Suppress Confirm for Move-MailboxDatabase

Exchange 2013 CU6
I need to change the log file location for 70 DBs. I have a Powershell command to do so, however I keep getting prompted for the Confirmation. I can't suppress it for my command, nor just a simple one DB command. 
This is what I am running:
Move-DatabasePath -Identity MDB37 -LogFolderPath m:\databases\mailbox\MDB37 -ConfigurationOnly -Confirm:$False
This is what I get:
Confirm
This operation will skip the safety check and make the change to Active Directory directly. Do you want to continue?
[Y] Yes  [A] Yes to All  [N] No  [L] No to All  [?] Help (default is "Y"): n
Am I missing something? This seems like something that should be easy.....it hasn't been so far. 

Lynn is right, Confirm parameter suppresses any acknowledgement that is required while Force parameter suppresses any Administrative inputs that are required (eg. make the AD change, dismount the database etc...)
Also make sure that you mount the database after this, as moving log path will dismount the DB...
Amit Tank | Exchange - MVP | Blog:
exchangeshare.wordpress.com 

Similar Messages

  • Hide/Suppress Cost center field in MIGO and MB1A for movement types 551&552

    Hi All,
    Can anybody tell me how to suppress or hide the cost center field in MIGO or MB1A for movement types 551 and 552?
    I did below settings and it worked fine for only MB1A and for MIGO still it is showing cost center field.
    IMG > Materials Management > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory >Goods Issue/Transfer posting > Define screen layout > select movement type to change the option.
    Also I did gothrough the settings for Enjoy transaction (MIGO) there we have only option to make fields either  "Required entry" or "Optional entry" and we don't have an option to hide/suppress.
    Please advise or help me .
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards,
    Praveen

    Hi
    The cost center field is a required field in mvt type 551 as you are scrapping materials, some cost center will need to take the cost of this operation.
    Anyway, you first need to make the field as optional for example, before you move.
    One option is that you create a screen variant in Tcode SHD0 for MB1A, where 551 is setup as constant (with content) , and mark Cost center as invisible and assign this screen variant to a transaction in SE93.
    regards
    Sidi

  • Automatic TO creation and confirmation for a Material document

    Hi Dear All,
    i am new to MM andWM.
    I have to customization for auto transfer orders and confirmations for material documents what ever created with 101 movement type in Inventory Management. I have down configuration like below.
    SPRO->Logistics Execution->Warehouse Management->Activities->Transfers-> Set Up Autom. TO Creation for TRs / Posting Change Notices
    Double click on ‘control data ‘tab
    Hear for my warehouse I given input like   Auto TO = ‘1’,
                                                                             AddId = ‘select check box’.
    And in ‘Assign control’ tab for 101 movement type I have given input like below.
    Automatic TO = ‘1’.
    TO item can be confirmed immed. = ‘tick checkbox’
    Propose Confirmation = ‘tick checkbox’.
    Foreground/Backgrnd = ‘D’.
    After creating of Material document I am executing report RLAUTA10 in SE38.When I execute this report system showing message like ‘TO processing finished: TR total:   17, TO created:    0, Errors:   17’.
    If I check header details of transfer requirements in LB03, i am not seeing ‘Tick Mark’ in Auto TO Creation field.
    Can any one tell me what the mistake i have down or if i need to do any further configuration. Please help me regarding this concern?
    Thanks in Advance..

    Dear Steve,
    Thanks a lot for giving reply with what I need to do, but I am unable to see result.
    I have down configuration like below even though system not processing Auto TO creation. Can you explain me if I have down any mistake below.
    Click on ‘Assign’ button,
    Press on ‘New entries’
    WhN = ‘900’
    Reference Movement Type = ‘101’
    Movement indicator = ‘B’
    Movement type for Whse Mgmt = ‘101’
    TR create Transfer Requirement = ‘X’
    Immed.TO Creation
    Mail confirmation for background processing = ‘01’.
    GR date = ‘2’

  • Automatic TO Creation and Confirm for the 321 Mvt type

    Hello Experts,
    Like to know the customisation invovlved for automatic TO creation and confirmation for the 321 movement type in which QM is activated.
    I have already activated in OMKZ as below
    1.Automatic TO for 321 mvt ytpe
    2.TO item to be confirmed immediately
    3.Propose confirmation
    Table T333 -AUTTA
              T333-SQUIT &
              T333-VQUIT is activated.
    Please let me know any other settings to be performed
    Regards
    Krishna

    Hello Experts,
    I am trying to create the Automatic TO and TO confirmation for the mvt type 321.
    I made the below settings
    I have activated in OMKZ as below
    1.Automatic TO for 321 mvt ytpe   -"A"
    2.TO item to be confirmed immediately  - tick mark
    3.Propose confirmation   - tick mark
    Table T333 -AUTTA
    T333-SQUIT &
    T333-VQUIT is activated.
    I have activated in OMKX as below
    Table T321-TBFKZ Immediate TO Creation with "A"
    T321-TAFKZ TR creation with "X"
    After doing the settings i am not able to see the Posting change number in the Material document created for the mvt type 321.
    Please let me know how to create the Posting chnage notice for the material document and how to convert the Posting change notice to automatic TO and confirmation.
    Thanks & Regards
    Krishna
    Edited by: Hariharan krishna on May 25, 2011 8:01 AM

  • Issue with Return Delivery for movement type 262

    Hi,
    I have got a strange issue, the user is trying to do a MIGO Return Delivery for a material document using movement type 262, this he claims has been doing it for many materials. However when i go to the MKPF table i see the transaction Code field to be MIGO_GI for all the material documents for which he claims to have done return delivery. But under this transaction code we have only 4 options - Display, Issue, Cancel and Remove from storage.
    Now when he tries to do the return delivery for movement type 262 he get an error message "Check table T156N: entry RL 262  does not exist" , but this has been very well maintained in the table.
    Can you please let me know -
    If it is possible to do a return delivery for a movement type 262?
    If yes how to address the above error encountered.
    Thanks in advance
    Sachin

    Hi Sachin,
    If you think of return delivery to vendor with or w/o PO reference you can use movement types 161, 122, 124 as default settings.
    Movement type 261 means withdrawal against production order and its reverse is MVT 262. The latter can be used e.g. via MB1A (or you can make storno of a confirmation by 261).
    Are you sure your user is using the correct terminology ('return delivery')? Please check the material documents he/she claims to have booked as return delivery. (in MB51 you can get a list of all material movements of MVT 261 that belong to 'your user' and after that you can open the material document and check through which transaction the booking was made.)
    BR
    Csaba

  • I rented a movie in iTunes and connected my iPad to transfer the movie to the iPad.  The rental section will not pop-up and I have confirmed the movie is not an HD movie.  Any suggestions on what to do next?

    I rented a movie in iTunes and connected my iPad to transfer the movie to the iPad.  The rental section will not pop-up and I have confirmed the movie is not an HD movie.  Any suggestions on what to do next?

    I would ask iTunes Store support for help with this. You may never be able to get the movie to download on your own now.
    Go here and then tap on Connecting and downloading, then tap on Movie Rentals. You can have someone contact you, you can chat online or you can get email support. I would opt for the phone call or online chat.
    https://getsupport.apple.com/Issues.action

  • Inspection lot creation for Movement type 531

    Dear experts,
    following is the procedure
    1) Material enter against purchase order SFG
    2) Quality checks that and send to unrestricted (its an sampling inspection)
    3) Issue this material against production order
    4) order is confirmed and GR is done for FG
    5) FG material goes to quaity for inspection
    6) At the time of inspection of FG it is found that FG is rejected because of vendor material
    so we keep that stock in blocked stock. now we create an salvage order by CO07 and issue FG and received SFG vendor material by 531 movement
    now my prob is i want to record the defect against vendor material because of which it is rejected and my clint wants the report on reson basis
    regards
    Sachin

    go to OMBS... Here you need to do two things..
    1. control reason..here u can mention reason for movement for 531 is requied or optional etc..
    2. reason for movement..here u need to maintain the reasons as per ur wish..
    like 101---damaged
    107--- scratched
    etc..
    If all these are set, then only you can enter the reasons in the MB11 screen and the same can be viewed in MB51 by adding the reason in the layout...
    karthick
    Edited by: karthick PP on Jun 4, 2009 5:21 AM

  • BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE for movement type 161, issues in PO creation

    Hello Gurus,
    I am using movement type 161 with BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE in order creating a vendor PO based on the goods receipt posted with the BAPI.
    It works fine, nevertheless due to business requirements, I need to apply the following changes:
    - in SAP standard the order type is NB by default but in our case I would like to force another order type using the same range that NB. I guess this could be done by activating exit ZXM06U17 (MM06E003). Does someone could confirm it?
    - in our process, the purchasing group is not maintained at vendor level (LFM1-EKGRP) but as this field is mandatory in the PO creation and as this data can not be maintained in BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE, does someone know if it would be possible to force this value during the PO creation (EKKO-EKGRP) based on a maintenance table? If yes in which user-exit? Exit ZM06U43 could be used?
    - furthermore, our specific PO type should have a specific account assignement EKPO-KNTTP instead of the default value U, does someone know if it would be possible to force this value during the PO creation (EKKO-EKGRP) based on a maintenance table? If yes in which user-exit? Exit ZM06U43 could be used?
    Kind regards
    Chris

    Hi Priya,
    Just want to share with your guys how to fit this error in BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE.
      For movement type 161 of PO return you have to pass movement type 101 instead of 161
    goodsmvt_item-bwart = 101. After that standard function will determine 101 to 161 automatically and
    post that material doc.
    NOTE:
      In my case
      It just heppen only the FIRST time that you do movement with PO Return wich is needed to pass
    101 in stead of 161 but after that you can pass 161 the system will continue process correctly.
    Hope it help.
    Sayan.

  • Report RFDUZI00 claims about entry for movement type CREIR

    Hello,
    we have moved from R/3 4.6 to ECC 6.0. Now we have some errors coming up in FI module.
    One is this:
    Report RFDUZI00 (debitor interest calc. run) ends with a comment before posting:
    "For movement type CREIR and interest attribute 01 the table of time dependent interest conditions is not maintained" (message translated from german).
    We had to add this entry in transaction OB81 to get rid of this issue.
    In 4.6 we didin´t need this entry to run the report successful.
    We have checked and did not find any comments in release notes.
    Question: Can anybody confirm to this new requirement of the system, which looks like RFDUZI00 or dependent include etc. was enhanced to check entries for creditors (for which reason?).
    Possibly we found the answer in OSS 670117, which explains changes in RFDUZI00 relevant since R/3 4.7.
    Regards
    Dirk
    Message was edited by:
            Dirk Meinhard

    Solved on my own!

  • Layout for movement type 101 (MB01)

    Hi experts,
    1) I would like to know more on how can I define the layout for MB01 other than using screen variant?
    2) Also, I would like to know more on how can I define layout for movement type lower than 201?
    I can only do that for movement type > 201 in SPRO.
    Thanks and regards,
    JT

    Hi Parag Mahajan,
    Just want to double confirm with you about this.
    What if I want to grey a field or make it available for user to make changes to a grey field?
    My problem is tcode MB01, the Document Date field was grey and defaulted to today's date. I want to make it available and allow user to change the document date.
    Thanks and regards,
    JT

  • Destination plant, description, material are editable for movement type 313

    Hello
    We are using movement type 313 for the transfer posting between storage location. We use MIGO for the same.
    Ideally for the movement type 313, the destination plant and material should not be visible. We enter the material, batch,plant and storage locaiton in "From" side and enter only the storage location in "To" side of the MIGO screen. But now suddently after the EHP4 upgrade, we could able to enter the plant and materil in the "To" side also.
    I checked the Field selections in OMJJ for movement type 313 and found that plant and material fields are suppressed.
    Do you have any clue on why suddenly i am facing this problem and what could be possible solution.
    Thanks
    Venkat.

    Sounds like you're just dumping your spec here. What have you tried exactly to solve this yourself?
    Thomas

  • Inspection point qty confirmation for operation - INprocess Inspection

    Hi Experts,
    After doing partial confirmation in the Result recording, the partial confirmed qty moves down to the next operation and is confirmed. But using QM result recording when I try to post the next partial qty, the system cancels the previous confirmation although the next operation has been confirmed for the partial qty. And I am able to confirm the full qty for the operation
    How to avoid this situation ?
    Regds
    Jomy

    Dear Jomy,
    Please use 150 as the inspection point in your routing header.
    But please make sure that in configuration you have this maintained.
    SPRO>QM> Quality planning > inspection planning > general > define identifier for inspection point> select the inspection point you are using >double click> function module> maintain in Automatic creation of insp. Points > maintain this function module QAPP_CUST_IP_CREATE > tick the use function module
    Test with a  new order and lot.  Each time you go for RR it will go for new partial lots. So confirmation will get added up as in  co11n process.
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    gajesh

  • Confirmation for ECC Return PO

    Hi All,
    I am looking for some clarifications. I can able to process confirmation in SRM (through Central goods/services transaction) for a PO created only in ECC. If I do any partial confirmaiton, then the remaining quantity will be available for further confirmation.
    But this is not happening for ECC Return PO (PO where Return box is checked). I could able to process only one confirmation for that return item in SRM and it posts a goods movement with 161 mvt type in ECC. But after that, this return item is not available for further confiramation in SRM. That line itself is not there in the item overview screen of confirmation.
    Has anyone come across this poblem? Can you please help me to undertsand the issue here?
    Thanks,
    Arun

    Hi
    You can use any of your existing purchasing group to create a return PO.
    Thanks

  • Confirmation for PM order

    Hi PM Expert,
    When i am creating confirmation for PM order, system do a goods movement as a automatic without  ticking goods movement  button. How to set consumption after ticking goods movement  and save button.
    Regards,
    Aktolga

    Hi,
    Please ensure you have not enabled back flushing in component tab,by which material would be issued automatically.
    Regards,
    Sudhakar

  • Block ttransfer order confirmation for storage types:

    Gurus,
    IS there any functionality in WM to vlock the transfer order confirmationfor particluar storage type.
    I know LS06 but that wil not allow to create Transfer order.
    I need transfer order to be creaed but it should get confirmed.I am not referrring to the set up in movemet type also.
    If not how can we achieve this
    Please help this is urgent
    BR
    Avinash

    Can you explain in detail what you want achieve, I guess you are looking for the wrong solution.
    A TO is confirmed when the material which is to be moved from A to B has reached B.
    What sense does it make to have a TO, to perform the movement, and finally not beeing able to confirm this movement?
    even further, an unconfirmed TO prevents the quant from becoming available for any usage.
    if you dont want that one can put a material into B then you should restrict the putaway into B, which means a TO for destination B cannot be created.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Looking for a simple drag & drop apps to slow motion a Video?

    I'm doing a project with school kids that involves numerous iterations on building small structures out of balsa wood and taking them to breaking point to discover where the weakness lies in the design. I'm a FCPx and imovie user, but would really li

  • Error "  is not a time unit" while updating table that is Copy of CATSDB

    Hi, We have created a new table which is a copy of CATSDB and has some more Fields in it. While inserting records to the table, it is throwing the error saying "  is not a time unit". Can you please provide some info on this ? This is a complete cust

  • Macbook Al (2008) on Vizio VW32L

    Have a Mini-Displayport to DVI-D adapter and bought the Belkin DVI-D to HDMI cable. Have it connected to my Vizio VW32L and the picture displays, however, it seems like the colors are not displaying right. The port is HDCP compliant. Its almost like

  • 7.6.03 Build 015-123 Installation error in Vista 64 bit

    Hi I encountered the following error while installing on Vista 64. Please help. Thank you INSTALLER_INFO: Version = 7.6.03 Build 015-123-173-107 INSTALLER_INFO: Changelist = 173107 INSTALLER_INFO: MakeId = 282844 INSTALLER_INFO: Type = kit SYS_INFO:

  • System Freeze after Waking from Sleep

    Hi, I have seen a few other posts out there with similar issues however mine is a little different. I have been noticing a few oddities since updating to Mac OS X.5, and finally X.5.1. The first challenge I noticed was that my machine does not go to