Separate notice per dunning level check box

Hi
While do FBMP Dunning customization, I have not selected the "separate notice per dunning level check box" and saved the Dunning procedure in Transport and released from Development system.
Whereas while do assinging the dunning procedure in the Customer Master in Quality system. The system showing error message "No dunning settings have been maintained for company code:abc
How can I do the settings for "separate notice per dunning level check box" in the system?
Thanks,
Sahara

Go to tCode FBMP Then menu bar select Environment->company code data then enter your company code and select your account type(customer/vendor) -> for your company code tick on by dunning level

Similar Messages

Dunning Key and minimum amount per dunning level

Dear Friends,
Can any one please explain the dunnig key functions?
While defining the minimum amout their is two terms one is open item and another one is total amount.
The definintion of total amount is all the items in an account means the items which are paid also? because I am confuse to understand the differece between total amount and open items. Please expain the both the terms.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Mahendra Dev

Dear Rajeev,
Lots of thanks for your reply.
as per my understanding on behalf of your explanation.
Total Open item can be total of item in grace period and also the item which is in dunning level
and the total item only the total of item which is in dunning level.
I am in the mid of chapter of Minimum amount per dunning level.
and want to clear the term the relation between the total amount and the total open items be greater than a minimum percentage.
Please confirm. Lots of thanks in advance.
Regards,
Mahendra Dev

Extras -- Settings -- Show First level check box is missing?

Hello,
Did anyone face this error in sap screen Extras --> Settings --> Show First level check box is missing?
Thanks in advance.

Did you get this error msg when you login to SAP ?
What is the version of GUI ? check if you can update GUI and see if still prompting the error msg

Dunning letter split per dunning level

Hello,
I have a requirement to print separate dunning letters per level for each customer (2 level procedure, 10days and 17days). The problem is that we have all levels in the dunning letter being printed out now; 0, 1, 2. We probably can live with having 1 and 2, how can we avoid the 0. I have removed the check for box 'print all items' but it still prints any item which has been due for more than a day. I would like only items with level 1 or 2 to be displayed.
I am seeing some documentation which suggests that we can do that at company code level, but not sure where.

Hi
When you have area 0 1 and 2 you can set the values from 1 and to 2 in 0 and 1.
In you Dunning letter you have to meve the texts to.
In your sap script /form you can say start on a next page for the next dunning level. When the Header and Footer is set up correct, only (sub)totals by level you can sent it out as 2 letters

Calculate Excise amount as per duty rates check box in J1IEX

Hi,
              In J1IEX Duty rates tab, there is one check box as Calculate excise duty base on duty rates , but thta check box is Disable i How to make it as enable so that we can click to to recalculate the excise rate,
also my problem is that in case of import PO, the basic price in our PO is diffrent compare to basic price of custom . because custom is addding the basic frieght and insurance charges in Basic price, so while Doing J1IEX ref. to MIRO number it is taking properly amount of all excise duties but excise base amount is diffrent and when we correct the excise base amount as per custom Bill of entry all excise amount are change and it is not coming as per duty rates which are present i Duty rates tab so I want to recalculate it.
regards,
zafar

Hi ,
             As per detail which I have mention in my question, the process which we are following is after recieving import Material   first we are doing   MIRO for custom delivery cost   and there we are entering tax amount as per custom bill of entry,   and we are getting the MIRO Documnet number    after that we are Doing    Capture Excise invoice thorugh J1IEX and ref. document we are selecting as PO, after pressing enter we get a small pop up window as customs invocie number and year there we are entering the MIRO document number and Year   then ref. to that miro number All duty and duty rates are coming as per MIRO   but Excise base amount is different because it is coming from PO basic amount and there is diffrence between Custom excise base amount and PO bae amount becasue in custom bae amount they are adding frieght basic amount into excise base amount , and then we have to correct amnually exsice base amount in J1IEX   for all materials, is this proceess is same in all or we need to do some modification in pricing procedure or at any other place .
          At bottom in excsie duty tab in J1IEX there is one check box as Calculates excise amount base on excise duty but that check box is also disable   How to make that enable.
I also have found one FM : J_1IEX_DEFAULT_EXCISE_DUTY,   by doing some changes in this FM we can get what we requied , is there any other solution to get our requirement.
regards,
   zafar
Edited by: zafar_karnalkar on May 15, 2010 1:47 PM

Dunning Level Repeated in Dunning Run

Hi,
We need your help in resolving a peculiar issue we are facing relating to Dunning:
The Dunning Activity is picking up Contract Accounts repeatedly at the same Dunning Level.
For example,
the Contract Account CA - 1 contains two open items:
Document Number
Due Date
Dunning Procedure
Document 1
01.06.2014
ZA
Document 2
05.06.2014
ZA
the Dunning Procedure ZA contains 4 Dunning Levels as follows:
Dunning Procedure
Dunning Level
Days in Arrear
ZA
1
10
ZA
2
20
ZA
3
30
ZA
4
40
While analyzing the issue we are facing, we have observed that one of the scenarios when the Contract Account is repeatedly picked at the same dunning level is the following:
if the Contract Account - CA - 1 is picked in the Dunning Activity Run at Dunning Level 3 for the Dunning Procedure ZA on 30.06.2014(when the Document 1 is reaching the days in arrear for Dunning Level 3)
The same Contract Account - CA - 1 is picked in the Dunning Activity Run at same Dunning Level 3 for the Dunning Procedure ZA once again on 05.07.2014(when the Document 2 is reaching the days in arrear for Dunning Level 3)
The scenario mentioned above is not the only scenario when we are facing this issue of Contract Account getting picked at the same dunning level repeatedly.
The Dunning Procedure mentioned in the example has been configured as follows:
The field - Always Dun, has not been checked.
The correct days difference between two Dunning levels has been maintained in the field - Dunning frequency for every Dunning level.
The field - Days in arrears, has been maintained correctly for each of the Dunning Levels
But as per the business requirement and our understanding of the behaviour of standard SAP, the Contract Account - CA - 1 which is picked at the Dunning Level 3 for the Dunning Procedure ZA on 30.06.2014, should be picked in the Dunning Activity Run only when:
the open item in the CA- 1 remains outstanding till the number of days to reach the next Dunning Level, which in this example would be reached when the outstanding item remains open for 40 days (CA - 1 would reach Dunning Level 4)
Further, As per the F1 help mentioned for the field - Dunning frequency:
The second dunning notice at dunning level 3 is prevented if you specify a dunning frequency of 10 days for dunning level 3. In that case, a dunning notice at dunning level 4 will be created ONLY on 10.07.2014, since the days in arrears for dunning level 4 have been reached.
So currently, the system is behaving in a way which is contradicting the details mentioned in F1 help.
Please advise how can we ensure that the CA - 1 is not picked up at the same Dunning Level repeatedly and confirms with the details mentioned in the F1 help.
Thanks and regards,
G. Ajit Kumar

Hi Ajit,
Check the parameter value for the last dunning level against the dunning procedure ZA in the SPRO config.
I think it is currently configured as 2-Dun after end of dunning frequency for all line items.
Ideally it should be 3-Dunning for new overdue items only
You can find this in the following config-
SPRO-->Financial Accounting--->Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable-->Business Transactions-->Dunning--->Configure Dunning Procedure
Select the Dunning Procedure and click on display and you will find it under the parameters section.
Hope it helps...
Thanks,
Amlan

Check Box in Header of ALV GRID only............

Hi Experts,
Can anyone help me out... in keeping the Check box at the Header Level.....
This requirement is in the copy of the standard transaction "ME2N".
1. In ME2N when you click on the Chage Layout button of ALV grid
and choose "Sorting" tabe.
2. Add any 3 fields say 1. Vendor/Supply plant 2. Purchasing group and 3. Purchasing document in the Sort criteria and choose accending order radio button and check box in the sum .
3. Now click on the Displayed Column tab and remove the above 3 fields from the Displayed colums and add it column set
4. Now report shows the heirarchial one in the sorting manner.
5. I want the Check Boxes at all levels both in the header and the item level.
When I click on the Header level check box all the item level check box should get checked. When I add the check box in the field catalog I am able to see the check box in the item level only because only item level data appears in the internal table and Header level is displayed based on the ALV grid sorting option and that row records are unknown in the internal table.
Is there some thing which I can do to get the check box at the header level retaining all the functionality of ME2N and ALV GRID.....
It would be great help if some one solves me this issue... Points will be awarded.
Br,
Laxmi.

Hi Bharath,
Thanks for your response. Select ALL already existing... My requirement is not to get the whole report records selected at particular level all items and header should get selected. Say for example I have Vendor2 i.e, vendor 1 and vendor2. So in the Vendor 1 i will have Purchasing group1 , Purchasing document 1 and say 10 items under Purchasing document. say same as like in Vendor2. So if Click on the Vendor1 all the sub items of it have to selected so that I can perform further action only for these items not for the enter items of the report.
Br,
Laxmi.

Single or multiple check box values displayed in a text field

My apologies, this may be a duplicate discussion.
I'm using the following script to display the values of check boxes in a text field. I would like the word "and" to separate the values if two check boxes are selected. If more than two boxes are selected I want the values to be separated by a comma and then the last value be separated by "and". Example of two check boxes selected: A and B. Example of two or more: A, B, C, and D. Can this be done?
form1.page1.page1SF.programs::calculate - (JavaScript, client)
//displays the values of check boxes named programCB
var aChkBx = [];
var vChecks = programCB.all;
for (var a=0; a<vChecks.length;a++){
if(!vChecks.item(a).isNull) {
aChkBx.push(vChecks.item(a).rawValue);
this.rawValue = aChkBx.join(", ");

My apologies, this may be a duplicate discussion.
I'm using the following script to display the values of check boxes in a text field. I would like the word "and" to separate the values if two check boxes are selected. If more than two boxes are selected I want the values to be separated by a comma and then the last value be separated by "and". Example of two check boxes selected: A and B. Example of two or more: A, B, C, and D. Can this be done?
form1.page1.page1SF.programs::calculate - (JavaScript, client)
//displays the values of check boxes named programCB
var aChkBx = [];
var vChecks = programCB.all;
for (var a=0; a<vChecks.length;a++){
if(!vChecks.item(a).isNull) {
aChkBx.push(vChecks.item(a).rawValue);
this.rawValue = aChkBx.join(", ");

Single or multiple check box values displayed in a textbox

Hi Experts!
I'm using the following script to display the values of check boxes in a text field. I would like the word "and" to separate the values if two check boxes are selected. If more than two boxes are selected I want the values to be separated by a comma and then the last value be separated by "and". Example of two check boxes selected: A and B. Example of two or more: A, B, C, and D. Can this be done?
form1.page1.page1SF.programs::calculate - (JavaScript, client)
//displays the values of check boxes named programCB
var aChkBx = [];
var vChecks = programCB.all;
for (var a=0; a<vChecks.length;a++){
if(!vChecks.item(a).isNull) {
aChkBx.push(vChecks.item(a).rawValue);
this.rawValue = aChkBx.join(", ");

So, the way I see it, you actually have four scenarios. Nothing is checked, one item is checked, two items are checked, and three or more items are checked.
Here's how I did it.
I have four checkboxes all with the same name, cb. (You could have many more, and it wouldn't matter as long as they're all named the same thing.) I'm presuming that you will use the captions from the checkboxes as the text you want to enter. I called my text area where I enter the information tfSentence. (It's not a text field, it's just called "Text" in the Object Library.)
//we need to count how many boxes are checked
var checked = 0;
for (i=0; i<=cb.length; i++){
if (xfa.resolveNode("cb["+i+"]").rawValue == 1) checked ++;
//create a string variable to store our sentence
var str = "";
//look at the checked variable and choose our case from that
switch(checked){
case 0:
 //you may want to do more than just type out a sentence here, like a message box
 tfSentence.rawValue = "Nothing was selected";
 break;
case 1:
 //you can set text that will appear before your list of items here
 //str = "preliminary text";
 for (i=0; i<=cb.length; i++){
 if (xfa.resolveNode("cb["+i+"]").rawValue == 1) str += xfa.resolveNode("cb["+i+"].caption.value.#text").value;
 //you can set text to appear after your list of items here
 //str += "ending text";
 tfSentence.rawValue = str;
 break;
case 2:
 //str = "preliminary text";
 for (i=0; i<=cb.length; i++){
 if (xfa.resolveNode("cb["+i+"]").rawValue == 1){
 if (checked == 1) str += " and " + xfa.resolveNode("cb["+i+"].caption.value.#text").value;
 else str += xfa.resolveNode("cb[+i+"].caption.value.#text").value;
 checked--;
 //str+= "ending text";
 tfSentence.rawValue = str;
 break;
default:
 //str = "preliminary text";
 for (i=0; i<=cb.length; i++){
 if (xfa.resolveNode("cb["+i+"]").rawValue == 1){
 if (checked == 1) str += "and " + xfa.resolveNode("cb["+i+"].caption.value.#text").value;
 else str += xfa.resolveNode("cb["+i+"].caption.value.#text").value + ", ";
 checked--;
 //str += "ending text";
 tfSentence.rawValue = str;
 break

Logic for a report with check boxes

Hi All ,
I m writting a report , I need to put FOUR check box in this report ,
For example you can say Check1 ( material1)
 Check2 ( material2)
 Check3 ( material3)
 Others
In selection critriea I defined one select option ( eg materail )
Now I have to diplay data accordingly checkboxes
If Check box 'check1' is selected -list must contains only material1
If Check box 'check2' is selected -list must contains only material2
If Check box 'check3' is selected -list must contains only material3
If Check box 'check1' or any other one is selected -list must contains material1 and other materail as per other selected check box .
If Check box others is selected then all other fields ( except the selected check box ) are the out put of this report .
IF you need more explaination of my query , plz let me know .
Regards ,
Narender

REPORT ZTEST3 line-size 400.
tables : mara.
data i_mara like mara occurs 0 with header line.
data i_marc like marc occurs 0 with header line.
data i_mcha like mcha occurs 0 with header line.
data i_mkol like mkol occurs 0 with header line.
select-options: s_matnr for mara-matnr.
parameters : p_check1 as checkbox.
parameters : p_check2 as checkbox.
parameters : p_check3 as checkbox.
parameters : p_check4 as checkbox.
start-of-selection.
if p_check1 = 'X'.
select * from mara into table i_mara where matnr in s_matnr.
loop at i_mara.
endloop.
endif.
if p_check2 = 'X'.
select * from marc into table i_marc where matnr in s_matnr.
loop at i_marc.
endloop.
endif.
if p_check3 = 'X'.
select * from mcha into table i_mcha where matnr in s_matnr.
loop at i_mcha.
endloop.
endif.
if p_check4 = 'X'.
select * from mkol into table i_mkol where matnr in s_matnr.
loop at i_mkol.
endloop.
endif.

Full Deploy check box

I am tyring to deploy some changes to HFM and noticed the full deploy check box. Can you someboy tell me what's going to happen between checking the full deploy box vs unchecking it ?

From the docs
"Selecting “Full Deploy” ensures that Performance Management Architect includes all dimensions and members in the application in the deployment. If you do not select “Full Deploy,” only dimensions that have been modified since the last deployment are included. Select this option in cases where your Performance Management Architect metadata may be out of sync or your product database or Performance Management Architect database has been restored. (This option can only be selected when redeploying applications.)"
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Dunning Notice per Individual Line Items.

We have a dunning requirement to print individual dunning notice per line item. In fact, SAP standard form will give support for all open items of respective customer. Recently, we have developed a form in such a way that it will consider only one Open line item and it is picking up fine. But the problem it is generating spool request for only first open line item.
In fact, our requirement to generate Dunning Forms (spool requests) for all other open items as well.
If anybody knows how to generate Dunning Form for Individual Open Items, please let us know.
Please consider the above requirement on top priority basis, try to answer or atleast give clue how to achieve it.
Regards.

Hello Sekhar,
I am not sure, but, it is not correct to do Dunning at Individual Line Item level (unlike correspondence).
The reason is that, the Customer Master Data is normally updated once at the end of Dunning Run with the Latest Dunned Date and the appropriate Dunning Level.
If you go for Dunning at individual Item Level, then it is obviously wrong to keep on updating Customer Master.
Hope this info enables you to analyse in the right direction
With Regards
Vijay Gajavalli

Activating auto PO Check Box in the purchasing view for plant level.

Hi Techies,
Right now i have an issue related to auto PO check box in the purchasing view for the plant level. There are three plants A,B,C.. For the plants A and B the automatic PO check box is visible and the user is able to provide input values. But when it comes to plant C the auto PO field is not available and hence the user is unable to provide input for auto PO.
Is there any configuration to be done to activate the auto PO check box in the purchasing view in the material master with respect to plant C?
If so could you please guide me with the settings?
Thanking you in advance.
Regards,
Gopalakrishnan.S
Edited by: krishu100 on Jul 13, 2011 2:25 AM

Hi Techies thanks for you all info.
Now today i just tried to created a new HALB Material in the plant C which i had issues yesterday. But when i created today a new material the Auto PO feild is available for entry. THen i tried to go to the material which i created yesterday for editing it. But i was unable to do it.
I checked the transactions which most of you referred(Very Useful). I found that all the plant s had the same screen selction setting and set as Opt Entry. The field screen referrence for MM01, MM02 Transaction s are also set as opt entry. The screen reference for HALB is also set as Opt entry. Still i m not able to find the field auto PO in the purchasing field.
So does it mean that a material once created without auto PO enabled or visible can never be updated after that? But i think its not the case and we should be able to edit it(correct me if im wrong).
Really having my fingers crossed to find a solution for this issue.
Regards,
Gopalakrishnan.S

Adding check box in VL01n under item level. URGENT PLEASE!!

Hi,
I have the requirement like below.
Add a check box in VL01n / VL02n in item level under loading and shipment" tab.
Could anybody please tell me, is there any user exit? Can we add custom fields in standard loading and shipment screen?
Thanks
Kumar.

Hi Mahendra,
I am not able to find this badi( LE_SHP_TAB_CUST_ITEM) in SE19. I am getting message like 'BAdI implementation LE_SHP_TAB_CUST_ITEM does not exist!'.
Could you please help on this?
Thanks in advance.

Availability check box at schedule line level and requirement class level

Hi All
What is the significance of availability check field at schedule line level and requirement type level.
If I remove the check box at schedule line level, then there won't be any availability check carried out in the sales order, even though in requirement class it is checked. Is it for doing availability once the requirement is passed to MRP...
In make to stock scenario, no availability check is active at schedule line level.
scenario 1. stock is 0 in plant, when i place an order for 10 quantity, does system give any confirmed quantity on so and so date...or the confirmed quantity will be zero or as there is no availability check carried out, it confirms 10 quantity on customer requested delivery date and the time of creation of delivery, it gives an error message stating zero quantity is available. which one is correct in all the above.
In make to order scenario, no availability check is active at schedule line level.
order was created for 10 qty, as there is no availability check active, does the system give some date based on the lead times maintained in the material master or not?
Regards
Sree

Hi sreekar
The significance of availability check at schedule line level is to determine weather availability check and TOR should be carried out for sales orders or not.
If you remove check box at schedule line level , availability check and TOR wont be carried out at sales order level.
Coming to the scenario you said , make to stock , i think the availability check you are using is 01 make it 02. which is planned requirements. and stratergy group as 10. in MRP3 view in MMR. .
as the availability check u have put 01 & stratergy group as 10 availability check doesnt carry
coming to the scenario 2 , if the stock is 0 in plant and if you create a sales order, then the confirmed quantity should be 0 and that particular order will go to backorder processing.
sometimes it confirms the ordered quantity as the confirmed qunatity, and it gives a confiremed delivery date on which the stock is confirmed , but that date is a tentative date.
all these unconfirmed orders will go to backorders. once the qunatity is confirmed automatically , delivery date also will be done
Coming to scenario 3 , when you create MTO order there will be availability check checked at the schedule line level. can you tell wat is the schedule line you are getting is it CP or ND?
for schedule lines , ND - no availability check will be there , PD - availability check will be there
Note: plz check 1st the availability check you have entered in MMR , if it is 01 make it as 02. and then run these cycles.
Reward points if useful and if Any queries let me know
Regards
Srinath
Edited by: sri nath on Mar 21, 2008 7:53 PM

Separate notice per dunning level check box

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for