SM58 Error entries
Hi All,
I find many SM58 entries logged against the program RSM13000 with message 'User is locked. Please notify the person responsible' .
For the FMs 'SWW_WI_CREATE_VIA_EVENT' and 'SWW_WI_CREATE_VIA_EVENT_IBF'
the Workflow_local_100 destination is maintianed.
Request you to advice what needs to be checked to stop such errors.
*similarly against the program RSWWDHEX with message 'R/3 logon failed' for function module 'SWW_WI_STATUS_SET_READY'.
Thanks in advance.
Hi Vijay,
All the problems sound in relation with the user <i><b>WF-BATCH</b></i>, which system automatically creates as you do the workflow customization with the transaction <i><b>SWU3</b></i>.
So first of all verify the creation of this user by consulting the workflow administrator. Also, find the following weblog link written by me, which will talk more about the SWU3 settings -
/people/sapna.modi/blog/2007/02/19/workflows-for-dummies--introductionpart-i
Secondly, for lock issue, first try to delete manually the WF-BATCH lock entries from SM12 transaction and see whether the problem is resolved or not forever.
If it doesn't happen, then you might have to delete the WF-BATCH entry programmatically from SM12 for the given workflow key. Kindly find the following code for this -
* Logic for Deletion of WF Lock for User 'WF-Batch' *
CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUE_READ'
EXPORTING
GCLIENT = SY-MANDT
GNAME = ' '
GARG = ' '
GUNAME = 'WF-BATCH'
TABLES
ENQ = LT_LOCK_LIST.
* Key for the BOR object
LV_INSTID = ZBOR_KEY.
SELECT * FROM SWW_WI2OBJ
INTO TABLE LT_WF_LOCK_ID
WHERE INSTID = LV_INSTID.
SORT LT_WF_LOCK_ID BY CREA_TMP DESCENDING.
* Read the internal table for the Workflow Task
READ TABLE LT_WF_LOCK_ID
WITH KEY WI_RH_TASK = 'ZTASK_ID'
INTO LS_WF_LOCK_ID.
CONCATENATE SY-MANDT LS_WF_LOCK_ID-TOP_WI_ID INTO LV_LOCK_ARG.
READ TABLE LT_LOCK_LIST WITH KEY GARG = LV_LOCK_ARG INTO LS_LOCK_LIST.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
MOVE LS_LOCK_LIST TO LS_LOCK_DEL.
APPEND LS_LOCK_DEL TO LT_LOCK_DEL .
* Delete the log entry for WF-BATCH for the given workflow
CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUE_DELETE'
EXPORTING
CHECK_UPD_REQUESTS = 1
SUPPRESS_SYSLOG_ENTRY = ' '
TABLES
ENQ = LT_LOCK_DEL.
ENDIF.
* End of Logic for Deletion of WF Lock for User 'WF-Batch'
Hope this helps you.
PS If the answer solves your query, plz close the thread by marking it Solved and rewarding each reply.
Regards<b></b><i></i>
Message was edited by:
Sapna Modi
Similar Messages
-
JDBC - XI - IDOC scenario, SM58 error
I am trying to set up a scenario with JDBC -> XI-> IDOC. I seem to get the data, but when I look at it in SXMB_MONI, I get the checkered flag, for the overall status, but a red flag for the outbound status. This led me to SM58 where I see this error "No authorization to send IDocs with message type Z...". It shows the caller ID as being XIAFUSER (which is different from the ID I have created on the receiving SAP system) and is in function module IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS. On XI, I have the RFC (SM59) and Port (IDX1) setup for the receiving SAP system. The receiving system has an ID setup (used in the RFC on XI), has a partner profile, port, logical system, and a RFC to XI setup.
Any ideas on where to track this down? I tried giving XIAFUSER sap_all, and it still fails and this ID does not exist on the receiving system.HI,
Just to inform you that, if any SM58 error, mainly because of IDX1 entry and RFC destination .
So that;s the reason , i just suggested to check this SAP note.
Now you have given SAP_ALL access to test right ? Even you can check with this SAP note-837595
Also check that SM59 (RFC destination) in XI system uses any User ID ? DO not select CURRENT USER option here.. and check it
Regards,
Moorthy -
Getting idoc error - Entry in outbound table not found- in outbound scenari
hi,
while generating idoc for outbound idoc to file scenario - i am getting error
"Entry in outbound table not found" (29 - error in ALE service)
Diagnosis
No partner profile (outbound parameter) could be found using the following key:
/C100/KU//WP_EAN////
This refers to the key fields in table EDP13:
RCVPRN Partner number
RCVPRT Partner type
RCVPFC Partner function
MESTYP Logical message
MESTYP Message code
but already entry has been maintained in partner profiles for the corresponding message.
same setup is working for other message types. pls let me know what might be the problemHi,
Check whether partner name is correct or not in WE20/outbound parameters undoer Logical System.
Regards,
Sreenivas. -
In MIRO screen, if clicked on 'TAX' tab error 'Entry of tax not allowed in
Hi,
In MIRO screen, if clicked on 'TAX' tab error 'Entry of tax not allowed in current account line' is displayed. Message number FF847. What may be the reason for this error message?
Entry of tax not allowed in current account line
Message no. FF847
Diagnosis
If you enter a tax amount in the current account line, the system does not allocate the amount to one tax code, but instead to all tax codes that exist in the document. In this case, the amount needs to be split up using the rule-of-three procedure. The sum of the computed taxes of all tax codes is used as the comparison basis. If each of the computed tax amounts of all tax codes equals zero, the system uses the sum of the tax base values as the comparison basis.
System Response
If the respective comparison basis equals zero, the system issues an error message.
Procedure
Go to the tax screen or tax tab page and enter the appropriate tax amounts for each tax code.Hi,
Please check SAP Note- 1551857 for the same.
Other terms
FF707, FF716, FF796, FF847, FB70, SAPLTAX1
Reason and Prerequisites
There is a program error.
Solution
Implement the program corrections.
When you choose "Cancel" on the tax screen during posting or simulation, the system returns to FB60 or MIRO again.
The message FF 847 on the "Basic data" tab page is suppressed for company codes with jurisdiction codes if no expense items exist.
Hope this will resolve your query.
Regards,
Sandesh Sawant -
Error : Entry 4 not in table EMSEG (system error) in MIGO
Hi All,
I am getting the below error while cancelling the material document in MIGO.
Error : Entry 4 not in table EMSEG (system error)
Please provide any information on the same issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Ashish Dholiyou can only know it after you have read, justified and implemented the notes.
That is your work, it cannot be made by anyone here.
In general, if OSS notes are supposed to fix program errors, then it will usually not harm to implement them, you will get it anyway with the next hotpackage.
if your issue is caused by a program error, then there is no workaround to applying a OSS note to get your issue fixed. -
Inbound Function Module SM58 Error in Outbound R3- XI- file Scenario
I am getting an SM58 error message of "Use IDOC Adapter for FM IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS...." in my R3 system when trying to implement an Outbound R3->XI->file Scenario. This implies that the system thinks I am doing inbound when I am really doing an outbound IDoc to XI. I followed the guides and seem to have everything set up properly.
I also found a closed posting concerning the same error message, but there was no resolution.
My idoc also appears fine (outbound, right ports). To test, I changed my XI rfcDestination to an EDI System rfcDestination and the ORDRSP outbound idoc goes to the edi system as expected.
Any idea why my R3 system thinks I am using IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS?
Thanks in advance!Hi,
I have couple questions before exactly answering your question
What type of data you are trying to send like
1. Master data (Customer master, Vendor master)
2. Transactional data (Sales orders, Purchase orders)
If you are trying to send transactional data then check the partner profile configuration for whom you are trying to create outbound IDocs. Select your partners outbound message type and go to Message Control details tab and check your Process code and corresponding functional module if the function module used is ment for creating outbound Idocs then there should be some other that is causing the problem otherwise I guess this is the problem so you can change the associated process code function module.
Jagadish. -
IDOC Error - Entry in outbound table not found - Status 37
Hello,
we try to generate the IDOC in a Test Tool WE19. I always get the same error "Entry in outbound table not found" - Status 37. I tried already many config changes (Partner, Ports, Distribution Modell...).
The thing is that the IDOC should be sent on external system (non-SAP System) but also the IDOC should be write to file. The external system should later on catch the IDOC and process the data.
I suppose the problem is the fact that we send it to external non-SAP System. I add as Port Data and the source where the IDOC shoud be generated. The Partner that I choose is logical system. However I dont specify the RFC Connection because the file should only be saved and not send directly on the external system. Is it possible or maybe I need to specify the IP-Adress of the external system?
When it works I need to generate the IDOC as service management IW32. I try it with TA IORD. I get the message "rejected". Probably because of the error in the test tool WE19.
I am already fighting on it for many hours...
Thank you in advance
MichaelHi
In we 19
Receiver
Port: A port created in R/3 referencing RFC dest pointing to XI.
Partner no: LS of XI (CLNT100)
Partner Type: LS
Sender
Partner no: LS of R/3 (RD1CLNT500)
Partner Type: LS
Message Type is DESADV
Basic DELVRY05
and i am sending blank idoc for testing.
Regards
Monika -
Release strategy: Tx CL20N Error: Entry 01 does not exist in table T16FS
Dear MM Gurus,
I was designing new release strategy for PR and PO, so I deleted all the previous entries(SPRO) available in SAP. I created my new entries but in the transaction CL20N I got the above mentioned error: "Entry 01 does not exist in table T16FS-Check your entry" . I checked the table T16FS, where the entries were available. It also showed the previous entries I deleted from SPRO.
Refering the SAP note 365604 (version 29, valid from 08.10.2008), I created the deleted entries again so that I could delete them in the required sequence
1. release strategies
2. release indicators
3. release codes
4. release groups
5. class
After deleting the entries in the above mentioned sequence also I am getting the same error in CL20N.
I ran report RCCLZUOB, it shows the entries does not exist.
Please help.
Edited by: Akshay Kurhe on Mar 2, 2009 6:02 AMhi
check this setting
Distribution Using Object Classes -->Maintain Class Types & Maintain Classes -
i have downloaded the trail version of CS6 and run that. it shows the error ' entry point not found"
Your computer does not meet the system requirements. Refer to the tech specs on the product page.
Mylenium -
Hi,
Does anybody know the resolution for the following
In SM58 status text showing "Select one of the install language" and it has failed ?
Any thoughts ?
Please let me know if you need more information
ThanksHey,
SM58 errors occur due to RFC destination, Check SM59 what lang you have chosen (Logon & security- Tab ).
Cheers
Agasthuri -
SM58 Errors due to Work Item/Task
Hello,
we are getting a lot of sm58 error messages related to a workflow task TS00007989 (Error during outbound processing).
All the errors carry the same message "Work item 000000549001: Task TS00007989 locked for instantiation"
What could be the root cause of this issue? Is it possible to resolve this without deactivating the standard workflow task.Hi Mohan,
Its RFC error. Please check the workflow instance using T-code SWI2_DIAG to get details about this error. Also you can contact your BASIS Team for the same to check the connectivity of the system for which these IDOCS get triggered.
Also check the T-Code WE02 to get details about error in IDOC.
BR,
Prakash -
*Error entry no. 20 No clock-out entry*
Hi,
whenever am running time evaluation for employee its giving following msg in PCR TD20
Error entry no. 20 No clock-out entry
01.01.2009 Processing terminated for EE 00000029
Whereas entry for clock out exist in Table TEVEN. m not able understand why is it happeining. There are no overlapping record in any of the 20** IT
Thanks in advance,
NehaHi,
Are you generating quota by schema and you mean when you run time evaluation system shows the error?
In fact for such a shifts which are start from current day and finish next day you should check why system can't understand clock-out is blong to previous day?
You can fix it manually in PA30 or PA61. Open IT2011 and change day assignment "Assignment to previous day (set manually)" (minus character). By this you can fix this case but as I said to fix it for good you should chck your customizing.
For more information have a look at my replies at
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3385975
http://scn.sap.com/message/14176029
Regards,
Omid -
Error entry no. 04 Clock-out cannot be delimited
Hello experts,
I am working in a time evaluation project and I am getting an error in time pair formation, I am using TM00 schemas:
Employee planned working time schedule is from 22:55 (current day) to 06:55 (next day), If employee clocks-out in that interval there is no time pair error:
P01 Clock-in/-out: 22:55 current day
P01 Clock-in/-out: 06:55 next day (previous day indicator is setting automatically)
But if employee clocks-out over 06:55 (just 1 min or more) there is an error (Error entry no. 04 Clock-out cannot be delimited) time pair formation:
P01 Clock-in/-out: 22:55 current day
P01 Clock-in/-out: 06:56 next day or 08:00 next day (should be overtime)
Please help me.
Best regardsHi chamo!!
You can use PDC Processing Statuses parameter A07 Assigning a Time Event to the Current or Previous Day (V_T705B). If the time lapse between the time event and the end of the daily work schedule or the last time event is less than n, the time event is assigned to the previous day.
n must be a positive whole number. n is specified as a three-digit number and is interpreted as follows:
The first digit is the number of whole hours
The last two digits are the industry minutes
Example: 150 means one hour and 30 minutes
Best regards. -
Internal error: Entry in COKA-Buffer not found
Hi,
In FB50 I was trying to post the following entries:
760100 (expense/cost element) Dr. 1000
100000 (petty cash account) 1000
When posting (ctrl+s) the following error appears "Internal error: Entry in COKA-Buffer not found". At this point system stops the transaction and exits from that t.code. On expanding the error the following is displayed :
"Internal error: Entry in COKA-Buffer not found
Message no. KC051
Diagnosis
The system could not find the entry with the following key in the COKA float:
Object number = AO00000000000000108166
Cost element = 760100
Origin group =
System Response
An internal error has occurred. Processing stopped.
Procedure
Notify your system administrator."
We checked the table COKA and the above mentioned object no. was not found. So how is the system displaying this particular Object nu.?
Can someone please help to solve this problem?Hi friends,
we are having the same problem with PA objects in FI transactions. Object PA in COKA is different from object PA in COEP when we are posting.
Internal Error: KC051 Buffer not found.
Issue transactions are: F-02, FBB1, F110,... but curiously transaction F-01 works OK...
Any suggestions please? We don't know what we can do... we've checked all sustitutions and validations FI/CO but we don't find anything.
Thank you in advance.
Regards. -
ERROR : Entries for application 13 still exist in the extraction queue -
Hi everybody,
While modifying extractor (LO Cokpit) I am getting this error.. I have deleted data through t.code LBWQ & LBWG still I am getting this ERROR,
" Entries for application 13 still exist in the extraction queue -> "
and it is givig the Diagnosis as below
Diagnosis
You are not allowed to change the extract structure MC13VD0ITM forapplication 13. This is because unprocessed entries are still presentin an extraction queue of application 13 for at least one client.
If an extraction structure is changed for which there are still openentries in an extraction queue, these entries can no longer be read andthe collective update terminates.
Please help me out..it is urgent...
Thanks in advanceHi Sunita,
Do one things, to fix this problem, go to the BW for that info package, it seems
its already exists..if yes..delete the initialization request from the package
and come back to R/3 try to delete the application 13 and it will allow to make
the changes to the struc.
Hope it helps..
Need further help revert..
Assign points if useful..
Cheers,
Pattan.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi. Did anybody install JSC on a remote linux exporting the X? I want to install it on our department server (my machine has not memory enough) but, although the X windows are correctly exported (xclock works fine) when i try to execute the installer
-
Hi, A few months ago I discovered I couldn't view the body of my Yahoo email anymore when viewed through Firefox or Google Chrome. I'm forced to view email through IE. I don't want to use IE, and prefer your search engine What do I have to do to be a
-
hi all abap editor in ecc 6.0 is having a icon enhancement...wat is the use of tht and how to use it...
-
Hi guys, Let me know if you have experienced the following error in the pending move tranasctions with Back flush process? Message error: Status not applicable for this Locator. Transaction processor error Thanks,
-
When installing DW CS6 I am getting the above error message. I have tried to restart my computer twice as advised to no avail. I then completed the suggested Registry Edit to no avail. The last action was to delete the InProgress Key which was not th