Summary Folder based on complex folder

Hi,
I am new to Discoverer.(10.1.2.48.18). Database 9i.
I created a summary folder based on complex folder.
When I created a worksheet using items from complex folder,
Discoverer is not using the summary folder.
Is I am doing something wrong?
Thanks for you help.

Adrian,
As a workaround (until 3.0.9 comes out), you could build a report component using the content area views, new in 3.0.8. For example:
select ...
from WWSBR_ALL_ITEM
where CREATEDATE >= sysdate-7
or UPDATEDATE >= sysdate-7
These views are secured, so users will only see what they are authorized to see.
One qualifier - you will need the patch to bug 1724250 to run these views. Please contact Oracle Support for the patch.
Regards,
Jerry
null

Similar Messages

How to Remove Nike +Ipod Tab from Itunes, Iphone Summary folder

I stupidly plugged in my Iphone 3Gs to a new Matrix Nike bike at the gym. When I sync'd my Iphone to my desktop Imac today I noticed this new tab (Nike +Ipod) in my Iphone summary folder menu tabs.
The built-in Nike app that is listed in settings on my Iphone is off. I'm not interested in tracking my workouts or anything from Nike. Just want the folder tab gone from Itunes.
How do I delete this tab from Itunes on my computer?
No more plugging it at the gym for me. Thanks for the help. Alice

I too tested out the nike+ and want to remove the tab that has now appeared in my iTunes summary!
I turned off the the app on my iPhone and still it appears. Nothing in Prefs either.

Invoke different Summary Screen based on attribute value

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to show different OPA landing summary page based on attribute value received from Siebel application. Is that possible?
For e.g.: Create 2 summary screen
Siebel field value opa_attr1 = A or B, if A I want to display summary screen 1 otherwise display summary screen 2.
Thanks,
Vinay

Thanks you for your reply. The link is not what I want. My case is that I already have a map stored in Oracle database under obiee_navteq schema. I want to use OBIEE to display map by adding different image/icon at different cities based on the value of an attribute column. All the examples I can find is to use measure column as an condition, not by attribute column.
Thanks

How to create a Service based on complex query

Hi,
I'm using JDev 11.1.2.2.0 for developing fusion based application based on EJB3.0 and JPA. I search on net and got a link for sample application as shown below:
http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/jdev/obe11jdev/ps1/ejb/ejb.html#t2s1
But above application is based on "Entities based on Tables" but my requirement to build a service based on query which contains multiple tables which means I want to create a generic one...
please let me know what I need to change or please provide any link for docs.

Hi Desmukh,
I want to create a wsdl for complex queries based on ADF fusion applicaiton using EJB3.0 and JPA...!
the link which you provided 'entity with tables' which is restricting for my requirement but I want similar implementation for complex queries :(

Report Designer - Summary page based on 3 queries with dynamic hierarchy?

Dear All,
I am trying to build a workbook based on 3 queries with a summary page that pulls in the query data into one page.
Each query is based on one key figure that is split by profit centre hierarchy.
i.e.
Turnover
-Profit Centre Node A
-Profit Centre Node B
-Profit Centre Node C
> Profit Centre C1
> Profit Centre C2
The user can dril-down into each query at whatever level of the PC Hierarchy they wish.
My issue is trying to structure a dynamic summary page that pulls in all rows from the individual queries regardless of the number of profit centre hierarchies contained in each. i.e. The summary could have 5 PCs for queries 1,2 & 3 in one execution, but then 10 for all queries in another execution.
Question:
Can report designer be used to make a dynamic summary sheet that will capture all rows from the individual query? or would an excel macro summary be the only way of doing this?

Hi Ingo,
After much testing and looking into trace etc. we have got this thing to behave as desired. Basically, following two things,
- no reference to CR Dynamic Hierarchy variable on report. There were places where this parameter was being refered and causing grief. We tested with brand new report.
- making sure that on query Cost center restriction is placed in Characteristic Restriction area of Filter tab of query, as oppose to default value area filter tab.
With above in place, the published report in infoview behave as desired, i.e. proper hierarchy structure in cost center prompt and group tree and only desired nodes showing on report.
Thank you for all you pointers
Regards
IMS

How to fetch the data records in summary format based on previous day

drop table T1;
create table T1(Class, Fees_Collected, Submit_Date) as select
'MBA', 100000, '7/30/2012' from dual union all select
'Btech', 20000, '7/10/2012' from DUAL union all select
'MBA', 45000, '8/1/2012' from dual union all select
'Btech', 55550, '7/31/2012' from DUAL union all select
'BBA', 250660, '7/30/2012' from dual union all select
'MBBS', 44556000, '7/31/2012' from DUAL union all select
'BDS', 420050, '8/1/2012' from DUAL union all select
'BBA', 30450, '7/30/2012' from DUAL union all select
'MBBS', 120450, '7/31/2012' from DUAL union all select
'BDS', 45950, '7/30/2012' from DUAL union all select
'MBA', 252450, '8/1/2012' from DUAL;My requirment is to fetch the records based on summary format to display the data with following columns -
Class |Prev Day Traded Value |Prev Day % of Total |Prev Day % MBA
Note - Previous Day definiton (Buisness Day) = calendar days - (weekends + US Holidays)
Kindly help me, as i want to keep it customized so that without specifying the hard coded dates ( Previous Day) it runs through and provide me the resultset....
All of your help and time is highly appericated.

You mean business days I guess ?
I use a function (I had to write it myself) <tt> next_business_day(p_start_date in date,p_days_count in number) return date </tt>
where I loop forward/backward from p_start_date according to the sign of p_days_count the required number of steps skipping weekends and holidays as the absolute value of p_days_count is mostly under 30 for the rest (at least around here) Oracle's <tt> add_months </tt> gets it done.
Regards
Etbin
Edited by: Etbin on 6.8.2012 17:55
Year till date: <tt> your_date between trunc(sysdate,'year') and sysdate </tt> is it ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year-to-date ?
Edited by: Etbin on 6.8.2012 18:27
NOT TESTED!
function next_business_date(p_start_date in date,p_count_days in number) return date is
steps number := abs(p_count_days);
retval date := p_start_date;
begin
if p_start_date is null or p_count_days is null then
 return to_date(null);
end if;
while steps > 0
loop
/* skipping weekends and (yet to be implemented) holidays */
 while to_char(retval,'dy') in ('sat','sun') /* or is_holiday(retval) */
 loop
 retval = retval + sign(p_count_days);
 end loop;
/* retval contains a business day now */
 retval = retval + sign(p_count_days);
 step := step - 1;
end_loop
return retval;
end;

Interactive report based on complex view

firefox 24 , apex 4.0 , db11gxe ,
hi all,
i created an interactive report with this code :
select c.client_id , c.client_name , c.age , c.email , c.phone ,
p.payment_date , sum(p.amount) "summary"
from clients c , payments p
where c.client_id = p.client_id
group by c.client_id , c.client_name , c.age , c.email , c.phone ,
p.payment_date;
but the problem was i could not delete any of the rows of the report , because there was no checkbox existed , so i created one with "apex_application.checkbox" , and i have got it now , but
i still can not delete any rows ,
i created a button to submit the page , and a process with this code
FOR i in 1..APEX_APPLICATION.G_F01.count
LOOP
DELETE FROM cp
WHERE client_id = APEX_APPLICATION.G_F01(i);
END LOOP;
and sure nothing was deleted , and i am facing this error
ORA-01732: data manipulation operation not legal on this view

What is the object "CP" ?
It sounds like it is a view. If it's the same you've used for the IR, then check out "key preserved views"
Oracle doc - http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28310/views001.htm#ADMIN11784
Tom Kyte - http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:6474092145067::::P11_QUESTION_ID:548422757486
There could be another issue once you address the error - depending on how you've defined apex_application.checkbox2 (the other is deprecated)
You may not be associating the correct value in g_f01

Summary Report based on Subreports or other Crystal Reports

We use several Detail Reports. Additional we want to create a summary Report where we can see certain values or totals of the Detail Reports.
Is there a way to combine this information with Crystal?

You can set the value in the subreport like this:
shared NumberVar orderamount;
orderamount := {Orders.Order Amount};
You can sho the set value in your main report using the following code:
shared NumberVar orderamount;
orderamount
Regards
Stratos

How to create multiple idocs based on complex condition

HI Users,
my scenario is jms(xml file) to idoc. for each file have multiple records for each record i need to create multiple idocs.
source structure:
<lineitem>
<student sid="cid">456</student>
<hreference>
<reference rtype="number">123</reference>
</hreference>
<hreference>
<reference rtype="number">789</reference>
</hreference>
<hreference>
<reference rtype="char">147</reference>
</hreference>
now condition is One input message must create only one output message for each unique rtype="number" and sid="cid" combination.
for example
1. rtype="number" and sid="cid" the value combination means 123456 for this one idoc
2. rtype="number" and sid="cid" the value combination means 789456 for this one idoc
--> the below file shows with out sid="cid"
<lineitem>
<student sid="abc">456</student>
<hreference>
<reference rtype="number">123</reference>
</hreference>
<hreference>
<reference rtype="number">789</reference>
</hreference>
<hreference>
<reference rtype="number">147</reference>
</hreference>
in this case we have to consider only rtype="number" so here we need to create 3 idocs.
Could anyone help me in this regard.
Thanks in advance

Hi Swathip,
Change the occurence of the IDoc to "unbounded", so that multiple IDocs can get create
Try with below logic
If (SID = "CID")
Then
 If(rtype = "number")
 concat(student,reference ) ---> removeContext ---> Idoc
Else
 rtype ---> removeContext ---> Idoc
If combination of unique student and reference can occur more than once in the XML, use sort command and splitByValue (Value Change)
Edited by: chandra shekhar on Jul 3, 2011 12:53 PM

Cannot create a summary based on remote objects

Has anyone ever come across this error when creating a summary folder for a warehouse, using a DB Link?
Does anyone know how to resolve this?

Hi
This is not a restiction of Discoverer, this is a SQL restriction, and it makes jolly good sense if you think about it.
You cannot create a materialized view across a database link. This is because the optimizer only works within its database. It cannot cross a database link because it will be interfering with the optimization of another database and thus will be unable to determine whether a query should be redirected. So if a query cannot be redirected, what's the point in having a materialized view, or, in Discoverer's language, a summary table?
How can you resolve this? Simple: you make sure that the summary and the objects upon which the summary will be based all exist within the same database.
I know this is probably not the answer that you wanted.
Best wishes
Michael

ORA-30353 while creating summary folders

I have received the database error above while trying to create summary folders using the wizard within discoverer 4.1.37 at 2 different clients.
I have tried both manually specifying the items to include and letting Discoverer make recommendation based on performance statistics. I raised a TAR and was told that I had to exclude any items columns like UID, USER, ROWNUM, SYSDATE, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, MAXVALUE from my folder. There may have been some of these at the first client as I was working with standard Oracle Apps tables, which use these extensively, but I am now at a second client, where I am trying to create a summary folder based on a complex folder made up of 7 items, the GL code combination ID and 6 segment values and their descriptions from fnd_flex_children. Even when I removed the code combination id from the summary, I still received the error.
Any thoughts or suggestions?

HI Chinar,
I have already checke the same and made the changes as per the metalink note.
But stil I am getting teh following error:
$ lsnrctl status ASM
LSNRCTL for HPUX: Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production on 30-JUL-2010 12:40:17
Copyright (c) 1991, 2006, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connecting to (DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=10.10.199.141)(PORT=6881)))
STATUS of the LISTENER
Alias ASM
Version TNSLSNR for HPUX: Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
Start Date 30-JUL-2010 11:36:11
Uptime 0 days 1 hr. 4 min. 5 sec
Trace Level off
Security ON: Local OS Authentication
SNMP OFF
Listener Parameter File /uat06/asm_home/network/admin/listener.ora
Listener Log File /uat06/asm_home/network/log/asm.log
Listening Endpoints Summary...
(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=10.10.199.141)(PORT=6881)))
Services Summary...
Service "+ASM" has 1 instance(s).
Instance "ASM", status BLOCKED, has 1 handler(s) for this service...
Service "+ASM_XPT" has 1 instance(s).
Instance "ASM", status BLOCKED, has 1 handler(s) for this service...
Service "ASM" has 1 instance(s).
Instance "ASM", status UNKNOWN, has 1 handler(s) for this service...
Service "PLSExtProc" has 1 instance(s).
Instance "PLSExtProc", status UNKNOWN, has 1 handler(s) for this service...
The command completed successfully
Why is it showing status "BLOCKED" if i check the listener status.

Errors while Creating Summary

While creating Summary on some of the folders based on custom views using ASM or mannually, I am getting this fine grain access policy error.
ORA-30372: fine grain access policy conflicts with materialized view
While creating Summary using query statistics, I am getting this following error.
ORA-30353: expression not supported for query rewrite
We are using Discoverer 10g. We have an APPS mode EUL and I am doing this by logging into Discoverer Admin as EUL owner, which is EUL_US. This user has all the previlages specified in Discoverer Admin Doc.
ORA-30372, I could figure out is the problem with tables HZ_ORGANIZATION_PROFILES and HZ_PERSON_PROFILES which I used in the view for the folder I need to summarize.
Tried creating materialized views on these folders seperately in SQL plus, but have the same error.
Can Somebody help me to get through this?

Hi
I am not saying you cannot use summaries but that you have to be aware of the underlying security. Most of the time you will need to use an external summary table not one that has been created for you by Discoverer.
The following snippet, which will help, is taken from the Oracle Business Intelligence Discoverer Administration Guide, found here: http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/html/B13916_04/orapps_supp.htm#sthref1165
As the Discoverer manager of an Oracle Applications mode EUL you must be aware of the following:
1. Some Oracle Applications database views contain row level security and return differing result sets depending upon the currently active responsibility. This means that materialized views (summary tables in Oracle Standard Edition databases) will contain different data depending on the responsibility of the user refreshing the external summary folder.
2. A summary folder based on an Oracle Applications secure view or Oracle Applications business view must be registered in Discoverer as an external summary folder (for more information, see Chapter 14, "How to create summary folders based on external summary tables").
3. Where an external summary folder is mapped against a table or view with Oracle Applications row level security, it is your responsibility as Discoverer manager to make sure the external table or view provides secure access. If you are not sure, ask your database administrator.
4. If a managed summary folder is found that satisfies a query (based on data with Oracle Applications row level security), Discoverer informs the end user that no rows satisfy the query criteria. Discoverer does this to ensure that end users do not see data they should not have access to.
5. If a managed summary folder is found that satisfies a query (based on data without Oracle Applications row level security), Discoverer returns the rows unaffected. Discoverer does this because the data can be safely accessed by all end users.
6. Some Oracle Applications views with row-level security support "public" rows (particularly Human Resources).
I hope this helps
Best wishes
Michael Armstrong-Smith
URL: http://learndiscoverer.com
Blog: http://learndiscoverer.blogspot.com

Discoverer 4.1 Summary creation hanging

Is anyone out there experiencing discoverer v4.1 or v3.1 hanging when creating summaries?
I have created summaries on both versions and when the progess bar states 'inialising summary creation...100%' it just hangs. I have left it in this state overnight in case there was some processes going on which I couldn't see but it was still hanging when I came back in the morning. Please help as the situation is getting desperate.
Maria

Gurman,
The Privilege that are required to create a Summary Folder using Materialized views are,
1. Query Rewrite.
2. Create Any Materialized View.
3. Drop Any Materialized View.
4. Alter Any Materialized View.
So Login into SQL*Plus as SYS User or SYSTEM User or as any DBA User and execute the below SQL,
SQL> Grant Query ReWrite, Create Any Materialize View, Alter Any Materialized View, Drop Any Materialized View to <EUL OWNDER>;
This will solve your issue.
Thanks,
Selva.
null

Invalid External Summary

Hi all,
"Invalid External Summary - External summary is referenced in the summary definition".
During creation summary folder with step-1 "I want to specify the summary meself". step-2 "Registering an external summary table". Step -3 I tried to mapped the item and got the error
And the "Have Discoverer recommend and create the best summaries" option slways disable in administrator. Please tell me how i can enable this option? I have granted all the priviliges according to the manual. Create table, view, procedures, alter, drop any materialized view etc.
Regards
Hassan

Hassan -- please identify the complete versions of Discoverer and the DB you are using.
Thanks,
Discoverer PM

Summary Tables Questions...

Hi to everybody,
I use Oracle Discoverer 10.1.2 and created some summary tables - using both methods : being specified by me and Discover automatically defined them....
I have two questions:
1) Is there any way to define the summary table(materialized view in the 'language' of Oracle Database ) in the application db user and not in the Discoverer Repository db owner.....????
NOTE: I have created the Discoverer Repository in a user , let's say EUL, whereas all referenced tables in the summary tables are owned in another user , say HIS...
Simply , I ask if a summary table can be created in the HIS dataschema and not in EUL.....
2)Is there any way to give the summary table a more meaningful name in the process of creating it..... I mean a name different from this one: EUL5_MV102497
Thanks , a lot
Simon

Hi Simon
As mentioned by Sabine, if you create the materialized views in the database you have full control. To answer your question I always build my summary tables in the schema of the user who owns the EUL.
However, I would have thought that you can do what you ask, but I'm not so sure. In theory, all you need to do in order to make this work is to make sure the EUL owner and the owner of the schema into where you want to insert the summary table has the following privileges:
These are the grants the EUL needs:
ALTER ANY MATERIALIZED VIEW
CREATE ANY MATERIALIZED VIEW
DROP ANY MATERIALIZED VIEW
ANALYZE ANY
These are the privileges needed by the user in whose schema you intend to create the materialized view:
CONNECT
RESOURCE
GLOBAL QUERY REWRITE
With these privileges granted you should be able to create summary tables inside Discoverer and have full control over the schema in which the materialized view is created and the name of the materialized view. I say should be able to because it doesn't seem to work. Please read on.
To control the MV schema and name, I should be able to use this workflow:
1. When you are in the manual summary folder process, you will come to a screen that allows you to maintain Combinations.
2. From the Combinations screen, highlight a combination and click the Properties button.
3. The Database Storage Properties dialog box will open.
4. In the Database Storage Properties dialog box, use the drop-down alongside the Table Owner and switch this to be a user who has the privileges mentioned earlier.
Note: the drop-down is not visible until you click in the Table Owner box
5. Click in Table Name (this is the name of the materialized view) and change it to a name that complies with your naming standards.
6.Change any other properties you wish, then click OK.
7. Click Finish to complete the summary folder.
At this point, even though I had granted the Global Query Rewrite to the other user, Discoverer Admin stopped and reported that the user needed this privilege. I was therefore unable to complete the summary folder process. Interestingly enough, the materialized view was actually created but I, as the owner of the EUL, was unable to use it. This is because in order for the EUL owner to be able to use an existing MV / Table that is owned by someone else, the other user needs to have run a grant like this:
GRANT SELECT ON MY_MV TO EUL_OWNER WITH GRANT OPTION
But how can this be done because the table is being created by me? The problem therefore is that only the owner of the MV can grant this but when you are inside Discoverer Admin you are not logged in as that user. I therefore am suspicious that, despite Discoverer having a screen to do so, it is not possible to create a summary table in someone else's account.
Has anyone been able to make this work?
In summary though, if the intention is to produce a materialized view that everyone can use then the above doesn't appear to work. However, it looks like you are able to create a materialized view within a user's schema that is only available to that user. This opens up the interesting possibility that you could create different materialized views for different users, thus giving users individual copies and potentially different copies of the data.
It would be interesting if someone were to test this out and report back. My only concern would be that once created, because it is the EUL owner who has the ALTER and DROP privileges, how would the schema owner update it? As I say, this is an interesting conumdrum.
Personally, as stated at the beginning, I always create my summary folders (aka materialized views) in the EUL owner's schema.
I hope this helps
Best wishes
Michael Armstrong-Smith
URL: http://learndiscoverer.com
Blog: http://learndiscoverer.blogspot.com

Summary Folder based on complex folder

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for