The Good Proportion?

Hi guys,
I know the Golden Section can help you out in getting nice website layout proportion. I got a bit confused if the current standard is
1024 px
why those online grid calculator start measure are:
830 px
http://www.grafikk.co.uk/gridmaker/#/12,60,500,10,16761021,true,10,10,16732743/
or
910 px
http://netprotozo.com/grid/
for the Page Width?
Thanks for any info!
Cheers,
Sebs

Since you cannot control the HEIGHT of your page, the Golden Ratio goes out the window, and you have to consider more practical and pragmatic dimensions.  Consider your target demographic and imagine what their MINIMUM screen resolution will be.  Most likely that's 1024 wide.  In that case, you would try to accommodate at least a 1024 wide (i.e., maximized) browser window for your pages, without a horizontal scrollbar.  To do that, you need to consider the contribution that browser 'chrome' makes to the viewport width.  At a 1024 minimum, you have about 980px of available width.  Thus, making your pages 960-980px wide will guarantee you no horizontal scrollbars on those screens.  At least that's how I figure it.

Similar Messages

  • Value of the good movements is in negative

    I'm trying to do a reversal for the returns with the movement type 162, but i'm not able to post the reversal and i'm getting the error that the Value of the goods movement is in negative

    1. Case A:
                  There are two goods receipts with different values. This situation occurs when the order price between the two goods receipts was changed. The system valuates the return delivery or the reversal with the average value of goods received.
                  Example: 100 pieces of a material are ordered at 10 DEM per piece.
    1. Goods receipt:  10 pieces at 100 DEM
    Price change in the purchase order: Order price now 12 DEM per piece.
    2. Goods receipt:  10 pieces at 120 DEM, so that a total of 20 pieces was posted with DEM 220.
    Return delivery (or reversal) of 10 pieces is now valuated with the proportional value of goods received of 10 pieces * 220 / 20 pieces = 110 DEM.
    4. Case D:
                  An order price unit (OPUn) (different to the order unit (OUn)) was defined in the purchase order. The relationship between quantity in OUn and quantity in OPUn is different in the (sum of all) goods receipts to that in the (sum of all) invoices.
                  Example:         100 pieces of a material are ordered at 1 DEM per kg.
                      1 piece (OUn) correspond to 10 kg (OPUn)
    Invoice:         100 pieces with 1000 kg at 1000 DEM
    Goods receipt:    90 pieces with 950 kg at 950 DEM
    Goods receipt:    10 pieces with 100 kg at 100 DEM
    Return delivery:  10 pieces with 105 kg at 105 DEM
                  The difference of 5 DEM in the valuation of the return delivery (or reversal) is a result of the system determining the returned quantity in OPUn - as long as the user has not entered anything different - with the portion of the returned quantity in OUn (10 pieces from 100 pieces, since in OPUn 105 kg from 1050 kg), and valuating with the proportional value delivered to date.

  • COGS (Cost of the Goods Sold) in OPM reg.

    Hi
    Can anyone provide the details about COGS (Cost of the goods sold) documents/set up in R12.
    This is very urgent.
    Kindly do the needful.
    Mail id : [email protected]
    Regards
    Raj

    Hi,
    1. Cost of manufacture of a Product is what the value of goods sold or Cost of Goods sold (COGS). Either, you use the SAP Costing module (CO-PC) to let SAP determine COGS or you can manullay input COGS into material master fields (Standard or Moving Average) in Accounting view of Material master. In either case, COGS is stored in the material master valuation (Accounting) view.
    2. You mean in a COGS? Whatever costs it takes to manufacture a product is included in COGS, for instance Material cost, Labor cost etc.,
    Hope this helps.
    PS: There is lot of documentation available online SAP help protals and please refrain from using this forum for asking such basic questions and restrict to only questions of clarificatory in nature or issue based questions.
    Make an effort to read the SAP help documentation for all your basic questions.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/80/ea89395eb58c4f9d0c3e837cf0909d/frameset.htm
    Mods (Moderators) will lock your threads, if you continue to ask such basic questions, so no one can reply to it.
    Edited by: Pradeep kumar Athmakur on Feb 27, 2010 12:41 AM

  • Classical Report for linking/applying the goods receipts transaction

    Classical Report for linking/applying the goods receipts transaction quantities against oldest schedule line item dates and then downloading the file to Excel.
    o        Classical Interactive Reports for calculating average Day Payable Outstanding. Option 1) in summary by company code, vendor, currency. (w/ DPO calc) Option 2) in detail (w/o DPO calc) Option 3) special summary by vendor and roughly convert different currency into one currency of choice, using current YEARLY rate.
    thow to do these objects
    plz assist me
    and how to transfer the data from from one server to other like 3.1 to 5.0
    plz assist me
    Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Feb 21, 2008 5:28 PM

    Hi,
    You can use Call Transcation tcode
    for calling the transaction u can pass values to the transaction by using SET PARAMETER ID and GET PARAMETER ID
    technique.
    For downloading use function module LIST_DOWNLOAD
    or GUI_DOWNLOAD.

  • HT4009 Not very user friendly! Where is the place to report a problem!? I have been billed for an in-app purchase but not had the goods - I received an error message telling my I hadn't been charged at the time and now it is on my bill! What can I do?

    Not very user friendly! Where is the place to report a problem!? I have been billed for an in-app purchase but not had the goods - I received an error message telling my I hadn't been charged at the time and now it is on my bill! What can I do?

    You can try contact iTunes support via this page : http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/ - click on Contact iTunes Store Support on the right-hand side of the page, then Purchases, Billing & Redemption

  • Error while posting the Goods Receipt

    Hi Friends,
    I am having an issue while posting the Goods Receipt.
    I am getting the error "Balance not zero: 1.000,00- debit: 0,00 credit: 1.000,00". I am using the Purchase Order with Account Assignment category P and K. When ever I used the account assignment category, I am getting this type of error. I have checked the configuration and every thing is OK. System is not able to debit the G/L account which is mentioned in the Purchase Order, hence the problem. However, I think system is able to get the G/L account (to Credit the amount) from Automatic Account determination.
    Would like to know if any one come across similar type of problem and resolved it.
    We have recently upgraded the system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0.
    Apprciate the help.
    Thank you,
    Prakash

    Hi
    Thank you for the reply.
    I have checked what you have mentioned. While creating PO it is determining the G/L account automatically through the assignments in OBYC. Even then I am getting the error while doing the Goods Receipt.
    Any one is having any idea?
    Thank you,
    Prakash
    Edited by: Prakash KM on Dec 17, 2010 6:26 PM

  • Changing the G/L Account while Posting the Goods Receipts in MIGO

    Hi All,
    I have requirement in which G/L Account needs to be changed based on some validation while Posting the Goods Receipt in MIGO.
    I have created exit in OBBH by copying the standard SAP Program RGGBS800 in view V_T80D.
    I changed following entry in view V_T80D:
    GBLS     ZGGBS800     Val/sub:Exits for substitution
    Now Inside program ZGGBS800, I have written the logic to change the BSEG-HKONT value with the new G/L Account which gets called inside the standard function module G_VSR_SUBSTITUTION_CALL.
    FORM U999.
       DATA : V_HKONT TYPE BSEG-HKONT.
       clear : V_HKONT.
       SELECT SINGLE SAKNR FROM ZMASH1 INTO V_HKONT WHERE MATNR = BSEG-MATNR AND WERKS = BSEG-WERKS.
         IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
           BSEG-HKONT = V_HKONT.
         ENDIF.
    ENDFORM.
    After the execution of the above code the value of BSEG-HKONT changes with new value of V_HKONT but after this when I go further in Standard SAP code of function module G_VSR_SUBSTITUTION_CALL, there is one subroutine FORM EXP_TAB_009_BSEG  being called which changes the value of BSEG-HKONT to initial value of HKONT also while moving the data from BSEG to TEMP_STRUCT it doesn't passes the HKONT value, which I want it be passed as I want the changed value to be passed finally to OUT_RESULT. Please look at the code below.
    Following is the SAP standard code of subroutione FORM EXP_TAB_009_BSEG :
    FORM EXP_TAB_009_BSEG
             USING
               IN_ORIG STRUCTURE        BSEG
            CHANGING
               OUT_RESULT STRUCTURE     BSEG
               B_RESULT.
      DATA:  ORIG LIKE BSEG.
      DATA:  BEGIN OF TEMP_STRUCT,
             ABPER                          LIKE   BSEG-ABPER,
             AUGGJ                          LIKE   BSEG-AUGGJ,
             DOCLN                          LIKE   BSEG-DOCLN,
             FIPOS                          LIKE   BSEG-FIPOS,
             FISTL                          LIKE   BSEG-FISTL,
             FKBER                          LIKE   BSEG-FKBER,
             FKBER_LONG                     LIKE   BSEG-FKBER_LONG,
             GEBER                          LIKE   BSEG-GEBER,
             GMVKZ                          LIKE   BSEG-GMVKZ,
             GRANT_NBR                      LIKE   BSEG-GRANT_NBR,
             HKTID                          LIKE   BSEG-HKTID,
             HZUON                          LIKE   BSEG-HZUON,
             INTRENO                        LIKE   BSEG-INTRENO,
             MEASURE                        LIKE   BSEG-MEASURE,
             PARGB                          LIKE   BSEG-PARGB,
             PPA_EX_IND                     LIKE   BSEG-PPA_EX_IND,
             PPRCT                          LIKE   BSEG-PPRCT,
             PRCTR                          LIKE   BSEG-PRCTR,
             PRODPER                        LIKE   BSEG-PRODPER,
             PRZNR                          LIKE   BSEG-PRZNR,
             PSEGMENT                       LIKE   BSEG-PSEGMENT,
             SAMNR                          LIKE   BSEG-SAMNR,
             SCTAX                          LIKE   BSEG-SCTAX,
             SEGMENT                        LIKE   BSEG-SEGMENT,
             SGTXT                          LIKE   BSEG-SGTXT,
             SRTYPE                         LIKE   BSEG-SRTYPE,
             UZAWE                          LIKE   BSEG-UZAWE,
             XREF1                          LIKE   BSEG-XREF1,
             XREF2                          LIKE   BSEG-XREF2,
             XREF3                          LIKE   BSEG-XREF3,
             ZUONR                          LIKE   BSEG-ZUONR,
             ZZBUSPARTN                     LIKE   BSEG-ZZBUSPARTN,
             ZZCHAN                         LIKE   BSEG-ZZCHAN,
             ZZLOB                          LIKE   BSEG-ZZLOB,
             ZZLOCA                         LIKE   BSEG-ZZLOCA,
             ZZPRODUCT                      LIKE   BSEG-ZZPRODUCT,
             ZZREGION                       LIKE   BSEG-ZZREGION,
             ZZSPREG                        LIKE   BSEG-ZZSPREG,
             ZZSTATE                        LIKE   BSEG-ZZSTATE,
             ZZUSERFLD1                     LIKE   BSEG-ZZUSERFLD1,
             ZZUSERFLD2                     LIKE   BSEG-ZZUSERFLD2,
             ZZUSERFLD3                     LIKE   BSEG-ZZUSERFLD3,
             END OF TEMP_STRUCT.
      IF IN_ORIG = BSEG .
        B_RESULT = B_FALSE.
        OUT_RESULT = IN_ORIG.
        EXIT.
      ENDIF.
      MOVE-CORRESPONDING BSEG TO TEMP_STRUCT.
      OUT_RESULT = IN_ORIG.
      MOVE-CORRESPONDING TEMP_STRUCT TO OUT_RESULT.
      IF IN_ORIG = OUT_RESULT .
        B_RESULT = B_FALSE.
      ELSE.
        B_RESULT = B_TRUE.
      ENDIF.
      BSEG = OUT_RESULT.
    ENDFORM.                               " EXP_TAB_009_BSEG
    I need the value of BSEG-HKONT should be passed to OUT_RESULT-HKONT.
    I am not able to find any userexit or BADI for this.
    Please guide me on this.
    Thanks,
    Chandravadan
    Edited by: Chandravadan Jaiswal on May 8, 2009 2:18 PM
    Edited by: Chandravadan Jaiswal on May 8, 2009 3:45 PM

    Hi
    I also need to change hkont while posting MIGO and MIRO transaction..
    Any suggestion for this?
    Here's my problem.. Substitution of account(HKONT) when posting in MIGO/MIRO

  • While user is posting the goods delivery. He was getting error "Field selec

    Hello
    SAP Experts
    i am getting an  error
    While user is posting the goods delivery. He was getting error "Field selection for movement type 981/account 1830200817(stock transfer account) differs for customer goods movement(015)" - Message no M7093.
    Thanks & Regards
    Narendra G

    Hi Narendra,
    Go to SE38 and run report RM07CUFA .This report gives you details as it compares FI and MM customizing ( mvmt type / acct G/L accnt no)
    Either you have to change the setting of the GL or the movement type..as per business requirement.
    This report will exactly give you which field has the conflict.
    Probable some field is required in FI and suppressed in MM or vice versa.. check it out.
    Regards,
    SAPFICO

  • Components were not consumed while posting the goods receipt through VL32N

    Hi Experts,
    We are into technical upgrade. We are upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 6.0. We are facing one issue. The issue is while posting the goods receipt for the subcontracting shceduling agreement through VL32N (Inbound Delivery) component materials were not consumed. While displaying the material document for the GR, could not find any compponent materials consumed with movement type 543, where as if I use the MIGO transaction code for the same inbound delivery, I could see the component materials were consumed with movement type 543.
    Could anybody tell us how to fix this issue if they come across.
    Appreciate your reply.
    Regards
    Bala

    Hi,
    Try checking below SAP notes
    Note 645119 - Problems with subcontracting using delivery
    338119 - Goods receipt in inbound delivery for SC order
    Hope this helps
    Reg
    Dheeraj

  • While doing the goods issue system is thruoghing an erro message no VL621

    hi ,
    actually while doing the goods issue we had put a validation if that filed(serial number) is not valid.like AVAILABLE then the system has through to an error message.but after that error message system is throughing an nother error.
    Risk of posting several mat.documents for one delivery->long text
        Message no. VL621
    Diagnosis
        Processing has been terminated because there is the risk that the system
        creates several material documents for this delivery.
    Procedure
        If this message occurs frequently, please note the exact situation and
        procedure as well as error messages and inform the system administrator.
    and we changed that error to warning also still we are getting that error message.
    how to stopthis error message.

    hi actually not for serial number check.
    there is a Z field in serial number master which is used for SIM number.
    that SIM number will be validated with available SIM number from another Z table.
    after this SIM error system is throughing this VL621 error after transaction terminated message.

  • HU error when Reversing the goods issue in STO process

    Hello Gurus,
    I will explain the whole process we follow for STO:
    1. Create sales order ->Based on PR in sales order schedule lines, PO will be created -> outbound delivery -> Pack in HU -> PGI -> based on output type Idoc will be triggered -> this outbound IDOC will create the Inbound IDOC and Inbound delivery -> Here HU will copied from Outbound delivery (Means both in inbound delivery and outbound delivery HU is same)-> then do the Good receipt in Inbound delivery.
    Now when user doing the goods receipt he is getting error MSSA-SATRA exceeded by 1PCE  The reason is someone deleted the item from the sales order.  Hence when user trying to post the GR it is checking for the open sales order item in MSSA table.  Since it has been deleted from the sales order he cant able post GR.
    Now user does not wants to receive this item, hence we wants to reverse the process.
    So we followed the below process:
    1. Unassigned the HU in Inbound delivery and then deleted the Inbound delivery.
    2. Then used VL09 transaction to reverse the goods issue.  But system giving error saying that HU is already assigned to object.
    I cant able to reverse the Goods issue since the HU is same in Inbound delivery and outbound delivery.
    Kindly suggest the reversal process for the above case.  Many thanks for your help in advance.
    Awating for your valuable replies.
    Br,

    Insted of deleting the handling units you should have un assign the handling units from inbound delivery.You have deleted the handling units and the same handling units will not be available in outbound delivery Pack icon.
    Do one thing are you able to enter line item in sales order ?.If yes then create inbound delivery manually and create new handling units for the qty and do GR.
    Currently where is the stock is it transit ?.If yes then above option may work.
    If nothing is possible only an option to write a SAP oss note they will correct your outbound delivery and inbound delivery.

  • Packaging material is not appearing in the Goods receipt of STPO

    Dear All,
    We are currently dealing one Roll-Out project for one multinational company. In that from sales side, one of the main processes defined is u201CStock Transport Purchase Order processu201D. As a regular process, outbound delivery document also created with ref to STPO.
    As per the client requirement the u201CPackaging materialu201D needs to be added as additional line item in the delivery to calculate the packaging cost. This packaging material is a "Stockable and Valuated" material. So while performing the PGI the stock will get reduced from SD side.
    The problem is, using this same STPO delivery document the Goods receipt is planned to do in the another side of company code. while doing the Goods receipt system is displaying only the "Finished Product" only. The packaging material is not displaying while doing the goods receipt in the another company code.
    due to this we are not able to complete our test cycle.
    so we need the expert opinion to solve this issue.
    if the packaging material is added as additional line item while doing Goods receipt then, the problem is solved.
    Kindly suggest us...
    Regards,
    MANI
    frWe have customized that also and now u201CPackaging materialu201D is adding as a new line item in the delivery document as a non valuated material.
    But the issue is, the Billing type u201CZICu201D is not getting determined while creation of billing if u201CPackaging materialu201D is added as a new line item. If u201CPackaging materialu201D is not added as a line item then, billing type is getting determined automatically without any issue.
    We have checked in LIKP table, its containing the billing type as u201CZICu2019. But if packaging material is added then, the billing type determination is not happening.
    We are assuming that some customizing needs to be done from MM/SD point of view. I am seeking the experts help regarding this issue to solve the problem.
    Regards,
    MANI

    Dear Friends,
              Thanks for the Feedback.
    Even though it is a associated company, in one company code the packaging material stock was reduced and packed for the STPO shipment.
    After receiving the consignment, in the receiving company code they will perform the goods receipt with ref to "Outbound Delivery" document.
    Since in the outbound delivery document "Packaging material" also available. So as a business strategy we are expecting the same "packaging material" also should available for goods receipt.
    I hope i have explained with max of my knowledge to clear your doubt.

  • What is the  FM/BAPI  to get the Goods Receipt  Based on the Purchase Order

    Hi ,
    I want FM/BPI  to get the Goods Receipt  Based on the Purchase Order in MM.
    Thnx in advance

    Hi
    BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Setting the Goods Receipt indicator in SRM

    Hi,
    I have been assigned to clear the goods receipt indicator for certain vendors during the purchase order creation process. I modified the BADI BBP_B46B_PO_OUTBOUND to clear the gr_indicator and it does that. On R/3 EKPO-WEPOS(gr_indicator)  is clear. The problem is When I display the purchase order in SRM by clicking Header Data\Follow on Documents\ the Confirm Performance of Service Goods Receipt
    checkbox is still populated. I have been told that is because there is a SRM table where that gr_indicator is located but we can not determine which tables. I wanted to trace the transaction bbp_pd but we can not trace in our QA environment.
    Does anyone know the SRM table that contains the Goods Receipts indicator?

    Hi,
    For quicked Replies..........Post to the dedicated SRM Forums
    Forum->SAP Solutions->SRM - General
    Forum->SAP Solutions->SRM - Shopping Cart & Catalog
    Forum->SAP Solutions->SRM - Workflow & User/Vendor/Org. Management

  • CVD and ADC accounts are not getting credited during the Goods Receipt of Imports PO (India)

    Hello team,
    We are receiving the goods against with the Imports PO. Before the GR, we have paid the Customs duties to the Indian government. And, in the Invoice of Customs (MIRO), the CVD and ADC G/L Accounts got debited with the respective Accrual Accounts which are maintained in the Pricing of Imports at the CVD and ADC conditions. But, as per the standard procedure, during the GR, the same gets credited. But, it's not happening.
    Can anybody suggest what is the bug here that we need to correct?
    Thanks in advance for your response.
    Regards,
    Satya

    Have you used subtransaction type IP in MIGO.
    Refer below notes.
    929681
    - Subtransaction type not picked up for ADC in MIGO C&P EI
    910681
    - Legal changes on Additional Duty of Custom
    and
    964190
    - ADC on domestic purchase of imported goods
    Regards
    Binoy

Maybe you are looking for