Substitution rule: ania-aktiv with proj-plsez(t-code: CJ20N)

Hi,
I am trying to create a substitution rule in transaction OPSN. On project save ania-aktiv is to be substituted with proj-plsez based on a condition in t-code: CJ20N.
I am aware of the client specific user exits and i have successfully set substitution rule for another field( Copying standard program into a custom program and setting the configuration in SPRO).
I am facing problem to set substitution rule for ania-aktiv as these fields are not available in the exit. I could populate only PRPS and PROJ fields and not ANIA fields.
Can any one please give a solution for this.
Thanks in advance

I will suggest you to use <b>BADI PROJECTDEF_UPDATE</b>, Method <b>AT_SAVE</b>. Inside your implementation, you can call another function module to update ANIA fields.

Similar Messages

Substitution rule not working

Hi
The substitution rule for getting the desired Business place and Section code is not working in Transaction code MRIS, whereas this substitution rule is working in all other Transaction codes.
Please suggest.
Regards
Prakash

Bhanu,
Subsitution rule works when you are posting in Financial Accounting tables: BSEG and BKPF. FB60 and MIRO do that.
The report doesn't make post in mentioned tables to get substitution done. Please make sure if there is a existing call transaction or only a planning are being assigned.
regards

Substitution rule for FICO reconciliation

HI
we have activated FICO reconciliation.
During cost centre distribution cycle, we want to post the entries into seprate GL. To meet this requirement we have written substitution rule s follows:-
Pre-requisit - if GL code is XXXXXX and cost element is XXXXXX
Subsitution - GL code YYYYYY is constant
But while cost centre distribution, system still posting entries in sender GL / cost element where above subsitutuion is active in system.
please let us know the correction in above substitution.
Regards
DD

Hi
I dont think it so that it will work wil Substituting as GL = Constant Value.
In whihc table you are replacing GL = Constant Value?
If it is BSEG, then you need to write a user exit
BSEG-HKONT = your GL Account (please prefix ZERO to make the length of GL Account to 10)
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Vivek

Substitution rule: (CJ20N)Move PROJ-PLSEZ to ANIA-AKTIV based on condition

Hi,
    I am facing problem in creating a substitution rule in t-code OPSN. On project save in CJ20N PROJ-PLSEZ(finish date) is to be moved to ANIA-AKTIV (activation date).
    I am aware of the client specific user exits and i have successfully created a substitution rule for some other fields(Copying standard program RGGBS000 and setting the necessary configuration in SPRO). The problem is that ANIA structure is not available in the program. Could any one please help me out in solving this problem.
Thanks in advance
Rajesh

Dear Rajesh,
   The structure ANIA is not available in Substitution rule. You have to find some other exit to achieve your objective.
   I'm sending a comprehensive list of exits in tcode OPSN. Also try finding some BADI.
Transaction Code - OPSN                     Edit PS substitution rules
Exit Name
Description
CNEX0002
PS Authorization check
CNEX0006
PS customer specific fields project definition
CNEX0007
PS customer specific fields WBS element
CNEX0009
Material components in network
CNEX0011
BOM explosion in network on component overview
CNEX0012
Derive external network number from WBS number
CNEX0014
External data for BOM transfer
CNEX0015
Change BOM data for BOM transfer
CNEX0016
PS customer-specific fields in the network headerf
CNEX0017
Customer-specific node info. in network graphic (netw. mnt.)
CNEX0018
Customer-specific node info. in network graphic (info. sys.)
CNEX0019
Customer-specific node info. in network graphic (std. netw.)
CNEX0020
Extra info in DIN field of network graphic (netw. maint.)
CNEX0021
Extra info in DIN field of hierarchy graphic (netw. maint.)
CNEX0022
Extra info in DIN field (standard network maintenance)
CNEX0023
Customer-specific node info. in the hierarchy graphic
CNEX0024
Customer-specific graphic title in Gantt chart/Proj.Plan.Brd
CNEX0025
Additional field for project summarization
CNEX0028
Check activity release
CNEX0029
Check network release
CNEX0030
Update event for BOM assignment
CNEX0033
WBS: Predefine Search and Replace String
CNEX0034
Check a New Allocation in BOM Transfer
CNEX0035
Check a Change in BOM Transfer
CNEX0036
Check deletion as part of BOM transfer
CNEX0037
Check a freshly created component
CNEX0038
Check a changed component
CNEX0039
Check deletion of a component in a network
NWTM0001
Set Field Contents for Event Date Type
NWTM0002
Display source document
NWTM0003
Structure of the Objects for Monitoring Dates
No of Exits:         31
Regards,
Deva.

Automate MSS substitution rule activation with 'Fill In'

Hi,
I have a question about the substitution, shipped with EhP7. There is the possibilty to add the rule as 'Fill In'.
If I add the rule, the substitute will get the information in his overview directly. This option does not look at a maintained absence in infotype 2001?
The reason for my question is the following:
I would like to automate the activation of the rule, when the system (or especially a report) does detect an absence in infotype 2001. Only if that is the case, the rule should be activated. The result of this procedure is, that the substitution rule only has to be added once initially (of course for one substitute).
I read different articles and the part of the HR600-course-material. With that and my testing in a system, I think that there is no such automation I described. Am I right?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards from Germany
Christian

yes you are correct, FIll in means, any unexpected absence of the manager, a substitutue who is predetermined to take over tasks will do the approval for critical tasks. This is how its intended to be and as such its not automated. You can look at BADI WF_SUBSTITUTE if you want to include some checks, you ll find lots of docs on it

UWL - Substitution Rule with END date

Dear All,
When user creates substitution rule in UWL, assignee can select Start Date. We want to have end date too.
But as the documentation of UWL says: All substitution rules created have no expiration date (end date) is limitation of UWL.
Can we implement this on our own using some APIs or some other option?
Please suggest.
Thanks and Regards,
Vinod Patil

Dear Vinod Patil,
Do you have an answer to your question?
Pls. let us know if you find something.
BR
Richard

In Substitution rule view only one task "All" is coming

Hi! All,
I am facing very strange problem in UWL. Recently we upgraded our SAP Portal from SP10 TO SP15 but in Manage Substitution Rule view under Assign these task drop down we are getting only one task i.e 'All'. Remaining 3 tasks are gone.
Can you help me in resolving this issue please..
Thanks and Advance.
Thanks and Regards,
M.D.Sahu

Hi,
You had upgrade from SP10 to Sp25, wich version? 6.40 or 7.00?
Please find for OSS notes from
UWL 6.40 SP15
UWL 7.00 SP15
for example, I don't have your portal version, I can't help much more on this. I worked with the UWL, and this I'd very issues with Substitution Rules...
BR
Joã

500 internal error in managhe substitution rule in UWL

Hi All,
One user is getting 500 internal error when cklicks on manage substitution rule in UWL.Only one user is facing this problem.
I checked in backend system, so substitute exists.
Can some body help me what could be the problem? Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Thirun.

Hi Thirun,
This is a common issue and usually has to do if the 'substitutee' for lack of a better word, is no longer a valid user.
4. When there is a substitution rule connecting the current user to a
deleted user, the following problems were discovered:
   - substitution rule management returns 500 browser error;
   - it is not possible to delete a Java Workflow substitution which
refers to a deleted user as assignee;
   - Java workflow connector is not able to retrieve items for user that
has a substitution rule with a deleted user;
   - The "status", "What to do", "assignee" and "Task Owner" fields are
not properly filled in the Manage Substitution Rules view.
Do a search in SAP notes in component EP-BC-UWL and also for your version. Alternatively you can let me know the version here and I can tell you in what release this is fixed in that matches closest to your version. (maybe only a patch required).
Beth Maben
EP - Senior Support Consultant
AGS Primary Support, Business Suite & Technology
Please see the UWL Wiki @
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/bpx/uwl+faq ***

Problem in UWL Substitution Rules

Hi all,
    I have created a Substitution Rules for user X from user Y. when user X logins and accepts for user Y's rules but he is not able see the rule above his UWL.
   But when I create a rule for some other user U from user Y, user U is able to get the rule above the users U UWL.
   Did anyone faced the same problem can help to solve.
Thanks in advance.
Ponnusamy

Have you ensured that the source person actually HAS items in their inbox?
Because of the way that task processing occurs you might also want to make sure that the source person hasnt already started processing the item. You should ensure that the task item is "released" in the backend - something as simple as opening the item could cause this. Once you open an item it is locked into your inbox - I dont believe from memory that these can then be substituted to someone else.
If all of that appears OK (and you can actually see the items mixed with your own) then I would suggest you check the properties of the iview and make sure that all "options" (like buttons etc) are turned on. In EP7.0 there is much more control over what is / isnt displayed to the end user. Those facilities (filters) you speak about "should" become visible when you have susbstituted items.

FB60 - Substitution rule to generate Text in automatic generated line item

Hello SAP genious,
While we post vendor invoice ( FB60) and customer invoice (FB70), at this time along with Dr and Cr line items one automatic additional line item is getting generated this is based on Tax type which you select while making invoice.
now, I want to show some text in this automatically created line items. This might be possible by creating some substitution rule but i am not sure.
and if it is possible through substitution rule then what could be my prerequisite, and check would be..?????
can you please tell how can i get Text in this additional line item getting created due to VAT tax code.
Thanks a Lot for your input.
your reply will be rewarded with points.
Thanks
Jignesh

Thanks for all your replies.
I Want the field BSEG- KOBEZ i.e description field in the accounting doc of the offsetting entry to be replaced in the GL account text field.
Ex :
PK    Account        Description                  Amount           Text
31    100000         Furniture Vendor             50             Sales
40    1999             Inter Compy                     50             Furniture Vendor
I want the description of offsetting entry vendor description i.e Furniture vendor (field BSEG-KOBEZ) to be replaced in GL line item text BSEG-SGTXT.
I cant find the field BSEG- KOBEZ while i search in the substituion to replace in Text field.
How do i write in substitution to say that the offsetting entry description should be in text field of GL account.

Substitution rule is not working correctly

Hi PS Gurus,
We have a problem in one of the newly created projects that the substitution rule is not working correctly; the data is not copied to the WBS element Cust. Enhancement tab.
Project 1 is working fine and the data is copied & Project 2 and Project 3 are not getting all the data copied to the WBS element,
In that project profile (substitution rule is given), substitution rule is also maintained
So please help why in one project substitution rule in working & other isnu2019t.
Many Thanks in Advance.
MM

Hello Menaka,
Select the WBS element in the project builder.
Cleck on Edit --> Validation Substitution --> Substitution
You will get the list of Substituitions, Double click on the required Substition rule.This action will generate a log, whether substitution has been succesfully caried out or with some error.
Kindly provide us that error log to guide you further.
Regards
Ravi

PO down payment is not picking FI substitution rule.

Hi All,
We have an issue with PO down payment and clearing. We have a
substitution rule on line item level as per company code were default profit
center is set. But while doing ME2DP, profit center is picking from PO account
assignment and overriding our substitution rule. We did try with complete
document substitution rule also but not worked.
Clearing of the pre-payment is deriving the profit center of
the account assignment on the PO, overriding our profit center substitution.
This is only happening with PO down payment. Please let me
know any solution.

Hi Rakesh
If the Down payment GL you are referring to is a Balance sheet account, your substitution should work.. How have you written your substitution? Can you give a screen shot?
But if you are referring to the Down Payment Cost Element assigned against your Controlling area, system is correct... For a cost element, PC is always derived from the associated CO object
br, Ajay M

BPM and Substitution rule (Delegate mechanism)

can we create substitution rule (Delegate mechanism )using BPM

Hi,
I have one scenario..!
If the user is on leave and and he is not submitting his task for more than 3 days automatically BPM has to redirect that task to another user with out any human involvement. Is it possible?? If so with what version.
Please help me on this.
Regards,
Krishnam

UWL Substitution Rule Issue

Hi All,
We are facing some issues with Substitution rule in UWL on NW portal 7.3 SPS08
Issue described below,
One user has created substitution rule by selecting task type "All" and "Fill In For me" option.
So, as per the standard process this is visible in assignee's login in UWL under "Other users' Sunstitution rule section".
But here problem is in this section there are two line items with same user name and task type, one for "Take Over" and another for "End Take Over".
But as these both are from same user and for "All" type of tasks, it should have only one entry. and both "Take Over" and "End Take Over" should be operated from one entry and two entries of same type is not required, Screenshot is attached here with,
We are required this to be sorted out asap, any help is appreciated...
Regards,
Bhavin Anajwala

Hello,
In continuation of my earlier...can you please check if Substitution from manager is Activated ?
SBWP -> Settings -> Workflow settings -> Activate/Deactivate Substitute....
If it is deactivated......then Login as secretary:
SBWP -> Settings -> Workflow settings -> Adopt Substitution....
Also goto TCode PFTC...
And check your TASK that is not coming in secratary inbox....
Select Additional data -> Agent Assignment -> Maintain data....
Select task and click on attributes.....
Make sure correct classification is mentioned for this task....it should be same to what has been delegated to secretary......
If are able to resolve the query then please let us know how...?
Edited by: Saurabh Agarwal on Jul 20, 2011 11:44 AM

UWL Guided Procedures and Substitution Rules functionality - how possible?

We are using Guided Procedures with Custom Web Dynpro objects and need to utilize user/role substitution that is easily enabled in other AdHoc tasks using 'Manage Substitution Rules. Unfortunately when creating and turning ON a substitution rule in the UWL all Guided Procedure Tasks are excluded and do not show up in the substituting person's UWL.
Does anyone have any ideas of how we can utilize Substitution Rules in UWL for all Guided Procedure tasks/steps?
Thanks in advance
-SteveW

Hi SteveW!
The situation you're facing is the normal behavior from GP in relation with substitution feature of UWL.
Unfortunately GP doesn't support substitution as the other UWL connectors do.
Best regards
Armando Zaro

Substitution rule: ania-aktiv with proj-plsez(t-code: CJ20N)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for