R/S Internal Order Requisitions in ASCP 11.5.9

Have a recommendation to reschedule an internal order. Fully realize that this has no impact on the internal sales order. Would like to see the internal requisition get rescheduled. Sometimes it works...and most times the internal requisition does not get updated. Thoughts?

You are correct. Its a known issue and I dont see any resolution happening on this.
ASCP plans do create reschedule and cancellations of IR's but these CANNOT be released successfully to the source instance if the IR has been interfaced to OM. As soon as the ISO is created, the IR cannot be changed in purchasing and reschedules will fail.
I think in R12 the same has been overcome in Distribution planning alone (DRP) and not even in ASCP if I am correct.

Similar Messages

Min/Max Internal Orders 1 Requisition

We are running Min/Max planning to replenish stock in an "Emergency Warehouse" organization. The requisition import kicks off internal orders to a replenishment organization. The planner in the replenishment organization would like one order for each Min/Max run. The requisition group-by default in Purchasing parameters is vendor yet we are still seeing one unique requisition for each item thus creating one unique internal sales order per item. Thoughts?

Stick wrote:
The requisition group-by default in Purchasing parameters is vendor yet we are still seeing one unique requisition for each item thus creating one unique internal sales order per item. Thoughts?In this case the requisitions will not be grouped by Vendor because the supply source is Inventoy which is creating internal requisitions and not purchasing requisition (source is Supplier/ Vendor).
It is important to know how you are importing requisitions and what value is specified for Group By parameter during import. The value you setup in Purchasing Options defaults in the Requisition Import request parameter screen, but this can be changed before submission. So it is possible in your case that requisitions are imported using a different group by than what is specified in Purchasing Options.
From the list of different group by options available (All, Buyer, Category, Item, Supplier) you can probably use 'Location' during requisition import.
Location: Group requisition lines for each delivery location on a separate requisition.
But this will not guarantee 100% success because:
- If you import requisitions with source as INV then those can include requisitions from different INV sources generated from Reorder, Kanban etc having same delivery location. In that case all those requisitions will be grouped under a single header having same location.
- there may be different users running requisition import manually and some may forget to change this group by parameter (defaulted from purchasing options) while importing Min-Max planned requisitions (again they cannot segregate Min-Max, they can just specify INV as source)
A better solution would be to use the oracle provided custom hook (po_reqimp_pkg.post_validate_user_extensions) for requisition import to populate the GROUP_CODE column in PO_REQUISITIONS_INTERFACE table. The logic inside the hook should identify the rows in the interface table generated from each run of Min-Max and populate a unique value for all those rows in the GROUP_CODE column. You need a small piece of code to be added inside the hook.
You can also use REQ_NUMBER_SEGMENT1 column in the interface table to populate an unique value for all rows you want to group together. But in this case the value you specify will become the requisition number if there are no conflicts with the requisition number rule. Both these column, when populated, have precedence over Group by parameter. 1st priority GROUP_CODE (if populated). If GROUP_CODE is not populated then it checks REQ_NUMBER_SEGMENT1. If this is also blank then it uses Group By parameter.
Thanks
Supro

Budgeting through Internal Order - Issues in Purchase Requisition

Hi All,
I have posted the issue in ERP Matyerial Management Forum also, but since this has a lot to do with CO-Internal Order, so posting the same here.
Objective: We want to activate Commitment Update and budgeting for Capital purchases thrugh Internal Order. Budgeting is done for IO.
For the budgeting to get activated in Purchase requisition, Internal Order tagged to the Asset should be present/seen in the PR.
For PR with Account assignment Cat as 'A', I am not able to see the Internal order (mapped to the asset) in PR. The field 'Internal Order' in PR is coming BLANK despite the fact that the Asset used in the PR has been tagged to a valid Internal Order (of the Object Class - Investment, with Commitment update activated).
What other setting is missing?
Pls note the following:
1) Account assignment cat 'A' has been set to DISPLAY CO/PP order ( T code - OME9)
Issue is that this field in the PR is NOT getting populated at all.
2) Commitment management, Availability Control have also been activated in the system
. Internal Order status management has also been checked.
Any help in this respect will be highly appreciated
Thanks
Gayathri

Hi Gayatri,
when you are saying"budgeting for Capital purchases thrugh Internal Order",how do you use account assignment category "A"?
if your requirement is budgeting for capital purchases through IO then you should use account assignment category in respective PR.Automatically it will control budget/commitment wrt those internal orders.
Hope this helps you.
Ashok

Internal order purchase requisition

Hi everyone,
I'm testing a purchase requisition for an IO object but it appears an error that the GL account cannot be used (please correct).
I'm new here so please help.. thanks.

Enter only internal order. It is not required to enter the GL account. The GL account will be automatically determined based on the material (valuation class in material master).
Sangram

Internal Order - Purchase Order -Purchase Requisition

Hi,
Can anyone please help me out with understanding how costs are posted to an internal order from Purchase Order/Purchase Requsition? How to make commitments via PO/PR? And how is it settled onto an asset?
Sorry its too much to ask. If anyone can guide me to a document explaining this online somewhere.
Thanks,
M

Hi,
Whenever you assign your PO/PR items to be issued on internal order, you will see the posting on it. You will have to activate commitment management in CO (OKKP). After the GR/IR process is done, and the cost are on I/O, you can settle it to an asset. In order to do so, you have to define a settlement profile for order type, create a settlement rule in the order (KO02) and run the settlement (KO88/KO8G).
Regards,
Eli

GR/IR -Internal Order

I have done the following process:
a) Created purchase requisition with account assignment catedory A and assigned AUC # and Internal Order #.
Committments are getting booked at internal order. Looks fine.
b) Created purchase order with reference of PR. Committment is transfered from PR to PO at internal order. Looks
fine.
c) When I am doing a GR for that AUC with ref to PO, AUC number and internal order # is assigned in GR document. In
the accounting doc, AUC is getting debit and GR/IR account is getting credit.But neither internal order is showing
up in the accounting document nor its updating committments at internal order.
What's missing? How can i get the GR updated to internal order.
Thanks

Hi,
Please check all these are in sink or not?
The acquisition transaction types in Asset Accounting have to be designated as relevant to the budget.
The APC asset balance sheet accounts have to be defined as statistical cost elements.
The APC asset balance sheet accounts have to have a field status group that should allow additional account assignment to orders
Regards,
Murali

Budgeting thru Internal Order with Account assignment category 'A'

Dear All
I want Budgeting thru Internal Order with Account assignment category 'A'
i.e
Created Assets with Tcode As01
Created Internal Order and assigned budget amount to IO with Tcode KO01 and KO22
Created Purhcase Requisition with Account assignment catg as 'A' i.e asstes. Also given Internal Order No and Asset code in PR.
Releases PR with ME54N
Created Purchase Order with Account assignemnt catg as 'A' i.e asstes. In Purchase Order it displays Internal Order No. and Asset code which i have given in PR in Account assignemnt tab on Item level
Released Purchase Order.
Now i am checking budget detail in Tcode : S_ALR_87013019 -> List: Budget/Actual/Commitments , Here it gives message , "No line item were selected " in Commitment line items.
Actually my requirement is , i want budgeting thru internal order and want to use Account assignment category as 'A' (Assets) in PR and PO.
Why it's not showing detail in report S_ALR_87013019 .
What is solution for my requirement. Is it possible with some configuration or by other options.
Thanx & Regards
Swati Shah

Hi Swati,
You can do this in Asset Accounting. By standard MIGO Posting Date is taken as capitalization date for asset. You can configure to make it 'Document Date'.
So, whenever user is posting thru MIGO, he will have better control on deciding capitalization date by inputting appropriate date in Document Date Field in MIGO.
Check this thread..
Re: Depreciation start date for asset thru MIGO
Regards,
Sayujya

Budget was exceeded on internal order

Dear gurus
my client facing a problem in internal order.
At the time of creation of purchase requisition we are getting an error that is "budget was exceeded on internal order number 200336".
But in T.code S_ALR_87013019 the amount is available
please help us we are facing same problems in 6/7 orders also.
waiting for your reply
Regards ,
Dipti

Hi,
Eli's response is fine. Solution given by Eli will resolve ur issue.
Longback i had same problem, after execution of KO31, issue got resolved.
wish you good luck.
regards,
A.Prasad

Problem with Purchase order (requisition)

Hello friends,
I have a problem during creating a PO also PO requisition. During my work, the system is reporting this error message:
"Budget for all Years under year-based commitment update of value type Purchase order".
I thing the problem is caused by some wrong year end closing activities or by the budget.
I am hopeless. Thanks for your help,
Charlie

If you getting reqs against the internal order then it is related to controlling mans you have to check the settings for controlling which i have suggeted

Budget Process (Linked the maintenance Order into Internal Order) in EAM

Dear Experts,
Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM & FICO module live w.e.f. 2007 (PM not live)
Process Managed thru Internal Order (Order Type: RPMT)
Budget managed through Investment Management (IM); Budget is directly entered against the IO using transaction IM52
Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM, FICO & PM module live (PM went live in 2010)
It was proposed to assign budget against each Maintenance Order. Since the number of maintenance orders being used is very high, it was decided to link the MO & IO so that budget will be assigned to the IO and when the MO is settled against the IO, the budget in IO can be deducted accordingly. The proposed process to assign budget in Internal Order against each Maintenance Order are given below-:
1.)     In EAM process one can plan/procure material and External Services only when the Maintenance Order is created & released but practically it has to be planned long before any Maintenance Activity (Maintenance Order to be linked with the estimate so that PO can be created against the estimate).
2.)     The no. of Maintenance Order generated in EAM Module is very large as Maintenance order is created for almost each and every maintenance activity. It is cumbersome to allocate the budget to each and every maintenance order. There should be a single estimate for maintenance activity (as in MM module) and that should be linked to maintenance order so that the actual cost of Indent/Service Entry Sheet can be deducted automatically from the estimate (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
3.)      While doing return Indent the cost of return material is not being added to the maintenance order automatically (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
4.)      If Material & External Services not planned in the maintenance order (estimate), the user must be able to do that through Internal Order (estimate), hence the Internal Order must be link to the Maintenance Order. They should able to record the planned & actual cost in the maintenance Order.
Process followed:
1.) Created Internal Order in KO01 for Repair & Maintenance Order Type
     Assigned budget to Internal Order thru IM52
2.) Created PM order and assigned Internal order against Settlement Order in tab
     u2018Locationu2019 and in Settlement Rule with 100%. In this Section attach the Internal
     Order with selection type u2018ORDu2019.
3.) Released both orders and issue the Material for particular Operation and then
     determine the Cost for material .After that performed MIGO for consumption of
     materials.
4.) Settled the PM order in KO88.
     Settlement process was successfully saved.
Problem faced:
After posting the goods movement (against each Maintenance Order) and settlement of the maintenance order against IO, we still find the budget assigned to the IO is not consumed/deducted.
1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
    immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
    maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly
    added to the available budget of internal order.
3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by
    maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal
    order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
4. It must not be allowed to create reservation from the internal order of order type
     RPMT.
5. In case of external service in the maintenance order, the unit of
     measure in the requisition is set to u201CD (days)u201D by default. System does not allow
     changing the unit of measure in the requisition (it should allow to change the unit
     of measure or set the unit of measure u201CJOBu201D).
6.) When the material is issued from the store through reservation generated in
     maintenance order, system does not check for budget in Internal Order
     (estimate)/Maintenance Order while issuing material from store.
Thanks & Regards
Deepak Soni

Hi,
1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
As per the standard system budgeting is done against the actual cost only. And until you settle your order the actual cost from
maint order are not getting transfered to IO. Once they are transfered system is checking for the budget.
2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly added to the available budget of internal order.
This is similar to first point, when you return goods there will be negative cost on the order, this has to be settled until that system will not compare the IO budget with maintenance order actual cost.
3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
The budget you have assigned is at IO, how can system will check the budget while issueing goods for maintenance order. We may have to develop or use some user exit over here. Which will trigger checking of budget from the settlement receiver IO for that maintenance order.
I think you may have to go for development. These are my observations from my experience.
Regards,
NNR

Segregate internal ordered items from purch. order items for the i-pro user

We want to know if there are any Oracle i-Procurement implementations that have segregated the internally ordered items via an Order Management sales order from items ordered on a PO (purchase order). We have considered three possible paths to purse. 1) Table of Contents: this seems to not work because you can only connect a Group at the Category level not item level, 2) Multiple responsibilities one for Inventory and one for drop ship: This is not acceptable to the user. 3) Requisition Template.
We attempted to implement this by creating two i-Pro stores named Main and Inventory Only. Our design defined that these stores be associated with a catalog for each group of item. We interpreted that the "Include items without suppliers in this catalog" flag in the Catalog definition would select those items that are stockable. However, the logic behind this flag does not consider the item attributes/Sourcing Rules set at the ORG level. Our company has two Orgs named INV for inventory and DEV for our service organization. For stockable items the items are coded Inventory Sourced in the DEV item master and the sourcing assigment is linked to a sourcing rule which is internal (that is, get from INV org). The items are coded Supplier Sourced in the INV item master and the sourcing rule is a Blanket. Thus, our inventory items were not included in the the catalog even though they were sourced internally at the DEV org because of the blanket sourcing rule in the INV org.
Thank you, Ned

Meera,
Which version of SBO are you using 2005 or 2007?
I don't think Serial numbers can help in this scenario. There is no hard allocation or blocking possible using Serial numbers.
This is the Work around I am thinking about.
Set the items to be Batch Managed - On Every Transaction
When performing Goods Receipt, enter the Sales Order Number as the Batch Number
When creating the delivery, using SBO_SP_TransactionNotification we can easily check the Batch of the Item being selected and verify it with the BaseRef of Delivery lines to match with Sales Order number.
If the numbers don't match we can warn user with message, "The items batch reserved for Sales Order xyz"
Even if you make a mistake when entering the batch number same as Sales Order number when doing a goods receipt. It can still be traced and blocked during delivery.
Hint: The Batch table records the Goods Receipt transaction along with the BaseDocument number, Base Ref, etc
If you decide to go this route, I could help you further.
Let me know
Suda

Internal order discription in source doc

Hi
Is it possible to have the description of the internal order to appear on the source document (Cheque Payment Voucher, Cash Payment Voucher or Material Requisition Note).
If so pls advice on that...
Thanx.
K

Hey Felipe,
You must have chosen Mexican Peso as Internal Order currency, because when you settle the order then Order gets credited in the object currency i.e. Peso. Moreover, if you have maintained OB22, then Balance Sheet account where Order has been settled would show all Parallel currency in BSEG. or FBL3N.
or change the order currency.
might help you.......
Chintan Joshi.

Assigning an Internal Order to a Purchase Requisistion

Hello,
Probably not an ABAP question but I have noticed that most(if not all) question regarding PR's are directed here.
Anyways my question is quite simple, is there a way to assign an Internal Order to a Purchase Requisition. I know there is an Account Assignment where the Fixed Asset is entered in the PR but some of the Internal Orders arent even fixed assets (or assets for that matter as some are overhead costs).
Thank you everyone and good day.

Hi Chad,
when you create a purchase requisition (transaction ME51N) pick for your line item the account assignment F (the account assignment is the first field after the item number with the header A).
Then you can assign in the item details an order number (tab Account Assignment).
Regards,
Claus

Internal order derivation from SO to PR

Hello all,
I have created a sales order, by giving CO object as Internal order. When I am creating purchase requisition with reference to sales order, it is not picking internal order, it is picking only profit center. How to customize in order to derive internal order in Purchase Requisition. In the account assignment category, the field "CO/PP order" is in display staus.
Thank you for your help.
Thanks
Ram

Hello friends,
It is not yet resolved. Can you provide suggestions?
Thanks
Ram

Internal Order Assigned to - Report

Hi Friends,
Is there any standard report for checking the internal order for which its is assigned to. Ex. Purchase Order, Asset transactions and for some custom programs etc.
Regards,
Anil

Hi Anil,
We can devide Internal order transactions into 3 types
                      Planning   - Report : KOBP
                      Commitment-Report : KOB2
                      Actual   - Report : KOB1
Purchase requisitions and purchase orders comes under Commitment
You can get Purchase orders in ME2K
You can view S_ALR_87013010 Report for Internal orders drill down by period wise .
Krishna

R/S Internal Order Requisitions in ASCP 11.5.9

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for