Tax Codes not visible

Hi all,
I have just migrated SAP B1 from 2005B to 2007.
i am having a problem with the tax codes. all the tax codes seems to have migrated. I can see then when I write a query for all the tax codes. but i can only see the 5 basic codes when trying to add the tax codes in the sales order. where have the other tax codes gone? how do i get them to show when i hit tab under the tax codes column?
another thing is, the excisable column is grayed out when an item is being added into the document. i am unable to make it active in the form settings. how do i get it enabled?
any help would be appreciated.
scorp

Hi Gordon,
i am still stuck with this problem. the excisable option was not there in the 2005B version, but is present in 2007B (i was seeing the old one in my previous post in the thread). however the option is greyed out.
how do i make the warehouse excisable? i have many warehouses, is there a way to make all the warehouses excisable in one go? i am talking about 200 warehouses here.
i need help with this.
scorp

Similar Messages

FI-AP Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT

Sub: A/P Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT
Hi Frnds.
I have a typical problem.
Till now we are using a "W6" as a tax code, where Excise-10%, Ed Cess-2%, SEd Cess-1% and VAT-4%.
But as the Govt. rules changed I have created a new tax code "W8" by copying the W6 and modified the VAT to 5% by changing the condition record JVRD.
The new tax code is not calculating VAT part correctly. It is taxing into consideration Invoice Base value, Ed Cess & SEd Cess (Omiting the Excise Duty).
I have checked my Tax Procedure, there everything is fine. Even my old tax code "W6" is working correctly.
Let me know where the error lies.
Here is the scenario
00. Tax code                       -   W6   -   W8   - Current Staus of W8
01. Invoice Base               - 355181 - 351798 - 353324 (by SAP Document Simulation View)
02. Excise @ 10% on 01.        - 35518 - 35180 - 35332
03. Ed Cess @ 2% on 01.        -    710 -    704 -    707
04. SEd Cess @ 1% on 01.       -    355 -    352 -    353
05. VAT @ 4% on (010203+04) - 15671 -   0     - 0
05.    VAT @ 5% on (010203+04) -    0    - 19401 - 0
05.     VAT @ 5% on (010304)     -   0     -    0    - 17719
INVOICE TOTAL VALUE            - 407435 - 407435 - 407435
Pls. let me know how to come over the issue.
By the way I am using the above tax code at FB60 transaction code.
Regards
Krishna
Edited by: Gopi Krishna Gutti on Oct 17, 2011 10:18 AM

Hi Vivek
Acutually we planned to implement SAP - FI & MM Modules only, and all the configuration is done in the system, but at the final stage our management is not satisfied with MM area, so finally we have gone live with only FI Moudle.
By the way thankyou for the reply. I have maintained 100% in JMX1 for the new tax code and it is working fine.
I will give you full points.
Once again thanks a lot.
Regards
Krishna

Validation for tax code not to use

Dear Gurus,
i had done validation for purchase/sales tax code not use while doing transction.
Prerequisite
BKPF-BUKRS =1000
CHECK
NOT BESEG-MESKZ IN ZTAXCODE
Message
you can't use this tax code
i had done this validation for parent company code(1000) but it is giving error for our subsidiary company(3000), though the tax procedure is differnet for both the company taxinj(india) and taxusj(usa). Also the end user is making transction in company code 3000 without tax code still system give him error.
Please advice how to rectify it.
Regards,
Rajesh K

Hi,
As per my understanding the Tax Code is same but the Tax Procedures are different for the two Company Codes. The solution is to add Company Code 3000 also in the validation Prerequisite. With this it could work.
Regards,
Kiron Kumar T.

Tax code not getting picked up from PO during SES

Dear Experts,
I am looking for configuration where the end user need not enter Tax code during SES. I tried a scenario where I did not maintain any service master and also did not enter any line item in service tab at item level, rather I processed my PO using limits.
Now when I prepare SES using this PO, Tax code is not getting picked up from PO and some tax code(I1) appears. Since I don't want end user to input any tax code I've left it blank.
Finally when I am doing MIRO, i am not able select the desired Tax code(say I8) as it is not available for selection. I get only one Tax code(say I1) available for selection. Even other Tax codes are not available for selection.
Please advise, how do I resolve this, why is the Tax code not getting picked up in SES? and why am I not getting other tax codes for selection in MIRO?
Thanks and Regards
Mansih

Hi,
Tax for service maintained in the service PO in the INVOICE TAB in item details. You are not going to maintain the service tax during SES. In SES you are just recognizing / confirming the vendor performed /completed the required service given to him.
During invoice tax code will flow from service PO to Invoice & you need to just select check box u201Ccalculate taxu201D & remove default tax code in MIRO, if any tax code set for default entry in MIRO. If you want your service tax code should appear in the MIRO screen then just activate in t.code:OBZT (relevant for all transaction),then you can select your service tax code during invoice verification WRT service PO.
Regards,
Biju K

Enter an input tax code, not an output tax code in Txn CNMM

Hi All,
We are trying to use PROMAN transaction CNMM from Project systems for converting PR to PO. But when I try to do that I get the following error
"Enter an input tax code, not an output tax code"
So it seems that the system is picking the incorrect sales tax code in PO because of which the PR is not converted to PO then. But when I check in transaction CNMM there is no place to input a tax code anywhere. So the system is probably picking it from somewhere, but I am not able to figure out where is it picking it from.
Does someone have an idea about where the system is picking the tax code?
Regards,
V S

Hi,
Can you do one thing in your testing server....
Create purchase requisition manually for that material and with respect to that requisition try to create PO without putting any tax code, and see whether you are able to create PO, keep the same document types at PR and PO level, (it should be the same when you create PO thru CNMM)
-Saleel

Excise tax combinations not visible

Hi,
I have about 10 excise tax combinations made.
When I enter any Sales or Purchasing document, the tax combinations with BED or CESS etc.
are not visible. Only simple ones as VAT12.5% or CST2% are visible.
Item has already been defined as excisable.
What is the reason behind this?
Regards
Sandeep.

Hi
to get visible excise tax codes, that item and its linked warehouse should be excisable.
Then only you can get excise tax codes in any form.
Check the Item master and warehouse master. Excisable check box is there.
Regards
Kamlesh

Tax code not flowing while ME59N in case of conversion of service PR to PO

Hello,
I am trying to create automatic PO using ME59N for Service PR. But system is showing an error Tax code is not found. In my case I cannot create Contract. I have to maintain Service conditions in ML33 from which the Service amount will flow. Everything else is working fine, except that I cannot bring the tax code. My vendor is ERS vendor. So the tax code is manadatory and I don't want to remove the check.
Please suggest how to bring the tax code automatically? I have tried creating inforecord using the material group of the service. But it has not worked.
Please help. Useful suggestions will be awarded.

I have found a solution in standard itself

Tax code not defined in ERS

Hi,
When i create PO and check the ERS invoice expected check box,I get the error messgae as below:
Enter Tax Code for ERS settlement.
Pls advise.

Hi
First of all check the vendor mater and in that Purchasing data for ERS setelements and after that check the tax procedure. If the tax procdure is not define for the ERS then you need to define in the system.
REgards
sAtsih

Tax code not taking

Hi
when created tax code in FTXP with following details are entered
Tax procedure- taxinj
country key-IN
But the system does not allow to create tax code without entering
Tax Jurisdiction in the initial screen of FTXP transaction.
But indian tax system does not have Tax Jurisdiction system,it is applicable for US.
Pl explain how to create tax code in CIN
regards
Umapathy.M

Hi Umapathy
In our system the country version of India is only half installed but I could see that the tax calculation procedure that you are using TAXINJ is with Jurisdiction levels.
Check the Calculation Procedure: what Cond.category do those condition types in that procedure have, and what kind of access sequence they are using
eg. I have in our system JMO1, JMO2, etc, they are using access sequence "TAXJ", in which "TXJCD" is one of the fields. Therefore, you can't create Tax code without Jurisdiction codes.
If you don't use J-code, you need to modify the tax procedure.
Junqi

Tax codes not displaying in print preview.

hello,
i need to display tax codes in the me23n print preview.for that i write a subroutine pool program and fetch the values. but the values are not displayed. i debuged the subroutine pool program, i found that in output structure itcsy, there are no fields. i hope this is the reason for the values not displayed. please help some one how to display values.
coding : in script,
define &g_menge&
define &g_taxcode&
perform get_main_details in program z_mm_po_details
using &ekpo-ebeln&
using &ekpo-ebelp&
changing &g_menge&
changing &g_taxcode&
endperform
in subroutine pool program,
FORM get_main_details TABLES input STRUCTURE itcsy
output STRUCTURE itcsy.

Hello Kiran,
<li> We can display LOGO using REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY only not using REUSE_ALV_LIST_DISPLAY. So when you click on print preview Grid output is displayed as REUSE_ALV_LIST_DISPLAY output. It is confirmed that using ABAP classical or ALV printing LOGO is not possible.
<li>To print LOGO, you can go for SCRIPTS or SMARTFORMS.
Thanks
Venkat.O

TAX CODE not reflecting in automatic purchase order

Dear MM/SD Gurus,
We are in process of Transportation. Flow of business scenario is mentioned below.
Sales order-> Delivery->Shipment->Shipment cost.
After creation of shipment cost document, as configuration system is generating automatic purchase order for
freight vendor and also post service entry sheet.
But in purchase order genereted in back ground , there is no tax code in invoice tab though we had maintained
master info record for Vendor,Material group,Plant,Purchasing org level.
PO is genereted in D (Item Category) and K (Account assignment category) withouth any master data.
So we maintained Info record on base of material group.
Thanks & Regards
Rajan

Hi
check your Po and see info record number is there or not and check your tax code in that info record again
Regards
kailas Ugale

Tax Code not copied from Billing to Accounting

Hi,
I have a case wherein the tax code is not being copied over from an intercompany Invoice to Accounting line items.
The conditon record at Billing Header (MWST) has a tax code of B4. The Tax code at the Accouting Line Items is coming out as Blank. The VAT number however is correctly defined.
What we did notice is that this would occur when the MWST is determined as 0%. For non-zero data, the tax code gets copied over.
Does anyone have any idea why its happening this way.
Thanks n Regards
Dharmendra Rara

Hi Dharmendra,
Please note that the SD-FI interface changed
from earlier releases. The note 400766 eplxains the checks made.
So it is possible that now you get error message FF805, when in an
earlier release you didn't get it, eventhough no customizing change.
However please note =>
In the vast majority of cases, error FF805 occurs because of an error
in your pricing procedure. The previously attached note 112609 explains
in detail how tax codes are transfered to conditions.
The note 400766 explains the checks performed by the system on the Tax
codes:
1. system checks whether there is a revenue line for each tax line.
2. in the reverse case, for each revenue line containing a certain
tax indicator there must be a tax line with this indicator.
If the tax condition has condition value zero and condition base
value zero, then it is not transferred to FI.
If you have revenue lines containing a tax indicator XX, but no
tax line with tax indicator XX, then the error FF805 issues, and
it is justified. => Please check these informations.
I hope this is helpful.
Regards,
Alex

Tax code not displaying in me2j - Need Report for PO tax codes

Dear Guru's,
For Trading materials, while creating PO, we are inserting Tax codes in "Invoicing Tab". But the same(TAX CODE) is not displaying in ME2J report.
But For service materials, we are entering tax codes in the "Services Tab" and it is displaying in the report ME2J.
Kindly tell me a report where we can see the taxcodes for PO.
Regards,
deepa

Sir,
I did that already, but no code is displaying in that "Tax code Column" for Trading materials.
But tax code has been entered while creating PO in "Invoicing Tab" as "V0" for example.. V0 is not displaying in ME2J Report.
Pls. reply
Edited by: deepa rani on Jun 4, 2008 2:54 PM

Tax code not working in PO

Hi Experts,
When i use a Tax code A1 in PO and clcik on Taxes it will not give me the respsective tax calculation.
we have maintained the condition records for this. still it is not calcualting taxes
can any one guide me how to deal with this
regards
subbu

Have you maintained the tax rate percentages by tax code and tax jurisdiction in FTXP - Maintain Tax Code?
Regards

Tax code not appearing in Header data of MIRO

Dear All,
I have one query and it is as follows.
I created one Input tax code A3 in transaction FTXP.
When I went to transaction MIRO this tax code A3 is not appearing in header data of MIRO.
Can you pls tell is there any other settings to be done to fullfill the above requirment.
Thanks in advance
Babu

Hi
Create a tax code in FTXP
Then assigen tax code to company code
Maintain condition records FV11
Try it out
Regards,
Raman

Tax Codes not visible

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for