Regarding two cluster in a same domain

Let me explain the scenario here.
I have a domain with two cluster, consisting of managed server shown below.
Domain_name: Domain1
cluster_1: man1,man2,man3
cluster_2: man4,man5
JMS server: Jms_man1,Jms_man2,Jms_man3,Jms_man4,Jms_man5
Deployment strategy:
All application , connection factory, bridges, connection pool etc are deployed on cluster_1 and cluster_2
The external system, connect to Domain1 through JMS bridges through distributed destination.
The connection url used by external component bridges willl be url: t3://man1:port1,man2:port2,man3:port3
Now my understanding is , that with the above configuration,
All the incoming messages should be received only in man1,man2,man3. In other words, stopping man4,man5 shouldnt affect the messaging bridges of external system in any way.
Whereas the outgoing messages can go via man1,man2,man3,man4,man5.
Wanted to know if my understanding is correct or not.
Regards
Deepak

Hi Deepak,
I will explain my understanding on this:
t3://man1:port1,man2:port2,man3:port3This url is used only for the lookup of the connection factory object. Since the bridge uses this URL it does lookup only on one of these 3 man servers. But the actual connection created from the connection factory could be to any one of the server instance on which the CF is targeted. Since CF is targted to all 5 man servers, the actual connection created could be to any of the man servers. If the bridge is having an existing connection either to man4 or man 5 then when you bring down that server the connection will be reset and the bridge will try to reconnect to a live server - one of ms1, ms2 or ms3.
A small example to explain the concept .
Assume you have 3 man server cluster - ms1 , ms2, ms3.
Create a CF and target it to only ms1 and ms2. Weblogic does jndi replication across the cluster , so the CF will be available on the jndi tree of all 3 managed servers. So you can lookup the CF using a url like this : t3://ms3:port. However the connection created using that CF will be either to ms1 or ms2.
Create a queue and target to ms1 - Again due to cluster wide jndi replication this queue will be also available in the jndi of ms2 and ms3.
Now if your client looks up both the CF and queue say using the url t3://ms3:port and then try to send the message , the message can take the following routes to end up in the queue:
client ---(Having Connection to Ms2) ---> Ms2 ----(internally forwards to ms1) ---> Queue in MS1
client ---(Having Connection to Ms1) ---> Ms1 ----(puts to local queue ms1) ---> Queue in MS1
The below path wont be possible as the CF was not targted to ms3.
client ---(Having Connection to Ms3) ---> Ms3 ----(internally forwards to ms1) ---> Queue in MS1

Similar Messages

Can two applications share the same domain ?

Hello experts,
I have done a web application using struts, now the client need is splitting my application into two and accessing them like
First App :http://servername:port/demo/one/index.jsp
Two App: http://servername:port/demo/two/index.jsp
Is it possible that both the applications sharing single domain name?
Thanks in advance.
SRI.

Hello,
This can be done. the domain names can be same the context path will distinguish the service like
http://servername:port/demo/one/index.jsp Context part starts from Demo which can remain same and then you can have different services like one,two,three etc
to be more easy we
http://servername:port/service/app-name/ etc..
Please do let me know for more information.
Thanks
Suresh

Exchange 2013 Site Resilience - Basic questions for setup in two seperate AD Sites, same domain

I am just getting ramped up with Exchange 2013 and have a friend that I am assisting with planning an exchange 2013 deployment for. I am not asking for step by step directions for setup, just asking for a basic overview so I can dig in to this and
assist.
Goal is to have an exchange server, one in NC and one in Switzerland in an active/passive mode for site resilience. Both servers will be multi role servers.
This is a small organization, less than 50 users and on a budget for equipment. HQ is in NC and the server will have all roles installed on a single server. Switzerland will have only one Exchange server for fail over. There is only
one domain total with two AD Sites.
My questions for clarity -
1. Can I create a Site resilient deployment with two Exchange Multi Role servers in these locations?
2. Currently, the organization does not have a Load Balancer. Will this be required?
3. They do not have a third location for a Witness Server, what issues could potentially happen if the witness sits in one of the two sites?
4. Any other basics for this design are much appreciated. I am reading a lot, however a little confused as I read through the requirements.
Thanks for your input and direction!
Wall

Hi
Please find below answers to your questions.
1. Can I create a Site resilient deployment with two Exchange Multi Role servers in these locations?
Yes
2. Currently, the organization does not have a Load Balancer. Will this be required?
No you don't need to have a load balancer. As you are setting up the infrastructure in Active / Passive mode you don't need a dedicated LB for this.
3. They do not have a third location for a Witness Server, what issues could potentially happen if the witness sits in one of the two sites?
The issue with the witness server in primary or DR site is if your witness server is not responding your DAG won't work properly (failover). If you don't have a 3rd site then you can setup a witness server in your primary site and Alternate witness server
to your DR site.
4. Any other basics for this design are much appreciated. I am reading a lot, however a little confused as I read through the requirements.
I would recommend to use Exchange sizing calculator and technet is the best resource for you :)
Kindly mark this as answer if it fulfill your requirements. :)
Regards, Riaz Javed Butt Consultant Microsoft Professional Services MCITP, MCITP (Exchange), MCSE: Messaging, MCITP Office 365

Migrate & coexist Exchange 2010 to 2010 in two different site under same domain

Hi all,
The initial plan was planning to coexist Exchange 2010 (old data center) & 2013 (new data center) .
Unfortunately there was a problem of upgrading the existing exchange 2010 sp2 to 2010 sp3 and Microsoft said they don't support this anymore.
So the only plan I can think of is build another exchange 2010 with SP3 (new data center) to coexist with existing exchange 2010 SP2 first then followed by exchange 2013.
I don't see any relevant info on the Internet for the coexistence of exchange 2010 SP2 and SP3. can you please share some detailed steps or info?
Thank you very much in advanced.

Hi all,
The initial plan was planning to coexist Exchange 2010 (old data center) & 2013 (new data center) .
Unfortunately there was a problem of upgrading the existing exchange 2010 sp2 to 2010 sp3 and Microsoft said they don't support this anymore.
So the only plan I can think of is build another exchange 2010 with SP3 (new data center) to coexist with existing exchange 2010 SP2 first then followed by exchange 2013.
I don't see any relevant info on the Internet for the coexistence of exchange 2010 SP2 and SP3. can you please share some detailed steps or info?
The last database upgrade exchange 2010 SP3 is unable to mount server with Exchange 2010 SP2 i.e., there is no database schema upgrade from SP1 or SP2 to SP3. Please check this link :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4hJfdqTe5s
You may download exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 3 from here :http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=36768
This Exchange Server 2010 SP3 software may be used to perform a new installation or to update an existing Exchange Server 2010 installation to Service Pack 2 (SP2) level.
Moreover, to migrate the mailbox database from exchange 2010 to 2013, you may consider on this exchange migration tool (http://www.exchangemigrationtool.com/) that can be a good approach for you.

Portal 7.x and 8.x app in the same domain

Here's the deal.
I am developing a brand new Portal 8.1 app. At the same time, I am upgrading a
Portal 7.x app. The requirement is that they both run on the same domain, and
preferably as two desktops. How do I do this? Can they share the same webapp within
an application, or do they need to be separate webapps? Any dB issues that I need
to worry about?
Thanks
Kunal

Yes, it saves a lot of grief, providing all servers are equally secure of
course...
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:43:29 -0800, "Carl" <[email protected]> wrote:
Very cool. How does it work under the covers? The two WLS domain talk with
each other? So, the following would work:
o We have a WLS 7 domain
o The domain uses RDBMSRealm
o We created a new WLS 8 domain
o We set-up the trust
o Now, we login in to app on 8 domain, and it checks the 7's realm?Not quite - 8 still needs its own realm. The subjects (users and groups)
have to exist in both realms - 8 will just be taking 7's word for it that
"fred" has been authenticated but will still need to check fred's group
and/or role mappings.
The same realm data needs to exist for both systems. In LDAP it would be
easy enough to point them both at the same directory but.for a database
there is less control over the mappings - any differences between RDBMSRealm
and 8's RDBMSAuthenticator (unless you want to run compatibility security)
schemas might cause problems. I believe running the latter on both should
work but in principle the schema could change in a later version of the
product.
>
"Alex Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
See "Enabling Trust Between WebLogic Server Domains" section in
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/secmanage/domain.html#1140940
This works between 7 and 8 (and, using the system account, on 6.1).
cheers
Alex
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:22:29 -0800, "Carl" <[email protected]> wrote:
You can make the 7 domain trust the 8 domain so users don't have to log
in
twice, but you can't run the two versions in the same domain (not agreat
deal of benefit in doing so, once trust is sorted).How we do make 7 domain trust the 8 domain?

Can two cluster run on single role

HI TEAM,
i want to know if the below case is possible or not.
CASE 1:
Can 2 clusters run over a same Role or not ? IF yes what will be the default network name of the 2nd cluster. will it be like [cluster name 2] I tried creating 2 client access point on same role and it works and shows that they
are under same cluster.
if its possible to create 2 cluster over same role, what can be the default network name of that, because i observed that for the　1st　access point or cluster the default network name was [cluster name]
sid

Hi sidhanttiwari,
Base on my experience, you can add two same role to a cluster, you also can customize this roles name as the first role. You can not create two cluster role with same name
but you can add multi IP address to the same client access point.
The related article:
Using Multiple Client Access Points (CAP) in a Windows Server 2008 (R2) Failover Cluster
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2010/08/24/using-multiple-client-access-points-cap-in-a-windows-server-2008-r2-failover-cluster.aspx
Configuring IP Addresses and Dependencies for Multi-Subnet Clusters - Part III
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/clustering/archive/2011/08/31/10204142.aspx
I’m glad to be of help to you!
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Regarding install of obiee11g on two machines Should be part of same domain

Hi Experts,
Actually we need a requirement like this i.e
I want to install obiee 11g on two machines
Should be part of same domain
But want to run only one service on one host
Like bi server on one host
And presentation on another host
Can any one please help on this
Thanks in Advance,
Siva Shankar

Hi,
you can get all the info the installation and configuration guide.
Here´s the link:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10415_01/doc/bi.1013/b31765.pdf
http://gerardnico.com/wiki/dat/obiee/installation_11.1 -- Step by step install obiee plese refer this link .
Weblogin install steps._
http://www.togotutor.com/weblogic/windows-weblogic-10-3-4-installation.php -- please refer the below link step by step with screen shot.
Cluster steup:_
You have to modify below config files OBIEE 11g clustering setup.
1. Nqsconfig
2.Nqsclusterconfig
3.odbc.ini
4.web.xml
5.instanceconfig.xml
Please refer the below links.
http://www.rittmanmead.com/2010/07/obiee-11gr1-scaleout-clustering-and-high-availability/
Please send me your mail id I will provide obiee installation link on my blog -- in this blog step by step is ther how to install obiee.
Hope this help's
Thanks
satya

How can two independent DirectAccess servers be set up safely in the same domain?

I've got a single-tier certificate authority running on a 2008 r2 domain controller with an expiring root certificate. I have a new 2012 r2 domain controller with a new single-tier certificate authority. I also have a DirectAccess server running on 2012
server (two NICs, NAT, IP-HTTPS only). I'd like to get a new DirectAccess server set up running server 2012 r2 using the new CA for the various DirectAccess server and client computer certs. I can get the new environment working and flip machines from
the existing implementation to the new implementation.
I was previously told by a tech working one of my Microsoft support tickets that two independent DirectAccess servers can't run in the same domain. However, I posted a related question
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/projectserver/en-US/ab53a314-91ea-4d40-afd5-6b8f62698547/2012-directaccess-and-expiring-certificate-authority?forum=winserverNIS and got a response indicating that two independent DirectAccess servers can run
in the same domain. If I can carefully get a second server operational within the same domain, I can build a reg file to deploy to all machines prior to the cutover that will simulate the gpupdate for broken machines in the field, getting them connected so
the policy can be properly pulled from a DC. Would anyone else be willing to confirm or elaborate on operating two independent DirectAccess servers in the same domain? What are the gotchas?

Hi,
Yes you can have 2 Da deployments in one domain.
I have done this a number of times for customer when upgrading from UAG DA to 2012.
Make sure you use different Group policies for the DA servers and Clients. make sure you target the client with only one GPO at a time. Also use different AD groups.
You then change the GPO assignment to the clients and they will flip when the client does a gp update. I have done this for a site that had over 5000 clients and we didn't have one call about it.
You can use DirectAccess Offline Domain Join for any broken machines.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/jj574150.aspx
Regards, Rmknight

Two sites, Two Exchange servers, same domain

Exchange can seriously baffle me at the best of times. Which is why I'm writing here at the moment.
I have 2 sites in two geographical locations for the same business connected via IPsec VPN. At each site we have:
- Domain Controller (domain.local)
- RDS Server
- File server
- Exchange server (domain.org.au) (SiteA - exch1, SiteB - exch2)
All servers are Windows Server 2008R2, Exchange servers are 2010, Outlook is also 2010.
Both exchange servers are set up with DAG replicating the primary mailbox database.
Both RDS servers have outlook set up - users are currently connecting to exch1 for exchange connectivity (at both siteA and siteB)
I want to configure the outlook clients so that SiteA uses exch1, and SiteB uses exch2.
When testing, I manually set up an outlook profile and entered the server name as 'exch2', but upon clicking 'check name' it substituted 'exch2' for 'exch1'.
I have had a look at implementing CAS array, but this will not work as we have DAG set up between exchange servers, and according to a microsoft article this cannot be done:
""WNLB can't be used on Exchange servers where mailbox DAGs are also being used because WNLB
is incompatible with Windows failover clustering.""
Is there something I need to change in either the Group Policy or Autodiscover instance, or even DNS to allow this to work? Is this even possible? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Forgive me - I still dont quite understand what's required..
Because I have 2 physical sites with AD and Exchange, even though both sites are using the same domain and the same Exchange Mailbox Database, I still require 2 CAS arrays?
Just to clarify, both DC's arent under separate sites within Active Directory Sites and Services - they are both members of the 'Default-First-Site-Name' site. Would this make any difference to the config I am aiming for?
I can understand the concept of having 2 CAS arrays, one for physical site A and physical site B, so that their respective RDS servers outlook clients point to their own local exchange server - but if both exchange servers are replicating and using the one
Mailbox Database, I'm not sure if that will cause any issues - Cant you only apply one CAS array per database?
Also, if I am unable to use network load balancing because the software balancing service wont work with the cluster service, what IP(s) would I point the CAS array to - my guess is the local IP's of the exchange servers for its relevant site?

Multiple ADFS farm or two IDP in same domain

Greetings,
I have requirement, please give me idea whether two ADFS farm is possible in the same domain. .
Eg: one ADFS1 farm pointing to Webserver1 and another ADFS farm pointing to Webserver2.
ADFS1 should act as point to contact for ADFS2.
When traffic come and hit ADFS1, for webserver2. ADFS1 should give to ADFS2 for other process.
Two IDP is possible in single Domain:
ADFS2.0 for Web1 and Ping federate for web2.
All traffic should pass through ADFS and then to ping federate to access web2 application.

Forgive me - I still dont quite understand what's required..
Because I have 2 physical sites with AD and Exchange, even though both sites are using the same domain and the same Exchange Mailbox Database, I still require 2 CAS arrays?
Just to clarify, both DC's arent under separate sites within Active Directory Sites and Services - they are both members of the 'Default-First-Site-Name' site. Would this make any difference to the config I am aiming for?
I can understand the concept of having 2 CAS arrays, one for physical site A and physical site B, so that their respective RDS servers outlook clients point to their own local exchange server - but if both exchange servers are replicating and using the one
Mailbox Database, I'm not sure if that will cause any issues - Cant you only apply one CAS array per database?
Also, if I am unable to use network load balancing because the software balancing service wont work with the cluster service, what IP(s) would I point the CAS array to - my guess is the local IP's of the exchange servers for its relevant site?

How can I use the same domain.sites2 on two macs?

I know iWeb is no longer supported but I still find it ok to manage my web site.
I would like to work on the site from two macs. I thought I could just use the same Domain.sites2 on both macs but: if I move Domain.sites2 to dropbox folder, when I launch iWeb it does not know about it and creates a new empty Domain.sites2 in the Library/iWeb folder
I do not want to have to manually make a copy of Domain.sites2 to Dropbox and then to the other mac's Library every time I switch computer.

You may want to use :
http://wyodor.byethost8.com/iwebsites/iWebSites.html
Select "Choose new folder" from the File menu to select the folder on Dropbox where your domain file is.
If that does not work, use:
http://wyodor.byethost8.com/iwebsites/iWebDrop.zip
(Unzip the file and drop the domain file on top of it)
After that, you can open iWeb with your currently used domain file.

If I have two Root CA in the same Domain, Do I have to configure two seperate locations for the CRLs

Hello All
Can someone please help me with the following question :)
I asked the question, can you have two Enterprise Root CA in the same AD domain. This question was kindly answered by Paul
here the answer was Yes.
As far as I believe the two important aspects from a client point of view (e.g. IE on Windows 7 PC for example) are
1: Public key of the CA (e.g. the CA cert published in AD and therefore downloaded to the X509 store on your PC)
2: CRL (published via LDAP (in Configuration partition of AD), HTTP/S or File Share)
I believe as long as you have access to the above two you can turn the CA off if you want.
I believe the location of the CRL is detailed in the CDP which is detailed on the Certs issued but a given CA, so the client can look in the Cert and see what it states about the CDP and thereby get the list of revoked certs.
If all of the above is correct?
when I add a second Root CA to the same Domain, do I need to use a CA setup file (e.g. the text file, I believe with a .inf extension) to tell the CA setup routine to place its CDP at a location other than the default location in case it overwrites
the existing CRL at the default location. Basically I do not want to overwrite (delete) the current CRL when installing another Root CA or does the fully qualified X500 name of the CDP include the CA Name (and therefore be unique) and it will not over write
the original?
Thanks All
AAnotherUser__
AAnotherUser__

> I believe as long as you have access to the above two you can turn the CA off if you want.
Enterprise CAs are not intended to be offline. Therefore, you should not turn off them. If these root CAs issue certificates only to subordinate CAs, then you should consider to implement offline Standalone (not Enterprise) Root CAs.
> I believe the location of the CRL is detailed in the CDP which is detailed on the Certs issued but a given CA, so the client can look in the Cert and see what it states about the CDP and thereby get the list of revoked certs.
this is correct.
> to place its CDP at a location other than the default location in case it overwrites the existing CRL at the default location
no, CDP locations should be defined in the post-installation script.
> does the fully qualified X500 name of the CDP include the CA Name (and therefore be unique) and it will not over write the original
yes, LDAP URL includes CA server's NetBIOS name to differentiate between CAs.
My weblog: en-us.sysadmins.lv
PowerShell PKI Module: pspki.codeplex.com
PowerShell Cmdlet Help Editor pscmdlethelpeditor.codeplex.com
Check out new: SSL Certificate Verifier
Check out new:
PowerShell FCIV tool.

Is it possible to have two SCCM instances for the same domain

Hello - I'm the IT Project Manager for an organization that has a single domain-production.
In here, we have an instance of SCCM 2012 setup. This instance is used to build packages, images, testing, validations, modifications etc. as well as for production roll outs. The primary issues we have with this is there is no separation between test and
prod, also, there are several packages, task sequences etc causing confusion in determining which is a test package and which is prod.
Setting up a test domain does not seem to be a viable option for us, at least for now.
So, my question is, can we have another instance of SCCM in the same domain that we can restrict only for the sake of testing & validations and then use the original one to deploy the tested (gold) packets.
Just a thought!! Does it make sense? Any challenges that we could face?
Thanks in advance
Jagan Pantina
JP

Hi,
Yes you can no problem, you should avoid having Boundary / Boundary Groups used for Site Assignment that overlap and make sure that PXE request to the test/dev environment is restricted to one test subnet to avoid co-existance issues.
Regards,
Jörgen
-- My System Center blog ccmexec.com -- Twitter
@ccmexec

How to make two NT cluster in a same network?

We are having 2NT m/c one clusteer and 2NT M/c in other cluster.Both clusters having same application installed and same configuration.The problem we are facing is some of the requested for a perticular cluster(say firest cluster) is going to other(Second).
How can we dissable communication between these clusters?
Thaks
Siva Prasad

Hi,
The iPlanet Application server has two Multicast addresses over which it broadcast registry information for Load-Balancing and Clustering. By default both of the Multicast addresses are same but the port is different. The application server keeps on updating it's host database by detecting all the application servers that has same Multicast address in the same subnet.
Open the iPlanet registry editor and go to Application Server/6.0/GMS/KAS and Application Server/6.0/GMS/KES, you will find an entry called MCastHost in both of these locations. These are the two virtual Multicast address used by the the application server. If your m/c IP address is like abc.def.ghi.xxx then the Multicast address will be like ghi.8.18.71.
In a cluster the Multicast address mentioned under .../KES should be same for each member Application server, and this is the place you need to change your Multicast address to disable the communication between the two cluster in same subnet. Just change the Multicast address in the registry of each Application server of second cluster (for example from ghi.8.18.71 to ghi.8.18.75 or something. It is better if you change both Multicast address for second cluster.
The approach suggested by Vasanth will work till you restart any of the server, if you restart both of the servers whose IP address entry you have deleted in each other's registry, it will update it again after startup.
Please feel free to ask further questions.
Sanjeev.

Two CAS Servers on the same domain but different AD Sites

I have a customer that has 1 EXCH MB server & 1 EXCH server running the Hub Transport and Client Access roles. These two servers are in the same domain and reside in AD site A. Now he wants AD Site B (also in the same domain) to have 1 EXCH MB server
& 1 EXCH server running the HUB/CAS role. The problem is the CAS role in site A is the only one that is public interfacing. The CAS server in site B has not certificates at all, and I want all the mail to re-route to the CAS server in Site A. Does anyone
know how I can do that???

The CAS in the internet facing site will proxy to the CAS in the non-internet facing site. And you do have a cert on that CAS in Site B. The default built-in one. However, if you have clients in Site B, you should replace that built-in cert with one that
is trusted by clients such as Outlook and Lync etc...It doesnt have to be a 3rd party cert, it could be on that is trusted internally.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb310763(v=exchg.141).aspx
Understanding Proxying and Redirection
Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

Regarding two cluster in a same domain

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for