Selection report for action processing in background

Hi,
in GTS-Export you have the possibility to start an activity with a selection report. Exist already an example report in the system or have somebody an example available?
Thanks.
Kind regards
Frank

Hai friend,
Are you talking about AES , if so, this is more of a config activity check the follwoing
SAP Global Trade Services u2192SAP Customs Management u2192 General Settings u2192 Communication Processes u2192 Define Conditions and output Parameters for Comm. of Cust. Ship. & Cust. Dcl
SAP Global Trade Services u2192 SAP Customs Management u2192 General Settings u2192 Communication Processes u2192 Define Control Settings for Communication Processes
also go thru
Preferred Practice USu2013Automated Export Systems (US-AES) in sap
thanks
Ramesh

Similar Messages

  • Report for open process orders

    Dear SAP experts,
    As the period of the process order from open to close is not short, will take 1 or 2 months in our business case, so we want to find a report which can get the information just like the output of KSPP(for planned orders) .
    I tried to analysis the logic of program KSPP, and it seems the function modules based on the planned orders only.
    Is there any way to get the similar report for open process orders?
    Many Thanks,
    Lisa Yao

    Is there any clues?

  • Ad Hoc Report for Actions Run...

    Dear All,
    I want to have the information of all the employees from the actions run.
    The first action run date and the employee group at that time and the last action run and the employee group at that time.
    Is there any standard report for this? or is it possible through SQ01?
    Pls let me know...
    Kind Regards
    Nag

    Hi,
    Check with this report if any helps to you.
    T. code: S_PH9_46000223 (Further selctions you need to select Action type)
    Edited by: ERP12345 on Dec 12, 2011 10:54 AM

  • Reports for Complaint Processing IS-Retail

    Hi gurus
    Is there any report or T code which shows history of complaints in SAP IS-Retail
    Your help in this regard will be greatly appreciated
    Regards
    Sri

    Hi Sakthi,
    Actually, i done as per the Empties processing Building Block, as per the BPPs:
    Process Flow is:
    Step 1: Assigin empties articles to Full products as component in Basic Data View in Article Master Record (T.code:MM42)
    Step 2: Create Purchase order for full product to External Vendor, automatically the componenets has be to exploded with Return item active. (only components will be marked as Return Active)
    Step 3: Goods Receipt from Vendor to DC.
    Step 4: Stock Transport Order from DC to Store. ( Here also, components will be activated as Return Item)
    Step 5: Goods Receipt in Store
    Step 6: Return the empties articles (component) to DC. (T.Code: MB01 )
    In my case, since the Return Item is not activated for components in Purchaser order or STO, i not able to return the empties in T.Code:MB01
    If, required please give ur mail id, i will send the BPP document for Empties Processing to you id.
    Thanks
    Bala

  • Reports for IDOC processing

    hi there,
    can u please let me know the use of reports
    RBDMANIN, RBDMANI2, RBDAPP01, RBDMON00

    hi,
    the programs RBDMANIN, RBDMANI2 are used to process the error idocs. RBDAPP01 is to process the Idocs which are ready for transfer. and the last RBDMON00 is to choose the Idocs to process . some of the programs are documented just check it.
    Regards
    vijay

  • Time report for every process the VI made

    how can I know the most time consumig part of my VI 
    in other words can i make somthing let me know how long every part in my VI took ? 
    thanks
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    hii GrerdW
    I thik this will help me alot
    thaanks alot

  • Target Vs Acual Cost Comparison for multiple process orders

    Dear SAPians,
    I want to take a report for target vs actual cost for all process orders and product cost collectors created in a particular period. I have checked the standard report KKBC_ORD that serve my purpose but for a single order. I want the same report for multiple process orders and product cost collectors.
    Is there any standard report or should I create a report painter report. I have tried to create a report painter report based on library 7KO, but target cost was not showing for selected order.
    Kindly suggest.
    Shirazi

    Target Costs are available in library 601 for internal orders (and can be used for process/production orders).
    Regards,
    Adrian

  • Setting timeout settings for Action Scripts

    We are using OIM 11gR1 along with the AD and Domino connectors. We are also using Action Scripts to perform some post create actions on the AD and Domino resources that get created by OIM. The action scripts are being invoked with the correct set of parameters and they do their job. However for both connectors, the connector server (Java connector server for Domino, .NET connector server for AD) times out when waiting for the script to complete. Our scripts are expected to take a long time (30+ seconds).
    Based on our testing, the AD connector times out in 30 seconds, and the Domino connector times out in 20 seconds. You would get the below exception in your Java Connector Server log file:
    Dec 4, 2013 2:36:41 PM org.identityconnectors.framework.api.operations.ScriptOnConnectorApiOp runScriptOnConnector
    FINE: Exception:
    java.lang.RuntimeException: Timeout waiting for action, process was terminated
        at org.identityconnectors.domino.WinJni._executeWinCommand(Native Method)
        at org.identityconnectors.domino.WinJni.executeWinCommand(WinJni.java:31)
        at org.identityconnectors.domino.ScriptOnConnector.executeCmdScript(ScriptOnConnector.java:143)
        at org.identityconnectors.domino.ScriptOnConnector.runScriptOnConnector(ScriptOnConnector.java:88)
        at org.identityconnectors.domino.DominoConnector.runScriptOnConnector(DominoConnector.java:316)
    Is there any way to configure OIM so that it waits longer for the action script to complete. The real problem over here is that if 2 users are being provisioned to AD and/or Domino simultaneously (we use access policies to trigger provisioning rules), then the connector (Java or .NET) does NOT invoke the action script for the second user if the action script for the first user times out. It does however create AD/Domino resources for all applicable users. This in itself is a defect - but I need a workaround.
    Looking at some old Sun Identity Manager documentation (which became Oracle Waveset), it seems that the entire OIM concept of action scripts has its origins in Sun Identity Manager/Oracle Waveset. And these products did support the notion of timeouts. Have a look at :
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19225-01/821-0092/bzbuc/index.html
    Does anyone familiar with Oracle OIM code know if custom timeouts are supported by AD and Domino connectors?
    Thanks
    Aspi Engineer

    Change the time for the below under 'Web Intelligence Processing Server'
    Idle Document Timeout (seconds):
    Idle Connection Timeout (minutes):
    If you still have problem then try changing the web.xml under the following war files,
    AdminTools
    PartnerPlatformService
    PerformanceManagement
    PlatformServices

  • Scheduling WebI reports for Dynamic Prompts

    Hi All,
    Please find my requirement
    Scenario 1:-
    I am having 30 Different Process Code ( 10 –OAR; 20 – Credit USA; 40 – New Sales etc.) in our project.
    Currently I am developing a single report for each “Process Code”. (Total 30 Reports – Templates and query will be 98% same except for different Process Code).
    Let us assume that “End user” will not have BO Access. So all the developed reports will be scheduled and sent to the corresponding end user as BO PDF format.
    Our Requirement:-
    In near future, we will be getting “New Process Code” in data. So the End User wants report for “New Process Code” also.
    Is there a way so that we can automate BO to pass each and every Process Code separately to existing BO report and get multiple instance BO PDF output report (One for each Process Code)?
    Please give me some solution to achieve this.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Tharini

    Hi Arijit,
    Thank you for your response. Irrespective of the recipients i need to pass dynamic parameters separately to existig BO report and should get multiple BO Pdf output for all recipient.
    Currently I am having only 30 values. So as of now I can pass these 30 values separately to BO WebI report and Schedule separately for 30 instances.
    What if i get 2 New values (Value 1, Value 2) next week and want to view the BO Pdf reports for these 2 values separately (2 New Reports for Value 1 and Value 2 separately)?
    How I can achieve these? Is it possible with publishing? If so, please explain it to me.
    Thanks,
    Tharini

  • BackGround Task to execute report is 'IN PROCESS'

    Hello Experts,
    I have developd a workflow where i have added a task which will execute a report in background as code below -
    SUBMIT rhakti00
         USING SELECTION-SCREEN 1000
        WITH SELECTION-TABLE rspar
          AND RETURN.
    The output of the report is not relevant for my req so i dnt need to display the output of report after thts y i want to run this report in background.
    Now,while executing the task ,the report has started executing in background perfectly but tht task remain in 'IN PROCESS' status. When i checked the tRFC for that task so its showing me mesaage that - "Screen output without connection to user."
    Plz suggest how to complete my background task.
    Regards
    Nitin

    thnks for the reply Kiran,
    regarding ur point to send report output to many users....i want to make it clear tht i dont need to send or display the output of the report. I just need to execute the report in background and task shud get complete.
    Also,Can u plz explain it further abt writing code in FM and thn get the output in export or table parameter.......i mean which field or which table of which type shud i use in export or table paramenters of FM. if u can tell me somethg in coding also..tht will ne helpful...
    Regards
    Nitin

  • Clean Job: Guided Procedures - Locked Objects & Background Action Process Q

    I opened this thread also in Portal Content Development thread,
    but I think its more useful here:
    Hi Experts,
    We are running several Workflows on our Portal, they often lock objects and use the background action processor queue.
    You can unlock these objectes manually by selection 'Unlock Objects' (which is below Guided Procedures - Administration)
    And you can delete the successfull processed action queues (Guided Procedures - Administration - Maintain Queues).
    Is it possible to this in a weekly running job? All objects should be unlocked, the queue should only be deleted for actions which where processed successfully and are older then a date.
    Is this possible?
    Thanks for any help,
    Chris

    Hi Sitarama,
    <br/>
    <br/>Thanks very much for your fast reply. Yes, the smartforms are custom-built. Besides the deadlock error, there still has some errors in SP01 says "Could not pass request to host spool system". But it previews wonderfully in SP01. The detailed SP01 error log is like below:
    Print request processing log
    Errors occurred processing this print request
    Error during print request output. l_rc = 99
    There may be no printout
    Most important attributes of spool request
    Request number 2828
    Request name SMART  LOCA 8000199
    Client 800
    Owner 8000199
    Request attributes
    Time created   2010120906014800
    Remaining life  +00007235800
    Dispo 1 (Go/Hold) G
    Dispo 2 (Keep/Delete)     D
    Dispo 3 (Indirect/Direct) D
    Default output device LOCA
    Default no. copies  1
    Format ZTEST
    Main print request characteristics
    Spool request number 2828
    Print request number 1
    Print request attributes
    Time created   2010120906020500
    Output device LOCA
    Format ZTEST
    What do you mean parallel processing on table level? The smartforms extract data from different SAP tables and then transfer to smartform interface, then they can added in form pages. Do you think this results parallel processing towards tables?
    <br/>
    Thank you and hope to hear more from you.
    Best Regards,
    Jeff

  • How to create a report with selection screen that can run in background

    Sorry to ask these basic questions but I am knew to ABAP Programming.
    To keep it simply, I am attempting to create a report that has a simple parameter driven selections screen with one field.  That field takes in a folder path from the user.  The user executes the report.  The report creates a simply BDC that goes into SE16, gathers data from a table, and exports the results to a text file using the folder path provided.  I created a variant for the folder path field in the selection screen hoping to use it while executing the report in the background.  The report is not exporting the file as it did when run in the foreground for some reason.
    I am wondering what event is triggered when a report is executed in the background.  In the foreground (or when I execute the program via SE38->Execute->With Variant) the user needs to execute the program by hitting the execute button once the variant has populated the folder path field.  It works then, so I am trying to get the same to work in the background.  I am thinking I didn't put the program together correctly to accommodate the running in the background.  How can you create a report that can accept user input via variant into a selection screen and then run in the background?
    Please, any information would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks you all for reading this!!!

    Ok, finally I understand what you're doing. Initially you lost me with the SE16 reference...
    Not sure what you're trying to achieve overall, but apart from the fact that you cannot export/download a file to a user's PC via background job (unless you have a mapped network share on the server or something like an FTP server on the user's PC, but both are pretty hypothetical scenarios and unlikely to occur).
    Also, the BDC approach to get data via SE16 is pretty awkward. Note that SE16 is guarded by some authorization checks and often users won't have access in production (which might not matter if you intend to always run your program in background via dedicated batch user). However, I have no clue why you wouldn't want to use [open SQL|http://help.sap.com/abapdocu_70/en/ABENOPEN_SQL_READING.htm] to read the data. You could then save it on the application server or if you really have to get it to the user you can consider e-mailing the file (extracts should be compressed before sending). For the latter you'll find plenty of references here, basically it's the [business communication services|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/2d/1c5d3aebba4c38e10000000a114084/frameset.htm] that you'd need to look at.

  • Data of alv report in  excel file in background processing using open datas

    Hi Experts,
    I have developed report for purchase register . if i execute this report in background process i am not able to get the downloaded file in excel and output is also not coming properly, columns are going to overlap.
    i used open dataset  read dataset and close dataset but still problem is not solved. so if anyone have code with this and also which will have concatenate statement in the code send it.
    Regards,
    Rahul

    Hi Rahul,
    Ur code shud be like below:
    DATA : l_filename2 TYPE string,
                v_extn.
        SPLIT p_filename AT '.xls' INTO l_filename2  v_extn.
        CONCATENATE l_filename2  'downloaded'  INTO l_filename2  SEPARATED BY '_'.
        CONCATENATE l_filename2  'txt'   INTO l_filename2 SEPARATED BY '.'.
        OPEN DATASET l_filename2 IN TEXT MODE FOR OUTPUT ENCODING DEFAULT.
        IF sy-subrc <> 0.
          MESSAGE e499(sy) WITH text-e02.
        ENDIF.
        LOOP AT it_order_number INTO wa_order_number.
          TRANSFER wa_order_number TO l_filename2.
        ENDLOOP.
        CLOSE DATASET l_filename2.
    Now, go to tcode AL11 and check it in the Application server itself.
    Hope this helps,
    Regards,
    Arnab.

  • Need help to analysis "foreground and background wait events" on statspack report for oracle database 11.2.0.4 on AIX

    Hi: I'm analyzing this STATSPACK report: it is "volume test" on our UAT server, so most input is from 'bind variables'.  Our shared pool is well utilized in oracle.  Oracle redo logs is not appropriately configured on this server, as in 'Top 5 wait events' there are 2 for redos.
    I need to know what else information can be dig-out from 'foreground wait events' & 'background wait events', and what can assist us to better understanding, in combination of 'Top 5 wait event's, that how the server/test went?  it could be overwelming No. of wait events, so appreciate any helpful diagnostic or analysis.  Database is oracle 11.2.0.4 upgraded from 11.2.0.3, on IBM AIX power system 64bit, level 6.x
    STATSPACK report for
    Database    DB Id    Instance     Inst Num  Startup Time   Release     RAC
    ~~~~~~~~ ----------- ------------ -------- --------------- ----------- ---
    700000XXX   XXX              1 22-Apr-15 12:12 11.2.0.4.0  NO
    Host Name             Platform                CPUs Cores Sockets   Memory (G)
    ~~~~ ---------------- ---------------------- ----- ----- ------- ------------
         dXXXX_XXX    AIX-Based Systems (64-     2     1       0         16.0
    Snapshot       Snap Id     Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess Comment
    ~~~~~~~~    ---------- ------------------ -------- --------- ------------------
    Begin Snap:       5635 22-Apr-15 13:00:02      114       4.6
      End Snap:       5636 22-Apr-15 14:00:01      128       8.8
       Elapsed:      59.98 (mins) Av Act Sess:       0.6
       DB time:      35.98 (mins)      DB CPU:      19.43 (mins)
    Cache Sizes            Begin        End
    ~~~~~~~~~~~       ---------- ----------
        Buffer Cache:     2,064M              Std Block Size:         8K
         Shared Pool:     3,072M                  Log Buffer:    13,632K
    Load Profile              Per Second    Per Transaction    Per Exec    Per Call
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~      ------------------  ----------------- ----------- -----------
          DB time(s):                0.6                0.0        0.00        0.00
           DB CPU(s):                0.3                0.0        0.00        0.00
           Redo size:          458,720.6            8,755.7
       Logical reads:           12,874.2              245.7
       Block changes:            1,356.4               25.9
      Physical reads:                6.6                0.1
    Physical writes:               61.8                1.2
          User calls:            2,033.7               38.8
              Parses:              286.5                5.5
         Hard parses:                0.5                0.0
    W/A MB processed:                1.7                0.0
              Logons:                1.2                0.0
            Executes:              801.1               15.3
           Rollbacks:                6.1                0.1
        Transactions:               52.4
    Instance Efficiency Indicators
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                Buffer Nowait %:  100.00       Redo NoWait %:  100.00
                Buffer  Hit   %:   99.98  Optimal W/A Exec %:  100.00
                Library Hit   %:   99.77        Soft Parse %:   99.82
             Execute to Parse %:   64.24         Latch Hit %:   99.98
    Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %:   53.15     % Non-Parse CPU:   98.03
    Shared Pool Statistics        Begin   End
                 Memory Usage %:   10.50   12.79
        % SQL with executions>1:   69.98   78.37
      % Memory for SQL w/exec>1:   70.22   81.96
    Top 5 Timed Events                                                    Avg %Total
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                                                   wait   Call
    Event                                            Waits    Time (s)   (ms)   Time
    CPU time                                                       847          50.2
    enq: TX - row lock contention                    4,480         434     97   25.8
    log file sync                                  284,169         185      1   11.0
    log file parallel write                        299,537         164      1    9.7
    log file sequential read                           698          16     24    1.0
    Host CPU  (CPUs: 2  Cores: 1  Sockets: 0)
    ~~~~~~~~              Load Average
                          Begin     End      User  System    Idle     WIO     WCPU
                           1.16    1.84     19.28   14.51   66.21    1.20   82.01
    Instance CPU
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~                                       % Time (seconds)
                         Host: Total time (s):                  7,193.8
                      Host: Busy CPU time (s):                  2,430.7
                       % of time Host is Busy:      33.8
                 Instance: Total CPU time (s):                  1,203.1
              % of Busy CPU used for Instance:      49.5
            Instance: Total Database time (s):                  2,426.4
      %DB time waiting for CPU (Resource Mgr):       0.0
    Memory Statistics                       Begin          End
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                ------------ ------------
                      Host Mem (MB):     16,384.0     16,384.0
                       SGA use (MB):      7,136.0      7,136.0
                       PGA use (MB):        282.5        361.4
        % Host Mem used for SGA+PGA:         45.3         45.8
    Foreground Wait Events  DB/Inst: XXXXXs  Snaps: 5635-5636
    -> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
    -> ordered by Total Wait Time desc, Waits desc (idle events last)
                                                                 Avg          %Total
                                              %Tim Total Wait   wait    Waits   Call
    Event                               Waits  out   Time (s)   (ms)     /txn   Time
    enq: TX - row lock contentio        4,480    0        434     97      0.0   25.8
    log file sync                     284,167    0        185      1      1.5   11.0
    Disk file operations I/O            8,741    0          4      0      0.0     .2
    direct path write                  13,247    0          3      0      0.1     .2
    db file sequential read             6,058    0          1      0      0.0     .1
    buffer busy waits                   1,800    0          1      1      0.0     .1
    SQL*Net more data to client        29,161    0          1      0      0.2     .1
    direct path read                    7,696    0          1      0      0.0     .0
    db file scattered read                316    0          1      2      0.0     .0
    latch: shared pool                    144    0          0      2      0.0     .0
    CSS initialization                     30    0          0      3      0.0     .0
    cursor: pin S                          10    0          0      9      0.0     .0
    row cache lock                         41    0          0      2      0.0     .0
    latch: row cache objects               19    0          0      3      0.0     .0
    log file switch (private str            8    0          0      7      0.0     .0
    library cache: mutex X                 28    0          0      2      0.0     .0
    latch: cache buffers chains            54    0          0      1      0.0     .0
    latch free                            290    0          0      0      0.0     .0
    control file sequential read        1,568    0          0      0      0.0     .0
    log file switch (checkpoint             4    0          0      6      0.0     .0
    direct path sync                        8    0          0      3      0.0     .0
    latch: redo allocation                 60    0          0      0      0.0     .0
    SQL*Net break/reset to clien           34    0          0      1      0.0     .0
    latch: enqueue hash chains             45    0          0      0      0.0     .0
    latch: cache buffers lru cha            7    0          0      2      0.0     .0
    latch: session allocation               5    0          0      1      0.0     .0
    latch: object queue header o            6    0          0      1      0.0     .0
    ASM file metadata operation            30    0          0      0      0.0     .0
    latch: In memory undo latch            15    0          0      0      0.0     .0
    latch: undo global data                 8    0          0      0      0.0     .0
    SQL*Net message from client     6,362,536    0    278,225     44     33.7
    jobq slave wait                     7,270  100      3,635    500      0.0
    SQL*Net more data from clien        7,976    0         15      2      0.0
    SQL*Net message to client       6,362,544    0          8      0     33.7
    Background Wait Events  DB/Inst: XXXXXs  Snaps: 5635-5636
    -> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
    -> ordered by Total Wait Time desc, Waits desc (idle events last)
                                                                 Avg          %Total
                                              %Tim Total Wait   wait    Waits   Call
    Event                               Waits  out   Time (s)   (ms)     /txn   Time
    log file parallel write           299,537    0        164      1      1.6    9.7
    log file sequential read              698    0         16     24      0.0    1.0
    db file parallel write              9,556    0         13      1      0.1     .8
    os thread startup                     146    0         10     70      0.0     .6
    control file parallel write         2,037    0          2      1      0.0     .1
    Log archive I/O                        35    0          1     30      0.0     .1
    LGWR wait for redo copy             2,447    0          0      0      0.0     .0
    db file async I/O submit            9,556    0          0      0      0.1     .0
    db file sequential read               145    0          0      2      0.0     .0
    Disk file operations I/O              349    0          0      0      0.0     .0
    db file scattered read                 30    0          0      4      0.0     .0
    control file sequential read        5,837    0          0      0      0.0     .0
    ADR block file read                    19    0          0      4      0.0     .0
    ADR block file write                    5    0          0     15      0.0     .0
    direct path write                      14    0          0      2      0.0     .0
    direct path read                        3    0          0      7      0.0     .0
    latch: shared pool                      3    0          0      6      0.0     .0
    log file single write                  56    0          0      0      0.0     .0
    latch: redo allocation                 53    0          0      0      0.0     .0
    latch: active service list              1    0          0      3      0.0     .0
    latch free                             11    0          0      0      0.0     .0
    rdbms ipc message                 314,523    5     57,189    182      1.7
    Space Manager: slave idle wa        4,086   88     18,996   4649      0.0
    DIAG idle wait                      7,185  100      7,186   1000      0.0
    Streams AQ: waiting for time            2   50      4,909 ######      0.0
    Streams AQ: qmn slave idle w          129    0      3,612  28002      0.0
    Streams AQ: qmn coordinator           258   50      3,612  14001      0.0
    smon timer                             43    2      3,605  83839      0.0
    pmon timer                          1,199   99      3,596   2999      0.0
    SQL*Net message from client        17,019    0         31      2      0.1
    SQL*Net message to client          12,762    0          0      0      0.1
    class slave wait                       28    0          0      0      0.0
    thank you very much!

    Hi: just know it now: it is a large amount of 'concurrent transaction' designed in this "Volume Test" - to simulate large incoming transaction volme, so I guess wait in eq:TX - row is expected.
    The fact: (1) redo logs at uat server is known to not well-tune for configurations (2) volume test slow 5%, however data amount in its test is kept the same by each time import  production data, by the team. So why it slowed 5% this year?
    The wait histogram is pasted below, any one interest to take a look?  any ideas?
    Wait Event Histogram  DB/Inst: XXXX/XXXX  Snaps: 5635-5636
    -> Total Waits - units: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
    -> % of Waits - column heading: <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
    -> % of Waits - value: .0 indicates value was <.05%, null is truly 0
    -> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
                               Total ----------------- % of Waits ------------------
    Event                      Waits  <1ms  <2ms  <4ms  <8ms <16ms <32ms  <=1s   >1s
    ADR block file read          19   26.3   5.3  10.5  57.9
    ADR block file write          5                     40.0        60.0
    ADR file lock                 6  100.0
    ARCH wait for archivelog l   14  100.0
    ASM file metadata operatio   30  100.0
    CSS initialization           30              100.0
    Disk file operations I/O   9090   97.2   1.4    .6    .4    .2    .1    .1
    LGWR wait for redo copy    2447   98.5    .5    .4    .2    .2    .2    .1
    Log archive I/O              35   40.0         8.6  25.7   2.9        22.9
    SQL*Net break/reset to cli   34   85.3   8.8         5.9
    SQL*Net more data to clien   29K  99.9    .0    .0    .0          .0    .0
    buffer busy waits          1800   96.8    .7    .7    .6    .3    .4    .5
    control file parallel writ 2037   90.7   5.0   2.1    .8   1.0    .3    .1
    control file sequential re 7405  100.0                      .0
    cursor: pin S                10   10.0                    90.0
    db file async I/O submit   9556   99.9    .0                .0          .0
    db file parallel read         1  100.0
    db file parallel write     9556   62.0  32.4   1.7    .8   1.5   1.3    .1
    db file scattered read      345   72.8   3.8   2.3  11.6   9.0    .6
    db file sequential read    6199   97.2    .2    .3   1.6    .7    .0    .0
    direct path read           7699   99.1    .4    .2    .1    .1    .0
    direct path sync              8   25.0  37.5  12.5  25.0
    direct path write            13K  97.8    .9    .5    .4    .3    .1    .0
    enq: TX - row lock content 4480     .4    .7   1.3   3.0   6.8  12.3  75.4    .1
    latch free                  301   98.3    .3    .7    .7
    latch: In memory undo latc   15   93.3   6.7
    latch: active service list    1              100.0
    latch: cache buffers chain   55   94.5                     3.6   1.8
    latch: cache buffers lru c    9   88.9                    11.1
    latch: call allocation        6  100.0
    latch: checkpoint queue la    3  100.0
    latch: enqueue hash chains   45   97.8                     2.2
    latch: messages               4  100.0
    latch: object queue header    7   85.7        14.3
    latch: redo allocation      113   97.3               1.8    .9
    latch: row cache objects     19   89.5                           5.3   5.3
    latch: session allocation     5   80.0              20.0
    latch: shared pool          147   90.5   1.4   2.7   1.4    .7   1.4   2.0
    latch: undo global data       8  100.0
    library cache: mutex X       28   89.3         3.6         3.6         3.6
    log file parallel write     299K  95.6   2.6   1.0    .4    .3    .2    .0
    log file sequential read    698   29.5    .1               4.6  46.8  18.9
    log file single write        56  100.0
    log file switch (checkpoin    4               25.0  50.0  25.0
    log file switch (private s    8         12.5        37.5  50.0
    log file sync               284K  93.3   3.7   1.4    .7    .5    .3    .1
    os thread startup           146                                      100.0
    row cache lock               41   85.4   9.8               2.4         2.4
    DIAG idle wait             7184                                      100.0
    SQL*Net message from clien 6379K  86.6   5.1   2.9   1.3    .7    .3   2.8    .3
    SQL*Net message to client  6375K 100.0    .0    .0    .0    .0    .0    .0
    Wait Event Histogram  DB/Inst: XXXX/xxxx  Snaps: 5635-5636
    -> Total Waits - units: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
    -> % of Waits - column heading: <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
    -> % of Waits - value: .0 indicates value was <.05%, null is truly 0
    -> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
                               Total ----------------- % of Waits ------------------
    Event                      Waits  <1ms  <2ms  <4ms  <8ms <16ms <32ms  <=1s   >1s
    SQL*Net more data from cli 7976   99.7    .1    .1    .0                      .1
    Space Manager: slave idle  4086     .1    .2    .0    .0    .3         3.2  96.1
    Streams AQ: qmn coordinato  258   49.2                .8                    50.0
    Streams AQ: qmn slave idle  129                                            100.0
    Streams AQ: waiting for ti    2   50.0                                      50.0
    class slave wait             28   92.9   3.6   3.6
    jobq slave wait            7270     .0                               100.0
    pmon timer                 1199                                            100.0
    rdbms ipc message           314K  10.3   7.3  39.7  15.4  10.6   5.3   8.2   3.3
    smon timer                   43                                            100.0

  • Standard PNP selection screen problem in reason for action type

    Hi all,
    We have used standard PNP in one of our report program.
    The input for 'Reason for Action' (excluding a particular reason for action ) has no effect on the actual selection of data from the PNP. i.e. even if a particular reason for action is excluded in the selection, record pertaining to that action for reason is still picked in the PNP selection and passed on to the program through Get PERNR statement.
    The above problem seems to affect all the standard and custom HR Reports as well.
    Please advise on how exactly the excluding of a particular reason for action work in selection through PNP and is there anyway to solve the problem.
    eagerly waiting for your response.
    Thanking You,
    Regards.
    Deepak

    Thanks for your response,
    We tried but it did not work.
    Our code is as follows,
    INITIALIZATION.
    W_REPID = SY-REPID.
    PERFORM CREATE_RANGES.
    START-OF-SELECTION.
    GET PERNR.
    RP-PROVIDE-FROM-LAST P0000 SPACE PN-BEGDA PN-ENDDA.
    PERFORM GET_DATA.
    END-OF-SELECTION
    If you could give us your email id, we would email the screen shots of the selection screen and the output.
    my email id - [email protected]
    Thanking You,
    Regards
    Deepak

Maybe you are looking for

  • Changes in viewing options in iTunes 8

    Hi all, I have had a disappointment with iTunes 8 in terms of the viewing options. I used to view and sort through my library in the list view mode where I would have 3 columns to choose from genre, artist, and album. This was a very convenient and r

  • Audio navigator disappears after 'play' in iBook

    after pressing the empty space it reappears. it does not happen in ios 6.0.1 anyone else? or is this a bug?

  • Icons in DagaGrid Fields

    I'd like to know how can I put an icon instead of text in a DataGrid field. I saw it done in this application. The first column of every row can be marked with a heart icon. Here is a screenshot. I'd highly appreciate any help! Thanks!

  • Unable to start node manager of WebLogic 12c on OEL 5.9 64 bit

    Hi, I have WLS 12 running on OEL 5.9 64 bit. The installation ise JDK  instead of the default JRockit. The version of Java that has been installed is from rpm: jdk-7u25-linux-x64.rpm I have created a domain. I am unable to start the Node Manager the

  • "No workflow started. Application error occured"

    Dear Gurus, Our user has encounter approval workflow problem. Shopping cart was created and ordered with status "Awaiting Approval". However, when viewing "Approval Overview", it shows that "No workflow started. Application error occured". Approver h