Question on local contracts

Hi friends
In order to create local contracts manually 1.def number range for local contracts 2.def transaction for local contracts PCTR 3.Assign PCTR to CT_PROC_TY. and what else is required
If we are creating local contracts with source of supply i.e bid invitation and sourcing what steps are required.
what i feel is 1.def number range for local contracts 2. def transaction type pctr. 3. Assign PCTR to what attribute and what other steps are required
thanks alot
regards
vinaykrishna

Yes, besides that you need to set up the ALE model view to replicate the data in case of GOA or if you want to create the contract in the backend. Refer the config guide of Strategic sourcing.
Regards, IA

Similar Messages

Local contract and classic scenario

Hi all
A question regarding contracts - and interpretation...
On help.sap.com the following is stated:
SAP Enterprise Buyer, as the central purchasing system, saves the contract data and uses it for local purchase orders and purchase orders of the extended classic scenario.
I interpret this as, if one is using the classic scenario it's not possible to operate with local contracts in the SRM system. Can anyone confirm this?
And if so - any workarounds?
Our dilemma is that we have an extended classic scenario. Some materials are stock materials, and for these materials we are using a BAdi to switch off the extended classic scenario. No contract data is now added to the shopping cart, which I think is due to the classic scenario.
Thanks for your help in advance
;o)
Maria

Maria
If you want the contracts to be in SRM and do not want them to send to Backend, then check this out.
Create a Vendor list for those items in SRM by assigning the local contracts to the vendors.Activate Vendor list for sourcing.
Then local contract data should pick as SOS from the vendor list.
If you can create contracts in Backend for stock material then SC would pick the backend contract as SOS in classic scenario.
Let me know if the above works or not.
PS : Reward points if helpful.
Regards
Jagadish

Local Contracts in SRM

Hi,
I have the following question:
I'm trying to do a call off against a Local (Purchase) Contract but can't seem to get this to happen in the Classic scenario? I've tried to assign the contract line item via the Sourcing Cockpit but it still doesn't reflect the call off against the contract. I've been able to do this in the Extended Classic Scenario. Is this a limitation in the Classic scenario?
Currently on SRM 5.0, Classic scenario.
Any info appreciated.

Hi
local contract is applicable to only srm in extrended classic scenario.
but you can bring r/3 contracts in to srm by reports and the r/3 contracts will be available toy you and you can lock the backend contract at item level.
regards
muthu

Invoice for Local contract.

The process in ECC system 1) create a contract 2) Create Release Order 3) Post the invoice against Release order, we won't be able to post the invoice against the contract .
In SRM system , is it possible to post the invoice against the local contract with out creating follow on purchase order. Request feedback from SRM experts
Regards
Mani

Dear Mani,
As we know that contracts are the agreements for future supply and we can not show contract as an asset like inventory (As no goods has been delivered) neither it is a liability until the PO is created and goods delivered.
So in the books of accounts if we create invoice against contract we can not show it on balance sheet.
Therefore, it is not possible to raise the invoice against contract you will have to have PO for the same.
Assign points if answered.
Regards, Ravi

SRM Local Contract Dumps when same material exists in multiple backend systems

Hi All,
We have a scenario of two backend systems connected to SRM system.
Materials are created with the same number in both the ECC systems and replicated to SRM system .
Materials are updated in COMM_PRODUCT in SRM with the respective logical system.
But when we creating a local contract by adding the same material system is throwing a dump .
system is not able to recognize the logical system for the material and material group linked.
Please let me us know if you have faced any such issue
Thanks
Rajesh

Hi Rahul Nazar,
RFC connections are working fine for both the logical systems.
Please find the dump details below :
Error application is coming up.
20140429
TP418
161636
r3cap
https://r3cap.XXXXXXXXXXXXX.net:8101/sap/bc/webdynpro/sapsrm/wda_l_fpm_oif
GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED
Field symbol has not yet been assigned.
Function: CONVERSION_EXIT_PRID1_OUTPUT of program SAPLCOM_PR_CONVERSION
Method: ADD_FROM_BLANK_LINES of program /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_DOTM_CTR_ITEMCP
Method: PROCESS_BLANK_LINES of program /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_DO_MAPPER====CP
Method: PROCESS_BLANK_LINES of program /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_MAP_DO_TREE==CP
Method: /SAPSRM/IF_CLL_MAPPER~UPDATE of program /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_DOTM_CTR_ITEMCP
Method: FIRE_EVENT_UPDATE of program /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_XO_MAPPER====CP
Method: /SAPSRM/IF_CLL_XO_MAPPER~FIRE_EVENT_UPDATE of program /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_XO_MAPPER====CP
Method: /SAPSRM/IF_CLL_BO_MAPPER~FIRE_EVENT_REFRESH of program /SAPSRM/CL_CH_WD_BO_MAPPER====CP
Method: ONACTIONON_ENTER of program /1BCWDY/P8BFGBR5XZLSDCQM136Z==CP
Method: IF_WDR_VIEW_DELEGATE~WD_INVOKE_EVENT_HANDLER of program /1BCWDY/P8BFGBR5XZLSDCQM136Z==CP
Thanks
Rajesh Kalva

Local contract for service master doesn't picked in PDP

Dear Experts,
We are on SRM 7.0 and in using PDP Scenario. Having created a local contract for service master which is released and acting as a source of supply when creating the shopping cart for the service master, however when purchase requisition is being transferred to the SRM system agains the same service master the shopping cart in available in the sourcing cockpit instead of picking the existing contract. Set the option as "sourcing carried without source of supply" , however this scenario works well for material master but not for service master, please advise me on this fix or any limitation in this version.
Thanks and Regards,
Venkata Koppisetti.

Wrong assignment of P org with P grp is the route cause, found the error and rectified which is working fine.
Thanks and Regards,
Venkata Koppisetti.

Question to local workbench request

Hi,
I have question to local workbench request. If this kind of request is released, is it stored also in the local transport folder (/usr/sap/trans...) in the file system? Or where I can find it?
Thanks for your answers.

Hello Andreas,
A local workbench TR or for that matter any local Transport Request is one which has no target group/target system assigned to it and hence even after releasing it the changes stored in it don't get moved to other systems.
A local TR when released does not get stored in /usr/sap/trans folder as data and co-files for local TRs don't get created.
A released local TR can be viewed in SE01 transaction in SAP.
Please let us know what is your exact requirement with local workbench TR? May be we will be able to help you out with that.
PS award points if you found this answer useful.
Regards.
Ruchit.

Local contract in SRM

Hi ,
What is the functionality of Basic Contract check box in the local contract. I understand that only header data is maintained and there won't be any line items . then how this contract is useful in the procurement chain and in which scenarios these contracts are made use......
Regards
Mani

Hi Mani,
Here are the benefit of basic contracts :
- conditions apply to a vendor whatever item you buy
- can be used in contract hierarchy : often at the top level
- if the basic contract is assigned to a PO item, the contract conditions applies to the price calculation.
- you have contract reporting and released value.
-in the sourcing cockpit, a basic contract can be found in the source determination. (only if the PO or invoice vendor is the contract vendor).
Please be aware that you can't distribute basic contract to SAP backends and you can't negociate header contract in SAP bidding engine.
Kind regards,
Yann

Local Contract management (PCTR)

Hi Friend,
Business scenario: Extended Classic Scenario (ECS)
We planning to implement local contract management (PCTR) in SRM7.0 and also contract should available to requester to create SC and after Purchase order gets created.
Could you please tell us the configuration and technical details.
Appreciate your valuable inputs.
Thank You!
Shrini

Hi,
Just to remind; as you are impelementing Local Contract Management; contracts you will create, will not be updated in ECC.
You can create contract using puchaser log in. Assign role u2018operational purchaseru2019 to the purchaser.
You will see contract (material) in Source of Supply of SC.
Regards,
yaniVy
reward if helps

Local Contract and GOA

Hi,
In which technical scenario we can use
1)GOA
2)Local Contract
3)Both.
THANKS,
Venky

1)GOA -
In classic for all your source of supply as distributed contract for your PR,PO and SC
IN ECS only for backend direct materials . this can be used only in backends but this only for your backend.
2)Local Contract only ECS
3)Both.-Yes
Local contract for srm procurement
GOA for backend .
br
muthu

Consume local contracts with extended claissc scenario

Hello,
We are implementing SRM 7 stack 10 with ECS. We are connected to one R3 4.7 backend.
Since local PO will be replicated to the backend, is that possible to consume local contracts with that scenario?
Could there be a problem with the GR if there is no contract in R3?
At the moment we can not manage to consume SRM contracts.
Thanks in advance

Hi ,
There can be various reasons why a local contract is not populated as a source of supply for requirements in extended classic. Ideally, local contract are always porposed as a source of supply unless
1. company codes are not identical.
2. Purchase organization of requirement does not match with any of the released authorized purchase organization.
3. product ID or product category are identical.
4. Delivery Plant mentioned in the requirement should not excluded in the contract and so on.
Check all the points and see if the contract is eligible enough to get popped as a source of supply.
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan

SRM Local Contracts - Price Conditions

Hi,
We are trying to extract the price conditions from the SRM Local Contract line items, with the Condition Type, Valid From, Valid To, Amount, Price Unit, Unit. This is to allow us to track the changes in contract prices.
If you have any experience of this, or know which SRM tables we need to be extracting from it would be greatly appreciated! We already have the Contract Header and Line information from CRMD_ORDERADM_H, CRMD_ORDERADM_I, BBP_PDHGP and BBP_PDIGP. Where are the conditions stored? And are there any extractors planned for this in the future? It would be very useful standard content.
Thanks.

Hi
Few BADIs to refer using SE18 Transaction (Please read standard documentation provided by SAP on them )
BBP_IMS_CONTACT Changes the Contract for the E-Mail
BBP_CTR_INIT_UP Contracts and GOAs to SRM
BBP_CHANGE_SF_CTR Change Smart Form for Contract Output
BBP_CND_UI_CTRL BBP Conditions: UI Control
BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE Exit when Creating a Contract in the Backend System
BBP_CTR_INIT_UP BAdI to upload Contracts and GOAs to SRM
BBP_CTR_MAIL_BADI BAdI for Changes Regarding Sending Mails
BBP_CTR_MASS_BADI Implementation of Mass Change Parameters
BBP_CTR_STAT BAdI to enable changes in the contract status
BBP_PROCESS_CTR Process Smart Form with Changed Interface
BBP_QA_REDETERM_CTR Redefine the Contract to be Used (Quota Arrangement)
Please go through these links ->
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/58/2a8442a07b0e53e10000000a155106/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/6d/1e8442a07b0e53e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/fd/dc804258544b76e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Regards
- Atul

Local Contracts

HI,
We are creating GOAs from Bids and distributing to backend after approvla process.
Our new requirement is to create local contracts based on certain agreement types.
Can we create local contracts when we distribute GOA by activating the BADI (After approval)? Is there any other better way to achieve this without disturbing the above business process?
Please let me know. Points will be awarded for useful answers.
Thanks,
Pradeep

Hi Pradeep,
GOA distribution and Backend Contracts are different. You are looking for a combination within. This is functionality is going to be available in SRM 7.0.
Anyhow, I would not try to combine both in a lower release via modification of GOA distribution. Everything you need is available by standard and can be customized via the doc type functionality (I do not recommend to use the Org Model for follow on doc determination as it is only allows one document and makes the process inflexible) and you do not change the existing behaviour.
Yes, it is a different transaction, but the screens are the same. and quite logical. So from a creation perspective users only need to know, which doc type to choose, e.g. GOA or LOC (or how you want to name it to make it conveniate for the users) and in which transaction to find the contract - GOA under "Create Global Outline Agreement" and LOC under "Create Contact". It is a pretty simple and proven appoach.
Cheers,
Claudia

Question about Local Variables (Multiple answers welcomed!)

A couple of questions about Local Variables
1. Programmers always say: “Do not abuse of Local Variables”. I’d like to know, when and where Local variable are most efficiently used?
2. If I have to create a couple of local variables, is there anyway to “clone” them without going through the repetitive “create/local variables” mouse click each time? (When I try to copy and paste, it creates a new variables instead of the one that I am trying to reproduce)
3. Which is faster in execution: Updating a variable through a) writing to property node/value or b) through local variable
Everyone’s input is welcomed, so if this question is already answered, please
feel free to add additional comments/answers!

1. Use Local Variables in user interface code and no where else. The only exception is using a local variable of a cluster output to define the datatype for a bundle by name node.
2. You can drag copy them then right click to get to a menu of all the currently defined controls and indicators on the VI.
3. B. The problem with A is that it forces a thread switch to the user interface thread--which can take time if you aren't already in it, and it's a very convoluted process under the hood. NI's advice never update indicator values through a property node unless you absolutely, positively can't figure out some other way of doing it.
Mike...
Certified Professional Instructor
Certified LabVIEW Architect
LabVIEW Champion
"... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

Local Contract not created

Dear all,
there is a strange behaviour in a SRM 5.0 System.
We implemented BADI Determine Logsys for creation of local contracts in R/3. The process works fine from the Bidding Engine, but the contract is not created via the contract transaction. Looking into the details the system does not give the contract the logical system where to post the contract.
Any infos on this issue in the group?
Cheers,
Claudia

Hi Claudia,
it looks like SAP told you what the normal way is to create contracts in the backend directly: from sourcing or from bidding. take a look in the configuration guide for SRM 5, page 60: [click here (login to SAP)|https://websmp205.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700002897362004E/CG_Sourcing5.pdf]
Configuration guide, page 61:
(III) When creating an operational contract or a global outline agreement from the
contract management application of SAP Enterprise Buyer the system does not use
BAdI B1. The implementation of the BAdIs B2/B3 is optional.
B1 is the determine_logsys badi.
Regards,
Robin

Question on local contracts

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for