Service restricted

I have a problem with "vista previa" (the mac os x image viewer). I cannot use the "search with Google" service regulary, a message appears and ask me if i'm sure to use the restricted service. How can I unrestrict this service?

Try this. Open Safari, go to the Safari menu, then Preferences. Under the General tab, click the "Default Web Browser" dropdown list, and re-select "Safari". Close the preference window.
Let me know if that helps. You could also try repairing your permissions from Disk Utility (in the Applications/Utilities folder). Open Disk Utility, click your drive on the left side, and click Repair Disk Permissions.
Matt

Similar Messages

Can't turn on reminder at a location with location services restriction.

I think I may have found a bug, or at least unintended functionality.
I have an iPhone 4s with iOS 5. When I turn on location restrictions (Settings > General > Restrictions > Location > Don't Allow Changes -- note that in this list Reminders is set to ON, which means that location services is ENABLED for this app), then create a new reminder in the reminders app, then try to have it remind me at a location, the "At a Location" switch is disabled, not allowing me to create a reminder with a geofence alert.
When I change the setting to "Allow Changes", the "At a location" switch in Reminders is re-enabled.
Interesting thing is that it works just fine if I create a reminder at a location using Siri.
I'd like to be able to keep the "Don't Allow Changes" restriction on as, if my phone is stolen, I don't want people to be able to turn off location services, thus blocking Find My iPhone.
Anyone else can reproduce/confirmt hat this is a bug?

dav3ypants wrote:
I'd like to be able to keep the "Don't Allow Changes" restriction on as, if my phone is stolen, I don't want people to be able to turn off location services, thus blocking Find My iPhone.
Hate to burst your bubble here, but all a thief has to do is turn your phone off to defeat "Find My Phone". This is common knowledge. Once turned off, a quick restore in iTunes & then listed on eBay or Graigslist.

Error during JNDI lookup Accessing Remote EJB (access to web service restricted using declarative security model)

Hello everyone,
I developed a Web Service prototype accessing remote EJB using the EJB
control with special syntax in the jndi-name attribute: @jws:ejb
home-jndi-name="t3://10.10.245.70:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB"
Everything works fine, but I get an error when I restrict access to my web
service with a declarative security model by implementing steps provided in
help doc:
- Define the web resource you wish to protect
- Define which security role is required to access the web resource
- Define which users are granted the required security role
- Configure WebLogic Server security for my web service(Compatibility
Security/Users)
I launch the service by entering the address in a web browser. When prompted
to accept the digital certificate, click Yes, when prompted for network
authentication information, enter username and password, navigate to the
Test Form tab of Test View, invoke the method by clicking the button and I
get the following exception:
<error>
<faultcode>JWSError</faultcode>
<faultstring>Error during JNDI lookup from
jndi:t3://10.10.245.70:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB[Lookup failed for
name:t3://10.10.245.70:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB]</faultstring>
<detail>
<jwErrorDetail> weblogic.jws.control.ControlException: Error during JNDI
lookup from jndi:t3://10.10.245.70:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB[Lookup failed
for name:t3://10.10.245.70:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB] at
weblogic.knex.control.EJBControlImpl.acquireResources(EJBControlImpl.java:27
8) at
weblogic.knex.context.JwsInternalContext.acquireResources(JwsInternalContext
.java:220) at
weblogic.knex.control.ControlHandler.invoke(ControlHandler.java:260) at
ibas.AccountControl.getTransactionHistory(AccountControl.ctrl) at
ibas.GetSecure.retrieveVisaHistoryTxn(GetSecure.jws:64) </jwErrorDetail>
</detail>
</error>
I have a simple Hello method as well in my WebService (which is also
restricted) and it works fine, but remote EJB access doesn't. I tested my
prototype on Weblogic 7.2 and 8.1 platforms - same result.
Is that a bug or I am missing some additional configuration in order to get
that working. Has anyone seen similar behavior? Is there a known resolution?
Or a suggested way to work around the problem?
Thank you.
Andre

Andre,
It would be best if this issue is handled as an Eval Support case. Please
BEA Customer Support at http://support.beasys.com along with the required
files, and request that an Eval support case be created for this issue.
Thanks
Raj Alagumalai
WebLogic Workshop Support
"Andre Shergin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Anurag,
I removed "t3", still get an error but a different one (Unable to create
InitialContext:null):
<error>
<faultcode>JWSError</faultcode>
<faultstring>Error during JNDI lookup from
jndi://secuser1:[email protected]:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB[Unable to
create InitialContext:null]</faultstring>
<detail>
<jwErrorDetail> weblogic.jws.control.ControlException: Error during JNDI
lookup from
jndi://secuser1:[email protected]:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB[Unable to
create InitialContext:null] at
weblogic.knex.control.EJBControlImpl.acquireResources(EJBControlImpl.java:27
8) at
weblogic.knex.context.JwsInternalContext.acquireResources(JwsInternalContext
.java:220) at
weblogic.knex.control.ControlHandler.invoke(ControlHandler.java:260) at
ibas.AccountControl.getTransactionHistory(AccountControl.ctrl) at
ibas.GetVisaHistoryTransactions.getVisaHistoryTxn(GetVisaHistoryTransactions
.jws:67) </jwErrorDetail>
</detail>
</error>
Note: inter-domain communication is configured properly. The Web Service to
remote EJB works fine without a declarative security.
Any other ideas?
Thank you for your help.
Andre
"Anurag" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Andre,
It seems you are using the URL
jndi:t3://secuser1:[email protected]:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB
whereas you should not be specifying the "t3:" protocol.
The URL should be like
jndi://secuser1:[email protected]:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB
Please do let me know if you see any issues with this.
Note that this will only allow you to access remote EJBs in the same WLS
domain. For accessing EJBs on another domain, you need to configure
inter-domain communication by
following a few simple steps as mentioned at
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/ConsoleHelp/jta.html#1106135. This link has
been provided in the EJB Control Workshop documentation.
Regards,
Anurag
"Andre Shergin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Raj,
I tried that before, it didn't help. I got similar error message:
<error>
<faultcode>JWSError</faultcode>
<faultstring>Error during JNDI lookup from
jndi:t3://secuser1:[email protected]:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB[Lookup
failed for
name:t3://secuser1:[email protected]:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB]</faultstr
ing>
<detail>
<jwErrorDetail> weblogic.jws.control.ControlException: Error during JNDI
lookup from
jndi:t3://secuser1:[email protected]:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB[Lookup
failed for
name:t3://secuser1:[email protected]:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB] at
weblogic.knex.control.EJBControlImpl.acquireResources(EJBControlImpl.java:27
8) at
weblogic.knex.context.JwsInternalContext.acquireResources(JwsInternalContext
.java:220) at
weblogic.knex.control.ControlHandler.invoke(ControlHandler.java:260) at
ibas.AccountControl.getTransactionHistory(AccountControl.ctrl) at
ibas.GetSecure.retrieveVisaHistoryTxn(GetSecure.jws:64) </jwErrorDetail>
</detail>
</error>
Anything else should I try?
P.S. AccountDelegatorEJB, the remote EJB my Web Service calls is NOTaccess
restricted.
I hope there is a solution.
Thanks,
Andre
"Raj Alagumalai" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Andre,
Can you try using the following url with username and password
jndi://username:password@host:7001/my.resource.jndi.object ?
once you add webapp level security, the authenticated is the user who
invokes the EJB.
http://e-docs.bea.com/workshop/docs81/doc/en/workshop/guide/controls/ejb/con
CreatingANewEJBControl.html?skipReload=true
has more info on using remote EJB's.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Raj Alagumalai
WebLogic Workshop Support
"Alla Resnik" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Hello everyone,
I developed a Web Service prototype accessing remote EJB using the EJB
control with special syntax in the jndi-name attribute: @jws:ejb
home-jndi-name="t3://10.10.245.70:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB"
Everything works fine, but I get an error when I restrict access to my
web
service with a declarative security model by implementing steps
provided
in
help doc:
- Define the web resource you wish to protect
- Define which security role is required to access the web resource
- Define which users are granted the required security role
- Configure WebLogic Server security for my web service(Compatibility
Security/Users)
I launch the service by entering the address in a web browser. Whenprompted
to accept the digital certificate, click Yes, when prompted for
network
authentication information, enter username and password, navigate tothe
Test Form tab of Test View, invoke the method by clicking the buttonand
I
get the following exception:
<error>
<faultcode>JWSError</faultcode>
<faultstring>Error during JNDI lookup from
jndi:t3://10.10.245.70:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB[Lookup failed for
name:t3://10.10.245.70:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB]</faultstring>
<detail>
<jwErrorDetail> weblogic.jws.control.ControlException: Error during
JNDI
lookup from jndi:t3://10.10.245.70:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB[Lookupfailed
for name:t3://10.10.245.70:7131/AccountDelegatorEJB] at
weblogic.knex.control.EJBControlImpl.acquireResources(EJBControlImpl.java:27
8) at
weblogic.knex.context.JwsInternalContext.acquireResources(JwsInternalContext
.java:220) at
weblogic.knex.control.ControlHandler.invoke(ControlHandler.java:260)at
ibas.AccountControl.getTransactionHistory(AccountControl.ctrl) at
ibas.GetSecure.retrieveVisaHistoryTxn(GetSecure.jws:64)</jwErrorDetail>
</detail>
</error>
I have a simple Hello method as well in my WebService (which is also
restricted) and it works fine, but remote EJB access doesn't. I testedmy
prototype on Weblogic 7.2 and 8.1 platforms - same result.
Is that a bug or I am missing some additional configuration in order
to
get
that working. Has anyone seen similar behavior? Is there a knownresolution?
Or a suggested way to work around the problem?
Thank you.
Andre

Windows SMTP service - restrictions

Hi
I have installed a SMTP service under IIS 6.0 in windows 2008 R2
I would like to know if is possible to restrict the SMPT traffic to specific domains
Example: i only want that only relay traffic to google.com
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Please refer to Don's suggestion in following thread and check if can help you.
restrict destination domain on SMTP service
In addition, for your current issue, I suggest that you should post it in
IIS forum. I believe we will get a better assistance there.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Justin Gu
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

BES vs BES/BIS Service - Restrictions?

Hi
I have a BB Curve 8900 and I have BIS service on it. I have friends and colleagues who have BES service on their BB Bold 9700. Company IT Policy restricts them from adding me on their BBM. They receive my invite and accept it but it goes into the void. I am also able to send them PIN msgs and they receive it but they can not reply to them.
My service provider provides a service called BES/BIS where both BES and BIS are provided. I have taken this now and still have the same problem as before. My question is, if my friends subscription is changed to BES/BIS will that allow them to communicate with me on the BBM through the BIS?
Thanks.

Hi and Welcome to the Forums!
Nope. The level of data plan that one has only defines the level of services that can be made available. With BES, if an IT Policy restricts some of those services (e.g., BBM and PIN messaging), then those services are simply not available on that BB. So, changing plans will have no effect on this service being blocked by the IT Policy for as long as that IT Policy exists on the BB.
Good luck!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Service Restricted for Non-Payment of Paid Bill

I can't believe having paid/cleared a bill online 6th June, how my service could be restricted 21st June ofr non-payment. That's ridiculous! To make matters worse, you have to wait 24hrs to get service back.
Laynet

Hi
I am sorry to see you are having problems
I suggest you contact live chat at this link they should be able to help you
http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact/c/2902/?s_intcid=con_intban_sanda_contact_us_chat_from_forums
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Web Services - restriction

Hi,
I have developed a web service and deployed it in standalone Oracle oc4j server and i published the web service to UDDI registry.
We given the access to all users to view the registry. But we want to restrict who are all implementing our web service. So in future, if we change the service we can notify them.
rgds,
Bala Murali

We given the access to all users to view the registry. But we want to restrict who are all implementing our web service. So in future, if we change the service we can notify them.
rgds,
Bala Murali It'd be helpful if you could clarify your requirement. Do you want want to restrict the users who can implement your web service, i.e., restricting access to the service interface specification (such as <wsdl:binding> of a WSDL)? Or do you want to restrict users to access the web services you implemented?
- sam

Generic Object Services - restrict toolbar functions?

Hello,
When I create a URL link to an object, there is always a 'delete' button in the toolbar of the attachment list. Apparently, there are no authorization checks being made and everyone can delete this link.
Is it possible to remove this button from the toolbar? Or at least making sure that not everyone can delete the link?
Thanks!

Hi,
I think you are using CL_GOS* class for this. then
module call_gos_attachment output.
"<< I have created a authorisation object and
" and called here if user have only display or change
" access then the ip_mode will get value passed
" accordingly
if ( sy-tcode eq c_yars2 or sy-tcode eq c_yars3 ).
      i_borident-objtype = 'YARS_ATTA'.
      i_borident-objkey = yarshdr-docno.
      create object gos_manager
        exporting
           is_object            = i_borident
           it_service_selection = i_services
           ip_no_commit         = ' '
        exceptions
           object_invalid       = 1.
    else.                                " Display Mode
      i_borident-objtype = 'YARS_ATTA'.
      i_borident-objkey = yarshdr-docno.
      create object gos_manager
        exporting
           is_object            = i_borident
           it_service_selection = i_services
           ip_mode              = 'D'      "<<<<<< Check for display mode
        exceptions
           object_invalid       = 1.
    endif.
endmodule.                               " Call_gos_attachment Output
or if this suit your need then
    create object gos_view
      exporting
        ip_mode = 'D'.                     " <<<<Display Mode
* Start GOS Service for attachement view
    i_viewobj-objtype = 'YARS_ATTA'.
    i_viewobj-objkey = yarshdr-docno.
    call method gos_view->start_service_direct
      exporting
        ip_service = 'VIEW_ATTA'
        is_object = i_viewobj.
This i have done it for one of the custom Generic object, i think this one will help you out.
a®

Generic Object Services restrict user access

Hi
I have the following scenario, could anyone offer any pointers as to how to achieve a solution.
I have two groups of people, A and B, my requirement is to only allow group A to access/delete documents that have been created by users in group A, and for Group B to only have access to attachments created by users in group B.
An in addition to Ideally have two content repositories one for A and one for B
Thanks
John

Hi John,
            Please adjust role with S_OC_ROLE and S_GOS_ATT.
          1) If a user has a role with S_OC_ROLE with *, then he will be able to delete the attachements made by any othe user, then in this case S_GOS_ATT will not be checked.
           2) If a user has a role with S_OC_ROLE with " ", then he will be NOT able to delete the attachements made by any othe user, unless S_GOS_ATT is assigned.
Thanks,
CB

After 04 months of purchase of iphone 5 the lock button is too hard. At times its not working at all. The phone has been purchased in USA now I'm not getting service in India. After all whats the point in spending so much amount without any service.

After 04 months of purchase of iphone 5 the lock button is too hard. At times its not working at all. The phone has been purchased in USA now I'm not getting service in India. After all whats the point in spending so much amount without any service.

The warranty says that Apple may restrict service of an iPhone to the country of sale, and any reliable salesperson will tell you that if you tell them that you plan to use the iPhone in another country. Such service restrictions are common with cellphones and are by no means limited to Apple's phones.
Sorry, but if your iPhone requires service, you will need to send it to someone you know in the US who can get it serviced and then send it back to you.
Regards.

Why are we paying over $300 a month for a family plan that doesn't include call blocking or decent voicemail services?

I am a member of a shared family plan which as I see it posted our bill is over $300 a month, which does not include unlimited data, family protection (which allows you to permanently block numbers vs there 30 or 90 day limit if you are not covered) <---- this requires you to constantly be on alert of something so ridiculous that it shouldn't be concerned with, and finally they do not offer an upgraded voicemail service. So my voicemail asks me to enter pin than right to messages. It does not tell me the following: The date the call was made, the time the call was made, nor any other pertinent information regarding the call aside from the number and than the message. It's frustrating because I miss a lot of calls these days due to volume controls and silent modes and ring tones that aren't loud enough that I need to know when calls are received. I don't ever remember having to pay for an upgraded voicemail service, that's like hiring a firm to handle all my incoming calls. I want my answering machine back. I have many other issues to include Verizon's online chat service which has at least one major issue. I won't bring that up here. The question is how much more money can they get for a simple cell phone plan? For christ's sake.
Message was edited by: NoMoreOriginalNames Grammar corrections

The free voicemail is basic which gives you the date and time of the message. If you want more you should pay for more. Also, some Android phones with KitKat have free Visual Voicemail.
Thank you for your feedback, but my phone gives me no choice and it most certainly does not state the date and time that the message was received. The only way for me to know that is if I happen to check exactly the phone log around the same time that the message was left, else it is buried underneath other more recent and answered calls. And seriously man, the whole pay more idea is getting a bit far-fetched. There is no reason why I should be able to buy a portable mini answering machine for a one time payment of $14.99 with a reusable blank tape, they don't have these and we'd look ridiculous carrying them around with everything else, but the point is we are giving permission to charge for some ridiculous things that should not be paid more for. My old answering machine worked just fine, and more importantly I have never paid for an "upgraded" voicemail service. As I mentioned if I want that I can hire a service to do that, but I don't need that. I hope you can understand my growing concerns. We pay for every little in-app purchase, we are being programmed to pay for everything that should already be includedfdasf in an initial price, brought home and enjoyed for its duration. Instead wesdfsdf are paying monthly fees and dues on objects that aren't covered by warranties or insurances which eventually break and leave people struggling to pick up the pieces. These are serious issues because people now rely so much on their phones (of course this is all my opinion) that we've become depandent on them. Anyway, thanks, appreciate all the feedback.
As for blocking this is what it states on my plan under the blocking feature tab:
You can block calls and message from up to 5 phone numbers at no charge.
Expiration. Blocks expire after 90 days. Be sure to reapply the block if you wish to continue the service restriction. To permanently block numbers, subscribe to FamilyBase*.
Limitations.
You cannot block numbers within your account or non-10 digit numbers such as 911,411 or #MIN (checks minutes used).
Apple® iMessage® won't be blocked. Messages from this service can be blocked by disabling the iMessage feature from within the Settings>Messages menu of your Apple device.
Unblocking. To unblock a number, highlight and delete the number, then click "Submit".
So there's the limits, but even worst is they don't include a simple field where I can put the name of the individual I am blocking. So when it comes time to maybe rotate one out (this should be an unlimited number), one of the many 5 I can choose to block, I might not remember who is who or what is what. I have a lot of responsibilities in my life, this is not one that should be pushed on the consumer. It's ridiculous.

How do you set location based reminders with location restrictions turned on?

I can set location based reminders with location restrictions turned off, but I want them on. Otherwise if I lost or if somebody stole my iPhone they could just turn off the find my iPhone function. Yet if I have location services restricted to prevent this then location based reminders are unavailable. Any help would be appreciated

I can set location based reminders with location restrictions turned off, but I want them on. Otherwise if I lost or if somebody stole my iPhone they could just turn off the find my iPhone function. Yet if I have location services restricted to prevent this then location based reminders are unavailable. Any help would be appreciated

FIM Service and Portal Installation Ends Prematurely

Hello All,
I'm in the process of setting up a new production FIM 2010 R2 server. I have already installed the FIM synchronization service and I was able to install this successfully.
I have already installed SharePoint services (WSS 3.0) and configured it for FIM. But when I try to install the FIM Service and Portal.
I keep getting and error that says " FIM Service and Portal Installation Ends Prematurely" with no other details. If anybody has any advice please let me know.
I have already installed everything on a stand alone box in a dev environment and it all works correctly however I am unable to now install in a production environment

Cameron is right - you should consider FIMService account nearly as normal AD account for user*
An installer account should be admin on the box, where you are installing FIMService and he should be sysadmin on SQL during installation of FIMService. An installer account should be other than FIMService account itself.
*FIMService account:
Lock down the Service Account
The service account should not be used by any other services or users. The account must not be used to logon interactively and requires no access to any additional resources beyond those granted during setup. The service account is used to provide the security
context for the MIIS service as it accesses resources on the MIIS server and the associated database. It also provides the security context for the execution of any rules extensions.
Lock down the service account to ensure no malicious user is able to sign in using its credentials and gain access to MIIS data. Configure Group Policies to lock down the account and restrict access to this account. Since the MIIS service only needs the account
to run as a service, restrict the account as follows:
Deny logon as a batch job.
Deny logon locally.
Deny logon through Terminal Services.
Deny access to this computer from the network.
If you found my post helpful, please give it a Helpful vote. If it answered your question, remember to mark it as an Answer.
Good topic for a Wiki article:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/23330.technet-guru-contributions-for-march.aspx
Thanks Dominic and Jose!
Ed Price, Power BI & SQL Server Customer Program Manager (Blog,
Small Basic,
Wiki Ninjas,
Wiki)
Answer an interesting question?
Create a wiki article about it!

HT1975 iphone 4S: Why are my location service settings greyed out?

I can find my location settings on my iPhone 4S, but both overall and settings for particular apps are greyed out. I need to turn location services on for a particular app to work. Can anyone help me?

Are some location services restricted?
Check Settings > General > Restrictions

Iphone 4s "No Service" following recent unlock

Hi there,
I have just obatined a second hand Iphone 4s and wish to use it with my Vodafone SIM. The Iphone was with O2 but I have had this unlocked by the network and completed the correct procedure (connecting to Itunes, restoring Iphone etc) but I'm still having issues with a constant "No Service" restricting my ability to make/receive anything whatsoever. Does anyone have any recomendations to resolve such error (further setting changes etc) or does this sound like a SIM error?
Many Thanks!

Hey ronniet08!
Here is an article that will help you troubleshoot this issue with your iPhone:
iPhone: Troubleshooting No Service
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts4429
Take care, and thanks for visiting the Apple Support Communities.
-Braden

Service restricted

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for