Suppressing Warning msg- Vendor NAME2 field

Hi ,
While creating vendor master , if the name2 field of the vendor is more than 35 characters we get a warning message saying "The use of last five characters in name2 field is restricted".The customer wants me to suppress this message.Please let me know if there will be any impact if this warning message is suppressed ?I want to ensure that this does not create any other issue.

Hi,
I'm fully agree with Jurgen & Vinay, however if your Customer insist on this request ...
You can deactivate the check by activating the message AM228 with trx. OBA5 :
                                                                                a) Transaction code OBA5 (customization)
b) Application area AM (Central Address Management)
c) Insert the following record:-
      MsgNo    : 228
      Online   : -
      BatchI   : -
      Standard : W
d) Finally, please save the record.
Regards,
Mauro

Similar Messages

Arabic Text in Vendor Address field Name2

Hi
My user wanted to enter Arabic Text in vendor address field NAme2 Field . Now i have to print that Arabic text on smart form .
it appears ################### in this way kindly help me out
Regards
ammad

Make sure your output device is tied with device type I6SWIN(Arabic SWIN saplpd 4.22+).
Also check whether your printer is uni-code enabled or not.
Regards,
SaiRam

Sales order- Warning msg Static credit check

Hi, SAP Guru,
When I create a order & saving it ...a POP UP comes with warning msg the static credit limit exceeds..... Can any one please let me know the how I can remove the warning POP UP . As client do not want any pop up should come while saving the order.
Please help.
Thx & regards

Hi,
If you remove the entry from the field "Check credit" in "OVAK" T.Code,the credit check will not happen for this order type.Which we don't want.
We need that the credit check should happen but the pop-up is to be removed.right?
For this goto the T.Code "OVA8".
Select your valid entry.Details.
Remove the value as "blank" for the field "Reaction".Press F4 for more options.
Beside this there is one more field "status/block" which is ticked means the order will be blocked for further transactions.And also status will be updated accordingly.
These blocked order have to be released either by using the T.Code "VKM3/VKM1".
Regards,
Krishna.

Transport datasource 0FI_AP_4 on R3 gets warning msg

RSA6 on R3 and select the datasource 0FI_AP_4, click the truck picture icon which is "Transport datasource", get a warning msg:
"Warnings have occurred (see log)", click the question mark for log, but still get the same short msg. What could be the reason?
The reason why we are doing this is that we found a new field added to the structure and correspondingly the datasource fails to show up in the target system after transported.
Thanks

Hi,
If your ES in DEV has more filed than ES of QA/PROD , then yiou need to release and import the transport request of that change to ES.
Without tranporting the change to ES first ,you are trying to transport the request of DS(which internally depends upon the ES) ,so you are getting warning.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Suppressing Warning and Error Dialogs in 8.2

All
I am looking into whether or not it is possible to suppress warning and error dialogs within a form created by LiveCycle Designer 8.2. I am aware this functionality is easily configurable within ES2 - which is the driver behind why I would like to get it working in some form within 8.2. Essentially, I would like no dialog boxes to appear unless explicitly done so via script.
Any ideas?

Just thought I would reach out one last time on this topic. To be more specific, I am looking for a means by which to "turn off" dialogs within a Designer 8.2 form. I still wish to use Validation patterns and perhaps Validation scripts but I don't want any dialog boxes to appear should any pattern or script be violated.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance!

WARNING MSG

had my iphone with me out by the pool... it was on the side face down exposed to the sun... warning msg came up with a yellow triangle with an ! in the middle and the word temperature above it... seems to be working fine now... but was playing my ipod at the time and it just stopped playing...

If the phone gets too hot, it will shut itself down. See p. 132 of the manual... http://manuals.info.apple.com/enUS/iPhone_UserGuide.pdf

Exit to populate Vendor Batch field in Material tab while creating PO.

Hi Experts,
I need an exit to populate Vendor Batch field in Material tab while creating Purchase Order.
Regards,
Jayapal.
Message was edited by:
        Jayapal

HI ,
Folllowing r the exits for po .
Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
Enhancement
MEVME001                                WE default quantity calc. and over/ underdelivery tolerance
MM06E001                                User exits for EDI inbound and outbound purchasing documents
MM06E003                                Number range and document number
MM06E004                                Control import data screens in purchase order
MM06E005                                Customer fields in purchasing document
MM06E007                                Change document for requisitions upon conversion into PO
MM06E008                                Monitoring of contr. target value in case of release orders
MM06E009                                Relevant texts for "Texts exist" indicator
MM06E010                                Field selection for vendor address
MMAL0001                                ALE source list distribution: Outbound processing
MMAL0002                                ALE source list distribution: Inbound processing
MMAL0003                                ALE purcasing info record distribution: Outbound processing
MMAL0004                                ALE purchasing info record distribution: Inbound processing
MMDA0001                                Default delivery addresses
MMFAB001                                User exit for generation of release order
MRFLB001                                Control Items for Contract Release Order
AMPL0001                                User subscreen for additional data on AMPL
MEQUERY1                                Enhancement to Document Overview ME21N/ME51N
LMEDR001                                Enhancements to print program
LMELA002                                Adopt batch no. from shipping notification when posting a GR
LMELA010                                Inbound shipping notification: Transfer item data from IDOC
LMEQR001                                User exit for source determination
LMEXF001                                Conditions in Purchasing Documents Without Invoice Receipt
LWSUS001                                Customer-Specific Source Determination in Retail
M06B0001                                Role determination for purchase requisition release
M06B0002                                Changes to comm. structure for purchase requisition release
M06B0003                                Number range and document number
MELAB001                                Gen. forecast delivery schedules: Transfer schedule implem.
MEFLD004                                Determine earliest delivery date f. check w. GR (only PO)
MEETA001                                Define schedule line type (backlog, immed. req., preview)
ME590001                                Grouping of requsitions for PO split in ME59
M06E0005                                Role determination for release of purchasing documents
M06E0004                                Changes to communication structure for release purch. doc.
M06B0005                                Changes to comm. structure for overall release of requisn.
M06B0004                                Number range and document number
Regards

Vendor Master Fields to be considered for Centralization in SAP MDM

Hello Experts,
In my present assignment, we have 3 different ECC systems each for three different businesses. Now the objective is to consolidate, Harmonize and centralize the Vendor Master for all these standalone ECC systems in SAP MDM.
So multiple discussions are going on the which Vendor Master fields to be kept as Global fields and which ones as local in Central Vendor Repository in SAP MDM. The debate is whether should we keep "Vendor Account group" as Global field or as Local field in MDM.
The debate is each inidividual business unit has defined different account groups for the same vendor in their respective systems.
The question is : What is the best practice-- Should we keep Vendor account group as main table field and define Vendors with one unique account groups OR we maintain the account group in qualified table each pointing to different business unit.
Your inputs are highly appreciated
BR
PTM

Hi Manoj
The debate is each inidividual business unit has defined different account groups for the same vendor in their respective systems.
The question is : What is the best practice-- Should we keep Vendor account group as main table field and define Vendors with one unique account groups OR we maintain the account group in qualified table each pointing to different business unit.
In my opinion this is going to be very complex solution. Ideally we need to define all the Harmonization rules before syndicating data to different target systems.
Is this possibel that the same vendor record which is existing as vendor of different account groups in different systems have same set of attributes. If yes then enabling the remote key for Account group Lookup field is one option and defining a unique Account group 'AG" (which is mapped to say AG1 from remote system1, AG2 from remote system2 and so on..)..
Managing this via Qualified table will be very complex and not advisabel. As Rajesh also mentioned Account Group in MDM should be considered as Global attribute and all such harmonization rules should be defined in your project. AG1=AG2=AG in above exmaple.
Hope this clarifies.
Thanks-Ravi

Ho do we make msg. CK666 become warning msg when we do costing run?

Dear Experts,
The sys. activate transfer price for preserve use.
When we do costing run for profit center valuation, the following error msg ocurred.
CK666 Material 227BO0001/plant 1030: Transfer price could not be found.
Diagnosis
When switching profit center 0000008000->0000005000 (from the material component to the costing object), a transfer price could not be determined for transfer price variant 0 in respect of material 227BO0001 in plant 1030.
System Response
If you carry out costing for a profit center valuation, material 227BO0001 goes into the cost estimate without a value.
If you create a cost estimate for group valuation, profit from material 227BO0001 is not transferred into the cost component split.
Procedure
Check the settings for transfer price variant 0.
In OKEQ, the variant for TP is blank.
Ho do we make msg. CK666 become warning msg when we do costing run? and let costing result can be release, or there's another way?
Thanks in advance.

There is alternative solution.
Try using TCode SE91.
Enter the class - CK and Enter the message number 666.
Select that line message line.
Go to Utilities, Click on "Where-Used-list" or press "CtrlShiftF3" from keyboard.
Select programs and deselect all others.
Identify your program and double click against that under short description.
There you can change the letter from "E" to "W" as your requirement.
NOTE: take assistance of ABAPer of this, Do enquire about the implication of the same in sandbox before doing anything on any other client.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Where warning msg & error msg are maintained in SPRO

Dear All,
pl give the menu path to know that Where warning msg & error msg are maintained in SPRO.
regards
sap11

Hi,
In case of Purchasing, the path to maintain warning & error messages is:
Material Management->Purchasing->Environment Data->Define Attributes of System Messages
In case of Inventory Management,
Material Management->Inventory Management and Physical Inventory->Define Attributes of System Messages
In case of External Service Management,
Material Management->External Services Management->Define Attributes of System Messages
In case of Logistics Invoice verification,
Material Management->Invoice Verification->Logistics Invoice Verification->Define Attributes of System Messages
In case of Material Master,
Logistics - General->Material Master->Basic Settings->Define Attributes of System Messages
Then, for eash message no., Maintain whether the message is to be shown as warning or error or information message.
Reward if useful.
Thanks & Regards,
Komal

Supress warning msg during RRI

We have a query that jumps to R/3 tcode. when we try to jump, for some document no's the jump goes smooth .. for some other doc's, it throws a warning msg saying that the infosource is not linked to the source system. this happnes with some of the docs only. But the jump does go thru to R/3.
I want to supress the warning msg during the jump. I tried in RSRT, but it doesnt help. the error code i get is RSBBS206. where do i have to exactly supress this warning?
Any pointers or clues would be appreciated.
thanks,
Voodi

Hi Vodi,
In RSBBS, go to the sender query in change mode. There should be a tab in the middle column where you have to give your infosource name..
For. eg If you want to jump from Cost centre report (BW) to Masterdata transaction in R/3, you ust assign this particular infosource in RSBBS settings..
Hope it helps.

Warning msg "Signal is not contiguous"

Hi,
I used NI FGen to generate a sine wave to pump into a circuit (under test) and use NI Hi-speed Digitizer to capture the output of the circuit.
The captured signal goes through a low pass filter. This warning message appear at the filter when it is Run continuously.
'Run Once' does not have problem.
Has this got to do with synchronizing the 2 modules in the PXI system or is it a matter of wrong sample rates.
I have searched Help and it mentioned using TClk to synchronize the 2 modules.
How do you use TClk in Signal Express?
How to solve this warning msg?
Someone please help.....thanks.
Regards,
SeeMist

Hello,
I am glad to hear that you resolved the warning issue. In regard to the other project, are you just interesting in generating the signal once? What is the lay out of the steps in the project for both the FGEN and SCOPE? Is the FGEN set to finite or continous generation mode? How is the SCOPE step setup in the Execution Control tab?
SeeMist wrote:
Currently (another project) I use the NI-FEN step to generate a signal from a .hws file (a 25khz burst signal).
It works fine by itself and the "Scope Soft Front Panel" (SFP) is always good at capturing the generated signal.
(The output of generator is externally connected to the input of the Scope).
However, after I closed the SFP and inserted NI-Scope Acquire step in Signal Express, I was not always successful in capturing the signal generated. Sometimes okay, sometimes not.
The error occurred at the FGen step : "Finite Generation timeout"
Do I have to initialise or there is a problem with my setting? Trigger or synchronization problem?
The setting of the FGen remains the same in both tests.
The NI-Scope: Trigger = Edge ; Sample rate =100MS/s; Record Length =5000
Samantha
National Instruments
Applications Engineer

Warning msg at the time of PR creation

When I am creating the PR a Warning msg is being displayed as:-
"Base unit of measure KG adopted from material master record"
Could anybody suggest me, why this msg is comming.
and if I ignore it and go ahead with pressing enter, Is there any future impact by the same.

Hi There
When you create the PR, if you have not provide the unit of entry, System will read the master data and bring the base unit of measure,, and provide the warning message,, You can acknowledge that message and proceed further it is not an issue,,
For more details ref the below link, it provides the details of diff units and usages,,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/a5/63310c43a211d189410000e829fbbd/content.htm
Thanks
Senthil

Warning msg. when trying to activate MP

guys,
I am trying to activate MP, and i am getting following Waring msg. ! what does it mean ? and how serious it it ?
"The InfoProvider properties for ZCIA_M05 are not the same as the system default
Message no. BRAIN376"
thanks

yes i did assign all the infoobject. i could activate it too, but before i could activate it, i got a warning msg.
still, i ignore those and activate it.
but i wasnt sure i serious it. Also i checked MP's properties and its all the same( like other MPs).
But, i thought let me get some information from Experts about that worning !!!
let me know if you have any idea about it.
Also, When i was trying to Activate MP again, it was asking like " its already active, do u still want to active" and if i say yes, it
gives me an error msg. " MP is not yet Locked"
Do i need to Lock it ????? what is that ??
thanks

Warning Msg - While checking Mulitproviders

Hi Frds,
When i am trying the check the mulitproviders, we are getting warning msg. Below is the warning msg which we getting.
Error messages from point of view of OLAP processor:
Message no. R7I127
Now we have upgrade our patch level from 16 to 21.
Kindly can anyone give me some solution to overcome these warning msg.
Thanks
Yuvi

Has the MultiProvider ever been activated in the past? If you activate it, and it hasn't been activated previously, you'll get this message from time-to-time (another one of those "undocumented features"). After actiavting it, go back into the MultiProvider in edit mode and run a check on it. It shouldn't throw that warning anymore.

Suppressing Warning msg- Vendor NAME2 field

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for