Shippment cost settlement - reg.

Hi,
I created shipment cost number (Using Tcode VI01) based on the shipment number created. Then we tried to settle the shipment cost by clicking the Transfer button in the Settlement tab in the Tcode VI02.
But while settling system is checking for the Service PO availability. We have created the service PO also. But we don't know where to assign this Service PO to appear in the shipment cost number.
Thanks
Mani.R

Dear Mani,
Normally After checking the Transfer check system will create the Service PO automatically based on the IMG settings.
You can see the Service PO Number in the Service procurement tab (Adjusent to Settlement tab) in the field Purchasing Doc.
I don't think you can assign service PO Manually in the shipment cost document.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.
Edited by: Murali Mohan.Tallapaneni on Sep 18, 2008 7:11 AM

Similar Messages

Shippment cost-service tax

Hi SD Guru,
I am working on shippment whre i stuck at shippment cost level for service tax assigment.
my client want service tax should get calculate at shippment cost level i.e. at VI01 and it should be posted while settlement to service tax payable account as its liability for client
I have configure shippment procedure and i maintained condition type for service tax in shippment procedure only,but there i don't find any account key colums so how system will determine account for service tax,how is the linking of tax code and G/l acount will develop.
In VI01 screen i found tax code field but uit is in disable mode(gray field) how to get it acctivated
regards
hemant

Hi Murli,
Thanks for your reply. In shippment cost settlement account determination is done for only for shippment cost condition and not a sales tax condition.In fact there is no condition type for sales tax in shippment cost procedure. there is no posting key for sales tax .
Please advice any solution if you have any.
Bye
Hemant

POD has to take as reference document to settle the shippment costs to the

Hi all,
This is my requirement flow Sales order --> Delivery > Invoice> POD (Prof of Delivery) --> Shipping cost settlement(need to take POD as reference Document).
For the above process how can we configure or customise in SAP.
1.POD will need to come after Invoice
2. Based on POD I will need to create Shipping cost settlement Document.
2.The system should not allow to create shipping cost settlement doc if there is no POD (Prof of Delivery) for the deliveries which I shipped.
Please reply back as early as possible.
Regarda,
Murali.

Hi Lakshmipathi,
A very helpful answer, given by you.But in our case if at all i am trying to change it into warning message it is effecting another sales organization. In one server Client is maintaining two company codes data. So it might effect the other.
We have developed a new routine named 901 by copying the standard 002 and maintained in the copy controls(VTAA) for that relevant Document types. We are able to take the reference by doing this. But the problem is when i am taking the reference of other sales area and document type , Document is changing but sales area is coming of the reference document.
Example :
1000 : SO
11 & 13 : Dist Ch(Domestic) and 12 for Deemed
11 : Division common
ZFQT : DOMESTIC QUOTATION TYPE
ZDQT : DEEMED QUOTATION TYPE.
I have created a Quotation by taking ZDQT Doc type and Sales Area : 1000/13/11 and Customer : 11000000(Same Customer for Dom and Deemed sales extended). 20000010(Documnet no)
When i am taking the reference of 200000010 and creating a New Quotation of Doc type (ZFQT) and Sales Area : 1000/11/11 and Copy.
Then Item and customer details able to copy and when i look into Header Sales Area is not changing , it is showing the reference sales area 1000/13/11. Butn't Sales area : 1000/11/11.
*Why the Client is asking such type of reference is ?We have implemented for Cable Manufacturing company and in order to create a Item in Order it requires lot of Configuration/Charateristics as VC (Variant Configuration)is involved and it takes minimum 3-4 mins to create an item.
So is there any alternative solution for this.
Regards,
Tilak.

Shippment cost

Hi All,
We have configuring Shippment at my client site.but they have some unique reuirment for shippment cost.
They are using shippment for stock transfer from plant to depot.
but as per them when we calculate shippment cost in (VI01) shippment cost should not be calculate unless Good receipt confirmation(GR No)-MIGO has done from depot.and they want GR No field should reflect in VI01 intial screen.
In short they want shippment cost should not be post to the account unless Good receipt has done.
They want to restrict shippment cost for GR confirmation
regards
Hemant

Dear Mani,
Normally After checking the Transfer check system will create the Service PO automatically based on the IMG settings.
You can see the Service PO Number in the Service procurement tab (Adjusent to Settlement tab) in the field Purchasing Doc.
I don't think you can assign service PO Manually in the shipment cost document.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.
Edited by: Murali Mohan.Tallapaneni on Sep 18, 2008 7:11 AM

How implement Auto Purchase Order in Transportation Cost Settlement

Hi,Experts,
When Settling the Transportation Cost,I must create PO manually.Can anybody tell me How implement Auto Purchase Order in Transportation Cost Settlement?
Thanks for a lot.
Donald Lo

Dear Donald,
Please go through this SAP link it will help you about Shipment cost settlement process in the transportation.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/93/74413b546011d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Shippment cost document

Hi All
Can anybody help me I am struck in creating Shippment Cost Document.
My Requairement is I want to create Shippment Cost Document with Existing Purchase order and Existing Service Entry Sheet.
We will be having some P O's with some N number of Service Entry Sheets out these we want to select one PO with one SES and create Shippment Cost Document.
Thanks&Regards
Mani.

Hi,
In standard, when shipment cost document is created in VI01, there is no provision to select/choose the PO and service entry sheet. system determines the PO number and automatically creates SES on Transfering the shipment costs.
Check the follwoing BADIs, they may be of some use.
BADI_SCD_CREATE When Generating a Shipment Costs Document
BADI_SCD_CREATE_CHCK For Checks When Creating a Shipment Costs Document
BADI_SCD_PROCESS_CHK For Checks During Shipment Costs Processing
BADI_SCD_PO_SELECT Call for the Purchase Order Item Determination
BADI_SCD_SAVE When Saving Shipment Costs Documents
BADI_SCD_TRANSFER For Transferring Shipment Cost Items
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Sharan

Cost settlement only for assets that have been paid

Dear all,
i need to do, at the end of the month, the cost settlement from wbs to asset only for the the part of asset that have been paid.
I don' t know how to do this using standard sap funcionalities.
Theonly way that we think to use is:
- setlle of the entire wbs
- transfer posting (FI) from asset to wbs of the part that have not been paid.
Some of you can help me?
thanks
Elena

Hello friend,
Because I do not understand your requirement to capitalize from AuC to final asset only only those costs for goods/service that have been paid - I would like to give warning that you may not have the requirement correct.
This would not be your fault, but the fault of the accounting users giving you the requirement is my guess.
Receiving against PO may be MIGO, and then posting the vendor's invoice later on when it's received, is MIRO usually.
The actual payment to the vendor is a subsequent posting known as a check cut. The accounting for a check cut does not create the AuC value, nor does it meet any accounting requirement for capitalization.
The accounting requirement for capitalization in almost all countries would be MIGO. Because we have posted the receipt of goods or services, we now owe a vendor somewhere. The liability will be in your non-specific vendor account, GR/IR which stands for Good Received/Invoice Received. MIRO clears out the amount from your GR/IR account, moving it to your reconciling account in the g/l for a specific vendor sub-ledger account. The check cut then removes specific liability from reconciling account, and removes cash from g/l cash account.
Recognizing that we owe the cost of the goods receipt MIGO, it is already fair and required to capitalize the costs to final assets and commence depreciation expense (assumption you have placed the capital fixed assets into service).
So, neither MIRO nor check cut should delay your capitalization from AuC to final completed assets unless your requirement is different that SAP basic scenario. Regards

Shipment Cost settlement to multiple vendors

Hi team,
When we are calculating shipment cost, with reference to outbound shipments, we have to get the multiple vendors like freight cost settlement to one vendor and insurance will be to the other vendor.
How do we need to map this requirement? We are using SD route.
Regards
Venkat Ramana

Hi Venkat,
If different service agents exist in the shipment cost documents, a
corresponding number of condition lines (with value 0) must be
specified in the purchase order item. These can always belong to the
same condition type (in schema 'Manual') or also to different
condition types (not 'Manual'):
a) Manual condition lines: If the condition type in the schema of
    the purchase order is marked as 'manual', the condition type must
    be created (with value 0) in the purchase order item before the
    goods receipt. If delivery costs are expected from different
    service agents, several non-valuated entries must be generated
    for this condition type. If more condition lines exist than
    required, these are then no longer taken into account. If
    condition lines are missing, the last service agents are not
    settled.
    - Advantage: You only have to define one condition type for the
    delivery costs.
    - Disadvantage: Each purchase order must be processed manually
    before the goods receipt.
b) Automatic condition lines: If the condition lines are to be
    generated automatically for the delivery costs (the condition
    type is not flagged as 'Manual' in the schema), the schema must
    have enough condition types to settle several service agents. If
    more condition lines exist than required, these are then no
    longer taken into account. If condition lines are missing, the
    last service agents are not settled.
    - Advantage: The goods receipt can be carried out without manual
    preparation beforehand in the purchase order.
    - Disadvantage: You must define identical condition types with different names.
Regards, David

Cost Settlement in PM module

Dear All,
While carrying out cost settlement for an order, there is an error comming up "Complete Allocation Structure 'ZP' "
Which say while settlement either the cost element of the component is incorrect or if it is correct then change in the settlement rule.
how can we solve this query ?

HI,
Contact your FICO consultant to check the allocation structure.
There might be a problem with cost element and the allocation structure.
Regards
KK

Outbound delivery deletion with shipment cost settled.

Dears
     I have one question about how to delete one outbound delivery which has one shipment document inside.
Scenarios like:
     we do normal sales order -> outbound delivery -> Picking -> Loading -> PGI -> invoice. and also from outbound delivery to shipment document and shipment cost settled. that means everything is done.
   But next month, the customer said they do not need such goods, they want to return all and take money back. so we need to cancel billing , PGI , and warehouse transactions. as you know , the previous month already been closed. we could not cancel shipment cost settlement . actually, we do not need to cancel it because the shipment is done by 3rd party partner. we need pay the transportation cost.
the problem, is when I use VL02n to delete outbound delivery item, it is not allowed because in document flow, there is one shipment document could not be deleted. but this outbound delivery status is OPEN, it always books some items which we will never delivery.
     is there one can help me about how to delete outbound delivery or how to close it to avoid stock booking ( ATP)?
thanks
jerry W.

hello Jürgen L
thanks for your answer. I fully agree with you. it is just our business user ( specially from warehouse) want to make process simple, so then use this way to cancel billing and PGI, then delete delivery lines. I will push them to use standard process .
thanks again.
best regards,
jerry W.

Periodic cost settlement for production order

Hello All,
Please explain me can we do Periodic cost settlement for production order in discrete manufacturing. If yes, how?
Thanks & Regards,
Alok Tiwari

WIP entry gets passed to accounts if the order is not in DLV or TECO status.
or else variance gets calculated.
Two GLs which gets hit are
Change in stock a/c Dr.
To Inventory Price Difference a/c Cr. or vice versa......
Regards,
Divraj

Cost settlement & yield against the inspection Sample....

Hi there,
I gotta a query related to the cost settlement against the sample drawn for inspection.
Suppose that as per the sample drawing procedure configured for the material for 1000 bars let 1 bars is to be used for the inspection .
Now if that bar cannot be used further then how the cost is settled against the Production order for the inspected bar as during the order confirmation the value entered will be 1000 bars only & bar is consumed in QC...
Second thing is that if the requirement is of 1000 bars then the actual yield is
999 bars..... how the variance is taken care of so that there is no shortage of the material ...........
Thanks
Kaushik

HI,
in the PM order check the settlement parameters. In the allocation structure assigned to the PM order are "assignments" defined. Each assignments contain a "source" (=a number of cost elements) and a "settlement cost element" used for settlement document. Its also possible to settle primary cost element based (means without changing the original cost element during settlement).
best regards, Christian

Shippment cost (VI01)- Settlement date

Hello,
I had recently implemented shipment cost process to the business. As usual I did all the config settings in the development server and tested the output and transport moved to testing server. There in the testing environment I found some interesting issue.
In the shipment cost document line item level u2018settlement dateu2019 is turning out to be in gray mode however under development server it is not turning it into gray mode. I believe there was nothing wrong in the transports moved. I had already cross verified to make sure all the transports moved properly. Can you please diagnose why this is happening?
Also I would like to know through config settings, is there any possibility to keep the settlement date not in gray mode for the line item of shipment cost document(VI01). I checked at item category level but I didnu2019t find anything which related to my requirement. Please advice.
Thanks in advance.

Dear Mani,
Normally After checking the Transfer check system will create the Service PO automatically based on the IMG settings.
You can see the Service PO Number in the Service procurement tab (Adjusent to Settlement tab) in the field Purchasing Doc.
I don't think you can assign service PO Manually in the shipment cost document.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.
Edited by: Murali Mohan.Tallapaneni on Sep 18, 2008 7:11 AM

Material Ledger : Actual Cost settlement to Consumption Accounts

Dear CO Experts,
We are aware that when we run CKMLCP, all variances (in the Price Diff GL Account) due to Material Prices flutuation, diff in Standard & Actual Cost of Production, etc. would finally get settled to Consumption or Stock Account in its appropriate ratios.
Consumption Acount GL is a Cost Element with Cost Category as 1.
There can be cases, when there are diferences in Production Order, due to fluctuations in Prices or Actual consumption is more than standard consumption.
When a Production Order is settled the difference is posted to Price Diff Account.
When a Material Ledger (Actual Costing) is executed, Price Diff Account is targetted to be Zero. The Price Diff is then splitted in Stock & Consumtion Account in its appropriate ratios.
Main Question :
Since, Consumption Acount GL is a Cost Element with Cost Category as 1, what shall be the CO Account Assignment Object, when the ML value is settled to Consumption Accounts.

hi merchant..
   1. Price diff between stnd and act is initially goes to PRD a/c through OBYC setting at the time of GR/Invoiceing/Issue if mat is set as S&3.
   2. In case of mat set as V&2 idially there should not be any diff but may arise some small amount due to "no or less stock qty" at the time of invoicing.
3. When CKMLCP is run these price diff & order settlement diff splitted to cons and stock as you mentioned.
Now your question :
" Since, Consumption Acount GL is a Cost Element with Cost Category as 1, what shall be the CO Account Assignment Object, when the ML value is settled to Consumption Accounts"
    Cons GL is cost element cat 1 for capturing mat mov for Issues to orders/cost centres,oth co obj for primary posting at stnd price.
    Now at the time of CKMLCP run you revaluate the materials and price diff are splitted to cons & stock and goes to mat to calculate act cost (stnd +/- prd).
I think this will give you some light on your issue.
kkumar

Maintenance Cost Settlement on Profitability Segment

Hi, Can anyone tell me, that how can we settle our Maintenance Cost from PM to a Profit Center. In my company there is a Cost receiver defined as Profitability Segment and available in Settlement Rule. Can anyone explain, what does it mean. Are we settling out Maintenance Cost to profit Center directly or somewhere else.

Abhishek Sharma,
Yes, you can settle a Profit Segment.
Have a look at the Settlement Profile assigned to your order type (IMG: Maintain Settlement Profiles).
PeteA

Shippment cost settlement - reg.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for