Reg. PR generate for components

Dear Experts
I have created two material one is Finished material(T-Shirt) and another one is Accessories(Washcarelable) in CS01 I attached the accessories as component and saved.
Next I ran MRP in MD02 and MD04. The Purchase requisition is created for T-Shirt not for Accessories.
Pls advise what to do to create PR for component material. Not for main material(Finished product - Tshirt)
Thanks
Rajakumar.K

Hi,
Pls. check following settings for Component ( accessories ) as well as Header ( Tshirt) :
Component : in Material Master , Pls check MRP-1 View-> MRP type should be any active MRP type like PD or VB etc.It should not be ND ( No Planning) and MRP-2 View--> Proc type should be F ( External Procurement) to get PR.
Header : In material master , MRP dependent requirements should be
Materials for dependent requirements are planned
Save above settings and then run MRP .
Hope this will resolve your problem.
Revert if still problem persists.
Award points if useful and close the thread as solved problem.
Regards,
Tejas

Similar Messages

Plor not generated for components during Heuristic planning run

Hi experts,
i had run planning run PP_02 run in PPDS and i am able to see dependent requirment for componenets but my question is its not generating planned order for my components. Please let me know if i had missed any config.
Second point is i am planning to run 1. Infinit planning runa nd then finit planning run ( PP-02 and MRP_02).please suggest.
Third is when i run planning run (Product heuristic its giving me an error saying it space constrains.Please suugest me.
Thanks
Raj

Hi,
With the heuristics SAP_MRP_002: Product planning (plan comp. immediately) , components that are defined as being planned automatically and immediately are planned using a simple lot-sizing heuristic.
SAP_PP_001 is for Changing orders manually. Better choice may be to use SAP_PP_002: Planning standard lots. We use this heuristic to create new receipt elements in order to cover product requirements
regards
Datta

Reg serial numbers for components

Dear all,
I have a scenario in which BOM header material and its components are having serial numbers,
How to account the serial number of component to that of header , when we should do COIB (is it after goods receipt) for the header material whether we should have serial number at order release or at goods receipt.please give me detailed steps to do it.
Thanks in advance.

Dear,
Please refer this link,
[Serial Number For Component |http://www.sap-img.com/production/serial-number-for-component.htm]
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Multiple PR's generating for same material after MRP

Hi Guru's,
As per my business scenario, i am creating project with WBSE, Activities and BOM.
By using the reference points, i am transferring the BOM to Project, then executing MRP run.
But after MRP run i found that multiple PR's generated for the same Material.
Please find my BOM structure
BOM-->Assembly + raw material
Assembly is consists of
Sub-Assembly+ 2 raw materials
Sub-Assembly consists of
1 Raw Material.
as per this i should have 4 PR's after MRP but system is generating 8 PR's.
Please tell me where i am doing wrong
Regards,
Bhadra

Hi,
I find the reason why it is creating the multiple PR's for the same component.
It is because of the BOM status. Please find the attached scree shots for the BOM structure and BOM status.
As per my requirement the Planned Orders should be created for "BOM" and "Assembly" and 3 PR's should be generated for Components.
Initially i maintained BOM status as "4" for "BOM" due to that system is exploded the BOM twice i.e., for "BOM" and "Assembly" and generated PR's twice and two planned orders for "BOM" and "Assembly" along with their components.
Now to avoid the duplicates PR generation, i have maintained BOM Status as "5" for "BOM"and run MRP.
This time system is generated 3 PR's and 2 Planned Orders.
As per as PR's is concerned there is no issue. Coming to the Planned Orders there is a issue that, the components are not copied into order which is generated against "BOM" (BOM Status-5) and components are copied into order which is created against "Assembly"(BOM tatus-4)
But as per my requirement, the components should copied in both the orders.
So please tell where is the wrong in this..
Regards,
Rao

Grey (blank) EWA reports generated for Portal systems

I am attempting to set up EWA reports for J2EE systems. At this stage despite all efforts I continue to get grey rated (blank) reports generated for our Portal systems.
As far as I can tell all required components are installed correctly (Wily, SMD server, SMD agents etc).
This problem seems to be restricted to our Portal systems as report data is being generated for our XI J2EE engines with the same SMD components installed.
CGA collection jobs are running successfully against the managed Portal systems, and I have attempted to manually generate reports via transaction DSA in the Solution Manager system, using an uploaded service data xml file generated with the SMD/services utility. This also results in a blank report.
Our systems comprise the following components:
Wily v7.1
SMD 13 on Solution Manager and managed systems
Solution Manager 4.0 SP13: (ABAP):
SAP_ABA     700     0013     SAPKA70013
SAP_BASIS     700     0013     SAPKB70013
ST-PI 2005_1_700     0006     SAPKITLQI6
PI_BASIS 2005_1_700     0013     SAPKIPYJ7D
SAP_BW     700     0015     SAPKW70015
SAP_AP     700     0009     SAPKNA7009
BBPCRM     500     0009     SAPKU50009
CPRXRPM     400     0010     SAPK-40010INCPRXRPM
ST     400     0013     SAPKITL423
BI_CONT     703     0008     SAPKIBIIP8
ST-A/PI     01K_CRM560     0000          -
ST-ICO     150_700     0011     SAPK-1507BINSTPL
ST-SER     700_2006_2     0004     SAPKITLOK4
Solution Manager (J2EE):
sap.com     SAP_JTECHF     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070812015644)
sap.com     ISAGENT     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.14.0.20070927052333)
sap.com     SAP-JEE     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070812015311)
sap.com     SAP-JEECOR     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070907082334)
sap.com     BASETABLES     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070812013638)
sap.com     CORE-TOOLS     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070812014121)
sap.com     JLOGVIEW     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070812001600)
sap.com     JSPM     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070812001700)
sap.com     CAF     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070809092315)
sap.com     UMEADMIN     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070809093947)
sap.com     ADSSAP     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070812011854)
sap.com     BI_MMR     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070812013749)
sap.com     CAF-UM     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070809092324)
sap.com     KM-KW_JIKS     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070812014519)
sap.com     SAP_JTECHS     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070812015951)
sap.com     BI_UDI     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070811190400)
sap.com     LM-SERVICE     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070812001200)
sap.com     LM-TOOLS     7.00 SP13 (1000.7.00.13.0.20070906104634)
Among many, many others, the following notes and documentation has been followed:
976054 Availability of EWA for Non ABAP components
1010428 End-to-End Diagnostics
762969 - Grey rating for Earywatch Report
EWA guide for NON-ABAB components
SAP Solution Manager 4.0 End-to-End Root Cause Analysis Installation Guide
762969 - Grey rating for Earywatch Report
And of course all the Wily & SMD installation guides.
Please let me know if there is any other information required. I'm posting this in the hopes that someone else has had this problem and has been able to resolve it. I have read though what seems like hundreds of threads on SMD setup problems, however not many that describe the problem I'm having exactly.
Many thanks in advace.
Tim

Hi Stephan,
You're on the right track! When I try manually generate reports for our XI systems via uploaded service data, I only get valid report data if I generate report with graphics - otherwise the report is blank.
Alas with the Portal systems, I get no report data either way.
The XML storage table does contain data (with XI & Portal systems) - so comms with the J2EE is working.
Thanks for your help.
Tim

Make-To-Order MRP for components with unstricted-use stock

Dear Experts,
There is a finished goods of material with standard planning strategy group "20" in the material master.
There is a component e.g. material A, under the BOM of the FG material.
There is already enough unrestricted stock for material A which has no special stock indicator assigned.
After creating the sales order, I use MD50 to run the make-to-order MRP, but the result shows that there a purchase requisition has been generated for the material A with the sales order assigned and specail stock indicator = "E".
Is there any solution so that there will be no PR generated for mat A as there is enough unrestricted-use stock.
And in the production order of the FG, can the component only requires the unstricted-use stock instead of the "E" stock?
(It is ok for the FG goods receipt as "E" stock.)
Thanks a lot.

Hi Ram,
Thanks for your information.
I set the indi/coll = 2 and null for the strategy for the component material A
Just want to know, which strategy should I use for the finished goods? And any other setting for the finished goods and the component?
And which transaction MD02 or MD50 for the planning run for the finished goods?
In such setting, after the planning run , PR will be generated for the net external procurement?
Actaully my situation is that I just keep own stock for components, I want MRP to consider the own stock instead of sales order stock before generating PR.
Thanks for your help again.
Claude

Purchase requisition not generate for dependent requirement after MRP run

Hello PP expert,
In our MTO scenario after MRP run planned order generate for header material but no PR generate for BOM components, (BOM not explode) when we run MRP component level in MD02 PR generate, system showing message "40- No coverage not provided by master plan" in MD04 order tree. this problem coming after when we DIMP applied. I checked some OSS note also.
Can any one provide right solution.
thanks in advance.....its urgent as client requirement.
regards,
Amit Awasthi.

Hi Amit
You must select the green star for the correct answer, in order to close the thread.
You may also select the yellow start for the helpful answers, in order to award points for those who helped you. See the blog below for more details:
How to close a discussion and why
I can see that most of your old threads are still open, therefore, I'd like to ask you to review and close them, by selecting the correct answer.
BR
Caetano

Classes generated for Human Task UI

Hi All,
I created ADF UI out of a human task (using Automatically generate form option). After generating, I can see lot of .xml files under the HumanTaskForm package, in the newly generated project. I would like to know the way in which these classes (Java Bean) are generated under the HumanTaskForm package.
Also, when I update some values in the UI page at runtime, I am able to see the change , in the response message of the HumanTask. I would like to know, from where the binding information come from, for those UI components, so that they are able to update!
Kindly give me some good documents that would explain me regarding the bean classes generated for HumanTask.
When I searched for the same, I could get the documents regarding the configuration of Human Task only. I need information regarding the Bean classes for Human Task.
Thanks,
Sabarisri. N

Please post on the Jdeveloper and ADF Forum where you will get more help
JDeveloper and ADF

On screen display message generator for ThinkPad has stopped working

Hello,
This is a fresh install of Vista-32 on a lenovo x300.
Upon boot (or launching TPOSDSVC.exe) I receive the error message in the subject line.
There is an entry in the Application log, here is the jist of it:
Faulting application TPOSDSVC.exe, version 1.1.3.0 faulting module MMDevApi.dll_unloaded
I've uninstalled the On Screen Display application a few times - no luck
-I uninstalled it from add/remove programs then reinstalled it via the Lenovo System Update utility.
I've checked my video drivers - up to date according to lenovo
The problem is presitent under new profiles.
I did some digging online and found a possible fix of altering some reg keys
http://forums.lenovo.com/lnv/board/message?board.id=T_Series_Thinkpads&message.id=28789&query.id=223...
The keys mentioned in that post were non- existent in this computers registry.... ?
I added them .... no dice
thanks in advance
-kirby
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Dear All
Error message on start "on screen display message generator for thinkpad has stopped working"
Event Log "Faulting application TPOSDSVC.exe"
OS Vista Business 32
I have experienced this on a customer's ThinkPad R61e Machine Type 7650-DNG and found that the following solves the problem.
Firstly run Thinkvantage System Update and get everything up to date from Critical, Recommended and Optional Updates tabs.
Next Run Windows Update and view the available updates select all High Priority Microsoft updates and any optional ones that you require and (and this is where it differs from normal Lenovo advice) select the Conexant Audio driver aswell.
Current Vista version available on Windows Update is 4.98 (Date 23 Jun 2009)
Current Vista version available on Thinkvantage System Update is 4.18 (Date 2 Oct 2007)
NB Re-installing 4.18 may have solved the problem also, but I have not tried that and do not plan to.
I hope this helps.
Jason Bolton - BWCL - Lenovo Premium Business Partner - www.bwcl.co.uk

How to find the number of idocs generated for a customer on the basis of his purchase order in a day ?

How to find the number of idocs generated for a customer on the basis of his purchase order in a day ?

Dear Friends,
I am absolutely agree with your answer .
But my question is,
Lets say.....
One customer sending X number of purchase orders in a day , so how many IDocs generated on that specific day for that specific customer .
So, Question is , How can we find the no of sales orders(IDocs) generated for the customers on the specific day ?
Hope you all understood my requirement .
Thanks & Regards,
Aditya

Wrong Absence Quota generated for change of entitlement

Hi experts,
I have one employee joined somewhere in mid January 2008 (his IT000 start date, IT0001 start date, and IT0041 date is the same, i.e. mid Jan 2008).
The Annual Leave Base Entitlement setting (V_T559E) for his particular grouping is based on seniority:
Seniority 0 - 4 = 15 days
Seniority 4 - 9 = 18 days
Base period is : Calendar Years.
At the Selection Rule (V_T559L) :
- Accrual Period tab => Monthly (Take account of Change of WPBP is checked)
- Base Entitlement => Key date for determining seniority = Date Type (from IT0041)
- Accrual Entitl. => Pro rate calculation = selected
Up to last year (2011), the AL entitlement generated for the emp is 15 days (12 * 1.25). Which is correct.
When I create for next year (2013), 18 days is generated (12 * 1.5). Which is also correct.
For this year, 2012, I expect to see 18 days (or 17.75?). However I'm seeing 19 days.
After debugging, I found that for month of January, 2 entitlements are calculated.
Take for example the employee joined on 21 January 2008.
There were 2 records generated by HR_QTACC_QUOTAS_GENERATE:
1. 20.01.2012 with 1.25 day
2. 31.01.2012 with 1.25 day
For Feb until Dec 2012, I'm seeing 1.5 day for each month (which is correct). I.e. :
Feb: 28.02.2012 with 1.5 day
Mar: 31.03.2012 with 1.5 day
... and so on until dec
Dec: 31.12.2012 with 1.5 day
They all add up to 19 days.
Any advice on what should be corrected here?
Thanks in advance!

Hi, Yuki!
In your example, can you tell us how should it accumulate if the seniority date is in june/2012?
And another doubt, what is your accrual period?
What Iu2019ve understood every seniority change youu2019ll have this problem, if the employee starts in the company during the middle of the month.
Please answer that two questions, so I try to do some test here.
Regards,

Invoice getting generated for 103 MT not for 105 during ERS

Hi Experts,
I am facing one problem ,our client follows 103- 105 Mvt procedure for GR.
the requirement is to create automatic invoice through MRRL for movement type 105 but instead zero value invoice is getting generated for 103 MVT
Please suggest.
Regards.

Hi,
Does 105 is performed for your PO .
Before running MRRL.
Does GR based IV and ERS indicators are ticked in PO?
Do also check the below KBA it may help you.
1543167 - Invoice is posted with zero amount in T-code MRRL

ANN: XML Class Generator for Java Available

The Oracle XMCL Class Generator for Java is now available as an
initial beta release on the Oracle Technology Network at
http://technet.oracle.com. Select 'xml' from the Technology menu.
The XML Class Generator will generate a set of Java source files
based on an input DTD. The generated Java source files can then
be used to construct, optionally validate, and print a XML
document that is compliant to the DTD specified. This is an early
beta release and has the following features:
* Creates Java Classes from DTDs to enable the programmatic
construction of XML documents.
* Supports validation mode to assist debugging.
* Works with the Oracle XML Parser in Java.
* Creates documents conforming to the W3C XML 1.0
Recommendation.
* Supports creating documents in the following encodings:
UTF-8
UTF-16
ISO-10646-UCS-2
ISO-10646-UCS-4
US-ASCII
EBCDIC-CP-US
ISO-8859-1
Shift_SJIS
Oracle XML Team
http://technet.oracle.com
Oracle Technology Network
null

Thanks,
Rob
Oracle XML Team wrote:
: First, the link has been fixed. As to your access exception,
we
: have traced it to a difference between JDK 1.1.x and JDK 1.2.
: You can solve it by using a 1.1.x version of the JDK or wait
till
: our production version of our XML Parser becomes available
within
: a week which will work with 1.2.
: Oracle XML Team
: http://technet.oracle.com
: Rob Edagr (guest) wrote:
: : 1) The HREF on the download page for the NT version points
to
: : the version 102 parser not the classgen.
: : 2) After downloading and installing the classgen (by
guessing
: : what the url was) I ran it and get the following
: : C:\jdk1.2\xml\ora\classgen\sample>java SampleMain -root
: : wddxPacket wddx_0090.dtd
: : Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalAccessError: try
to
: : access class oracle/xml/parser/XMLNode from class
: : oracle/xml/classgen/ClassGenerator
: : at oracle.xml.classgen.ClassGenerator.generate
(Compiled
: : Code)
: : at SampleMain.main(SampleMain.java:65)
: : Any idea on what the problem is (same error with sample dtd)
: : Rob
: : Oracle XML Team wrote:
: : : The Oracle XMCL Class Generator for Java is now available
as
: : an
: : : initial beta release on the Oracle Technology Network at
: : : http://technet.oracle.com. Select 'xml' from the
Technology
: : menu.
: : : The XML Class Generator will generate a set of Java source
: : files
: : : based on an input DTD. The generated Java source files can
: : then
: : : be used to construct, optionally validate, and print a XML
: : : document that is compliant to the DTD specified. This is
an
: : early
: : : beta release and has the following features:
: : : * Creates Java Classes from DTDs to enable the
programmatic
: : : construction of XML documents.
: : : * Supports validation mode to assist debugging.
: : : * Works with the Oracle XML Parser in Java.
: : : * Creates documents conforming to the W3C XML 1.0
: : : Recommendation.
: : : * Supports creating documents in the following
encodings:
: : : UTF-8
: : : UTF-16
: : : ISO-10646-UCS-2
: : : ISO-10646-UCS-4
: : : US-ASCII
: : : EBCDIC-CP-US
: : : ISO-8859-1
: : : Shift_SJIS
: : : Oracle XML Team
: : : http://technet.oracle.com
: : : Oracle Technology Network
: Oracle Technology Network
null

Inputs on capabilities of Noetix Generator for OBIEE requested

Hi,
We are looking into a scenario where we are required to migrate large number of Discoverer 4i reports to OBIEE. We have good number of custom reports and views too that are to be migrated.
I am aware that [Noetix Generator for OBIEE|http://noetix.com/Products/NoetixGenerator/OracleBISuiteEEPlus.aspx|Noetix Generator for OBIEE] can handle it to some extent, but at the repository level - how seamless is the integration and how much customization/ETL would be required for the custom reports to be built on custom views (say 50 reports from 60 custom views).
Appreciate inputs from the experts based on their previous experiences.
Regards
KSK
Edited by: user633620 on Sep 30, 2008 9:53 PM

Hi,
We are looking into a scenario where we are required to migrate large number of Discoverer 4i reports to OBIEE. We have good number of custom reports and views too that are to be migrated.
I am aware that [Noetix Generator for OBIEE|http://noetix.com/Products/NoetixGenerator/OracleBISuiteEEPlus.aspx|Noetix Generator for OBIEE] can handle it to some extent, but at the repository level - how seamless is the integration and how much customization/ETL would be required for the custom reports to be built on custom views (say 50 reports from 60 custom views).
Appreciate inputs from the experts based on their previous experiences.
Regards
KSK
Edited by: user633620 on Sep 30, 2008 9:53 PM

Rule based ATP is not working for Components

Hi All,
Our requirement is to do availability check through APO for Sales order created in ECC,so we are using gATP.
Requirement: We are creating salesorder for BOM header (Sales BOM) and avaialbility check should happen for components i.e. Product avalaibility & Rule based substitution.
Issue: Product availiabilty is working for components but rules based substituion is working, mean Rules are not getting determind for components.
Settings:
- Header doesnot exist in APO and compnents do exist in APO
- Availability check is not enabled for header item category and enabled for Item category for components
- Rules have been created for Components in APO
- Rule base ATP is activated in Check instructions
We have also tried MATP for this i.e. PPM created in APO but still didn't get the desired result.
If we create salesorder for the component material directly then Rule based ATP is happening, so for components Rule based ATP is not working.
How do we enable enable Rulesbased ATP for components, i mean is there any different way to do the same.
Thanks for help.
Regards,
Jagadeesh

Hi Jagdeesh,
If you are creating BOM in ECC and CIFing PPM of FG/Header material to APO, I think you need to CIF Header material, too, with material integration model.
Please include header material in you integration models for material, SO and ATP check as well.
For component availability check, you can use MATP; but for MATP, FG should be in APO. You need not to CIF any receipts of FG (stock, planned orders, POs etc), so that MATP will be triggered directly. Then maintaining Rules for RMs will enable to select available RMs according to the rule created.
Regards,
Bipin

Reg. PR generate for components

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for