Set the values less than the value prompted

Hi Every one,
I have a requirement where the report will be navigating to other report.
example: I have a report A and when I click on the any value in date column it navigate to other report by filtering the data by the date we clicked to navigate.
Here my question is, it is filtering the navigated report by the date we selected. but I want it filter the dates equal to or less than the date we selected
like if I click on date 11/7/2011 it should navigate to the report B and in report B the data should show data for the dates equal to or less than 11/7/2011
is there any way to set this. because i can see only is prompted that we set for this requirement.
Thanks in Advance.
Edited by: 861096 on Nov 11, 2011 9:01 AM

Hi ,
While creating the prompt give the presentation varible.
So when you will select the value for the Report A say ex :11/7/2011 it will be catched by the presentation variable.
In your second report use this presentation variable as a filter condition where date < = presentation variable.
It will work for you .
Thanks,
Ananth

Similar Messages

  • Limit the no of segments per IDOC to less than the current default value

    Hi friends,
    please help me in the following issue.
    The possibility to limit the number
    of segments per IDOC to less than the current default value.
    Purpose is to limit the traffic of IDOCs between systems.
    How to solve this issue to avoid traffic
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Sandeep

    Hi Kiran,
    Actually we are using standard ones at that time we are getting prolems. When using custom developed ALE's
    we are putting segment size is less.To decrease segment size is there any filtering at the sender side? To change segment size may be nedd to take help form SAP.
    But if have filtering at any level from sender side need to confirm before consult SAP.
    Regards
    Sandeep

  • On and iPad how to Allow User To Enter Custom Text  (Dropdown only) Enables users to enter a value other than the ones in the list.

    On an iPad, how do I :
    Allow User To Enter Custom Text
    (Dropdown only) Enables users to enter a value other than the ones in the list.'?

    Are you using the built-in Currency option under the Format tab? If so,
    what you're describing should not happen.

  • Invoice created with value highier than the PO value

    Hello,
    I would like to know what should happen if an Invoice is created in the R/3 backend with a value higher than the PO value.
    Regards,
    Lina

    Hi
    <u>"If you do not define any tolerances, this means that it is not possible to enter a delivery/incoming invoice in EBP where quantity or value has been exceeded" So, this works different in SRM, that we do in R/3.</u>
    <b>Please go through the following links / SAP OSS Notes -></b>
    Note 835073 Enhancement of the tolerance checks
    Note 496901 Tolerance check - back-end service PO with/without limit
    Re: GR tolerance problem
    Tolerance Check for Price Variance is not working
    Re: Tolerance in SRM and ECC (BE R/3)
    Re: Tolerance Groups
    SRM: many confirmation for PO
    Re: MM-SUS Scenario---Error in R/3 IDOC when i change the Quantity in SUS
    TOG parameter and tolerance checks better understanding
    <b>Hope this will definitely help.</b>
    Do let me know, incase you need any other details.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • "Reversal value greater than the  value invoiced to date" error

    Hi all,
    I have a scenario.  there is a invoice which we tried to reverse through MR8M. But it was not successful. Now , as a alternative solution I am trying to book credit memo. There were two line items in the PO.  When I try to book Credit memo, the system throws error "Reversal value greater than the  value invoiced to date" only for line item 2. Line item 1 is perfectly OK. Any suggestions why this is happening ? If it would have been exchange rate problem then I think the error should be for both the line items.
    Regards,
    Vivek

    Hi,
    You told that youtr PO is having two line utems and you are trying to post the credit memeo for the two line items.
    Does your po is invoiced for the two line items ?
    if the second line item is not posted with any invoice , while posting credit memo to second line item system will give this error.This is one scenario.
    May be you would have wrongly entered the values ?
    There could have been already reversed or posted the credit memo for then second line item .
    check whather you are posting any subsequent posting ?
    Regards,

  • How to get the actual value rather than pixel value in vision assistant

    how to get the actual value rather than pixel value by vision assistant in my program.As shown in the figure            this is my programme   this is the result       But i want to get this result

    Check the documentation for the "ADF Dialog Framework"
    It may help
    Atilio

  • PO is getting released even if the total amount is less than the last PO am

    Purchase Order is getting released even if the total amount is less than the last PO amount. The release strategy is only working for the first Purchase Order and if the PO amount is greater than the last PO amount.
    Please let me know how to correct this scenario (release strategy).
    Regards,
    Prishu

    Hi,
    Release strategy has nothing do with the previous PO amount. May be, Co-incidently the amount in previous PO which you are referring and the characteristics value maintained in the release strategy is same.
    1) Please go in release strategy by the path mentioned below
    IMG u2013 Material Management u2013 Purchasing u2013 Purchase Requisition u2013 Release Procedure u2013 Procedure with Classification u2013 Set Up Procedure with Classification
    2) Then go to release strategy. Here the total available release strategies would be displayed. Double click the strategy which is getting reflected in the PO you want and go the classifiction tab. There you will get the PO value. Based on this characteristic value the respective release streategy gets refelected.
    I hope this clarifies.
    Regards
    sachin

  • How order got transmitted even if quantity is less than the minimum

    Hi All,
    We have an issue where an order has been transmitted for 23 cases where minimum is 25. This order came through even if this order is for that part of the region that should not be able to tranmit orders if under min..
    Being a technical guy, I am not able to understand the issue itself.
    Doubts :
    1. How an order is supposed to be transmitted ?
    2. What is this minimum below which an order should not be transmitted? Where this minimum value is defined ? Is it specific to customer or specific to area or specific to plant?
    In which table or through T-Code I can check this minimum ....
    Can you please guide how to explore the above....
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Sanjeet

    Hi Sanjeet
    You can maintain "Minimum order quantity" in the Material master data.
    Go to change mode of material master (MM02), enter your material number, click enter, select the "Sale org 1" tab and continue.
    Now, in the "Sales org 1" tab , scrolled down and you will find a field "Minimum order quantity" as you required, save it.
    Suppose, you have entered ,minimum order quantity as 10 pcs.
    If you create an order for that item and if the quantity is below 10 pieces then system will give you "warning message". This is normal standard setting.
    If you want that system should give "Error message" instead of "Warning message" , then go to transaction code "OVAH".
    For combination "V4" and "082", change the sytem message to "E" (normally you will find here W).
    NOW, SYSTEM WILL GIVE YOU ERROR MESSAGE IF YOU ENTER , in the Sale order, order quantity which is  less than the minimum order quantity as specified in the material master data.

  • Partitioning (range) a table values less than 'A'

    i am referring
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96524/c12parti.htm
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/partconc.htm
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    "CORE     10.2.0.1.0     Production"
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    create table drop_it as select * from mv_prod_search_det2;     
    CREATE TABLE DROP_IT_P(
    PROD_DETAILS VARCHAR2(1000 BYTE),
         SIGN VARCHAR2(42 BYTE)
    PARTITION BY RANGE(PROD_DETAILS)
    PARTITION MAX_VALUE VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
    update drop_it set prod_details=upper(prod_details);     
    72000 rows updated
    ALTER TABLE drop_it_p EXCHANGE PARTITION MAX_VALUE WITH TABLE drop_it WITH VALIDATION;     
    select * from mv_prod_search_det2
    72000 rows selected
    exec dbms_stats.gather_database_stats;
    select * from drop_it_p partition(max_value)
    ALTER TABLE DROP_IT_P
      SPLIT PARTITION MAX_VALUE AT ('B%')
      INTO (PARTITION p_a,
            PARTITION MAX_VALUE);     
    select * from drop_it_p partition(p_a);
    6785 rows selected
    select * from drop_it_p partition(p_a) where prod_details not like 'A%'     
    696 rows selectedit even shows me values that start with W,V,I,1,2,3,4,24,5 etc
    although the number is less(696out of 6785) this is undesired
    please help me eliminate these rows
    thank you
    this thread is related to tuning regexp_like by author 946207
    please refer
    tuning regexp_like
    and partitioning a table by 946207
    Edited by: 946207 on Dec 2, 2012 1:52 AM
    Edited by: 946207 on Dec 2, 2012 11:02 PM

    First, when you post related threads you should cross-link them so people have access to all of the information about the problem you are trying to work with.
    partitioning a table
    >
    it even shows me values that start with W,V,I,1,2,3,4,24,5 etc
    although the number is less(696out of 6785) this is undesired
    >
    Yes - that is what it should be doing.
    These are the steps you took to populate the table
    1. You originally inserted ALL data into table 'drop_it' with no restriction on the PROD_DETAILS values.
    create table drop_it as select * from mv_prod_search_det2;     2. Then you converted the PROD_DETAILS value to upper case. That has no effect on numbers or other non-alphabetic characters.
    update drop_it set prod_details=upper(prod_details);3. Then you create a new table with only one partition using MAXVALUe
    PROD_DETAILS VARCHAR2(1000 BYTE),
         SIGN VARCHAR2(42 BYTE)
    PARTITION BY RANGE(PROD_DETAILS)
    PARTITION MAX_VALUE VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
    );4. Then you populate the partitioned table by exchange. It now has the same data including the numeric data.
    ALTER TABLE drop_it_p EXCHANGE PARTITION MAX_VALUE WITH TABLE drop_it WITH VALIDATION;     5. Then you split the one MAXVALUE partition into two partitions. One with data < 'B%' and one with the remaining data that sorts higher based on your character set.
    ALTER TABLE DROP_IT_P
      SPLIT PARTITION MAX_VALUE AT ('B%')
      INTO (PARTITION p_a,
            PARTITION MAX_VALUE);     The split on 'B%' when creating partition p_a is equivalent to you 'WITH VALUES < 'B%'. Since PROD_DETAILS is a VARCHAR2 datatype that 'LESS THAN' comparison uses the character order based on your database character set and most, if not all, character sets have characters that sort lower than the uppercase alphabetic characters.
    For example in the ASCII character set an uppercase 'A' is decimal 65 so 64 other characters (including the digitis 0-9) sort lower than 'A'.
    http://www.asciitable.com/
    As the doc you cited shows
    >
    •All partitions, except the first, have an implicit lower bound specified by the VALUES LESS THAN clause on the previous partition.
    >
    That 'first' partition has no lower bound so ALL data, including digits, that sort less than 'B%' will be in that partition.
    >
    please help me eliminate these rows
    >
    Either don't select the data to begin with or remove it using a simple DELETE query. Also you can do the case conversion when you select the data.
    create table drop_it as select upper(prod_details) prod_details, sign from mv_prod_search_det2 where upper(prod_details >= 'A';Before you do that you should make sure you define the actual business rule you want to use to define the data you really want to keep and exclude.
    Because most, if not all, character sets also have characters that sort HIGHER than the alphabetic characters. That ASCII table shows five of them. If you don't filter them out you will get data where the values start with those characters.
    Even if you do filter them out there is nothing in what you posted that would prevent a user from inserting that data back into the table.
    And, of course, there are characters that sort BETWEEN the lower and upper case alphabetics.
    You need to determine what the allowable characters are in the PROD_DETAILS column and add code (e.g. check constraint or trigger) to make sure users can't enter data that includes those characters.

  • Problem with the operator less than or equal to in a weby query

    Hi all.
    The universe is a OLAP Universe
    When i created a query in webi and put the month in the filter area with the operator less than or equal to like this.
    Month (less than or equal to) 2010.01 for example. The all result brings also the all values like 2010.02, 2010.03, etc
    What is the problem and how can fix that ?
    Thanks

    Looks like you are using a less than or equal to with a Sting data type.
    I think you should change to your filter to Year <= 2010 And Month <= 1. Hope you have a month and year object in you BeX.
    Anil

  • Store value less than current week and year.

    Hi All,
    I have a table called BACKLOG whose structure is like this
    ITEM_NUMBER   YEAR_WEEK   MS
    1N58          2012-WK02   01/15/2012
    1N58          2011-WK02   01/15/2011current from my procedure i am storing the value in my new table which is less than current week. But i want to store the value less than current week and current year. Please help me to get how i can do this.
    PROCEDURE BACKLOG_PROC_LT_CW IS
      BEGIN
    DELETE BACKLOG_LT_CW;
    COMMIT;
          INSERT INTO BACKLOG_LT_CW
            SELECT
                  DC_UTIL.GEN_YEAR_WEEK(MS) YEAR_WEEK,
                  ITEM_NUMBER,
                  MSD
                  FROM BACKLOG
              where to_char(MS, 'IW')<to_char(sysdate, 'IW');
      END BACKLOG_PROC_LT_CW;Currently with the above procedure code both the value is storing in my BACKLOG_LT_CW table but if you see the data of BACKLOG table you will find YEAR_WEEk 2012-WK02 falls in next year but still it is storing in my table because i have taken IW only. Please help me to get the soln
    Thanks in advance
    Regards

    Are you looking for this?
    where to_char(MS, 'YYYYIW')<to_char(sysdate, 'YYYYIW');

  • Net value less than COGS

    Hi Gurus
    Please let me know, if there is anyway apart from using an exit, where we can get an alert if the net value of the order is less than the VPRS
    Anurag

    Dear Friend
    This can be achieved in standard itself
    For VPRS condition type maintain subtotal as B and requirement 4 and alternate calculation type as 5 in your pricing procedure and with these settings if nett value is less than VPRS then a warning message will come and even if you save it will tell that that the document is incomplete and you may not be able to create the delivery etc
    This should satisfy your requirement
    If you look at the standard pricing procedure RVAA01 in that VPRS comes with subtotal as B and requirement 4 and we have to add alternate calculation type as 5 to get our requirement in that
    Regards
    Raja

  • Header qty is less than the operation qty.

    To certain production order header qty is less than the operation qty. Please advise me.

    Dear,
    Base Quantity - Quantity of the material to be produced to which the standard values of the operation refer.
    Operation Quantity - Quantity planned for this operation.
    Base quantity and operation quantity may not always be the same, if we have partial lots delivered during the sequence of operations, the operation quantity will be equal to the lot delivered during the operation.
    Base quantity is dependent on the BOM, where it signifies the total quantity of output after using the components of certain quantity.
    In routing, you neeed maintained there operation quantity, and unit of measure of operation quantity accordingly with base quantity unit of measure.
    Check up the Processing formula used in the Scheduling tab of Work center (Use SAP002 = Machine * Oprn qty / Base qty / No. of splits)
    Hope clear to you.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar
    Edited by: R Brahmankar on Oct 7, 2008 11:37 AM

  • Condition for excluding Sales value less than or equal to 0

    Hello Experts,
    I have to create condition in the query designer to exclude Sales Value <=0, and that should be applied to all the column values and result values when we put active.
    Can anyone help ?
    Thanks in advance,
    Venky
    Duplicate Post
    Condition for excluding Sales value less than or equal to 0
    Edited by: Arun Varadarajan on Apr 13, 2010 8:57 PM

    Hello Naveen,
    Thanks for quick reply. I have created condition greater than zero and executed report, i can able to eliminate rows with sales value <=0, but we have other columns in the report say Quantity, Backlog... when we run the report without condition the values which showed are same when we put it in active aslo.
    After eliminating few rows which having some quantity value, that value should be deducted from the result of the quantity. I tried with applying apply to results opton, then also there is no change in the result value of the quantity.
    Our requirement is to apply condition to eliminate rows which are sales value <=0 and same the result values of the columns should effect.
    Is it possible in anyway, if yes please specify solution.
    Thanks,
    Venky

  • Total budget 0.00 EUR in order 12412100 is less than the cumulative bud

    Dear  Sir,
    In t.code KO22 it gives error while saving amount in original budget field for 2008,
    "The total budget 0.00 EUR in order 15210080 is less than the cumulative budget 2.16 EUR.
    The cumulative budget is the total of the annual budgets."
    Can you pls guide.
    Thanks
    Edited by: Mukherjee S on Mar 31, 2008 1:47 PM

    You might have distirbuted the values  (2.16 EUR) over years. In this case you need to enter the value in Overall Budget also.
    Regards
    Sreenivas

Maybe you are looking for