Reconcile amounts paid to external vendor for Travel bookings

All,
We are implementing travel expenses in SAP. Employees can use an external provider for booking flight reservations. This external vendor invoices the company for  these expenses on a weekly basis. After the trip is undertaken, the employee enters the expenses. How do we reconcile the money that has been paid to the travel agency and the trips expeenses.
scenario
Step 1 - Employee calls up travel agency and books flight ticket to, say, California. The cost of ticket is 1000 Dollars.
Step 2 - Employee undertakes the trip.
Step 3 - Employee enter the trip expenses. They enter the flight costs that have already been paid by the company as expense type "flght paid" and the difference amounts are paid to the employee.
"Flight paid"    - 1000
Hotel              - 500
The employee is paid 500 dollars through FI.
Now the task of travel administrators is to check whether the amounts invoiced by the travel agencey match the amounts entered by the employees. They also want to ensure that employees mistakenly or intentionall do not enter the receipt type as "Flight" insead of "Flight Paid" when they are filling the travel expenses. What is the best way to handle this reconcilation issyes in travel management.
Appreciate any inputs on this issue.
regards
Sam

Hello Sam,
There are 2 options I could see here:
1) In the release you can customise in table V_T706S_RECEIPT on which the User cannot use the Expense Type "Flight" per.
2) You can use the User Exit EXIT_SAPMP56T_003. In this case it check the data before the user save the trip.
Regards,
Raynard

Similar Messages

  • Frieght amount paid to lorry vendor

    Hi Guru's
    My requirement is like this:
    PO - 20 tons
    GR 1 - 10 tons + freight cost (lorry freight) Rs 1000
    GR 2 - 10 tons + Freight cost (lorry freight) Rs 1500
    We need to pay freight cost to lorry driver not to vendor. the final bill from vendor comes after 10 - 15 days. Since the freight cost is not fixed value I can't plan in my PO. So how to enter this freight costs before doing invoce verification for actual goods bill.

    Hi,
    You have freight value as pricing element in your purchase order but you are paying to freight cost to lorry driver during goods receipt or just after goods receipt of purchase order.
    You have not mentioned that the freight value in purchase order is going to be invetorised or will be posted to separate G/L account as freight cost. Refer detailed settings freight condition type
    Delivery cost is not getting inventorize
    You can create freight vendor for lorry driver (XK01). Create Purchase order with assumed value  in freight condition type and assign the freight vendor to freight condition type in your Purchase order(ME21N). After goods receipt for your purchase order, you can post MIRO for lorry driver (freight vendor) for that purchase order by selecting “Planned delivery cost” in t.code:MIRO for the actual amount and based on tolerance limit set for tolerance key, the invoice document will be blocked which can released(MRBR)later for payment by finance department.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Refurbishment order for sending material to external vendor

    Hello everyone
    We have the requirement like the material is partially refurbished internally with the available resources and then we will send the same material to the external vendor for further processing(subcontracting).
    The cost of the both (internal + external) should be settled to the material.
    Thank for your inputs.
    Regards
    Santosh

    Hi Santosh,
    Below steps may help you, Anyway please check with your MM consultant as well
    MIGO     Send material to stores , Good Issue , Movement Type 202
    ME54N     Release PR : Order which you have raised.
    ME21N     Create P O
    ME29N     Release P O
    MIGO     Transfer posting to vendor, Transfer Posting to Vendor,Movement Type 941.
    And After return Movement type 942 and 201.
    Hope this will help you.
    Riyaj

  • F110/ FBZP - maximum amount paid per Vendor in Payment run

    Hi
    How do i create payment run where i want to restrict the maximum paid to a vendor per transaction.
    If amount exceeds this, i still wish to pay, but to split over more than one payment order
    Our BACS payments are now being processed via FASTER PAYMENTS, and there seems to be a limit of £100,000 per transaction per vendor - anything over is being rejected by danske bank
    So far example above, if vendor is due 156,000 - i wish to make this payment still to them, but over 2 or 2 payment orders, none of them to be more than 100,000
    I have tried several methods via FBZP by using the maximum amount, but none of my settings seem to work so far,
    Please advise
    Many thanks for your help
    Tony

    Hi Tony,
    Not exactly the solution, but going forward you can try split the invoices and process it separately at the time of invoicing itself. Otherwise you can try the option installment payment terms, but there may be at least one day difference in payment.
    Warm regards,
    Murukan Arunachalam

  • 1099's for external vendors

    We have a set of external vendors that are NOT set up in SAP.  Is there a way to create a 1099 form for these vendors using S_P00_07000134, but without setting them up as a vendor in SAP?  Is there a user exit (or something) that could capture this non-SAP vendor information before it is sent to the smartform?

    Hi Leslie,
         I also had the same requirement like few tax amount for a particular vendor is present in SAP and the remaining entries are present in the legacy system and we are asked to combine both the tax amounts from the SAP and the legacy syatem and disply in the 1099 form and i solved it. I am giving you the steps i took to solve it.
    1). Each SAP vendor (LIFNR) is linked with a legacy vendor(ALTKN) in table LFB1. Check for which SAP vendor your legacy vendor is linked.
    2). Create a custom table which has the key fields as SAP_LIFNR, LEG_LIFNR, WITHT and two other fields WT_WITHCD and the amount field.
    3). Now copy the Smartform which is used to the "Z" smartform. Inside which you can add the logic to display the legacy vendor details along with the Standard SAP vendor details.
    and also change the configuration of the smartform to the transaction using spro as shown in the screen shot.
    [http://picasaweb.google.com/103286534972377930456/SAP#5563430033050835330]

  • Reconciled amounts appears in vendor aging report

    Dear all,
    When we take report for reconciled transactions,reconciled amounts appears in
    aging days(Suppose we have ap invoice in 0-30 days and payments made in 30-60 days it's
    already reconciled)
    Why it is showing in reconciled aging report ?
    Jeyakanthan

    Dear,
    would like to recommend you to refer to the following note: 1228363-Business Partner Balance does not match journal entries。
    In any SAP Business One version lower than 2007, 2 separate
    reconciliation engines were employed. One reconciliation engine worked
    on the marketing document level, where partial reconciliation was
    supported & the other worked on the journal entry level, where only
    complete reconciliation was supported.
    This duality led in some instances to reconciliation inconsistencies
    which were initially highlighted with SAP Business One version 2004
    patch level 29, where the red message 'Business Partner balance does not
    match journal entries' was displayed when running the ageing report by
    sales documents & inconsistencies were detected.
    In the year end closing guides (available for download from the
    Documentation Resource Centre) SAP have always recommended to run the
    ageing reports by journal posting.
    In 2006, SAP published note 752261, now retired, documenting the system
    behaviour & offering a series of 'Select' queries to aid in
    reconciliation inconsistency analysis. These queries were an excellent
    tool but now SAP can offer a faster, better & more accurate solution.
    In SAP Business One 2007 A & B the reconciliation engines have been
    unified & partial reconciliation on journal entry level is now fully
    supported. Any database that is upgraded from a lower version undergoes
    a complex series of reconciliation upgrade algorithms, where any
    reconciliation inconsistency is identified & a reconciliation upgrade
    (RU) journal entry is automatically created. This RU journal does not
    document any accounting transaction, but simply creates an update in the
    'Balance Due' column, thus notionally re-openeing previously
    inconsistently reconciled transactions.
    These RU journals are then available for internal reconciliation.
    Please consult the 2007 Internal Reconciliation Upgrade(IRU)Landing
    Page:
    Channel Partner Portal -> Solutions -> SAP Business One -> Hot Topics ->
    SAP Business One 2007 Information Center -> New Single Reconciliation
    Engine- A single engine reconciles the difference and eliminates the
    previous reconciliation issue. More
    Click on 'More' to be directed to the IRU Landing Page.
    Here you will find 'How-to-Guides' in all supported languages, links to
    Expert Training Sessions & links to other pertinent information.
    You will also find available for download 2007 A & B upgrade simulation
    tools. SAP recommends to subject a database that is planned to be
    upgraded
    This upgrade simulation tool employs all internal reconciliation upgrade
    algorithms & the application will display in the 'Internal
    Reconciliation Upgrade Audit Trail Report' if a database is affected by
    inconcistencies.
    Hence, if the message 'Business Partner Balance does not match Journal
    Entries' is encountered, proceed as follows:
    Option 1:
    Upgrade database to SAP Business One 2007 & internally reconcile any RU
    journals.
    Option 2:
    Go to the IRU landing page & download the 'IRU pre-upgrade tool' either
    for version 2007A or 2007B, depending on your localisation. Follow the
    installation instructions & after successful installation & simulated
    upgarde of the database, analyse any inconsistencies appearing with the
    help of the How-to-guide. Should a type of inconsistency not have a drop
    down arrow & be described as 'Balancing upgrade journal transaction',
    the comapny accountant may decide to write it off, should the amount be
    insignificant or, if the amount is not insignificant, please log a
    support ticket with the component:
    SBO-ADM-UT-IAT
    Step by step detailed instructions including screenshots of how to
    install the sim-tool & what it does can be found on this wiki page:
    https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/B1/BPaccountBalancedoesnot+matc
    chJournalEntries
    Thanks & Regards
    Apple

  • GR/IR Account - one for internal vendor and another for external vendors

    Hi Experts,
    Can I have two GR/IR accounts - one for internal vendors and another for external vendors?  Please let me know.
    Thank you.
    with regards,
    Muthu Ganapathy.

    Hi Muthu,
    GR/IR accounts are not dependent on Vendors, they are dependent on Materials, to be precise on Plant/Valclass.
    You can post to 2 different GR/IR accounts if you set up 2 different classes. then it is possible.
    For setting up the same. Go to T.code : OBYC, Transaction : WRX.
    Here Setup different GR/IR accounts per val.class.
    Letme know if you need further info
    Thanks
    Kalyan

  • Production order usage for external vendors

    Hi Guys,
    I am working on a scenario where the company is orderiing to manufacture from external vendors involving different stages. There is no material sent to the vendor and the vendor manufactures the first stage and sends to next vendor, there are four stages involved.
    We are planning to use production order for the purpose and 4 operations thorugh which 4 purchase orders will be sent to four vendors and services or materials will be posted. I am just thinking how the final GR for finished product will be posted to the inventory. The requirement is track the cost at each stage...
    Please let me know of your thoughts on this...
    Thanks and regards,
    Sid

    Hi
    I dont think you will have any issues with the tracking of the cost and GR of the finished product.
    You have 4 operations each resulting into a PO for different Vendors each component/service of the opertaion will be received against each PO that you might have issued and so will be the cost collected actual cost for each operation.
    Final GR can be posted for the header material against the Production order. I would request you to complete a full scenario and review it with your FI/CO team for any issues. I dont think you will have any.
    Please let us know if you need any more info
    Thanks

  • Recommendations for best external speakers suitable for traveling.

    I am interested in purchasing a good set of external speakers suitable for traveling with my iPhone--compact with good stereo sound. Any recommendations?

    Depending on what you mean by compact, but I like the Bose Sounddock (portable)
    http://www.bose.com/controller?event=DTCLINKS_TARGETEVENT&DTCLinkID=7475&src=SOUNDDOCK

  • Suggestion on exposing ECC 6 Prod WebGUI for external vendors!

    Hi,
    Our requirement is provide access to few transactions of our Production ECC 6 (EhP4) to external vendors and currently there are no Portal business package for these transactions. Re-development of these transactions could take a long time because of the complexity involved.
    What I would like to know is what is the general practice and recommended approach in such scenarios:
    - Provide access to these transactions directly via ITS (WebGUI) using HTTPS protocol then by removing all toolbars and strict authorization roles assignment for the external users then secure it via Reverse Proxy using any Web Dispatcher?
    - Or create Web Applications (using BSP or WD4A) for each transaction and provide access through external portal?
    I would really like to know what's the best practice and recommended approach in such scenarios? And is exposing production ITS WebGUI as explained above safe?
    Thanks and Regards,

    Hello Shrinivas,
    If you are concerned about Security, then you can review the article "Security in SAP Internet Transaction Server (ITS) Landscapes" availble [here|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70362efc-d911-2a10-5794-9470fca27a10?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true].
    You can also review the article "How To... Configure SAP Web Dispatcher for SSL" available [here|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/60b1edfb-2a5c-2d10-2294-d1777056c46a&overridelayout=true].
    I hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Cristiano

  • How to get denomination of Notes ? for the amount paid

    Dear Freinds
       i have requirement where the total amount obtained by a employee through Cash . They wanted to have denomination
    for the amount paid ito that employee
    ex : An X employee got RS.5550 rupees as cash. They wanted to know how much money has been paid in Denomination
    of  10 Rupee notes,20 Rupee notes,50 Rupee notes,100 Rupee note,500 Rupee note & 1000 Rupee notes.
    so the data has to be displayed should be
    since the employee is gettign 5550 --> it has to 1000*5 --> Five Thousand rupees notes --- 5 count should come
    500 will be paid as ---> 500 * 1  -
    Five hudress count is 1
    50 is the balance -
    it will be paid as fivty note -- Count is 1.
    so i have to get  5000------ count 5 , 500 count 1,50 count 1. Can any one go this type of denomination doing code please
    let me know how to proceed.
    Regards
    divya
    Edited by: Divya Kumari on Jul 8, 2011 2:18 PM

    Actually
    the scenario is that in some employees ( if you go employee subgroup) like daily labour and casual labours will be paid
    on daily bais for them they will not be paid to bank . I n that case  those type of employees will be paid by CASH. So in teh month end the company wanted to knwo what type and how much money paid .
    regards
    divya

  • 2 days ago i rented The Avengers, beside it took almost 7h to download, at the end it did not get fully downloaded... 20 last minutes were not there. I know is just 5 dollars, but, how can i make a claim for the amount paid?

    2 days ago i rented The Avengers, beside it took almost 7h to download, at the end it did not get fully downloaded... 20 last minutes were not there. I know is just 5 dollars, but, how can i make a claim for the amount paid?, what if I buy a movie later? i will get the same problem!!! still I do not know how the avengers ends!! please do not tell me haha, focus on the problem here!

    Welcome to the Apple Community.
    Apple's policy on sales of digital content is that all sales are final. If however you wish to appeal to Apple, select the content which is causing a problem and use the 'Report a problem' button in Your Purchase History on your computer.
    Currently, if your purchase happens to be your most recent purchase you will not be redirected to the report form, in this case use the report a problem option from the invoice that was emailed to you.
    I believe your issues are probably a network issue, which unless you resolve are likely to be repeated again.

  • Bug - amount paid not showing for quotes summary

    Hi, Just noticed a bug.
    On the orders screen it doesn't show correctly "amounts paid" for quotes.
    Yet there has been a payment made for a quote.
    Screen Shot below.
    This is an issue for us as we use this screen as a check to make sure people which have paid have had their orders invoiced and sent - and as we can't see the payments on this screen we falsely believe that all orders are waiting payments when they aren't.
    Could BC please fix the code on the screen so it is correct. Thank you

    Thanks Liam, yes it is still a quote - the bug is the column showing amount paid isn't working.
    I thought it should be working as the column is there so must be a bug.

  • Employee as a Vendor in Travel Management

    Hi Experts,
    Please guide me about Employee as Vendor in Travel Management?
    Do we need to make employee as vendor for Reimbursement Payments.

    Thanks Cheyu..
    I am putting up my Understanding please correct me if i am wrong.This process is followed for Payment of Reimbusrsement amount to FI.
    Employee has taken advance & his actual expenses are beyond advance amount taken.
    First employee as a Vendor to be created BY HR Administrator.
    HR Administrator will create a Posting Run PRFI to create posting run( Do i need to create wagetypes for this)
    Transaction PRRW to create posting in FI- Activiity is done by HR Admin
    FI documents are created, there is a debt on supplier account so it must be paid. Payment is done by transaction F110 by FI guys.- This carried out by FI Admin.
    I believe this is the Process for Payment by FI to Employees
    Please guide.

  • Reconciled amounts appears in customer  aging report

    Dear all,
    When we take aging report for reconciled transactions,reconciled amounts appears in
    aging days ,the invoices which are reconciled still showing in Aging report  (Suppose we have ar  invoice in 0-30 days and its payments (journal entry ) made in 30-60 days it's
    already reconciled)
    Why it is showing in reconciled aging report ?
    I am using B1 2007 Pl 17
    Regards
    Saurav Gupta

    Hi Saurav Gupta,
    the ageing report allows you to pinpoint open transactions at a particular date.
    Consider this:
    System Date (Today) : 08.08.2011
    Ageing date 01.08.2011
    Invoice Posting date: 20.07.2011, due date : 31.07.2011
    Payment Date for invoice 02.08.2011
    You allow documents to be considered up to the ageing date.
    -> The invoice above, although fully paid, will be shown as overdue since you are ignoring all transactions after the ageing date. As far as the report is concerned, the payment hasn't happened yet.
    With these options, the invoice will be shown as well:
    System Date (Today) : 08.08.2011
    Ageing date 01.08.2011
    Invoice Posting date: 20.07.2011, due date : 31.07.2011
    Payment Date for invoice 02.08.2011
    You allow documents to be considered up to the system date & choose to display reconciled transactions.
    -> all documents up to today will be taken into consideration, meaning that both the invoice & the payment are shown in the report.
    To see the true open documents today, choose these parameters:
    System Date (Today) : 08.08.2011
    Ageing date 08.08.2011
    You allow documents to be considered up to the system date & have all tickboxes unchecked.
    Also, please upgrade your system at the earliest convenience, you are using a very old version.
    All the best,
    Kerstin

Maybe you are looking for

  • Help needed - events deleted from calendar?

    Saturday morning some events for the coming week disappeard from ICal on both my Mac and IPhone.  Tuesday am they were back.  Now things are gone for Thursday on both systems.  Tuesday events were single events, the Thursday items were repeating even

  • Sound not working for text alert just vibrate

    Sound not working for text alert just vibrate and no sound on keyboard

  • N97 Major Touchscreen Issue

    Hi HELP!! Since Friday the screen of my N97 has been all over the place.  I touch one part and it's unresponsive, I touch another and it does something that I didn't ask it to do. I figured out quite quickly that it was the screen calibration that ha

  • Hollow Stars for Albums

    So I don't rate my albums until I have rated my songs, but my problem is that I have several smart playlists based on album rating and when I rate a single song in iTunes that CD will then show up on my playlist due to the hollow star rating. Any way

  • Required Config and testing Docs for cash management/cash forecasting

    Hi All, My client need to implement cash management/cash forecasting .. Can anyone send the details Required Config and testing Docs for the same as earlier i have not worked in this area.. Thanks in advance... Regards, Sandip