Setting ECHO ON takes more time?
Hi all,
Recently, we had to run a huge file with INSERTs in production database. But before that when the same file was run in testing database, we set the ECHO on in SQL*PLUS and it took more time, I mean, the difference was huge, in fact. I wish to know if setting ECHO to ON takes more time than setting ECHO to OFF. Does this have an effect on time it takes to make the INSERTs.
Regards,
...
Yingkuan,
Thanks for the reply. In fact, I know the function what ECHO does. Now suppose I have 121,000 lines of INSERT statements in a file called "inserts.sql" and I am going to execute it in SQL*PLUS to a remote server, the server being 9.2.0.8.0. Will there be a time difference in completing the scripts if I set the ECHO to ON and if I set the ECHO to OFF. Consider the following scenario:
Scenario 1
========
SQL> SET ECHO ON;
SQL> @inserts.sql;
Elapsed: 02:00:00.00
Scenario 2
========
SQL> SET ECHO OFF;
SQL> @inserts.sql;
Elapsed: 01:00:00.00
Please note the "Elapsed" time between the 2 scenarios. Will the ECHO setting impact the elapsed time? I think this setting will not cause the file to take long time to complete as it is just a client side setting. Please clarify.
Regards,
...
Similar Messages
-
Query Takes more Time when i execute from the Instant client.
Hi,
Currently in our Env we have some Queries takes more time when we run from the Instant Client.
System Details
OS=Solaris 10 x86 64bit
Oracle 10.2.0.4
Client Side
$ sqlplus trd_trd_ro/trd_trd_ro@prdba001/TRADE1
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.2.0 - Production on Mon Aug 9 16:26:25 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
SQL> set timing on
SQL> select mod(lastinstmessagesequence, 1000000000) LastInstIDSeqNo from tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias='2221';
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:01:54.19
SQL> Disconnected from Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - ProductionSame Query running on Server Side
^C130-oracle@prdba001 txt: sql
Database: trd_trd_owner/trd_trd_owner@prdba001/TRADE1
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Mon Aug 9 17:15:18 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
trd_trd_owner@TRADE1> set timing on
trd_trd_owner@TRADE1> select mod(lastinstmessagesequence, 1000000000) LastInstIDSeqNo from tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias='2221';
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:00:00.12
trd_trd_owner@TRADE1> exitKindly help me what could be the Issues.Hi Charles,
Thanks for your Quick response.I pulled the info.
sys@TRADE1> SELECT * FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR('bpxr7axhxaqvy',NULL,'ALLSTATS LAST'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID bpxr7axhxaqvy, child number 0
select /*+ GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS */ mod(lastinstmessagesequence, :"SYS_B_0") LastInstIDSeqNo from
tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias=:"SYS_B_1"
Plan hash value: 1955857846
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.06 | 6121 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 1 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.06 | 6121 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | 1 | | 0 |00:00:00.06 | 6121 |
| 4 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.05 | 3073 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_QUOTE | 1 | 30080 | 0 |00:00:00.05 | 3073 |
| 6 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TIBEX_ORDER | 1 | 971 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TIBEX_ORDER_IDX_OLT | 1 | 971 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 9 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_TSTRADE | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 11 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_IOIREQUEST | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 13 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BESTEXREL | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 |
| 15 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 2862 |
|* 16 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | SYS_C0058325 | 1 | 339 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 2862 |
| 17 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 |
|* 18 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_EDPPULLORDERS | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 |
| 19 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058803 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 21 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057785 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 23 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 24 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057827 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 25 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_DELETEADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 27 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 28 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058148 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 29 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 30 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058264 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 31 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 32 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058516 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 33 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 34 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058561 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 35 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 36 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058783 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 37 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 38 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058977 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 39 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 40 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058859 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 41 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 42 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0059197 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 43 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 44 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_CANCELTRDADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 45 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 46 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BULKCANCELADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
5 - filter("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
8 - access("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
10 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
12 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
14 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
16 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
18 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
20 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
22 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
24 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
26 - filter(("USERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
28 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
30 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
32 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
34 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
36 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
38 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
40 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
42 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
44 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
46 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
SQL_ID bpxr7axhxaqvy, child number 1
select /*+ GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS */ mod(lastinstmessagesequence, :"SYS_B_0") LastInstIDSeqNo from
tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias=:"SYS_B_1"
Plan hash value: 1955857846
Plan hash value: 1955857846
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.12 | 8545 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 1 | 21 | 0 |00:00:00.12 | 8545 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | 1 | | 0 |00:00:00.12 | 8545 |
| 4 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.10 | 5496 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_QUOTE | 1 | 21056 | 0 |00:00:00.10 | 5496 |
| 6 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 4 |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TIBEX_ORDER | 1 | 660 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 4 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TIBEX_ORDER_IDX_OLT | 1 | 660 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 4 |
| 9 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_TSTRADE | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 11 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_IOIREQUEST | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 13 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BESTEXREL | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 |
| 15 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.02 | 2862 |
|* 16 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | SYS_C0058325 | 1 | 339 | 0 |00:00:00.02 | 2862 |
| 17 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 |
|* 18 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_EDPPULLORDERS | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 |
| 19 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058803 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 21 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057785 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 23 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 24 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057827 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 25 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_DELETEADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 27 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 28 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058148 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 29 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 30 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058264 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 31 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 32 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058516 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 33 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 34 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058561 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 35 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 36 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058783 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 37 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 38 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058977 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 39 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 40 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058859 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 41 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
|* 42 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0059197 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 |
| 43 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 44 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_CANCELTRDADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
| 45 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
|* 46 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BULKCANCELADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - filter("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
8 - access("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
10 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
12 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
14 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
16 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
18 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
20 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
22 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
24 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
26 - filter(("USERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
28 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
30 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
32 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
34 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
36 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
38 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
40 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
42 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
44 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
46 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
SQL_ID bpxr7axhxaqvy, child number 2
select /*+ GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS */ mod(lastinstmessagesequence, :"SYS_B_0") LastInstIDSeqNo from
tibex_msgseqbyuseralias where useralias=:"SYS_B_1"
Plan hash value: 1955857846
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | Reads |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 21 | 1 |00:00:00.13 | 8476 | 3 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 1 | 21 | 1 |00:00:00.13 | 8476 | 3 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | 1 | | 1 |00:00:00.13 | 8476 | 3 |
| 4 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.10 | 5283 | 0 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_QUOTE | 1 | 21056 | 0 |00:00:00.10 | 5283 | 0 |
| 6 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 1 |00:00:00.01 | 148 | 3 |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TIBEX_ORDER | 1 | 660 | 150 |00:00:00.01 | 148 | 3 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TIBEX_ORDER_IDX_OLT | 1 | 660 | 150 |00:00:00.01 | 5 | 0 |
| 9 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_TSTRADE | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 11 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_IOIREQUEST | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 13 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 | 0 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BESTEXREL | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 126 | 0 |
| 15 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.02 | 2862 | 0 |
|* 16 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | SYS_C0058325 | 1 | 339 | 0 |00:00:00.02 | 2862 | 0 |
| 17 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 | 0 |
|* 18 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_EDPPULLORDERS | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 31 | 0 |
| 19 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058803 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 21 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057785 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 23 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 24 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0057827 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 25 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_DELETEADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 27 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 28 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058148 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 29 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 30 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058264 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 31 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 32 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058516 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 33 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 34 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058561 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 35 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 36 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058783 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 37 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 38 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058977 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 39 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 40 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0058859 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 41 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
|* 42 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C0059197 | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 1 | 0 |
| 43 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 44 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_CANCELTRDADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 45 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT | | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
|* 46 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TIBEX_BULKCANCELADMIN | 1 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - filter("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
8 - access("LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
10 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
12 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
14 - filter(("LASTINSTUSERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "LASTINSTUSERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
16 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
18 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
20 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
22 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
24 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
26 - filter(("USERALIAS" IS NOT NULL AND "USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1))
28 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
30 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
32 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
34 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
36 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
38 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
40 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
42 - access("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
44 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
46 - filter("USERALIAS"=:SYS_B_1)
249 rows selected. -
Bind variable code takes more time to complete?
Hello, My database is oracle11g.
I have same plsql code and first one is without bind variable and second one is with bind variable. Usually, bind variable should take less time. But here
the bind variable takes more time than the regular code... Can any one please explain why?
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;
System altered.
SQL> declare
2 cursor c1 is select * from emp where rownum < 50;
3 l_start NUMBER DEFAULT DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME;
4 v_cnt number;
5 begin
6 for i in c1 loop
7 SELECT count(*) into v_cnt
8 FROM rate
9 WHERE rate_id IN (SELECT rate_id
10 FROM ratedetail
11 WHERE benefit_id = i.benefit_id)
12 AND effective_date =
13 TO_DATE ('2011-01-23 00:00:00', 'yyyy-MM-dd HH24:MI:SS')
14 AND rate_type_id = 1;
15 end loop;
16 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('total minutes....'||ROUND(ROUND((DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME - l_start)/100, 2)
/60,3));
17 end;
18 /
total minutes.....06
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> alter system flush shared_pool;
System altered.
SQL>
SQL> declare
2 cursor c1 is select benefit_id from emp where rownum < 50;
3 l_start NUMBER DEFAULT DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME;
4 v_cnt number;
5 begin
6 for i in c1 loop
7 execute immediate 'SELECT count(*)
8 FROM rate
9 WHERE rate_id IN (SELECT rate_id
10 FROM ratedetail
11 WHERE benefit_id = :x)
12 AND effective_date = trunc(sysdate)-202
13 AND rate_type_id = 1'
14 into v_cnt using i.benefit_id;
15 end loop;
16 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('total minutes....'||ROUND(ROUND((DBMS_UTILITY.GET_TIME - l_start)/100, 2)
/60,3));
17 end;
18 /
total minutes.....061
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>Shrinika wrote:
Thanks for the clarification.. Now i understand...
One final question on this thread before i close this thread....
My database is set to CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE for some reason. It seems somebody applied a "quick and dirty fix" to "database is slow" problem. BAD PRACTICE
My question is, when we use bind variable, does it parse the sql code every time? or does it reuse the execution plan?
In my database, it reuse the execution plan... Just checking... When we set CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE, it should generate the execution plan
for every unqiue sql code... Is that correct? Am i confusing?If by "parse" you mean a "hard parse" (which generates execution plan), then the answer is NO. As you observed, it reuses execution plan.
For e.g. with CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE setting, following SQLs
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = 10 ;and
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = 20 ;would tend to reuse the same execution plan since both of these will be rewritten by oracle (before execution) as
select employee_no, first_name, last_name from employees where dept_no = :SYS01 ;Hope this helps.
Edited by: user503699 on Aug 14, 2010 3:55 AM -
Oracle coherence first read/write operation take more time
I'm currently testing with oracle coherence Java and C++ version and from both versions for writing to any local or distributed or near cache first read/write operation take more time compared to next consecutive read/write operation. Is this because of boost operations happening inside actual HashMap or serialization or memory mapped implementation. What are the techniques which we can use to improve the performance with this first read/write operation?
Currently I'm doing a single read/write operation after fetching the NamedCache Instance. Please let me know whether there's any other boosting coherence cache techniques available.In which case, why bother using Coherence? You're not really gaining anything, are you?
What I'm trying to explain is that you're probably not going to get that "micro-second" level performance on a fully configured Coherence cluster, running across multiple machines, going via proxies for c++ clients. Coherence is designed to be a scalable, fault-tolerant, distributed caching/processing system. It's not really designed for real-time, guaranteed, nano-second/micro-second level processing. There are much better product stacks out there for that type of processing if that is your ultimate goal, IMHO.
As you say, just writing to a small, local Map (or array, List, Set, etc.) in a local JVM is always going to be very fast - literally as fast as the processor running in the machine. But that's not really the focus of a product like Coherence. It isn't trying to "out gun" what you can achieve on one machine doing simple processing; Coherence is designed for scalability rather than outright performance. Of course, the use of local caches (including Coherence's near caching or replicated caching), can get you back some of the performance you've "lost" in a distributed system, but it's all relative.
If you wander over to a few of the CUG presentations and attend a few CUG meetings, one of the first things the support guys will tell you is "benchmark on a proper cluster" and not "on a localised development machine". Why? Because the difference in scalability and performance will be huge. I'm not really trying to deter you from Coherence, but I don't think it's going to meet you requirements when fully configured in a cluster of "1 Micro seconds for 100000 data collection" on a continuous basis.
Just my two cents.
Cheers,
Steve
NB. I don't work for Oracle, so maybe they have a different opinion. :) -
Automatic DOP take more time to execute query
We upgraded database to oracle 11gR2. While testing Automatic DOP feature with our existing query it takes more time than with parallel.
Note: No constrains or Index created on table to gain performance while loading data (5000records / sec)
Os : Sun Solaris 64bit
CPU = 8
RAM = 7456M
Default parameter settings:
parallel_degree_policy string MANUAL
parallel_degree_limit string CPU
parallel_threads_per_cpu integer 2
arallel_degree_limit string CPU
cpu_count integer 8
parallel_threads_per_cpu integer 2
resource_manager_cpu_allocation integer 8
Query:
SELECT COUNT(*)
from (
SELECT
/*+ FIRST_ROWS(50), PARALLEL */
Query gets executed in 22minutes : execution plan
COUNT(*)
9600
Elapsed: 00:22:10.71
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3765539975
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 21 | 2164K (1)| 07:12:52 | | |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 21 | | | | |
| 2 | PARTITION RANGE OR| | 89030 | 1825K| 2164K (1)| 07:12:52 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)|
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SUBSCRIBER_EVENT | 89030 | 1825K| 2164K (1)| 07:12:52 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)|Automatic DOP Query: parameters set
alter session set PARALLEL_DEGREE_POLICY = limited;
alter session force parallel query ;Query:
SELECT COUNT(*)
from (
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(50), PARALLEL*/
This query takes more than 2hrs to execute
COUNT(*)
9600
Elapsed: 02:07:48.81
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 127536830
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart|Pstop | TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 21 | 150K (1)| 00:30:01 | | | | | |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 21 | | | | | | | |
| 2 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ10000 | 1 | 21 | | | | | Q1,00 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 4 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 21 | | | | | Q1,00 | PCWP | |
| 5 | PX BLOCK ITERATOR | | 89030 | 1825K| 150K (1)| 00:30:01 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)| Q1,00 | PCWC | |
|* 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SUBSCRIBER_EVENT | 89030 | 1825K| 150K (1)| 00:30:01 |KEY(OR)|KEY(OR)| Q1,00 | PCWP | |
Note
- automatic DOP: Computed Degree of Parallelism is 16 because of degree limitcan some one help us to find out where we did wrong or any pointer will really helpful to resolve an issue.
Edited by: Sachin B on May 11, 2010 4:05 AMGenerated AWR report for ADOP
Foreground Wait Events DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % DB
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
direct path read 522,173 0 125,051 239 628.4 99.3
db file sequential read 663 0 156 235 0.8 .1
log file sync 165 0 117 712 0.2 .1
Disk file operations I/O 267 0 63 236 0.3 .1
db file scattered read 251 0 36 145 0.3 .0
control file sequential re 217 0 32 149 0.3 .0
library cache load lock 2 0 10 4797 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S wait on X 3 0 9 3149 0.0 .0
read by other session 5 0 2 429 0.0 .0
kfk: async disk IO 613,170 0 2 0 737.9 .0
sort segment request 1 100 1 1007 0.0 .0
os thread startup 16 0 1 43 0.0 .0
direct path write temp 1 0 1 527 0.0 .0
latch free 51 0 0 2 0.1 .0
kksfbc child completion 1 100 0 59 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers chain 19 0 0 2 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 36 0 0 1 0.0 .0
PX Deq: Slave Session Stat 21 0 0 1 0.0 .0
library cache: mutex X 45 0 0 1 0.1 .0
CSS initialization 2 0 0 6 0.0 .0
enq: KO - fast object chec 1 0 0 11 0.0 .0
buffer busy waits 3 0 0 1 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S 9 0 0 0 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 2 0 0 1 0.0 .0
direct path write 1 0 0 2 0.0 .0
jobq slave wait 17,554 100 8,942 509 21.1
PX Deq: Execute Reply 4,060 95 7,870 1938 4.9
SQL*Net message from clien 96 0 5,756 59962 0.1
PX Deq: Execution Msg 618 56 712 1152 0.7
KSV master wait 11 0 0 2 0.0
PX Deq: Join ACK 16 0 0 1 0.0
PX Deq: Parse Reply 14 0 0 1 0.0
Background Wait Events DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % bg
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
control file sequential re 6,249 0 2,375 380 7.5 55.6
control file parallel writ 2,003 0 744 371 2.4 17.4
db file parallel write 1,604 0 503 313 1.9 11.8
log file parallel write 861 0 320 371 1.0 7.5
db file sequential read 363 0 151 415 0.4 3.5
db file scattered read 152 0 64 421 0.2 1.5
Disk file operations I/O 276 0 21 77 0.3 .5
os thread startup 316 0 15 48 0.4 .4
ADR block file read 24 0 11 450 0.0 .3
rdbms ipc reply 17 12 7 403 0.0 .2
Data file init write 6 0 6 1016 0.0 .1
direct path write 21 0 6 287 0.0 .1
log file sync 7 0 6 796 0.0 .1
ADR block file write 10 0 4 414 0.0 .1
enq: JS - queue lock 1 0 3 2535 0.0 .1
ASM file metadata operatio 1,801 0 2 1 2.2 .0
db file parallel read 30 0 1 40 0.0 .0
kfk: async disk IO 955 0 1 1 1.1 .0
db file single write 1 0 0 415 0.0 .0
reliable message 10 0 0 23 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 75 0 0 2 0.1 .0
latch: call allocation 26 0 0 2 0.0 .0
CSS initialization 7 0 0 6 0.0 .0
asynch descriptor resize 352 100 0 0 0.4 .0
undo segment extension 2 100 0 5 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 9 0 0 1 0.0 .0
CSS operation: query 42 0 0 0 0.1 .0
latch: parallel query allo 4 0 0 0 0.0 .0
rdbms ipc message 37,948 97 104,599 2756 45.7
DIAG idle wait 16,762 100 16,927 1010 20.2
ASM background timer 1,724 0 8,467 4912 2.1
shared server idle wait 282 100 8,465 30019 0.3
pmon timer 3,123 90 8,465 2711 3.8
wait for unread message on 8,381 100 8,465 1010 10.1
dispatcher timer 141 100 8,463 60019 0.2
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 604 50 8,462 14010 0.7
Streams AQ: qmn slave idle 304 0 8,462 27836 0.4
smon timer 35 71 8,382 239496 0.0
Space Manager: slave idle 1,621 99 8,083 4986 2.0
PX Idle Wait 2,392 99 4,739 1981 2.9
class slave wait 46 0 623 13546 0.1
KSV master wait 2 0 0 27 0.0
SQL*Net message from clien 7 0 0 1 0.0
Wait Event Histogram DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
% of Waits
Total
Event Waits <1ms <2ms <4ms <8ms <16ms <32ms <=1s >1s
ADR block file read 24 100.0
ADR block file write 10 100.0
ADR file lock 12 100.0
ASM file metadata operatio 1812 99.0 .3 .4 .2 .1
CSS initialization 9 100.0
CSS operation: action 11 90.9 9.1
CSS operation: query 54 100.0
Data file init write 6 16.7 16.7 16.7 50.0
Disk file operations I/O 533 88.7 2.6 .6 1.5 .2 6.4
PX Deq: Signal ACK EXT 4 100.0
PX Deq: Signal ACK RSG 2 100.0
PX Deq: Slave Session Stat 21 42.9 28.6 28.6
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 6 100.0
SQL*Net message to client 102 100.0
SQL*Net more data to clien 4 100.0
asynch descriptor resize 527 100.0
buffer busy waits 4 75.0 25.0
control file parallel writ 2003 9.3 .5 .0 .1 90.0
control file sequential re 6466 10.6 .0 .0 .0 .1 .2 89.0
cursor: pin S 9 100.0
cursor: pin S wait on X 3 33.3 33.3 33.3
db file parallel read 30 6.7 30.0 63.3
db file parallel write 1604 7.4 .1 .6 16.5 75.5
db file scattered read 403 3.7 .2 2.5 13.6 14.9 3.5 61.5
db file sequential read 1017 12.3 .8 2.3 7.3 6.6 2.0 68.8
db file single write 1 100.0
direct path read 522.2 2.2 2.1 .1 .0 1.8 17.9 75.9
direct path write 22 4.5 4.5 90.9
direct path write temp 1 100.0
enq: JS - queue lock 1 100.0
enq: KO - fast object chec 1 100.0
enq: PS - contention 1 100.0
kfk: async disk IO 614.1 100.0 .0
kksfbc child completion 1 100.0
latch free 58 46.6 27.6 15.5 10.3
latch: cache buffers chain 19 36.8 10.5 52.6
latch: call allocation 26 76.9 11.5 7.7 3.8
latch: parallel query allo 4 100.0
latch: shared pool 111 44.1 28.8 27.0
library cache load lock 2 100.0
library cache: mutex X 45 84.4 8.9 4.4 2.2
log file parallel write 861 10.0 .1 .1 89.5 .2
log file sync 172 6.4 90.1 3.5
os thread startup 332 100.0
rdbms ipc reply 18 72.2 11.1 16.7
read by other session 5 100.0
reliable message 11 81.8 9.1 9.1
sort segment request 1 100.0
undo segment extension 2 50.0 50.0
ASM background timer 1724 .8 .6 .1 .6 97.9
DIAG idle wait 16.8K 100.0
KSV master wait 13 7.7 23.1 61.5 7.7
PX Deq: Execute Reply 4060 .4 .0 .0 .1 3.4 96.0
PX Deq: Execution Msg 617 34.7 1.5 2.4 1.5 1.5 .2 .8 57.5
PX Deq: Join ACK 16 93.8 6.3
PX Deq: Parse Reply 14 71.4 7.1 14.3 7.1
PX Idle Wait 2384 .0 .6 99.3
SQL*Net message from clien 103 82.5 1.0 1.9 1.0 13.6
Space Manager: slave idle 1621 .2 99.8
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 604 50.0 50.0
Wait Event Histogram DB/Inst: HDB/hdb Snaps: 158-161
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)Edited by: Sachin B on May 11, 2010 4:52 AM -
Af:commandNavigationItem takes more time to perform action on screen
For my project there is a dynamic implementation of af:commandNavigationItem and the actions also will be binded during runtime.
This code was working fine with the JDeveloper 11.1.1.0.2 (OWS 10.3.0) Version, but after migrating the code to JDeveloper 11.1.1.2.0 (OWS 10.3.2), it shows hourglass for a longer time (which was unusual) and then it perform the operation.
I ran the project in Debug mode and I found it takes more time to come to the breakpoint.
It writes the below information in console
<UnifiedDialogTag><setVisible> property "visible" setter is using a no-op implementation. Used in extreme cases when the property value, beyond the default value, results in unwanted behavior.
Experts: Please through some light to proceed with this issue as I am looking some lead information from where I have to look into the issue.Hi,
can you file a bug or provide a testcase ?
Frank -
Hi Experts,
Users raising bill using MIRO it takes more time when i check throuh SM50 and st03 i found that the data fectching from the table BSEG takes more time kinldy let me know whether i need to increase table parameter.....size if so how can i do that ?
Regards...
VenkiThe famous BSEG table is a cluster table.
It holds the Accounting Document Segment. It is part of the Pool cluster RFBLG and lives in the package: FBAS (Financial accounting 'Basis').
You can't read a cluster table exactly the way you read a database (old speak, transparent table).
You can use a program to read called RFPPWF05
Note 435694: Display BSEG item by calling FB09D (modified FB09)
Other possiblity: Other possibility: CALL DIALOG 'RF_ZEILEN_ANZEIGE', but since this is a dialog I don't think this would work.
In any event go to FBAS Package (development class) to see your business objects, class library and functions.
Having such criticality, you set to tablepsace to 'autogrow'
Regards
Sekhar -
Hi all
I want to fetch just twenty thousands records from table. My query take more time to fetch twenty thousands records. I post my working query, Could you correct the query for me. thanks in advance.
Query
select
b.Concatenated_account Account,
b.Account_description description,
SUM(case when(Bl.ACTUAL_FLAG='B') then
((NVL(Bl.PERIOD_NET_DR, 0)- NVL(Bl.PERIOD_NET_CR, 0)) + (NVL(Bl.PROJECT_TO_DATE_DR, 0)- NVL(Bl.PROJECT_TO_DATE_CR, 0)))end) "Budget_2011"
from
gl_balances Bl,
gl_code_combinations GCC,
psb_ws_line_balances_i b ,
gl_budget_versions bv,
gl_budgets_v gv
where
b.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=gcc.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and bl.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=gcc.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and
bl.budget_version_id =bv.BUDGET_VERSION_ID and gv.budget_version_id= bv.budget_version_id
and gv.latest_opened_year in (select latest_opened_year-3 from gl_budgets_v where latest_opened_year=:BUDGET_YEAR )
group by b.Concatenated_account ,b.Account_descriptionHi,
If this question is related to SQL then please post in SQL forum.
Otherwise provide more information how this sql is being used and do you want to tune the SQL or the way it fetches the information from DB and display in OAF.
Regards,
Sandeep M. -
Takes more time to start & shutdown the database
Hi All,
I have created a database in oracle9i by following manual steps. Every thing was created successfully and am able to start the database and shutdown also.
but the problem is while giving the startup command it takes more time to start the database and the same during the shutdown. So anyone help me..
the follwing are the pfile specifications:
db_name=practice
instance_name=practice
control_files= 'E:\practice\control\control1.ctl',
'D:\practice\control\control2.ctl'
db_block_size=2048
db_cache_size=20m
shared_pool_size=20m
background_dump_dest='E:\practice\bdump'
user_dump_dest='E:\practice\udump'
Thanks in AdvanceEvery thing was created successfully and am able to start the database and > shutdown also.Please restate the above.
problem is while giving the startup command it takes more time to start the >database and the same during the shutdownHow have you compared? Could it be O/S resources, installation of additional software; you have not mentioned the O/S and complete version of your database.
You can review the following although I am bit unclear;
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96533/instreco.htm#440322
Adith -
PDF Form Takes More Time To Open when using designer 7.1.3129.1.296948
Hi All,
Adobe Reader Version : 8 and above.
designer : 7.1.3129.1.296948
When i am devloping the adobe interactive form Using designer 7.1.3129.1.296948, When I open the same in the adobe reader 8.1.2 and 9.1 its take more time (Nearly 20 mins).
When I am opening the same in the adobe reader 7.1 its opening fine.
How to resolve This problem in adobe reader 8.1.2,9.0 and 9.1 ?
Regards,
Boopathi MHi,
I have seen this exact same problem happening when, I created/developed a adobe form, on a PC which had adobe livecycle designer 7.1, but had adobe reader 7.
Once the form is created on a machine which had reader 7, then it does not matter whether u try to open that pdf in reader 8 or 9, it will take 20-30min to open, it will freeze your pc, etc.
Please ensure that when/where ever the form was first created, that machine had adobe reader 8 or higher installed it.
I hope this helps,
Regards,
Hanoz -
PDF Form Takes More Time To Open when using designer 7.1.3129.1.296948 + Reader 8 above
Hi All,
When i am developing the adobe interactive form Using designer 7.1.3129.1.296948,After that I converted to PDF.
When I am opening the PDF form its takes more time(Using reader version 8.1.2).
How to resolve This problem ?
Regards,
Boopathi MHi,
I have seen this exact same problem happening when, I created/developed a adobe form, on a PC which had adobe livecycle designer 7.1, but had adobe reader 7.
Once the form is created on a machine which had reader 7, then it does not matter whether u try to open that pdf in reader 8 or 9, it will take 20-30min to open, it will freeze your pc, etc.
Please ensure that when/where ever the form was first created, that machine had adobe reader 8 or higher installed it.
I hope this helps,
Regards,
Hanoz -
'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document
Hi Experts,
I m using 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' in my custom report, it takes more time for creating Material documents.
Please let me know if there is any option to overcome this issue.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
LeoHi,
please check if some of following OSS notes are not valid for your problem:
[Note 838036 - AFS: Performance issues during GR with ref. to PO|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/838036]
[Note 391142 - Performance: Goods receipt for inbound delivery|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/391142]
[Note 1414418 - Goods receipt for customer returns: Various corrections|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1414418]
The other idea is not to commit each call, but executing commit of packages e.g. after 1000 BAPI calls.
But otherwise, I am afraid you can not do a lot about performance of standard BAPI. Maybe there is some customer enhancement which is taking too long inside the BAPI, but this has to be analysed by you. To analyse performance, just execute your program via tr. SE30.
Regards
Adrian -
'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document for the 1st time
Hi Experts,
I am doing goods movement using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE in my custom code.
Then there is some functional configuration such that, material documents and TR and TO are getting created.
Now I need to get TO and TR numbers from LTAK table passing material documnt number and year, which I got from above used BAPI.
The problem I am facing is very strange.
Only for the 1st time, I am not finding TR and TO values in LTAK table. And subsequent runs I get entries in LTAK in there is a wait time of 5 seconds after bapi call.
I have found 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document with similar issue, but no solution or explanation.
Note 838036 says something similar, but it seems obsolete.
Kindly share your expertise and opinions.
Thanks,
AnilHi,
please check if some of following OSS notes are not valid for your problem:
[Note 838036 - AFS: Performance issues during GR with ref. to PO|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/838036]
[Note 391142 - Performance: Goods receipt for inbound delivery|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/391142]
[Note 1414418 - Goods receipt for customer returns: Various corrections|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1414418]
The other idea is not to commit each call, but executing commit of packages e.g. after 1000 BAPI calls.
But otherwise, I am afraid you can not do a lot about performance of standard BAPI. Maybe there is some customer enhancement which is taking too long inside the BAPI, but this has to be analysed by you. To analyse performance, just execute your program via tr. SE30.
Regards
Adrian -
Hi All,
I have cloned KSB1 tcode to custom one as required by business.
Below query takes more time than excepted.
Here V_DB_TABLE = COVP.
Values in Where clause are as follows
OBNJR in ( KSBB010000001224 BT KSBB012157221571)
GJAHR in blank
VERSN in '000'
WRTTP in '04' and '11'
all others are blank
VT_VAR_COND = ( CPUDT BETWEEN '20091201' and '20091208' )
SELECT (VT_FIELDS) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF GS_COVP_EXT
FROM (V_DB_TABLE)
WHERE LEDNR = '00'
AND OBJNR IN LR_OBJNR
AND GJAHR IN GR_GJAHR
AND VERSN IN GR_VERSN
AND WRTTP IN GR_WRTTP
AND KSTAR IN LR_KSTAR
AND PERIO IN GR_PERIO
AND BUDAT IN GR_BUDAT
AND PAROB IN GR_PAROB
AND (VT_VAR_COND).
Checked in table for this condition it has only 92 entries.
But when i execute program takes long time as 3 Hrs.
Could any one help me on this>1.Dont use SELECT/ENDSELECT instead use INTO TABLE addition .
> 2.Avoid using corresponding addition.create a type and reference it.
> If the select is going for dump beacause of storage limitations ,then use Cursors.
you got three large NOs .... all three recommendations are wrong!
The SE16 test is going in the right direction ... but what was filled. Nobody knows!!!!
Select options:
Did you ever try to trace the SE16? The generic statement has for every field an in-condition!
Without the information what was actually filled, nobody can say something there
are at least 2**n combinations possible!
Use ST05 for SE16 and check actual statement plus explain! -
How to stop the sap crm search in the middle if it takes more time
Hi,
We are in SAP CRM 7.0 EHP1.
In webui, if we search for any customer, product, contact, transactions and the volume of results list is more, system takes more time to diplay it in results list and till that time wheel spins. If user decides to stop the search, the only option they have is logoff or F5 which will take to new session.
But I came to know in EHP1, options are there to stop the search manually and proceed with other transactions/search in the same session.If any one knows this, pl share the details.
Regards
SureshHello,
This functionality was recently introduced by the following note:
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2044841
Regards
Joaquin
Maybe you are looking for
-
No internet access via ethernet port
Hi, have been using my emac via ethernet cable to router, for many months with NO problem accessing internet and others cabled to same router also having no problem and I have used my Pwr Mac wtih no problem and have never had to make any specific se
-
Why aren't photos loading onto my video ipod?
I don't even have a tab on the left hand side of my itunes to load photos. My friend says hers just loaded, but nothing has happened to mine. Heeeelp!
-
How can I FaceTime him without getting, "This person is not availible?
-
Hi All, I need some assistance for my below query... If there are already existing some product/quote lines on the quote and then we try to add another new product/quote line to this quote , then it is taking more time to add the product. As per my
-
Step failure causes sequence failure Option
Hi ! I need some clarification about the Step failure causes sequence failure Option , I'm using TS 4.2 Under Win XP . Lets say i have a Seq with 4 steps in all of then Step failure causes sequence failure Option is Checked . Record Result in all of