QM workcenter with material specification

Hi there ,
I am using the material spec for a material to inspect. Can anyone please suggest me that where can I maintain the QM workcenter for it as we are not using the inspection plan
Regards
Kaushik

Hi.
However, since you cannot predefine work centers in the material specification, but the inspection specifications are defined in the material specification, you must proceed as follows:
a)You create a material specification with master inspection characteristics.
b)You create a dummy inspection plan that only contains one operation with one work center.
c)In the inspection setup (Quality Management view of the material master), set the indicators Insp. with task list and Insp. with mat spec
Amol

Similar Messages

QM Material specification with inspection plan

Hello,
I'm trying to setup QM material spec with inspection plan and it doesn't work.
I setup material master (With insp plant and with material spec).
I Created a characteristic that I used in my inspection plan and maintained the characteristic in the material specification.
When I create an inspection lot (89), the characteristic is always inserted at the end instead of redefining my specifications into the pre-defined characteristic.
Have I missed something?
Ghislain

As per our business scenario for Pharmaceutical we use Inspection with attached MIC with Sampling and Sample drawing Procedure, Sampling scheme to check the Quality of RM/PM/FP, can u give me some idea regarding;
1) Material Specificaton in Inspection plan
2) Reference Operation set with its use.
3) Dynamic Modification Rule
As for pharma we do;
1) Create MIC
2) Create Inspection plan
3) Attaching the MIC to an Inspection plan with sampling and sample drawing procedure
4) Attacing an Inspection Plan to an Inspection Lot
5) Result Recording and Usage Decision of Inspection lot for
In Automotive and othe Process Industry how the Dynamic modification rule,reference operation set, material specification flow.
Reply will be rewarded
Thanks in advance its urgernt

Stop user creating process order with material for specific order type

Hey Team,
Is there a way where I can stop creating process order with material for specific order type says Z*. We are using ZNMA order type to create trial batch and we do not want to create process order with material for this order type.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Bhavesh Patel.

You can restrict the order creation in CO01 based on authorization, Remove the authorization for Z order type for the particular user, Check with your basis Guy

Material replication from R/3 to SRM - Issue with Material group

Hello All,
                  I am working on BADI PRODUCT_CUSTOMER2 and method MAP_R3_TO_CRM_MATERIALMaterial replication part from R/3 to SRM.
I am using a Ztable to map r/3 material group to SRM material group(Product category).
For example Material M1 with material group 100 is transferred to SRM. Material group(Product category) 100 exist in SRM, but I am changing the material group to 200 in the product_customer2 badi. its working fine.
In another scenario, Material with material M1 with material group 300. Material group(product category) 300 does not exist in SRM,
I am changing the material group to 200 in the bdoc, in the product_customer2 badi. It is not working. The LUW is failing in SMQ2 transaction with the error "Error in Mapping (Details: transaction SMW01)". The BDOC is failing with error "Category for material group 300 does not exist"
I tried to deactivate the badi PRODUCT_CUSTOMER2, even then the FM MAP_BAPIMTCS_AND_PROCESS is validating the material group from R/3.
I tried to change the material group 300 to the existing material group 200 at initial stage in debugging in function module MAP_BAPIMTCS_AND_PROCESS but still the bdoc is failing with error "No storage form defined for product type 01 / logical system".
I am doing my testing using the following steps.
1. change the material descriptioni in MM02 in R/3.
2. An item is displayed in the queue in SMQ2 in SRM.
3. I have debugged the LUW and analyzed my badi by setting breakpoint at method MAP_R3_TO_CRM_MATERIAL, its changing the material group in the bdoc properly.
   that didnt work.
   also i tried to change the material group in the function module MAP_BAPIMTCS_AND_PROCESS before the badi is called.
4. I am checking the BDOc status using tcode SMW01 and checking the material using tcode COMMPR01.
can someone tell me how I can change the R/3 material group to SRM material group at the time of mapping in SRM?
Thanks
Sathish PM

Hi find below for the product cat
Steps to create the product category in SRM:
1) Create MM material groups in ECC client. This will create a transport. Go to SRM Tcode R3AS and select the object u201CDNL_CUST_PROD1u201D from the list and run it. You can monitor the job using R3AM1 in SRM. This will bring the material group into SRM. This can be seen in TCode u201CCOMM_HIERARCHYu201D in SRM.
2) Once it is done. Go to IMG in SRM and go to path SRM> SRM server> Cross app biz settings> Account aassigmnet> Define GL code for Acc *** Cat and Prod Cat. Maintain the GL code against this prod cat for all the account assignment codes. This is client specific setting and need to be done in every client by opening it. This GL code is given in the form in ticket.
3) Do a test and check if the product category is available for procurement in SC.
Regards,
Satish

Material specific status in material master

Hi,
We have a material A. in the material master for A, in the basic data ,the "X plant mat status is Z4 which means material discontinued. In the sales org tab for the same material, the "dis chain specific status" is Z1 which also means material under discontinuation.
But the issue is we are able to create and save sales order for material A.
i would like to know what is the issue. the system should not allow to create sales order. Also where are these material specific status configured and where is the control to block the sales order based on these material status.
regds

the creation of sales order is not controlled with a material status, it is only controlled with customizing of sales status.
The sales status can be defined in IMG > Logistics general > material master > setting for central fields > sales relevant data > define sales status.

Material specific value contract

Hi SAP Gurus,
I have a problem while creating material specific value contract WK2. After creating the value contract for INR 50000 and doing the neccessary settings in item category WKN, i created a relaease order with value as INR 500.
I can see the release order in the documnet flow of the contract, but in the contract overview screen value released is not reflecting, which i am expecting as 50000-500 = 49500. So the value released should reflect as INR 500.
Please correct me if i am wrong.
Regards
S R Sahoo

Dear Friend,
Thanks for your reply. I have already done the following settings.
In VTAA I have already set the Cont. item copy mode to B for both
WK2 to WA and WK2 to OR.
Please suggest further.
Regards,
S R Sahoo

Material specification and Inspection plan - Task list usage

Dear Friends,
In inspection type Task list usage is assigned
For Example
inspection type 01 - usage - 03
inspection type 05 - usage - 05
inspection type 06 - usage - 07
inspection type 10 - usage - 06
In my scenario i want to use all the above inspection type for a product
if i use mateial specification there is no any problem with my Task list usage
If suppose i use inspection plan do i need to create different inspection plan with different usage
or is it possible to create one inspection plan with all the above usage
what about universal usage 03 can i use it
i try to use but system does not triggering inspection lot
can any one Suggest some ideas
Many Thanks & Regards
Raj

Hi Raju,
All of first pls understand the concept of Task list and specification.
If you need to inspection any material in very systematic manner, where you will have well segregated operations where the appropriate Work Centers will be bind and under that hierarchy MIC will be attached. The inspection will be governed by some inspection points. And according the the same Samples will be calculated. When you wanna go with all these functionality then you must have to use Task list (Inspection plan).
And if you don't wish to have these functions then simply go with the material specification.
Now it comes the actual query about task list usage.
If there is a common inspection plan is supposed to be used for all the inspection types for your material then you can prepare only one inspection plan, put ant of the Usage to it it can be 05 or 03 universal. But what you have to do is,
Go to SPRO->Quality Management->Quality Inspection->Inspection Lot Creation->Maintain Inspection Types Execute and set the Task list usage as the same it is set in the inspection plan for all those Inspection types for which that common inspection plan is supposed to be used.
Note:- There is no any link between inspection lot creation and task list usage of inspection plan.
Regards,
Shyamal

Why do we need material specification for transfering results to class char.

Hi,
Can you guys tell me why do we need to create material specification if we want to transfer quality inspection results to a batch class?
Basically I have done the following:
-Create Class Characteristic
-Assign the Class Characteristic to a batch class
-Link Class Char. to MIC
-Assign MIC to an Inspection Plan
-Post GR, batch and inspection lot are created automatically
-Record Results for inspection Lot
-Make UD for Inspection Lot
The result is not transferred to batch class, then I create material specification with the MIC assigned, the results can be transferred. But why?
Best regards
Danny

Hello Danny,
This is a standard program, which checks for this indicator at the time of inspection lot completion.
F1- help gives satisfactory explanation
Batch Valuation Possible Without Specification
Use
If you set this indicator, a link between the master inspection
characteristics and the class characteristics for the batch class must exist
when an inspection lot is created, for batch valuation to occur when the usage
decision or inspection point valuation is made. A link within the material
specification is not required.
If you do not set this indicator, batch valuation only occurs when the
usage decision or inspection point valuation is made, if a link using the
material specification exists between the master inspection characteristics and
the class characteristics for the batch class. In this way, you can control on a
material-dependent basis whether the batch characteristics are valuated based on
the inspection results.
Amol.
Message was edited by: Amol Manave : Main purpose is you can control whether Batch characteristics should be valuated based on results or not for particular material. If you set this indicator then batch characteristics will be valuated for all materials and in opposite case Batch characteristics will be valuated for only materials for which Material Specification exists.

Manual inspection lot with out specification

Hi gurus,
can anybody give me an example for Manual inspection lot with out specification?
regards,
sbabu

Hi,
Actually it is not useful in manual inspection lot because manual inspection lot used to check your quality of material at any movement.
Means for example your raw material is in store department but some time you suspect something about quality & you take decision to check quality of material that time it can be used. So in this case result record is mandatary,
Because your intention to create lot to checked material so not use ful without specification .
Also not any posting happening through this lot.just to check the material at any instance.
For any further clarification revert me back.
Some time client want to create lot but do not want to take results for that just they are interested in giving
UD & stock posting in that case you can remove tick task list required .This requirement mostly demanded for certain Engg items they do not want go material directly to unrestricted. it will go through UD.
But manual inspection lot I do not think it much useful.
Regards
SANIL

Item category group for Sales of Nonstock Item with Order Specific Procurem

What will be the item category & group for the material for Sales of Nonstock Item with Order Specific Procurement.So that purchase requestation is created

Hi
As of my Understanding this a scenario of THIRD PARTY SALE WITH SHIPMENT where delivery will be created . Addition to the previous setting few more changes that need to be accomodated like it has to be delivery related billing - A for item category
The indicator 'E' will make sure the Stock will be procured only against the particular sale order and it will be delivered only against this sales order. Apart from this there are few more thing need to be done with the Schedule line level
You need to give the movement type 601, item relevant for delivery need to be checked, order type from the MM side need to be assigned, item category from MM and Account assignment group from MM, all these need to to be maintianed in Schedule line level.
Infact why not TAS , we can use TAN , or ZTAN itself But as per the scenario we need to do the changes as required.
Doing all this we can process this order.
Thanks.................Rishi

ATP : Customer/Material Specific ATP Check - overruling MAD

Hey all,
Situation
We have a business rule where some customers will need to get an 21 day's order leadtime, regardless of requested delivery date. so, if a customer orders a given product today, for delivery next week....SAP/ATP needs to overrule the MAD and set it to : Today +21 day's., then start counting the day's it requires to deliver it to the customer (route).
The business rule is only valid for certain customers AND materials.
Question :
Can this be achieved with SAP standard config or is this user exit ....?
Any ideas how this can be achieved?
Many thanks

Hi,
Not sure whether the following would help your situation.
Trying to use the user exits
1) EXIT_SAPLATPC_001 (Processing Requirements Table Before Calling Actual Check) or
2) EXIT_SAPLATPC_002 (Processing Results of Actual Check).
These are available in the exit names ATP00001.
Since you have mentioned about only for specific materials and specific customers this additional date rule applies, you can think about using any of the additional available fields like Customer master -> Sales area data -> Extras -> Customer grp1 to 5 fields and/or with material master -> sales: sales org2->material group1 to material group5 fields to store the additional days.
The user exit can check this field and add the days to calculate the MAD.
Regards,

Integrate Barcode with Material Master

Dear Gurus,
My requirement is to integrate barcode with material master, such that if I scan the barcode, the material number to be automatically populated from the master while creating PO or a transfer posting.
Please let me know the possible means/procedures to do this..
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Arvind.

Thanks Dipak, Is this possible with only standards. Specifically I want to use a standard solution only.. Thanks

Deleting emails with a specific subject from a single user mailbox

we are exchange 2007 on SP1. we do not have an edge server, only a hub server.
A user mailbox was flooded with 11000 "Undeliverable:" emails in the last 2 days, the source being "DSA". I am still finding out why this has happened. As for now, I have set up a rule to silently drop all emails with this specific subject.
now the user wanted our team to delete all of these 11000 emails from his mailbox.
we gave the appropriate permission to the users mailbox by running the command
Get-Mailbox -Identity “[email protected]” | Add-MailboxPermission -User [email protected] -AccessRights FullAccess -InheritanceType all
Then I ran the below command
Get-Mailbox -Identity “[email protected]” | Export-Mailbox -SubjectKeywords "Undeliverable:" -IncludeFolders "\Inbox" -StartDate "09/22/2014" -EndDate "09/23/2014" -DeleteContent -Confirm:$false
The command ran for a while, showing it was deleting 19000 odd emails with the below summary
[PS] C:\Windows\System32>Get-Mailbox -Identity "[email protected]" | Export-Mailb
ox -SubjectKeywords "Undeliverable:" -IncludeFolders "\Inbox" -StartDate "09/22/
2014" -EndDate "09/23/2014" -DeleteContent -Confirm:$false
TargetMailbox :
TargetServer :
TargetDatabase :
MailboxSize : 733800KB
IsResourceMailbox : False
SIDUsedInMatch :
SMTPProxies :
SourceManager :
SourceDirectReports :
SourcePublicDelegates :
SourcePublicDelegatesBL :
SourceAltRecipient :
SourceAltRecipientBL :
SourceDeliverAndRedirect :
MatchedTargetNTAccountDN :
IsMatchedNTAccountMailboxEnabled :
MatchedContactsDNList :
TargetNTAccountDNToCreate :
TargetManager :
TargetDirectReports :
TargetPublicDelegates :
TargetPublicDelegatesBL :
TargetAltRecipient :
TargetAltRecipientBL :
TargetDeliverAndRedirect :
Options : DeleteSourceContent
SourceForestCredential :
TargetForestCredential :
TargetFolder :
PSTFilePath :
RsgMailboxGuid :
RsgMailboxLegacyExchangeDN :
RsgMailboxDisplayName :
RsgDatabaseGuid :
StandardMessagesDeleted : 0
AssociatedMessagesDeleted : 0
DumpsterMessagesDeleted : 19020
MoveType : DeleteOnly
MoveStage : Completed
StartTime : 9/23/2014 7:29:01 PM
EndTime : 9/23/2014 7:32:19 PM
StatusCode : 0
StatusMessage : Messages have been deleted from the source m
ailbox.
ReportFile : C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\L
ogging\MigrationLogs\export-Mailbox20140923-
192900-8103154.xml
However, when I open the user's mailbox all of the emails still exist. kindly help me understand where I am going wrong and how I can delete all these emails.
Thank You
Philip

Are they still specifically in the Inbox?
I was thinking that the account might have "Deny" permissions to the user's mailbox but it looks like it can access the mailbox and delete items.
StandardMessagesDeleted          : 0
AssociatedMessagesDeleted        : 0
DumpsterMessagesDeleted         : 19020
Please mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

With holding tax report with material and qty fields

Dear All,
Is there any standard report available with with holding tax data with material and qty fields.
Thanks,
Sekhar.

dear Friend,
Withholding tax will deduct on services. Hence Material and quantity is not relavent.
There is no report is available also.
reg
Madhu M

Issue with language specific characters combined with AD-Logon to BO platform and client tools

We are using SSO via Win AD to logon to BO-Launchpad. Generally this is working which means for Launch Pad no manual log on is needed. But this is not working for users which have language specific letters in their AD name (e.g. öäüéèê...).
What we have tried up to now:
If the AD-User name is Test-BÖ the log on is working with the user name Test-BO with logon type AD
If the logon Type "SAP" is used than it is possible to use the name Test-BÖ as the username
Generally it is no problem in AD to use language specific letters (which means it is possible to e.g. log on to Windows with the user Test-BÖ)
It is possible to read out the AD attributes from BO side and add them to the user. Which means in the user attributes the AD name Test-BÖ is shown via automatic import from AD. So it's not the problem that the character does not reach BO.
I have opened a ticket concerning that. SAP 1th level support is telling me that this is not a BO problem. They say it is a problem of Tomcat. I don't believe that because the log on with authentification type SAP is working.
I have set up the same combination (AD User Test-BÖ with SAP User Test-BÖ) as a single sign on authentification in SAP BW and there it is working without problems.
Which leads me to the conlusion: It is not a problem of AD. It is something which is connected to the BO platform but only combined with logon type AD because SAP Logon is working with language specific characters.

I have found this article with BO support:
You cannot add a user name or an object name that only differs by a character with a diacritic mark
Basically this means AD stores the country specific letters as a base letter internally. Which means that if you have created a user with a country specific letter in the name you can also logon with the Base letter to Windows.
SAP-GUI and Windows are maybe replacing the country specific letters by the base letter. Due to that SSO is working. BO seems not to be able to do that. Up to now the supporter from BO is telling me that this is not a BO problem.
Seems to be magic that the colleagues of SAP-GUI are able to to it.

QM workcenter with material specification

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for