Shifting of consumer becoming slower with time

Oracle database 8i
OS windows 2000 server
I have one procedure for Shifting of consumers from one electric pole to another which incluedes updation and deletion at one go and no commit after each migration but commit at last.
After execution of procedure it takes 10 sec to migrate one consumer but
after a while it takes 2 to 5 minutes for each consumer.
I guess it's a matter related to rollback segment .
How I can maintain the consistency in performance?

I guess it's a matter related to rollback segment .Instead of guess, I would advise you to get a 10046 trace for the given workflow and pinpoint the problem.

Similar Messages

Why is Oracle Response time getting slow with time.

Hi,
     I have DB which was very fast initially with the response time for one of the query < 5 sec.
     I have been using the DB for the last 15 days. Now the same query is taking 10 minutes. In the DB there are lot of operations of additions and deletions been done on the table where the query is being made. The no. of records in the table is constant at around 3 million records from the first day.
     If I import the DB into a new setup then again the response time becomes very good in the new setup.
     What should be the problem of the DB getting slow with the time.
Thanks,
Tuhin

It all depends on several factors.
Are your tables,indexes have upto-date statistics?
I have DB which was very fast initially with the response time for one of the query < 5 sec. Initially there might be small amount of data later data might have increased,you dont have proper indexes.
It could be that your indexes got fragmented to due to heavey deletes? It might need reorg.
My suggestion would to look into your execution plan of the quries and see where your kernals are waiting.
As other suggested you, use explain plan, event 10046 and tkprof.
Jaffar

Does the iPad get slower with time?

i have an iPad 4 for over a year. Does the iPad get slower with the passage of time or because of small amount of available?

As with any piece of electronics, the more stuff you get on there, the more clutter and the more 'junk' (not meaning offensively, just junk as extra files, fragmented files, etc) that it has to run through.
If you think it's getting too slow, you can fully back it up, then reset your iPad back to factory settings (erase all content and settings) and then restore from that backup.
It's not impossible, just something to do carefully because if you haven't backed everything up correctly, you will lose it. (content and apps from iTunes can always be redownloaded but content made on your iPad can be deleted if not backed up)
I've had my iPad 2 for almost three years now and really haven't noticed a major decline in function. So unless you see something drastic, I really wouldn't worry about it.

Arch turning slow with time

Hello! I re-installed arch linux on my computer using the Beginners Guide from the wiki. But now when I use the computer i turns slow over time, I'm talking if I leave it on for 3 hours+. By slow I mean that I am typing this sentence, and I'm expecting to see it 3 seconds after pressing the ".". It's fine when I reboot, running blazingly fast but after that 3 hour mark, happens no matter what I use to computer for. It's weird as the first time I installed arch this didn't happen, after having searched high and low on Google I have no re-installed the OS three times (every time with the same problem). I would love to add some files explaining the problem, but I really have no idea where to even begin looking, so I'll just list some specs.
I'm running:
Gnome
64 bit arch, not using testing or unstable
Normal use would be cmus, libre office and chromium running.
Hardware wise everything should be OK, when in windows I'm running battlefield 3 and other hardware hungry games without problems, also the same problem does not happen in windows. Let it be noted that Windows is on a harddrive, and arch is on a SSD drive (120 GB Kingston HyperX)
I have checked my hostname, rc.conf etc and they all seem to be OK, any suggestions?

Hello! The problem is still persistent, I've just "lived with" ubuntu for some time as I've had my exam period + two new jobs so there has not been time.
It is a desktop, with rather powerful hardware (running most modern games on full without problems)
I did check /etc/hosts and it matched with /etc/rc.conf.
Again it's blazing after a reboot, but a few hours on (like now) it's very, very slow. even typing text is laggy.
http://bildr.no/image/1200991.jpeg <- htop
Since last time I posted I have re-installed arch, re-installing did not change any thing.
Hardware:
Intel i5 2500k
Nvidia GeForce 5600 (with the nvidia + nvidia-utils driver)
ASUS P8Z68-V motherboard
Windows and Ubuntu is both running fine, but really, I'd much prefer using arch.
again, thank you for all replies : )
I run "pacman -Syu" every day.

Macbook air has suddenly become slow takes time to load any page

My macbook air has suddenly become slow in loading pages whether they are on the net or if I am opening a page on the hard drive, need advise on what to do.

what OS are you using?is that happening upon fresh restart?

Shift + command + f   very slow with cs4 clone and healing tool?

using cs4-- i use the shift + command + f a lot to fade in or out the clone tool and healing brush.
however in cs4 the preview is very slow-- even though i have 8gb of ram!
the same process on the same file in cs3 is rapid-- even with only 2gb of ram-- so i assume this is a cs4 problem?
any solutions appreciated.

Do you mean photoshop elements 7 and not premiere elements?
The fix posted above only applies to linux os systems, which is
different from mac and windows.
On windows vista Alt+left click is to set the clone source.
Try the following steps one at a time.
1. reset the clone stamp tool by clicking triangle on the far left of the
   tool options bar and select reset tool.
2. Go to Edit>Preset Manager and click Done in the dialog that appears.
3. Reset the elements 7 preferences by holding down the Shift+Alt+Ctrl keys
    at the same time you start elements 7. In the dialog that appears, click yes.
Hope this helps.
MTSTUNER

Will java programs become slower with generics?

This is not a question, more lika general discussion. I'd like to know what you think.
I fear that the average java developer will become accustom to the new features of java and write inefficient code. I have included a sample program that shows new code vs. old code. Altough the new code is esier to read, it's also alot slower.
For instance the foreach instruction is using an iterator which is created and then iterated. When the loop exits the Iterator is garanage collected. Better performance would be achieved if there was a "Getable" interface of some sort was implemented and that the foreach simply asked the collections class for the next object in line. Perhapps if the ArrayList cached it's Iterator objects, somehow. (I'm not suggesting any of the solutions above. I'm just trying to make a point.)
Also regarding generics and enumerations it's easy to see how they will slow down the application. It gets even scarier when you consider that important foundation classes are updated with these new features. A small change in some AWT class may have unforeseen repercussions throughout all gui applications.
Gafter, if you read this, is there any tests made to see if this is true. Is performance affected by the new features? Will old style code be replace by new style code in the foundation classes (awt/swing/.../... etc.).
ArrayList<String> ss = new ArrayList<String>();
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ss.add("hello");
// "new" java ... completes in 6.43 seconds
long t1 = System.nanoTime();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
     for (String s : ss)
System.out.println(System.nanoTime()-t1);
// "old" java ... completes in 2.58 seconds
long t2 = System.nanoTime();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
     for (int j = 0, size = ss.size(); j < size; j++)
          String s = ss.get(j);
System.out.println(System.nanoTime()-t2);

Adapting Neal's example for JDK 1.4:
    private static final String[] strArray = new String[0];
    private static void withToArray() {
        List ss = new ArrayList();
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ss.add("hello");
        long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            String[] ssArray = (String[]) ss.toArray(strArray);
            for (int j=0; j < ssArray.length; j++) {
                String s = ssArray[j];
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-t1);
    private static final String[] strArray100 = new String[100];
    private static void withToArrayAndCheatingOnLength() {
        List ss = new ArrayList();
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ss.add("hello");
        long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            String[] ssArray = (String[]) ss.toArray(strArray100);
            for (int j=0; j < ssArray.length; j++) {
                String s = ssArray[j];
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-t1);
    private static void withToArrayAndCheatingOnLengthLocalVar() {
        List ss = new ArrayList();
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ss.add("hello");
        final String[] localStrArray100 = new String[100];
        long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            String[] ssArray = (String[]) ss.toArray(localStrArray100);
            for (int j=0; j < ssArray.length; j++) {
                String s = ssArray[j];
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-t1);
    } Allocating the string[] every time: 5812
Allocating the correctly sized string[] once, as a private final static: 2953
Allocating the correctly sized string[] once, as a final local var: 3141
Interesting that the private final static is 90ms faster than the local variable, fairly consistently.
What's interesting about that though, is that we're not iterating strArray100, we're iterating over ssArray, so its not clear why it should make a difference. If I modify things a little more:
    private static void withToArrayAndLoopOptimization() {
        List ss = new ArrayList();
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ss.add("hello");
        long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            String[] ssArray = (String[]) ss.toArray(strArray100);
            final int length = ssArray.length;
            for (int j=0; j < length; j++) {
                String s = ssArray[j];
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-t1);
    private static void withToArrayAndLoopOptimizationLocalVar() {
        List ss = new ArrayList();
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) ss.add("hello");
        final String[] localStrArray100 = new String[100];
        long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
        for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
            String[] ssArray = (String[]) ss.toArray(localStrArray100);
            final int length = ssArray.length;
            for (int j=0; j < length; j++) {
                String s = ssArray[j];
        System.out.println(System.currentTimeMillis()-t1);
    } With private static final and loop optimization: 2937
With local variable and loop optimization: 2922
Now the different has disappeared: in fact, the numbers are exactly the same on many runs. You have to make 'length' final to get the best speed.
I guess I'm disappointed that in 2004, Java 1.4 javac & Hotspot combined still cannot spot the simplest loop optimization in the book.... always assuming that's actually causing the preformance difference. My gut is telling me its something else causing the difference because all of the inner loops are iterating over ssArray, not strArray100 (wherever that happends to be declared).
Someone care to run Neal's example on 1.5 and see if they've managed to optimize further under the covers?

My Network gets slower with time capsule... why?

I Buy a Time Capsule for only for use it as backup HDD in my work but after i install it and configure it the network gets slower but onli with the machines that have the gateway configured, because the machines that dont have internet connection (no gateway and no DHCP only static ip), they are fast as allways
we use Windows Server enterprise 2008 r2 with ADSL connection and terminal server configured and a network domain on it.
and the machines have windows 7 and xp.
I hope someone know why this happened.
thanks.

And if you don't have luck on the SL forum then I'd recommend posting on the Airport forum. You can find that at:
https://discussions.apple.com/community/wireless/airport

Watching movies with Apple TV slow with Time Capsule

I recently got rid of my Linksys router and replaced it with a Time Capsule, it acts as my backup storage as well as my router.
Ever since then, my apple TV is extremely slow when downloading movies. It used to take about 30 seconds to be able to watch the movie and now it's 1-4 hours.
My network speeds are fine, I can do speed tests and get 5-10Mbit down, so I'm not entirely sure what is going on.

Hello optize. Welcome to the Apple Discussions!
I assume that you are using the new Time Capsule (TC) to stream movies to your Apple TV (ATV) ... correct?
If so, to improve streaming performance, you may need to try some of the following to find what will work best for your network configuration.
o If both the TC & ATV are wirelessly connected to each other, switch the radio mode to "802.11n only (5 GHz)."
o If you must operate your wireless network in the 2.4 GHz radio band to support non-"n" clients, try a different radio channel.
o Connect the TC & ATV by Ethernet.
o Temporarily disable Time Machine backups from running when streaming movies.
As you are probably already aware, the iTunes Store offers both standard definition (SD) and high definition (HD) video for rental and purchase. MPEG4-compressed 1,080p requires about 10 Mbps of throughput to stream without artifacts. As such, Apple’s SD and HD video would require between 2 and 5 Mbps for decent streaming over a network. A 802.11g network should top 20 Mbps in throughput, but could be lower speeds due to Wi-Fi interference. In contrast, a 802.11n network, with only n devices connected, can hit 90+ Mbps.

Wireless significantly slower with time capsule

I have a 2T apple time capsule running latest firmware 7.6.4. I have Cox cable and a 150 mb plan. When I connect my iMac to the modem, I am consistently getting 175mb connections. When I connect the TC, my speed over wireless drops to a 50mb connection. I have restarted the TC with no effect at all on the speed. I have attempted to restore the TC's settings through airport utility, but I just keep getting the "restore" window with the "spinning circle"--i.e. it ill not restore. Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you. Also, I should add that the iMac is upstairs while the TC is downstairs. I get a strong wireless signal. I would assume download speeds will vary, but I wouldd not expect my speed to be 1/3 of what it should be. Thanks again.

I would expect exactly what you are getting.
Wireless is not going to transfer real world speeds higher than about link speed divided by 3, maybe even 4.
Find your link speed. Hold down the option key and click the wireless fan in the top menu area.
Take the transmit rate and divide by 3..
You should realise that wireless is limited by Apple to 130Mbps at 2.4ghz although in newer equipment you can achieve 217Mbps.
For 5ghz the speed will be 450Mbps in the same room but drops off quickly.. the above shot is with the TC in the next room.. max link speed dropped from 450 to 162 as drop off at 5ghz is very rapid.

Slowness with Time Capsule

Ive had an Apple TV for about 1.5 years. I have been using an Airport Extreme as my home router with Comcast High Speed interet, and they have worked great together.. The speed was flawless.. and neve had to wait more than 10 seconds to start playing a movie.
I just replaced my AE with a 2GB Time Capsule because my back up drive had broken. Ever since my internet speed on Apple TV has gone to crap. I use Itunes Radio alot, and now I can't get it to continuously stream. I also use iTunes Match, and it constantly stops and starts while playing music. As for movies, forget it... It takes forever to get it started, and when it does, it buffers every 3-5 minutes during the movie...
At first I thought it was because I was backing up all the time, so I turned off Auto-backup on my MacBook Pro. No change..
Is the Time Capsule not as fast as an Airport Extreme? I haven't changed anything on my ATV3... or my modem. I leterally switched out the AE for the TC.. got my HD backed up.. and that's it..
Regular interent seems fine (on my computer and ipad).. but Apple TV gets stuck all the time..

Hi ejs71,
The Airport Extreme and Time Capsule have the same Wi-Fi specifications, see the first link for more details. Also, take a look at the second article which has some great tips that may resolve the issue.
Apple - Wi-Fi - Compare Wi-Fi base stations
http://www.apple.com/compare-wifi-models/
Apple TV (2nd and 3rd generation): Troubleshooting Wi-Fi networks and connections
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4546
Apple TV unexpectedly disconnects from the Wi-Fi network or signal strength is weak or fluctuates
Check for any obstructions and adjust the location of your router or Apple TV; also check for sources ofpotential interference.
Update your Wi-Fi router to the latest firmware.For an AirPort Base Station, refer to this article for information about firmware updates. For third-party Wi-Fi routers, check the manufacturer's website for details on updating your firmware.
If after attempting the above steps, your Apple TV is still unable to connect to your Wi-Fi network:
Restart your Apple TV: Choose Settings > General > Restart.
If you can connect to the Internet using an Ethernet connection, verify that your Apple TV is using the latest software by choosing Settings > General > Software Update. If your Apple TV can be updated, install the update and test again.
Good luck!
-Jason

Slows with time

MacBook Pro, about 2 yrs old, 500 gig hard drive about 200 free, 4GB Memory. 2.67 Ghz, OS 10.5.8.
It runs fine when I turn it on, but then slows to a C R A W L after about 2 hours. Took about a minute to get this screen to open when I clicked on Start A New Discussion. Whether using Safari, or non-I'net apps, it is very slow.
Restart does not help.
Turning it off altogether however brings it back to usual speed.
The unit is not unusually hot.
Happens whether running on AC or battery.
ANy ideas?
Thanks

I have almost the exact setup as you, and airtunes never slows down my internet connection.
Has it just happened recently? Have you done a reset on the TC? Make sure you are using the g network, and not in the b only mode.
You can also make sure everything on the network are getting good signal. You can check the signal strength from Airport Utility (in the logs and Stats pane).

Sir i am using datasocket read ,i am communicating with java but my problem is that bcz im using while loop to see if value has changed my labview consumes all the processors time ,sir i want a event like thing so that while loop is not in continuous loop

sir i have given lot of effort but i am not able to solve my problem either with notifiers or with occurence fn,probably i do not know how to use these synchronisation tools.

sir i am using datasocket read ,i am communicating with java but my problem is that bcz im using while loop to see if value has changed my labview consumes all the processors time ,sir i want a event like thing so that while loop is not in continuous loopHi Sam,
I want to pass along a couple of tips that will get you more and better response on this list.
1) There is an un-written rule that says more "stars" is better than just one star. Giving a one star rating will probably eliminate that responder from individuals that are willing to anser your question.
2) If someone gives you an answer that meets your needs, reply to that answer and say that it worked.
3) If someone suggests that you look at an example, DO IT! LV comes with a wonderful set of examples that demonstate almost all of the core functionality of LV. Familiarity with all of the LV examples will get you through about 80% of the Certified LabVIEW Developer exam.
4) If you have a question first search the examples for something tha
t may help you. If you can not find an example that is exactly what you want, find one that is close and post a question along the lines of "I want to do something similar to example X, how can I modify it to do Y".
5) Some of the greatest LabVIEW minds offer there services and advice for free on this exchange. If you treat them good, they can get you through almost every challenge that can be encountered in LV.
6) If English is not your native language, post your question in the language you favor. There is probably someone around that can help. "We're big, we're bad, we're international!"
Trying to help,
Welcome to the forum!
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

How can I determine if my iMac is infected with Malware. Internet is very slow at times.

Some time ago I opened a link in an email from a friend and later found out that his email address had been hijacked. The site the link took me to seemed innocuous, but ever since it seems that from time to time that my internet connection is very slow, as if there is not enough band width. Is it possible that my computer is infected with some sort of malware? How can I determine that? If it is infected how can the malware be removed?

Here is the report.
Problem description:
I clicked on a link in a email from a hacked email account and since then my internet connection runs very slow at times. I am concerned that my iMac may be infected with some sort of Malware
EtreCheck version: 2.1.6 (109)
Report generated January 21, 2015 at 12:26:10 PM MST
Download EtreCheck from http://etresoft.com/etrecheck
Click the [Support] links for help with non-Apple products.
Click the [Details] links for more information about that line.
Click the [Adware] links for help removing adware.
Hardware Information: ℹ️
iMac (21.5-inch, Late 2009) (Technical Specifications)
iMac - model: iMac10,1
1 3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo CPU: 2-core
12 GB RAM Upgradeable
BANK 0/DIMM0
4 GB DDR3 1067 MHz ok
BANK 1/DIMM0
4 GB DDR3 1067 MHz ok
BANK 0/DIMM1
2 GB DDR3 1067 MHz ok
BANK 1/DIMM1
2 GB DDR3 1067 MHz ok
Bluetooth: Old - Handoff/Airdrop2 not supported
Wireless: en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
Video Information: ℹ️
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 - VRAM: 256 MB
iMac 1920 x 1080
System Software: ℹ️
OS X 10.10.1 (14B25) - Time since boot: 1:8:36
Disk Information: ℹ️
WDC WD5000AAKS-40V2B0 disk0 : (500.11 GB)
EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / : 499.25 GB (398.65 GB free)
Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted> [Recovery]: 650 MB
PIONEER DVD-RW DVRTS09
USB Information: ℹ️
Apple Inc. Built-in iSight
Apple Internal Memory Card Reader
Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
Apple Inc. BRCM2046 Hub
Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
Gatekeeper: ℹ️
Mac App Store and identified developers
Kernel Extensions: ℹ️
/Library/Extensions
[loaded] com.symantec.kext.SymAPComm (12.7.1f4 - SDK 10.8) [Support]
[loaded] com.symantec.kext.filesecurity (12.7f4 - SDK 10.8) [Support]
[loaded] com.symantec.kext.fw (5.3.1f4 - SDK 10.8) [Support]
[loaded] com.symantec.kext.internetSecurity (5.4f4 - SDK 10.8) [Support]
[loaded] com.symantec.kext.ips (3.9.2f1 - SDK 10.8) [Support]
[loaded] com.symantec.kext.pf (5.7.1f4 - SDK 10.8) [Support]
/System/Library/Extensions
[not loaded] com.seagate.driver.PowSecDriverCore (5.2.4 - SDK 10.4) [Support]
/System/Library/Extensions/Seagate Storage Driver.kext/Contents/PlugIns
[not loaded] com.seagate.driver.PowSecLeafDriver_10_4 (5.2.4 - SDK 10.4) [Support]
[not loaded] com.seagate.driver.PowSecLeafDriver_10_5 (5.2.4 - SDK 10.5) [Support]
[not loaded] com.seagate.driver.SeagateDriveIcons (5.2.4 - SDK 10.4) [Support]
Launch Agents: ℹ️
[running] com.brother.LOGINserver.plist [Support]
[loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist [Support]
[loaded] com.symantec.errorreporter-periodicagent.plist [Support]
[loaded] com.symantec.nis.application.plist [Support]
[running] com.symantec.uiagent.application.plist [Support]
Launch Daemons: ℹ️
[loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist [Support]
[running] com.fitbit.galileod.plist [Support]
[loaded] com.google.keystone.daemon.plist [Support]
[running] com.sec.faxdb.plist [Support]
[running] com.symantec.deepsight-extractor.plist [Support]
[loaded] com.symantec.errorreporter-periodic.plist [Support]
[loaded] com.symantec.liveupdate.daemon.ondemand.plist [Support]
[loaded] com.symantec.liveupdate.daemon.plist [Support]
[invalid?] com.symantec.MissedTasks.plist [Support]
[not loaded] com.symantec.nav.migrateqtf.plist [Support]
[invalid?] com.symantec.Sched501-1.plist [Support]
[running] com.symantec.sharedsettings.plist [Support]
[running] com.symantec.symdaemon.plist [Support]
[invalid?] com.symantec.symSchedDaemon.plist [Support]
User Launch Agents: ℹ️
[loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist [Support]
[invalid?] com.google.GoogleContactSyncAgent.plist [Support]
User Login Items: ℹ️
Microsoft AU Daemon Application (/Applications/Microsoft AutoUpdate.app/Contents/MacOS/Microsoft AU Daemon.app)
Fitbit Connect Menubar Helper Application (/Applications/Fitbit Connect.app/Contents/MacOS/Fitbit Connect Menubar Helper.app)
Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
o1dbrowserplugin: Version: 5.38.6.0 - SDK 10.8 [Support]
Default Browser: Version: 600 - SDK 10.10
Flip4Mac WMV Plugin: Version: 2.3.8.1 [Support]
AdobePDFViewerNPAPI: Version: 11.0.10 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 16.0.0.257 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
Silverlight: Version: 5.1.30317.0 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
Flash Player: Version: 16.0.0.257 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
iPhotoPhotocast: Version: 7.0
googletalkbrowserplugin: Version: 5.38.6.0 - SDK 10.8 [Support]
QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
AdobePDFViewer: Version: 11.0.10 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
CouponPrinter-FireFox_v2: Version: Version 1.1.6 [Support]
GarminGpsControl: Version: 2.9.3.0 Release [Support]
NortonInternetSecurityBF: Version: 1.11.0 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
JavaAppletPlugin: Version: 15.0.0 - SDK 10.10 Check version
User internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
Google Earth Web Plug-in: Version: 7.1 [Support]
Safari Extensions: ℹ️
Norton Internet Security [Installed]
3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
Flash Player [Support]
Flip4Mac WMV [Support]
Norton\nQuickMenu [Support]
Time Machine: ℹ️
Skip System Files: NO
Mobile backups: OFF
Auto backup: NO - Auto backup turned off
Volumes being backed up:
Macintosh HD: Disk size: 499.25 GB Disk used: 100.60 GB
Destinations:
Seagate Backup Plus Drive [Local]
Total size: 1.00 TB
Total number of backups: 15
Oldest backup: 2013-08-01 22:49:49 +0000
Last backup: 2014-11-06 19:34:10 +0000
Size of backup disk: Adequate
Backup size 1.00 TB > (Disk used 100.60 GB X 3)
Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
      5% WindowServer
      1% Fitbit Connect Menubar Helper
      0% fontd
      0% AppleSpell
      0% launchservicesd
Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
580 MB com.apple.dock.extra
322 MB SymDaemon
206 MB Google Chrome
168 MB spindump
155 MB mds_stores
Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
7.46 GB Free RAM
2.59 GB Active RAM
1.51 GB Inactive RAM
1.05 GB Wired RAM
2.56 GB Page-ins
0 B Page-outs
Diagnostics Information: ℹ️
Jan 21, 2015, 11:23:52 AM /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/rpcsvchost_2015-01-21-112352_[redacted].cpu_res ource.diag [Details]
Jan 21, 2015, 11:18:14 AM Self test - passed

HT1040 why can i not seem to order more than one print at a time, which obviously becomes expensive with the shipping, it does not seem to offer me the facility to choose again?

why can i not seem to order more than one print at a time, which of course becomes expensive with shipping, it does not seem to offer me the facility to choose again? either order or cancel!

make an album containing the photos you wnat to print, select all photos in the album and order
LN

Shifting of consumer becoming slower with time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for