Standard Costing : CK11N (Inconsistent Cost Component Views)

Hi,
I have created the cost sheet with below information:
A) Material
B) + Labour
C) +Indirect Labour (% of Labour)
D) + Utilities
E) + Production overhead (% of Material)
F) Cost of Goods Manufactured (Total of A to E)
G) Admin overhead (% of COGM)
H) Sales overhead (% of COGM)
I) Cost of Goods Sold (F to H)
Also Cost component structure is maintained accordingly with the cost elements applicable to above mentioned components.
When I run the cost estimate for the FG/SFG, cost is calculated in the expected way consindering all the components mentione above and displayed in "Itemisation" View.
But the problem has been in the Cost component view of costing run.
I have activated only three views i.e. Cost of Goods Manufactured , Cost of Goods Sold and Sales and Admininstration Cost.
1. Costs are not appearing under the respective components correctly.
2. Sales and administration cost component is displaying Material cost instead of the overhead
3. Utilities is having very high cost (not the sum of costs appearing in itemisation)
4. Component Material is totally disappeared and not visible.
I request experts to comment on this disparity and suggest the steps that need to be taken for getting the right cost compnent views.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Viswanath

Hi
Check cost elements assigned to structure. For this go to transaction code OKTZ and select your CCS and double click on Assignment Cost Component-Cost element interval.
Srinivas

Similar Messages

Display Dept. amount in Std cost estimate cost component view

Dears,
During implementation of Repetitive manufacturing, my customer Requirement is to have 4 activity types:
1- Utilities : (Elect-water-GAS ... Etc)
2- Labor : (salary - bonus ..Etc)
3- Depreciation : (Depreciation exp)
4- other : like (maintenance .. Etc)
he wants that so he can know this classification of the above costs liek depreciation per material in the standard cost estimate so my question is:
Is it applicable to display the above requirement and using only 2 activity types
Labour and machine
and use the cost component structure to display the above req ?
as an example:
in CK11N : if i switch to cost component view to display the depreciation amount and Etc
Thanks and best Regards,
Ahmed Samir

Salaam Ahmad
You have both choices.
You can go with 4 act types or go with 2 and use costing sheet for the other costs
I will prefer 4 act types
Br. Ajay M

Cost component view German instead of English

When I display product cost estimate with quantity structure. Under the tab costs all the cost component view description show up in German. In our development and test client they show up fine in English. I don't know if this problem has any thing to do with costing at all but I was just wondering if any of you faced this problem and how did you solve the issue. If this is not the forum can you please point me to where should I pose this question.
Regards

Hi NIK83,
When a cost estimate and its itemization is saved in txn CK11N, the text of the items is only written in one language to database table CKIT. So if somebody who was logged on in German created and saved the cost estimate, everybody who displays this cost estimate in CK13N will see German texts. This is the design of the database tables. If there would be texts
for the items in every language installed in your system, the data volume would increase significantly.
However, you can change the layout of the itemization and the cost structure by adding certain columns, e.g. material description, with the English texts. You can save this layout and make it available to all users.
Regards,
Antje

CK13N Cost component view COGM

HI,
Am having CCS item 10 - RM 20- SFG 30 - Labour activity
While creating Standard cost estimate for semifinished goods am getting RM cost & Activity cost separately & correctly.
But if am doing SCE for finished goods the item 20- SFG consumption is not getting effected. Values are posting to item 10 - RM based on the proportionate qty maintained in BOM.
I have assigned the SFG consumption GL a/c in the item 20 but am not getting the value there.
Kindly help us to solve this issue.
Thanks
Christopher.J

I think I'm a little confused about what you are really asking. Your question talks about the cost component view of the cost estimate, but your example looks like you are look interested in booking an accrual for marketing expense at time of goods receipt.
For the cost component view, once you define your cost component you need to assign the appropriate cost elements or origin groups to that component in (OKTZ). So the question is what cost element or origin group will represent the marketing cost and how will those costs be assigned to the cost estimate. One way to do this is by allocating your marketing costs via a costing sheet and then the cost element assigned to the cost component would be the secondary cost element you used for the overhead allocation. If you did that then you should see a value for the cost component when you view the cost estimate in CK13N.
However, back to your example. If looks like you are trying to book an accrual for marketing expense at time of goods reciept. In that case, you can maintain purchasing pricing conditions that can copy into your purchase orders. These condition records would contain the amount of the marketing accrual. It's also possible to map the condition type to an origin group and then you can assign the orgin group to your cost component. So if you maintain condition records for the pricing conditions you can assign them to the marketing cost component and those costs would show in your cost estimate as well.
thanks,

Standard Report for Materials Cost Component Structure - PO Condition Type

Dear experts,
We are using below cost component structure (CCS) for materials:
- Direct materials
- import duty
- import handling
In which, all those above CCS are achieved through below condition type in Purchasing Info Record. When doing the standard cost estimate through costing run, we have successfully grouped all those condition types into their respective CCS. The problem is, while executing the standard report of "result of costing run" (S_ALR_87099930), the sytem groups all those three CCS into CCS "Direct materials" only.
I have tried different standard layouts, but still got no way to show all those CCS separately in the standard report.
Please kindly suggest what approach should i take
Thank you very much
BR, Erwin
@edit
Solved.
Edited by: Erwin Hartono on Nov 16, 2011 9:16 AM

Hi
Check cost elements assigned to structure. For this go to transaction code OKTZ and select your CCS and double click on Assignment Cost Component-Cost element interval.
Srinivas

CK11N alert:"Costing item 00001 is not assigned to a cost component"

Hi,
     When I use CK11N, fill in all the necessary field, there will appear a alert.
      The detail as follows:
Costing item 00001 is not assigned to a cost component
Message no. CK 334
Diagnosis
No cost component is assigned to costing item 00001.
System Response
The costs for the costing item are not shown.
Procedure
Go into Customizing for Product Cost Controlling and check the assignment of cost elements to cost components.
       I have used KA03,KL03,CR03 to checked previous datas, but I find no errors?
What is the problem?

Hi,
Use OKTZ to create cost component structure.
Check for some of these settings also
Configuration:
Define costing sheets
OKTZ create cost component structure
OKK4 Define valuation variant
OKKN Define cost variant
Master Data:
KP26 setup activity rates
CR01 setup work centers
MM01 setup material masters
CS01 setup Bill of Materials
CA01 setup routings
Regards,
Murali

CK13N Break up of Mat,labor,Oh in Cost component view / itemisation differ

Material Costed having an Multilevel BOM.
We had the issue like cost component view and itemization view , did not Match. So higher level material is costed again.
Now The total are almost the same between the Components View and the Itemization View, but the breakdown (Matl, Labor, Overhead) is not the same.
Material 484, Labor14, OH59 as per cost component view .
Material 506 , Labor9, OH43 as per Itemization view.
Now why since it was just re-rolled difference exist in Break down
Regards
Poopandian

Do you have any semi finished procut in between costed material and raw material.
Do not forget cost component view is rolled up to higher level with its detail . For example
for finished produt A = 100 (total cost)
materail SF 80
Labor 20
but detail of material semi finished SF = 80
material RM (raw mat) 60
lanor = 20
Nor For A cost component
material in general = 60
labour = 40
but in itemization of A you can see
material = 80
labour =20

Raw Material Costing with Actual Cost Component Split

Hi All
I have requirement to split inventory RM Value with material component and Freight cost, all config done and looks well if I check at CKM3N cost component view, material cost $100 and Freight $20, I GR the inventory with freight cost, since I'm using actual costing when journal freight cost go to Price Difference account. But after actual costing closing why the system can't split the variance update to freight cost component? is this the standard SAP behaviour?
Please help for the solution
Regards
Luiz

I see that you want to split your material cost and freight cost. you need to check the following:
Is your current standard cost estimate support this structure i.e do you have seperate cost components for RM and Freight.
If not first you need to change cost component structure and as mentioned by owen you to map the purchase condition type to the origin group and cost component structure.
Then system will do the same for the actual costing

How to update only Raw material cost(CK11n) in Material Master ?

Hi Everybody,
My client has a requirement where only raw material costs from the BOM should get updated in Material Master (Accounting 1 view in Standard Price field).
But in Receipe & BOM for the Process Order, the client wants all Packing Materials and activites to be maintained.
Pls help me in this regards,
Ankita

Hi Jagdish,
Let me put it this way to explain you my problem.
When running CK11n,
Total Cost is =
Total Raw Materials used Cost = QTY from BOM * Price from Material Master
+
Total Packing Materials used Cost = QTY from BOM * Price from Material Master
+
Total Utility cost = Qty from receipe * price in KP26
When viewing the cost componenet view in CK11n tcode, I can view the break up as follows
Raw Material Cost = XX rs
Packing Material Cost = XX rs
Overheads = XX rs
Total cost = sum of all above XX rs ( this is the cost which gets updated when realasing price thru t code CK40n)
But my client wants that at time of price relase, system should relase only total raw materil cost as standard price for the Finished Good in Material Master Accounting 1 view.
I hope now you are getting me.
Regards,
Ankita

Cost of Manufacture Cost from CK11N

Hi All
where can I get material cost estimate price for costing varient PPC3.
I check all the tables KEKO ,CKIS AND KEPH
but did not find the cost of goods manufactured "Total costs" in that table could you tell me which field it is ?
Eg CK11N - Enter the material press execute twice and you will see the costs component view how can I get that price and from which field
regards
Piroz

Hi Piroz
i have the same requirement which u have explained.
i need the final cost estimate value of the material, when i give MATNR as input.
if u got the required solution for this issue, can u please post it for me.
i gonna give u the points as soon as i get the solution from u.........
thanx in advance
Shyam

While product costing CK11N error

While using CK11N I am getting following error:
Sr.No.               Error Description                                                                                Msg No
1>     No price could be determined for Material /Batch XXXXXXX/Plant XXXX                                                    465
2>     Cost Component split costed with value zero                    240
3>     No valid source of supply could be found.                         380
4>     Object was not costed                                60
5>     Cost estimate for material XXXXXXX /Plant XXXX is incorrect                                 168
Please help me how to fix above problem.
Thank you.

Check following points,
Probably material might be split valuated,Check price is maintained for all valuation types including header in MM60.
Check price is maintained in info record.
Check type of procurement in MRP2,it will be external procurement - F.
Do product cost estimate using KKF6N.
Check production version is maintained in MRP4 ?
Check throughly all masters vendor,info record & material master.
It will solve the issue.

To add additional cost to specific cst component in cst component structure

Hi All,
We have an issue related to Product Costing.
The requirement is to add 5% additional cost to one specific cost component in cost component structure related to material handling (now coming as variable cost). The assigned cost elements to this cost component have cost element category as 41 (overhead rates). The requirement is to display this 5% additional cost on the single cost component only in cost component split.
If anyone has worked on similar requirement, could you please let me know how to proceed on this.
Thanks in advance for your valuable feedback.
Thanks & Regards,
Darshanjeet Singh Sachdeva

Hi
Use CK74N.. You can add the value you want and also the cost ele of your choice.. Save it in CK74N
Now when you run CK11N, the cost you added in CK74N would get added to CK11N's own cost
br, Ajay M

What are the Standard Reports In Product Costing

Hi,
Can you please suggest me the the Necessary Standard Reports that can be suggest to the client in Product Costing?
Please provide me the TCodes as well.Poings will be assigned.
Thanks
Sunitha

Most of the report that are used at my client site are
CK33                     -Compare Cost estimate.
Ck13n                   - Display Cost Estimate
S_ALR_87099930 - Results of costing run
CKAPP01            - Display Materials to be costed.
CK80_99              - Cost Component Split.
Ck88_99              - Partner Cost Component Split.
CK84_99             - Itemization.
As we also handle Month end close we use
KKAQ                   - Display WIP
S_ALR_87013127 - Display variances

How to get Cost element for a component in co03 cost analysis report

Hi,
I'm using table COSP to find the quantity for a production order component. However, I need to identify the cost element first to get the unique data. In CO03 cost analysis report, there is cost element for the component. Does anyone know how to get it ?
Thanks.

CSKA stores the basic info about the cost element
There is no data in CSKB.
I'm trying to use different tables to get the cost element.
AUFK, AFKO, AFPO, RESB, ...but no luck...

Standard extractor for shipment cost information(appl.08)

I need some clarification on "08" extractors.
We are using BW30B with PI2003.1 on the SAP enterprise side. We need to transfer the shipment cost details like cost centre, business area, G/l account etc? We have shipment cost documents which have the accounting/cost center field KOSTL shown as 'Cost Center'='10-0HAD'; business area (field GSBER) as 1010. But the data is not getting transferred!
What we did was using Tx LBWE, the extract structure MC08TR0FKZ has been enhanced with the field KOSTL (MCCOMVTRLP KOSTL Cost Center). Similarly in the data source 2LIS_08TRFKZ (Shipment Costs at Delivery Item Level) shows the field KOSTL. In the data source this field is not hidden. In the table
ROOSFIELD for the data source 2LIS_08TRFKZ, the field KOSTL is present.
This has field "SELECTION" as value "P". Same for field KOKRS & GSBER!
We are getting the fields MATKL, MTART , PRCTR properly populated since
the extract structure and data source was enhanced with these fields
also and in Table ROOSFIELD, they also have field "SELECTION" as value
"P".
What are the possible reasons for above? am I using the wrong structure or such details cannot be transffered using standard means? What exactly is meant by "SELECTION" as value "P" in table ROOSFIELD for a particular field say KOSTL.
regards

Hello,
you should check the function module MCEX_UPDATE_08 if there is the internal table MC08TR0FKZ_TAB enhanced with your fields, because there this table is filled for the extract structure MC08TR0FKZ with the communication structures MCCOMVTTK, MCCOMVTTS, MCCOMVFKP, MCCOMVTRFKZ, MCCOMVTRLK and MCCOMVTRLP. Debbuging this function module will help to find out if your field is filled or not.
If it´s not filled i think it is easier to make an append on the extract structure and fill the field in the customer exit. Otherwise you have to modify the function module mcex_update_08 or the function modules SD_SHIPMENTS_SAVE, VTRBW_SD_SCD_SAVE or VTRBW_SD_SHIPMENT_DATA_SAVE.
Markus

Standard Costing : CK11N (Inconsistent Cost Component Views)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for