Reversal After BRS executed FF67

Hi,
i need to know if reversal is possible once BRS is being executed? For example a payment of 2,000 was made to vendor through Bank "ABC" outgoing account. At the month end when bank statement was received it was uploaded manually through "FF67" through "FEBAN" 2,000 of outgoing account was cleared. after it was cleared it turned out that the payment that was made to vendor Through Bank "ABC" was actually to be made through Bank "XYZ" the amount of 2,000 that was cleared through "FEBAN" was not the same. now we need to rectify this and for that we need to first revers the payment document and then make the payment from the original account. but since bank reconciliation has been executed the BRS is now update. how can i reverse the clearing of 2,000 in FEBAN? Is it possible to do so? if yes then please guide me through the process.
Regards,

Hi,
Please upload one more statement with transaction direct or credit for the said amount as the case may be.
Hope, this solves your issue else revert.
Regards,
Tejas

Similar Messages

  • Hi, my Ipod Schuffle (4 gen) dissapears from windows vista right after I execute Itunes, I've change the drive letter, erase temps in App data file, verified USB drivers, etc... Can someone guide on how to solve this?

    Hi, my Ipod Schuffle (4 gen) dissapears from windows vista right after I execute Itunes, I've change the drive letter, erase temps in App data file, verified USB drivers, etc... Can someone guide on how to solve this?

    If you want the shuffle to be always visible in Windows (outside of iTunes), you need to Enable disk use.
    Select the shuffle in the iTunes sidebar, under DEVICES.  Over to the right, select the Summary tab.  You should see a checkbox that says Enable disk use.  Check it and click Apply.
    NOTE:  If disk use is enabled, you have to Eject the shuffle in iTunes, BEFORE you physically disconnect it.  If disk use is NOT enabled, you can disconnect the shuffle at any time, as long as iTunes is not doing something with it at that moment (such as syncing); the shuffle's light will then be blinking (to indicate DO NOT DISCONNECT).
    So, unless you want to use the shuffle like a USB flash drive (carry random files on it), you may want to NOT Enable disk use.

  • System allows GRs to be reversed after invoices have posted and clear

    Users have noticed that it is possible to post a GR, post and clear and Invoice, then reverse the GRs, which is an audibility problem. Previously (possibly before upgrade to ECC 6) this was not possible.Is there any configuration available to change this behavior, or  is it a standard SAP in ECC 6, or if there are unapplied OSS notes that would fix the issue.
    I checked transaction code OMBZ and the movement type 102, 106, 122, and 162 do not have a check on them.
    Is there another way of preventing the Goods Receipts to be reversed after invoices have been posted and cleared?
    Thanks,

    System allows GRs to be reversed after invoices have posted and clear
    Users have noticed that it is possible to post a GR, post and clear and Invoice, then reverse the GRs, which is an audibility problem. Previously (possibly before upgrade to ECC 6) this was not possible.Is there any configuration available to change this behavior, or is it a standard SAP in ECC 6, or if there are unapplied OSS notes that would fix the issue.
    I checked transaction code OMBZ and the movement type 102, 106, 122, and 162 do not have a check on them.
    I also checked the "GR based IV" in the PO item details, inoive tab and that is not checked.
    Invoice have been posted and cleared and now the GRs are reversing them, how to prevent this from happening. Is there a config. solution???
    Thanks,

  • Use remote panel on the web after bulid executable applicatio​n(*.exe)

    Dear All
    i have a vi with using remote control on the web.
    But how can i use remote control on the web after bulid executable application(*.exe)
    maybe add someting to installer or ............

    A simple search for "executable LabVIEW web" should generate some relevant results.
    Try to take over the world!

  • Unload Option (After Step Executes) All subseq steps?

    We have a large number of tests written in TestStand 2010 which, when we run multiple tests, the response from TestStand slows dramatically.  This slowing is most noticable where there are time dependent:
      Time = 0
      WaitTime = 2
        Verify Parameter(X) = Off
        Verify Parameter(Y) = Off
        Verify Parameter(Z) = Off
      WaitTime = 4   FAILS
    When run by itself, the test passes, but when run overnight (or several days), where a large number of tests have been run before this, the test Fails, where the WaitTime has expired.  Multiple tests are typically called, using another "Main" to call the different tests.  1500 to 2000 steps in each test sequence file is typical.
    Basically, as more test are run, test execution slows more and more.  It appears that TestStand is using up system resources (memory).
    All Reporting is OFF (Configure/ReportOptions "Disable Report Generation" is checked
                                   (Configure/ModelOptions "Discard Results or Disable Resutls when not required by Model" is checked.)  (doesn't matter since reporting is off)
    I don't think that it's the reporting that is using the resources.
    I'm suspecting the sequences are not being unloaded after exectuion and using up memory, so that eventually memory is swapped to disk (my computer has 3 GB memory, this is typical for the other systems as well).
    Three Questions:
    1.  I'm investigating TestStand's cache of steps that have been executed.
    In the Step "Run Options" is the "Unload Option".
    Typically we have a "Main" that calls a large number of subsequences, each is an individual test case.
        Can I change the "Unload Option" for these subsequence calls (in the "Main" sequence only) to "Unload after step executes"?  Will this unload all steps that were call recursively to free up the system resources that were used by the subsequence call and down (recursively)?  Or will it just unload THIS step?
    2. I'm aware that there is a "New Execution" that can be used (when complete, unloads all steps), but this doesn't allow passing Parameters to the subsequence easily.
      However, could I use "New Execution" for all those subsequence calls that do NOT require arguments.
    3. Is there another option that I can use to free up system resources more globally?
    Mike

    Mike,
    even though you have switched off the report generation, Teststand is still recording all the results of steps which are set to Record. Therefore you will be filling up the ResultList variable, which usually the cause of TestStand slowing down after longs runs.
    If you dont need to record this data then switch it off in the Configure | StationOptions.. select the Execution Tab. Enable " Disable Result Recording for All Sequences"
    Regards
    Ray Farmer

  • Network Utilization script throws error after re-executing

    Hi everyone, I have a piece of code that finds the network util of a fileserver and if it is over 75% it stops executing the script. The script works the first time but after re-executing it, it throws an error. I've tried to null out all the variables I'm
    using but it still won't work. Any help is appreciated! Thanks!
    Code:
    #Determines NIC utilization
    $interfacebw = $null
    $intbwbytes =$null
    $currentbytespersec = $null
    $linkutil = $null
    Write-Host "Determining File Server Network Utilization.."
    $interfacebw = Get-WmiObject -class Win32_PerfFormattedData_Tcpip_NetworkInterface -ComputerName tsvc2552101x001 | where {$_.Name -eq "Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet"} |select CurrentBandwidth
    $intbwbytes = $interfacebw.currentbandwidth /8
    $currentbytespersec = Get-WmiObject -class Win32_PerfFormattedData_Tcpip_NetworkInterface -ComputerName tsvc2552101x001 | where {$_.Name -eq "Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet"} |select BytesTotalPersec
    [int]$currentbytespersec = $currentbytespersec.bytestotalpersec
    if($currentbytespersec -le 0){
    [int]$linkutil = 0
    }else{
    [int]$linkutil = ($currentbytespersec / $intbwbytes) * 100
    #if NIC util is over 75 then it closes program
    if($linkutil -gt 75){
    $wshell.Popup("Network utilization over 75%, please try again later.",0,"Error",0x1) | Out-Null
    $formSoftwareInstaller.Close()
    return
    Error:
    Cannot convert value "@{BytesTotalPersec=3560}" to type "System.Int32". Error: "Cannot convert the "@{BytesTotalPersec=3560}" value of type "Selected.System.Management.ManagementObject" to type "System.Int32"."
    At C:\Users\cody-horton\Desktop\Software Installer.ps1:406 char:9
    + $currentbytespersec = Get-WmiObject -class Win32_PerfFormattedData_Tcpip ...
    + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    + CategoryInfo : MetadataError: (:) [], ArgumentTransformationMetadataException
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : RuntimeException

    This is all you need to do.  You are way over coding this.
    Write-Host "Determining File Server Network Utilization.."
    $perfdata=Get-WmiObject -class Win32_PerfFormattedData_Tcpip_NetworkInterface -ComputerName tsvc2552101x001 -Filter 'Name="Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet"'
    $intbwbytes=$perfdata.currentbandwidth/8
    $currentbytespersec=$perfdata.BytesTotalPersec
    #if NIC util is over 75 then it closes program
    if(($currentbytespersec / $intbwbytes) -gt .75){
    $wshell.Popup("Network utilization over 75%, please try again later.",0,"Error",0x1) | Out-Null
    $formSoftwareInstaller.Close()
    return
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • Unload after sequence executes for Asynchrono​us VI

    Hello All,
      I have a code module VI, which is reused repeatedly in my test sequence.  I run it asynchronously, perform some other test actions and then stop the VI (with TestStand Property Object calls).  Then I repeat this process several other times in the test sequence.  My question is related to the "Unload Option" for this particular VI.  I am not allowed to change it from "Unload after step executes".  Is this by design?  It seems to me I would want to wait until the sequence completes before I unload it.  If it is unloaded after the step executes, then how do I comunicate with it?  Please clarify the functionality.  Thanks.
    GSinMN   

    The unload option may seem a bit misleading, but since it's a "Run VI Asynchronously" step, the execution will continue while the VI executes. Once the VI stops execution, it will be unloaded from memory.
    Potentially, you could keep the VI running and use a queue or notifier to pause/unpause or update data in the VI as needed. This way, you could kick off the VI at the beginning, either with a Run VI Asynchronously step or a Sequence Call in a new thread, and just send messages to it throughout the test sequence to change its status as needed.
    Regards,
    Brandon V.
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments 

  • Service entry Sheet was reversed after the invoice as posted and rebooked

    Hi..
    Service entry sheet was reversed after the invoice as posted and rebooked with final entry marked.  The rebook transaction created a different $ amount than the original SES.  The difference between the 2 amounts is causing a GRIR out of balance on the PO.  MR11 does not indicate a GRIR out of balance.
    why did SES rebook a different value?
    How can we clean up the GRIR out of  balance?
    Please help...
    Mercy

    This is a standard SAP procedure.
    SAP Note 440942 is helpful to sort this out.
    Thanks,
    Mercy

  • I have a VI A. I want A to call another VI B and execute. After B executes, I want it to close automatically and go back to A. Is this possible ? I tried using open reference and those methods, but I am not able to do it. Can someone help me ? Thanks !

    Thanks !
    Kudos always welcome for helpful posts

    Re: I have a VI A. I want A to call another VI B and execute. After B executes, I want it to close automatically and go back to A. Is this possible ? I tried using open reference and those methods, but I am not able to do it. Can someone help me ? Thanks !Hi Stephan ! Thanks ! I guess I explained my question not so right. I've created a customized menu and at the instance of me selecting a menu, a VI should load itself dynamically. I am using call by reference. Sometimes it works and sometimes it won't. In short, what I want to achieve is load VIs dynamically and close them dynamically once they finish executing. Thanks !
    Kudos always welcome for helpful posts

  • GR reversed after IV & its pmt.

    There are cases where GR is reversed after its invoice is booked & paid
    for.
    1)GR no.5000094870 posted on 26.2.07, invoice booked on & (paid for ) on
    20.3.07 - no. 8103. After this GR is reversed on 30.5.07 - no.
    5000101193
    case 2) GR no.5000098445 posted on 20.4.07, invoice booked on & (paid
    for ) on 30.4.07 - no. 551. After this GR is reversed on 30.5.07 - no.
    5000101192
    One reason could be there is no tick on GR based IV in this case.
    If this is the reason, can we restrict such cases?
    How can we restrict such cases for old PO's???

    Hi
    In the transaction OMBZ , you can configure for the movement type 102 dont check the "reverse GR despite IR". This will help for your requirement.
    Regards,
    Amol

  • Payment reversed after sending client purchase

    Hi. So I sold some items on eBay. 4 people wanted to get refund so I canceled the purchase, but couldn't refund because my funds were in pending balance. I waited couple of days, but the money  still was in  pending balance. After that I contacted PayPal support and asked to refund certain transactions on my behalf as suggested by support on facebook. After a while I saw that only 2 transactions were reversed. Then I noticed that one of those reversed transactions was from successfully sold & shipped  item and I didn't ask paypal to refund this particular transaction. What should I do ?How can I get my money back ?

    Yes Robert you are right,
    If you select the tick box the SAP system will generate a seperate line as per business area.
    But business requirement is :
    User wants both, after executing the APP,payament document should be generated in seperate lines for all the involvesd business areas, where as in DME file it must summerize the value of a particular Vendor,
    Regards
    Edited by: tabassum naaz on Jul 2, 2010 4:01 PM

  • Status DLV/TECO was reversed after settlement of period 005/2009

    Dear friends,
    User is getting this error, when they do the Settlement in KO88.
    They are revoking some Process Order status from TECO to DLV after the settlement becasue of some adjustments are pending for that process orders.
    I suggested that Reverse the settlement and do the necessary adjustments and rerun the settlement as per the business process.
    But in this current period, they changed the Process order status from DLV to TECO. So that they are not getting above error.
    Now they are asking why we need to reverse the settlement and do rerun the settlement.
    So how to convince the user in this regards.
    Please sugget me.
    Raju

    Hi Raju,
    When in previous period user had done TECO and Settlement for a particular Process Order, system might have already posted the Variances on that Order in that Period.
    Think of this situtaion...If the user did TECO by mistake for an Order which was in CNF stage during last period, system had posted variances during that period. Ideally, if there is no GR against that Process Order, the Cost loaded onto that Order till the last date of previous period should go to WIP of that Period. But, because, by mistake User did TECO and Settled, system had posted Variances.
    Now, during the current period, if the User simply revers the TECO and posts some costs, does TECO again and Settle, system will not object but what about the "treatment of costs" system has done during last month...? Instead of treating the cost (at the time of Settlement during last month) as WIP and showing it in Balance Sheet as Current Asset (System calculates and posts WIP for Order with neither TECO nor DLV statuses), system had posted Variances to Price Difference Account (P&L Debit) as well as to COPA.
    If you want to "reverse" the "effect that has taken place during the last month's Settlement", you must reverse the Settlement (of last month), TECO in the current month and post the costs to the Order.
    Still, if there is no GR happened till the end of the current month, the Order will not be of status DLV/TECO. So, when User tries to Settle the Order in the current period, WIP will be posted by the system. If the User changes the status of the Order to TECO in the current month, obviously system will calculate Variances.
    It's all at the discretion of the User whether to reverse the previous settlement. You need to explain the User clearly the "treatment of costs" done by the system during last month so that they can take wise decision...
    Revert back for further explanation...
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • PO Commitment Reversing after 102 Mov Type

    Dear All,
    Please suggest a wayout for the below issue.
    Issue:
       When we are reversing Goods Receipt with 102 Movement Type, system reversing the total commitment created at the time of PO
    Scanario:
    The illustrated Example will give the complete information about the scenario and issue which i am facing.
    Step1: Assignment of Budget
              Fund Center :      12345
              Commitment Item:   CITEM
              Budget Amount:     50000
    Note:   I've Used the Symbol " | " to differciate the Values as Space is not showing in the posted Message
    Step2:  Material PO Created with Special Procurement Type Q
       For Ex:   Material     |  Qty   |     PO Value |   Commitment Created (Budget Consumed in RS)
                       ABC        |   10    |       10000    |                    10000
    Step3: when i see the FMB_PT01 report after PO Creation.
            Budget  |   Bud-Pay  |    Invoice   |   Bud-INV    |       Open Item    |   Res Budget
            50000   |          0       |          0      |          0         |            10000    |      40000
    Step3:  Goods Received against the above PO is 10 Qty for which Rs.10000 which is showing as follows in FMB_PT01
           Budget  |   Bud-Pay  |   Invoice   |    Bud-INV     |   Open Item |   Res Budget
           50000   |         0        |      10000 |        10000    |            0      |        40000
    Step4:  If i reverse the above GR then system is deleting all the consumed amounts and showing as follows
           Budget  |   Bud-Pay  |   Invoice    |    Bud-INV    |     Open Item  |  Res Budget
           50000   |        0         |        0        |          0          |           0         |      50000
    As far as my knowledge, if i reverse the GR, system should only reset the Values under Invoice & Bud-Inv and reassign the value under Open Item, which is not happening in our scenario.
    I hope, you all understood the scenario & issue which i am trying explain.
    So, please suggest me wht went wrong and how to rectify that..
    Thanks in Advance to All.
    Edited by: RAJA TALLURI on Nov 2, 2010 6:33 PM

    Dear Alex,
    Thank you so much for the information
    I've checked the note given by you, 1282074 this is only relevant for Amount type 0300 or it will rectify the error w.r.t amount type 0500 (Adjusted by Followon Document)
    Actually, wht happening is say for example:
      When i created the PO, in the report it will show amount type as 0100 (Original)
        and when i created GR w.r.t the PO, system should show as follows.
        At the PO 2 lines should be shown,,
             1. with Amount Type 0100 &
             2. line with Amount type 0500 which is not happening
      in the place of amount type 0500 system showing 0200 (Reduction) which is wrong.
    will the above specified note, solve this issue also or is there any other note .
    Thanks.

  • How to stop MR8M  reversal after  paying tax (TDS ) on that document

    Hello experts ,
    As Miro document can be reversed (MR8M)  after paying tax on , like TDS  and our requirement is ones we paid the tax on that particular document  it should not be reversed .
    like in transaction FB08 first we have to reset  cleared items ,then only system will allow to reverse .
    same thing we are expecting for transaction MR8M.
    how this can be achieved  ?
    thanks in advance
    Sachin

    Thanks alex for your quick reply
    But i am not able to relate BTE 1050 to restrict MR8M , can you please elaborate it in detail .
    As i want to do this work without taking help of ABAPer   please help .
    thanks
    sachin

  • GR Reversal after posting invoice and paying Vendor

    Hi MM Friends,
    Is it possible in SAP standard  functionality that we can do a GR reversal and post GR again after the PO is invoiced and paid to Vendor ? We did like this in our system and it accepted. We think system would have thrown some error message or Information message, but it did not. Pl let us know.
    Thanks
    Niranjan

    Thanks to both Indranil and Jurgen for taking time and answering my question. That solved my issue.

Maybe you are looking for