Quantity discrepancy
hi, we have a problem on quantity conversion...
For example : 1case = 48pcs
Base Unit of Measure is Case
When we make a return order at 5pcs, it is converted as 0.104 case
When we issue out the 5pcs, they system will say deficit, because when 0.104 case if converted back to pcs, quantity is only 4.992pcs
Any suggestion how we can handle such scenario? Is there rounding off function in IM to make 4.992 to 5pcs inventory?
Hi,
In CUNI you can see the Rounding off in Unit of measurement.
set rounding off there.
SAM
Similar Messages
-
Asset PO - Assets Masters Quantity Discrepancy?
Hello Experts Fi-AA,
We are facing problems with Assets POs. Observed a discrepancy in updation of quantity in asset masters
when an asset was procured through PO.
Case1 :
While creating asset masters if we left the quantity field blank, even when MIRO happened Quantity not updated.
Case2:
While creating asset masters if quantity was maintained in asset masters ,same was doubled when MIRO completed.
request kindly help in giving solution
thanks & regards
SrihariHi Srihari
If you create the Asset Master Leaving the Qty Field Blank, but updating the Unit of Measure (UOM) Field as EA, it always updates the Qty upon F-90 or MIGO/MIRO....
If UoM is not appearing in your Asset Master, then include the same from Screen Layout...
Br, Ajay M -
Invoice Plan and Quantity Discrepancy
I'm not sure if this belongs on this forem or the financial forum but since it involves POs and an MM transaction(MIRO) I decided to post it here.
We have an IR Only Purchase Order with multiple line items. The PO Order Quantity varies from 1 EA up to 6 EA on 34 different line items. An invoice plan manual invoice plan sing "Sample Partial Invoice Plan(20) as the Invoice Plan Type. The payments are split 30% - 30% - 30% - 10% with each payment due on a specific date.
So here is the problem:
When the first invoice was processed for 30% it assigned a "quantity of 1" on each line item in the invioce. This is affecting the Commitment dollars left on the order. For example for the line item with 4 EA in the PO quantity, the commitment dollars only dropped 25% of the 30% total for that line. So let's say the line item wa for $100,000 it should have reduced the commitment amount by $30,000. Instead since the invoice quantity defaulted to 1 it only reduced the commitment amount by $7,500.
This same ratio type posting occurred on each line item that had more than 1 EA on the PO. It appears that when processing the MIRO it will not allow one to change the quantity to the PO Order Quantity. Does anyone know how to change the quantity on the Invoice or is there a way to get the whole line item quantity to default onto the invoice when a payment is due?
Thanks in advance for your help,
DanHi Dan,
If the unit of measurement was set up as relevant for value based commitment reduction in transaction
CUNI, then the commitment reduction will be the same as the invoice amount.
If the unit of measurement was set up as relevant for quantity based commitment reduction in transaction
CUNI, then the commitment reduction is always according the to invoice quantity, which could lead to differences in the commitment values - which you have described.
Regards,
Edit -
Inventory - Quantity Discrepancy
Why do I show the correct quantity at the item master level but incorrect qty/value at the inventory valuation/audit report level?
We have just taken physical inventory - we entered our results into inventory tracking then posted using inventory posting.
When I check quantity of items using Item Master Data - "Inventory Data" Tab displays correct quantities in all warehouses.
My problem is when I run the "inventory valuation" or "Inventory Audit" Report - the results show quantities and values for items that we do not physically have - we posted "0u201D qty during our inventory posting and the system reports think we have "1".
The values appear to have been brought over during our initial migration as a u201Cgoods receiptu201D but I would assume that posting the current and correct quantities during physical inventory would correct the valuation reports.
Please help!
Andrew
SAPB1 2007A (8.00.177) SP 00 PL 41Thank you for this query - this produced a list of 517 items whicih demonstrate the same issues we are seeing.
Item Master Data / Items Status = correct values
Inventory Audit/Valuation Report = incorrect values
VERY HELPFUL QUERY - the question now is, what next?
Is this caused by the bug which was fixed in 2007A? I have read about the "Inventory Valuation Check-up" which i have requested our VAR look into....The VAR is currently trying to determine if our data was upgraded from 2005 or loaded directly into 2007.
Any info you can point me to is most appreciated!
Thank you! -
Hi Experts!
On our open order report, it shows that there is a quantity discrepancy. The third-party order had a quantity of 2 and it was fully delivered and invoiced/billed, and completed; however it still shows up with an error open order quantity of 2. I checked the order and it showed that the schedule line had been deleted, which had the delivered quantity as 2, and now it has none. Any suggestions on how to resolve this issue on the open order report? Thank you for your time in advance!
Best Regards,
WCHi,
If it had been fully invoice I don't think the system would have allowed the deletion. Are you sure that it has been fully invoiced? Or is it just showing zero to be invoiced (because the line has been deleted)?
What is the PO history showing?
Steve B -
Hi,
I have a question on GR/IR a/c.
When I post MIGO this is the entry:
Raw material a/c Dr
To GR/IR a/c
And when I post MIRO this is the entry:
GR/IR a/c Dr
To Vendor a/c
So here balance of GR/IR a/c is Zero . BUT WHEN EVER I SAW THE REPORT IN T.Cod FBL3N ALL THE LINE ITEMS ARE SHOWEN AS POEN ITEMS. WHY THESE LINE ITEMS ARE SHOWING AS OPEN ITEMS.
WHAT IS THE NEXT PROCES TO CLEAR THEM?
WHAT ARE THE OTHER ACTIVITIES? AND WHAT ARE THE MONTH END AND YEAR END ACTIVITIES REGARDING GR/IR a/c?
Answer will be very help full with detail T.Cods Etc.,
Thanku.Just to help you understand the overall process:
There are 2 basic steps to maintaining the GR/IR accounts (assuming you have th GR/IR accounts set as open item managed):
1. The balancing of GR and IR QUANTITY entries and adjustment of discrepancies. E.g. when a GR is posted and an invoice is never received or an invoice is posted and a GR is not posted etc. These quantity discrepancies/imbalances should be managed through the MR11 transaction which creates the ACCM documents with the appropriate information.
2. The clearing of offsetting debit and credit postings to the GR/IR account in the General Ledger (i.e. purely the offsetting of debit and credit monetary amounts). ZMRIRCON can help with this process but the standard SAP transaction F.13 can be used for the actual clearing)
When you process a GR and a corresponding IR, the GR/IR QUANTITY BALANCES are cleared as part of the document postings. Therefore, you would only need to use MR11 in cases where there was a quantity discrepancy (GR without IR, IR without GR etc).
However, all of the GR and IR documents are posting debit and credit MONETORY amounts to the GR/IR accounts, just like all accounting documents, and at some stage the debits and credits related to a particular set of related transactions should net out (i.e. once the GR and IR have been posted, or once the ACCM is created for a GR without an invoice etc).
At this stage, there is some action required (which would usually be an Accounting responsibility) to clear all of the u2018matchedu2019 open items. This is a general accounting practice not limited just to the GR/IR accounts. This clearing can be done via an automated process such as transaction F.13 or manually using a G/L clearing transaction. -
Hi
Is there anyone who can able to provide script to query the item_id on a specific Code
for example: Item Code 301425PDEP1XT?
ThanksHi sanjay
thanks
We have a problem on batch#169939 Quantity discrepancy problem, wherein the qty transacted was 770 pieces for product code: 301425PDEP1XT.
But, when the next stage Product code: 301425PDEP1XR Batch# 170139 will going to reserve or consume the 770 pieces from 301425PDEP1XT,
the quantity available to reserved is only 768 pieces wherein, it should be 770 pieces.
I already raised this in MOS but one of the tenchnical person there is asking for this
please provide me the item_id of your Item Code 301425PDEP1XT?
To be honest im not expert in making a scripts.
Thanks -
Discrepency of GR and IR quantity.
Hi,
in the event if the GR and IR quantity is different, my users are using MR11 to "clear-off" the discrepency amount. However, understand that the posting will be made to the Inventory G/L account.
Is there a way which the "clear-off" can be posting to another expense G/L account?
Thanks for the advice in advance.Hi
Result of MR11 will not hit Inventory accounts. it will take PRD account. Mean to say Open item in WRX will setoff at PRD account. You have 3 account modifier for PRD.
PRF for goods receipts against production orders and
order settlement
PRA for goods issues and other movements
PRU for transfer postings (price differences in the case
of external amounts)
Mainatin GL accounts as per your requirement in OBYC with these combination
Regards
Antony -
Credit Blocked 3rd Party Sales Order confirm quantity change discrepancy
Hi,
I am facing the below 3rd party SO qty change issue. Please check and advise me.
Step 1:
Created one 3rd Party SO for item A - 10 qty.
Step 2:
PO is created with reference of PR number (item A- 10 qty).
Setp 3:
Again I am changing the SO item A qty from 10 to 20 (i.e. SO value is increased).
Due Sales order value increase the credit check performed and due to customer credit
limit the system shown Static Credit Block message (SO blocked for Credit approval).
Setp 4:
I have saved the SO with the Credit Block message (still SO Credit Blocked).
Issue :
I have not released the Credit block in SO, Even the system has updated the SO confirmation qty as 20
and subsequent PR and PO also changed from 10 to 20 qty.
Regards
BaskarSee, the Credit Management System is designed to work in the SD side & not on the MM side.
Once PR is created, it is updated every time Tird party Sales Order changed which is basic requirement.
Once PR is created / updated, system (Credit Management) cannot the creation of PO & subsequent documents. This is becaus Credit Management is desinged to block creation of Sales Order, Delivery Document & PGI & nothing more.
That is why I suggested you to go to Z-Development & apply a User Exit.
Hope this clarifies.
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta -
Inventory Audit Report and Inventory G/L Account discrepancy
Good Day!
Hi Everybody. I had experienced a discrepancy between the Inventory Audit Report and Inventory G/L Account.
Before everything else, our client does not have any PO, GRPO. Only A/P Invoice and A/P Credit Memos so there are no difference being posted.
There were also no transactions posted directly in Inventory G/L Account but from observation, there is a minor difference. This only happened with two transactions in AP Invoice with Negative Quantity.
The AP Invoice is composed of a single item, the unit price is 180.00 x -58 pcs quantity. Total amount is -10,440.00.
G/L Account posting is
Inventory 10,440.00
A/P 10,440.00
In the FIFO layering, the item cost is 200.00 (based on the current stock value) and the current stock quantity before posting is 80 pcs . Since this is a negative quantity A/P Invoice, it seems that the cost of the item when the transaction will be posted is 200 (based on the current stock value) so when I view the Inventory Audit Report amount, it says the inventory cost/posting is -11,600 (200 x -58).
But on actual G/L Account, the posting is -10,440.00 from A/P Invoice, that's why the inventory discrepancy occurs. It seems that SAP B1's Inventory Audit Report confuses the FIFO cost posted versus G/L Account's posted based on the document. Since the document is A/P Invoice, SAP B1 assumes that the transaction will post the amount as the additional inventory cost and posting the inventory cost into Inventory G/L Account. However, since this is a negative document, the system is releasing the items, thus, FIFO kicks in. The Inventory Audit Report catches the amount based on FIFO costing. The problem is that the Inventory Audit Report is more accurate than the Inventory G/L Balance.
Any suggestion to fix this guys?HI,
i'my afraid you're in the wrong place. This is the Chinese forum. Please go to SAP Business One Application for help.
Best -
Material Quantity difference document line item for HU
Dear Experts,
When I try to clear differences in LI21, i get the error message as above.
Error Message : 'Material Quantity difference document line item for HU'
Any idea why this error occurs?
Regards,
ShettyHello Shetty,
It may be due to some stock inconsistency. You may try iin case of a non HU managed storage location HU to run LX23 and it can fix discrepancy overwrting MM-IM with LE-WM data. But if it is a HU managed then you can run HUDIFF transaction but only to see if there is stock differences not to fix anything, usually SAP Support (Development Support) does that job.
Have a nice day !! -
Hello experts,
I want to see the total quantity of all the line items in MIGO .
How is it possible.
I am aware that there can be a discrepancy in unit of measure. BUt still as SAP does in some of the reports
( like total storage location stock where it shows 1000 *** ) is it possible with MIGO?
RegardsHello,
You can get PO , GR ,IV qty and value in ME80FN transaction.
click on the change view on the report display screen and select PO history.
You can also check in ME2N t- code
Scope of List = ALV
Selection Parameters = WE102
Regards,
Shailesh -
In process Inspection Lot Qty and Actual Lot quantity difference.
Hi Experts,
In case of In process Inspection
Scenario : 1. Production Order created, released but before saving the qty is changed.
2. Production Order created released and saved. Then qty is changed in Change Prod order txn.
These scenarios are causing a discrepancy in Inspection Lot Qty and Actual Lot quantity. Is there any method to avoid this ?
This can be made correct in Inspection lot by resetting the sample calculation. But once confirmation has started for Prodn Order (not necessarily QC operation) or RR has been done resetting is not possible.
Is this the std behavior ? Disallowing the resetting once RR done seems OK, but even if any of the operation in Prodn Order is confirmed it still give status error while resetting. Canceling all the confirmation all the way back also does not solve the problem.
Any suggestions ?
Regards
JoeHi
Although your suggestion is valid, it is not practical from user point of view.
Moving this thread to QM forum.
Rgds -
Quantity Tolerance in Invoice Verification
All,
I have an issue in Direct Trading flow. PO qty received at 10,500, sales order qty 10,500, billing document 10,500 and invoice qty at 10,500.05. The system is not allowing me to close the sales order due to the weight discrepancy in logistics invoice.
Is there any customizing available to set a quantity tolerance in Invoice Verification (as the one existing for Amount)?
I tried to check final invoice in the invoice tab of my PO but it did not work : sales order is still "Being processed".
Thanks in advance,
Laurehi,
Your question is little confusing...Do you wanna check the duplicate invoice check...then check SPRO settings here:SPRO >> MM >> LIV >> Check for duplicate invoices...
If you want to have the tolerances applied then check here:
SPRO>> MM >> LIV >> Incoming invoice >> set up vendor specific tolerances...but remember that this will be in terms of amount with respect to that quantity...so if the tolerance is 0% then the amount shd be exactly same...otherwise the system will block the invoice for qty variance...
Hope it helps..
Regards
Priyanka.P -
Discrepency in billing netvalue
Hi Guru's,
I have created an order with quantity 100
Batch no will be entered manually in delivery. 100 is not available from 1 batch so we created delivery using 2 batches no then
we created billing for the delivery butt there is Rs 1 deference in net value of the billing from order net value.
Client do not want this discrepancy to happen.
How to solve this plz give me suggestion.
Thanks in advance
Mastanhi,
just check if the order value determined for that line item has the same condition record value as entered at the delivery with a different batch.
see how the values are flowing from delivery to billing with effect of batch. VTFL.
hope it helps.
Thanks
Sadhu Kishore
Maybe you are looking for
-
Anyone know if you can replace your .me email address for your regular email address? I'm trying to set up my iCloud acct. on my iPhone but the default email adddress is my .me email which I never used and do not know the password for. When I use the
-
I download the xercesImpl-2.6.2.jar file. I want to use all the classes available in the org.apache.html.dom.*. I put the jar file in the jre1.6.0_18\lib\ext folder as well as jdk1.6.0_14\jre\lib\ext folder. But When I try to use the class file avail
-
CAnnot connect to wireless manager
Have attempted to connect to wireless amnager several times, enter "admin" as both login and pw but system keeps looping back to that same screen. Trying to connect blackberry with wireless capability to home system. Tried the button method but that
-
XMII 12.0 on NW 7.1 CE?
I installed the NW 7.1 CE developer preview and installed xMII 12.0 via JSPM. I created my 3 groups, XMII Administrators, XMII Users, and XMII Developers and assigned them to my user. I upgraded my JCO DLLs (Windows XP SP-latest). I restarted NW 7
-
OIM 11g R2: Insufficent Privileges after Enable Database Vault
Hi, i am trying to implement database vault on oim 11g r2 database for a customer proof of concept, but after enable database vault i am got the following error oracle.iam.ui.platform.exception.OIMRuntimeException: IAM-7130125 : Search token caused O