RG23C ISSUE

Dear Gurus,
Client is having the requirement in which Excise dept want to post receipt & consumption of capital goods in RG23C Part1 whenever their is a goods receipt &
Store dept want to maintain the inventory of capital goods (suppose bearings)
As far as my understanding is concern either we can maintain inventory & receipt entry is RG23C part1
(After issue their is consumption entry) OR
receipt & consumption entry in RG23C Part but not possible to maintain inventory.
Please suggest..............
Thanks & Regards
AKSHAY
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Jan 7, 2009 6:34 AM
Edited by: akshay sonurkar on Jan 7, 2009 6:41 AM

Hi,
You can post the receipt & issue thru J1I5 for RG23 C also.
Pl. try
Regards,
Vikas

Similar Messages

  • RG23C-Part -I Serial Number Updation-Issue

    Hi CIN Gurus,
            I am facing a problem in excise sap 4.7 version, wherein if I do the capital goods receipt via MIGO and also capturing excise invoice or creating only part-I entry along with it , the system is giving me 2 serial numbers with receipt and issue indicator for the MIGO Material document number in Table J_1IPART1.
           My client is not agreeing with the concept of two serial numbers for the same transaction and also in the PART-I register system is giving the serial number with receipt indicator.  The client is reluctant to accept because there will be a gap in the excise serial number Part-I  which is  not acceptabe for excise authorities.
            Is there any remedy for making it to 1 serial number.
    Thanks in advance and points will be suitably rewarded.
    Regards
    Gopal

    Hi Gurus,
    Any updation or some reply on this thread.
    Please share your thoughts .
    rgds
    Swamy

  • Mutiple Goods Issue happening for Asset Goods Receipt.

    Hi all
    I have created an asset PO for 1 computer by assigning A as a Account assignment Category.
    I have given the asset number and order number(single assignement) in accout assigment tab to which 1 computer is to be issued.
    I made GR for 1 computer in MIGO with 101 mvmt type also captured excise invoice.
    When I tried to post the excise invoice, I checked for Part 1 updation under part 1tab here I found that 1 computer Receipt is happened in 1st line, the same is issued in 2nd line AND THE PROBLEM IS AGAIN THE SAME 1 COMPUTER IS ISSUED IN 3RD AND 4TH LINE.
    IN TOTAL
    GR - 1 NO
    GI  - 3 NOS
    SHORTAGE - 2 NOS
    I posted it and while I see the updated RG23C regiter for part 1
    I found 1 receipt qty, then 3 issue qty and finally in Total quantity in Stock i found 2.000- (that is -2).  How it is happening and how to rectify this.
    Pls help.
    INFO: Only one material document is generated for the receipt and all issues.  Also unable to track it in MM stock report as it is non-valuated material.
    Regards
    Srini

    Awaiting replies from the experts.

  • Excise is getting post to RG23A instead RG23C for capital goods return del

    Hi SAP Guru,
    I have very critical issue to be resolved emmediatly in the area of Excise for CAPITAL GOODS, please help! the things is....
    1. At GR level using mvt 101, system is posting all BEDECSSECess to correct RG23C register, fine
    Quality people has rejected goods,When i'm trying to create vendor return delivery using......
    GR(122)>J1IS>J1IV,, useing this process system is posting BED+ECS to RG23C but SECess to RG23A, i wanted to know why SECess is getting post in RG23A instead RG23C. plz suggest if any config. chages to be done.
    or
    2. when i am trying GR(122) along with all Excise parameter, system is throwing error "RG23C-AT1 amount 1600.00 is greater than the available amount 0.00". when is checked the relevent register i found out enough balance.
    or
    3. After GR (122), when i'm using J1IH(JV) method, system is thowing error like " Balance in transaction currency 'Message no. F5702'.
    Now plz suggest the correct answer!
    Thanks & Regards
    Manoj K Singh
    +91 9940216442

    Hi Datta, thanks for the reply
    according to SAP Note 1062872 (2005B version) it reads as
    "The excise register for excisable items of type raw materials/finished goods is currently set to RG32A Part I. When you create an out going excise invoice with these type of items, the accumulator for RG32A Part I will be increased."
    I thought the same is applicable with SAP Business One 2007B version.  However what you said might be correct.  But the problem with one of my manufacturing client is whenever they raising an Outgoing Excise invoice  they have registered numbers automatically be created on the pre printed invoice paper.  where the invoice will be printed only with the qty, rate , price and register numbers rest of the information on the document is pre-printed.  So they have a column called RG23C Part I / II where register numbers are automatically printed.  But RG23C Part I & II are for "Capital Goods"
    If I consider these manufactured items as "capital goods" then it will raise register numbers automatically.  but this will not acceptable.  correct me if i am wrong.  so all of these items should be cosidered as Finished Goods in the item master data.  if i do that again there is a conflict with their RG23C Part I / II on the pre-printed column and i wont be raising any register numbers. 
    Please update me on how should I deal with this issue
    SV Reddy

  • CIN -  Monthly Excise Duty Debit issue

    Dear SAP SD Guy.
    I have one issue while debiting monthly excise duty from RG23A part II. Details given is as under.
    I have selected T. Code J1IH -  select other adjustment  -  put doc. no and comapny code, plant excise group - select RG23A part II  -   then enter -
    go to next page put duty amount such as Rs 10000.00 -  select header - enter  then   select G/L account which is giving correct G/L account at both line and then save ( Here once save it should save and give jv and account no with sr no of RG 23 A part II)
    But once save again pop up appearing with PLA G/L account no in first line and in the second line modvat clearing G/L account no. ( Actually it should not appear. How this is appearing where is the configuration setting?)
    Once save duty is debited from PLA whereas we have selected RG23A part II once use other adjustment and put details because of second pop up of PLA.
    Can anybody help me how this second POP Up -  PLA G/L account apearing in the system? where is the setting configured or any debugging is required?
    Please seek your early solution and give reward points for early solutions.

    First you will have to update all your registers i.e RG1,RG23A& RG23C part I. using transaction J1I5,
    Then use the J2I5  extract registers to update the value in RG23A & RG23C part II
    J2IUN  transaction for monthly utilization.
    U will see excise payable against which you will see bakances in different registers you can select the register from which you have to utilize the exice duty.
    I think you can now utilize the credit taken.
    Reward If useful.
    Regards

  • Error in excise JV debiting RG23C basic+Cess to RG23C cenvat on hold

    pl Hi experts
    Facing below error in excise JV
    XXXXXX G/L account is not identified in the General Ledger Master
    Steps
    J1IH-Other Adjustment
    Modvat a/c selection:RG23C
    On clicking Determination of GL account following GL a/c are appearing
    RG23C Basic ED     Dr
    RG23C Cess           Dr
    RG23C S Cess       Dr
    Cenvat clearing         Cr
    When I am replacng Cenvat clearing GL with RG23C Cenvat on Hold above error is there i.e.
    XXXXXX G/L account is not identified in the General Ledger Master
    Pl help where is the issue as G/L of RG23C Cenvat on Hold is required to be debited
    thanks in advance

    Can you post the message number ?
    Also your post related to excise, you should choose correct forum..
    cc Jyoti Sir.
    Regards
    Dev

  • Excise Group and Excise Register issue

    Hi Friends,
    We have internal order budgeting for consumables.whenever we make purchase order , the account assignment category is F and we purcahse against the particular internal order.when G/R is done the consumable material gets cosnumed against the particular interla order. ie goods receipt and the issue against the internal order with same movement type.
    IF the material is exciseable then excise part 1 register shows receipt and removed quantity .please suggest how to avoid the removal entry in part 1 register. only receipt has to be updated in the part 1 not the removal ie goods issue.
    and
    at the same time we have std. purchasing also. we maintian one excise group for plant
    and excise group i maintain consumption check box. 
    at the time of register system shows only one type of procurment data . how to handle this senario.
    go for other excise group need to be maintained or else one excise group is sufficeent 
    pls explain step by step.

    Hi Akhil,
    Thanks for ur reply
    i am not understood "3" their is no option in selection "3" at excise group part1 posting trigger(consumption) only.
    here business line are different
    senario 1: i am purchasing material for internal order (while i made GR , auto GI).
    theirs is sales order or MRP direct create PO manual. (here excise group removed for consumption).
    senario 2: i am purchasing material for stock (std.) (while i made GR stock goes to MMBE, after i goods issue to certain reservation based).
    for std process i maintain excise group (consumption check box maintained).
    in RG23a or RG23C both part1 and part2 will need to be updated.
    so how can i map single excise group for two senarios.

  • Register RG23C not getting updated

    Dear Frirnds,
                     Hello! Pl guide me in the following case:
    I am transfering the <b>excisable goods</b> from plant 1 to plant 2 under the same company code by using <b>STO without delivery.</b>
    I did goods issue with 351 mvt in plant 1
    made excise invoice in J1IS in plant 1
    did GR in plant 2.
    captured the excise invocie in plant 2
    <b>the register RG23C part 1 and 2 of the issuing plant 1 are not getting updated?</b>
    Pl help
    Thanks and regards
    Kavita

    Thanks Sai,
                   since I am transfering excisable material from plant 1 to plant2.
    in this case plant 1 cannot take the cenvat credit of material as it is not used to produce the finished product in plant1.
    hence in this case, when i am transfering the excisable material from plant 1 to plant 2,the  plant 2 will take the benefit of cenvat.
    in short : it is the case of transfering the credit from one plant to another when we are transfering the excisable goods.
    so in this case, the system should take out the value from register in plant 1 and post in plant 2.
    when i did GR (capture and post excise invocie) in plant2, the debit enteries are refelected in plant 2 registers.
    but no enteries are appearing in plant 1 registers
    Am I doing the wrong process steps.
    pl guide what is the right way of doing this process?
    thanks and regards
    Kavita

  • Error in j2i6 with rg23c part1

    hii all,
         i am doing j2i6 for rg23C part1.and got  that material document is different in MB51 than  j2i6 (rg23c part1).
         i am looking RG23C Part1 with  j2i6 , against my XXX material, on 20th may its showing 50 qty recieved for a plant and 50 qty issued for a cost center., but in balance of stock recieved qty is not updating.
    parallely, checked MB51 also, here also recieved qty is not showing, only its showing issued qty.
    plz help me.

    got solution.....
    now m closing this thread.

  • RG23C On Hold Balance Upload

    Dear All,
    How to upload the 50% balance of RG23C which we are going to post in Cenvat On Hold account in production system.
    Request you all to reply at the earliest.
    Regards,
    Bhadresh

    Hi,
    Please check if you enable conferencing in topology builder, you can check on the Standard edition topology below “Feature and functionality”.
    Please also try to re-run the Lync Server Components install from the Deployment Wizard and check services again.
    If the issue persists, you can use the Lync server logging tool on FE server to test the process of conferencing.
    Here is the link of using the Lync logging tool:
    http://blog.schertz.name/2011/06/using-the-lync-logging-tool/
    Note: Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. The sites are not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or information found there. Please make
    sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any suggestions from the above link.
    Best Regards,
    Eason Huang
    Eason Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • What is the importance of Rcpt/Issu classification codes in J1I5 transaction

    Dear CIN experts,
    I search lot for mentioned subject. But not cleared with what is the significance of classification, what it has effect if I select IIM or IPD etc.
    Kindly share the information related to this.
    Thanks & regards
    Subhash

    Hi
    The Mentioned Classifications are helpful to update the RG23A Part 1 and RG23C Part 1  Registers.
    Based on receipts and issues only we can update J1I5.
    Suppose if your receipts are less and issue are high in the table level(J_1IRGSUM) then while updating the J1I5 system won't allow to update the register.
    So Receipts and Issues are most important while updating the Registers.

  • Budget 2007-08 issue- CIN

    Hi,
         In the budget 2007-2008, there is introduction of Sec Education cess of 1%.
    we have proceeded as per the master sap note 1032265 for budget 2007-08.
    <b>issue</b>
    the value of secondary education cess is not getting transfered to the register., means the value is not getting loaded in the registers.
    as an example
    if my BED is RS16, Educ Cess is RS 0.32 and secondary educ cess is Rs 0,16 on PO of Rs 100, then
    Rs 16 and Rs 0.32 is getting update in cenvat regsister but not RS0.16
    please help
    regards
    Ajay

    dear santosh,
      since we are in ITG phase of project, i am capturing excise invoice in MIGO and then doing MIRO.
    then J2I6 - Print Utility program
    then i am selecting RG23C PART 2.
    i see the sum of BED and education cess not the secondary edu cess
    thanks and regards
    Ajay

  • New DVR Issues (First Run, Channel Switching, etc.)

    I've spent the last 30 minutes trying to find answers through the search with no luck, so sorry if I missed something.
    I recently switched to FIOS from RCN cable in New York.  I've gone through trying to setup my DVR and am running into issues and was hoping for some answers.
    1.  I setup two programs to record at 8PM, I was watching another channel at the time and only half paying attention.  Around 8:02 I noticed a message had popped up asking if I would like to switch channels to start recording.  I was expecting it to force it to switch like my old DVR, but in this case it didn't switch and I missed the first two minutes of one of the shows.  I typically leave my DVR on all day and just turn off the TV, this dual show handling will cause issues with that if I forget to turn off the DVR.  Is there a setting I can change that will force the DVR to choose one of the recording channels?
    2.  I setup all my recordings for "First Run" because I only want to see the new episodes.  One show I setup was The Daily Show on comedy central, which is shown weeknights at 11pm and repeated 3-4 times throughout the day.  My scheduled recordings is showing all these as planned recordings even though only the 11pm show is really "new".  Most of the shows I've setup are once a week so they aren't a problem, but this seems like it will quickly fill my DVR.  Any fixes?
    Thanks for the help.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I came from RCN about a year ago.  Fios is different in several ways, not all of them desirable.  Here are several ways to get--and fix--unwanted recordings from a series recording setup.
    Some general principles. 
    Saving changes.  When you originally create a series with options, or if you go back to edit the options for an existing series, You MUST save the Series Options changes.  Pretty much everywhere else in the user interface, when you change an option, the change takes effect immediately--but not in Series Options.  Look at the Series Options window.  Look at the far right side.  There is a vertical "Save" bar, which you must navigate to and click OK on to actually save your changes.  Exiting the Series Options window without having first saved your changes loses all your attempted changes--immediately.
    Default Series Options.  This is accessed  from [Menu]--DVR--Settings--Default Series Options.  This will bring up the series options that will automatically be applied to the creation of a NEW series. The options for every previously created series will not be affected by a subsequent modification of the Default Series Options.  You should set these options to the way you would like them to be for the majority of series recordings that you are likely to create.  Be sure to SAVE your changes.  This is what you will get when you select "Create Series Recording" from the Guide.  When creating a new series recording where you think that you may want options different from the default, select "Create Series with Options" instead.  Series Options can always be changed for any individual series set up later--but not for all series at once.
    Non-series recordings.  With Fios you have no directly available options for these.  With RCN and most other DVRs, you can change the start and end times for individual episodes, including individual episodes that are also in a series.  With Fios, your workarounds are to create a series with options for a single program, then delete the series later;  change the series options if the program is already in a series, then undo the changes you made to the series options later; or schedule recordings of the preceding and/or following shows as needed.
    And now, to the unwanted repeats. 
    First, make sure your series options for the specific series in question--and not just the series default options--include "First Run Only".  If not, fix that and SAVE.  Then check you results by viewing the current options using the Series Manager app under the DVR menu.
    Second, and most annoying, the Guide can have repeat programs on your channel tagged as "New".  It happens.  Set the series option "Air Time" to "Selected Time".  To make this work correctly, you must have set up the original series recording after selecting the program in the Guide at the exact time of a first run showing (11pm, in your case), and not on a repeat entry in the Guide.  Then, even it The Daily Show is tagged as New for repeat showings, these will be ignored. 
    Third, another channel may air reruns of the program in your series recording, and the first showing of a rerun episode on the other channel may be tagged as "New".  These can be ignored in your series if you set the series option "Channel" to "Selected Channel".  Related to this, if there is both an SD and HD channel broadcasting you series program, you will record them both if the series option "Duplicates" is set to "Yes".  However, when the Channel option is set to "Selected Channel", the Duplicates Option is always effectively "No", regardless of what shows up on the options screen.  
    As for you missing two minutes,  I have sereral instances in which two programs start recording at the same time.  To the best of my recollection, whenever the warning message has appeared, ignoring it has not caused a loss of recording time.  You might have an older software version.  Newest is v.1.8.  Look at Menu--Settings--System Info.  Or, I might not have noticed the loss of minutes.  I regularly see up to a minute of previous programming at the start of a recording, or a few missing seconds at the beginning or end of a recording.  There are a lot of possibilities for that, but the DVR clock being incorrect is not one of them.  With RCN, the DVR clocks occasionally drifted off by as much as a minute and a half.

  • Pension issue Mid Month Leaving

    Dear All,
    As per rule sustem should deduct mid month joining/leaving/absences or transfer scenarios, the Pension/PF Basis will be correspondingly prorated. But our system is not doing this. In RT table i have found 3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00.
    Employee leaving date is 14.04.2010. system is picking pension amout as 541. Last year it was coming right.
    Please suggest.
    Ashwani

    Dear Jayanti,
    We required prorata basis pension in case of left employees and system is not doing this. This is the issue. As per our PF experts Pension amount should come on prorata basis for left employees in case they left mid of month.System is doing prorata basis last year but from this year it is deducting 541. I am giving two RT cases of different years.
    RT table for year 2010. DOL 26.04.2010
    /111 EPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /139 VPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00             509.00 
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00          12,600.00 
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 01/2010                    0.00              96.25 
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00 
    /3F4 Er Pension contributio 01/2010                    0.00             541.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3R3 Metro HRA Basis Amount 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    1BAS Basic Salary           01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    RT table for year 2009. DOL 27.10.2009
                                                                                    /111 EPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /139 VPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00             628.00
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           8,822.00
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 07/2009                    0.00              99.18
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3R4 Non-metro HRA Basis Am 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    1BAS Basic Salary           07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    Now please suggest what to do. where is the problem  ? If have also checked EXIT_HINCALC0_002 but nothing written in it.
    With Regards
    Ashwani

  • Open PO Analysis - BW report issue

    Hello Friends
    I constructed a query in BW in order to show Open Purchase Orders. We have custom DSO populated with standard
    datasource 2lis_02_itm (Purcahse Order Item). In this DSO we mapped the field ELIKZ to the infoobject 0COMP_DEL
    (Delivery completed).
    We loaded the data from ECC system for all POs and found the following issue for Stock Transport Purchase orders (DocType = UB).
    We have a PO with 4 line items. For line items 10 and 20, Goods issued, Goods received and both the flags "Delivery
    complete" and "Final delivery" checked. For line items 30 and 40, only delivery indicator note is issued for zero
    quantity and Delivery complete flag is checked (Final delivery flag is not checked) in ECC system. For this PO, the
    delivery completion indicator is not properly updated in the DSO for line items 30 and 40. The data looks like the
    following:
    DOC_NUM     DOC_ITEM       DOCTYPE     COMP_DEL
    650000001       10     UB        X
    650000001       20     UB        X
    650000001       30     UB
    650000001       40     UB      
    When we run the Open PO analysis report on BW side this PO is appearing in the report but the same is closed in ECC
    system.
    Any help is appreciated in this regard.
    Thanks and Regards
    sampath

    Hi Priya and Reddy
       Thanks for your response.
                         Yes the indicator is checked in EKPO table for items 30 and 40 and delta is running regularly for more than 1 year and no issues with other POs. This is happening only for few POs of type Stock Transport (UB).
                        I already checked the changes in ME23N and the Delivery completed indicator was changed and it reflected in EKPO table. Further, i checked the PSA records for this PO and i am getting the records with the Delivery completed flag but when i update from PSA to DSO the delivery completed indicator is not updating properly.
                       In PSA, for item 30 i have the following entries. Record number 42 is capturing the value X for ELIKZ but after that i am getting two more records 43 and 44 with process key 10 and without X for ELIKZ. I think this is causing the problem.
    Record No.    Doc.No.                    Item              Processkey         Rocancel     Elikz
        41               6500000001            30                    11                            X           ---    
        42               6500000001            30                    11                            ---           X
        43               6500000001            30                    10                            X           ---
        44               6500000001            30                    10                            ---         ---
    (Here --- means blank)        
    Thanks and Regards
    sampath

Maybe you are looking for

  • Archive tasks in Ical

    How do you archive completed tasks in Ical in Lion?

  • Upgrade help for G3 350Mhz OS 10.0.4 to 10.1.5

    I've been loaned a Connon PowershotA520 digital camera that requires OS X 10.1.5 to operate camera with my machine. An older B&W G3 350Mhz. with 128MB installed RAM, running Classic 9.1. and OS X 10.0.4 on same hard drive. What is the easiest and lea

  • JPA: mapping circular references

    Hi all, I'm trying to map a simple parent-to-children-knows-parent scenario, which contains circular references, using JPA annotations. Here is the current code: @Entity public class Assortment implements Identifiable {      @Id      @GeneratedValue

  • Specified Crop and Bleed marks staying in place, when scaling in proportion?

    Hello, A colleague of mine asked me a question I could not figure out... In CS5.5 and below, if he had a document that let's say had a .5" bleed and he printed the document at 50%, the bleed marks would also scale in proportion and be .25". Now in CS

  • Trying to copy backups.backupdb to another drive

    When I try to copy this file, I get the following: "The backup can't be copied because the backup volume doesn't have ownership enabled." I went to command-i, for get info, and enabled read-write priviledges for the file and sub folder but still get