Quality Certificate Issue with multiple batchs with same delivery note

Hi,
Hi,
My Company Business Process:
Quality certificates are generated prior to the good receipt through IDOC process.
When we  receive the goods, GR should look for existing quality certificates and trasnfer the inspection results to inspection lot.
When we are trying to receive for single batch & delivery note, It is looking for existing quality certificates. There is no problem in this senario.
But when we receive the multiple batchs with the same delivery note, system is generating new quality certificates. It is not looking for existing QC which got generated through IDOC process. This is the actual proble.
Note: I am not sure is standard SAP does not supprot  to receive the multiple batchs with the same delivery note or not at the time of GR. Please advise me.
Thanks,
Suman

In data origin in certificate profile SAP supports " mix the origins within a characteristic. For example, the results data can originate from an inspection and the specification data can originate from batch determination."
Now here question arises Is batch determination of one batch or multiple bacthes took place against a single delivery note.
As per my understnading it should be one batch with is supported in std SAP.

Similar Messages

  • Handling Unit with multiple batches

    HI,
    Is it possible to create a Handling Unit with multiple batches, when packing a Handling Unit in a Production Order (COWBPACK)?
    Thanks

    When I create a  packing instruction (transaction POP1), I can set indicator "Indicator Batch Mix Allowed".
    Explenation:
    If this indicator is set, then several batches of the same material may be packed in one handling unit.
    Otherwise, only one batch may be packed.
    Use
    When determining the packing status, the system checks for batch mix violation.
    But I still can not create an HU with different batches.
    Can anyone help me?

  • TO Confirmation. Handling units with multiple batches.

    Hi all!!
    I have a problem when i try to confirm an outbound TO with several positions. The problem is that the proposed handling unit is different than the original one. This problem only occurs when the handling unit has several batches, if there's only one this doesn't happen.
    This is configured in the customizing of the movement(601), but I don't know why it doesn´t work with multiple batches.
    Any idea?
    Thanks a lot.

    Hi!
    I have had the same problem and I put a note to sap. Their answer was:
    "As per my previous reply, the functionality you are requesting is not
    available in the standard system.  When processing a TO, each item is
    confirmed line by line.  There is no check on the remaining TO items
    if there is remaining stock in the source HU."
    Hope this help.
    Regards,
    Tatiana

  • Move SU with multiple batches

    In the client's WH there can be pallets (storage units) with multiple batches. This is configured and works OK. However these storage units cannot be moved. Obviously when moved, they must keep their SU number.
    If I try to move only 1 batch, the movement is not allowed because then a duplicate SU will result.
    If I try to move the whole quantity, the data in the TO will not be consistent.
    Actually in both cases I get the message
    Storage unit XXXXXis not consistent with other transfer order data
    I have tried moving them in LT01. I also tried in LT10 - here the system moved both but assigned a new SU to one of the batches. (?!?!?!?!)
    Is there a way to move such pallets? And if not , why is there a config option for mixed batches for SU, IF IT DOES NOT WORK???
    Edited by: HunLogistic on Feb 10, 2010 3:34 PM

    In the client's WH there can be pallets (storage units) with multiple batches. This is configured and works OK. However these storage units cannot be moved. Obviously when moved, they must keep their SU number.
    This is obviously not true.
    The storage unit number uinquely identifies the storage unit within your warehouse. If you pick up goods from your storage unit you cannot use the same ID for the new unit since in this case you would have two SUs with same ID in your WH.
    Standard system is working poperly, you can have mixed storage units with different materials and batches and you can use complete and partial stock removal w/o any problem - please see online help.
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/c6/f846eb4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    If you only transfer a part of the storage unit into another SU-managed storage type, the system assigns a new SU number for this part of the original SU...
    Isn't it possible that there's a developemnt which want to use the existing SU number for the new one?
    Regards,
    Csaba
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Feb 10, 2010 4:08 PM

  • [svn] 949: Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name , it causes a ClassCastException in the server

    Revision: 949
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-03-27 07:12:59 -0700 (Thu, 27 Mar 2008)
    Log Message:
    Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name, it causes a ClassCastException in the server
    QA: Yes - try again with legacy-collection true and false.
    Doc: No
    Checkintests: Pass
    Details: Another try in fixing this bug. When legacy-collection is false, Actionscript Array on the client becomes Java Array on the server and my fix yesterday assumed this case. However, when legacy-collection is true, Actionscript Array becomes Java ArrayList on the server. So added code to handle this case.
    Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-96
    Modified Paths:
    blazeds/branches/3.0.x/modules/proxy/src/java/flex/messaging/services/http/proxy/RequestF ilter.java

    Hi all!
    Just to post the solution to this if anyone ever runs accross this thread...
    For some reason i had it bad the first time, don't have time right now to see why but here is what worked for me:
    HashMap primaryFile = new HashMap();
    primaryFile.put("fileContent", bFile);
    primaryFile.put("fileName", uploadedFile.getFilename());
    operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("primaryFile", primaryFile);
    HashMap customDocMetadata = new HashMap();
    HashMap [] properties = new HashMap[1];
    HashMap customMetadataPropertyRoom = new HashMap();
    customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("name", "xRoom");
    customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("value", "SOME ROOM");
    properties[0] = customMetadataPropertyRoom;
    customDocMetadata.put("property", properties);
    operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("CustomDocMetaData", customDocMetadata);
    Basically an unbounded wsdl type is an array of objects (HashMaps), makes sense, i thought i had it like this before, must have messed up somewhere...
    Good luck all!

  • [svn] 931: Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name , it causes a ClassCastException in the server

    Revision: 931
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-03-26 11:31:01 -0700 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008)
    Log Message:
    Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name, it causes a ClassCastException in the server
    QA: Yes - we need automated tests for this basic case.
    Doc: No
    Checkintests: Pass
    Details: RequestFilter was not handling multiple headers with the same name properly.
    Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-96
    Modified Paths:
    blazeds/branches/3.0.x/modules/proxy/src/java/flex/messaging/services/http/proxy/RequestF ilter.java

    Hi all!
    Just to post the solution to this if anyone ever runs accross this thread...
    For some reason i had it bad the first time, don't have time right now to see why but here is what worked for me:
    HashMap primaryFile = new HashMap();
    primaryFile.put("fileContent", bFile);
    primaryFile.put("fileName", uploadedFile.getFilename());
    operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("primaryFile", primaryFile);
    HashMap customDocMetadata = new HashMap();
    HashMap [] properties = new HashMap[1];
    HashMap customMetadataPropertyRoom = new HashMap();
    customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("name", "xRoom");
    customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("value", "SOME ROOM");
    properties[0] = customMetadataPropertyRoom;
    customDocMetadata.put("property", properties);
    operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("CustomDocMetaData", customDocMetadata);
    Basically an unbounded wsdl type is an array of objects (HashMaps), makes sense, i thought i had it like this before, must have messed up somewhere...
    Good luck all!

  • Looking to create delivery with multiple batch line items

    Hi,
       Can you please suggest me BAPI / FM to create a delivery with multiple batches. like ... i have 1 mail line item in the delivery and n sub line items. If possible can you please post req parameters too. Thanks in advance.

    solved my own

  • ITunes is totally frozen with multiple paints of same screen within itself. Also incredibly slow. Are there alternative players I can use with my iPhone, or must I use iTunes with my iPhone? iTunes is effectively unusably slow.

    iTunes is totally frozen with multiple paints of same screen within itself. Also incredibly slow. Are there alternative players I can use with my iPhone, or must I use iTunes with my iPhone? iTunes is effectively unusably slow. I am using Windows 7.
    I only use it once every few weeks and each time it is more disappointing than the previous time. does it run better on a Mac than Windows? Is this app really the future of media? Really?

    I am using iTunes 11.1.3 -- The most recent version. When I select something from my albums it just freezes. I have restarted it a few times with same result.

  • Web dynpro screen with multiple rows with columns that can be edited

    Web dynpro screen with multiple rows with columns that can be edited individually:
    Hi
    I am busy creating a screen in web dynpro for ABAP which we would like to make available via Portal ESS (Portal 7).
    I need to add 'n type of table (or almost something like Excel) or something in which someone can type a few paycode numbers (there should be lets say 10 blank rows in which info can be typed in and if I click on a button or so, more rows must be added if necessary.  Then in the other colums stuff like amounts must be entered which one should also be able to edit then and there.
    Can anyone assist in what I can use for this?  There does not seem to be some existing element that I can use.
    Help will be appreciated.
    Regards
    Debbie

    Hi Debbie,
    Whiel Creating table you need to be care full that use chose INPUT FIELD as the CELL EDITOR. Just guessing that if ur table is not editable u might have choosen TextView as default cell editor type.
    check link for details on TABLE UI
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/EN/b5/ac884118aa1709e10000000a155106/frameset.htm]
    easy way is to first add UI ELEMENT TABLE to your VIEW, then right click over it & select create binding from context. After you have a pop up where you can select what columns you want what should be its cell editor etc.
    Greetings
    Prashant

  • Duplicate GR Posting Control With Respect to MIGO Filed Delivery Note

    Hi Team,
    Is there any possiblity to check / control GR Posting with respect to the same PO and same delivery note reference.
    I have a PO 1000001 with line item 10 with qty 100. I did a MIGO with respect to this PO for 50 qty with delivery note ref DC-53.
    When i try to do MIGO with the same PO and same delivery note DC-53 for the balance 50 quantiy,
    System should intimate me as warning / error..
    How can we acheive this by standard  SAP.  If not possible by standard SAP wats the alternate.
    Vijay

    HI Vijay,
    It is possible to check warning / error message display of the MIGO bottom of the screen through ABAP delveloper with enhancement (Validation).
    After enhancement, MIGO posting is not allow to duplicate DC Ref.no. and also double entry of the same DC ref.no.
    Hope, it is useful for you.
    Regards,
    K.Rajendran.

  • Double entry of same delivery note during GR

    Dear experts,
    I want system to restrict user from making double GR against same delivery note number.
    Plz suggest me the solution.
    Can you tel me whether any user exit is available for the same & how to fulfill this requirement.
    Awaiting for ur valuable guidance....
    Thanks & Regards,
    Subhash

    Hi
    U can achive this by use of user exit
    check if u can apply following user exit in for MIGO
    MBCF0002
    MBCF0005
    u need to check same with help of abaper
    generally we can add user exit for trnx in CMOD code
    Vishal...

  • Create inbound delivery for same material with multiple batches

    Hi Experts,
    An ASN( advanced shipping notification) contains multiple batch numbers for same material or line item.An IDOC has different segments with batch numbers but in SAP while creating Inbound delivery(VL31N) only batch number ( segment) get posted automatically in SAP other batches are need to post manuaaly.
    I am using IDoc type : Delivery03 ,Message type: DESADV
    How to resolve this problem?
    Thanks,
    Anil

    Hi Anil,
    Welcome to SCN for your first post. Did you check with your functional people about this.
    Regards,
    Madhu.

  • Excise invoice capture with multiple batches

    Hi
    We have created a Purchase order for Material X and carried out the transfer posting(MB1B)and selected two different batched of stocks, and created excise invoice using
    t code J1IS.
    When I am capturing the excise invoice in J1IEX. with ref to Purchase order, system is showing only one line item.
    It is not capturing multiple batches.this. we are doing it before goods receipts.
    Regards
    Suresh

    Hi,
    Point1)
    Ur material directly goes to the site for site work right ?
    My question is why are u not taking the credit and dont want to update the part1 and part2.....???
    ur are the consignee(purchaser) for the same so u can take credit...!!!
    again one thing if ur not taking the credit then why r u bother about the excise settelement...Do the vendor invoice settelement. and inventorised the total excise.......
    Point 2)U need to maitain the excise master i.e J1ID...( it is as important as maitaining material master for procurement).If u want excise related transaction to be happened.
    Point 3) if ur not interested in maitaining the excise master then use ME51 report for analysis for excise settelement.
    regards,
    sujit borse

  • Issues with multiple Files with multiple subdbs on a single environment.

    I'm having an issue with Berkeley DB 4.2 on 32-bit platforms, regarding multiple physical files with multiple subdatabases in a single database environment. Specifically, when I open a subdatabase for a physical file, Berkeley DB thinks that it is using the same subdatabase in a different physical file.
    I'm doing the following:
    1. Create and open a db enviornment.
    2. Move file1 to the common area.
    3. Open, get and close the subdatabases in file1.
    4. Move file2 to the common area.
    5. Open, get and close the subdatabases in file2.
    6. remove file2 from the common area
    7. Move file3 to the common area.
    8. Open a subdatabase from file3. About 1/2 the time, the fetches
    return data from file2, not from file3.
    It's possible that at some earlier time (i.e. before step 1 of this
    test case), file1, file2 and file3 were the same file. I noticed
    that there is something called env->fileid_reset, but that is not
    in 4.2.52.
    Any ideas?

    Looks like I've resolved the issue

  • Home sharing to Apple TV with multiple users on same computer

    I have two different users on the same computer.  To facilitate sharing their music and movies to eachother, they are each using Home Sharing with the same Apple ID.  As long as both users remain logged in, this works with no problem.   Except for Apple TV.  The Apple TV can see each library, so they both show up in the list under Computers, but only one is accessible.  It's either the first one that broadcast itself, or the first one that Apple TV connected to, I'm not sure which.  But, once that's established, the second library will remain in the Computers list, but any attempt to connect to the library will fail.  It appears there is a limitation that Apple TV can only connect to a single library per physical computer, even though it can tell there are multiple libraries there.
    Does anyone have any idea how to work around this without consolidating the libraries?  Being able to connect to multiple libraries is the goal, not consoludating them.

    I don't have that set up anymore, but used to. I had no problems sharing from either library. Of course it may have changed since I used it, but wouldn't see why.

Maybe you are looking for