Testing success/failure of archiveLogFile() method of servermanager

When attempting to archive a log file programmatically using the archiveLogFile() method of servermanager is there a way to test the success/failure of the action. I tried
adminObj = createObject("component","cfide.adminapi.administrator").login("topsecret");
serverObj = createObject("component","cfide.adminapi._servermanager.servermanager");
result = serverObj.archiveLogFile("logfilename");
writeDump(result);
However, result is undefined.
Thanks!

That function has a void returntype, that's why.
http://www.cfexecute.com/admin-api-documentation/servermanager-cfc/#method_archiveLogFile
Instead you'd have to do something like a directory read to see if the file had been renamed.

Similar Messages

Is it possible to hide success/failure captions in the test, but make them available in the review?

Hi Everyone
I've got a 50 question, timed quiz and we want to disable the success and failure captions because they slow the students down, frankly, are kind of annoying. However, we want to allow the users to review the quiz after taking it. The problem is that the review feed back seems to use the success/failure object, so, when you review the quiz, you just see the questions with no feedback. Kind of pointless. Does anyone know of a way to disable (or remove) the success/failure captions in the quiz, while providing feedback in the quiz review?
Thanks

Hello,
For the moment a lot of people are still working with CP4, others have adopted CP5 already, so it helps if you mention the version you're using.
The feedback showed during review is in the Review area (you can see it in the slide on the stage). The message in this Review Area is not linked to the Correct/Incorrect/Incomplete messages you can show during answering the Questions. If you are using CP5 you can deactivate the Correct and Incomplete messages in the Quiz Properties panel, region Options. You cannot deactivate the Incorrect message. If the user answers correctly and the Correct caption is not there, the project will continue after clicking on the Submit button. However when the user answers incorrectly, the Incorrect message will appear however, instructing them to use 'Y' or click on the slide to continue.
During Review the user will see the Review Message, if you allowed Review (Quiz Preferences, Settings). The message showed is configured in the "Quiz Review Message' that you'll see in the Properties panel when the Review area is selected (or using the button 'Quiz Review Messages...' in the Quiz Preferences, Settings). If the user answered correctly, the message 'You answered this question correctly" (is indeed similar to the Correct caption). If the user answered incorrectly, his answer will be displayed and the correct answer (which is different from the Incorrect caption).
Hope this explains the difference. If you are using CP4, let me know and I'll try to explain the workflow in that UI.
Lilybiri

Strange issue in custom Success/Failure captions

Hi,
I have a strange issue in my custom Success/Failure caption. If I use 'S' letter in my customized caption .bmp file, it is not showing properly in the captivate. Attached file is for your reference. I tried converting text into image in photoshop, still it shows the same thing. Any thoughts??
Thanks in Advance,
-Ajay

OK. That's what I thought.
So what I think is going on here is due to the way Captivate assembles text captions that can stretch to any size based on the component images. I think your corner image that contains the text is being stretched right at the point where the S character is located on the end of Congratulations. Captivate is achieving the resizable text caption by repeating the last few pixels of each background image.
If you want to test my theory, just make your Congratulations text slightly shorter (use a condensed font or make the font size smaller) and I think your issue will go away.

Mapping tested successfully in Simulator but fails in SXI_MONITOR

Hi gyus,
The Outbound message structure is the following:
MT_CAP_BANKS
actions     1..1    xsd:string
RECORD   0..unbounded Segment
   Field1
   Field2
   etc
The target Inbound message structure is the structure of the JDBC receicer adapter, since the scenario is Proxy to JDBC.
MT_DB_BANKS
STATEMENT       1..unbounded
DBSTATEMENT   1..1
   action
   etc
I want to have one STATEMENT per RECORD segment. But the RECORD segment may also be missing in case that we want to do massive delete of all the entris in a table. So I may have only the action field in some test cases.
Therefore, I am mapping RECORD>mapWithDefault>STATEMENT.
Mapping is tested successfully in simulator for all cases, either many RECORD segment or no RECORD segment. Interface mapping tested successfully. However, when we are doing real tests, mapping works fine with many RECORD segments, but fails with no RECORD segments (Cannot produce target element /ns0:MT_DB_BANKS/STATEMENT. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd).
Any ideas ?
I also tried to chang the mapping with IF RECORD EXISTS THEN STATEMENT='' ELSE RECORD-->STATEMENT but problem still remains!!

Hi,
I'm not really sure why you are encountering this error. Have you tried any context modifications before mapping to field STATEMENT?
Could you try this mapping?
constant:null -----------------------------------------> \
RECORD --> mapWithDefault:null --> equalsS:null --> ifThenElse --> STATEMENT
constant:hasValue -------------------------------------> /
The code should perform just like the one with the mapWithDefault without the ifThenElse, but it's worth to try.
Hope this helps,

Suggestion: Click Box needs option to display success/failure caption until next click

As it stands right now, if I want to put several click boxes on a page and have the success captions for each appear in the same location, I can only set the success/failure caption to display for a limited amount of time. That is the only way to make the text disappear from the screen. The problem is, I want to have several different click boxes. When the user clicks, the success caption should display. Then the user shoudl be able to click on another click box and have the success caption for that appear in the same location. The problem is the success caption from the previous click box may still be displayed (depending on how long it was set to display for). There really needs to be an option to select that says display until next click. It does no good to guess how long a user will want to read the success/failure text before they decide to click on another text box.
You have the same problem with audio. As it is right now, a user can click on several click boxes and have several different audio tracks playing simultaneously. There needs to be an option to disable the first audio track upon clicking the next click box.
I can't believe this problem hasn't been fixed before this. It is a very annoying problem. I never had half the problems I have with Captivate, when I used Authorware. If there is some kind of work-around I'd like to know what it is.

My suggestion would be that you think a little further outside the box to solve this 'issue'.
It appears to me that you want to display information in captions that appear and disappear based on user interaction, correct? AND you also want audio to play at the same time, but you don't want more than one audio track to play, correct?
To achieve what you want requires at least two separate mouse events. One event triggers the caption and audio to appear. The other must trigger any previous captions to disappear and immediately shut off their audio. Since you don't know which of your objects will be the first one interacted with by the user, all of them must be set up to check for any previously invoked captions and audio before turning on their own caption and audio.
Now all of this CAN be done using Captivate's variables and advanced actions. But there IS a much simpler solution staring you in the face. Why is it essential that all of this MUST happen with mouse clicks? Why not use mouse overs events instead?
Captivate provides rollover caption and rollover image objects for which you can attach audio to the object that appears on rollover. These objects have two mouse events (rollover and rollout). Rollover triggers the caption to appear so that the text displays and it's audio plays, while the rollout triggers the caption to disappear and automatically shut off the audio. This means that the user merely needs to move their mouse around the screen rolling over the hot spots to see information and hear audio. And if you just place a click box or button on the slide to pause the playhead, your user can spend as much time as they want reviewing the content before moving on. You don't have to worry about rewinding the playhead with Advanced Actions because clicks on your content objects would resume play.
These rollover objects can be set up in seconds with audio attached. I'm surprised more Captivate authors don't use them given how easy they are to apply in comparison to other click-driven solutions using Advanced Actions.

[svn:bz-trunk] 21014: bug fix for RTMP security test case failure for Tomcat 7,

Revision: 21014
Revision: 21014
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2011-04-04 13:44:59 -0700 (Mon, 04 Apr 2011)
Log Message:
bug fix for RTMP security test case failure for Tomcat 7,
defer the ValveBase.getContainer() call to run time.
Checkin tests not run as it only applies to Tomcat 7
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/modules/opt/src/tomcat/flex/messaging/security/Tomcat7Valve.java

Revision: 21014
Revision: 21014
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2011-04-04 13:44:59 -0700 (Mon, 04 Apr 2011)
Log Message:
bug fix for RTMP security test case failure for Tomcat 7,
defer the ValveBase.getContainer() call to run time.
Checkin tests not run as it only applies to Tomcat 7
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/modules/opt/src/tomcat/flex/messaging/security/Tomcat7Valve.java

Portal configuration: when CIM test getting failure

Hi everybody,
here i got problem while importing files cr_content .zip .
iam getting failure.
And also in performing CIM TEST in visual j2ee admintool.
the test is failure.
Intial time my sytem works properly after few days i got error like this .
how to solve these problem.
give guidence, otherwise refer manuals .
with
jagadeesh

Hi Jagadeesh,
At the first step, check whether that you can logon to the SLD by using the user that you are using for CIM connection on J2EE visual admin.
At the second step, be sure that you are importing correct version of "CR Content".
Best regards,
Orkun Gedik

0 of 3 tests successful

I try to install WebLogicFusionOrderDemo. However, I cannot connect to BAM-sta00751
In 192.168.1.4, there are 2 weblogic running. I just want to install this sample to one of the two.
Testing HTTP connection     ... failed.
Remote host closed connection during handshake
Testing Data Object browsing     ... failed.
Remote host closed connection during handshake
Testing JNDI connection     ... failed.
Failed to establish a connection to "192.168.1.4" at port 9001;
Please verify BAM Server Host & JNDI Port.
0 of 3 tests successful.

HI
You will need to change the connection information to your BAM install in JDEV before deploying.
Also,set the BAM adapter connection information to point to the BAM server on your SOA server.

Library/test/success

Every 10 minutes or so, my mac has a window pop up that says Join "Home" at the top and SUCCESS in it, and at the bottom of the window is: http://www.apple.com/library/test/success. It does also seem to be searching for the wifi connection. Any advice?

Most likely, it means that you're trying to connect to a wireless network with a misconfigured or incompatible captive portal. Remove it from the list of preferred networks. In some cases, a cordless phone network might be mistaken for a Wi-Fi network.

[svn] 1074: Fix test case to implement new method in IXMLEncoder

Revision: 1074
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-04-02 13:00:45 -0700 (Wed, 02 Apr 2008)
Log Message:
Fix test case to implement new method in IXMLEncoder
Modified Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/flexunit/src/tests/flexunit/wscl/dec oder/SOAPEncoderTestCase.as

Year           Is Leab Year?
1           no
4            yes
1580            yes
1582           no
1584            yes
1600            yes
1700            no
1800            no
1900            no
1996            yes
1997           no
1999            no
2000            yes
2100            no
2200            no
2300            no
2400            yes
2800            yes
2900            no
3200            yes
3300            no
3600            yes
3800            no
4000            yes
4200            no
4400            yes
4700            no
4800            yes
5100            no
5200            yes
6400            yes
6500            no
6800            yes
6900            no
7200            yes
7400            no
7600            yes
7800            no

How to check the success/failure of e-mail sending from Sharepoint?

Dear Expert,
I connect Exchange 2010 and SharePoint 2010. When user create workflow in sharepoint, it will send the email to confirm. if it's done. but I checked from user they didn't get the email. I would like to know how to check the success/failure of e-mail
sending from Sharepoint?
Thank you

By default, there is no logging mechanism in SharePoint for outgoing mails.
Mails in SharePoint are sent by giving an SMTP sever IP address in Central Administration. SharePoint never sends email directly. It relays or routes mails to the SMTP server. So, logging should be done in the SMTP server itself.
There is also another way of doing it. You can enable SMTP service of IIS for sending emails from SharePoint, which would also just relay the mails to an SMTP Server. But in this case, you can enable logging in your IIS SMTP Service. Please visit this blog
for more details.
In your case you need to check your exchange server for any failure for relaying mails.
Regards, Vikas Patel

SAP ECC 6 Upgrade to 2008 R2 and Virtualization success/failure stories

Hi Sap community,
I'm planning the following upgrade on my SAP Ecc 6.0 :
Source CI : physical server on windows 2003 x64 SP2,
Target CI : virtual server under vsphere 5.0 Windows 2008 x64 R2,
Source DB : physical server on windows 2003 x64 SP2, SQL 2005 SP2
Target DB : virtual server on windows 2008 x64 R2, SQL 2008 R2
Target physical boxes are not the same as source..
I've already verified pre-requisites, best practices, upgrade path on notes, forums,etc ..
What I haven't found, are the different experiences (success or failure stories) people had with performances while performing such an upgrade, especially with the path I want to use :
1) P2V the 2 servers
2) Upgrade to W2008 R2
3) Upgrade SQL to SQL 2008 R2
Although technically it works (tested on sandbox) I'm just wondering in a long term and with load, if such a enviroment will run without issues in production.
I know that some of you will advice me to create new clean installs and use "system copy" but I would like to avoid changing my hostnames because of dependencies (with BI, CRM, transport system etc...) UNLESS someone tells me that he experienced the P2V method and lived a nightmare.
My second question would be : for the DB : has someone tested having DB on VMDK disks versus RDM disks.
Thank you
Jorge

Hi,
What I haven't found, are the different experiences (success or failure stories) people had with performances while performing such an upgrade, especially with the path I want to use :
1) P2V the 2 servers
2) Upgrade to W2008 R2
3) Upgrade SQL to SQL 2008 R2
Answer to your above 3 questions : approach has been successful. I had done it at 2 places.
My second question would be : for the DB : has someone tested having DB on VMDK disks versus RDM disks.
Please find more details about VMDK and RDM in the links below. Further more you can have maximum details about your query from the link below.
VMware documents regarding SAP products
Hope this answers all your queries.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

BootCamp 2.1 Success/Failure

Hello everyone.
There are now several threads on this topic. I have read over most of them and i think i may have found a link between the failures. However, proving this will require your help. Although the update just released is 2.1, most people will have used v2.0 drivers up until now (included on Leopard DVD). However, it appears that there was a sneaky update to BootCamp that is only available on certain Restore Discs that come with new Macs. The version contained on them is 2.02.
I would like people to list their experience with installing v2.1.
Answer these questions please.
1. Your Mac model (be specific with release dates/model numbers)?
2. Did you install drivers from a Leopard DVD, or from your Restore Discs?
3. Did your 2.1 install succeed, or fail?
4. XP, Vista32 or Vista64?
5. Windows on partition within OS X hard drive, or separate drive?
Keeping your answers short will allow easier collation of people's responses. Thanks.
My details are as follows...
1. MacPro 3.0Ghz 8-core (April 2007)
2. BootCamp drivers installed from Leopard DVD
3. BootCamp 2.1 succeeded on XP, installer fails to launch on Vista64
4. See 3, above
5. XP on separate drive, Vista64 on separate drive

Hello again,
I have done some more digging around the internet and tried a few more tricks. My specific interest is Vista64.
It seems to be a fact that, prior to Boot Camp 2.02, there are no 64 bit drivers for Vista. Boot Camp 2.02 appears to be available only on the Restore Discs that came with Mac Pro 2008 model. This means that, for example, my Vista64 installation (which has Boot Camp 2.0 drivers installed from the Leopard DVD) has only 32 bit drivers installed. I have confirmed this by seeking out the location of the installed drivers. They are in a folder called 'Boot Camp' within 'Program Files(x86)'. The 'Program Files' folder (this is the 64 bit folder) has no 'Boot Camp' folder in it at all.
To test out a theory, i downloaded the BC 2.1 update for Vista32. However, before installing this, i used the Leopard DVD BC 2.0 installer to remove the existing installation. I did this to see if the BC 2.1 Vista32 Update would install if there were no existing drivers at all. The update simply refused to even launch. I then re-installed BC 2.0 from the Leopard DVD and tried the BC 2.1 Vista32 updater. This time, the updater launched and went through the installation process. However, it gave the same errors (KeyAgent and Mac HAL) that v2.0 installer does.
Regardless, this appears to confirm that the BC 2.1 updaters (XP, Vista32 and Vista64) require a suitable set of existing Boot Camp drivers to be installed. I think it is also safe to say that the BC 2.1 Vista64 updater will only run if you have existing 64 bit drivers installed (i.e. you installed from Mac Pro 2008 Restore Discs, not the Leopard DVD or earlier)
I must add that the semi-successful installation of BC 2.1 Vista32 drivers has not given me the features found in XP (Eject Key, Volume Keys etc etc).
I would be very keen to get hold of a copy of the Boot Camp Drivers that are on the Mac Pro 2008 Restore Discs as i have read that the 'KeyAgent' and 'Mac HAL' errors are not present during installation. I am quite sure that with these drivers installed on my own Mac Pro, the BC 2.1 Vista64 updater will work.
Can anyone who has a Mac Pro 2008 extract the Boot Camp installer from their disc and send it to me somehow? Any suggestions on how this could be achieved? Upload to .Mac, Torrent etc.

Exchange 2010 SP3 - Test-OutlookConnectivity Failures

Test-OutlookConnectivity -Protocol TCP gives success on all tests. If I run Test-OutlookConnectivity -Protocol HTTP, I get failures on all . I'm trying to figure out why. We have a single CAS array in our main site with two servers.
We have a third server in our COLO location and there is no CAS for that site. Outlook Anywhere is not enabled.
If I run "Test-OutlookConnectivity -Protocol HTTP" at the main site, I get this error message:
Fatal Autodiscover failure EXPR = <Null>.
    + CategoryInfo          : OperationStopped: (Microsoft.Excha...onnectivityTask:TestOutlookConnectivityTask) [Test-
   OutlookConnectivity], FatalAutodiscoverException
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : F70A1ED2,Microsoft.Exchange.Monitoring.TestOutlookConnectivityTask
    + PSComputerName        : ex1.domain.local
I get different messages altogether when I run tests from the COLO site. For both protocols I get the message:
An error occurred while trying to access mailbox EX2.domain.local, on behalf of user o2bancorp.local\extest_49ce0203
32a04
Additional information:
[Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Storage.WrongServerException]: The user and the mailbox are in different Active Directory sit
es..
    + CategoryInfo          : OperationStopped: (Microsoft.Excha...onnectivityTask:TestOutlookConnectivityTask) [Test-
   OutlookConnectivity], CasHealthStorageErrorException
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : 6A829B37,Microsoft.Exchange.Monitoring.TestOutlookConnectivityTask
It seems to me that we don't have something setup properly in our environment. I think the reason that the lead Exchange admin does not have a CAS array defined for the COLO site is that some of our business locations that are part of the COLO site
and he doesn't want the Exchange server there servicing client requests except for in a DR scenario. He also has also had all receive connectors disabled. I enabled the two default receive connectors on the COLO Exchange server.

Hi Hollisorama,
Base on my knowledge, this command is used to test end-to-end Outlook connectivity scenario for Outlook Anywhere, however outlook anywhere is disabled in your environment. It is the reason why you will get error message when running the command.
I recommend you refer to the following article to enable outlook anywhere, and then test connectivity again:
Enable Outlook Anywhere
Best regard,
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

Test-outlookconnectivity failure

Hi,
One of the CAS server i get error below after run the commad "Test-OutlookConnectivity -Protocol tcp"
      RFRI::GetReferral.                  Failure   -1.00
ErrorRecord: Task failed on timeout. Overtime = 00:07:49.4185783.
    + CategoryInfo          : OperationTimeout: (Microsoft.Excha...onnectivityTask:TestOutlookConnectivityTask) [Test-
   OutlookConnectivity], TaskException
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : C918CCB1,Microsoft.Exchange.Monitoring.TestOutlookConnectivityTask
The casarray is defined on Hardware load balancer, versiyon is Exchange 2010 SP2 RU 4 v.2
how can i fix this problem?
Thank you in advance...

on cas02,
ClientAccessServer   ServiceEndpoint                               Scenario
Result Latency
(MS)
CAS02.cam.... email.cam.com                             Autodiscover: Web service request. Success
46.80
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.539 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.539 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.555 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.555 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.555 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : Using connection parameters :
'cam.intra\extest_1eb30811639a4: Rfri/TCP-IP, [cas.cam.intra/Negotiate]'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.555 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : Address Book Operation = 'GetNewDSA', Input = 'userLegacyDN',
Input Value = '/o=CAM/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=extest_1eb30811639a4'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.555 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : GetNewDSA Response - Result: 'cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.555 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : Address Book Operation = 'GetFQDNFromLegacyDN', Input =
'serverLegacyDN', Input Value = '/o=CAM/ou=Exchange Administrative Group
(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.555 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : GetFQDNFromLegacyDN Response - Result: 'cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.555 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
CAS02.cam.... cas.cam.intra                          RFRI::GetReferral.
Success   15.60
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.555 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.555 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : Using connection parameters :
'cam.intra\extest_1eb30811639a4: Nspi/TCP-IP, [cas.cam.intra/Negotiate]'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.555 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : Address Book Operation = 'Bind'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.571 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : Address Book Operation = 'GetHierarchyInfo'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.571 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : Address Book Operation = 'QueryHomeMDB', Input =
'primarySmtpAddress', Input Value = '[email protected]'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.586 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : /o=CAM/ou=Exchange Administrative Group
(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=cas.cam.intra/cn=Microsoft Private MDB
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.586 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : /o=CAM/ou=Exchange Administrative Group
(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=extest_1eb30811639a4
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.586 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : Address Book Operation = 'GetNetworkAddresses', Input =
'serverLegacyDN', Input Value = '/o=CAM/ou=Exchange Administrative Group
(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.586 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : ncacn_ip_tcp:cas.cam.intra
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.586 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
CAS02.cam.... cas.cam.intra                          NSPI::GetProfileDetails.
Success   31.20
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.602 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.602 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.602 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : Using connection parameters :
'cam.intra\extest_1eb30811639a4: Mailbox/TCP-IP, [cas.cam.intra/Negotiate]'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.602 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : Mailbox Operation: 'EcDoConnectEx', Target mailbox:
'/o=CAM/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=extest_1eb30811639a4'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.602 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.602 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.602 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : EcDoConnectEx Result: '0'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.602 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
CAS02.cam.... cas.cam.intra                          Mailbox::Connect.
Success    0.00
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.602 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.617 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : EcDoRpcExt2 Response - Result: '0'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.617 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : EcDoRpcExt2 Response - Error code: '0'
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.617 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : RPC Endpoint = 'cas.cam.intra'
CAS02.cam.... cas.cam.intra                          Mailbox::Logon.
Success   15.60
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.617 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : Admin Audit Log: Entered Handler:OnComplete.
VERBOSE: [21:32:49.617 GMT] Test-OutlookConnectivity : Ending processing &
And there is nothing on event log related with this issue....
actually, we get error from SCOM like this,
Alert: TCP Connectivity with Autodiscover - Address Book failure (ABREF) Resolution state....
Verbose: Using connection parameters : 'cam.intra\extest_1eb30811639a4: Rfri/TCP-IP, [cas.cam.intra/Negotiate]'
Verbose: Address Book Operation = 'GetNewDSA', Input = 'userLegacyDN', Input Value = '/o=CAM/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=extest_1eb30811639a4'
Verbose: Microsoft.Exchange.Rpc.RpcException: Error 0x5b4 (This operation returned because the timeout period expired) from cli_RfrGetNewDSA RPC EEInfo is not enabled or there is no error on this thread.
   at ThrowRpcException(Int32 rpcStatus, String message)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Rpc.RpcClientBase.ThrowRpcExceptionWithEEInfo(Int32 rpcStatus, String routineName)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Rpc.Rfri.RfriRpcClient.GetNewDSA(String userDN, String& server)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Monitoring.RfriClientWrapper.<>c__DisplayClass7.<GetNewDSA>b__6()
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Monitoring.OutlookConnectivityContext.RpcExceptionWrapper(Func`1 protectedCall)
Verbose: AddressBook operation failed. Operation = 'GetReferral', Error = 'The Address Book Referral operation failed. Operation = '<GetNewDSA>b__6', returnValue = '1460', server = 'CAS01.cam.intra', user = '/o=CAM/ou=Exchange Administrative Group
(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=extest_1eb30811639a4', .'

Testing success/failure of archiveLogFile() method of servermanager

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for