link so everyone can quickly find what works! Like a post or want to say, "Thank You" - ?? Click on the Kudos button!
    Trustworthy information: Brian Krebs: 3 Basic Rules for Online Safety and Consumer Reports: Guide to Internet Security Online Safety Tip: Change your passwords often!

  • Storage bin available when posting change is not confirmed completely

    Dear Gurus, I have a question for you:
    My costumer wants to do a posting change when the material is released from QM with a decision usage from Q to unrestricted use. The process is done in two steps: with LU04 the TO is generated and with LT12 is confirmed. When the TO is generated the position is half confirmed. With LT21 we can see the row for the ST (lets say ST 504 Open Storage type) and a second row 922 TR-ZONE. The first row appears green (as confirmed) and the second row appears red (Not confirmed).
    My costumer says that " beacause of the strategy given for the storage entry, the storage bin released in the TO (not confirmed completely yet)   is available at this moment.
    If the storage bin is still physically full, the carrier will found not space for leaving the goods even SAP is telling him there is space available at this storage bin."
    I have read that once yo start a TO the storage bin is blocked until the transaction is fully confirmed.
    If this is correct I need to demostrate it and I don not find the way to do it.
    I hope you understand my explanation and give me any clue.
    I appreciate very much some help.
    Al

    agmogena wrote:
    Ok, I will tell you the configuration I have. Lets point in a movement 921 quality to unrestricted use.
    > Type Storage origin: 902  EQ and RC flags are set on. (confirmation control for storage type)
    > Type storage TR: 922 are set on.
    >
    > Movement type 921 the flags for Confirm immed and Propose confirm are NOT set.
    >
    > I do a LU01 to create a intruction to change a material from Q to Unrestricted.
    > with LT05 I create the TO.
    > At this time if I look LT21 the TO created I see the tag source with two positions one for TS 902 green color and the second 922 in red.
    > For the tag of target We can see the first position 922 In red and the second position 902 in green color.
    >
    > Perhaps this detailed explanation will help you to fully understand the scenario.
    >
    > Thank you again,
    >
    > Al.
    From the above it isn't entirly clear that the first part of the T.O. is actualy confirmed, my settings are to autoconfirm this so I have no example to look at in my system. Perhaps the display shows the first line green before any actual confirmation..
    I assume the stock status has not changed when you first view the T.O.? If the t.o. is partly confirmed I would expect to see the stock status changed and a neg in 922 until the second part is confirmed. Perhaps there is no confirmation at all yet, in LT21 what is the confirmation status? If you view the transfer order header there would be a partial confirmation showing with a yellow triangle, do you see this or no confirmation indicated at all?

  • GR Proposed Quantity against delivery schedules in PO

    Hi All,
    Is there any configuration setting so that while doing Goods Receipt, the system proposed quantity should be against the different delivery schedules maintained in delivery schedules tab in PO.
    Regards,
    vamshi

    Hi,
    When we send a PO Delivery schedule, its the requiremet which we specify to the vendor but vendor needs to confirm on that, thats why the inboud delivery process is helpful there, because we can't control on baisis of PO what qty is being sent by vendor, delivery schedule is just an info to the vendor, but the ref doc for that is inbound delivery wherein it confirms the vendor is sending a particular qty on a particular date.
    The other option is to use scheduling agreement schedule lines, please look for options in your design.

  • Is it true that I can't change the Registration Confirmation HTML page?

    I am using Connect 8 on Win2000 using Firefox. I am using Adobe's Connect as an Adobe hosted service, currently on a trial but happy to convert the service if I can iron out all difficulties.
    After creating Curriculum, I created an event and set up a number of guests. This is training, not really an event, but it is a series of online modules that the class attendees will need to view before the face-to-face classes started. Most things went well (allowing for user error, of course ;-) ), but when the attendees got their invitations and then went to the registration page, after completing this page, they got an HTML page that said
    "Thank you for your registration request. Your information has been submitted to the event host."
    I can preview this page at "http://meetxxx.adobeconnect.com/e1qrzebyxs7/event/registration_confirm.html"...but I can't change it here.
    I did searches here, and I came up with 2 thoughts: (1) I can buy Adobe Contribute to update that page (which I otherwise would have no use for), or wait until Connect 9 (Q1 2012) where changing this page will be an available feature.
    Is this it? Do I have no way of accessing that page via FTP? I would be more than happy to grab that page, update the text (which is all I want to do), and reload to that folder.
    The problem is that the default message on the page assumes that the administrator is going to have to see the registration in order to approve it...but I have already indicated on the set up that I don't need to approve registrations, but that the email with the link to the online modules can be sent immediately (which happens)...so I want this page to say something like "Thank you for your registration request. You will be sent an email shortly with the link to the online modules."
    Do I really have no alternative to change a message on a page that has clearly inappropriate text for the situation?
    Thanks!
    Bill

    Thanks, but unfortunately, this is not a message, it is the HTML page that it shown after a student registers for a course. I can see how to preview it at
    but I can't edit it here, nor anywhere else I can find...note that I am looking the "Registration Confirmation" link (last one).
    Bill

  • Mass change for field Confirmation control Key in PO / SA

    Dear All,
    There is a need to do mass change in value for field Confirmation control Key in PO / SA. Some of them have PO history. If we have PO history system wont allow to change conf. ctrl key. Also since it is a production system we can not cancel previous po histories. This is in SAP 4.7 where we dont have mass change tcode for Scheduling agreements.
    Can we maintain the values thru table entries. like using se16n maintain entries check box. This option is greyed out. can we activate that & do this requirement.
    please suggest.

    hi Greetings!
    The confirmation control key can not be changed in the scheduling agreement if GR for item had already been posted. If the GRs can be canceled , it is possible to change the confirmation control in the SA item.
    Version 4.7 do not support Mass change of scheduling agreements, hence you have to either create a SCAT or BDC to perform the task.
    Gobinathan G

  • How to prevent action (lead selection change) with popup (confirmation)?

    Hello all,
    I have an application where I want the user to confirm when he selects a new line in a table. When the user selects a new line in the table an other used component reloads its data based on the new line selected. If the user has not pressed the save button before selecting a new line, any changes in the used component will be lost.
    Currently I use onLeadSelect action on the table to call the load_data method(id=xxx) on the used component in order to display data relevant for id=xxx based the new line.
    I can open a popup to confirm from the onLeadSelect-action or the WDDoBeforeAction, but the action still happens; it doesn't wait for the user to respond. And then any changes are lost...
    I may have to store the parameters sent to the onLeadSelect method in context and continue when the button action from the pop-up returns via subscribed method, but I think this is an unelegant way of doing this.
    There must be a better way...? Any ideas?
    Regards,
    Christian Frier

    on the lead select event handler you can show the popup and no other logic. Move your logic to the ok and cancel button handlers of the pop up.

  • WM Putaway (LM03 + Change Bin at confirmation)

    I’m trying to use standard radio frequency transaction for “<u>Putaway by TO</u>” (LM03 *) to change the destination bin for a single-step confirmation TO during confirmation, but I only get “<u>Selection not possible</u>” message. Is there any functional configuration missing? Any SAP Note?
    Steps:
    - Enter LM03;
    - Check Source Information
    - Select Source Information
    - Check Destination Information
    - Choose “<u>F7 NBin</u>” (new bin)
    - Message “<u>Selection not possible</u>”
    *<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/33/607d5c087b11d3b4ac006094b9b121/frameset.htm">Putaway: Selected by Transfer Order</a>
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Raphael

    Please do the below settings.
    In storage type master data Dst bin ch. during confirm = 1
    Warehouse management-Physical Inventory---define types per storage type :in that for that particular storage type un tick all the columns.
    Cancel the TO which you have created and once again create the TO, then at the time of confirmation you can edit the destination bin.
    Regards
    Shakir

  • PO confirmation alerts in SUS portal

    I created PO in R/3 and sent to vendor SUS portal.
    Then vendor didn't confirmed PO so i sent alerts for PO confirmation to vendor.. Now when I am trying to see alerts in SUS portal, its giving error as: "Error in call of back end function for component AlertMonitorComponent: Message type   is unknown., error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE".
    Please guide.

    By PO confirmation I dont mean Goods receipt, but its PO acceptance by vendor.

  • Item level attachments in confirmation sent from SUS in EBP-SUS scenario

    Dear colleagues,
    I am in SRM 5.0
    In an EBP-SUS scenario, I have created a Confirmation for a Purchase Order with an attachment added at header level of confirmation as well as item level of confirmation and sent to EBP.
    The XML that reaches EBP has both the attachments but effectively the confirmation that gets created in EBP has attachment only in header level and the item level attachment is missing.
    Could any of you with your experience let me know whether it is a limitation or is it possible to send attachments in item level to EBP?
    Many thanks.
    Best regards,
    Srivatsa Ganesh V
    SAP Labs

    vatsa,
    if the xml message has both the attachments , then it is a problem.
    please debug the inbound of xml , it is very easy to find out whether both the attachments are considered in the creation of the document.
    use transaction sxi_support and the inbound xml for debugging.

  • Availability check during changing to reconsider confirmed quantity

    Hi there,
    Is it somehow possible during changing the order quantity of an already confirmed item to reconsider the confirmed quantity?
    When decreasing the quantity he sometimes reschedules the item and the the whole confirmed quantity is one month back.
    Regards and thanks,
    Alex

    But I don't want to have a new ATP check.
    Example:
    Yesterday I got 3 pieces of material X confirmed.
    Today my customer only wants 2 and I have to reduce the quantity now. But then a new ATP check runs even if there are enough stocks.

Maybe you are looking for