Requirements date for VSF -- why not on first of month?

Please help me understand this peculiar system behavior. 
MD04 routinely displays the plant/materialu2019s planned independent requirement as a u201CVSFu201D having a requirements date of the first work-day of the period.
What I cannot explain is why the October 2012 VSF has a requirements date of September 21, 2012.  Why would the date not be October 1, 2012?  The factory calendar assigned to the plant has October 1, 2012 as a work-day.
Same situation for December 2012.  The VSF for December has a requirements date of November 21, 2012.
For the rest of 2012, and for the first three months of 2013, the VSF elements are dated on the first work-day of the month.  What would cause the requirements to fall a week and a half early for October and December 2012?
By the way, I am not very fluent in MRP, so please do not assume that I have ruled out something obvious. 
Regards,
zKen

Well, we figured it out.  The problem was the fiscal year variant. 
A few years ago, we were a nine-to-five, Monday-thru Friday kind of company.  As such, the accounting periods were carefully managed so that a period never ended over a weekend or on a holiday.  Nowadays, we are a 24-7 operation, and accounting periods correspond to calendar months.
But when we changed over the fiscal year variant, it was only set up thru 2011.  2012 still had the old period strategy. 
On the MRP3 tab of the material master record, material/plants are assigned the period indicator u201CPu201D, Period according to fiscal year variant.  We forecast by periods in S608. 
MRP was just doing its thing and determining requirements according to our accounting periods and setting the requirements date accordingly.
Solution:  correct the fiscal year variant out for a few more years.  Transport, reload the forecast data, transfer to demand management, and run MRP. 
All is well in the stock/requirements list.
Edited by: zKen on Nov 22, 2011 3:27 PM

Similar Messages

  • Requirements date for VSF "backdating" itself in two months

    Please help me understand this peculiar system behavior.
    MD04 routinely displays the plant/materialu2019s planned independent requirement as a u201CVSFu201D having a requirements date of the first work-day of the period.  What I cannot explain is why the October 2012 VSF has a requirements date of September 21, 2012. Why would the date not be October 1, 2012? The factory calendar assigned to the plant has October 1, 2012 as a work-day.
    Same situation for December 2012. The VSF for December has a requirements date of November 21, 2012.
    For the rest of 2012, and for the first three months of 2013, the VSF elements are dated on the first work-day of the month. What would cause the requirements to fall a week and a half early for October and December 2012?
    I should add that this peculiarity is not limited to one material. It happens over many materials and across all plants. The common thread among the materials is that we plan them into info structure S608 and then disaggregate among the active warehouses / shipping points.
    By the way, I am not very fluent in MRP, so please do not assume that I have ruled out something obvious.
    Regards,
    zKen

    Well, we figured it out.  The problem was the fiscal year variant. 
    A few years ago, we were a nine-to-five, Monday-thru Friday kind of company.  As such, the accounting periods were carefully managed so that a period never ended over a weekend or on a holiday.  Nowadays, we are a 24-7 operation, and accounting periods correspond to calendar months.
    But when we changed over the fiscal year variant, it was only set up thru 2011.  2012 still had the old period strategy. 
    On the MRP3 tab of the material master record, material/plants are assigned the period indicator u201CPu201D, Period according to fiscal year variant.  We forecast by periods in S608. 
    MRP was just doing its thing and determining requirements according to our accounting periods and setting the requirements date accordingly.
    Solution:  correct the fiscal year variant out for a few more years.  Transport, reload the forecast data, transfer to demand management, and run MRP. 
    All is well in the stock/requirements list.

  • CONTROL DATA FOR ACTIVITY TYPE NOT MAINTAINED

    dear all
    i get this error when calculating production order cost
    control data for activity type 1000\4230\1420 not maintained for fiscal year 2007
    i hv maintained data in kp26
    can any one pl help. i am learnign sap pp and hv 4.7 version
    thanks and regards

    Dear Anshuman
    my prob. started during cost cal. in prod. order first error was version 0 not maintained for fiscal year 2007, THEN i maintained it in the path as told by you T code OKEQ.
    but after that error changed to CONTROL DATA FOR ACTIVITY TYPE NOT MAINTAINED ( 1000/4230/1420)
    i maintained data in kp26, but the error is still coming
    pl. suggest some solution as i am not able to proceed further.
    Thanks and regards
    Raj

  • What is this message: Base Line Date for rule 11 not set ?

    Hello all,
    I am doing some test.
    Cenario:
    I need to create a Scheduling Agreement in transaction: VA41
    The material I am using to create the VA41, I have just created.
    I created in MM01 the views: Basic Datas 1 and 2, Sales View 1,2 and 3 and Account View 1.
    Issue:
    When I am creating the VA41 and I enter the material, the system shows the messages:
    1) Dates from:: Base line date for rule 11 not set
    2) Dates from:: Base line date for rule 9 not set
    *obs: the messages dos not block the creation of VA41. It is a information message.
    Question:
    What that means? What will happen if I do not fix that? What should I do in order to not have more these messages?
    Tks & Rgds,
    Barbara
    Message was edited by:
            Barbara Barbos

    Hi
    Please check whether you have assigned - payment terms both at company code and sales area level
    VVR

  • Idoc INVOIC error Baseline date for payment does not exist

    Dear All,
    I am facing the following error message when processing an idoc to do an MM invoice reception (operation similar to a MIRO).
    The payment term is correctly maintained in the purchase order.
    Idoc message type INVOIC MM.
    Baseline date for payment does not exist
    Message no. M8356
    Diagnosis
    You have tried to post a document without a baseline date for payment.
    The system will not allow you to do this.
    Check the purchase order. No terms of payment have been entered in the document header or no suggestion has been defined in Customizing for the baseline date for payment for the terms of payment entered.
    If you get the error message during automatic settlement of planned delivery costs, maintain the term of payment in the master record (Payment Transactions, Financial Accounting) for the freight vendor or use the Business Add-In MRM_ERS_HDAT_MODIFY to determine the term of payment.
    Regards
    Arnaud

    Hello,
    Date for starting the calculation of the baseline date is indeed managed in the TC OME2 (document date, posting date, etc..).
    In my project, there is already some companies using payment term N60N, so it should be possible to continue using it.
    I solved this issue by putting a payment term in the vendors master data (company & purchasing views) and also in the customers views (company / sales orga) otherwise the structure of the idoc is different.
    Thanks anyway for your input.
    Keep in touch.
    Regards
    Arnaud

  • Function module to determine the date for the nth weekday of the mth month

    Hey folks,
    Is there a function module which determines the date for the mth weekday of the nth month in the pth year.
    For instance, if I input 2nd thursday of the 4th month in 2008, it should return me, 04/10/2008  (MM/DD/YYYY).
    Thanks and Best Regards,
    Puja.

    Hi Ravi,
    Hadn't been able to work on this lately...You solution was quite close, but did not work for a few scenarios....I tweaked the logic a bit to take care of them as well...
    So here goes the code:
    ================================================
      DATA first_day_of_month TYPE datum.
      DATA day TYPE p.
      CONCATENATE year month '01' INTO first_day_of_month.
      CALL FUNCTION 'DAY_IN_WEEK'
        EXPORTING
          datum = first_day_of_month
        IMPORTING
          wotnr = day.
      DATA day_number TYPE numc2.
      IF day = weekday.
        IF recur = 1.
          DATA ls_date(10) TYPE c.
          CONCATENATE month '/01/' year INTO ls_date.
          CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERT_DATE_TO_INTERNAL'
            EXPORTING
              date_external                  = ls_date
           IMPORTING
             date_internal                  = date.
        ELSE.
          day_number =  ( ( recur - 1 ) * 7 )  + 1.
        ENDIF.
      ELSEIF day < weekday.
        day_number = ( ( recur - 1 ) * 7 ) + ( weekday - day ) + 1.
      ELSE.
        day_number = ( ( recur - 1 ) * 7 ) + ( 7 - day ) + weekday + 1.
      ENDIF.
      IF date IS INITIAL.
        CONCATENATE year month day_number INTO date.
      ENDIF.
    ====================================
    There still could be some loopholes in this....am not sure....but it sure did seem to work for a couple of random checks that I performed.
    Brownie points to you for giving me a direction.
    Thanks,
    Puja.

  • Requirement date for 3 level  Component in BOM

    Iam having Multilevel  Sales order bom
    Header material requirement date and receipt date given by system is 23.04.2009
    first level assembly requirement date and receipt date given by system is  is 07.04.2009
    second level assembly is phantom
    Third level componant requirement date is 31.03.2009 and receipt date given by system is 19 June 2009 .
    Gr proceesing time of 2 days is maintained and no planned delivery time is maintained.
    Why Third level componant receipt date given by system is 19 June 2009 ?
    Edited by: mayuresh  bhurke on Jan 19, 2009 6:31 PM

    Mayuresh,
    It seems the 3rd level component has a long planned delivery time in material master. Hence the system  has pushed the receipt date forward to 19 June 2009  from 31.03.2009. Please check material master time for the 3rd level component.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Ram

  • No up-to-date for Academic - why?

    Can anyone explain why I have to buy a full version of 2.0 when I just bought the academic version of 1.5 in January? The up-to-date for $9.95 deal was denied by Apple, and now I am reading in numerous other posts that the $99 upgrade will not work on academic licenses either. I regret that I cannot go back in time (for many reasons, not just Aperture-related), but if I had known that I could have saved money by buying the full version of a soon-to-be obsolete piece of software, I would have paid the extra hundred then and been able to upgrade for 9.95 instead of $70 - $100!

    The academic version is not eligible for upgrade - this is not new. When Aperture first came out at about $300 - $149 for the academic version was a smokin' deal. I figured then when the next version came out I would still be ahead (since I figured to still be eligible for the educational version) - $149 + 149 = $298 as opposed to $299 + 99 = $398.
    For someone just starting with version 2 - the $20 savings for the academic version ONLY makes sense if you plan to never upgrade, unless you can get the academic version for considerably less at your local campus computer store - which is often the case.
    Scott

  • Service Desk: Pricing data for partner could not be read

    Hi all,
    I am trying to configure the Service Desk functionality for Service Providers (on EHP1).
    I follow the SAP Documentation (SAP Solution Manager: Service Desk for Service Providers) and SLA's made easy in SAP Solution Manager. Also some discussion threads helped me with some steps (I applied e.g. the recommendation from Pricing data for partner 106 could not be read. , but it didn't help).
    I am facing some errors related to the CRM part of the configuration.
    When I create Service Desk Contract (SLFV) in CRMD_ORDER, the error appears Pricing data for partner xxx could not be read. I checked the setting of BP and I am not able to find the reason, for customer's (sold-to-party) BP the sold-to-party > Sales Area Data the Sales Organization/Distribution Channel/Division are maintained. Which information for pricing is needed and where can it be configured?
    Another error - I am sure it is related to the first one - the service contract cannot be determined in the service message (in Item details view under product). The error messages are about sales area/organization, so I suppose there is something wrong with the link Service Contract -> Business Partner definition.
    Could you please help me what can cause the error?
    Thanks in advance,
    Vaclav

    Hi Balaji.S,
    my problem was solved when I double checked the settings of org structure. That means there must be a consistent setting for sales organization / distribution channel / division in businness partner (tcode BP), organizational model (PPOMA_CRM), product workbench (COMMPR01). The setting must be same for both the sales department of the service provider and the customer's company (I am sorry I am not CRM, so I am following just this simple logic)
    In the long text of the error (in CRMD_ORDER) I could see "expected" combination for sales organization / distribution channel / division (message e.g. The access was carried out with sales organization 'O 50000613', distribution channel '01' and division '') -> when the org model was set up everywhere in this way, the contract was automatically filled by the organization data and in the next step the contract could be determined in the service desk message.
    Anyway it took some time to find out the correct combination. Deeper CRM knowledge would help me much.
    Vaclav

  • AT&T has great support for WP, why not VZW?

    So first the Lumia 928 is released in only black and white, even though Nokia had made a cyan and red version. Why?
    The Lumia Icon was ready from Microsoft/Nokia to be released in November 2013, but Verizon didn't release it until after the holiday season in February 2014 after poor marketing. Now after only 8 months, its being retired. Why?
    The Lumia 930 is the equivalent of the Lumia Icon, except the 930 has been released overseas in multiple colors. Verizon only offered, again, black and white. Why?
    Lumia Cyan. AT&T was able to test and release Lumia Cyan for the Lumia 1020 by August (2 months ago), for the Lumia 920 and 820 it was released early last month. No Windows Phone on Verizon has yet received this update (nor does Verizon care to enlighten us as to when we can expect it). Why?
    Microsoft announced two new phones at the same time this year: The Lumia 735 and 830. It later came out that AT&T would get the 830 and Verizon would get the 735. AT&T will have the 830 hitting the shelves on Friday, November 7th. Verizon seems to have decided to postpone the release of the 735 until after the holiday season (much like the Icon). Oh and by the way, the Lumia 735 is already being released in other countries. Why not Verizon?
    AT&T has not only released their latest windows phones (the Lumia 1020 and 1520) in multiple eye catching colors (just recently adding a pretty sweet green to the 1520 collection), but they update them much timelier then Verizon too.
    I love the Windows Phone OS. If I have to choose between Verizon or Windows Phone, I'll end up choosing Windows Phone on a certain other carrier that actually values the OS that I prefer. I hope Verizon changes their stance before my contract ends this summer.

    VZW has had a negative attitude against Microsoft devices for several years now.  It seems to go back to the Kin.

  • CCMS alert monitoring data for ORACLE is not visible in Central system

    Hello,
    I have installed sapccm4x agents in the CI of the Satellite System and it shows in the Central System as sucessfully registered under Agents for remote System and the RFC Connection test is also successfull. When i check in RZ20 in Central System not all the predefined monitors are visible of the Satellite System in the Central System and mainly the MTE element ORACLE. The database,CI and other instances on the Satellite System are installed on separate hardware. As said the database is installed not with the CI but a standalone.
    Please let us know what needs to be configured in order to get the MTE element of ORACLE to show in the Central System.
    Thanks,
    Vinod Meno

    Bhudev,
    Thanks for the quick respose..
    1.Sapccmsr agent is installed on Java standalone server and it has been sucessfully registered and running and we can grep the process to see its state as well as in the Central System i can see under ccms agents for remote systems it shows and the RFC connection test is also sucessfull.
    2.Yes we are sending the data from the DB to CI first,but we also want the data visible in the Central System mainly for the MTE element Oracle.The filesystem of the Satellite Systems shows up in the Central System but i am intrested to capture the MTE element Oracle since we plan to monitor the tablespaces threhold .
    I am thinking of opening an SAP message but i am trying to see if i can get some info that can give me the result.
    Regards,
    Vinod Menon

  • Use Mobile Data For: Settings - Why does Settings need a cellular data connection?

    iPhone 5 iOS 8.1
    Settings > Mobile > Use Mobile Data For: Settings
    Just curious, why does the iPhone need this turned on? Why does the settings app need a cellular mobile data connection?
    If you turn it off, you're pestered to turn it on every time you go into settings?

    Because, that's the way Siri works...it needs an Internet connection...requests are sent to Apple's servers. No Internet, no Siri.

  • Scheduled finish date for process orders not updating in BW

    We are having problems with the scheduled finish date (GLTRS) for process orders. When the process order is already released, changes done in R/3 on the scheduled finish date will not result to a delta hence data in BW is not updated. Table AFKO, where data is coming from, is always updated with the changes though. 2LIS_04_P_MATNR is used in extracting the data.
    Has anyone experienced the same problem? We are looking for possible ways on how to have a delta whenever there are changes on the process order even after it is already released.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated...

    Hi Donna,
    If I've understood your problem correctly, you can increase the load frequency as Sriee has pointed out.
    If you want latest data frequently and if you are on BI 7.0 then you can look at Real Time Data Acquisition(RDA)
    Regards,
    Tom.

  • Ability to turn on cell data for apps is not available

    So, my girlfriend and I believe that we have run into an interesting issue with which we need help.  We had updated her iPhone 5 to iOS 8.2 a few weeks back. After that, it seemed to be mostly ok as she got used to the new system.  We had updated the system for her because she was having issues with constantly going over her data on her cell plan, so after the update, I turned her cell data off on each app as it became available to do so.  We noticed that, for some reason, those switches would flip over again and again for no reason, but we would just turn them off again.  Over the weekend, she was able to switch the button to allow maps to use cell data, as we were in an area that we have never driven in before, and then she turned the data back off for that app, with no problems.  Yesterday, however, she was by herself in a similar situation. When she went to turn on the cell data for maps, she found that the option was no longer there; and not only for maps - the only options to turn on are for facetime and passbook. She could not even turn on cell data for the App Store so that she could download google maps instead.  Can someone please help to get this back? So far, we have tried combinations of turning overall cell data on and off, LTE on and off, powering off the phone, soft (home/lock together) reset, restoring/upgrading to iOS 8.3 and then bringing everything back through a restore of data.  The last thing I have is doing a full reset and starting from scratch, but I am hoping that there is something else that we can do before that. 

    No, Detect Displays had no effect. However, I made the USB connection from the ACD to the iMac after the system was on. Following a re-start, all controls are available. Thank you for your response.
    P

  • Requirement date for PIR

    Hi Everyone,
    We we create PIR in MD61 by weeks, say plan qty 25 in W38, 2008, the system will automatically assign the requirement date as 2008-09-15 (Monday) in MD04.
    Is it possible to change the date to the last day of the week 38... in this case, 2008-09-21..?
    Thanks,
    Bin

    Hi,
      It is not possible to set the date to the last day of the week as the requirement date.
      If you want every Saturday to be your requirement day, create planning calender with the week starting day as Saturday and assign it in your material master and check up whether it suits with your requirement.
    -Thaila Shree

Maybe you are looking for

  • Copy and paste problem with regions

    I've noticed that occasionally, when I copy and paste a region within the same track, I sometimes paste twice (directly on top of the other region). Or at least that's the end result. When I realize this, I go to delete the region and then there's a

  • CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE update and delete

    dear all, i am trying to understand how to use the CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE to make changes to orders (edits and deletes). it appears there is an old and new style of using this function module. i only have the documentation on the structure passed to the d

  • Requirements to install open suse 10.3 on lenovo3000n200

    hi, would i need a copy of drivers for this machine to install open suse 10.3,or will this operating system be able to auto detect the drivers needed? thanks ellie

  • Solution Manager Project Authorization

    Dear Friends,    I have come across one authorization object namely "S_PROJ_AUTH. What is the importance of this object? In that object, field name, PROJAUTH, system asking me to enter project number. But i know only project name. From where i can th

  • Thumbnails in Project disappear every time

    Most of the time I work with big projects, now for example a project wit 887 different shots. They were not recorded in the right order, so it is a lot of searching trough the project. That is not a problem when you have the thumbnails. But every tim