Script to Edit Gaussian Blur Effect

Hello
I have a complex piece of artwork which has to be scaled up by a factor of 10. No problem except the Gaussian Blur Effect will not scale.
Rather than go through each path and edit the blur amount (by a factor of 10) I had hoped I could write a script which would iterate through every path and if it had a Gaussian Blur Effect edit the value.
Looking in the AppleScript dictionary and online I can't see any way of accessing a path's Appearance or Effects.
I would be very grateful for some advice on this before I start the tedious process of manually changing the values.
Regards
Chris

Hello Mark
Thanks for your prompt reply. I thought as much. It's disappointing really.
The select filters will not unfortunately be helpful because the blurs are different so I can't select all blurred items because I don't want to set them all the same and equally I can't pick one and select all with the same blur amount because I don't know if I have changed all of the items.
I've just got my head down and am selecting them all individually and editing them!
Regards
Chris

Similar Messages

Gaussian Blur effect causing black frames when rendered.

I am only using one effect in my video, its the gaussian blur, and in the previewer it shows the effect being applied, however it shows random black frames in the previewer, I thought this was just a random previewer issue.
I then rendered the video but when the blur effect is being applied it is showing random black frames in the video.

Talked to customer support and found out that it was a duplicate Gaussian Blur effect on the same frame causing it to have some issues sigh*
But thank you for the info about the media cache, I did not know about that.

Missing tools in Fast-Blur effect, Gaussian Blur effect, ...

Hey there,
I'm using Premiere Pro CC and I was just about to mask an object in my video with the Fast-Blur effect (Schneller Weichzeichner in german and as it can be seen in the attached image).
But when I apply this effect to my video it won't show me any tool I could apply it with. It's the same with any blur effect, such as the Gaussian Blur.
These tools should be right above the adjuster from 0 to 127. Any idea?
Thank you
Peter

If you want to use the mask tool you need to update to CC2014 (8.2). It looks like you are atill on CC7.

How to avoid darker color behind a gaussian blur effect?

I have used the effect gaussian blur with black text on top to make a logo.
My problem occures when I try to place the file on a coloured background e.g. a photo and print it. A darker colored area appears behind the gaussian blur. The logo is to be used by others and hence I would like to keep it a vector/illustrator file (not a pixelated photoshop file).
- I have saved it as an ai
- I have all the artwork in one layer
- I have tried object > flatten transparency (but then the area turns white)
- I have tried effect > Document raster effects settings (resolution 1200 dpi / add 35,28 mm around object)

- I use Illustrator CC v. 17.1.0. 64-bit
- the file is cmyk and I only use process colors
- the line is 8 pt and effect is applied with 8 px blur
- everything else in the document is outlines and some text and lines are crossing the blurred object
- color settings: European coated offset ECI
I hope I haven't missed anything. The logo is not launched, but I have enclosed I photo file that is similar and where the same problem occur. The file is placed in InDesign on a blue square and printed from InDesign to a OKIC8660 laser printer.
The light blue to the left is the correct color. The darker blue is not supposed to happen. The yellow is where the gaussian blur is applied.

Gaussian Blur photoshop effect parameters

Hello,
Im working on svg format exporter, and what I need to do is to export some of AI effects as SVG filters.
I encountered a problem with Effect -> (PhotoshopEffects) Blur -> Gaussian Blur effect.
When getting the effect parameters there is some binary entry in the dictionary and it is not documented naywhere in the docs what type of data it that.
When serializing a document with GaussianBlur effect info fxg foramt, here is what you can find in the xml :
<ai:LiveEffect index="0" major="1" minor="0" name="PSAdapter_plugin_GblR">
    <ai:Dict data="B go 1 I PrevDres 300 I dataSize 24 ">
        <ai:Entry name="data" value="AAAAAVJkcyAAAAAAZG91Yj/xmZmgAAAA" valueType="N"/>
    </ai:Dict>
</ai:LiveEffect>
Attribute value holds the binary data describing the GaussianBlur effect with radius set to 1,1 value.
Can anybody tell how to decode the binary data so that I could dig out the radius value from it?
Thanks in advance,
Rafał

Ok, I found the problem so will leave the solution, maybe somebody will also need this.
So the value attribute value="AAAAAVJkcyAAAAAAZG91Yj/xmZmgAAAA" is base64 encoded.
When decoded it presents sth like this, where dots "." are zeros (actually below presented data represents gaussian blur effect data for radius == 2, not 1,1 like in previous post):
....Rds ....doub@.......
this is same data in hex
00 00 00 01 52 64 73 20 00 00 00 00 64 6f 75 62 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
and last 8 bytes represents a double number in big endian:
@....... == 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Im working on windows, so after switching it to little endian we get
.......@ or 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40
which is our radius in double format.
To be more precise the initial number in the binary data is typeIEEE64BitFloatingPoint, and can be googled in some Python/Apple's header files, here for instance http://svn.python.org/projects/python/trunk/Lib/plat-mac/Carbon/AppleEvents.py.
Cheers

Multiple (Legacy) Blur Effects plus various opacities cause file to crash upon Save. What to do?

We have to work with designers' files and we have some that have many layered objects that use Gaussian Blur effects created in CS5 (we're in CS6), plus various opacities, opacity masks, etc. Pretty much the kitchen sink. The files can't be saved except by using the most powerful Mac in the office. I have a Quad-Core processor running Snow Leopard, with 6 GB of RAM, and it's not enough. Any tricks? Perhaps saving without Use Compression or something?

Lots to be excited about. BUT...Just updated to 8.1 on one of my computers to test it out...
Sadly, the following issue is NOT fixed for me. Is it with new projects only? I haven't started a new project on 8.1 I've only opened an old project but the issue that I'm referring to which involves also a delay/freeze of anywhere from a few seconds to a MINUTE while the render bar goes from yellow to red and then back to yellow is still there. Boo.
On the list above...
Switching between sequences can turn the render bar red.
This issue is incredibly easy to replicate. I really do hope it gets fixed. Here are the steps:
1) Create two sequences with multiple short clips (the more clips the better)
2) Make sure GPU acceleration is enabled.
3) Add warp stabilizer to the clips in both sequences. Again, the more clips the longer the delay/freeze will be as the render bar goes from YELLOW to RED and then eventually back to YELLOW again.
4) Hit SAVE.
5) Now, toggle between sequences. You'll hit a short delay with a few clips stabilized and a LONG delay with lots stabilized. In my case this delay is around a full minute. The render bar will go from YELLOW to RED and then back to yellow...eventually.
6) Toggle back to the original sequence and the delay occurs again.
7) Once you've toggled between sequences and have gone through this delay, that's it, there is no longer a delay...UNTIL...(and here's the big kicker)...until the project is SAVED again. After that the issue returns when you toggle between sequences. Both saving manually and AUTOSAVING cause this issue. No way around it except not editing with GPU acceleration.
Not sure what the issue is...caching issue when saving maybe? Either way, it stinks and it's still there in 8.1. Big bummer.
Again, lots to be excited about with this release but I really was hopefully this specific issue was resolved.
Sigh.

Gaussian Blur is different when Scaling

Hi Guys,
I have a problem when I scaled one object which has Gaussian Blur effect. Before it is scaled it looks smooth and nice (1st image), however when it is scaled to larger size, the Gaussian Blur does not look the same (2nd image). Please refer to my screen shots for better understanding. Any help and tip is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

David,
Just managing to collect my wits (easier here an hour after midnight).
The Gaussian Blur is fundamentally a Photoshop effect and therefore fails to answer to the Scale Strokes & Effects.
You will need to increase the value as suggested, or you may turn the object into a Symbol before scaling, and then it should behave as you wish.

Cs4 urgent - gaussian blur have different visualization on same object

Continuing the before post. As i have write before i have copied and pasted an object from one document to another but the gaussian blur effect are visualized in different way, as the image. Why this?

Thank you, i have find where to set this parameter.
I have another question. I'm designing a graphic library for display on touchscreen, is better if i use resolution 72ppi or 300ppi for the raster effects resolution?

Gaussian blur-- posterization

Hi all-
In a current project, I'm using some blurring effects through time (either a shot starts off blurry and comes into focus, or the reverse direction). All of the raw footage starts out completely in focus.
I have been using the "Gaussian Blur" effect in FCP, but I'm finding that as the blur amount changes through time, the image gets very posterized (i.e. distinct color bands, rather than gradual color shift), especially if there is motion in the shot that I'm blurring.
Does anyone recommend a way to eliminate the posterization artifacts, or a different effect or plug-in that will accomplish my image blurs with a more natural-lens look and quality?
Thanx gang.
-Chris

Yup, that's it, Jerry.
But in another FCP group, a listserve, I belong to, in a recent thread about 10-bit video in Final Cut, some well respected professionals did some testing. Oliver Peters posted this reply:
OK, I've had a chance to get back to this and ran another test this morning. SD input from DBeta to Kona2 using bars from DBeta tape. Captured bars both as 8-bit and 10-bit
media. Created 5 timelines:
1. 8-bit with 8-bit processing
2. 8-bit with HPYUV processing
3. 10-bit with 10-bit processing
4. 10-bit with HPYUV processing
5. 10-bit with 8-bit processing
Applied 3-way CC to the clips and compared no effect, effect rendered and effect previewed (not rendered). When you leave the CC settings at default, i.e. no adjustments, all timelines and all combinations of rendered, unrendered and no effect match each other on the scopes. (Note, that there was a very slight change on the 8-bit processing in the
10-bit timeline.) However, when you actually change the settings, i.e. apply CC changes, then ALL 10-bit and HPYUV combinations show a shift between rendered and preview of
the effect. The ONLY timeline where there was no change was #1, 8-bit with 8-bit processing. Also the 8-bit within the 10-bit timeline had extremely little change, but of course you take a hit stepping down to 8-bit processing. The changes that I saw were minor luma shifts (mainly in the midrange) and subtle vector shifts.
Quad-core G5 5GB RAM, Aja Io-LA, FCS 5.1 Mac OS X (10.4.6) Lots of toys

Scale Path With Blur Effect

Hello
This should be simple, I must be missing something obvious.
For simplicity let's say I have a circle with a 20px Gaussian Blur effect. If I scale it to be 10% of its original size, with 'Scale Stroke and Effects' ticked, it still has a 20px blur. How do I scale the circle without expanding its appearance please. I would like to retain the effect but it end up a 2px blur.
Thank you.
Chris

Hello Kurt
I had never noticed that the Transform effect scales the effects correctly as well.
Thanks.

Gaussian blur causes clip to displace

All of a sudden aplying a Gaussian blur effect displaces certain clips - it just moves the clip to top left by about 1/4... Looks like it affects certain clips, that are not the same size as the projcet, but I'm not sure.
The thing is that it worked before well, so I don't know what happened...
I'm on Mac OS 10.5.8, Premiere CS4

Hi Ann
wow - the Update solved it! haha - I wasnt' using Premiere for a while, and probably reinstalled it in one of those system renewal days and forgot to update
Thanks

Doc Raster Effects on gaussian blur

CS5, Mac 10.8.4.
We inherited a design at doc raster effects of 72 dpi, using a light blue PMS 291 arch shape that was gaussian blurred to make a soft arched gradient.
Changed doc raster effects to 300 dpi, and the gradient turned into a solid of PMS 291. I edited the 90 gaussian blur amount to 21.6 = (90 * 72)/300. That did not look right as the gradient was not soft but hard. Kept tweaking the gradient to find that it looked best at 59, when we went to 60 pixels then the gradient jumped to a solid lt blue with no gradient. Printed the 59 gaussian blue, and it looked like this coming out of our DC 240 color xerox laser printer (photoshopped to simulate, basically the gradient ends with a hard wave.)
So I said enough of this, I do not like the gaussian blur and wish Illustrator did not even have that as and option cause for final work causes to much trouble. Rebuilt this as a 3 step blend in PMS 291. Looked great on screen, but also printed like the second screen shot. Anyone have any idea what I can do. I am totally fine with getting rid of the gaussian blur, as we will be having many more new packaging coming in different sizes that will need this arched gradient.
Here are my doc raster effect settings. Would like to know more about anti alias and the create clipping mask option. My question though is how to get rid of gradient ending hard.

Seems the best I can do is to rebuild this gradient in Photoshop as a spot channel, so that I get a soft ending.
If anyone from Adobe or the forums has any input about this do raster effects setting, and how to calculate a gaussian blur that looks the same at 72 or 300 dpi.

AI effects: Feather versus gaussian blur? which is raster or vector?

i`m looking at feathering versus blurring. both in illustrator effect drop down menu.
from what I I understand the blur/gaussian blur under photoshop effects (in illustrator) will pixelate the edge gradation, but the illustrator effect "feather, will keep it vector, is this correct?
from sample here they both look the same to me, and I noticed the feather effect was gaussian blurring the edge anyway to produce its result,,
from what I can see I should be able to make either of these as large as a billboard and they would both still be smooth gradients? or would the gaussian blur result in pixelation unless I had the vector object sized correctly in the document in the first place to suit the billboard.
what I am trying to ask is how do they work,
my take is the AI "feather" will allow resizing of the vector object shape to any size and not be pixelated on print output,
where as the gaussian blur PS effect, you would need to make sure your object is correctly sized on the correct document size to ensure that it prints smoothly.
any feedback is good,....

wildbirdsketch,
actually can I confirm, both produce a raster gradation to soften the edge, so its no longer vector once you apply a blur or feather correct?
It is, but with raster effects.
asking because if I create a blur/feather, I will have to consider the resolution or not as again I`m assuming no because each time I resize the object the effect recalculates itself as necessary to create the right blur and resolution for that size.?
As long as you keep the Effect>Document Raster Effect Settings the same, the resolution of raster effects will remain the same,
and when these vector objects print (in general for AI), i`ve never known, do they print as Vector or does the RIP turn them all into raster anyway?
Indeed.
just confused on this, I`m guessing their only vector while in illustrator, but once going through the printer it will all be raster via the RIP if thats correct,
Indeed.
its just that vector allows you to scale it to the required output size prior to print and have it print crisply without having to focus on resolution or resampling methods correct?
Indeed.

I'm trying to isolate skin with a secondary layer and am successful. I want to blur the skin to reduce blemishes but when doing so the blur and degrain sliders don't seem to have an effect. Can I apply a gaussian blur fx on just that secondary? Can't see

I'm trying to isolate skin with a secondary layer and am successful. I want to blur the skin to reduce blemishes but when doing so the blur and degrain sliders don't seem to have an effect. Can I apply a gaussian blur fx on just that secondary? Can't seem to figure this out. Is there a better way to smooth skin?

Here's an Adobe help page for isolating skin with suggestion on the use of the blur slider also:
https://helpx.adobe.com/speedgrade/using/apply-secondary-color-corrections.html
And here's one of the original creators of Iridas/SpeedGrade, Patrick Palmer, a six minute vid-tut on using secondaries (specifically in CS6 but this hasn't changed):
http://tv.adobe.com/watch/learn-speedgrade-cs6/secondary-color-correction-in-speedgrade-cs 6/
I'd note, the "blur" and "denoise" tools on the Secondary tab are more about smoothing the keying of the secondary ... they apply a bit of blur or de-noising to make the secondary smoother and cover over the odd pixel or three or four that don't "fit" the key of the secondary in the middle of something you're aiming for.
In current SpeedGrade, I'd try using the Guassian Blur (Range) effect, and sample a good range of the skin tones.
And a lot of people use Red Giant's "Cosmo" plug-in over in AfterEffects or Premiere Pro ... it's a tool designed specifically for working skin tones, dealing with blemishes, wrinkles, spots, and such.
Neil

Transform Effect and Gaussian Blur creates issues

Here is one issue I cannot figure out how to correct. At times, I apply the Distort - Transform effect on a clip to scale up/down, etc,...then the next clip (which I dissolve to) has the Gaussain Blur applied to it. When I apply the blur the previous clip (with the Transform effrect) shifts. I have the Blur effect above the Transform effect in the Effects pannel and it still does not help. I cannot figure out how to stop the clip from shifting.

I recall a similar bug with Gaussian Blur a while back. I winder if that bug is still around.

Script to Edit Gaussian Blur Effect

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for