Static iview - should not run query

In SAP NetWeaver 7.0 (2004s) I am trying to create an iview which does not execute the report when opened, that is it should not target the database or the OLAP cache.
When I build the document from a KM document/format MHTML I encounter a pop-up window with a tmp file extension which is not satisfactory, else if I use HTML the report is returned unformatted.
The intention is to place the Iview into a dashboard.
As expected, if I publish directly to the portal the iview executes the report by accessing the database or OLAP cache everytime.
I suppose I am after something similar to how the reporting agent worked with 3.x tools.
Does anyone know the best way to develop a static Iview.

Hi
903 and 905 are specific to company not SAP standard. Difficult for forum to comment. Why ur company is not using 103 and 105? Normally in standard SAP accounting entries happenes after 105/905. You need to check your quiry. even 103/903 updates EKBE table. You need to pick from there and calculate open PO based on that. In standard ME2M with selection parameter WE101 will do this. You can configure similar to WE101 in below config with your requirement in case if you wish to use standard report
spro>MM>purchasing>reporting>maintain purchasing list-->selection parameter
Regards
Antony

Similar Messages

In detail section Static Text should not be repeat.

hi.
i need a small Requirement.
in detail section i put one field this is coming from data base.
beside i put one static text like something.
but something static text is repeating based on record set in detail section like
something    value1
something    value2
something     value3
but i dont want to repeat something, only first line i need to put
like
something valu1
                value2
                value3
i dont want to put report section.
i need to put same line at detail section....

there's a couple of ways to do this:
a) right click on the something field and choose Format Field > go to the Common tab and then select Suppress if duplicated
b) or you may wish to go to the Insert menu, choose Group, and then choose your field that contains the something. then you can right click on the Group Header name at the left of the report designer, choose Section Expert, and then choose Underlay Sections.

Should Safari run as fast on a wireless network as my imac does?

I appear to be connected to my airport network but it seems as slow as dial-up.

I doubt it. The main reason is that your iMac has a nice big processor (maybe 1.8GhZ or more). The iPhone has a processor that is only 700MhZ (which is still really big for a cell phone).
I would say that no, it should not run quite as fast, although it should not be painfully slow either.
I hope this helps!

Spell Check - iView should be divine

Hi Guys,
Thanks to the folks who saw the needs of the SAP user and developer community and put together the SDN. Great job.
Now, in regards to the Spell Check... should iView really come up as a spelling error? Or is it that iView really should be renamed to divine? I mean iViews are good but <i>divine</i>?
Don't ask what I'm doing on SDN at 3am on Christmas day.. Its obvious, I'm waiting for santa to come and update the spell checker!
Merry Christmas.
Cheers
Daniel

Happy New Year Daniel,
iView should not be divine. We actually have a file with all the SAP Terms (all 80.000 of them), but it's currently a manual process to load them one by one.
Other things have higher priority, but it is on the list and we will get to it soon, or so I hope.
All the best, Mark.

Query is not running after one table exceeds certain records, any limit?

I have a production database and a reporting database. Production is on version 9.2.0.5 where as Reporting is on 9.2.0.3. I had a query which uses Gl table which grows every month. The query use to take almost same time both in Production as well as Reporting. After the table grew in last couple of months. I observed the query just hangs up in production where as it continues to run in Reporting. Is it the orcale version which makes any difference for the query not to run in prodcution when Gl table had 27 million rows as against 25 million rows a couple of months of ago? Any help is appreciated.

user5846372 wrote:
If I use the gl table which was populated until two months ago having less than say 25.2 million rows, the query runs in 2 minutes. If I use the current gl table having current data (total of say 27 million rows) then the query does not even run. From the current gl table if I delete about 2 million records making it 25 illkion rows then the query runs. So I was wondering whether it is the oracle version which makes this difference.Explain your logic that says that after the queries run successfully on different versions, the version difference is now somehow causing the problem - and not the fact that what did change since the last successful run was the the data volumes....
As for "+the query does not even run+" - it does. Simply that you do not have a clue what it is doing and thus no means to diagnose the problem. And then jump to the conclusion that the version difference is somehow to blame.
WHAT is that query doing when it seems to "hang"? (it very likely does not hang at all, and is simply very busy with I/O or being blocked from accessing a resource it needs)
Have you looked at the events and wait states of the query? Have you looked, as Daniel already suggested, at the execution plan?
You cannot and should not attempt to diagnose a problem, without understanding the problem. If you have no idea what the problem is, how can you simply jump to the conclusion that "+oh, it must be the version difference+"!?
You can only solve a problem by understanding it. It is that simple. So first understand what the query is doing and why it seems to hang BEFORE you attempt to diagnose and solve it.

V$session_longops not displaying a long running query

Hi,
There is a certain query that runs as a part of a stored procedure which when run takes about 1 and half hours to get completed and there is a hint in this query to use certain indexes on few tables.
This time was unacceptable as it was much much longer than what it should have taken so I tried to monitor it through v$session_longops using the following query
select * from v$session_longops where time_remaining > 0
It shows no rows selected but the query is still running.
When I changed the hint in the query to use the full table scan on these tables instead of the indexes it began to show up on the v$session_longops and it took like only 15 mins for the procedure execution to get completed.
My questions are two fold
1) Why did the first time with the Hint on the indexes not show up on v$session_longops with time_remaining > 0 and why did it show up only when i did a full table scan?
2) Secondly is'nt a scan on a table faster using indexes if the index has unique values on the columns we are trying to get data from than the Full Table Scans. And if so then why is it behaving differently in this case.
Thanks a lot in advance for any answers/suggestions

1. v$session_longops only reports long running operations. The CBO assumes that the index scan is a tiny operation (nested loop joins), hence it is not displaying the query, but when you have a full table scan, the CBO assumes this to be a long operation, and hence it is visible in v$session_longops.
2. Allow me to quote from
"http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:17968334624783495563::NO::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID,F4950_P8_CRITERIA:9422487749968"
"full scans are not evil, indexes are not good"
"full scans are not evil, indexes are not good"
"full scans are not evil, indexes are not good"
Click that link for more information. :)
The gist of it is, your CBO is smart, and hence generating a better plan than when you force it to use indexes. Yes, the plan has full table scans, but that is not a crime. What you can do is use optimizer parameters - "optimizer_index_cost_adj" to tune for a better performance, but you should not force an index unless you are sure that the index gives you a lower cost.
You could paste the plan for you queries with and without hints and also paste the optimizer hints - show parameter optimizer.

Process order should not take part in MRP run

Hello Colleagues
I looking for a way how to exclude not released process orders (we have PP-PI) from MD04 report. Not released process order should not take part in MRP run. I was trying to do it using OPJJ for availability check 02 and checking rule PP but I was not able to get result. Could you please help, probably there are other settings?
Best Regards
Eduard

Hi,
Settings in OPJJ will take effect only when you create or release process orders.
As a work around you can try to exclude process order is
1. Create a Storage location and make it not relevant for MRP-OMIR
2. In Material master for the material in MRP assign storage location MRP as 1 (exclude storage location stock)
3. Create the process order, in the GR tab enter the storage location (not MRP relevant)
In the MRP run it will not take the process order into account.
After releasing change the storage location to the normal sotrage location.
In this process flow, the control is with the storage location.
Check it in your sandbox.
Thanks,
JK

Order reservation should not get planned in mrp run

Hello friends,
Actually for a finished material i have created one production order by CO01.Because of it for semi finished material system created order reservation.I dont have any stock of semi finished material.Now i want while running the mrp run system should not planned this Order reservation of semifinished material.For these in configuration of availability check (Scope of check T.C OPJJ), I made the settings that system should not consider reservation (i deactivated the tick for include reservation) and for include depend reservation , i selected Donot check.And all these settings i made in checking group 02 and checking rule PP.After doing all these settings than also system is considering the order reservation for semifinished material and generating the planned order for it.
Do i need to do any other configurations?
Thanking you guys in advance.

Hi Jitendra,
Checking Control (OPJJ) has no relation with MRP.It is useful in the case of Plan and Production / Process Order only to find out Missing part.
Now come to MRP again.
You have a choice of only 3 type of stocks to include or exclude them during MRP run while rest of the things like (PO,PR,Reservation etc are consider by default)
Go to OPPQ and after selecting Plant go to Available Stock.You will find that options,
- Stock in Transfer
- Block Stock
- Restricted Stock.
And one more thing Reservation is not a available stock but its one kind requirement and if there is no stock then system will activate the Planning file entry and during next MRP run it will generate Planning proposal also.
Regards,
Dhaval

Payment run - should not clear the open item but should post payment doc

Hi Gurus,
Can you please help me , on how to acheive like when payment run F110 post the payment doc it should not close the open item rather keep that open item as open item , but hsould be be paid by payment doc posted through payment run F110.
Have any one of you had similar requirement ..? FICO gurus help me to acheiev this .. any exit /BADI ..or ideas..
Appreciate your help in advance

HI ,
Thanks for your reply , but still I am not clear on that.
reason they want to keep this open to be kept as open item , so that item will be picked up by dunning run ..
Basically the open invoice is being cleared by payment doc which was generated by payment run. If we look at BSEG in the open item record BSEG-AUGBL = will have the clearing doc number , and in addition to that BSEG will have created another record for the clearing doc as well .
May be since open invoice record is being updated with clearing doc (AUGBL ) , I belive its not shown up as open item .
Somehow this item should be kept as open item ... that is the req and also paid item payment reference should be transfered to Bill of exchange as well.
Hope you have clear background of my req...
Tnanks in advance ,

When should I use static variable and when should not? Java essential

When should I use static variable and when should not? Java essential

Static => same value for all instances of the class.
Non-static => each instance can have its own value.
Which you need in which circumstances is completely up to you.

Query not running in report builder 3.0

hi, i can run my query in mgmt studio (version 2008R2) and within the query designer of report builder 3.0 but it will not run from report builder. i get a generic error message of "an error has occurred during report processing. (rsProcessingAborted)".
the query uses report parameters and is written with dynamic sql (using a pass-through to oracle). any ideas why the query doesn't execute in report builder ? thanks a bunch,

Hi KanataPablo,
According to your description, it seems that you are using linked server to pass value to oracle. Seeing that the query is worked well in Management Studio, you may have the permission to connect to oracle (In this scenario, make sure the users to run the
query in SSMS and Report Builder are the same user). So this issue can be caused by the user’s permission to connect to report server, the credential of data source and the dynamic query.
We can add the current user as a Login, then click Properties and navigate to User Mappings page, enable ReportServer and ReportServerTempDB options.
We can try to type user name and password, and enable “Use as Windows credentials” as the credential used to connect to data source.
Try with dynamic query:
="Select column1, column2 From tableName where ID IN (" + JOIN(Parameters!param1.value, ",") + ")"
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

If you put iOS 7 on an iPod 4th generation would it just ruin it, of would it just not run like it should?

If you put iOS 7 on an iPod 4th generation would it just ruin it, of would it just not run like it should?

Same answers as your other post!!!

Query which the Reports which not run more than 15 days

Hello,
I need I query to show all the Concurrent Programs which are attached in Application but not run more than 15 days. Also filter will segregate concurrent Reports and concurrent processes.
regards,

Please clarify are you interested in conc programs/reports which has not been run in last 15 days or the ones which were run only in the first 15 days from creation date.
I am pasting the base query which gives you the details like concurrent program name, executable name, executable type, and execuation file name ( you may add condition like fcp.enabled_flag = 'Y' for all active programs etc)
SELECT fe.executable_name,
        fe.execution_file_name,
        fl.meaning,
        fcp.concurrent_program_name,
        fcpt.USER_CONCURRENT_PROGRAM_NAME
FROM    apps.fnd_executables fe,
        apps.fnd_lookups     fl,
        apps.fnd_concurrent_programs fcp,
        apps.fnd_concurrent_programs_tl fcpt
WHERE fcp.executable_id = fe.executable_id
AND    fe.execution_method_code = fl.lookup_code
AND    fl.lookup_type = 'CP_EXECUTION_METHOD_CODE'
AND    fcp.concurrent_program_id = fcpt.concurrent_program_idEdited by: 936671 on Sep 4, 2012 5:58 AM

FOR ALL ENTRIES stmnt. in SELECT query is not running properly

Hello experts,
          In my report program, I write one query on table BSIS.
         Internal table declaration -
       DATA : BEGIN OF DLC_BSIS OCCURS 0,
                        BUKRS LIKE BSIS-BUKRS,
                        GJAHR LIKE BSIS-GJAHR,
                        BELNR LIKE BSIS-BELNR,
                        SHKZG LIKE BSIS-SHKZG,
                        BSCHL LIKE BSIS-BSCHL,
                        AUFNR LIKE BSIS-AUFNR,
                        HKONT LIKE BSIS-HKONT,
                        QSSKZ LIKE BSIS-QSSKZ,
                        DMBTR LIKE BSIS-DMBTR,
                   END OF DLC_BSIS.
Query as follows --
         SELECT BUKRS
                       GJAHR
                       BELNR
                       AHKZG
                       BSCHL
                       AUFNR
                       HKONT
                       QSSKZ
                        DMBTR FROM BSIS
                                  INTO TABLE DLC_BSIS
                                 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN IT_BKPF2
                                 WHERE BELNR = IT_BKPF2-BELNR
                                              AND BUKRS = IT_BKPF2-BUKRS
                                              AND GJAHR = IT_BKPF2-GJAHR.
IT_BKPF2 internal table having -- BUKRS - LT01
                                                     BELNR - 6400000061
                                                     GJAHR - 2009.
And in BSIS database table -- 3 entries are there for the above documnet.
But, in my internal only one entry has come for the same above document.
I think For all entries stmnt. is not running properly. But Why it's not running properly.??
What would be the reason..??
Thanks in advance....!!
Regards,
Poonam.

>
Poonam Patil wrote:
> Hello experts,
>           In my report program, I write one query on table BSIS.
>
>          Internal table declaration -
>
>        DATA : BEGIN OF DLC_BSIS OCCURS 0,
>                         BUKRS LIKE BSIS-BUKRS,
>                         GJAHR LIKE BSIS-GJAHR,
>                         BELNR LIKE BSIS-BELNR,
>                         SHKZG LIKE BSIS-SHKZG,
>                         BSCHL LIKE BSIS-BSCHL,
>                         AUFNR LIKE BSIS-AUFNR,
>                         HKONT LIKE BSIS-HKONT,
>                         QSSKZ LIKE BSIS-QSSKZ,
>                         DMBTR LIKE BSIS-DMBTR,
>                    END OF DLC_BSIS.
>
>          Query as follows --
>
>          SELECT BUKRS
>                        GJAHR
>                        BELNR
>                        AHKZG
>                        BSCHL
>                        AUFNR
>                        HKONT
>                        QSSKZ
>                         DMBTR FROM BSIS
>                                   INTO TABLE DLC_BSIS
>                                  FOR ALL ENTRIES IN IT_BKPF2
>                                  WHERE BELNR = IT_BKPF2-BELNR
>                                               AND BUKRS = IT_BKPF2-BUKRS
>                                               AND GJAHR = IT_BKPF2-GJAHR.
>
> IT_BKPF2 internal table having -- BUKRS - LT01
>                                                      BELNR - 6400000061
>                                                      GJAHR - 2009.
>
> And in BSIS database table -- 3 entries are there for the above documnet.
>
> But, in my internal only one entry has come for the same above document.
>
> I think For all entries stmnt. is not running properly. But Why it's not running properly.??
> What would be the reason..??
>
>
> Thanks in advance....!!
>
> Regards,
> Poonam.
include the buzei field in selection criteria i have faced the same situation earlier.
always select all the key fields.
varun

SAP Query not running

Hi,
I am doing SAP query, If I select Company Code, i need to get the resule of
GL a/c, Buss Area, Cost Center, Profit Center
For this in table joints i taken KNA1, KNB1, SKB1, CSKS
then also i could not run the report.
Rgds
sunfico

Hello
When you have chosen a query and a user group on the initial screen, you can execute the query online or in the background.
Executing Queries Online
Executing Queries in the Background
Improving Response Times
Interactive Functions for ABAP Lists
Direct Interaction
Check this link for further notes executing queries
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/b7/26ddebb1f311d295f40000e82de14a/frameset.htm
regards

Static iview - should not run query

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for