Status in e-Rec

Hi,
Where can we define status for objects (Inprocess, Reject & onhold......etc) in e-Recrutment.
Reards
Kishore Jagarlamudi

Hi,
Thanks for reply i am asking configuration node for to create a new status . (like for candidacy  in system now below status is available those are inprocess, withdrawn, rejected, to-be hired,) now if i want to add one more entry for new status that where can i configure.
Regards,
Kishore Jagarlamudi

Similar Messages

  • Getting ORA-00376 while accessing from application

    Hi,
    Application team is getting below error while accessing the database.
    “ERROR: SQLException, while closing
    connection, exception is ==ORA-00376: file 5 cannot be read at this time
    ORA-01110: data file 5: '/dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts01.dbf'
    Later we renamed the datafile from tblspcsmarts01.dbf  to tblspcsmarts_01.dbf, and still getting the same error while accessing the application.
    And, the datafiles are in online and READ WRITE mode.
    File Status:
    SQL> select file#,name,status,ENABLED,CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#,to_char(CHECKPOINT_TIME,'dd-mon-yy hh24:mi:ss') from v$datafile;
         FILE# NAME                                                         STATUS  ENABLED    CHECKPOINT_CHANGE# TO_CHAR(CHECKPOINT
             1 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/system01.dbf             SYSTEM  READ WRITE           94950500 23-oct-13 15:41:40
             2 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/undo02.dbf               ONLINE  READ WRITE           94950500 23-oct-13 15:41:40
             3 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/sysaux01.dbf             ONLINE  READ WRITE           94950500 23-oct-13 15:41:40
             4 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/users01.dbf              ONLINE  READ WRITE           94950500 23-oct-13 15:41:40
             5 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts_01.dbf      ONLINE  READ WRITE           94950500 23-oct-13 15:41:40
             6 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts02.dbf       ONLINE  READ WRITE           94950500 23-oct-13 15:41:40
             7 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts_03.dbf      ONLINE  READ WRITE           94950500 23-oct-13 15:41:40
    SQL> select FILE_ID,TABLESPACE_NAME,FILE_NAME,BYTES/1024/1024,status  from dba_data_files;
       FILE_ID TABLESPACE_NAME      FILE_NAME                                                    BYTES/1024/1024 STATUS
             1 SYSTEM               /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/system01.dbf                        1024 AVAILABLE
             5 TBLSPCSMARTS         /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts_01.dbf                 7000 AVAILABLE
             3 SYSAUX               /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/sysaux01.dbf                        1024 AVAILABLE
             4 USERS                /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/users01.dbf                         2048 AVAILABLE
             6 TBLSPCSMARTS         /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts02.dbf                  6144 AVAILABLE
             7 TBLSPCSMARTS         /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts_03.dbf                 2048 AVAILABLE
             2 UNDOTBS1             /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/undo02.dbf                          1024 AVAILABLE
    File permissions at OS level.
    [oracle@apt3vl05 smartsgs]$ pwd
    /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs
    [oracle@apt3vl05 smartsgs]$ ls -lrt
    total 29057944
    -rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 7340040192 Oct 23 10:37 tblspcsmarts01.dbf_old
    -rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 1073750016 Oct 23 12:37 temp01.dbf
    -rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 2147491840 Oct 23 15:41 users01.dbf
    -rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 2147491840 Oct 23 15:41 tblspcsmarts_03.dbf
    -rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 6442459136 Oct 23 15:41 tblspcsmarts02.dbf
    -rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 7340040192 Oct 23 15:41 tblspcsmarts_01.dbf
    -rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 1073750016 Oct 23 16:05 sysaux01.dbf
    -rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 1073750016 Oct 23 16:25 undo02.dbf
    -rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 1073750016 Oct 23 16:25 system01.dbf
    -rw-r----- 1 oracle dba    6832128 Oct 23 16:25 control02.ctl
    -rw-r----- 1 oracle dba    6832128 Oct 23 16:25 control01.ctl
    Even i am able to do switch logfile and every thing fine. Below is the excerpt from alert log.
    Wed Oct 23 10:29:59 2013
    Starting ORACLE instance (normal)
    LICENSE_MAX_SESSION = 0
    LICENSE_SESSIONS_WARNING = 0
    Picked latch-free SCN scheme 3
    Using LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_1 parameter default value as /dboracle/orabase/product/10.2.0.4/dbs/arch
    Autotune of undo retention is turned on.
    IMODE=BR
    ILAT =97
    LICENSE_MAX_USERS = 0
    SYS auditing is disabled
    ksdpec: called for event 13740 prior to event group initialization
    Starting up ORACLE RDBMS Version: 10.2.0.4.0.
    System parameters with non-default values:
      processes                = 800
      timed_statistics         = TRUE
      shared_pool_size         = 159383552
      large_pool_size          = 16777216
      java_pool_size           = 159383552
      streams_pool_size        = 16777216
      control_files            = /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/control01.ctl, /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/control02.ctl, /dboracle/admin/smartsgs/control03.ctl
      db_block_size            = 8192
      db_cache_size            = 16777216
      compatible               = 10.2.0.4
      db_file_multiblock_read_count= 16
      fast_start_mttr_target   = 300
      undo_management          = AUTO
      undo_tablespace          = UNDOTBS1
      undo_retention           = 10800
      O7_DICTIONARY_ACCESSIBILITY= TRUE
      remote_login_passwordfile= EXCLUSIVE
      db_domain                =
      instance_name            = smartsgs
      job_queue_processes      = 10
      background_dump_dest     = /dboracle/admin/smartsgs/bdump
      user_dump_dest           = /dboracle/admin/smartsgs/udump
      core_dump_dest           = /dboracle/admin/smartsgs/cdump
      sort_area_size           = 524288
      db_name                  = smartsgs
      open_cursors             = 800
      star_transformation_enabled= FALSE
      query_rewrite_enabled    = FALSE
      pga_aggregate_target     = 25165824
      aq_tm_processes          = 1
    PMON started with pid=2, OS id=9173
    PSP0 started with pid=3, OS id=9178
    MMAN started with pid=4, OS id=9180
    DBW0 started with pid=5, OS id=9187
    LGWR started with pid=6, OS id=9194
    CKPT started with pid=7, OS id=9200
    SMON started with pid=8, OS id=9202
    RECO started with pid=9, OS id=9204
    CJQ0 started with pid=10, OS id=9206
    MMON started with pid=11, OS id=9208
    MMNL started with pid=12, OS id=9210
    Wed Oct 23 10:30:01 2013
    ALTER DATABASE   MOUNT
    Wed Oct 23 10:30:06 2013
    Setting recovery target incarnation to 1
    Wed Oct 23 10:30:06 2013
    Successful mount of redo thread 1, with mount id 765417449
    Wed Oct 23 10:30:06 2013
    Database mounted in Exclusive Mode
    Completed: ALTER DATABASE   MOUNT
    Wed Oct 23 10:30:06 2013
    ALTER DATABASE OPEN
    Wed Oct 23 10:30:06 2013
    Thread 1 opened at log sequence 855
      Current log# 3 seq# 855 mem# 0: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo1/smartsgs/redo01c.log
      Current log# 3 seq# 855 mem# 1: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo2/smartsgs/redo02c.log
      Current log# 3 seq# 855 mem# 2: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo3/smartsgs/redo03c.log
    Successful open of redo thread 1
    Wed Oct 23 10:30:06 2013
    SMON: enabling cache recovery
    Wed Oct 23 10:30:07 2013
    Successfully onlined Undo Tablespace 6.
    Wed Oct 23 10:30:07 2013
    SMON: enabling tx recovery
    Wed Oct 23 10:30:07 2013
    Database Characterset is WE8ISO8859P15
    Opening with internal Resource Manager plan
    where NUMA PG = 1, CPUs = 2
    replication_dependency_tracking turned off (no async multimaster replication found)
    Starting background process QMNC
    QMNC started with pid=14, OS id=9246
    Wed Oct 23 10:30:10 2013
    Completed: ALTER DATABASE OPEN
    Wed Oct 23 10:37:38 2013
    alter tablespace TBLSPCSMARTS offline
    Wed Oct 23 10:37:38 2013
    Completed: alter tablespace TBLSPCSMARTS offline
    Wed Oct 23 10:43:58 2013
    alter tablespace TBLSPCSMARTS rename datafile '/dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts01.dbf' to '/dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts_01.dbf'
    Wed Oct 23 10:43:58 2013
    Completed: alter tablespace TBLSPCSMARTS rename datafile '/dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts01.dbf' to '/dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts_01.dbf'
    Wed Oct 23 10:44:14 2013
    alter tablespace TBLSPCSMARTS online
    Wed Oct 23 10:44:15 2013
    Completed: alter tablespace TBLSPCSMARTS online
    Wed Oct 23 15:02:00 2013
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 856 (LGWR switch)
      Current log# 1 seq# 856 mem# 0: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo1/smartsgs/redo01a.log
      Current log# 1 seq# 856 mem# 1: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo2/smartsgs/redo02a.log
      Current log# 1 seq# 856 mem# 2: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo3/smartsgs/redo03a.log
    Wed Oct 23 15:06:11 2013
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 857 (LGWR switch)
      Current log# 2 seq# 857 mem# 0: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo1/smartsgs/redo01b.log
      Current log# 2 seq# 857 mem# 1: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo2/smartsgs/redo02b.log
      Current log# 2 seq# 857 mem# 2: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo3/smartsgs/redo03b.log
    Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 858
    Checkpoint not complete
      Current log# 2 seq# 857 mem# 0: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo1/smartsgs/redo01b.log
      Current log# 2 seq# 857 mem# 1: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo2/smartsgs/redo02b.log
      Current log# 2 seq# 857 mem# 2: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo3/smartsgs/redo03b.log
    Wed Oct 23 15:06:17 2013
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 858 (LGWR switch)
      Current log# 3 seq# 858 mem# 0: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo1/smartsgs/redo01c.log
      Current log# 3 seq# 858 mem# 1: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo2/smartsgs/redo02c.log
      Current log# 3 seq# 858 mem# 2: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo3/smartsgs/redo03c.log
    Wed Oct 23 15:06:17 2013
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 859 (LGWR switch)
      Current log# 1 seq# 859 mem# 0: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo1/smartsgs/redo01a.log
      Current log# 1 seq# 859 mem# 1: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo2/smartsgs/redo02a.log
      Current log# 1 seq# 859 mem# 2: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo3/smartsgs/redo03a.log
    Wed Oct 23 15:09:00 2013
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 860 (LGWR switch)
      Current log# 2 seq# 860 mem# 0: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo1/smartsgs/redo01b.log
      Current log# 2 seq# 860 mem# 1: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo2/smartsgs/redo02b.log
      Current log# 2 seq# 860 mem# 2: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo3/smartsgs/redo03b.log
    Wed Oct 23 15:09:02 2013
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 861 (LGWR switch)
      Current log# 3 seq# 861 mem# 0: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo1/smartsgs/redo01c.log
      Current log# 3 seq# 861 mem# 1: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo2/smartsgs/redo02c.log
      Current log# 3 seq# 861 mem# 2: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo3/smartsgs/redo03c.log
    Wed Oct 23 15:37:37 2013
    alter database datafile 5 online
    Wed Oct 23 15:37:37 2013
    Completed: alter database datafile 5 online
    Wed Oct 23 15:37:58 2013
    alter database datafile 7 online
    Wed Oct 23 15:37:58 2013
    Completed: alter database datafile 7 online
    Wed Oct 23 15:41:09 2013
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 862 (LGWR switch)
      Current log# 1 seq# 862 mem# 0: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo1/smartsgs/redo01a.log
      Current log# 1 seq# 862 mem# 1: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo2/smartsgs/redo02a.log
      Current log# 1 seq# 862 mem# 2: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo3/smartsgs/redo03a.log
    Wed Oct 23 15:41:10 2013
    Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 863 (LGWR switch)
      Current log# 2 seq# 863 mem# 0: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo1/smartsgs/redo01b.log
      Current log# 2 seq# 863 mem# 1: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo2/smartsgs/redo02b.log
      Current log# 2 seq# 863 mem# 2: /dborafiles/nGTA/oraredo3/smartsgs/redo03b.log
    Please advice how can we troubleshoot what could be the issue.
    Thanks,
    Dasarath

    Output of the requested commands.
    SQL> select * from v$datafile_header;
         FILE# STATUS  ERROR                                                                 FORMAT REC FUZ CREATION_CHANGE# CREATION_ TABLESPACE_NAME             TS#     RFILE# RESETLOGS_CHANGE# RESETLOGS CHECKPOINT_CHANGE# CHECKPOIN CHECKPOINT_COUNT      BYTES     BLOCKS NAME                                               SPACE_HEADER    LAST_DEALLOC_SCN
             1 ONLINE                                                                             0 NO  YES                8 23-JUL-09 SYSTEM                        0         1                  1 23-JUL-09           94978106 24-OCT-13              913 1073741824     131072 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/system01.dbf
             2 ONLINE                                                                             0 NO  YES         94828823 22-OCT-13 UNDOTBS1                      6         2                  1 23-JUL-09           94978106 24-OCT-13               37 1073741824     131072 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/undo02.dbf     8388610
             3 ONLINE                                                                             0 NO  YES             7545 23-JUL-09 SYSAUX                        2         3                  1 23-JUL-09           94978106 24-OCT-13              912 1073741824     131072 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/sysaux01.dbf   12582914
             4 ONLINE                                                                             0 NO  YES           170715 23-JUL-09 USERS                         4         4                  1 23-JUL-09           94978106 24-OCT-13              907 2147483648     262144 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/users01.dbf    16777218
             5 ONLINE                                                                             0 NO  YES         94891412 22-OCT-13 TBLSPCSMARTS                  5         5                  1 23-JUL-09           94978106 24-OCT-13               30 7340032000     896000 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts_0 20971522
                                                                                                                                                                                 1.dbf
             6 ONLINE                                                                             0 NO  YES         94891511 22-OCT-13 TBLSPCSMARTS                  5         6                  1 23-JUL-09           94978106 24-OCT-13               28 6442450944     786432 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts02 25165826
                                                                                                                                                                                 .dbf
             7 ONLINE                                                                             0 NO  YES         94891933 22-OCT-13 TBLSPCSMARTS                  5         7                  1 23-JUL-09           94978106 24-OCT-13               29 2147483648     262144 /dborafiles/nGTA/oradata01/smartsgs/tblspcsmarts_0 29360130
                                                                                                                                                                                 3.dbf
    7 rows selected.
    SQL> select * from v$recover_file;
    no rows selected
    Thanks,
    Dasarath

  • Urgent Help Cant find an error in this statement and jdk is showing

    Error:
    Exception: [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Syntax error in CONSTRAINT clause.
    `````````````````H E L P```````````````
    s1.executeUpdate("Create Table " + n + " (Sno integer, Name varchar(20),So varchar(5),Source varchar(15), TTO integer, TTH integer, Status varchar(5), Rec varchar(15), DOJ Date, Type varchar(10), Sector varchar(15), Primary varchar(15), Proj varchar(15), Skills varchar(15), Level varchar(10), Band integer, Location varchar(15), Company varchar(20), Remarks varchar(50), Test date, IV date, Qualification varchar(15), RefSal float, RIF_NO integer, RIF_DATE Date, Target_Date Date, Lead_Time date, SLA_ACH Date, R1 date, R2 date, R3 date, R4 date,R5 date, R6 date, R7 date, R8 date, RR1 date,RR2 date, RR3 date, RR4 date,RR5 date, RR6 date, RR7 date, RR8 date)");
    I am using access as backend database on a remote machine.

    n is not a numeric data but is of string typeThat was just for your information because you didn't show any of your java code.
    Did you try changing the names of those columns? I haven't used access much, but i believe there is some workaround to using reserved words by putting square brackets aroundf them. I haven't done it, I just noticed the access gui front end does it sometimes. i found it much easier to just not use words I thought might be reserved.

  • Capture error records

    Hi All,
    I have requirement like ,after executing any package/procedure/function if the status is Invalid/inprogress that data should be stored in some other table.
    so I have created a table called Status table
    create table Stat
    ( sno number,status varchar2(20))have written the following procedure
    create or replace procedure check_status
    as
    cursor c1 is
      select * from emp;
      rec c1%rowtype;
    Begin
    Open C1;
       Loop
         fetch c1 into rec;
          if rec.status='INVALID' or rec.status='Inprogress' then
           insert into stat(sno,status) values(stat_seq.nextval,rec.status);  -- created a sequence for this as well
           end if;
        end loop;
      close C1;
    End check_status;Emp table is having 3 "Invalid" and 7 "Inprogress" records. so the STAT table should contain only the records having Invalid and In progress records.
    but here am facing the problem like Procedure compiled successfully. if am giving the query select * from STAT; it's containing "0" records. it's not showing Invalid and Inprogress records. so could you please look into the code and let me know where do I need to make the changes to retrieve the Invalid and Inprogress records.
    Thanks.

    As you suggested I mentioned the given Insert statement then compiled the query. It compiled successfully.
    but it is giving the o/p as
    all rows having status as "INVALID" because in the EMP table I have 10 records with "INVALID" status. total table is having 1000 records. after executing the procedure the whole STAT table is giving the O/P as 1000 records are in "INVALID" status instead of 10 records.
    Briefly:
    1. Table is having 1000 records in EMP table
    2. in this 10 records are having status "INVALID"
    3.Created temporary table called STAT having columns SNO,STATUS
    4. Now my requirement is once compiled the procedure the STAT table should contain 10 records which are having "INVALID" status.
    5. but here my concern is whole 1000 records are updating with INVALID after executing the Procedure.
    Please have a look and let me know where can I do the modifications.
    Thanks.

  • Populating block items

    I want to populate my block with records that have status = '4'. If a cardno with another status is entered, I want to show a message that it is not a valid card. When I enter a card no with status that is not 4, nothing happens in my form. No Message shows. What am I doing wrong here? Thank you.
    Below is my code:
    PROCEDURE GET_REC1 IS
    CURSOR cn IS SELECT * FROM memb.member
    WHERE card_no = :ret_view.card_in;
    BEGIN
    FOR rec IN cn
    LOOP
    IF :ret_view.status <> '4'
    THEN
    alert_for_val('stop_alert', 'Card Number '|| :ret_view.card_in||
    ' Is Invalid. Please Enter valid Card Number');
    --raise form_trigger_failure;
    clear_form(no_validate);
    ELSIF :ret_view.status = '4'
    THEN
    :ret_view.lodge := rec.lodge;
    :ret_view.status := rec.status;
    :ret_view.status_date := rec.status_date;
    :ret_view.first_name := rec.first_name;
    :ret_view.middle_init := rec.middle_init;
    :ret_view.last_name := rec.last_name;
    EXIT WHEN CN%NOTFOUND;
    END IF;
    END LOOP;
    END;

    Normally, you do not use a select statement to populate a block. Doing it your way will set all the rows in the block to Status=INSERT. So when you commit, your form will attempt to insert new rows in the base-table for every row you have populated.
    The correct way to populate a block is to use the Execute_Query command, or do it using the Enter Query and Execute Query function keys or menu items. You do NOT write a select statement to populate a base-table block -- Forms does it for you automatically.
    Using your For loop, every time it encounters a bad record, it should pop up an alert.
    I suspect there is a problem in your Alert_For_Val procedure.

  • E-Rec 6.04 Incorrect status of external candidate user password.

    Hi,
    We are on E-Rec 604 with seperated standalone e-rec system.
    I have a problem with the password of external candidates. When an external candidate is registered in the application, introduce user and password and all mandatory fields and all work ok. He can enter in his profile, introduce all fields, apply offers, etcu2026
    But when he log off and try to access again, the password is incorrect. If the external candidate Request a new password all works ok and when introduce this one and change this initial password, this new one let him to access in the future login in the correct  way.
    I realized that this is because the USER in R3 of the external candidate is cretaed with the field Password Status set to Initial password (set by administrator) and I think it is wrong, the status must be Product. Password. Instead, when request new password and set the new one the field status is Product. Password., the correct statusu2026
    I´m very confused I don´t know what can I did wrong.
    The type of the user is Dialog and the user that create all the external candidates user is the WF-BATCH my workflow useru2026 I think perhaps this is the reasonu2026 This is the correct user to create the external users?. Perhaps.. I set the assigned agent bad in any Workflowu2026?
    Somebody could guide me, please?.
    Best Regards,
    Esther

    Hi,
    it seems you have a workflow in background sending out a smartforms based email after registration.
    This smartforms seems to have a password generation mechanism, which overwrites the password of the user with a new initial one.
    Please check that.
    Best regards
    Sebastian

  • E-Rec - HRP 5102 has multipe status for Candidate profile Released

    Hello,
    I had a requirement to transfer the internal candidates to E-Rec system (from HR system) with their candidate profile in released status.
    Hence i have customized the ALE to update the table HRP5102 - STATUS with status "2"(Released) whenever data transfer is done from HR system.
    I have two questions here;
    There are 3 statuses available for the candidate profile in HRP5102 - STATUS field
    0 - Locked
    1 - Released
    2 - Released
    What is the difference between status 1 & 2 ?
    When running a candidate search (using the TREX search), it does not throw the entire list of candidates whose profiles are released but only a few. Is this hapenning because i have the candidates data stored in HRP5102 in status "2"??
    Any inputs on the above queries would help me..
    Thanks
    G Raj

    Hello,
    I think we discussed this topic here some times before. The reason for the 3 status values are the original 3 status for the candidate which were supposed to be "currently not looking for a job" (registered a while ago but currently quite satisfied with what i do), "only passive looking for a job" (my job is not that bad but i will come if you put enough cash on the table) and "active looking for a job" (I'm a talent - GET ME OUT OF HERE!).
    Later SAP realized that this system does not really make sense as nearly everyone will change the job if the price is fine so the system was changed to be "can be found in the talent pool" and "can not be found in talent pool". But as there were already 3 values, 2 of them got the same meaning. So there is not difference between 1 and 2.
    In all cases I checked in the coding there is always a check against value 0. EQ 0 for locked and NE 0 for released. So this should not be the reason if someone is not found in the talent pool search.
    Best Regards
    Roman Weise

  • SMS status Delivered but the recipient doesn't rec...

    I've sent about 10 SMS to international mobile number but that person says she doesn't get the SMS. My credit was deducted, status was delivered but SMS does not received on the mobile phone. What is going on? Totally disappointed with this kind of service. Please look at this problem ASAP.

    Hey Mbritton247,
    In case you haven't yet, I would run through all of the recommended troubleshooting steps in the following article and see if that resolves the issue:
    iOS: Troubleshooting Messages
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2755
    Welcome to Apple Support Communities!
    Regards,
    Delgadoh

  • Status in Interaction Record update based on a follow up Business Transacti

    Hi
    I put in place within ICWC the Interaction record creation as initial step followed by a creation of a Service ticket.
    I would like at the Completion of my service tickets the interaction record to be completed automatically as we dont want any agent to manually complete them.
    Thanks in advance
    Aurelien
    CRM 4.0

    Hi,
    I tried to come back to the idea of the Status Completed as default when Interaction Record is created.
    My scenario is:
    Confirm BP
    Confirm IBASE
    Click Service ticket on the left Menu (Interaction Record Menu is not visible anymore)
    then i am on the ticket...
    I noticed different small problems:
    1/ The service organisation determination is not trigger anymore at the ticket creation, it is triggered only when an update occur on the ticket, in my case only when the classification is filled.
    2/ When i saved the ticket, the Interaction Record appears in the Business Context, when i click on it (it is completed straigh away), but an error is present in the Interaction record, CRM_ORGMAN - 039 (Enter an organizational unit (Service))
    When i had set up my interaction record status profile with more than one status (not Completed straight away) the error number 2 never occured.
    The error number 1 always occurs if i use the scenario in ICWEB:
    When i use one transaction type to multiple transaction type as dependent business transaction type, in my case the transaction type linked to my Business transaction profile (interaction Rec) is ZS33, then as default Service Transaction in the Dependand transaction i used a ZEST.
    Config done in  SAP Implementation Guide -> Customer Relationship Management -> Interaction Center WebClient -> Business Transactions ->  Define Business Transaction Profiles
    In case that i used directly ZEST as the default transaction type for my Business Transaction profile the Org determination occurs correctly.
    As anyone seen this problem before?
    Or is there anything to do to transfer the org from the Interaction Record to the Service Ticket? is there a link?
    I have been through all the topics about Interaction record but couldnt find anything related to my problem.
    Thanks in advance
    Aurelien

  • Process chain status shows incorrect status

    When ever i receive bad data requests from R/3, BW pulls the error requests into a separate PSA and pass-thru the good once in another PSA and then into datatarget.
    However the overall status is green for the job/package and the package when executed in ProcessChain does not show an errors. But the errors are not noticed until user notices it in the qyuery.
    How to capture such errors and notified, is their any automation possible? I have setup e-mail on process chain failures but these kind of errors are not captured because the overall status of request is GREEN.
    Here is the status on infopackage.
    Incorrect data records - error requests (total status GREEN)
    Diagnosis
    Data records were recognized as incorrect.
    System response
    The valid records were updated in the data target and can be used in reporting.
    The incorrect records were not written to the data target, but were posted retractively under a new request number in the PSA.
    Procedure
    Check the data in the error requests, correct the errors, and post the error requests.

    Hi Gopikrishna,
    Please check if "Error Handling" in the Update Tab of your Infopackage has been enabled, I guess it is.
    If this has been enabled , then the error recs will be isolated and only the Correct records will be posted into the Data Target. It is the responsibility of the BW Administrator to identify such errored records, correct them and Post it back to the DAta target. Because error handling is used, the Monitor will show Green, as all the error recs have been separated.
    To avoid this, you have to remove Error Handling from the INfopackage, then you will see the Load failing and the Process Step in the process chain would turn RED with the corresponding error messages.
    Regards,
    Praveen.

  • Error in E-rec web Service and BSP

    Hi Folks
    We are facing an issue with Requisition Management in E-rec. A workflow is triggered for requisition management and goes to approver. The workitem does not appear in the UWL of the user however when we monitor the log, it shows the workitem is with approver and without any error.
    Our problem is it does not show the workitem in the approver's UWL and when we test the approval serivce and handler service in SICF, it gives us the following message
    1.Service Name : wshandler (REQUEST HANDLER FOR WEB SERVICES)
    Error in Web service execution
    The launch handler was called with an incomplete parameter list
    2.Service name :  hrrcf_approval (Recruiter: Approval of Status Change)
    Error message : Calling the BSP page was terminated due to an error.
    SAP Note
    The following error text was processed in the system:
    BSP Exception: Das Objekt default.htm in der URL /sap/bc/bsp/sap/hrrcf_approval/default.htm?sap-client=100&sap-sessioncmd=open ist nicht gültig.
    Please guide us, how to fix.
    Regards
    Netweaver team

    Hi,  Were you able to resolve this issue?
    IF not then please go to transaction wf_handcust and maintain the entries under Launch Handler, Callback Handler and callback Dialog. I had the same issue and your's was the only related message I could search in SDN so thought of sharing the solution.
    Regards,
    VInay

  • Master data HR to E-REC standalone system not being created using PFAL

    I am trying to transfer data from HR to standalone E-REC system using PFAL transcation.
    IDOC  transferred with Status 53.
    BADIS of E-rec are Implemented.
    In e-rec relationship O to S, S to CP, CP to US, CP to BP and CP to P are getting created Properly in table HRP1001.
    We are unable to see the data for Infotypes 0000,0001,0002,0006,0105 for the same CP in PP01.
    We tried the same scenario with SRM system and there we were able to see the data of above infotypes for a CP.
    Table T77S0 are maintained according to the SAP notes.
    Please through some light on how we can transfer the data of HR master to E-rec and where exactly we have to check for this master data in E-REC
    Thanks in Advance.

    Dear Rohit,
    Firstly,
    No, you cannot have infotypes like how you have mentioned for SRM. This is not how it is in eRecruiting. As Raj suggested, we look at other infotypes of this.
    5102 : gives you details about the candidates.Object NA.
    5105: Qualification details etc.
    For an object P in the system, there is CP. On activating the relevant BADIs, a BP & NA are created for the CP when transferring data from core HR. Now, this does not necessarily mean that all the HR infotypes are transferred to relvant infotypes in eRecruiting. The data is handled differently.
    If you are sure that NA exists, then internal candidates are created successfully. Next thing would be to map this NA object with the relevant PA details like name, address,email address etc. For this we make use of the BP object associated with the CP & not the CP or the NA.
    So, if you would want to check if the transfer is successful then you go to tcode BP & check if the name & address details etc are the same as the corresponding P for which the NA is created.
    To see more of the core HR info, you can check the business partner BUT000 against the relevant BP.
    I hope this clears some of your confusion.
    Secondly,
    Regarding the BADI, I am aware that this BADi is mainly required in an integration implementation scenario. But i think the sample implementation of this BADI CONV_HR_DATA_TO_EREC  is required to create internal candidates from idocs.I think this is required for the P to CPBPNA transformation.But if you say the NA is created without this then maybe i am wrong. Please take a second look at this.
    Regards,
    Sowmya

  • GL balance carry forward special period 13 to new fiscal year and Rec acct

    Hi,
    would like to seek for your advice as below question/problem.
    a) User now is doing the year end closing. Normally the closing is up to the period 12 and for the purpose of track the adjustments made by the management and auditors user post to period 13 2008 from the pervious financial year. Our concern is when perform the GL Balance carry forward to new fiscal year which is 2009 does the system carry forward the GL adjustment figure from period 13 to the new fiscal year on top of that when we perform the GL balance carry forward to new fiscal year 2009 and later on find out there is an audit adjustment that need to done and user post in the period 13 fiscal year 2008 can the adjustment auto post to the new fiscal year?
    b) Can we change the Rec account in the vendor master as currently user need to change the vendor from difference Rec account which from joint venture to subsidiary account code? If involve the SPRO configuration how where should we configure? After we change the configuration does all the posting from one Rec account subsidiary will auto post to another Rec account Joint venture?
    Kindly advice.

    Hi,
    Thank you for the prompt reply.
    a)could you provide the path/T-code to view the  vendor master activity screen layout configuration field status for reconciliation account should be Optional.
    b)Beside,what the impact of change the reconciliation account from one to another? It is neccesary/must to do the balance sheet adjustment for change the reconcilation account?
    Can we post the balance through the manual JV (F.02)with the document type is ZD(Debit Note) to post the balance of old reconciliation account to the clearing account and then change of the reconciliation account to the new account then reverse the posting of the JV? By doing so what is the impact in the system? In this scenarion do we need to do the balance sheet adjustment?
    c) You mention balances from the old recon will not be posted to the new reconcilation account unless I do a balance sheet adjustment it is mean after I run the balance sheet adjustment the balance from the old reconcilation account will auto post to the new reconcilation? What other impact will effect the system?
    d) If the company never run the balance sheet adjustment before and due to the scenerion mention above they run the balance sheet adjustment for the first time what are the impact in the system for the company that only have one business area and also for the company which have more than one business area?
    e) What are the prerequisite step/configuation/setting need to be setup in order to run the balance sheet adjustment as the company perviously never run the balance sheet adjustment before? Kindly provide reference/document/guide.
    e) Change of reconcilation account does it related/impact to the account group of vendor master?
    Please help.

  • Billing document - Baseline date change status

    Hi folks,
    I have the following issue with the baseline date for the billing documents.
    Billing date proposed by the systems based on the goods issue is 30.01.2010 while the date of creation of document is 31.01.2010. In FB03 transaction baseline date status is showing as changed from 30.01.2010 to 31.01.2010. Following is the setting done: In OBB8 for the said payment terms the baseline date shown is the "posting date' and in VTFL item level copy control
    it is defined as "Data VBRK/VBRP         007  Inv.Split (Rec/Div)".
    Why is the baseline date getting changed by the way  User is entering the bill of lading in the outbound delivery >Header>Shipment (on 31.01.2010)..not sure if this is in any way contributing to the baseline date change...Appreciate your reply.
    cheers
    Joseph

    Baseline date is generally governed by config in OBB8 but we can influence it by writing code in USEREXIT_FILL_VBRK_VBRP. This will obviously affect baseline date in billing docs. The same should get copied into the accounting document. Now the catch is if the accounting document is changed (e.g. Payment terms) then system will populate baseline date as per the config.
    So may be you should check if there is anything in the userexit and whether accounting document was changed.

  • IDOC number and status

    Hi All,
    i am using Function Module IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS to post inventory records.
    its posting the data sucsessfully but it does not return IDOC number and status.
    i can see the status and number in WE02 but please tell me how can i get that in my program.
    Thakns and regards
    Pankaj

    Hi friend,
           U can get the status and number of IDOC in WE05 and WE07.
           Once u get the number of IDOC got to table EDIDC(Control Rec table),
           EDID4(Data Rec table) and EDIDS(status Rec table) to get the information
           related to status and content of idoc.
           Directly, u can specify it in ur program as Tables:EDIDC,EDID4,EDIDS
           and get the info according to ur idoc number.
    Thanks N Regards,
            Manian.

Maybe you are looking for