Standard order not created

While creating standard order, following error is coming:
"Period indicator 1 (2,3,4,5) is not defined."
Please suggest me the path as well.
Thank you,
Kunal

Dear Kunal,
This is my guess
Are you using batch  and Self Life Expiration date related material in the sales order then
Go to O02K transaction check the activation mark  for periods 1,2 and 3
Then try
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Similar Messages

  • Sales order not created using BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2

    HI,
    I have used the bapi BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2 to create sales order. I have passed the parameters, doc_type, sales_org, distr_chan, division, partn_role, part_numb and material.
    It displays back the message as
    sales_header_in createds,
    sales_item_in created,
    sales document not yet complete : Edit data.
    Standard Order 135428 has been saved.
    But when i check the same standard order in VA03 ( or vbak ), its not present.
    I have also run BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT, to commit work. But still cant figure out.
    Any suggestions plzz...
    regards,
    Taj

    I am able to create the sales order when i am entering these details in VA01. I mean the sales document type and othr details.
    But when i pass the same parameters in bapi. This doesnt happen. Is there any thing more that needs to be passed.

  • Purchase order not create in sus

    Dear customizer,
    Ihave implemented a plan driven procurement with sus (r/3-sus) scenario,we have a problem when we transfer idoc from r/3 to sus.In sus sistem give me this error message
    "An error occured within an XI interface: Exception occurredE:BBP_PD:BBP_PD:051 -No address found for partner function type Sold-to Party E:BS:002 -"Create" is not allowed (SUS Purchase Order 4500000006 )CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CP; Include: CX_BBP_BD_ERROR===============CM002; Line: 57</FAULT_TEXT>"
    I hope in your answer.Thank best regards.
    Pernasetti Alessio

    Hi,
    Please check the following things.
    Check whether the roles delivered by SAP meet your requirements. If not, you can create new roles and assign transactions to them. We recommend that you copy standard roles and tailor them to your requirements.
    All users assigned to a respective role are then allowed to carry out the transactions. If required, you can refine the authorization check on the tab page Authorizations.
    Standard SAP Single-roles
    SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_PURCHASER (for purchasing administrators - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_BIDDER (for bidders - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_DISPATCHER (for dispatchers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_INVOICER (for invoicers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR (for order processors - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_MANAGER (for managers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_AGENT (for service agents - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
    If you want to use SAP Supplier Self-Services, proceed as follows:
    1. Select one of the following single roles:
    SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_PURCHASER
    SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_VENDOR
    SAP_EC_SUS_BIDDER
    SAP_EC_SUS_DISPATCHER
    SAP_EC_SUS_INVOICER
    SAP_EC_SUS_MANAGER
    SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR
    SAP_EC_SUS_PRODUCT_MANAGER
    SAP_EC_SUS_SAR_PROCESSOR
    SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_AGENT
    SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_MANAGER
    2. Choose Change Roles.
    3. Choose the Personalization tab page.
    Note: The personalization applies to all roles, meaning the user can also create his own roles, for example copying the delivered SAP SUS roles. He can tailor these roles to his requirements by changing the SUS-specific attributes (BBP_SUS_ROLE_ATTRIBUTES).
    1. Select the entry BBP_SUS_ROLE_ATTRIBUTES (SUS-specific role attributes).
    2. Choose Change values.
    A dialog box for maintaining SUS-specific roles appears.
    3. If required, perform the following steps:
    If the role should be displayed in the SUS User Management (UM) and should be able to be assigned to the relevant user by the supplier administrator, set the indicator to display the role in SUS UM.
    If the user should be displayed as a service agent for the purchaser, set the Service agent indicator.
    If you want to define the user as an SRM administrator, set the SRM administrator indicator. The user is then authorized to change all supplier data.
    If want to assign the role SUS administrator automatically to the user during registration, set the SUS administratorindicator.
    Sets the relevant indicators if you want users to receive the following notifications: Notification If Purchase Order Not Opened, Notification If Purchase Order Response Is Missing, Notification If ASN Is Missing, Notification If ConfirmationIs Missing, Notification If Invoice Is Missing,
    Award the points for the help.
    BR,
    Vijay Mittal

  • SRM Purchase Order not Created Automatically

    SRM 7.0 Extended Classic Scenario:
    Issue:  When creating a standard shopping cart in SRM the Purchase Order is not created in SRM (or in R3).  Eventhough the shopping cart is fully approved and has a vendor assigned.  The overall shopping cart status remains approved,the line items status shows 'item in transfer process'.  Otherwise there are no errors in the application monitor.  Nothing appears in table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB
    Considerations:  Everything is working fine for limit shopping cart, the PO gets created automatically and the SC has status follow-on document created.
    Also, this was working fine for standard orders, it seems that support pack 7 or 8 broke this functionality, yet I do not see any notes regarding the issue.  Any ideas on what controls the automatic PO generation or how it could work for limits but not standard SC's would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Matt
    Edited by: Matt Joseph on Nov 17, 2010 10:27 AM

    First of all PO should be created then you can see entry in doc table.
    u Note 1480994 - How to process a shopping cart with status I1111?
    see SAP treatment and some work around..
    Symptom
    Shopping Cart is stuck in status I1111 (Item in transfer process).
    Other terms
    Application Monitor, I1112, I1111, Monitor Shopping Cart
    Reason and Prerequisites
    This is a FAQ note, which shows how to treat such Shopping Carts.
    Solution
    Shopping Cart status I1111 (Item in transfer process) is a temporary status, which means that shopping cart is being processed in order to generate a follow-on document.
    However, it is possible that status I1111 becomes permanent and, in this case, shopping cart status is inconsistent.
    There are some procedures to be considered when shopping cart is stuck in status I1111.
    Report BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED is available to change the status of the shopping cart item from I1111 to 'Error in transmission' (I1112) and later on, it is possible to retransfer this shopping cart from Application Monitor/Monitor Shopping Cart transactions.
    Note 441768 provides more information about this report.
    However, BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED works in a time stamp. BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED will check shopping carts created after date specified in table BBP_CONTROL.
    To check this information, go to SE16 -> BBP_CONTROL and as input parameter provide the report name. Here you will see the last date that report has been run.
    If you have a shopping cart in status I1111 which is older than date specified in table BBP_CONTROL, you have to change manually the time stamp specified in such table. You have to specify an older date (before shopping cart creation).
    Doing this, you can run report BBP_ALERT_SB_NOTTRANSFERED and cart in question will have status I1112 assigned.
    Once status I1112 is assigned to shopping cart, you can retransfer it from Application Monitor (BBPWEBMONITOR transaction in SAP_GUI) or Monitor Shopping Cart in the web.
    To transfer Shopping Carts from BBPWEBMONITOR, some settings need to be done.
    Following notes should be considered:
    550044
    FAQ Alert monitor RZ20 does not show any alerts
    396102
    BBP Alert monitor RZ20 does not work
    387701
    The Shopping Card are not transfered after "resubmit"
    According note 387701, workflows WS10000214 and WS10000215 have to be activated. One of them is to delete shopping cart item using Application Monitor and the other one is to resubmit the cart. Then, once this settings are done, you can retransfer I1112 carts from Application Monitor.
    If all settings are done and you have a cart with status I1112 that it is not appearing in Application Monitor, report BBP_ALERT_SC_STATUS_ERROR is available, which checks the carts in status I1112 and put them in the Application Monitor, in order to allow you to transfer them again. Note 631513 explains about this report.
    Additional notes to be considered in this scenario:
    1159609
    Transfer function does not create local purchase orders
    1233037
    BBP_MON_SC: Shopping cart transfer ends in status I1111
    1040878
    Cannot transfer shopping carts with status I1112
    Header Data
    Release Status: Released for Customer
    Released on: 09.08.2010  16:04:09
    Master Language: English
    Priority: Recommendations/additional info
    Category: Consulting
    Primary Component: SRM-EBP-SHP Shopping Cart
    Secondary Components: SRM-EBP-APM Application Monitors
    Affected Releases
    Release-Independent
    Related Notes
    1233037 - BBP_MON_SC: Shopping cart transfer ends in status I1111
    1159609 - Transfer function does not create local purchase orders
    1040878 - Cannot transfer shopping carts with status I1112

  • Transfer Order not created while performing GR for Production order

    Hi, I am facing a problem while recieving stock from a production order. The system does not create a transfer requirement or a TO.
    Let me give you a brief background.
    This is a new functionality introduced in ECC 6.0 for working with kanban in WM.
    Supply area is created for WM location.
    Control cycle is created for material, supply area. Warehouse, storage type and Bin is maintained in control cycle record. When the GR is done for production order material is recieved in this bin.
    1) Now when the Kanban is set empty a production order is automatically created.
    2) Once the production order is confirmed the material automatically shows up in the bin.
    A material document is created which shows IM movement type 101 and WM movement type 103. Also in material document Immediate auto TO checkmark is blank.
    3) *PROBLEM* - System does not create a TR or a TO. the material automatically shows up in the Bin. How can we enable an auto TR and TO creation.
    Following are the settings which I have already checked:
    1) In IMG, WM movement type 103 has auto TO indicator set.
    2) IM-WM interface for 102 movement type and 103 movement type is maintained.
    The main problem is: Although the material document displays WM movement type 103 and the stock lies in WM bin, System never created a Transfer requirement or a Transfer order.
    I would really appreciate if anyone can help me in this.
    Thanks

    Hi Mike,
    I do not know this function in SAP, so these are just my ideas:
    1.
    System does not create a TR or a TO. the material automatically shows up in the Bin.
    I think it's a normal SAP behaviour. If you do GR against a PO the quant(s) will appear in interim storage bin w/o TO. The TO is to move the quants from one bin to another, but in this case the quant comes from 'nothing' and arrives at the bin.
    If you make confirmation and consume the components refering to a PrdOrd, the components will disappear w/o TO from storage type 100 + dynamic bin, because there's no TO that could move them from dynamic bin to 'nothing'.
    So, these 'movements' are to change the WM stock level and TOs are not designed for this.
    2.
    There's difference between auto creation of TO and immediate TO creation. Please check what SAP help says in case of TOs for outbound deliveries:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/f8406c4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    3.
    Now when the Kanban is set empty a production order is automatically created.
    So, if you remove the stock from the Kanban it triggers the creation of a PrdOrd. This is very logical in a Kanban system because it is a pull system. but your problem is not this, it's clear.
    If you just created an automatic TO and would remove the stock from Kanban-bin, a new PrdOrd would be generated, and so on. As many times you remove the stock a new PrdOrd is created and this might be the reason why no TO is crated automatically. In this case this would be a push system and not kanban system.
    I do not know this process but if we concentrate only on the pull system, maybe this Kanaban is to store the FG until an event (e.g. shipment) should trigger the stock removal from this bin. (just my assumption)
    Please try to mark the TR creation for the movement type w/o auto / immediate TO and tell us the result (whether you get the TR if you confirm the PrdOrd).
    Regards,
    Csaba

  • Purchase Order not created for a Shopping Cart

    We have a few Shopping Carts created in SRM which did not transmit as PO to our backend R/3 system. This happened because our R/3 system went down for a couple of hours and the Shopping Carts were created during this time. We tried to submit these Shopping Carts through the Application monitor later and the SRM system gave a message "Processed Successfully". However, POs for these Shopping Carts were not created and the Shopping Carts have a status of "Item in transfer process".
    The Shopping Carts have already got a PO number assigned to them through the SRM system. However these PO's have not been created in the backend R/3 system
    We are struggling to find the failed RFC calls with the help of BASIS so that we can possibly reprocess them. Alternatively we are also looking for a way to retrigger the PO creation for these Shopping Carts.
    I need ideas to resolve this issue.
    Many thanks in advance.
    Susmit

    Not sure if you received an answer or not, but this is what we have had to do in the past:
    1.  Run BBP_PD for the shopping cart to see what the purchase requisition number will be on the backend system.  The requisition number will still be provided even if it fails to transfer to the backend.
    2.  Run FM BBP_PD_SC_RESUBMIT.  The object key field will be the requisition number; the object ID field will be the shopping cart number.
    Hope this helps.
    Monique Stephens

  • Standard network not creating project and WBS automatically

    Hi,
    I have a standard network with a standard WBS assignment at BOTH header and activity levels.
    I created a link to a material in CN08 with this standard network.
    Assembly processing has been configured.
    When creating a sales order, entering the material... the network create screen appears and the system requests a WBS element.
    At this point the system should have created the WBS element.
    When I insert an existing active WBS element as a test..., the system message indicates that the network is already assigned to a Std WBS element.
    Why is the system not using this assignment to create a project and WBS element form the standard structure?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    As a test...
    I've removed the linking of the material and standard network in CN08 - and the system now displayed a screen asking for standard network details.
    I create the material and standard network link again in CN08 - and I'm back to the original issue of the network create screen appearing, but the WBS field is blank. The system is not generating the WBS.
    So - the system is recognizing the link of the material entered in the sales order and the standard network via CN08. But its not using the Standard WBS used in the standard network AND CN08 setup....
    Note: The Std WBS has the planning and  billing indicator ticked.
    Once again, when creating the sales order, I get the network create screen asking for a WBS element. If I insert an existing WBS element I get the message below. The issue is - I know the standard WBS assignment exists, why isn't the system generating a new operative WBS at this point?
    An assignment to a standard WBS element already exists
    Message no. CN044
    Diagnosis
    You have created a network by copying from a standard network. The standard network is assigned to a standard WBS.
    However, at the same time, you have made your own assignments to WBS elements.
    System Response
    When you manually make assignments to WBS elements, the system does not necessarily take the asignments in the standard stuctures into account.
    Procedure
    When you call up the function replace standard WBS or when you save the network you decide whether the manually created WBS assignments or those fronm the standard structures are copied.

  • Regarding sales order not created in xml file format

    Hi Friends,
                       I have the xml file,I sort the xml file alphabetically on material master codes, WHen program try to create the sales order by using this xml file through call transaction method, the line item numbers does not matches with the line items of xml file.
    I want same sequence.Please suggest me..
    Best Regards,
    SHialpa.

    HI Divya,
    Have u uninstalled Acrobt Reader from your system???
    Regards
    Manoj S

  • Purchase order not created for correct item in WGSREQ

    Hi Experts,
    When we use inbound Idoc type WGSREQ in Retail, with 2
    items for example, where the one item is incorrect, to create
    a purchase order, the system incorrectly does not generate a
    document for the correct item.

    Dear Plamen,
    Check following points
    (a) Article master listed or not for your Store / DC
    (b) Info record is there or not?
    (c) Check Vedor master extended to relevant purchase organization or not?
    Hope this info will be useful.
    Regards,
    Muralidhara

  • Third Party Sales: Automatic PO (Purchase Order) not created.

    Dear All,
    I am Implementing thirdparty business process where goods are directly moved from vendor to my customer.
    As per my customer requirement I want to create Automatic PO for the Purchase requisition created from Sales order.
    For this I have done the following settings:
    Marked vendor relevant for Automatic PO.
    Marked Material relavent for Automatic PO
    Marked Sales Item Category relavent for Automatic PO.
    While I saved my sales order Purchase requision was created and system unabel to create the Purchase order automatically. If you encounter this situvation please share your views.
    Thanks & regards

    Hi
    In third party you will not be able to create automatic PO
    The schedule line category CS settings in VOV6 order type NB, MM item category 5 and account assignment category settings as X and in VOV7 for TAS create automatic PO ticked will ensure PR creation only and not PO
    As suggested by the other friend you need to run t code ME59N or ME59  for automatic PO creation but certain condition to be met
    1) In the Purchasing View of the material master data, the "Autom. PO" field must be clicked;
    2) In the Purchasing View of the Vendor Master Data, the "Automatic Purchase Order" field must be clicked;
    3) The Outline Agreement or Purchasing Info Record shall be maintained which will allow the automatic copying of unit price and other conditions into PO;
    4) The Source List shall be maintained for the nominated vendor which was shown in either the Outline Agreement or Purchasing Info Record.
    You have to run ME59N transaction  manually or schedule this as  a background job
    Regards
    Raja

  • Standard Network with Standard WBS not creating the project

    Hi,
    I've got existing Network templates set up for various company codes. The std networks are linked to std wbs elements. This creates a full project structure when coping the standard network in CJ20N.
    However, on an existing company code and plant, I am creating a network template with std wbs assignment, the point at which the other networks jump to the WBS create screen to replace WBS / Proj numbers etc... is NOT HAPPENING. The system immediately asks for a OPERATIVE WBS to be entered.
    This company code specifically requested in the past that that their users only use operative WBS elements. Question: Where is it possible to set this restriction for a specific company code / org unit so the std network ignores the std wbs assignment and requests an operative WBS entry?
    Thanks
    Kru

    Hi Krushan,
    I am not clear what you need here?? Is it that you want to remove the check which is asking for a Operative WBS instead of standard for a particular company code?
    My guess would be to check for any enhancements done for CJ01 tcode, using SMOD or CMOD.
    Hope it helps you.
    Cheers
    Sammar

  • Import order not creating internal sales orders for some orgs

    Hi,
    We are getting one issue in UAT instance. The details are as below -
    1. Created Sales Orders in all 7 orgs.
    2. Ran ASCP plan
    3. planned orders got auto released in all orgs.
    4. Corresponding Internal requisitions got created in all orgs.
    5. Ran 'Create Internal Orders' from each org.
    6. Ran 'Order Import' from BE org as all the IR's were sourced from BE as per sourcing rules.
    7. Issue is that out of 7 orgs, in 2 orgs, DK and SE, the internal sales orders didn't get created and order import gave error. I am attaching the error log below.
    For other 5 orgs, ISO got created successfully and we performed picking/shipping and receiving as well for these 5 orgs.
    Any help will be most welcome.
    error log is -
    Order Import Concurrent Program
    Concurrent Program Parameters
    Validate Only: N
    Order Source: 10
    Order Ref:
    Sold To Org Id:
    Sold To Org:
    Change Sequence:
    Performance Parameter: Y
    Trim Blanks: N
    Operation:
    Number of Instances: 0
    Debug Level: 0
    Request Id: 6891
    Org Id: 2453
    Failed to perform Action Request BOOK_ORDER
    Failed to perform Action Request BOOK_ORDER
    Failed to perform Action Request BOOK_ORDER
    No. of orders found: 2
    No. of orders imported: 0
    No. of orders failed: 2
    Source/Order/Seq/Line Message
    10/1046001536//2 User-Defined Exception in Package OE_SCHEDULE_UTIL Procedure Load_Results_from_rec
    10/1046001536//2 ATP Process resulted in no data
    10/1046001536//2 User-Defined Exception in Package OE_SCHEDULE_UTIL Procedure Load_Results_from_tbl
    10/1046001538//2 User-Defined Exception in Package OE_SCHEDULE_UTIL Procedure Load_Results_from_rec
    10/1046001538//2 ATP Process resulted in no data
    10/1046001538//2 User-Defined Exception in Package OE_SCHEDULE_UTIL Procedure Load_Results_from_tbl
    End of Order Import Concurrent Program

    Try running the Order import from a responsibility where the profile "OM: Override ATP flag" is set to YES at that responsibility level..

  • Acrobat X Standard does not creates hyperlink from Visio 2003 files ?

    I am workin in a big company (5000+ employees) and we just migrated from Windows XP to Windows 7 with Office 2010 and from Acrobat Professional to Acrobat X standard
    I am still using Visio 2003 (this is not migrated yet to Visio 2010), and I am not able anymore to generate pdf-files from Visio files with Hyperlinks!
    For excel files it works fine.
    What do we need to do? is there an extra Visio (2003) Add-In module needed for Acrobat X, or do we need to purchase another Acrobat version?
    Please Help!

    Should you submit a use/business need to have the company IT group install Acrobat Pro another reference to add to what Bernd provided is at:
    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/333/333504.html
    Scroll down to the information for MS Visio.
    You will observe that for Vision 2010 (which you'll most likely be migrated to) you must have the PDFMaker asociated with Acrobat Pro X (for 32-bit only - no support for 64-bit Visio).
    Be well...

  • Approval code on credit card sales order not created when order is booked

    Hi,
    Can anyone help me on this issue.
    when a sales order is entered using payment type of credit card and selected credit card number and line details.The approval code did not generate after sales order is booked.
    Thank you

    duplicate thread in financials.

  • Instance of Purchase order not Created

    Hi Floks,
    We are trying to change the Quantity of PO item using user exit J_1I7_MIGO_SAVE during the MIGO. We are calling BAPI_PO_CHANGE,but it is returning an error message " Instance 4400000245 of object PurchaseOrder could not be changed ". Can anyone help us in solving this error.
    Can we use the bapi in the above user eixt or not.
    Regards,
    Suresh.

    I believe u r trying to chnge the PO when it is already being processed by MIGO transaction.
    Mayb dats y the error message.
    Try to change the Quantity using the BAPI in standalone mode through se37.
    Edited by: Kanwardeep Singh Gill on May 25, 2010 6:15 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Print program of the standard tcode

    Hi Expert, I am looking into the tcode F.27, so can you please tell which standard sap script is used in this transaction ? Thanks.

  • No data in Multiprovider Query

    Hi, I have a query defined on a Multiprovider. When i execute the query, i do not get any data. I checked both ODs on which this Multiprovider is built. Both the ODS have data. What could be the reason. Thanks.

  • Audio does not encode when importing MPEGs

    Hello, I am working in Flash 8 for the Mac. I am trying to import an MPEG file but it does not give the ability to encode the audio track. The video file does have an audio track and I was able to import this very same file last week with success. As

  • Suddenly using too much data?

    Hi everyone, I have had my iphone 5 for over a year. For the first couple of months I had problems with using too much data but eventually learned it was my email causing the issues (it was updating automatically). Fast forward this past Christmas. I

  • Publishing site and wingding font wont show?

    hello all i am working on a site and want to use a letter from the wingdings font collection. when i publish the site though the wingding does not show up, but rather its traditional substitute (in this case a J) is there a way around this or am i ju