STMS 2 System Landscape

Hi,
I found a case where a company has 2 systems created, the production system has 2 instances, production and contigency. The routes created are from development to production. Contigency its apparencly used as QAS system.
Is this a 2 system landscape or a 3 system landscape?, this configuration ensure that only every release has been tested in QAS environment??
Kindly Regards,
C.Arce

Hi,
What you are trying to configure TMS for two domains? If it s two domain only u have to go for domain link concept.
Otherwise if it s 2 system means set the DIR_TRANS parameter(Domain controller) as a common in both system and also set it in OS level in host directory.
Then add another sytem option in Domain controller then approve the same.
then configure the route.
Thanks and regards
Vijay
Message was edited by:
vijay kumar gopal

Similar Messages

STMS Route configuration in Three system Landscape with DEV,QA and PRD

Hi
We have Three system landscape.i.e DEV,Quality and PRD
Before Somebody configured the STMS by selecting standard two system land scape ( Dev and QAS)
We Have Installed Production Server And Added into Existing STMS Configuration
Now Three Systems Showing, In Import Overviw Screen
How Can I Create Route Between Three systems
What I am Asking Is Without Delet Old Roots
Can i Create it are Not
regards
NSN

Refer these links:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/1c/2ddc0901db11d284870000e8a57770/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/44/b4a0137acc11d1899e0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards,
Ravi

ChaRM: 4-System-Landscape possible?

Hello,
regarding our system landscape we have no clue how ChaRM will handle following situation
DEV-System: Development-System were the developments should be done.
QAS-System: Test-System were the tests should be done.
FNC-System: nothing to do here, just for functional tests
PRD-System: Production System
Transport routes are DEV -> transport group which deliveres QAS and FNC, and from QAS -> PRD.
What needs to be done to set this up correctly for ChaRM (e.g.: SMSY-logical components)?
Thanks in advance.

Hi
You have two options:
1) assign FNC to task list: you can start the import to this system in the task list manually
2) or task list without FNC: you can schedule a job 'import all' at FNC or import manually via STMS
Confiiguration:
1) One log. component with D-Q-FNC-P (Q and FNC are of role target systems)
2) One log. component with D-Q-P
regards
Andy

URGENT: Changing System Landscape in ChaRM

Ok...here is our situation:
We use ChaRM with a 3 tier system landscape (DEV > USER > PROD).
Out USER system has been down for a month (maintenance) so we went live with ChaRM as follows:
DEV > PREPROD >PROD
Our USER system is now back up and running so we have replaced the Logical Component on the project to reflect this. This has worked ok but the task list is still showing the old system landscape. i.e. its showing PREPROD still instead of USER. How do I resolve this?
Do I have to complete the existing cycle and then create a new one? This would be fine except I would lose all the jobs I have scheduled in the task list (schedule every 15min EVERY day....took me ages).
Any suggestions?
Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hi,
About this issue, there is a detail information about this in blog point 6 u201CChanges in the logical components of a project where Charm is already activatedu201D.
This is the link: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/15116
So, you have to change the transport route accordingly and then close current maintenance cycle and generate a new one.
Following is the steps.
1: please import all the transport requests which were associated in the current maintenance cycle task list by STMS manually import.
1: change transport route from DEV > PREPROD >PROD to DEV > USER > PROD on the domain controller system.
2: close current maintenance cycle.
3: change the system landscape to DEV > USER > PROD in solar_project_admin.
4: generate a new maintenance cycle.
Thanks
Regards,
Vikram

Converting a two system landscape to three system landscape

Currently, I have a two system landscape: DEV (development) and PRD (production) in STMS
I would like to add a QAS system so I will end up with DEV-QAS-PRD in STMS
I would like to keep all data the way it is. I don't want to lose any logs or files in the data and cofiles directories.
This is how I have this planned:
-Include the QAS system in the existing Tranport Domain.(stms in QAS)
-In transaction STMS go to OVERVIEW -> Transport Routes -> Standard Configuration -> Three systems in group
and then save the configuration.(stms on the TDC)
I'm thinking this will preserrve the current log files and the corresponding data and cofile files.
If you have done this, I would appreciate any comment or advise.
Thanks.

Addition to above suggestion - Adding new system to existing landscape doesn't make any change to the data/cofiles. Process just adds additional system.
Regards,
Nick Loy

Client Roles in a Three System Landscape

I initially post this Question in other forum:
Hi all,
We have a three system landscape. In the Development client, we have the Customizing Client, the Sandbox Cliet and a Training client. I have some questions about this configuration:
Acording to System and Client Settings - System Administration Assistant (BC-RRR) - SAP Library, Training client must be in Quality Assurance System, and it must be created by client copy from client QTST (it gets the transports from Custimizing). In this Training System we must create users for all our key-users to training. We must not create any user for key-users in sandbox client (this client is for the DEV team). is that ok?
What are the downsides of having out TRAINING client in the Development System?
Now, a consultant is asking me to open some modifications in the TRAINING client: He needs to load Exchange rates (OB08) in that client, but he is getting "Client is not modifiable". They are asking me to create users for key-users in the sandbox client and the training client.
I need to know if they are using the system in the right way. I dont want the system to become a mess.
I been reading this notes: SAP Note 356483. I don´t know what this means: "Now the corresponding Customizing object is no longer subject to the transport connection and is excluded from the changeability check. The change is active in all clients of the system. You can also change the Customizing object in a locked client (independent of the client role). However, now it is also no longer possible to manually transport entries of the view or table."
Aditional notes:
SAP Note 78329, sap kb 356483
Thanks for your help!
One person answere me this:
Hi
You should create your question in the appropriate area :
Software Logistics
The drawback of having training client in dev system is that it could be negatively impacted by ongoing changes performed in that system (custom program that are changed, not working...)
Some specific customizing changes can be set as current setting and thus can be modified without needing to open customizing but only if the client is set as productive.
There is also a way do deactivate modification recording of objects (aka deactivating the transport connection) but, if you apply this change for this activity/object, you won't be able any more to record change into transport orders
Regards
356483 - Customizing: Current settings in the test system
77430 - Customizing: Current settings

Hi Andres
I do not really now the exact impact, it might prevent some business data from being mass processed or overwritten...
I did had to deactivate the transport connection on specific objects/activities for some customers.
It depends on the frequency of that activity. I don't like to open the client to modification as you can sometime forget to close it back, and sometime also it gave the opportunity to other consultants to make changes that would create inconsistency among envt in the whole landscape.
At least activating the recording of changes could help in tracking the source of modifications
RZ10 => rec/client=ALL
STMS => RECCLIENT=ALL
Regards

New quality system addition in three system landscape

Hi,
I need to add a new quality system (TAQ) in a three system landscape.
TED(development)----> TEQ(quality)----->TEP(Production).
new landscape will be
How should i add the new system in landscape.
1)Through extended Tranport
2) is there any virtual system addition which can help
3)how can i preserve my current STMS configuration for backup.
Kindly help with the approach and procedure for the same.

Hello Swati,
You can add another QA system using normal STMS config. Just need to create another delivery route from DEV to QA.
Older STMS configuration is stored using version management. You can later extract the older version from Tcode : STMS -> Overview -> Transport routes-> Configuration menu -> Get other version.
Regards,
Denish

ChaRM - Mainenance Cycle in two system landscape - possible?

Hi Experts,
we are trying to create a maintenace cycle with two systems.
We have a system defined as "Evaluation System" and the second is defined as "Production System".
Generally Question
Is it possible to create a maintenace cycle for a two-system-scenario?
Specific Question - Erorrs/Warnings
While checking the project we got several errors/problems:
1 Differences between BC Set SOLMAN40_CHARM_BASICFUNC_001 and database
2 Differences between BC Set SOLMAN40_SDESK_BASICFUNC_000 and database
3 No consolidation system found for EID-800 (project Z_CRM_T)
4 No track for project Z_CRM_T with log. system EID/800
5 Message from function module /TMWFLOW/CHECK_PRJ_CONS: No export system for CBI-001
CTS
The transport system is configured correct - Check in STMS is OK
Question:
The comparison checks seem to be OK - is it necessary to reactivate the BC Sets?
Kind regards
Tom

Hi,
the system role for your client/systems in the logical component is very important:
- The development system needs to be defined as a Source System.
- If you don't have a QA, leave all target systems empty. If there are one or more consolidation/integration/regression systems, assign them to system role Target System.
- Your production system uses system role Production System.
The defined Development client needs a client dependent (TMS parameter CTC=1) consolidation track to the QA, or in a 2 Tier landscape to the production system. In a 3 Tier landscape you need a delivery track from QAS client to your production client. But as you wrote, TMS has been set up already. I just would like to mention all steps....
Check that all RFC connections have been set up correctly. Especially the Trusted RFC. Don't forget the Trusted RFC to client 000 ot the TMs domain controller.
In tab Systems ( transaction code SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN => System Landscape ):
Make sure you see all clients of your logical component. If not hit button System Role Assignment and add your System role.
Then still in the same tab: Hit button Shipment Routes and make sure, you see the complete transport track and only this track here!
After correct setup of TMS, RFCs, logical components and assignment of LC to your project:
First perform a Refresh and a Check in transaction code SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN => System Landscape => Change Requests. Then please recreate the maintenance cycle (and task list).
Regards,
Holger

ChaRM with 4 system Landscape.

Hi, 
We are trying to implement ChaRM in a four system landscape 
 
AFD --> AFQ --> AFI --> AFP 
 
defined logical components, project, created maintenance cycle. U'gent correction works fine. 
 
but for regular correction, we are able to create TRs release it, but not getting imported into AFQ and of course further steps are not happening. When the status is "Development Completed", we perform "Log on to system", this pops up with a dialogue with options 
 
AFQ 200 
AFI 100 
 
to logon to system. 
 
This is the only clue we got. 
 
When we perform the actions, the status keeps changing and goes to status "Production". It doesn't obey the phases maintenance cycle as well, irrespective of the phases the status keeps changing and goes to status "Production" 
We are missing some minor thin's. 
 
Have we defined the system roles properly? IF not, how does the flow works perfectly fine with respect to U'gent correction. 
 
Please help. 
 
 
Regards, 
Ragu 
 

Hi Ragu,
I have a few questions here:
1. What normal correction type are you using - SDMI or SDMJ
2. What roles are assigned to the systems in Logical Components? I believe they are setup as Target Systems and thats why you get the pop-up with both systems when you execute 'Logon action' after 'Development Completed'
3. What is the STMS setup for this landscape?
4. Urgnt should behave properly coz it takes the shortest route to production. Can you check the tasklist of Urgnt and see if there are only 3 systems there?
Regards,
Kriti Bhalla

CHARM with a 2 system landscape

Hello ,
we have only a 2 system landscape for our ERP systems.
When I now click on the check button on the maintainance project. I receive an error :
No consolidation system found for DEV-001 (project TEST_CHARM)
No track for project TEST_CHARM with log. system P23/001
Message from function module /TMWFLOW/CHECK_PRJ_CONS: No export system for DEV-001
TMS ( without any client routes)
DEV->PROD
Any suggestions ?
Regards

Hi Daniel,
we are using CHaRM in various transport landscapes with 2 and up to 5 systems. This is all working fine. Please make sure there is a consolidation transport route from DEV, also all RFC connections from Solution Manager to your Transport Landscape are set up, inlcuding 000 clients.
TMS settings need CTC=1, and Trusted Services in STMS need to be activated.
Other prerequsites are:
- Systems are deined in SMSY
- Transport Domain link between Transport domain controllers
- Logical components defined in SMSY (with correct system roles)
- Lofical component added to SMI project
If this is all fine, please hit button "Shipment Routes" in SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN in tab page "System Landscape" => "Systems" You should see all transport routes required for this project.
If this works, you are in a good shape.
Best Regards,
Holger Slomka

SolMan ChaRM - System landscape not ready yet

Hi all,
We are configuring ChaRM for an implementation use, therefore all the systems are not set up yet.
Is it possible in SolMan to define logical component without "real" systems ?
We saw that in STMS it was possible to create virtual systems, but how do we link these virtual systems to SolMan ChaRM ?
Is it possible to define a virtual system landscape and to build and configure ChaRM scenario with this ?
Thanks a lot for all your help,
Regards.

Yes, it is possible to define a development system and virtual systems (Q- and P-System).
Via transaction SMSY you can describe the planned Q- and P-System at first as 'virtual'.
Create transport routes with transport buffers as you would do for existing systems.
Define the buffers as they should be named in future.
For experimental purposes we connected our IDES-System to our development SolMan system.
In this environment we could map such a ChaRM-configuration.
In the meantime we practiced it in our production SolMan system, too.
Best regards
Horst

2 System Landscape to 3 System Landscape

Hi Gurus,
We have 2 systems (DEV and PRD) now we want to introduce a QAS system and make our landscape to a 3 system landscape.
can guys please give us the step by step procedure for this? and how many hours this process will take?
Thanks
Vignesh P

Hi,
For the implementing the landscapes, ypu have to install the OS , DATABASE, R3 again. after that you have to do the stms configersation, after installation steps just like se06, applying license, the system copy from production. then you can use the newly installed system as pre-production or qas system.
with regards,
Harish Reddy

You do not have permission to view the System Landscape Directory.

Hello there,
When I accessed my SLD from portal, it took me to the page but kept saying:
- You do not have permission to view the System Landscape Directory. Minimum required: UME role with permission com.sap.lcr.LcrUser and J2EE role LcrUser. See the SLD Post-Installation Guide for details
- SLD not configured; configure the SLD in Administration first.
I searched on these forums for the above error. Got some results, but nothing really substantial that has helped/fixed my problem.
I also read a bit on SLD from the pdf file named: System Landscape
Directory of SAP NetWeaver 2004s
I also worked on the security roles and actions to individual
users or user groups like for ex: the above pdf file advised I map the security roles from Visual Administrator, to the created roles in the portal. I've done that too. Like create a user group: 'SAP_SLD_ADMINISTRATOR' and create a user role corresponding to it, which would be: 'LcrAdministrator'
Then, I went to visual administrator, and clicked on 'Assign User Groups to Roles'
Even after this, I tried to access the SLD from portal: It is still giving me the same error I mentioned above in bold italics.
Can somebody please help me how to fix this issue?
Thanks
Dino.

Graham:
Thank you very much for making the effort to reply to my query.
But, it still hasnt solved my problem yet.. for some reason even though I followed your instructions and did what you advised.
I have attached a screenshot of my Visual Administrator screen that you advised me to modify/change.
Here it is: http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/2259/screenshot002co1.jpg
After I made the changes, I restarted the J2EE server and went to my portal SLD page: [http://org-x:50000/sld]
Tried authenticating usernames: LcrAdministrator and Administrator.
Both attempts resulted in the same error show below:
- You do not have permission to view the System Landscape Directory. Minimum required: UME role with permission com.sap.lcr.LcrUser and J2EE role LcrUser. See the SLD Post-Installation Guide for details
- SLD not configured; configure the SLD in Administration first.
I am wondering, if you would have another workaround regarding this issue, can you please let me know?
Thanks
Dino.

SOLMAN 4.0 SR2 connect to SAP R/3 Three System landscape (DEV QA and PRD)

Hi,
We have successfully installed SOLMAN 4.0 SR2 (ABAP + JAVA) on
WIN2003 SP2 EE MSSQL 2005 EE SP1.
I just want to activate the service so that SOLMAN could see my existing SAP R/3 4.6 C Three system landscape (DEV QAS PRD).
I heard settings should be done on SPRO IMG configs. Could anyone tell me the exact procedure to navigate on it. I see a lot of buttons to config and execute, Just want to make sure everything will be in order.
My SLD is directly installed locally on my SOLMAN server.
Thanks,
Simoun

Hello Simoun,
Telling from your last sentence I assume that you would like to connect SolMan (transaction SMSY) to your locally installed SLD or in other words: replicate SLD system data into SOLMAN system landscape SMSY.
Please check this document:
http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000538663&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000202&_OBJECT=011000358700000530282007E
Here you find information covering prerequisites, required SAP Solution Manager IMG configuration to connect SLD and SMSY and frequently ask questions (FAQ-like).
I hope this helps you to get started.
Regards,
Doreen

Doubts in System Landscape Directory

Hello All,
I got some basic doubts in SLD.
Why do we need to store the information about the installed products and to be installed products in software catalog?
And, what is this techncal system?
After reading few help sites, what I understand is the following:
For example SAP is a product and CRM etc are the software components. We create the technical system for this product like for client 100 we create a technical system and for client 200 we create another technical system. And we give some logical names, called business sytems, to these technical systems.
My second question is, why do we need to create all these information(the information in SLD)? Why cant we directly create messages types, message interfaces etc and configure them in Integration directory without using the information in SLD like business system?
In Integration Directory, we say that the sender is one Business System and receiver is another business system. These business system are created based on some technical systems. These technical systems are based on some software components and product. This product and the software component might be a installed or non installed product. Then how do we can get the connection between the sender and the business system? Can you please explain me the idea behind considering the sender and reciever as business systems.
Can anybody please clear the above doubts?
Priya

Hi Priya,
SLD:
The System Landscape Directory of SAP NetWeaver (SLD) serves as a central information repository for your system landscape. A system landscape consists of a number of hardware and software components that depend on each other with regard to installation, software updates, and demands on interfaces.
- so talking about the working of an SLD, here if any information is required for the integration server regarding the systems(logical or physical) and the software (installed products) it refers to the SLD.
- to tell you about the other features it has....it captures the dimensions of the system landscape like solution dimension, transport dimension and technical dimension.
- putting it in short XI IS A CLIENT OF SLD
Also go thru this link and understand more about SLD <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/31/f0ff69551e4f259fdad799a229363e/frameset.htm">System Landscape Directory</a>

SOFTWARE CATALOG:
The SLD contains a Software Catalog of all installable SAP products and software components. The Software Catalog includes information about support packages and dependencies between the products and software components. This information is the basis for the description of the system landscape.
Also go thru this link and understand more about Software Catalog <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/a2/2999ef97ea2b4790165f9ca5c05c41/content.htm">Software Catalog</a>
TECHNICAL SYSTEM, BUSINESS SYSTEMS, SOFTWARE PRODUCTS:
Technical system correlates the software to the physical host on which it is installed
Or in other words Technical systems are application systems that are installed in your system landscape.
- they are actually the basis for defining the business systems.
- we assign a technical system to a business system to help the SLD make the appropriate association.
- the software products used by the business system are got from the technical system definition.
- to note 1 technical system can have more than one business system assigned to it....and as told the SLD make the appropriate association between them.
Also go thru this link and understand more about each of it:
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/24/8fa93e08503614e10000000a114084/content.htm">Technical Systems</a>
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/42/c817d9d2296bb2e10000000a1553f6/content.htm">Business Systems</a>
<a href="/people/sap.india5/blog/2005/11/03/xi-software-logistics-1-sld-preparation Preparation</a>
Regards,
Abhy

STMS 2 System Landscape

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for