RRI Jumps from Different Characteristics Produce Different Results

Hi experts,
I am having the problem that when I jump from different characteristics in the same row in sender query, I got different result sets. E.g. when I choose "Go to" from the "Name" char I got one record, but from "Transaction Description" char multiple records.
Could anyone please clarify this problem?
Thanks,
Joon

Hi,
check the info object mapping in RSBBS.   some time same kind of charactorstics is available in the destination report it show such kind of error.
Eg.   0customer to 0ship_to_party , or sold to party ect.
Just go to RSBBS
select the type as infoobject ...
Field name   = target field
for more clarification please refer below link
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/607e63d5-b56f-2c10-718f-8e33a08baa89?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
regards
bvr

Similar Messages

Output from same script on two different platforms produce different outputs.

I'm running a command prompt script on two different platforms (Windows 7 desktop and a Microsoft Server 2008 R2 Enterprise platform) and the output the script produces is different on each platform.
Specifically; the script is
For /f "tokens=2-4 delims=/ " %%a in ('date /t') do (set mydate=%%c-%%a-%%b)
For /f "tokens=1-2 delims=/:" %%a in ('time /t') do (set mytime=%%a%%b)
echo %mydate%>> log.txt
echo %mytime%>> log.txt
and the output from the Windows 7 desktop is:
2014-07-31
0249 PM
While the output from the 2008 server is:
ECHO is on.
0249 PM

Hi Dave,
There's some very good learning resources here:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/scriptcenter/dd793612.aspx
Also, there's a script repository full of examples you can learn from and tweak to meet your needs here:
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter
As an additional suggestion, I'd highly recommend upgrading PowerShell on Win7 and WS2008R2 to v4. v2 was okay, but v4 makes life much easier (make sure you read the system requirements first though, there's still a few incompatibilities):
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=40855
Don't retire TechNet! -
(Don't give up yet - 12,950+ strong and growing)

Analytic function should produce different results

Hi All
My question is derived by a usage of the analytic functions with "sliding window". Let's say you have a table as
GROUP_ID SEQ VALUE
1 1 1
1 1 2
2 2 3
2 3 4
Then the query
select sum( value ) over ( partition by group_id order by group_id, seq ) from a_table
should produce different values for different runs because rows 1,2 have the same value of SEQ. One run may produce 2 then 1 another one may produce 1 then 2.
I need to prove it if the statement above is true. Oracle caches data so if run it several times you will see the same result.
Thanks.

Why are you using group_id twice, in partition and order by? And why would several "runs" on the same data provide different results?
C.

RRI JUMP issue in QAS

Hi Gurus,
My RRI jump from Sumary query to Detail query is working fine in DEV. But when I moved the transport with same settings to QAS it is not working, getting message "Data not found", but actually the data is there in the Cube. Is it pointing to different source system ?. How do I check.
Please let me know what could be the reason ?.
Thanks
Liza

Hi Liza,
Can u pls check which target system u have given in the Maintain Sender/Reciever Assignment setting. For your case it should be loacal.
Secondly Please review the field assignment details in how u are propagating from summarise to detail veiw.
Please check the below article :
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/607e63d5-b56f-2c10-718f-8e33a08baa89?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
please revert if more questions
Thanks,
Deepak

Can multiple RRI jump targets co-exist in Web Appl.

Hi,
I have a Web Appl. with multiple jump targets. When jump to first target, system create a new window for the target report. When I go back to the main report to jump to 2nd jump target. System reuses the same sub report window to display the 2nd jump target report. It means I can have only one target report open. Is there way to work around the problem to have multiple jump target reports open at the same time?
Thanks,
Frank

Hi Frank,
You could do a CTRL+N on your sender report for it to open up in a new window, and then do the second RRI jump from here..but this way you will have one extra window for each target report displayed. Does this hapen even if you ALT-TAB back to the sender report?

Old outer join syntax produces different results from new syntax!

I have inherited a query that uses the old outer join syntax but that is yielding correct results. When I translate it to the new outer join syntax, I get the results I expect, but they are not correct! And I don't understand why the old syntax produces the results it produces. Bottom line: I want the results I'm getting from the old syntax, but I need it in the new syntax (I'm putting it into Reporting Services, and RS automatically converts old syntax to new).
Here's the query with the old outer join syntax that is working correctly:
Code Snippet
SELECT   TE = COUNT(DISTINCT T1.ID),
         UE = COUNT(DISTINCT T2.ID),
         PE = CONVERT(MONEY, COUNT(DISTINCT T2.ID)) /
              CONVERT(MONEY,COUNT(DISTINCT T1.ID))
FROM     TABLE T1, TABLE T2
WHERE    T1 *= T2
In this query, much to my surprise, TE <> UE and PE <> 1. However, TE, UE, and PE seem to be accurate!
Here's the query with the new outer join syntax that is working but not producing the results I need:
Code Snippet
SELECT   TE = COUNT(DISTINCT T1.ID),
         UE = COUNT(DISTINCT T2.ID),
         PE = CONVERT(MONEY, COUNT(DISTINCT T2.ID)) /
              CONVERT(MONEY,COUNT(DISTINCT T1.ID))
FROM     TABLE T1 LEFT OUTER JOIN TABLE T2 ON T1.ID = T2.ID
Though not producing the results I need, it is producing what would be expected: TE = UE and PE = 1.
My questions:
1) Can someone who is familiar enough with the old syntax please help me understand why TE <> UE and PE <> 1 in the first query?
2) Can someone please tell me how to properly translate the first query to the new syntax so that it continues to produce the results in the first query?
Thank you very much.

How can we reproduce the issue?
Code Snippet
USE [master]
GO
EXEC sp_dbcmptlevel Northwind, 80
GO
USE [Northwind]
GO
SELECT
TE
= COUNT(DISTINCT T1.OrderID),
UE = COUNT(DISTINCT T2.OrderID),
PE = CONVERT(MONEY, COUNT(DISTINCT T2.OrderID)) /
CONVERT(MONEY,COUNT(DISTINCT T1.OrderID))
FROM
dbo
.Orders T1, dbo.Orders T2
WHERE
T1
.OrderID *= T2.OrderID
SELECT
TE
= COUNT(DISTINCT T1.OrderID),
UE = COUNT(DISTINCT T2.OrderID),
PE = CONVERT(MONEY, COUNT(DISTINCT T2.OrderID)) /
CONVERT(MONEY,COUNT(DISTINCT T1.OrderID))
FROM
dbo
.Orders T1
LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.Orders T2
ON T1.OrderID = T2.OrderID
GO
EXEC sp_dbcmptlevel Northwind, 90
GO
Result:
TE
UE
PE
830
830
1.00
TE
UE
PE
830
830
1.00
As you can see, I am getting same results.
AMB

Filter expression producing different results after upgrade to 11.1.1.7

Hello,
We recently did an upgrade and noticed that on a number of reports where we're using the FILTER expression that the numbers are very inflated. Where we are not using the FILTER expression the numbers are as expected. In the example below we ran the 'Bookings' report in 10g and came up with one number and ran the same report in 11g (11.1.1.7.0) after the upgrade and got two different results. The data source is the same database for each envrionment. Also, in running the physical SQL generated by the 10g and 11g version of the report we get different the inflated numbers from the 11g SQL. Any ideas on what might be happening or causing the issue?
10g report: 2016-Q3......Bookings..........72,017
11g report: 2016-Q3......Bookings..........239,659
This is the simple FILTER expression that is being used in the column formula on the report itself for this particular scenario which produces different results in 10g and 11g.
FILTER("Fact - Opportunities"."Won Opportunity Amount" USING ("Opportunity Attributes"."Business Type" = 'New Business'))
-------------- Physical SQL created by 10g report -------- results as expected --------------------------------------------
WITH
SAWITH0 AS (select sum(case when T33142.OPPORTUNITY_STATUS = 'Won-closed' then T33231.USD_LINE_AMOUNT else 0 end ) as c1,
T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME as c2,
T28761.QUARTER_RANK as c3
from
XXFI.XXFI_GL_FISCAL_MONTHS_V T28761 /* Dim_Periods */ ,
XXFI.XXFI_OSM_OPPTY_HEADER_ACCUM T33142 /* Fact_Opportunity_Headers(CloseDate) */ ,
XXFI.XXFI_OSM_OPPTY_LINE_ACCUM T33231 /* Fact_Opportunity_Lines(CloseDate) */
where ( T28761.PERIOD_NAME = T33142.CLOSE_PERIOD_NAME and T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME = '2012-Q3' and T33142.LEAD_ID = T33231.LEAD_ID and T33231.LINES_BUSINESS_TYPE = 'New Business' and T33142.OPPORTUNITY_STATUS <> 'Duplicate' )
group by T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME, T28761.QUARTER_RANK)
select distinct SAWITH0.c2 as c1,
'Bookings10g' as c2,
SAWITH0.c1 as c3,
SAWITH0.c3 as c5,
SAWITH0.c1 as c7
from
SAWITH0
order by c1, c5
-------------- Physical SQL created by the same report as above but in 11g (11.1.1.7.0) -------- results much higher --------------------------------------------
WITH
SAWITH0 AS (select sum(case when T33142.OPPORTUNITY_STATUS = 'Won-closed' then T33142.TOTAL_OPPORTUNITY_AMOUNT_USD else 0 end ) as c1,
T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME as c2,
T28761.QUARTER_RANK as c3
from
XXFI.XXFI_GL_FISCAL_MONTHS_V T28761 /* Dim_Periods */ ,
XXFI.XXFI_OSM_OPPTY_HEADER_ACCUM T33142 /* Fact_Opportunity_Headers(CloseDate) */ ,
XXFI.XXFI_OSM_OPPTY_LINE_ACCUM T33231 /* Fact_Opportunity_Lines(CloseDate) */
where ( T28761.PERIOD_NAME = T33142.CLOSE_PERIOD_NAME and T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME = '2012-Q3' and T33142.LEAD_ID = T33231.LEAD_ID and T33231.LINES_BUSINESS_TYPE = 'New Business' and T33142.OPPORTUNITY_STATUS <> 'Duplicate' )
group by T28761.QUARTER_YEAR_NAME, T28761.QUARTER_RANK),
SAWITH1 AS (select distinct 0 as c1,
D1.c2 as c2,
'Bookings2' as c3,
D1.c3 as c4,
D1.c1 as c5
from
SAWITH0 D1),
SAWITH2 AS (select D1.c1 as c1,
D1.c2 as c2,
D1.c3 as c3,
D1.c4 as c4,
D1.c5 as c5,
sum(D1.c5) as c6
from
SAWITH1 D1
group by D1.c1, D1.c2, D1.c3, D1.c4, D1.c5)
select D1.c1 as c1, D1.c2 as c2, D1.c3 as c3, D1.c4 as c4, D1.c5 as c5, D1.c6 as c6 from ( select D1.c1 as c1,
D1.c2 as c2,
D1.c3 as c3,
D1.c4 as c4,
D1.c5 as c5,
sum(D1.c6) over () as c6
from
SAWITH2 D1
order by c1, c4, c3 ) D1 where rownum <= 2000001
Thank you,
Mike
Edited by: Mike Jelen on Jun 7, 2013 2:05 PM

Thank you for the info. They are definitely different values since ones on the header and the other is on the lines. As the "Won Opportunity" logical column is mapped to multiple LTS it appears the OBI 11 uses a different alogorthim to determine the most efficient table to use in the query generation vs 10g. I'll need to spend some time researching the impact to adding a 'sort' to the LTS. I'm hoping that there's a way to get OBI to use similar logic relative to 10g in how it generated the table priority.
Thx again,
Mike

SQL Query produces different results when inserting into a table

I have an SQL query which produces different results when run as a simple query to when it is run as an INSERT INTO table SELECT ...
The query is:
SELECT   mhldr.account_number
,        NVL(MAX(DECODE(ap.party_sysid, mhldr.party_sysid,ap.empcat_code,NULL)),'UNKNWN') main_borrower_status
,        COUNT(1) num_apps
FROM     app_parties ap
SELECT   accsta.account_number
,        actply.party_sysid
,        RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY actply.table_sysid, actply.loanac_latype_code ORDER BY start_date, SYSID) ranking
FROM     activity_players actply
,        account_status accsta
WHERE    1 = 1
AND      actply.table_id (+) = 'ACCGRP'
AND      actply.acttyp_code (+) = 'MHLDRM'
AND      NVL(actply.loanac_latype_code (+),TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))
AND      actply.table_sysid (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,1,8))
) mhldr
WHERE    1 = 1
AND      ap.lenapp_account_number (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(mhldr.account_number,1,8))
GROUP BY mhldr.account_number;      The INSERT INTO code:
TRUNCATE TABLE applicant_summary;
INSERT /*+ APPEND */
INTO     applicant_summary
( account_number
, main_borrower_status
, num_apps
SELECT   mhldr.account_number
,        NVL(MAX(DECODE(ap.party_sysid, mhldr.party_sysid,ap.empcat_code,NULL)),'UNKNWN') main_borrower_status
,        COUNT(1) num_apps
FROM     app_parties ap
SELECT   accsta.account_number
,        actply.party_sysid
,        RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY actply.table_sysid, actply.loanac_latype_code ORDER BY start_date, SYSID) ranking
FROM     activity_players actply
,        account_status accsta
WHERE    1 = 1
AND      actply.table_id (+) = 'ACCGRP'
AND      actply.acttyp_code (+) = 'MHLDRM'
AND      NVL(actply.loanac_latype_code (+),TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,9,2))
AND      actply.table_sysid (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(accsta.account_number,1,8))
) mhldr
WHERE    1 = 1
AND      ap.lenapp_account_number (+) = TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(mhldr.account_number,1,8))
GROUP BY mhldr.account_number;      When run as a query, this code consistently returns 2 for the num_apps field (for a certain group of accounts), but when run as an INSERT INTO command, the num_apps field is logged as 1. I have secured the tables used within the query to ensure that nothing is changing the data in the underlying tables.
If I run the query as a cursor for loop with an insert into the applicant_summary table within the loop, I get the same results in the table as I get when I run as a stand alone query.
I would appreciate any suggestions for what could be causing this odd behaviour.
Cheers,
Steve
Oracle database details:
Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.2.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production
Edited by: stevensutcliffe on Oct 10, 2008 5:26 AM
Edited by: stevensutcliffe on Oct 10, 2008 5:27 AM

stevensutcliffe wrote:
Yes, using COUNT(*) gives the same result as COUNT(1).
I have found another example of this kind of behaviour:
Running the following INSERT statements produce different values for the total_amount_invested and num_records fields. It appears that adding the additional aggregation (MAX(amount_invested)) is causing problems with the other aggregated values.
Again, I have ensured that the source data and destination tables are not being accessed / changed by any other processes or users. Is this potentially a bug in Oracle?Just as a side note, these are not INSERT statements but CTAS statements.
The only non-bug explanation for this behaviour would be a potential query rewrite happening only under particular circumstances (but not always) in the lower integrity modes "trusted" or "stale_tolerated". So if you're not aware of any corresponding materialized views, your QUERY_REWRITE_INTEGRITY parameter is set to the default of "enforced" and your explain plan doesn't show any "MAT_VIEW REWRITE ACCESS" lines, I would consider this as a bug.
Since you're running on 10.2.0.2 it's not unlikely that you hit one of the various "wrong result" bugs that exist(ed) in Oracle. I'm aware of a particular one I've hit in 10.2.0.2 when performing a parallel NESTED LOOP ANTI operation which returned wrong results, but only in parallel execution. Serial execution was showing the correct results.
If you're performing parallel ddl/dml/query operations, try to do the same in serial execution to check if it is related to the parallel feature.
You could also test if omitting the "APPEND" hint changes anything but still these are just workarounds for a buggy behaviour.
I suggest to consider installing the latest patch set 10.2.0.4 but this requires thorough testing because there were (more or less) subtle changes/bugs introduced with [10.2.0.3|http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2008/02/nasty-bug-introduced-with-patch-set.html] and [10.2.0.4|http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2008/04/overview-of-new-and-changed-features-in.html].
You could also open a SR with Oracle and clarify if there is already a one-off patch available for your 10.2.0.2 platform release. If not it's quite unlikely that you are going to get a backport for 10.2.0.2.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Formula Node Floor(x) Produces Different Result

Hi, A search didn't find anything about the Floor(x) function, so... I'm using LabVIEW 6.0.2, and the Floor(x)function in a Formula Node seems to be producing different results depending on previous calculations. I've got the following 2 lines in a Formula Node:
MSS = Ref / RefDiv;
MDN = floor(RF / MSS);
Ref is always 20.0M, RefDiv always 500.0, and for this calcualtion RF is always 1539.4, all numbers Double with 6 digits of precision. I generate an array of frequencies given a start, step, and frequency count. These frequencies then go to a subVI with a Formula Node that calculates the byte values to send to a couple PLLs.
If Start = 70.1, Step = .025, and Count = 20, at frequency 70.2 the Floor function gives 38.485.
If Start = 70.0, Step = .025, and Count = 20, at frequency 70.2 the Floor function gives 38.484.
I've omitted some calc steps here, but I've verified the starting values in the subVI are the same in both cases. Why the result changes I'm hoping someone can tell me...
Thanks,
Steve

I want to thank those involved again for their help. With ideas and hints from others I found a solution without scaling.
In recap, what had bothered me was it *appeared* like the same subVI was giving correct results one time and incorrect results only randomly. While I understand binary fractional imprecision, I wasn't doing any looped calculations 100+ times or anything.
I did some more checking though. The problem was indeed introduced by cumulative fractional addition. In this case 10 additions were enought to cause the error. Apparently, floor(71.199_94) produces 72.0. However, using a shift register and constant fraction to add an offset to produce an array introduces enough error in under 10 iterations to be a problem. By the time the loop got to what was supposed to be 72.0, it was actually 71.199_84 or something, enough to throw the floor function. Now I understand why the error occurred, and why it wasn't a problem before.
I fixed this problem by changing the real frequency number to a I32 before introduction to the formula node. This corrected the error introduced by the fractional addition by forcing 71.199_84 to 72, instead of letting it propagate through the rest of the calculations. And it was a whole lot easier than changing all the VIs to allow scaling! Also, I prefer to know where and why the problem happened, instead of just scaling all my calcualtions. Maybe I can recoginse potential problems in the future.
My boss wants to go back and look at his program to see if HPVee somehow bypassed the problem or if he did the calculations differently.
Thanks again for the insight and help,
Steve

Keyboard f keys suddenly producing different results

Why have my f keys suddenly - middle of workday - started producing different results? The f11 key has changed from increasing sound volume to showing Dashboard. Also, everything I do now produces a sound effect. All my email pages now have black borders. All I have done to the system is to download new ITUNES software. Any help greatly appreciated. I am on an iMac 8.1: 10.5.5.

Go to:
http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=235
Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE lundi 6 octobre 2008 13:36:29)

My ipad is jumping from different pages and it looks like someone is typing on the page.

Hi my ipad has started jumping from different pages and then the keyboard comes up and it looks like someone else is typing on the screen, can anyone help?

You can try these things first and see if they help at all.
Reset the iPad by holding down on the sleep and home buttons at the same time for about 10-15 seconds until the Apple Logo appears - ignore the red slider - let go of the buttons.
Quit all apps and restart the iPad.
Go to the home screen first by tapping the home button. Quit/close open apps by double tapping the home button and the task bar will appear with all of you recent/open apps displayed at the bottom. Tap and hold down on any app icon until it begins to wiggle. Tap the minus sign in the upper left corner to close the apps. Restart the iPad. Restart the iPad by holding down on the sleep button until the red slider appears and then slide to shut off. To power up hold the sleep button until the Apple logo appears and let go of the button.

Two CS4's produce different published .swf from the same fileset

Hello, I'm a novice at Flash, but an experienced troubleshooter, I've spent days on this intriguing problem:
*Can two CS4's produce different published .swf from the same fileset?
I have a flash suite written by a young man in China.
When I test the .swf file in the suite it works fine.
However I need to make some minor redesigns so I need to change the .fla file - but before I do I found that when I publish a new .swf from the .fla file (with all the necessary action scripts/xml etc in the right place) it doesn't produce the same outcome. Instead the navigation (next page, items per page etc) is missing.
When he does the same thing (I trust his integrity) he gets the new .swf with the navigation in tact.
You can see the two outcomes at the web address below (mock data).
There are no code changes, no library changes that I can find.
So I thought maybe there is something about different settings or 'environments' that can affect the outcome?
You can see at >> http://www.zaphmann.com/source/source.html << the correct navigation.
Then merely republishing the source.fla (and a rename of .swf) NOW The navigation is gone. >>>> http://www.zaphmann.com/source/sourcetoFromFLAswf.html <<<<<
Any ideas???
Thank you - a free book to anyone who has the answer.

Hello Ned, I
definitely have the very latest version, I will ask Mr. Chen to confirm his version. If his version were, say, 6 months old could that be of any significance?
The software suite appears to have authored produced a while ago as it uses actionscript 2, or maybe he just prefers that.
Basically the suite worked until he added a custom 'deeplink' (basically id tags in a few AS) and after which it still works at his end (compiled with CS3 or CS4), but not when I do likewise from the fla.
I have trawled through the AS code changes and see no errors or changes that would affect the navigation portion of the code which remains the same, so I hypothesized that there may some settings that could affect the publishing.
Young Mr. Chen in China seems to be a bright young man but not sto be so keen on deep troubleshooting...
Any ideas you have, however wild are welcomed, I can also send source files if that would help.

Create bid invit. from template in two different ways has different consequ

Hi everybody
"Create bid invit. from template in two different ways has different consequuences"
When I create a bid invitation from a previous template, from the template search results (Icon_create SAPLBBP_BID_INV 1010) my bid is published but then stay in the model search and the status is wating for approval. But no workflow started in BBP_PD.
If I use the same template for creating a new bid from the detail using the create bid invitation button, the bid invitation is created correctly.
I have configured the two events for the BUS2200 object and both of them have an initial condition.
It seems that the two actions trigger different events or something like that
Does anybody why it is occurring this and how I could link the workflow without approval for this case.
Thanks

Hi
What SRM version are you using ?
<b>Please see these SAP OSS notes / links, which might help -></b>
<u>Note 976752 - Bidding Worklfows are not triggered correctly
Note 941417 - Creating a bid invitation from template in the background
Note 971752 - Incorrect approval preview in bid approval
Note 741372 - Separating template search from bid invitation search
Note 764028 - New bid invitation items not visible in bid
Note 996907 No approval preview for bid after note 976752
Note 765771 Workflow error when creating a purchase order from bid
Note 790930 No warning message in case of jump from bid</u>
Regards
- Atul

Premiere Pro CC and Encoder CC ( 7.1.0 ) produce different outputs dependant on Queue or Export meth

I have used a standard workflow for many months but recently something has changed. If I create a simple 720x576 sequence with video and then send this to Media encoder I get different results dependant on if I queue or export the sequence. If I export directly from the application then the resulting file is perfect ( MPEG2/QT ) , however if I queue the file and then export the resulting file contains small black vertical bands at either side of the image an the resulting image looks squashed.
Testing the same workflow in CS6 does not have the issue.
Has something changed with the latest 7.1.0 release ???
Can anyone make a simple test and let me know ??
If you simply queue to the Media encoder and view the window you can see the added bands ??
I am using MAC OSX 10.7.5 as a platform
Thanks

Here you can download the trial they are all the first build (7.0)
http://prodesigntools.com/adobe-cc-direct-download-links.html
Updates can be found here:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=98&platform =Windows
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=98&platform =Macintosh
Take from http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1357792?tstart=0
Also, take care to track down Adobe Media Encoder 7.0 — the installers above don't downgrade AME, and you'll have issues queing projects if you're sending it from Premiere 7.0 to AME 7.2.

Different ways to return results using a stored proc to calling application

Hi, Can someone please suggest me different ways of returning results( set of rows and columns) from a stored procedure to calling application.
Currently I am using sys_refcursor to return results to front end. Stored proc is executed fast, but cursor access and retrieval of results has some overhead.
So can you suggest the ways which will be faster than this approach.
Thanks.

Currently the procedure executes quickly but the results from the ref cursor are returned slowly, this is because the query is slow, for whatever reason.
Collecting in all the rows in the stored procedure first before returning them will
a) Make the stored procedure slower taking the same amount of time to execute as current query takes to complete.
b) Use more memory.
c) Put more stress on the network as all rows will be transferred at once instead of using the arraysize/fetchsize to to fetch the rows in smaller packets.

RRI Jumps from Different Characteristics Produce Different Results

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for