Receiver determination(or Interface determination) and conditional routing

I have a flat file to flat file scenario. Based on the input file content, I want to route data to the receiver.
My source flat file contains several IDOC details. Assume two fields FIELD1 and FIELD2 in different segments of the IDOC. My requirement is if FIELD1 of an IDOC = "US" and FIELD2 of the same IDOC = "CA", then that IDOC's details needs to be passed to the receiver.
I have implemented the above condition at interface determination.
But the problem is:
Assume there are 3 idocs in the input file.
FIELD1 of IDOC[1] = 'US' and FIELD2 of IDOC[1] = 'GL'
FIELD1 of IDOC[2] = 'UK' and FIELD2 of IDOC[2] = 'EN'
FIELD1 of IDOC[3] = 'BR' and FIELD2 of IDOC[3] = 'CA' .
Now none of the IDOCs in the input satisfy my requirement and hence the message mapping should not be called at all. But in my case its failing because FIELD1 of IDOC[1] and FIELD2 of IDOC[3] together are satisfying the condition and hence the message mapping is called.
But I need to check this condition IDOCwise. Both the conditions to be satisfies in the same IDOC.
I am thinking that contexts are not being taken care.. It just see the whole file together and not IDOCwise.
Can someone help me on the same. Please let me know if more information is required.
Thanks,
Shobha

>
Shobha HB wrote:
> I have a flat file to flat file scenario. Based on the input file content, I want to route data to the receiver.
>
> My source flat file contains several IDOC details. Assume two fields FIELD1 and FIELD2 in different segments of the IDOC. My requirement is if FIELD1 of an IDOC = "US" and FIELD2 of the same IDOC = "CA", then that IDOC's details needs to be passed to the receiver.
>
> I have implemented the above condition at interface determination.
>
> But the problem is:
> Assume there are 3 idocs in the input file.
> FIELD1 of IDOC[1] = 'US' and FIELD2 of IDOC[1] = 'GL'
> FIELD1 of IDOC[2] = 'UK' and FIELD2 of IDOC[2] = 'EN'
> FIELD1 of IDOC[3] = 'BR' and FIELD2 of IDOC[3] = 'CA' .
>
> Now none of the IDOCs in the input satisfy my requirement and hence the message mapping should not be called at all. But in my case its failing because FIELD1 of IDOC[1] and FIELD2 of IDOC[3] together are satisfying the condition and hence the message mapping is called.
>
> But I need to check this condition IDOCwise. Both the conditions to be satisfies in the same IDOC.
>
> I am thinking that contexts are not being taken care.. It just see the whole file together and not IDOCwise.
>
> Can someone help me on the same. Please let me know if more information is required.
>
> Thanks,
> Shobha
The ideal solution to your scenario is to redesign the interface as below;
1. Receive the file.
2. Do a 1: N mapping (this should split your message into multiple Messages)
3. On this message you can do the required check. Now only the required field for the particular IDoc will be part of the check and it will not mix with other Idocs.
Will this do? Else please provide more details

Similar Messages

  • Receiver determination Vs Interface determination

    Hi Experts,
          What is the difference between Receiver determination and Interface determination?
    In both the case we specify sender -> outbound interface -> Receiver Service -> Interface mapping
    Can't we use only interface mapping? Why SAP is providing these two determinations?
    Thanks
    Gopal

    Hi,
    ><i>In both the case we specify sender -> outbound interface -> Receiver Service - Interface mapping</i>
    In receiver determination you only mention the Sender Service, Sender Interface and Reciever Service. You do not mention the Inbound Interafce and interface mapping. You do this in the Interface Determination.
    The split between Receiver Determination and Interfacedetermiantion is so that you can add send the same message to Multiple Receivers and then fior each of the receivers , if needed you can add multiple Inbound Interafces / mappings!!
    And you can add multiple conditions as well!! makes sense to me!
    regards
    Bhavesh

  • Hp photosmart 7520 - can fax, get calls but not receive fax with bundoed service and wireless router

    I finally got the printer set up to my wireless router and am able to fax and receive calls but now I can't send a fax.
    I have a bundled service phone, internet and cabl;e with voice mail.
    I have reduced the number of rings to 2 and turned off automatic answer.  ready to pull my hair out!!
    HP tech service was no help and neither was the cable company.  Got this far on my own but hit a wall!
    any thoughts?

    Hello @mull274 , and welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience!
    I see you are running into fax issues.  I would like to help.
    I would recommend performing a power reset on the printer.  Disconnect the power cord from the printer and the power outlet, then wait 60 seconds. After 60 seconds, plug the printer back in. Ensure you plug the printer directly to a wall outlet. Make sure to bypass any sort of surge protector or power bar.
    I would also recommend this document on Fax Sending Fails Intermittently.
    Good luck and please let me know the results of your troubleshooting steps. Thank you for posting on the HP Forums!
    Please click “Accept as Solution " if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks" for helping!
    Jamieson
    I work on behalf of HP
    "Remember, I'm pulling for you, we're all in this together!" - Red Green.

  • Receiver Determination and Interface Determination Condition conflict in ICO

    Hi,
    I found a strange issue today while configuring two receivers using the Receiver and Interface Determination conditions.
    Sender - Proxy Service
    Receiver1 - ReceiverA
    Receiver2 - ReceiverB
    Receiver Determination Condition : When Field1 = 100, message should flow to ReceiverA and ReceiverB
    Interface Determination Condition (ReceiverA) : When Field1=100 and Field2=50 message should flow to a specific interface in ReceiverA
    There is no Interface Determination condition for ReceiverB, for all messages having Field1=100, it should go to ReceiverB.
    Test Scenarios:
    1) Field1=100, Field2=50 : Message flows successfully to ReceiverA and ReceiverB
    2) Field1=100, Field2=89 : Message fails to process from ECC itself throwing Interface Determination not found error. Ideally this is a positive scenario for ReceiverB and it should send the message to ReceiverB without any errors. But, this did not happen in this case
    I tried the same by configuring the conditions completely in Receiver Determination itself without using the Interface Determination, it worked perfectly fine. But, just wanted to understand that if this is an expected behavior.

    Hi Sherin,
    As there are two receivers Receiver A and Receiver B.You need to create two bussiness components and two communcication channels for two receivers and one Reciver Determination, two Interface Determination,two Receiver Agreement.In Receiver Determination you need to keep the below and condition.
    In the above screenshot the two receiver are Receiver B and Receiver C and Field 1 is Key_Value and Field2 is Emp_ID.
    If the Key_Value=100 and Emp_ID =22 then the message should go to both the receivers B & C by keeping the following AND condition
    If the Key_Value=100 and Emp_ID is not equal to 22 then the message should go only to Receiver B by keeping the following condition
    You need not keep any condition in Interface Determination just create 2 Interface determination for two receivers.
    Hope this helps you.
    Thanks,
    Durga.

  • Need of creating receiver determination and interface determination

    what is the need of creating interface determination where as providing all the details in Receiver determination?

    Hi,
    The loose coupling between the Interface mapping and receiver determination have provided the compatibility for reusability.
    The Interface determination maintained and just linked to receiver determination so you could have multiple receiver determinations with common interface determination or vice-versa.
    If you provide all the information in receiver determination then, it would be very dfficult to have the various mappins for multiple receivers maintained in receiver determination.
    Interface determination is applied at runtime to all messages to be processed. Thus from security point of view of transaction of data. its preferable.
    Thanks
    Swarup

  • Interface Determination causing issue in Receiver Determination

    Hi
    I am having an issue with interface and receiver determination as follows:
    - Inbound message may be sent to two receivers.
    - Message gets sent to first receiver, fails during interface determination. There are multiple inbound interfaces found based on a set of XPATH conditions. This creates an error 'Inbound interface found more than once for outbound interface '. That is itself is <b>not </b>the issue.
    - Issue is that the message is stopped from going to the other receiver even if there are no issues in the interface determination for that receiver.
    Is there a way to resolve this? Appreciate any help. Thx, Duncan

    Again, thanks for the replies.
    <b>MONI for RD</b>
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Start without given receiver</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Classic Receiver Determination via Rules.</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for rule line no. 1</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">...create rule engine</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">...call rule engine for Condition %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice")% EX and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% CE COSTCENTRE or %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice")% EX and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% CE INTERPLANT or %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice")% EX and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% CE INTERPLANT_ONESTEP or %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice")% EX and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% CE INTRAPLANT or %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice")% EX and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% CE INTRAPLANT_ONESTEP or %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:receivingAdvice")% EX or %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:inventoryActivityOrInventoryStatus")% EX</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting (new) for Extractor: XP /p2:despatchAdvice</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting values found: 0</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting (new) for Extractor: XP /p2:receivingAdvice</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting values found: 1</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">...valid Receiver with Condition: - GLR430</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for rule line no. 2</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">...call rule engine for Condition %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice")% EX and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% NE COSTCENTRE and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% NE INTERPLANT and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% NE INTERPLANT_ONESTEP and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% NE INTRAPLANT and %CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:despatchAdvice/deliveryNote/referenceIdentification")% NE INTRAPLANT_ONESTEP</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">...invalid Receiver: P_3PL_XML_ME_ODTH - despatchAdviceToE1EDT20</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for rule line no. 3</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">...valid Receiver w/o Condition: P_3PL_XML_ME_ODTH - S_HTTP</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">No Receiver found behaviour: 0</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Number of Receivers:2</Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
    Here, you see that both receivers are found.
    <b>MONI for ID</b>
    <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-02-26T20:06:49Z CET Start of pipeline service processing PLSRVID= PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</Trace>
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Calling pipeline service: PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Reading Pipeline-Service specification...</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T" />
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline service specification (table SXMSPLSRV)</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">PLSRVID = PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">PLSRVTYPE =</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">ADRESSMOD = LOCAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">P_CLASS = CL_ID_PLSRV</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">P_IFNAME = IF_XMS_PLSRV</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">P_METHOD = ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">FL_LOG =</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">FL_DUMMY = 0</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T" />
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) GLR430 WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">...create rule engine</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">...call rule engine for Condition%CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p1:inventoryActivityOrInventoryStatus/inventoryDocumentType")% CE INVENTORY_STATUS</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting (new) for Extractor: XP /p1:inventoryActivityOrInventoryStatus/inventoryDocumentType</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting values found: 0</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">...invalid InbIf: WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) GLR430 WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">...call rule engine for Condition%CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p1:inventoryActivityOrInventoryStatus/inventoryDocumentType")% CE INVENTORY_ACTIVITY</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting (new) for Extractor: XP /p1:inventoryActivityOrInventoryStatus/inventoryDocumentType</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting values found: 0</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">...invalid InbIf: WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) GLR430 WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">...call rule engine for Condition%CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:receivingAdvice/receivingAdviceItemContainmentLineItem/purchaseOrder/documentReference/uniqueCreatorIdentification")% EX</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting (new) for Extractor: XP /p2:receivingAdvice/receivingAdviceItemContainmentLineItem/purchaseOrder/documentReference/uniqueCreatorIdentification</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting values found: 2</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">...valid InbIf with Condition: WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) GLR430 WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">...call rule engine for Condition%CL_SAI_SWF_RULE_ENGINE.MSG_GET(MSG=&_MSG&;NSP=&_NSM&;XPATH="/p2:receivingAdvice/carrier/additionalPartyIdentification/additionalPartyIdentificationValue")% CE SHUTTLE</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting (new) for Extractor: XP /p2:receivingAdvice/carrier/additionalPartyIdentification/additionalPartyIdentificationValue</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">......extracting values found: 1</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">...valid InbIf with Condition: WMMBXY.WMMBID01</Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST">
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Persisting message after plsrv call</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Message-Version = 002</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Message version 002</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Persisting message Status = 014</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Message version 003</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      </SAP:Trace>
    Here, you see that the ID runs for the first receiver. It hits an error because two conditions on the ID for the first receiver are satisfied. However, it then stops rather than allow the processing for the other receiver to continue.
    Any ideas? Thx, Duncan

  • Enhanced Interface Determination in PI 7.1

    Hi All,
    My scenerio will work as follows
    The changes in the process order will triggered by the client system .I will get the already converted XML file.I have used the file adapter in the sender side to pick the file.At the receiver side I am using the  3 custom  BAPIs.I have used 3 message interface instead of multi-mapping as the inbound interfaces.
    The Logic is like that:
    If the Process order status is = 1 then call BAPI 1,if it 2 then call BAPI 2  & call BAPI 3.
    Please tell me the following
    1.Is there Enhanced Interface Detrmination option available in PI 7.1?If so then can I mention  or call 2 BAPIs in one condition over there?Do I need to write ABAP condition?
    2.Is Enhanced interface Determination possible when I have used 3 inbound interfaces instead of multi-mapping?
    3.From my point of view I need the following in my scenerio
      - 3 message mappings(Graphical Mappings),
      - 3 interface mappings,
      - 1 sender agreement,
      - 1 receiver determination,
       -1 interface determination(with 2 conditions in it),
       -3 receiver agreements.
    Am I right?
    4.How many sender and receiver agreements do I need?
    5.Do I need to go for Enhanced  receiver determination?
    Thanks in advance.

    the same status node in the source file on which I will impose check will call the selective inbound interface based on the
    status node.Is it?If so,then do I need to mention anything other than the check condition in XPATH e.g.do I need to mention any
    mapping program or inbound interface (though I dont thing so but I am still confused) ?
    Yes, apart from specifying the condition in the Condition Editor you also should mention the corresponding Inbound Service Interface and Interface Mapping (if any).
    Condition will only cause the execution of that particular line and wont automatically call the mapping/ interface (unless these are specified in the Interface Determination).
    Is XPATH the alternative option in condition editor which can be skipped though I would surely like to go through it as
    much as possible?
    XPATH is the easiest option to specify a condition....other option includes the use of a Context Object.
    So as of now think that you cannot skip XPATH (for this particular requirement).
    Once you become an expert in using a XPATH (which you can in a days period) you can try out for Context Objects.
    Regarding Test Case:
    There is no standard template for this.....i would suggest check with peers in your company.....many a times companies have their own templates for test cases alongwith the possible cases....then referring to those test cases you can build the cases for your scenario. Avoid a direct copy of the test cases.....many wont be relevant for your case.
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Problem in Interface determination for multiple MM

    Hi experts,
    i designed an IDOC to Jdbc scenario.
    The particular thing is that I have TWO message mappings to apply for the same source and same target.
    Hence, I have in my directory two scenarios with :
    - same Reveicer Determination
    - same Interface Determination
    - differents Receiver agreements (i have two Communication Channels)
    In my interface determination, I have configured a standard Interface determination with my two interface mappings to apply.
    My problem is when I send an idoc, the result should be for my two interfaces differents payloads to inject to the database, but I get the same payload for both interfaces with the same namespace...it looks like it only use one Interface mapping instead of both...
    It is driving me crazy...
    Any help would be greatly appreciated
    Kind regards,
    Jamal

    Hi,
    i have the same receiver.
    I do have two interface mappings in my interface determination. The problem is that it uses the same for both interface.
    If I use enhanced ID, i can only specify one Interface mapping.
    What I want :
    - sender A - Message mapping 1 - receiver A
    - and also sender A - Message mapping 2 - receiver A
    when the idoc is sent.
    what I have right now (though my configuration seems to be right) :
    - sender A - Message mapping 1 - receiver A
    - and also sender A - Message mapping 1- receiver A
    Thanks a lots,
    Jamal

  • Abap mapping for content conditions routing in a flat-flat scenario

    Dear Experts.
    I have a flat-flat file scenario. Based on the content of the input file, I need to route data to the receiver.The source flat file will have several IDOC details.
    Assume two fields FIELD1 and FIELD2 in different segments of the IDOC. My requirement is if FIELD1 of an IDOC = "XYZ" and FIELD2 of the same IDOC = "PQR", then this  IDOC's details has to be passed to the receiver.
    I have tried to implement the above condition at interface determination in graphical mapping.
    In the graphical mapping,  the problem is:
    Assuming there are 3 idocs in the input file.
    FIELD1 of IDOC[1] = 'XYZ' and FIELD2 of IDOC[1] = 'PQR'
    FIELD1 of IDOC[2] = 'LMN' and FIELD2 of IDOC[2] = 'RST'
    FIELD1 of IDOC[3] = 'ABC' and FIELD2 of IDOC[3] = 'DEF' .
    Now, if none of the IDOCs in the input file satisfy my requirement,the message mapping should not be called at all. But in my case its failing because FIELD1 of IDOC[1] and FIELD2 of IDOC[3] together are satisfying the condition and hence the message mapping is getting called.
    And I need to check this condition IDOC wise. Both the conditions has to be satisfied in the same IDOC.
    The question is very similar to the one posted by SHOBHA HB. (Topic:Receiver determination(or Interface determination) and conditional routing )
    but, due to complexities in the graphical mapping,  we have decided to go for the ABAP mapping instead.
    Kindly help, by mentioning the steps I should follow for this interface, the logic basically. I already have paths to some basic ABAP mapping documents from SDN, so, kindly refrain from posting general URLS for definition or history of ABAP mapping.
    IF you could guide me on this interface, It would be really helpful.
    regards,
    giri raj

    Hi,
    /people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/02/10/different-types-of-mapping-in-xi
    This document will help you to create ABAP Mapping .
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/xi/3.0/how%20to%20use%20abap-mapping%20in%20xi%203.0.pdf
    How to Use ABAP Mapping in Exchange Infrastructure 3.0 (NW2004)
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5c46ab90-0201-0010-42bd-9d0302591383
    SAP Network Blog: How to call XI ABAP Mapping via RFC
    /people/ricardoandres.maienza/blog/2007/04/06/how-to-call-xi-abap-mapping-via-rfc
    SAP Network Blog: Testing ABAP Mapping
    /people/sameer.shadab/blog/2005/09/29/testing-abap-mapping
    /people/udo.martens/blog/2006/08/23/comparing-performance-of-mapping-programs
    An ad-on
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/09/20/xi-abap-mapping-logs--more-standard-better-visibility
    Regards

  • Receiver and Interface determination

    Hi,
    My senario is File to IDOC and mail.
    The condition here is the count of Idoc generated has to be sent as a mail and the mail has to  be sent only after the IDoc has been generated successfully.
    So i am using two receiver services one is for IDOC and other is for mail and  in one receiver determination I am refering TWO reciver Service without any condition.
    now  i have to use only one interface determination to maintain the order at runtime. so that the interface mapping for mail will be triggered only after the Idoc interfacemapping is successfull.
    but in receiver agreement  i am not able to refer the Receiver channel for Mail. because the receiver service is still poiting to the Idoc Serveice.
    Plz advice.

    Hi!
    I think the above requirement will also work by using a simple BPM. just try with below steps.
    Steps in BPM::
    1. Receive step to receive File from a third party by using File Sender CC.
    2. SEND ASYNCH step to send IDOC generated Structure data.
    3. Before going to next step please find any constant value which will be coming into IDOC from file that
        means for example if your IDOC cotnains any field like ORDER_Generated_By or 
        GENERATED_BY:: AMAR  name is same in all the data that is coming into IDOC remember that Field
        Name name and insert it in the swtich statement condition editor.
    4. Now Insert Switch Condition with 2 branches A & B,
         a) Branch A contains control statement and this branch executes only if the condition statisfies with
            If that IDOC Field lets say name XXXX is equal to constant value AMAR then raise/throws  an alert
            mail by uising Control Step.
        b) In Branch B also you ill be including Control Step but this control Step will says that  MAIL
            INDICATION  No IDOC is generated by using another control step.
    5) Remaining all other configurations like 2 receiver agreements and every thing aare same.
    6) But you need to confgure ALert configuration settings okay.
    You can also achive this by using without BPM.::
    In ID part:: you need to enter a condition in Receiver Determination with two receiver business systems and that condition will be once the IDOC field like XXXXX(generated_by is equal to some constant like AMAR ) then it needs to active the Mail Business System.
    but this would be little but confusion and but u can achive the above requirement by using simple BPM.
    Note:: Only diadvantage will be some performance issue will come if goes through BPM but it works
              very 100 systamatic way because you can review where exactly your Scenario strucks and also
              u can check whether your IDOC generated or not whether mail sent or not in the BPM WORK
               FLOW in the BUSINESS PROCESS ENGINE.
    Regards::
    Amar Srinivas Eli

  • INTERFACE DETERMINATION AND RECEIVER DETERMINATION DOUBTS???

    Hi Team
    I am having doubts regarding the Interafce Determination and the receiver determination. In pur landscape in our objects, some times i am seeing a Condition is being defined in the Interafce Determination  and sometimes  am seeing a Condition is being defined in the receiver determination . could you please let me know the differences between the above two.
    thanx in advance.

    Hi Nabhinav,
    Condtions in receiver determination - These conditions are evaluated and executed to determine the receivers for this incoming message.
    Condtions in Interface determination - These conditions are evaluated and ececuted to determine the Interface mapping to be called in order to map the source message to the target message.
    Please take a loot at these links for more details:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/26/5ccd3bb4560f01e10000000a11402f/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi711/helpdata/en/48/ce2a8e3a8e5430e10000000a42189b/content.htm
    Also, search the SDN before posting you query.
    Regards, Gaurav.

  • Receiver Determination and Interface Determination

    Hi,
    Please, can anyone explain what is the concept of 'Receiver determination' and 'Interface Determination'?
    Thanks,
    Harikumar. S

    Hi,
    >>>>Receiver determination
    its about finding the receiver system for particular source system and outbound interface.
    Suppose,you want to send data from file->XI->SAP and CRM based on some condition
    in this scenario you need to determine whether to send file data to SAP or CRM system,this decision you will do in Receiver determination
    in Receiver determination screen you need to provide the following details
    1.Source system(ex: File system)
    2.Outbound Interface(File Message Interface)
    3.condition and receiving system(ex:if some x field value in source payload is 1 go to SAP elseif '0' go to CRM system)
    >>>>>>Interface Determination
    suppose in above scenario you determined the receiver i.e SAP,you will have number of IDOCs (Inbound Interfaces)in SAP.
    so to which IDOC you will send file data?This decision you will make in Interface determination(we can it as Inbound Interface determination).if you find the IDOC is CREMAS then how will transfer file structure data to IDOC structure? answer is Message Mapping
    From all the above decisions you need to provide following details in Interface determination screen
    1.Source System
    2.Outbound Interface
    3.Receiver System
    4.Inbound Interface(IDOC type)
    5.Message Mapping(i.e file to IDOC)
    Even in Interface determination you can specify the condition to select Inbound Interfaces(ex.IDOCs)
    if you have any doubts please lets know.
    Cheers,
    Jag

  • Extended receiver and enhanced interface determination

    Hi,
    Can somebody list me the business cases when we use the extended receiver and enhanced interface determination.In which scenarios we have to use them?
    Where we can use these features and whom they can replace?
    Regards,
    Anoop

    Hi Anoop
    have alook at thses URl's also
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/01322a7af25285e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
    :Dynamic file and variable substitution
    Similarly Extended Receiver determination is used to determine the receiver at runtime.
    Refer my reply:Re: Condition In Receiver Determination Not Working
    enhancement in ID
    Enhanced Receiver Determination:
    You use an enhanced receiver determination to have a mapping program determine the receivers of the message dynamically at runtime. Instead of creating the receivers in the receiver determination manually, you assign a mapping to the receiver determination and this returns a list of receivers at runtime.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm
    Enhanced (Mapping-Based) Interface Determination
    In an enhanced interface determination you do not enter the inbound interfaces manually, but instead first select a multi-mapping. You get the inbound interfaces from the target interfaces of the multi-mapping. The inbound interfaces are determined at runtime during the mapping step.
    You typically use an enhanced interface determination if the source message has an element with occurrence 0 ... unbounded (for multiple items of a data record) and you want multiple messages (for the individual items) to be generated at runtime.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
    <b>enhanced interface determination</b>
    /people/robin.schroeder/blog/2006/11/15/using-dynamic-receiver-determination-with-sync-interface
    /people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
    List of receivers can be dyamically determined and assigned at runtime using enhanced receiver determination .
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm
    Thanks
    Pls reward if useful

  • Enhanced  and conditional interface determination, :

    Experts ,
               can you giv me some link/ examples  of Conditional interface determination and Enhanced  Interface determination.
      Pls dont send me teh below link!
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
    many Thanks
    Arnab Mondal

    HI,
    U can refer this threads of same discussion:
    Re: Condition In Receiver Determination Not Working
    purpose of Enhanced Receiver Determination
    Then refer this blogs:
    Illustration of Enhanced Receiver Determination - SP16
    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration: Enhanced Receiver Determination for Synchronous Scenarios

  • Receiver and Interface Determination, Sender and Receiver Agreement

    Hi Experts,
    Could you please tell me, what Receiver Determination, Interface Determination, Sender Agreement and Receiver Agreement we have to use for the below blog.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    Regards
    Sara

    Hi Sara,
    WS->BP
    Receiver Determination: Sender IF, Sender NS, Sender BS determine the BP
    Interface Determination: Sender IF, Sender NS, Sender BS determine your start msg IF (abstr IF) and IF mapping
    Sender Agreement: SOAP sender channel for that Sender IF, Sender NS, Sender BS
    Receiver Agreement: not reqired
    BP->DB
    Receiver Determination: BP IF (abstr), BP IF NS, BP determine the 3rd party BS (DB)
    Interface Determination: BP IF (abstr), BP IF NS, BP determine Inbound-IF and IF mapping
    Sender Agreement: not reqired
    Receiver Agreement: JDBC receiver channel for that Inbound IF, NS and 3rd party BS
    BP->File
    Receiver Determination: BP IF (abstr), BP IF NS, BP determine the 3rd party BS (File)
    Interface Determination: BP IF (abstr), BP IF NS, BP determine Inbound-IF and IF mapping
    Sender Agreement: not required
    Receiver Agreement: File receiver channel for that Inbound IF, NS and 3rd party BS
    Regards,
    Udo

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to pen new window while redirecting to a page

    Hi, I have a jsppage 1,jsppage 2 and aspPage. In jsp2 I am getting the values from jsp1 using request.getParameter("hhhh").Once I get all values in jsp2 , as soon as I got the values I need to redirect to asp from jsp2. I don't have any form or any b

  • What software is used for Arch Linux News?

    I mean what software is used in here: http://www.archlinux.org/news/ Can you share it with us?

  • Uploading/converting videos to Ipod

    Everytime i upload a video to itunes, and then convert it to my Ipod there is never any Audio, Why is this?????? or how can i restore the Audio to it????

  • Invoicing Plan Partial Payment

    Dear All, I have created a Periodic Invoicing Plan for a year. I have started mid of the month for the first month and want the Invocing to be done in pro rata basis, For example in PO if we give 2000/- for a month, for 15 days (first month),we need

  • HT4436 iCloud control panel for my PC with Windows 7

    I just downloaded iCloud control panel for my PC with Windows 7, created an Apple ID, but when trying to open iCloud control panel it says the info I typed in is a legitimate Apple ID but not an iCloud login. ***?