SD and Delivery objects Status checking

HI Experts,
In FI we have a transaction called FB99 to check whether the FI document is eligible for Archiving or not.
Similarly , Do we have any transactions to check whether the given Sales , Invoice and Delivery documents are eligible for Archiving.
Can Any one suggest Transaction codes please.
Thanks,
Swarna

Hi Every one,
We have delete option also provided by SARA , so no need to make use of SE16n &sap_edit& option to delete the record.
I dont find the transaction codes in the Customizing transactions option provided by AOBJ transaction.
We have Pre-Processing Programs also for all these Sales orders/Deliveries and Invoices.
So by using that program we can be able to determine the eligibility condition.
Thanks for all the replies.
Regards - Swarna.

Similar Messages

Availability check on storages in sales order and delivery documents

Hi all,
I'm verifying if it's possible to find a standard or a custom solution for this type of problem:
I have a scenario in which there are more storages relevant for MRP (ex. 01, 02, 03, 04), and, in if I check availability in sales order or delivery (using checking rules "A" or "B") with setting which considering storages location inspection in availability check control, system check if there's stock available on all these storages.
I'm trying to verify if it's possible to consider only some on these storages (ex. 01 and 03 only) in sales order and delivery documents availablity check.
I know that in sales order storage location field is normally filled only using exit, but i don't know if it's possible to do, using a user exit, check availability considering only some storages and not all. At delivery level i have tried to use stock strategy, but this functionality don't have consequences on availability check, also if it's relevant during good issue phase.
Any suggestion will be appreciated.
Regards
Gianpaolo

Hi Gianpaolo,
We had some issues with availability check on a Customer Site.
I don't remember right now if we had to exclude storage locations from MRP to take them out from ATP, but I guess Shiva is 100% correct.
At the end, what was done was to always "force" a unique storage location in the sales order item, which will be the storage location used for shipping of the delivery of course.
If you use WM in your plant, then you will have no problem in having a unique storage location, so no problem.
Anyway you are correct in your analysis, if the Storage location is not informed in the sales order item, then all the plant stock is taken in account for ATP.
Best Regards,
Franck
Freelance Logistics SAP Consultant

Packing status and delivery status

What are the fields for packing status and delivery status?

Hi,
Please check tables VBUK (header status) and VBUP (item status).
VBUK-LFSTK ((Delivery status)
VBUK-PKSTK (Overall packing status of all items)
VBUP-LFSTA (Delivery status)
VBUP-PKSTA (Packing status of item)
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

Shipping and delivery status from R/3 to CRM

Hi all,
we are creating sales orders in CRM and replicating it to R/3. CRM is the owner of the document.
Now whenever changes are done to sales order in CRM, the changes are replicated to R/3.
Let's say the shipping status is updated in R/3. Now the requirement is the changes need to be replicated
back to CRM.
I can use the scenario X + Y or X alone. But with X or X + y scenario Once I make changes in R/3 then the
document owner changes to R/3. this means any further changes in CRM will not be replicated back to R/3.
I require all changes from CRM to be replicated to R/3, but from R/3 I require the shipping and delivery status to be replicated back to CRM. How could this be achieved.
It would be great if you could share the experiences.
Thanks
Jothi.

Hi all,
I have a similar requirement. Can you please tell me how to go with it?
The requirement is to send the user status from CRM (where the request is generated) to R3 (where the material is processed).
The user status of the return order in CRM should be sent real-time to R3. Any updates to the user status in CRM should result in a corresponding change in the user status in R3. Any updates to the user status in R3 should trigger a corresponding change to the user status in CRM. All user statuses must be available in BI/BW for reporting and analytical requirements.
From R3 to CRM Standard R3-CRM middleware exchanges information between the two systems any time a transaction is created or changed. At this point the order information is exchanged between the two systems depending on whether the item or the header level data is changed in R3. The development should be able to download the user status at the header & the line item level when the middleware brings down R3 sales transaction data to CRM. For the sake of simplicity the status profile in R3 and CRM will be defined exactly the same therefore we do not need a mapping table between the two systems. This information should also be exchanged in case the line item is deleted / cancelled / rejected.
The same from CRM to R/3.
Processing restrictions :
This should not be transaction, item category or status profile specific so that as and when a new transaction type, item category or a status profile is added it should still be allowed to transfer between the two systems.
Should be developed as an enhancement to the standard middleware data stream between R3 and CRM.
Regards,
Raju

How and when does oracle changes the object status on a view?

I have HR schema and AWARD schema. AWARD schema has views referencing the base tables in HR. Whenever I refresh HR the dependant views on AWARD becomes invalid. I recompile those views after the refresh.
Could anyone explain the internals of this object status change process? How does my AWARD schema sense the invalid status? Why it is not re-establishing the status after the data import?

I refresh HR test instance from production. If you are not so sure about this process...here is what happens ....export production HR schema, drop all the objects from HR test and import the production data into HR test.
I am not worried about what is happening but would like to understand the internal process (beyond the basics).

ATP check at order level and delivery level

Hello SAP Gurus,
We are implementing ATP ( Available to promise ) check for the product lines of our client.
Client is asking for comparative benefits if we implement the check at order level or at delivery level . Which would be most beneficial .....activating check at Sales order level OR at delivery level?
Kindly help me by sharing your thoughts or any through any standard help available on SAP site.
Thanks and Regards,
Abhijeet

Its always better to have the best of both the worlds.
Have ATP both at order and delivery level. Its important at order level since you would like to give the customer a confirmed date and quantity when he places the order. It ensures that you do not over commit or under commit the customer.
ATP at delivery level is, i think, should be a must which would prevent creating ambiguous deliveries with huge quantities even if the stocks are not there and then getting stuck during goods issue. Also, it might happen that delivery is created lot later than when the SO gets created and in the meantime stock position might have got changed. A lot of rescheduling and manual backorder processing keeps happening and you can never be sure if a stock that was booked by a sales order would still be there with it.
Other ppl might have different views

Work orders and updating user status (via IW32)

Hello All,
I was given a design to create a program that will retrieve all open work orders. The program needs to check on all the purchase orders for that work order to check if order quantity matches the received quantity and the invoice quantity. If it matches, I will do an IW32 to change the user status to 'AIP' (All Invoices Paid). If there are no invoices or purchase orders, I will again, do an IW32 to change the user status to 'AIP'.
And since this is my first time to work on a PM ticket, I'm not very familiar with the tables being used. I've tried looking for a list of PM tables. One table I got is AUFK (Order Master Data). I searched through the table and it has the fields for Sales Order Number (KDAUF) and Item Number (KDPOS). Is this the Purchase Order related to the work order? Also, is there a way I can see or verify it through a transaction? I tried looking into transaction IW33 but I couldn't find any Purchase Order Number there. Also, how do you know if a work order is open or not? Is there a field that indicates it?
I was thinking if there are any BAPI's I can use to change a work order's user status instead of doing a CALL TRANSACTION 'IW32'? I saw a function module, RFC_CHANGE_PM_ORDER, that does a remote function call to IW32 but this has dialogs. I'd appreciate any input.
Many thanks in advance!
Regards,
Kristine

Hi
You can use the BAPI - BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN to maintain orders.
Given below few order related tables
AUFK     -Production order headers
AFIH     -Maintenance order header
AUFM     -Goods movement for prod. order
AFKO     -Order header data PP orders
AFPO     -Order item
RESB     -Order componenten
AFVC     -Order operations
AFVV     -Quantities/dates/values in the operation
AFVU     -User fields of the operation
AFFL     -Work order sequence
AFFH     -PRT assignment data for the work order(routing)
JSTO     -Status profile
JEST     -Object status
AFRU     -Order completion confirmations
This may help you.
Thanks & Regards,
Govind.

STO and delivery is getting created in the foreground instead of background

Hi experts,
In return document (with reference to Work Order), When user is selecting recommended action u2018YAu2019 and clicking the u2018returnu2019 button, an STO and delivery is getting created in the foreground instead of generating them in background.
T-code - o3o_RT02
Test case
Create Work Order (IW31)
Create return document w.r.t Work Order (o3o_RT01)
Select recommended action u2018YAu2019, save and select u2018returnu2019 button.

Hi,
Could you checkthe foll cust link in SPRO:
Define Objects in Backend System (Purch. Reqs, Reservations, Purch. Orders).
PO is created if you set the "*" for EITHER the purchasing group OR the product category.
SRM is creating PR or PO depending on:
- SRM customizing (ex: always external proc + PR if incomplete, PO if complete)
- the interpretation of SC data by R/3.
IF your SC is considered complete by SRM (but with a fixed vendor and not a preferred vendor) the system will check if it can create a PO in R/3.
For this, each item will request a META_INTERPRETE_DATA to R/3, asking if it can create a PO. If R/3 considers this data as incomplete, it will reply to create a PR.
Usual cases of R/3 PR creation instead of PO:
- prefered vendor in SRM (and not a fixed one)
- custom checks in user exits in R/3
- error messages in R/3 (ex: O6 334 In the case of a fixed vendor, please enter info record)
To debug without debuging into R/3, you can also try the following:
- use BADI DETERMINE_TARGET_OBJECT and force PO creation
- so the system will always try to create a PO
- R/3 won't create the PO (for the same reason as in META_INTERPRETE_DATA), and will raise an error in SRM
- finally you get the real error in application monitor (SC --> backend application errors
Related thread:
Re: PO not create from SC with source of supply in classic sena
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

Transport Request Number - Object Status is LOCKED. What does it mean?

Hi Friends,
When checking in SE09 transaction my TR number "Object Status" is showing as LOCKED.
What does it mean
Whether I can transport objects under this TR Number to Quality System?
Will it give any problem while transporting?
Regards,
Viji.

The main reason to lock the request is to avoid any duplications.
You can also unlock the request if you want using SE03 transaction.
Goto SE03 transaction,select unlock objects and execute.give your
request number and execute.it will be unlocked.

Customizing and workbench objects

what are customizing objects and workbench objects?

Changes to cross-client Customizing objects and to Repository objects are recorded in Workbench requests
In workbench request .... it can be programs(repository objects) and cross client data (ie not specific to one client).
Changes to client-specific Customizing objects are recorded in Customizing requests.
Customer customized data designed for a specific client is transported to another client using customizing request. Most of the cases these requests are something like changing values in tables (that too client specific).
Once the Transport request is created it will be "Modified" Status.
Before a request can be transported it should be "Released".
Once the request is released no other changes pertaining to the object saved in the request can be saved to the same request. you have to create a new request for that.
After transporting to the required system, you can check the log of the transport to see if this was transported without errors.

Delivery Block Status text / Billing Block Staus text

In the Sales Order Overview Screen
Sales View
Even though we had removed the delivery Block from the Schedule lines and saved the order,
We still have the
Delivery Block Status as BLOCKED
Billing Block Status as BLOCKED
How can we remove this?

Hi,
Check sales document type in configuration VOV8 whether delivery and billing is blocked. if it is blocked make it as blank. and check in sales order.
Regards,
Sasikanth.Ch

Delivery block status is Blocked

Hi all,
In a standard order(VA02), initially for item 10, we enter a material and then save it.
Then the same item 10 is changed into a different material.
However, the delivery block status in Item 10 for the first material is still 'Blocked', whereas for the newly entered material the delivery block status says 'Not Blocked'.
Please let me know the reason for this.
Thanks and regards,
Anishur

This is not standard (if i recall). This might have developed in one of your sales user exits. Check out all of your user exits in program SAPMV45A..... Specially in source determination and save document prepare user exits (may be in include MV45AFZB and MV45AFZZ)

Partial delivery SO status became completed

Dear All,
I faced the following problem:
1. SO was created for 10 pcs
2. Via SO reference a delivery doc was created for 5 pcs
3. WM-TO was created and PGI was executed
4. The status of SO item became completed
What is the reason? I checked VTLA > document flow update is set. No partial delivey indicators are maintained in SO and customer master (the field is blank).
I'd like to ask you to please help if you can.
Thanks,
Csaba

Dear All,
I'd like to ask to please help in this issue.
I tested the same without WM and in case of partial delivery I faced the same problem: the status of the sales order becomes completed.
1. SO created for 2 pcs (VA01)
2. Delivery document created for 1 pc (VL01N)
3. Picking (w/o WM!) was done (VL01N) > 'Pick status' & 'Overall pick status' become 'C'; 'Pick confirmation' Picking/putaway confirmation' become 'C' (delivery document, 'Status overview' tab)
The result is that SO becomes 'Completed'.
If I delete the picked qty from 'Pick qty' field (VL02N, delivery doc 'Picking' tab) and I save the result:
1. 'Pick status' & 'Overall pick status' become 'A'; 'Pick confirmation' Picking/putaway confirmation' remain 'C' (delivery document, 'Status overview' tab)
2. After saving the above mentioned change SO document remains completed.
(Please consider no GI took place!!!)
If I delete the item from Delivery doc, SO becomes open (not delivered - don't know exactly what is the proper expression since I1m not in english environment) again - so it seems something is wrong with picking...
Thanks,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 23, 2008 9:59 AM

Status check on MIGO while doing GR from PO

Hi Team,
How to remove/ deactivate status check maintained on MIGO while doing GR from PO
Thanks

Not sure exactly what is causing it but I doubt that this is an SAP problem.
The error message you are getting has only the word TEST in it and the message number starts with a Z. SAP doesn't start their message numbers with Z. It is used for customer objects. This tells me that the message you are seeing is a custom one someone in your company has created and is causing to display. Chances are it is being used in a user exit as part of development. If this is in your production system, I would say you have a problem as a TEST message like that shouldn't show up. It should either be a real message with additional information or it should have been removed before moving to production.
I would have a developer run this in debug. Chances are you'll find a user exit in use that is causing this.
FF

Payment terms and delivery terms

Dear SAP Gurus,
How to create new payment terms and delivery terms in Materials Management module and what are the settings required/integration with FICO mudule.Please guide me.
Thanks and regards
Mahesh

Dear,
Payment terms: (In MM side attached with Vendor Master)
The payment terms represent the typical agreements you have with your customers and vendors. Therefore, you do not have to define this information from scratch for each customer and vendor.
When a purchasing or sales document is entered for a vendor or customer, SAP Business One automatically copies the information on the payment period, price list, and total discount in the document. This information is used, to calculate the prices for the items, the due date of an invoice, or the total discount allowed etc.
You can also change the payment term data manually in the transaction itself if a special agreement was made for that transaction. In addition, the information on the credit limit is copied from the payment term to the customer master record and then to the sales document, and can be used for a credit check.
For the complete process of payment terms visit: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sbo2004a/helpdata/en/c7/583e38404780498ef3d08b1fa076cb/content.htm
Delivery terms : In the MM prospective delivery terms generally indicates the status of material delivery. For ex. Goods Must be packed well for protection / Proper handling instructions must be labelled on each pack / Net weight & Gross weight should be mentioned on pack / International Maritime Dangerous goods code should be printed on pack in case of Dangerous goods transported by sea / Like wise similar instructions for Air transport for Dangerous goods / All technical names should be printed and attached on cover of pack / the packs must be perfectly packed with water protection and palletised like wise the terms of delivery we set to the suppliers of materials.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

SD and Delivery objects Status checking

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for