Purchase Order in ASCP Workbench

Is there any chance not to release the rows that have the order type "Purchase order".
My customer only wants to see this type as "Read Only"
They don't want to release these rows.
Is there any profile that can be set in user level or responsibility level?
Or another solution.
I made a personalization when they click the "For Release" , the pop up warn message comes and warn them as "They can't update this field bla bla..."
Is that another way?
Thanks
Engin

There is no system supported way to suppress PO releases.
I have also used personalization for similar (not same) situation and it works fine.
Sandeep Gandhi

Similar Messages

  • Exclude B2B Purchase Order from ASCP

    Hi,
    I have a requirement to exclude a particular Purchase Order from ASCP. The item is inventory and also MRP planned. I cannot change that.
    this is for the B2B scenario.
    Is it possible to give a subinventory in Purchase Order -> distributions and uncheck the nettable flag in the subinventory. Does this help ASCP to exclude the PO?

    A PO which is created with destination equal to a non-nettable sub -inventory will not be considered in plan.
    Thnx
    Partha.

  • Is qty shipped against Sales Order visible in ASCP workbench?

    Hi
    Is it possible to view qty shipped against Sales Order in ASCP workbench either in collected data or plan output?
    Regards,
    Utkarsh

    Hi Utkarsh
    There are a few scenarios which may happen if there is a shipped qty against a sales order line:
    1. Qty Shipped is within shipping tolerance - Sales order line will be closed and its no more an active demand for planning (assuming inventory/ invoicing interface etc are already run). While this SO line still may be collected in APS, its only used for forecast consumption purposes.
    2. Qty Shipped is outside shipping tolerance - Sales order line will be split automatically with shipped line being closed (with same behavior as above in #1) and new line with balance quantity.
    Thus, planners WB doesn't need to show shipped quantity though I'm interested to learn the business objective for requesting this information in Planner's WB?
    Thanks
    Navneet

  • Purchase Order flow in ASCP

    Hi eveyone.
    Mi question is: after that these next steps complete:
    Description of Data Flow:
    New purchase orders or requisitions in approved status.
    Snapshot does not contain that newly entered purchase order or requisition.
    The MRP_AP_xxxxx_V views do not contain the new purchase order or requisition.
    Internal rdbms trigger populates the newly entered purchase order or requisition RowID into Snapshot Log (MLOG$ objects).
    Launch ASCP Data Collections.
    Refresh Snapshot reads row id from MLOG$.
    Refresh Snapshot gets record from base table using row id.
    Refresh Snapshot populates/updates the snapshot with current table record information.
    As the snapshot is updated, the MRP_SN_xxxxx_T triggers fire.
    The tirggers update/insert into the MRP_AD_SUPPLY table.
    The MRP_AP_xxxxx_V views now have the new purchase order or requisition.
    Planning Data Pull reads the MRP_AP_xxxxx_V views.
    Planning Data Pull validates and calculates the purchase order or requisition data.
    Planning Data Pull pulls data from EBS source instance over the database links:
    ERP-based programs look in mrp_ap_apps_instances_all on the source instance to get the link name to VCP.
    VCP-based programs look in msc_apps_instances planning instances to get the link name to ERP.
    Planning Data Pull inserts that pulled data into the MSC_ST_xxxxx staging tables.
    ODS Load reads the MSC_ST_xxxxx staging tables.
    ODS Load validates and calculates the purchase order or requisition data.
    ODS Load purges existing ODS data and loads new/change records using either the Complete or Net Change methods.
    ODS Load data is hard coded with PLAN_ID = -1 for Collected Raw Source Data.
    ODS data is read by the MBP Memory Based Planner.
    ODS data is read by Production Scheduler.
    ODS data is read by Strategic Network Optimization.
    What append next? The Order tables will be updated? or the information about these order is stored in a new table?.
    Im asking because in need get a update information ot this order, to send a external systema trough a bpel process.
    Thanks for the help and time.
    resource.
    Oracle Value Chain Planning Collections Implementation Guide

    Hi,
    In Cash journal, there are fields which are standard from the program SAPMFCJ0 and Control FTCJ_E_POSTINGS.
    So you can see in FBCJ, while you post transaction line at the extreme right, you can see "configuration" there you can see the available fields. If you want to include, contact ABAP consultant or SAP team.
    Regards,
    Ramesh.

  • Purchase Requsition not shown in ASCP Workbench

    Hi All,
    We created an approved purchase requisition from ASCP one month back with three line items.This requisition is shown in ASCP workbench for 2 lines items as a supply but it is not showing as a supply in workbench for the other 1 item.Are there any item level setups to be checked???
    Your inputs will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Vivek

    Check the whether that item is planning enabled. Org Items -> General Planning/ MRP Planning

  • In ASCP Workbench - Need to take action against sales order types

    Hi Team,
    I am facing one issue, In ASCP workbench, when we query an item with conditions Order type=Sales Order, I can see many rows with Action=Release, Action=None.
    Some rows with Action=None is in pink colour (without taking action against this in ASCP WB) and some in black colour.
    For rows with Action = Release, We can check the Release check box and can modify the "Implement date" field, Save and Release (Tools-->Release). Then we can see the changes in Schedule ship date field in Sales Order line (Source Instance)
    But for Action=None, We can't check the Release check box (But User want to implement New date for this also)
    Since this is linked with OM, I am in a position to solve the issues urgently based on the below questions.
    1. Which one triggers the Action=Release or None
    2. What modification needs to change in SO line (Source instance) to know the changes in Action column in ASCP WB.
    3. User needs to implement new dates for the items having Action=None also. For this how can override or any workaround is there?
    Note: For the items having same Old due dates and
    Please suggest me ASAP.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ramesh

    Dear Ramesh
    Ones in Pink - Your plan is ATP enabled plan. So if there is a new sales order entered in OM module there is a sales order entry made in the ATP table the moment its scheduled in source. But since ASCP has nt been run yet they are still showing actiona s none in the plan.
    W r t one with action release your understanding of ship date updation through ascp release is correct.
    Why does customer want to chnage date on other sales orders (action-none) ? . ASCP has planned and it is saying that such is the date of expected shipment and so action is none. Any business reason why a date change and release is required on action none sales orders? By default behaviour action None cant be released to source .
    Best Regards
    Partha

  • Purchase Order Reconciliation Workbench

    We are running into performance issues while closing POs in the Purchase Order Reconciliation Workbench. If 5+ users kick off the PO_RECON process online, it times out. Anybody out there experience similar issues?
    Any pointers would be appreciated.
    - Nick

    There is no system supported way to suppress PO releases.
    I have also used personalization for similar (not same) situation and it works fine.
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • Work Order not appearing in ASCP workbench

        I have a sales order for 1 unit for an ATO item and a WO for the same item has been created by progressing the SO.
    WO is also marked as FIRM in the Discrete jobs form.
    MRP net quantity on WO is 1.
    SO is past due.
    WO completion date is 14th August 2014
    WO status is UNRELEASED
    Upon the running the unconstrained plan, the sales order appears and a planned order is created.
    Why is the WO not shown in the ASCP workbench?
    Note: Before i marked the WO as firm, it was shown in the workbench and was pegged to the SO. But not after marking it as FIRM in the Discrete jobs form.

    Can you check if your job is present in this view mrp_ap_wip_jobs_v and if not then check the underlying queries filtering job out..
    Also what is the job status, please note that out of all the below statuses only the below bold one are collected.
    Unreleased
    Released
    Complete
    Complete - No Charges
    On Hold
    Cancelled
    Pending Bill Load
    Failed Bill Load
    Pending Routing Load
    Failed Routing Load
    Closed
    Pending - Mass Loaded
    Pending Close
    Failed Close
    Thanks,
    Abhishek Sharma
    Please mark the post correct or helpful, if answered

  • Entering Invoices with Matched Purchase Orders in the Invoice Workbench

    Hi,
    Could someone help me in this question (apologize the bad english).
    In invoice workbench, when im creating a new invoice, at the time that i insert a new line and select a purchase order (in this case, a closed purchase order). The system show an alert that im using a closed purchase, fine. But then the workbench let me continue till i finish the invoice.
    This also happen when the purchase order has no balance.
    Have any setup that i can do to make this process unable to be accomplished?

    needs to be done a setup at payables invoice > tolerances; then set the tolerence created at options > payable options > matching
    Edited by: user8875052 on 13/08/2012 12:15

  • Release of Planned Orders from ASCP to Internal requisition

    Hi All,
    Is there a way to stop creation of ISO from IR which is released from ASCP Workbench?
    As per my knowledge, when we release a Planned Order, it will create an IR and ISO automatically. There is no such functionality like in Purchasing side where we can use ASL to restrict the PO creation process.
    Thanks for your pointers.
    Regards,
    N

    Hi,
    Yes but in that case the responsibility being used to release the planned orders should not have access on any OU.
    Below is the other thread where i gave the solution for requisitions.
    Release from Planner's workbench auto-triggers WIP Mass Load, how do we restrict
    Please let me know if you are interested and we can do it at user levels also if can't implemented at resp level..
    Thanks,
    Abhishek Sharma
    Please mark the post correct or helpful, if answered

  • Mass Reschedule of Purchase Orders - from MRP

    We are using MRP (not ASCP). Is it possible to perform a mass reschedule of purchase orders (note, not purch reqs, but purchase orders), directly from the planner's workbench? I think it is not possible with MRP, but ASCP seems to have the functionality. Am I right? Has anyone got any workarounds or tips on how to mass reschedule given that MRP can't do it?
    Thanks

    You were also correct that ASCP does have that feature. You can reschedule the "need by date" of existing purchase orders from the ASCP planners workbench. You can query purchase orders by specific attributes (like category or supplier) and then adjust the dates and release these changes to purchasing.
    MRP does not have the ability to reschedule existing purchase orders.
    Regards,
    Kevin

  • Can I releases planned orders in planner workbench  using inventory planner responsability (IO)

    Can I releases planned orders in planner workbench using inventory planner responsability (IO), in IO manual I found following information :
    Planner Workbench
    You can use the Planner Workbench in Oracle Advanced Supply Chain Planning to act on recommendations generated by the planning process for a plan. You can implement
    planned orders as discrete jobs or purchase requisitions, maintain planned orders, reschedule scheduled receipts, and implement repetitive schedules. You can choose all
    suggestions from an MRP plan, or only those that meet a certain criteria. In Oracle Inventory Optimization, Planner Workbench is used to perform tasks such as setting up
    item attributes, setting up supply chain BOM, and analyzing time-phased safety stocks.
    my question is Oracle Inventory Optimization, Planner Workbench can´t release planned orders.
    Thanks in advance
    regards James

    Hi James,
    We cannot release planned orders from IO workbench.
    IO is for safety stock planning, not for releasing planned orders. That is done from an ASCP plan which uses the IO plan as demand schedule.
    Regards,
    Mohan Balaji
    NOTE: Please mark the post as Helpful or Answered if the update has really helped you. This would also bring the thread to logical conclusion and will be helpful for the viewers.

  • Error adding Goods Receipt PO based on Purchase Order

    I am working on an add-on that was working against a 2005A version of SAP Business One and I am upgrading it to run against a 2007A Company (PL41)
    I am receiving strange errors when testing the add-on.
    I can add a Purchase order not based on a Goods Receipt PO without any problems but as soon as I specify a base type, entry and line I get either -1 General Error, or the Tried to Read/Write Protected Memory Error.  The error I receive seems to arbitrarily change between the two.
    I have read a few notes on the forums about this but none of them have proven useful in solving my problem.  I have checked the DI-API version on my PC and it is definitely using 8.0.177.0 which matches the version of SBO that I am running.  I have re-installed the DI etc without any success.
    The following is the code snippet which I am using to test:  I have verified that the referenced purchase order is open, contains the correct item, customer etc
    int iResult = -1;
    string sResult = string.Empty;
    string sOutput = string.Empty;
    try
    sOutput += Environment.NewLine + "Connecting to company...";
          sbocoy = new SAPbobsCOM.Company();
          sbocoy.Server = "<insert server name here>";
          sbocoy.CompanyDB = "<insert database name here>";
          sbocoy.LicenseServer = "<insert server name here>:30000";
          sbocoy.UseTrusted = true;
          sbocoy.DbServerType = SAPbobsCOM.BoDataServerTypes.dst_MSSQL2005;
          sbocoy.UserName = "manager";
          sbocoy.Password = "<inser sap user here>";
          iResult = sbocoy.Connect();
          sOutput += Environment.NewLine + "Connected";
          SAPbobsCOM.Documents PO = (SAPbobsCOM.Documents)sbocoy.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oPurchaseOrders);
          SAPbobsCOM.Documents GoodsReceiptPO = (SAPbobsCOM.Documents)sbocoy.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oPurchaseDeliveryNotes);
          sOutput += Environment.NewLine + "Get Purchase Order";
          PO.GetByKey(1402);
          sOutput += Environment.NewLine + String.Format("DocNum: {0}; DocEntry: {1}; ItemCode: {2}; LineNum: {3}", PO.DocNum, PO.DocEntry, PO.Lines.ItemCode, PO.Lines.LineNum);
          GoodsReceiptPO.CardCode = PO.CardCode;
          GoodsReceiptPO.CardName = PO.CardName;
          GoodsReceiptPO.Lines.ItemCode = PO.Lines.ItemCode;
          GoodsReceiptPO.Lines.ItemDescription = PO.Lines.ItemDescription;
          GoodsReceiptPO.Lines.Quantity = 1.0;
          GoodsReceiptPO.Lines.BaseType = int.Parse(PO.DocObjectCodeEx); // If I comment out this and the next two lines the document will add
          GoodsReceiptPO.Lines.BaseEntry = PO.DocEntry;
          GoodsReceiptPO.Lines.BaseLine = PO.Lines.LineNum;
          sOutput += Environment.NewLine + "Adding Goods Receipt...";
          iResult = GoodsReceiptPO.Add();
          sResult = sbocoy.GetLastErrorDescription();
          sOutput += Environment.NewLine + string.Format("Result [{0}] {1}", iResult, sResult);
    catch (Exception ex)
    sOutput += string.Format(Environment.NewLine + "Exception: {0}{1}SBOError: {2}", ex.Message, Environment.NewLine, sbocoy.GetLastErrorDescription());
    The results when I try and reference the purchase order are:
    Connecting to company...
    Connected
    Get Purchase Order
    DocNum: 301396; DocEntry: 1402; ItemCode: SEANTESTITEM; LineNum: 1
    Adding Goods Receipt...
    Exception: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt.
    If I comment out the 3 lines that reference the base document the Goods Receipt Adds and the following is the output...
    Connecting to company...
    Connected
    Get Purchase Order
    DocNum: 301396; DocEntry: 1402; ItemCode: SEANTESTITEM; LineNum: 1
    Adding Goods Receipt...
    Result [0]
    The above code will work correctly if we base a Delivery Note on a Sales Order so it appears to be specifically related to the Purchasing Documents.
    Edited by: Sean Archer on Feb 2, 2009 2:23 PM

    Hi Ganesh,
    Thank you for the reply.
    I ran the add-on against another database and it is working.
    I also verified that the document was failing to create if done via the Data Transfer Workbench so it would appear the issue affects the DI-API irrespective of add-on.
    I will need to do more testing to confirm whether this is a bug with PL41 of 2007A or a corrupt database as you suggest.
    Cheers,
    Sean

  • Data Migration for Open Purchase Order

    Hi, All,
    Is there anyone know how to Count the volume for Open Purchase Order. What's the normal strategy for the Data Migration and Cut-over stage?
    My client want to know how many Open Purchase Order in the legacy system and then determine manual or automatic data migration. If manual, how to do? If automatic, how to do? Because all materials and vendors, plants are different number. How to track? How to find out to match between new and old?
    Thank you very much

    JC,
    Sounds a bit early to be making decisions about the realization phase.  It doesn't sound like you have finished the Blueprinting phase yet, much less the testing phase.
    Anyhow, in my experience I typically use LSMW (Legacy system migration workbench) to load MM master data (material masters), Inventory (WIP, RM, FG, etc) Purchasing Master data (Vendors, Purchase Info Records, Source Lists, Quota Arrangements), and Purchasing transactional documents (POs, PurReqs, Scheduling Agreements, etc).  Depending on the complexity and volume of data, it  may be necessary to write custom programs to load the data.  You will find this out during your requirements gathering.
    It is uncommon but possible to load all of these data manually.  I have never run across a client that wants to pay a consultant's hourly rate to sit at a terminal to peck away loading master data, so if the client intends to have his own users enter the data manually, the project manager should make provision that there will be qualified TRAINED client employees available for this data entry.  I did help with a portion of a conversion once manually; of Sales Credits, but there were only about 30 SD docs to load.   I did this the evening before go-live day, while I was waiting for some of my LSMW projects to complete in the background.
    A good opportunity to 'practice' your data loads is right after you have completed your development and customization, and you have gotten the approval from the client to proceed from the pilot build to the full test environment.  Once you have moved your workbench and customization into the client's test environment, but before integration testing, you can mass load all, or a substantial portion of your conversion data into the qual system.  You can treat it like a dry run for go-live, and fine tune your processes, as well as your LSMW projects.
    Yes, it is good practice to generate comparisons between legacy and SAP even if the client doesn't ask for it. For Purchase orders on the SAP side, you could use any of the standard SAP Purchasing reports, such as ME2W, ME2M, ME2C, ME2L, ME2N.  If these reports do not meet the requirements of the client, you could write a query to display the loaded data, or have an ABAPer write a custom report.
    You didn't ask, but you should also do comparisons of ALL loaded data - including master data.
    It sounds like you are implying that the client wants YOU to extract the legacy data.  For an SAP consultant, this is not very realistic (unless the legacy system is another SAP system).  Most of us do not understand the workings of the myriad legacy systems.  The client is usually expected to produce one or more legacy system technical experts for you to liase with.  You normally negotiate with the technical expert about every facet of of the data migration.  In addition, you will liase with business users, who will help you and the implementation team to logically validate that the final solution (turnkey SAP production system, fully loaded with data) will meet the client's business needs.
    Finally, you mentioned how do you track the mapping of master data between legacy and SAP.  There are many ways to do this.  I normally try to get the legacy person do the conversion on his end, eg, when he gives you the load file, you would like to have already translated the master data and inserted the SAP relevant values into the file.  If this is not possible, I usually use MS Access databases to maintain a master map, and I perform the mapping on a PC.  If your data package is small, you can probably get by using MS Excel or similar.
    Good Luck,
    DB49

  • Is there any method to stop rescheduling of the PO Need By date from ATP if there is any holiday specified in shipping calender. The requirement is to update the schedule ship date on Sales Order but the lead time of  Purchase Order should not increase

    We are currently not able to manage schedule ship date proposed by ATP when our warehouse is closed. For example , we would like that ATP doesn't propose any schedule ship date for the first of May , which is a non working day in France. The constraint is that we don't want our purchase need by date to be impacted by the process.
    I tried to closed one day in FR1 calendar and, after testing with order management, it appears that ATP didn't propose the closed day, so that's fine, but, our purchase order lead time was increased of 1 day and this is not what we expected.
    Can you help us to find the right process.
    Thanks

    Hi Sandeep,
    when we try to Rescheduled out the PO and the request is errored out the with the error:-
    Start of log messages from FND_FILE
    reschedule fails
    old date in planner workbench: 19-MAY-11
    new date: 07-JUN-11
    header: 417474
    line: 605652
    po number: 2049031859
    shipment no: 1
    The need by date/promised date in the source instance is not the same as the need by date/promised date in the destination instance.
    In the source instance,
    The need by date is 19-MAY-11, and the promised date is 19-MAY-11
    End of log messages from FND_FILE
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe you are looking for